基于产权叠加效应视角的农户林业生产投入

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240486

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 厘清集体林地确权对农户林业生产投入的作用机制，为深化集体林权制度改革提供理论依据。方法: 基于产权安全性假说区分集体林权制度改革前既有林地和改革后新增林地的确权激励差异，充分考虑集体林权制度改革嵌入的社会经济环境变化，利用9省（区）18县（市）3 158个样本农户2003—2021年非平衡面板数据和固定效应模型，估计集体林地确权对农户林业生产投入的影响，并开展动态影响和异质性分析。结果: 1）集体林地确权激励农户增加林业生产投入，产权叠加的正向效应主要体现在增加林业投资；2）农户对既有林地的生产投入存在“阿森费尔特沉降”，林业资本投入规避产权风险的意识强于劳动力投入；3）集体林地确权对农户林业生产投入的影响存在显著的区域和林地规模异质性。结论: 林地产权长期稳定能够有效激励农户增加林业生产投入，需继续强化集体林地确权登记和补漏纠错，因地制宜地实施集体林地承包权延包工作，促进高水平保护和高质量发展的进一步协调，通过机制和模式创新推动集体林适度规模经营。

关键词: 集体林权制度改革, 林业生产投入, 产权叠加效应

Abstract:

Objective: To clarify the mechanism of the new round of confirming collective forestland property rights on farmers’ forestry production input, and to provide theoretical basis for deepening the reform of collective forestland tenure. Method: On the basis of a unbalanced panel data of 3 158 sample farmers from 18 counties (cities) in 9 provinces (autonomous regions) from 2003 to 2021 and fixed effects models, by identifying the difference of incentive between the existing forestland before the new round of collective forestland tenure reform and the newly acquired forestland after the new round of collective forestland tenure reform and fully considering the social and economic environment changes around the collective forestland tenure reform, the impact of confirming collective forestland property rights on farmers’ forestry production input was estimated, and dynamic impact analysis and heterogeneity analysis were carried out. Result: 1) Confirming collective forestland property rights has a positive incentive effect on farmers’ forestry production input, and the positive cumulative effect of property rights is mainly reflected in forestry investment. 2) Farmers’ forestry production input on existing forestland has an obvious “Ashenfelter’s dip”, and awareness of avoiding property rights risks in capital input is stronger than in labor input. 3) The impact of the confirming collective forestland property rights on farmers’ forestry production input has significant regional and scale heterogeneity. Conclusion: Long-term stable property rights of forestland can effectively motivate farmers to increase forestry production input. It is necessary to continue to strengthen the property rights registration of collective forestland and make up for omissions and correct errors, implement the renewal of forestland contract rights according to local conditions, promote coordinate of high-level protection and high-quality development, and promote the appropriate scale management of collective forestland through mechanism and model innovation.

Key words: the reform of collective forestland tenure, forestry production input, property rights cumulative effect

中图分类号:

S7-9
F307.2

刘浩,张连刚,刘璨. 基于产权叠加效应视角的农户林业生产投入[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(10): 211-220.

Hao Liu,Liangang Zhang,Can Liu. Farmers’ Forestry Production Input from Perspective of the Property Rights Cumulative Effect[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(10): 211-220.

图/表 5

表1

主要变量定义及描述性统计①"

