欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 101-112.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191211

• 问题讨论 • 上一篇    下一篇

陕西凤县林麝不同养殖模式的成本收益分析

熊小倩1,胡德夫1,刘宝庆2,李凯1,*   

  1. 1. 北京林业大学自然保护区学院 北京 100083
    2. 陕西省林麝养殖协会 西安 710082
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-21 出版日期:2019-12-25 发布日期:2020-01-02
  • 通讯作者: 李凯
  • 基金资助:
    林麝人工繁育标准化研究(2015HDFBHQ-HDF-001);国家林业局业务委托项目(林麝人工繁育试点2015)

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Different Breeding Modes of Forest Musk Deer (Moschus berezovskii) in Fengxian County, Shaanxi Province

Xiaoqian Xiong1,Defu Hu1,Baoqing Liu2,Kai Li1,*   

  1. 1. School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083
    2. Shaanxi Province Forest Musk Deer Farming Association Xi'an 710082
  • Received:2018-05-21 Online:2019-12-25 Published:2020-01-02
  • Contact: Kai Li
  • Supported by:
    林麝人工繁育标准化研究(2015HDFBHQ-HDF-001);国家林业局业务委托项目(林麝人工繁育试点2015)

摘要:

目的: 基于我国林麝养殖业行业标准未定、人工养麝效益问题计量不清的现状,以成本收益法分析林麝不同养殖模式下的经济效益水平。方法: 通过对我国最大林麝养殖县——陕西凤县各类典型麝场的实地调查,从规模、雌雄性比、经营目的、发展阶段的麝场养殖成本构成及收益水平等方面进行比较分析。结果: 1)麝场有仅生产麝香、仅出售幼麝、麝香+幼麝兼营3种经营目的;根据生产成本构成特点可划分为大(100只以上)、中(40~100只)、小(40只以下)型3种规模;根据经营年限不同有起步、加速发展、成熟3种阶段。2)麝场有多种养殖模式:药企投资建设的养麝公司为龙头企业,规模最大,以生产麝香为唯一目的;私人投资建设的养麝公司为专业大户,基于投入资金的多少既有中型、也有大型,以兼营麝香和幼麝为目的;家庭农场经营的中型麝场,兼营麝香和幼麝;家庭散户经营的小型麝场,起步阶段时通常以出售幼麝为主要目的。3)大、中、小型麝场平均每麝饲养成本分别为每年3 963.58、2 798.55、3 296.29元,大型麝场的单位饲养成本普遍高于中小型麝场,规模优势体现不足。4)收益水平依麝场规模、经营目的、雌雄性比和发展阶段的差异而有所区别,中小规模、雌多雄少、兼营出售麝香+幼麝、处于加速发展阶段时的单位成本收益相对更高。5)龙头企业由于单位生产成本高、养殖种群偏雄、专营麝香生产的特点,是经济效益相对最低的一种模式,但其生产的麝香在下游制药环节将创造更高的附加值。6)专业大户的生产经营特点在养麝环节中最具优势:相对于仅生产麝香的龙头企业,兼营麝香+幼麝收益更高;相对于小型麝场,抵御风险能力更强;能灵活调整养殖种群结构,以创造更大的盈利空间。结论: 基于对典型麝场麝资源结构和经营策略的分析,我国林麝养殖产业总体上呈现出良好的发展前景:宏观上看,虽近年来麝香产量的增长仍落后于林麝养殖种群规模的增长,但经营者由"繁殖炒种"向"驯养取香"转变的趋势已有显现,表明林麝养殖业正在由不成熟向成熟发展;微观上看,麝场的经营是可持续的,长期经营的麝场并没有因林麝老龄化而进入衰退期。针对一些案例暴露出的问题,建议:发展濒危野生动物人工繁育与利用须坚持保护优先原则,科学的人工繁育应同时实现保护野外种群资源和满足市场需求2个目标;龙头企业在起步阶段需要一定的政策扶持,以平稳度过效益水平低的困难时期;政府及行业协会应引导养殖大户承担相应的社会责任,减少扰乱市场的过度投机行为。

关键词: 林麝, 养殖模式, 成本核算, 收益, 陕西凤县

Abstract:

Objectve: In this study, we analyzed the economic benefit level in different business strategies, in order to fill the gap that the industrial standard of forest musk deer breeding is not determined and the cost-benefit issue still remains unclear in forest musk deer farming industry. Method: Based on the field investigation of various typical musk deer farms in Fengxian county, Shaanxi Province, the largest breeding base of musk deer in China, we calculated costs and benefits of farms in different scales, sex ratios, business goals, and stages of development. Result: 1) There are three different modes of farms according to their business goals:producing and selling musk, producing and selling breeding stocks, both producing and selling musk and breeding stocks. According to the characteristics of production cost composition, the farms can be divided into three types:large-sized farms with more than 100 forest musk deer, medium-sized farms with 40-100, and small-sized farms with less than 40. According to different business years, there are three stages of development:start-up stage, accelerated development stage and maturity stage. 2) There are many kinds of breeding modes in Musk farms:the leading enterprises, invested by pharmaceutical companies, are large-sized farms in which production of musk is the only purpose. The companies, invested and managed by professional households, are both large-sized and medium-sized, with the purpose of concurrently operating musk and breeding stocks businesses. Smaller-sized farms, run by individual households, mainly sell breeding stocks as their start-up stage, and may also sell both musk and breeding stocks afterwards. 3) The average cost per feeding a forest musk deer is 3 963.58, 2 798.55, and 3 296.29 yuan per year, respectively for large-sized farms, medium-sized farms and small-sized farms. Large-sized farms generally have higher feeding cost than small and medium-sized farms, and do not express a scale advantage. 4) The profit level is associated with the farm scale, business goal, sex ratio and development stage. Medium-sized and small-sized farms that sell both musk and breeding stocks with female outnumbering male at accelerated development stage can gain higher profit, theoretically. 5) Leading enterprises make relatively lowest profit because of high unit production cost and the only musk production. However, when the musk produced by them will create more profits in the downstream pharmaceutical chain sector. 6) The large professional households have the most advantages in musk deer raising because of the production and management characteristics that they produce and sell both musk and breeding stocks, and have stronger anti-risk ability and higher flexibility to the market. Conclusion: Based on the analysis of business strategies of typical forest musk deer farms, we believe that forest musk deer farming industry has bright prospects. Macroscopically, although the increase of musk production has lagged behind the population growth of forest musk deer in recent year, there is a trend that operators' business goal is transferring into producing musk, which indicates that forest musk deer farming industry is approaching maturity stage. Microscopically, the development of farms is sustainable:the long-term operating farms do not showed the recession due to the aging of musk deer population. In view of the problems exposed in some cases, we suggest that:to develop breeding and utilization of endangered wild animals, we should adhere to the principle of protection first. Scientific artificial breeding should achieve two goals at the same time:protecting wild population in the field and meeting the market demand. Leading enterprises need some government support during their start-up stages to smoothly pass the difficult period of low benefit level. The government and Industry Association should guide professional investors to bear their social responsibility and reduce excessive speculation.

Key words: forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii), breeding modes, cost accounting, benefits, Fengxian county, Shaanxi Province

中图分类号: