林业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 32-42.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220104
祁琳,郭龙梅,刘尤德,曹帮华*,毛培利,李泽秀
收稿日期:
2020-12-14
出版日期:
2022-01-25
发布日期:
2022-03-08
通讯作者:
曹帮华
基金资助:
Lin Qi,Longmei Guo,Youde Liu,Banghua Cao*,Peili Mao,Zexiu Li
Received:
2020-12-14
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-03-08
Contact:
Banghua Cao
摘要:
目的: 研究NaCl胁迫下的刺槐非结构性碳水化合物(NSC)动态变化,揭示其对NaCl胁迫的适应机制,为刺槐林经营管理提供依据。方法: 以1年生刺槐苗为研究对象,通过盆栽试验,研究不同NaCl浓度(0、1.5‰、3‰、4.5‰)下苗木的相对生长速率、生物量分配和NSC含量的变化规律。结果: 1) 随着土壤NaCl浓度增加,刺槐苗木的地径和苗高相对生长速率显著降低; 随着NaCl胁迫持续时间增加,叶生物量的增速逐渐降低,而根生物量增速变化不显著,导致叶生物量比显著降低,根生物量比和根冠比显著增加。2) 随着土壤NaCl浓度的增加,粗根、细根、茎和叶中的NSC(可溶性糖、淀粉)含量在土壤NaCl浓度3‰以下梯度间差异不显著,但达到4.5‰各个器官中的NSC含量均显著下降,粗根的淀粉含量显著高于细根、茎和叶。3) 相关分析表明,地径和苗高相对生长速率与叶生物量比、粗根可溶性糖呈显著正相关(P < 0.05),与根生物量比和根冠比呈极显著负相关(P < 0.01); 粗根淀粉与细根可溶性糖和茎可溶性糖、茎淀粉与茎可溶性糖有着显著正相关(P < 0.05),说明NSC动态变化影响生物量分配进而影响器官的协调生长,是刺槐适应盐碱能力的重要体现。4) 主成分分析表明,NaCl胁迫下评价刺槐适应能力可以简化为生长指标、粗根NSC指标和茎NSC指标3个主成分,贡献率分别为43.05%、15.99%、14.65%,累计贡献率为73.69%。结论: NaCl胁迫显著抑制了刺槐幼苗的生长。NSC对叶片投入的降低和根系投入的增加,是导致刺槐苗木生长缓慢的重要原因。粗根是淀粉最重要的贮藏器官,淀粉不直接参与生长过程,但却是可溶性糖的重要来源,而可溶性糖是影响NaCl胁迫下刺槐苗木生长的主要物质。刺槐苗木根系生物量的分配和非结构性碳水化合物的调节是刺槐适应NaCl胁迫的重要方式。
中图分类号:
祁琳,郭龙梅,刘尤德,曹帮华,毛培利,李泽秀. 刺槐幼苗非结构性碳水化合物对NaCl胁迫的动态响应[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 32-42.
Lin Qi,Longmei Guo,Youde Liu,Banghua Cao,Peili Mao,Zexiu Li. Dynamic Responses of Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Robinia pseudoacacia Seedlings to NaCl Stress[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 32-42.