变量 Variable	代码 Code	2003	2011	2021
林地面积Forestland area/hm²	$ {\mathrm{fa}} $	1.88 (4.05)	2.66 (4.75)	2.61 (6.27)
已发证的林地面积Forestland area (tenure certified)/hm²	$ {\mathrm{fz}} $	0.04 (0.43)	2.19 (4.47)	2.17 (5.88)
既有林地面积Existing forestland area/hm²	$ {\mathrm{fo}} $	1.75 (4.00)	1.74 (3.71)	1.70 (3.87)
已发证的既有林地面积Existing forestland area (tenure certified)/hm²	$ {\mathrm{foz}} $	0.02 (0.22)	1.54 (3.62)	1.52 (3.81)
新增林地面积Newly acquired forestland area/hm²	$ {\mathrm{fn}} $	0.13 (0.74)	0.92 (3.31)	0.91 (5.10)
已发证的新增林地面积 Newly acquired forestland area (tenure certified)/hm²	$ {\mathrm{fnz}} $	0.02 (0.33)	0.65 (2.89)	0.65 (4.59)
林业劳动力投入Forestry labor input/(person·day)	$ {\mathrm{fl}} $	34.08 (973.98)	35.56 (76.01)	17.05 (70.27)
林业资本投入Forestry capital/yuan	$ {\mathrm{fk}} $	782.67 (4 568.31)	863.54 (3 697.36)	1 276.33 (14 905.27)
公益林面积比例The ratio of public welfare forest area	$ {\mathrm{pfr}} $	0.03 (0.16)	0.16 (0.28)	0.34 (0.43)
森林保险投保（是=1；否=0） Household has forest insurance (Yes=1; No=0)	$ {\mathrm{r}}{{\mathrm{p}}_1} $	0.00 (0.00)	0.21 (0.40)	0.48 (0.50)
容易获得林木采伐指标（是=1；否=0） Easiness to obtain allowable annual cut (Yes=1; No=0)	$ {\mathrm{r}}{{\mathrm{p}}_2} $	0.00 (0.00)	0.32 (0.47)	0.41 (0.38)
曾获得林权贷款（是=1；否=0） Obtained forestland tenure mortgage loan (Yes=1; No=0)	$ {\mathrm{r}}{{\mathrm{p}}_3} $	0.00 (0.00)	0.01 (0.12)	0.02 (0.13)
劳动力价格指数（2003年=1）Off-farm wage index (2003 = 1)	$ {\mathrm{m}}{{\mathrm{h}}_1} $	1.00 (0.00)	1.31 (0.28)	3.22 (0.79)
央行1年期存款基准利率Annual interest rate (%)	$ {\mathrm{m}}{{\mathrm{h}}_2} $	1.98 (0.00)	3.25 (0.00)	1.50 (0.00)
木材价格指数（2003年=1）Timber price index (2003 = 1)	$ {\mathrm{m}}{{\mathrm{h}}_3} $	1.00 (0.00)	1.59 (0.34)	2.13 (0.51)
户主年龄Age of head of household/a	$ {\mathrm{h}}{{\mathrm{i}}_1} $	44.55 (10.46)	52.69 (10.50)	60.21 (10.10)
户主受教育年限Years of education of head of household/a	$ {\mathrm{h}}{{\mathrm{i}}_2} $	7.18 (2.67)	7.41 (2.74)	7.45 (3.33)
家庭劳动力数量Labor size of household/person	$ {\mathrm{h}}{{\mathrm{i}}_3} $	2.85 (1.23)	2.84 (1.20)	1.84 (1.28)
家庭总收入Total revenue/yuan	$ {\mathrm{h}}{{\mathrm{i}}_4} $	14 969.75 (23 471.60)	26 809.60 (33 681.72)	39 013.31 (82 266.85)
村庄地处山区（是=1；否=0） Village located in the mountainous area (Yes=1; No=0)	$ {\mathrm{h}}{{\mathrm{v}}_1} $	0.57 (0.50)	0.56 (0.50)	0.48 (0.50)
村庄道路已硬化（是=1；否=0） The village roads have been hardened (Yes=1; No=0)	${\mathrm{ h}}{{\mathrm{v}}_2} $	0.62 (0.48)	0.73 (0.44)	1.00 (0.00)
村庄到县城的距离The distance from the village to county town/km	$ \mathrm{hv_3} $	34.90 (30.47)	35.27 (30.87)	29.76 (26.19)

表1

表2

新一轮集体林地确权对样本农户林业生产要素投入的影响①"