表1
NaCl胁迫对刺槐苗木生长、生物量分配和NSC的相关性分析①"
指标 Index | 相对地径 生长速率 RGRD | 相对高生 长速率 RGRH | 根生物量 Root biomass | 茎生物量 Stem biomass | 叶生物量 Leaf biomass | 总生物量 Total biomass | 根生物 量比 RMR | 茎生物 量比 SMR | 叶生物 量比 LMR | 根冠比 R/S | 粗根可溶 性糖 Coarse root soluble sugar | 细根可 溶性糖 Fine root soluble sugar | 茎可溶 性糖 Stem soluble sugar | 叶可溶 性糖 Leaf soluble sugar | 粗根淀粉 Coarse root starch | 细根淀粉 Fine root starch | 茎淀粉 Stem starch | 叶淀粉 Leaf starch | 粗根非 结构性 碳水化 合物 Coarse root NSC | 细根非 结构性 碳水化 合物 Fine root NSC | 茎非 结构性 碳水化 合物 Stem NSC |
相对高生长速率RGRH | 0.868** | ||||||||||||||||||||
根生物量Root biomass | 0.171 | 0.386 | |||||||||||||||||||
茎生物量Stem biomass | 0.874** | 0.927** | 0.548 | ||||||||||||||||||
叶生物量Leaf biomass | 0.849** | 0.869** | 0.450 | 0.966** | |||||||||||||||||
总生物量Total biomass | 0.788** | 0.869** | 0.664* | 0.982** | 0.962** | ||||||||||||||||
根生物量比RMR | -0.866** | -0.771** | -0.139 | -0.826** | -0.901** | -0.787** | |||||||||||||||
茎生物量比SMR | 0.543 | 0.414 | -0.250 | 0.303 | 0.165 | 0.139 | -0.238 | ||||||||||||||
叶生物量比LMR | 0.664* | 0.620* | 0.241 | 0.719* | 0.851** | 0.745** | -0.922** | -0.156 | |||||||||||||
根冠比R/S | -0.832** | -0.743** | -0.178 | -0.801** | -0.877** | -0.775** | 0.992** | -0.176 | -0.939** | ||||||||||||
粗根可溶性糖Coarse root soluble sugar | 0.604* | 0.637* | 0.418 | 0.762** | 0.794** | 0.776** | -0.756** | 0.138 | 0.713* | -0.747** | |||||||||||
细根可溶性糖Fine root soluble sugar | 0.137 | -0.010 | 0.590 | 0.339 | 0.380 | 0.453 | -0.245 | -0.284 | 0.362 | -0.274 | 0.444 | ||||||||||
茎可溶性糖 Stem soluble sugar | -0.168 | -0.123 | 0.470 | 0.084 | 0.100 | 0.191 | -0.055 | -0.361 | 0.200 | -0.101 | 0.558 | 0.535 | |||||||||
叶可溶性糖 Leaf soluble sugar | 0.677* | 0.526 | 0.282 | 0.636* | 0.735** | 0.667* | -0.806** | -0.109 | 0.863** | -0.833 | 0.514 | 0.393 | 0.035 | ||||||||
粗根淀粉 Coarse root starch | -0.136 | -0.136 | 0.497 | 0.035 | -0.025 | 0.118 | 0.161 | -0.159 | -0.100 | 0.121 | 0.326 | 0.655* | 0.634* | -0.136 | |||||||
细根淀粉 Fine root starch | -0.083 | 0.055 | 0.310 | 0.079 | 0.029 | 0.117 | -0.076 | -0.129 | 0.128 | -0.151 | -0.021 | 0.188 | 0.001 | 0.097 | 0.091 | ||||||
茎淀粉 Stem starch | -0.179 | -0.198 | 0.143 | -0.090 | -0.057 | -0.029 | -0.142 | -0.192 | 0.220 | -0.225 | 0.391 | 0.336 | 0.742** | 0.091 | 0.435 | 0.371 | |||||
叶淀粉 Leaf starch | 0.560 | 0.541 | 0.551 | 0.743** | 0.753** | 0.780** | -0.646* | 0.107 | 0.615* | -0.638* | 0.612* | 0.500 | 0.302 | 0.606* | -0.071 | 0.060 | 0.163 | ||||
粗根非结构性碳水化合物 Coarse root NSC | 0.132 | 0.145 | 0.562 | 0.331 | 0.296 | 0.403 | -0.173 | -0.072 | 0.204 | -0.201 | 0.658* | 0.699* | 0.728* | 0.096 | 0.926** | 0.064 | 0.502 | 0.187 | |||
细根非结构性碳水化合物 Fine root NSC | -0.023 | 0.045 | 0.481 | 0.190 | 0.161 | 0.264 | -0.154 | -0.213 | -0.241 | -0.229 | 0.140 | 0.521 | 0.193 | 0.225 | 0.313 | 0.936** | 0.443 | 0.231 | 0.305 | ||
茎非结构性碳水化合物 Stem NSC | -0.186 | -0.186 | 0.252 | -0.042 | -0.011 | 0.038 | -0.123 | -0.255 | 0.227 | -0.200 | 0.465 | 0.417 | 0.865** | 0.079 | 0.522 | 0.278 | 0.978** | 0.215 | 0.601 | 0.391 | |
叶非结构性碳水化合物 Leaf NSC | 0.648* | 0.587 | 0.517 | 0.778** | 0.817** | 0.816** | -0.756** | 0.049 | 0.749** | -0.758** | 0.637* | 0.512 | 0.246 | 0.786** | -0.098 | 0.077 | 0.155 | 0.968** | 0.176 | 0.250 | 0.192 |
表2
主成分的相关系数、特征值、贡献率和累积贡献率"
指标 Index | 第1主成分 The first principal component | 第2主成分 The second principal component | 第3主成分 The third principal component | 第4主成分 The fourth principal component | 第5主成分 The fifth principal component |