变量 Variable	ln_林业劳动力投入 ln_Forestry labor input/(person·day)			ln_林业资本投入 ln_Forestry capital/yuan
变量 Variable	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅴ	Ⅵ
林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of forestland	0.302^*** (0.082)	0.383^*** (0.096)		0.220^** (0.101)	0.218^** (0.120)
既有林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of existing forestland			0.368^*** (0.096)			0.305^*** (0.122)
新增林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of newly acquired forestland			0.119^*** (0.024)			0.063 (0.050)
森林保险投保 Household has forest insurance		0.424^*** (0.065)	0.422^*** (0.065)		0.374^*** (0.082)	0.367^*** (0.082)
容易获得林木采伐指标 Easiness to obtain allowable annual cut		0.507^*** (0.076)	0.533^*** (0.076)		0.370^*** (0.095)	0.400^*** (0.095)
曾获得林权贷款 Obtained forestland tenure mortgage loan		0.436 (0.276)	0.447 (0.276)		0.385^*** (0.047)	0.391^*** (0.047)
ln_林业资本投入 ln_Forestry capital	?0.312^*** (0.005)	?0.313^*** (0.005)	?0.341^*** (0.004)
ln_林业劳动力投入 ln_Forestry labor input				?0.493^*** (0.008)	?0.493^*** (0.008)	?0.524^*** (0.007)
ln_林地面积 ln_Forestland area	0.118^*** (0.014)	0.164^*** (0.035)		0.071^** (0.037)	0.071^* (0.040)
ln_既有林地面积 ln_Existing area of forestland			0.134^** (0.063)			0.095^* (0.052)
ln_新增林地面积 ln_Newly acquired area of forestland			0.115^*** (0.019)			0.036^* (0.020)
生态公益林比例 The ratio of public welfare forest area		?0.218^** (0.092)	?0.219^** (0.092)		?0.324^*** (0.126)	?0.321^** (0.126)
ln_户主年龄 ln_Age of head of household		7.443^** (3.689)	7.303^** (3.696)		10.121^** (4.494)	9.593^** (4.500)
ln_户主年龄的平方 Square of ln_Age of head of household		?1.016^** (0.477)	?0.999^** (0.477)		?1.226^** (0.580)	?1.159^** (0.581)
ln_户主受教育年限 ln_Years of education of head of household		0.035 (0.026)	0.036 (0.026)		0.066^** (0.032)	0.067^** (0.032)
ln_家庭劳动力数 ln_Labor size of household		0.010 (0.019)	0.009 (0.019)
ln_总收入 ln_Total revenue					0.253^*** (0.022)	0.253^*** (0.022)
村庄地处山区 Village located in the mountainous area		?0.389^** (0.158)	?0.343^** (0.159)		?0.786^*** (0.200)	?0.724^*** (0.200)
村庄道路已硬化 The village roads have been hardened		0.416^*** (0.093)	0.410^*** (0.093)		0.078 (0.117)	0.053 (0.117)
ln_所在村到县城的距离 ln_The distance from the village to county town		?0.156 (0.135)	?0.165 (0.135)		?0.251 (0.169)	?0.264 (0.169)
劳动力价格指数 Off-farm wage index		?0.909^*** (0.058)	?0.916^*** (0.058)		?0.264^*** (0.072)	?0.268^*** (0.072)
央行1年期存款基准利率 Annual interest rate		0.055 (0.038)	0.053 (0.038)		?0.163^*** (0.040)	?0.172^*** (0.043)
木材价格指数 Timber price index		0.108 (0.109)	0.093 (0.109)		0.308^*** (0.086)	0.314^*** (0.087)
时期Period (t)	?0.107^*** (0.004)	?0.010 (0.013)	?0.004 (0.013)	?0.140^*** (0.005)	?0.124^*** (0.017)	?0.119^*** (0.017)
截距Intercept	0.270 (0.247)	?13.704^** (6.910)	?11.548^* (6.685)	?0.460^*** (0.061)	?24.334^*** (8.819)	?21.320^** (8.972)
样本数 Observation	32 600	32 600	32 600	32 600	32 600	32 600
R²	0.320	0.283	0.283	0.284	0.259	0.201