叶生物量Leaf biomass | 0.95 | 0.21 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 0.11 |
根生物量比RMR | -0.95 | 0.12 | -0.17 | -0.04 | -0.18 |
根冠比R/S | -0.94 | 0.11 | -0.23 | -0.11 | -0.14 |
叶生物量比LMR | 0.91 | -0.07 | 0.24 | 0.07 | -0.16 |
茎生物量Stem biomass | 0.89 | 0.31 | -0.15 | 0.06 | 0.25 |
叶非结构性碳水化合物Leaf NSC | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.06 | -0.22 |
总生物量Total biomass | 0.89 | 0.41 | -0.12 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
叶可溶性糖Leaf soluble sugar | 0.86 | -0.08 | 0.05 | 0.09 | -0.26 |
相对地径生长速率RGRD | 0.85 | 0.01 | -0.15 | -0.07 | 0.43 |
相对高生长速率RGRH | 0.80 | 0.12 | -0.24 | 0.04 | 0.43 |
叶淀粉Leaf starch | 0.80 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.04 | -0.18 |
粗根可溶性糖Coarse root soluble sugar | 0.73 | 0.38 | 0.43 | -0.12 | 0.21 |
粗根淀粉Coarse root starch | -0.19 | 0.84 | 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
粗根非结构性碳水化合物Coarse root NSC | 0.14 | 0.82 | 0.48 | -0.00 | 0.15 |
根生物量Root biomass | 0.34 | 0.79 | -0.10 | 0.29 | -0.22 |
细根可溶性糖Fine root soluble sugar | 0.31 | 0.68 | 0.23 | 0.18 | -0.35 |
茎淀粉Stem starch | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.93 | 0.27 | -0.07 |
茎非结构性碳水化合物Stem NSC | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.92 | 0.16 | -0.13 |
茎可溶性糖Stem soluble sugar | 0.07 | 0.56 | 0.73 | -0.12 | -0.24 |
细根淀粉Fine root starch | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.99 | 0.00 |
细根非结构性质碳水化合物Fine root NSC | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.92 | -0.12 |
茎生物量比SMR | 0.14 | -0.12 | -0.15 | -0.09 | 0.86 |
特征值Eigenvalue variance | 9.47 | 3.52 | 3.22 | 2.13 | 1.77 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 43.05 | 15.99 | 14.65 | 9.69 | 8.03 |
累积贡献率Accumulated contribution rate (%) | 43.05 | 59.04 | 73.69 | 83.38 | 91.41 |
曹帮华, 吴丽云, 宋爱云, 等. 滨海盐碱地刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia) 混交林土壤水盐动态. 生态学报, 2008, 28 (3): 939- 945.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.03.005 |
|
Cao B H , Wu L Y , Song A Y , et al. The soil water and soil salt distribution in coastal saline-alkali area: a comparison of pure and mixed plantations. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28 (3): 939- 945.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.03.005 |
|
陈春晓, 谢秀华, 王宇鹏, 等. 盐分和干旱对沙枣幼苗生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (12): 4540- 4550. | |
Chen C X , Xie X H , Wang Y P , et al. Effects of salt and drought on the physiological characteristics of Elaeagnus angustifolia L seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39 (12): 4540- 4550. | |
成方妍, 王传宽. 树种和组织对树干非结构性碳水化合物储量估测的影响. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (2): 1- 9. | |
Cheng F Y , Wang C K . Impacts of tree species and tissue on estimation of nonstructural carbohydrates storage in trunk. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 50 (2): 1- 9. | |
杜建会, 邵佳怡, 李升发, 等. 树木非结构性碳水化合物含量多时空尺度变化特征及其影响因素进展. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31 (4): 1378- 1388. | |
Du J H , Shao J Y , Li S F , et al. Non-structural carbohydrate content of trees and its influencing factors at multiple spatial-temporal scales: a view. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31 (4): 1378- 1388. | |
冯建新, 熊德成, 史顺增, 等. 土壤增温对杉木幼苗细根生理生态性质的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (1): 35- 43. | |
Feng J X , Xiong D C , Shi S Z , et al. Effects of soil warming on the ecophysiological properties of the fine roots of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (1): 35- 43. | |
李子英, 丛日春, 杨庆山, 等. 盐碱胁迫对柳树幼苗生长和渗透调节物质含量的影. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (24): 8511- 8517. | |
Li Z Y , Cong R C , Yang Q S , et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth and osmotic adjustment substances in willow seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (24): 8511- 8517. | |
刘正祥, 张华新, 杨升, 等. NaCl胁迫对沙枣幼苗生长和光合特性的影响. 林业科学, 2014, 50 (1): 32- 40. | |
Liu Z X , Zhang H X , Yang S , et al. Effects of NaCl stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50 (1): 32- 40. | |
罗达, 史彦江, 宋锋惠, 等. 盐胁迫对平欧杂种榛幼苗生长、光合荧光特性及根系构型的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30 (10): 3376- 3384. | |
Luo D , Shi Y J , Song F H , et al. Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics, and root architecture of Corylus heterophylla×C. avellan seedlings. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30 (10): 3376- 3384. | |
孟凡娟, 王建中, 黄凤兰, 等. NaCl盐胁迫对两种刺槐叶肉细胞超微结构的影响. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32 (4): 97- 102. | |
Meng F J , Wang J Z , Huang F L , et al. Ultrastructure of mesophyll cells in two Robinia pseudoacacia hybrids under NaCl stress. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2010, 32 (4): 97- 102. | |
偶春, 胡欣, 姚侠妹, 等. 盐旱胁迫下侧柏幼苗的生理响应及水杨酸的调控作用. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33 (8): 186- 193. | |
Ou C , Hu X , Yao X M , et al. Physiological characteristics in Platycladus orientalis under salt and drought stress and regulated by SA. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33 (8): 186- 193. | |
潘庆民, 韩兴国, 白永飞, 等. 植物非结构性贮藏碳水化合物的生理生态学研究进展. 植物学通报, 2002, 19 (1): 30- 38.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2002.01.004 |
|
Pan Q M , Han X G , Bai Y F , et al. Advances in physiology and ecology studies on stored non-structure carbonhydrates in plants. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2002, 19 (1): 30- 38.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2002.01.004 |
|
史顺增, 熊德成, 冯建新, 等. 模拟氮沉降对杉木幼苗细根的生理生态影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (1): 74- 83. | |
Shi S Z , Xiong D C , Feng J X , et al. Ecophysiological effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on fine roots of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (1): 74- 83. | |
王树凤, 胡韵雪, 孙海菁, 等. 盐胁迫对2种栎树苗期生长和根系生长发育的影响. 生态学报, 2014, 34 (4): 1021- 1029. | |
Wang S F , Hu Y X , Sun H J , et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and root development of two oak seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34 (4): 1021- 1029. | |
王晓雨, 王守乐, 唐杨, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林3个主要树种的非结构性碳储存特征. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30 (5): 1608- 1614. | |
Wang X Y , Wang S L , Tang Y , et al. Characteristics of non-structural carbohydrate reserves of three dominant tree species in broadleaved Korean pine forest in Changbai Mountain, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30 (5): 1608- 1614. | |
岳小红, 曹靖, 耿杰, 等. 盐分胁迫对啤酒大麦幼苗生长、离子平衡和根际pH变化的影响. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (20): 7373- 7380. | |
Yue X H , Cao J , Geng J , et al. Effects of different types of salt stress on growth, ion balance and rhizosphere pH changes in beer barley seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38 (20): 7373- 7380. | |
张婷, 曹扬, 陈云明, 等. 生长季末期干旱胁迫对刺槐幼苗非结构性碳水化合物的影响. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30 (5): 297- 304. | |