表2

表3

既有林地确权发证对样本农户林业劳动力和资本投入的动态影响"

变量 Variable	ln_林业劳动力投入 ln_Forestry labor input/(person·day)	ln_林业资本投入 ln_Forestry capital/yuan
既有林地面积×发证前第7年 Existing forestland area × 7th year before the tenure certified	0.141^*** (0.015)	0.110^** (0.040)
既有林地面积×发证前第6年 Existing forestland area × 6th year before the tenure certified	0.142^*** (0.016)	0.083^* (0.050)
既有林地面积×发证前第5年 Existing forestland area × 5th year before the tenure certified	0.136^*** (0.031)	0.098^** (0.046)
既有林地面积×发证前第4年 Existing forestland area × 4th year before the tenure certified	0.114^** (0.052)	0.084^* (0.048)
既有林地面积×发证前第3年 Existing forestland area × 3rd year before the tenure certified	0.128^*** (0.029)	0.061 (0.052)
既有林地面积×发证前第2年 Existing forestland area × 2nd year before the tenure certified	0.096 (0.071)	0.103 (0.077)
既有林地面积×发证前第1年 Existing forestland area × 1st year before the tenure certified	0.116^* (0.069)	0.045 (0.039)
既有林地面积×发证当年 Existing forestland area × year of the tenure certified	0.111 (0.073)	0.046 (0.037)
既有林地面积×发证后第1年 Existing forestland area × 1st year after the tenure certified	0.133^*** (0.013)	0.084^** (0.041)
既有林地面积×发证后第2年 Existing forestland area × 2nd year after the tenure certified	0.233^*** (0.047)	0.127^* (0.071)
既有林地面积×发证后第3年 Existing forestland area × 3rd year after the tenure certified	0.343^*** (0.121)	0.151^*** (0.017)
既有林地面积×发证后第4年 Existing forestland area × 4th year after the tenure certified	0.149^*** (0.055)	0.202^** (0.082)
既有林地面积×发证后第5年 Existing forestland area × 5th year after the tenure certified	0.163^*** (0.048)	0.097^** (0.044)
既有林地面积×发证后第6年 Existing forestland area × 6th year after the tenure certified	0.135^* (0.069)	0.124^** (0.049)
既有林地面积×发证后第7年 Existing forestland area × 7th year after the tenure certified	0.148^** (0.068)	0.087^* (0.045)
既有林地面积×发证后第8年 Existing forestland area × 8th year after the tenure certified	0.154^** (0.070)	0.121^** (0.056)
既有林地面积×发证后第9年 Existing forestland area × 9th year after the tenure certified	0.216^*** (0.009)	0.241^*** (0.023)
既有林地面积×发证后第10年 Existing forestland area × 10th year after the tenure certified	0.172^*** (0.019)	0.161^*** (0.009)
既有林地面积×发证后第11年 Existing forestland area × 11th year after the tenure certified	0.248^*** (0.077)	0.130^** (0.066)
既有林地面积×发证后第12年 Existing forestland area × 12th year after the tenure certified	0.132^* (0.073)	0.079 (0.057)
既有林地面积×发证后第13年 Existing forestland area × 13th year after the tenure certified	0.132^** (0.060)	0.099 (0.067)
既有林地面积×发证后第14年 Existing forestland area × 14th year after the tenure certified	0.122^** (0.062)	0.210^** (0.104)
既有林地面积×发证后第15年 Existing forestland area × 15th year after the tenure certified	0.102 (0.083)	0.174^* (0.101)
既有林地面积×发证后第16年 Existing forestland area × 16th year after the tenure certified	0.145^* (0.083)	0.101 (0.074)
既有林地面积×发证后第17年 Existing forestland area × 17th year after the tenure certified	0.119^* (0.070)	0.111^* (0.065)