Zhang T , Cao Y , Chen Y M , et al. Effects of drought stress on non-structural carbohydrates of Robinia pseudoacacia saplings at the end of the growing season. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30 (5): 297- 304. | |
张晓晓, 慕德宇, 李红丽, 等. NaCl胁迫对不同无性系白榆生理生化特性的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30 (8): 188- 192. | |
Zhang X X , Mu D Y , Li H L , et al. Effects of NaCl stress on physiological characteristics of Ulmus pumila L. clones. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30 (8): 188- 192. | |
张芸香, 王林, 田吉, 等. 盐碱胁迫对文冠果幼苗水力学特征和碳素分配的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33 (6): 299- 304. | |
Zhang Y X , Wang L , Tian J , et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on hydraulic characteristic and carbon allocation in Xanthoceras sorbifolia seedling. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33 (6): 299- 304. | |
赵春桥, 李继伟, 范希峰, 等. 不同盐胁迫对柳枝稷生物量、品质和光合生理的影响. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (19): 6489- 6495. | |
Zhao C Q , Li J W , Fan X F , et al. Effects of salt stress on biomass, quality, and photosynthetic physiology in Panicum virgatum. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35 (19): 6489- 6495. | |
周驰燕, 李国辉, 许轲, 等. 水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物转运机理及栽培调控研究进展. 生命科学, 2021, 33 (1): 111- 120. | |
Zhou C Y , Li G H , Xu K , et al. Advances in translocation mechanism and cultivation regulation of non-structural carbohydrate in rice stem and sheath. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences, 2021, 33 (1): 111- 120. | |
Cimato A , Castelli S , Tattini M , et al. An ecophysiological analysis of salinity tolerance in olive. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2010, 68, 214- 221.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.12.006 |
|
Cui G C , Zhang Y , Zhang W J , et al. Response of carbon and nitrogen metabolism and secondary metabolites to drought stress and salt stress in plants. Journal of Plant Biology, 2019, 62 (4): 387- 399. | |
Dietze M C , Sala A , Carbone M S , et al. Nonstructural carbon in woody plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65, 667- 687.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040054 |
|
Hartmann H , Trumbore S . Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees-from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytologist, 2016, 211, 386- 403. | |
Koyro H W . Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and solute composition of the potential cash crop halophyte Plantago coronopus L. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2006, 56 (2): 136- 146. | |
Li X B , Wan S Q , Kang Y H , et al. Chinese rose (Rosa chinensis) growth and ion accumulation under irrigation with waters of different salt contents. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 163, 180- 189. | |
Maggio A , Raimondi G , Martino A , et al. Salt stress response in tomato beyond the salinity tolerance threshold. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2007, 59 (3): 276- 282. | |
Mao P L , Zhang Y J , Cao B H , et al. Effects of salt stress on eco-physiological characteristics in Robinia pseudoacacia based on salt-soil rhizosphere. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 568, 118- 123. | |
McDowell N , Pockman W T , Allen C D , et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?. New Phytologist, 2008, 178, 719- 739. | |