表3

表4

表5

参考文献 0

	程军国, 刘　璨, 刘　浩, 等. 担保品竞争: 缓解林权抵押约束对农户信贷的影响. 中国农村经济, 2023, (1): 140- 159.
	Cheng J G, Liu C, Liu H, et al. Collateral competition: the effect of forest rights collateral on rural households’ credit. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023, (1): 140- 159.
	林文声, 王志刚, 王美阳. 农地确权、要素配置与农业生产效率: 基于中国劳动力动态调查的实证分析. 中国农村经济, 2018, (8): 64- 82.
	Lin W S, Wang Z G, Wang M Y. Land registration and certification, production factor allocation and agricultural production efficiency: an analysis based on China labor-force dynamics survey. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, (8): 64- 82.
	刘　璨, 康子昊, 朱文清, 等. 中国集体林权制度改革: 2012年以来的新进展与40余年的典型事实分析. 林业经济, 2024, 46 (5): 5- 23.
	Liu C, Kang Z H, Zhu W Q, et al. China’s reform of collective forestland tenure: new progresses since 2012 and stylized facts over the past 40 years. Forestry Economics, 2024, 46 (5): 5- 23.
	刘　璨, 张　寒. 集体林权制度改革进程、效应与演化: 2002—2022年. 改革, 2023, (8): 140- 155.
	Liu C, Zhang H. The course, effects, and evolution of the reform of collective forest rights system: 2002—2022. Reform, 2023, (8): 140- 155.
	刘　浩, 王雁斌, 刘　璨. 林地细碎化、产权激励对林业生产要素配置的影响. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38 (7): 1771- 1783. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230709
	Liu H, Wang Y B, Liu C. The effect of forestland fragmentation and tenure incentive on the allocation of forest production input. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38 (7): 1771- 1783. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230709
	罗必良, 洪炜杰. 农地确权与农户要素配置的逻辑. 农村经济, 2020, (1): 1- 7.
	Luo B L, Hong W J. Logic of confirming farmland rights and allocation of farmers' elements. Rural Economy, 2020, (1): 1- 7.
	西格蒙德·弗洛伊德. 1986. 论创造力与无意识. 孙恺祥, 译. 北京: 中国展望出版社.
	Sigmund Freud. 1986. On creativity and the unconscious. Sun K X, Trans. Beijing: China Prospect Press. ［in Chinese］
	王恩慧, 石道金, 王晓丽, 等. 公益林补偿政策、非农就业与农户增收. 林业经济, 2022, 44 (7): 5- 21.
	Wang E H, Shi D J, Wang X L, et al. Public welfare forest compensation policy, non-agricultural employment and farmers’ income increase. Forestry Economics, 2022, 44 (7): 5- 21.
	魏　建, 尹少华, 刘　璨. 新一轮集体林改对不同类型农户林业生产投入的影响研究. 林业经济问题, 2019, 39 (5): 465- 473.
	Wei J, Yin S H, Liu C. Research on the impacts of the new round of collective forest tenure reform on different types of rural households’ forest production input. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2019, 39 (5): 465- 473.
	张　寒, 刘　璨, 刘　浩. 林地调整对农户营林积极性的因果效应分析: 基于异质性视角的倾向值匹配估计. 农业技术经济, 2017, (1): 37- 51.
	Zhang H, Liu C, Liu H. Analysis on the cause-effect effect of forest land adjustment on farmer’s forest-planting enthusiasm: based on the heterogeneity perspective propensity and value matching estimation. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017, (1): 37- 51.
	张　寒, 赵赛菲, 赵　青. 劳动力成本上升与农户营林投入结构调整: 基于林种视角的分析. 林业经济, 2023, 45 (2): 5- 19.
	Zhang H, Zhao S F, Zhao Q. Rising labor costs and farmers’ input structure adjustment in forest culture and management: analysis based on the perspective of forest category. Forestry Economics, 2023, 45 (2): 5- 19.
	朱文清, 张莉琴. 集体林地确权到户对林地流转的政策效果分析. 资源科学, 2018, 40 (7): 1407- 1417.
	Zhu W Q, Zhang L Q. The impact of confirming collective forest land property rights to households on the forest land circulation behavior of farmers. Resources Science, 2018, 40 (7): 1407- 1417.
	朱文清, 张莉琴. 集体林地确权对农户林地管护投入的影响. 改革, 2022, (3): 131- 145.
	Zhu W Q, Zhang L Q. The impact of collective woodland ownership confirmation on farmers' investment in woodland management and protection. Reform, 2022, (3): 131- 145.
	Arnot C D, Luckert M K, Boxall P C. What is tenure security? Conceptual implications for empirical analysis. Land Economics, 2011, 87 (2): 297- 311. doi: 10.3368/le.87.2.297
	Becker G S. Nobel lecture: the economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101 (3): 385- 409. doi: 10.1086/261880
	Besley T. Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103 (5): 903- 937. doi: 10.1086/262008
	Brasselle A S, Gaspart F, Platteau J P. Land tenure security and investment incentives: puzzling evidence from Burkina Faso. Journal of Development Economics, 2002, 67 (2): 373- 418. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00190-0
	Chatterjee S, Hadi A S. 2012. Regression analysis by example. 5th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
	Deacon R T. Deforestation and the rule of law in a cross-section of countries. Land Economics, 1994, 70 (4): 414- 430. doi: 10.2307/3146638
	Devereux S, Hoddinott J. Fieldwork in developing countries. The Journal of Asian Studies, 1996, 52, 419- 420.
	Hakim C. 2000. Research design: successful designs for social economics research. New York: Routledge.
	Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 1968, 162 (3859): 1243- 1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
	Liu C, Liu H, Wang S. 2017. Has China’s new round of collective forest reforms caused an increase in the use of productive forest inputs? Land Use Policy, 64: 492−510.
	Melesse M B, Bulte E. Does land registration and certification boost farm productivity? Evidence from Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 2015, 46 (6): 757- 768. doi: 10.1111/agec.12191
	Schultz T W. The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature, 1975, 13 (3): 827- 846.
	Wooldridge J M. 1999. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Chula Vista: South-Western College Publishing.
	Yin R S, Liu H, Liu C, et al. 2018. Households’ decisions to participate in China’s sloping land conversion program and reallocate their labour times: is there endogeneity bias? Ecological Economics, 145: 380−390.

变量 Variable	山东 Shandong	辽宁 Liaoning	河南 Henan	四川 Sichuan	浙江 Zhejiang	福建 Fujian	湖南 Hunan	江西 Jiangxi	广西 Guangxi
变量 Variable	ln_林业劳动力投入ln_Forestry labor input/(person·day)
既有林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of existing forestland	0.149^** (0.063)	0.381^*** (0.107)	0.230^** (0.111)	0.107^* (0.062)	0.094^* (0.055)	0.116 (0.083)	0.168^** (0.081)	0.421^*** (0.089)	0.532^*** (0.162)
新增林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of newly acquired forestland	0.058 (0.041)	0.090 (0.669)	0.131^** (0.061)	0.253^* (0.139)	0.062 (0.043)	0.442^*** (0.107)	0.144^** (0.072)	0.108^* (0.056)	0.275^*** (0.100)
	ln_林业资本投入ln_Forestry capital input/yuan
既有林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of existing forestland	0.104^** (0.045)	0.316^*** (0.066)	0.138^* (0.079)	0.201^* (0.120)	0.172 (0.141)	0.217 (0.167)	0.172^* (0.097)	0.369^** (0.180)	0.447^*** (0.153)
新增林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of newly acquired forestland	0.042 (0.031)	0.740 (0.052)	0.028 (0.020)	0.130^* (0.074)	0.178^* (0.107)	0.260^*** (0.021)	0.037 (0.029)	0.121 (0.089)	0.156^** (0.063)