O'Brien M J , Leuzinger S , Philipso C D , et al. Drought survival of tropical tree seedlings enhanced by non-structural carbohydrate levels. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 (8): 710- 714. | |
Parihar P , Singh S , Singh R , et al. Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22 (6): 4056- 4075. | |
Pushpalatha G , Subrahmanyam D , Sreenu K , et al. Effect of salt stress on seedling growth and antioxidant enzymes in two contrasting rice introgression lines. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2013, 18 (4): 360- 366. | |
Vicente O , Boscaiu M , Naranjo M A , et al. Responses to salt stress in the halophyte Plantago crassifolia (Plantaginaceae). Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 58 (4): 463- 481. | |
Yi X P , Sun Y , Yang Q , et al. Quantitative proteomics of Sesuvium portulacastrum leaves revealed that ion transportation by V-ATPase and sugar accumulation in chloroplast played crucial roles in halophyte salt tolerance. Journal of Proteomics, 2014, 99 (1): 84- 100. | |
Zhang H Y , Wang C K , Wang X C . Spatial variations in non-structural carbohydrates in stems of twelve temperate tree species. Trees, 2014, 28 (1): 77- 89. | |
Zhang T , Cao Y , Chen Y M , et al. Non-structural carbohydrate dynamics in Robinia pseudoacacia saplings under three levels of continuous drought stress. Trees, 2015, 29 (6): 1837- 1849. | |
Zheng M , Lai L , Jiang L , et al. Moderate water supply and partial sand burial increase relative growth rate of two Artemisia species in an inland sandy land. Journal of Arid Environments, 2012, 85, 105- 113. |
[1] | 温文杰,王冬梅. 青海黄土高寒区4种典型人工林树木叶片碳氮磷含量及化学计量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 22-31. |
[2] | 张梦娇, 史帅营, 刘政安, 朱学玲, 范昆, 史国安. 间伐对‘凤丹’牡丹生长、籽粒产量及品质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(1): 162-174. |
[3] | 薛海连,田相林,曹田健. 利用经验-过程混合建模方法优化华山松过程模型的参数[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(9): 21-33. |
[4] | 周紫晶,范付华,尚先文,覃慧娟,王聪慧,丁贵杰,谭健晖. 外源IAA对马尾松幼苗茎干次生生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(9): 42-51. |
[5] | 鲁乐乐,王震,张雄清,张建国. 基于贝叶斯模型平均法和逐步回归法构建杉木单木胸径生长模型[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(9): 87-97. |
[6] | 陈海波,郭丽,张真,孔祥波,张苏芳,刘福. 杨树人工林种间混交对生长性状和食叶害虫抗性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(8): 133-140. |
[7] | 张维伟,赵忠,刘金良,邓平. 桥山林区3种麻栎群落类型的种群动态与幼苗特征[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 1-10. |
[8] | 陈敏,赖华燕,郑姗姗,李明,马祥庆,吴鹏飞. 磷胁迫下外源乙烯对杉木幼苗生长及磷素利用的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 43-50. |
[9] | 王苗苗,刘勇,李国雷,彭玉信,刘春和,赵建松,王书红,蕫彪,王长伟,赵蕊蕊. 秋季施肥对毛白杨苗木质量、造林效果和养分回流的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 51-60. |
[10] | 刘卫平,宋维,高超,赵燕东. 基于活立木茎干含水量的杨树生长状态评估模型构建[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(5): 43-52. |
[11] | 欧阳白,李珠,蒋佳荔. 楸木早/晚材水分吸着与湿胀行为[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(5): 176-183. |
[12] | 王彬,于澎涛,于艺鹏,张雷,王彦辉,万艳芳,杨文娟,王顺利,刘贤德. 祁连山不同年龄青海云杉径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(3): 1-8. |
[13] | 臧颢,刘洪生,黄锦程,张祖栋,欧阳勋志,宁金魁. 竞争和气候及其交互作用对杉木人工林胸径生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(3): 39-50. |
[14] | 田相林,廖梓延,孙帅超,薛海连,王彬,曹田健. 多源数据对林分动态预测的影响及不确定性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(3): 51-66. |
[15] | 孙明慧,刘勇,王长伟,李国雷,王苗苗,宋协海,常笑超,万芳芳,宋怀山. 密度和行距配置对毛白杨苗木质量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(3): 152-160. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||