变量 Variable	小规模（林地面积≤0.33 hm²） Smallest scale （forestland area ≤ 0.33 hm²）	较小规模（0.33 hm² < 林地面积≤1.67 hm²） Smaller scale （0.33 hm² <forestland area ≤1.67 hm²）	中等规模（1.67 hm²<林地面积≤3.33 hm²） Medium scale （1.67 hm²<forestland area ≤3.33 hm²）	较大规模（3.33 hm²< 林地面积≤6.67 hm²） Larger scale （3.33 hm²<forestland area ≤6.67 hm²）	大规模（6.67 hm²< 林地面积） Largest scale （6.67 hm²< forestland area）
变量 Variable	ln_林业劳动力投入ln_Forestry labor input/(person·day)
既有林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of existing forestland	0.192 (0.153)	0.417^*** (0.086)	0.288^** (0.129)	0.261 (0.190)	0.433 (0.330)
新增林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of newly acquired forestland	0.285 (0.202)	0.350^** (0.121)	0.432^** (0.209)	0.055 (0.042)	0.017 (0.011)
	ln_林业资本投入 ln_Forestry capital/yuan
既有林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of existing forestland	0.214 (0.147)	0.179 (0.128)	0.233^* (0.139)	0.642^*** (0.098)	0.406^* (0.221)
新增林地发证比例 Tenure certified ratio of newly acquired forestland	0.038 (0.027)	0.201 (0.165)	0.334 (0.207)	0.287^* (0.159)	0.062 (0.055)

[1]	魏建,戴永务,刘璨. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对农户经济福利的作用机制与影响测度[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 195-210.
[2]	施正煌,侯方淼,张浩昆,黄国星. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对中国木质林产品出口边际增长的影响分析[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 211-222.
[3]	谢芳婷,施建玲,朱臻,沈月琴. 林地产权安全对林农非木质林产品经营投入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 204-218.
[4]	陈幸良,窦亚权. 林下经济高质量发展：战略要义、技术突破与关键举措[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(7): 59-71.
[5]	程钰,刘璨,杨红强,张寒. 商品林种植结构的“趋经济林化”——基于劳动力成本效应及相对收益效应的成因分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 184-193.
[6]	赵晓迪, 李凌超, 杨文涛, 程宝栋, 刘金龙. 福建省县域森林转型社会经济影响因素分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 147-156.
[7]	赵静, 李婷婷, 申津羽, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革绩效评价及其对林农森林经营意愿影响分析——基于福建省永安市的农户调查数据[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 138-146.
[8]	王小军, 谢屹, 王立群, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革中的农户森林经营行为与影响因素——以福建省邵武市和尤溪县为例[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 135-142.
[9]	苏时鹏;马梅芸;林群. 集体林权制度改革后农户林业全要素生产率的变动——基于福建农户的跟踪调查[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(6): 127-135.
[10]	孔凡斌;廖文梅. 集体林分权条件下的林地细碎化程度及与农户林地投入产出的关系——基于江西省8县602户农户调查数据的分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(4): 119-126.
[11]	孔凡斌;. 集体林权制度改革对林区县乡财政性收入影响评价——基于江西省赣州市的调查[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(9): 120-129.
[12]	王文烂. 集体林权制度改革对农民林业收入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(8): 141-146.
[13]	谢屹;温亚利;公培臣. 集体林权制度改革中农户流转收益合理性分析*——以江西省遂川县为例[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(10): 134-140.
[14]	吕杰黄利. 辽宁省集体林权制度改革与林业产业发展的现状[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(8): 112-117.
[15]	张敏新肖平张红霄. “均山”：集体林权制度改革的现实选择[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(8): 131-136.