林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (5): 40-53.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250546
收稿日期:2025-09-07
修回日期:2025-12-24
出版日期:2026-05-10
发布日期:2026-05-12
通讯作者:
王云琦
E-mail:wanyunqi@bjfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Qun Zheng1,Yipu Li2,Zhongyuan Su1,Yonglin Zheng3,Yunqi Wang1,*(
)
Received:2025-09-07
Revised:2025-12-24
Online:2026-05-10
Published:2026-05-12
Contact:
Yunqi Wang
E-mail:wanyunqi@bjfu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 基于多源时空数据定量评估三峡库区重庆段土壤保持量变化,并解析各因子对其的综合驱动机制,揭示酸沉降对植被覆盖与管理因子(C)和水土保持措施因子(P)的乘积(简称复合因子C×P,用以表征地表综合抗蚀能力)的作用机制,为库区水土流失防控和生态屏障优化提供科学依据。方法: 结合2005—2020年 数字高程模型、土地利用和酸沉降等数据,利用 InVEST-SDR 模型估算土壤保持量,应用地理探测器识别土壤保持量的主控因子及因子的交互效应,采用有序 Logistic 回归和XGBoost-SHAP方法定量解释酸沉降对复合因子C×P的影响机制。结果: 1) 土壤保持总量先增后降,从2005年的6.74×1010 t增至2015年的峰值8.11×1010 t,2020年回落至7.87×1010 t;空间呈东高西低、东北部高西南部低的格局,单位面积土壤保持量的高值区(>3 000 t·hm?2a?1)多在巫溪、云阳等高郁闭度森林陡坡带,单位面积土壤保持量的低值区(<500 t·hm?2a?1)位于重庆主城区、涪陵等建设密集区。2) 2005—2020年建设用地年均扩张3.2%~7.5%,耕地主要转为林地(减少3.9%),稀疏阔叶林地退化(减少90%)。3) 酸沉降时空分异显著,总硫沉降通量由2005年的41.41 kg·hm?2a?1降至2020年的30.23 kg·hm?2a?1,总氮沉降通量由2005年的43.12 kg·hm?2a?1升至2020年的46.84 kg·hm?2a?1。4) 基于地理探测器的分析结果表明,土地利用是主控因子,酸沉降与土地利用的交互作用解释力最强(q=0.218 8)。 Logistic 回归结果表明,氮沉降对复合因子C×P数值等级提升的驱动强度约为硫沉降的8倍;基于XGBoost-SHAP 的空间解释进一步揭示酸沉降具有非线性和空间异质性,主城区和西南部为热点区。结论: 酸沉降通过化学侵蚀与生物抑制路径协同土地利用变化加剧库区土壤保持量的空间异质性,生态保护需减少氮沉降排放、修复稀疏林地、提升林地质量。
中图分类号:
郑群,李亦璞,苏中原,郑永林,王云琦. 酸沉降加剧土地利用变化对三峡库区重庆段土壤保持时空异质性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(5): 40-53.
Qun Zheng,Yipu Li,Zhongyuan Su,Yonglin Zheng,Yunqi Wang. Acid Deposition Intensifies the Impacts of Land Use Change on the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Soil Retention in the Chongqing Section of the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(5): 40-53.
表1
数据来源"
| 类别Category | 数据来源Data sources |
| 土壤类型 Soil type | 世界土壤数据库 Harmonized World Soil Database(HWSD) |
| 数字高程模型数据 Digital elevation model(DEM) | 国家气象科学数据中心 China Meteorological Data Service Centre(CMDC) |
| 降雨Rainfall | |
| 总氮沉降通量 Total nitrogen deposition flux | |
| 干性氮沉降通量 Dry nitrogen deposition flux | |
| 湿态氮沉降通量 Wet nitrogen deposition flux | |
| 总硫沉降通量 Total sulfur deposition flux | |
| 土地利用类型 Land use type | 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院 Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences(AIR-CAS) |
| 植被覆盖数据 Vegetation cover data | NASA地球观测网 NASA Earth Observation Data |
表2
研究区不同土地利用类型的C因子与P因子赋值(蔡崇法等,2000;周李磊,2020)①"
| 土地利用类型Land use type | C | P |
| 水田Irrigated cropland | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| 果园Orchard cropland | 0.32 | 0.35 |
| 旱地Rainfed cropland | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| 郁闭阔叶林地Closed broadleaved forest | 0.02 | 1 |
| 稀疏阔叶林地Open broadleaved forest | 0.18 | 1 |
| 郁闭针叶林地Closed needle-leaved forest | 0.04 | 1 |
| 稀疏针叶林地Open needle-leaved forest | 0.24 | 1 |
| 稀疏针阔混交林地Open conifer-broadleaf mixed forest | 0.15 | 1 |
| 灌木Shrubland | 0.12 | 1 |
| 草地Grassland | 0.1 | 1 |
| 建设用地Construction land | 0 | 0 |
| 裸地Bare areas | 0.22 | 1 |
| 水体Water body | 0 | 0 |
图2
三峡库区重庆段不同时期各土地利用类型单位面积土壤保持量 1:水田 Irrigated cropland;2:果园 Orchard cropland;3:旱地 Rainfed cropland;4:郁闭阔叶林 Closed broadleaved forest;5:稀疏阔叶林 Open broadleaved forest;6:郁闭针叶林 Closed needle-leaved forest;7:稀疏针叶林 Open needle-leaved forest;8:稀疏针阔混交林 Open conifer-broadleaf mixed forest;9:灌木 Shrubland;10:草地 Grassland;11:建设用地 Construction land;12:裸地 Bare areas;13:水体 Water body."
图3
三峡库区重庆段不同时期土地利用类型 1:水田 Irrigated cropland;2:果园 Orchard cropland;3:旱地 Rainfed cropland;4:郁闭阔叶林 Closed broadleaved forest;5:稀疏阔叶林 Open broadleaved forest;6:郁闭针叶林 Closed needle-leaved forest;7:稀疏针叶林 Open needle-leaved forest;8:稀疏针阔混交林 Open conifer-broadleaf mixed forest;9:灌木 Shrubland;10:草地 Grassland;11:建设用地 Construction land;12:裸地 Bare areas;13:水体 Water body."
|
蔡崇法, 丁树文, 史志华, 等. 应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究. 水土保持学报, 2000, 14 (2): 19- 24.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.02.005 |
|
|
Cai C F, Ding S W, Shi Z H, et al. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 14 (2): 19- 24.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2000.02.005 |
|
| 范宇阳, 孟和达来, 洪美静, 等. 赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区生态系统服务时空格局及驱动因素分析. 环境科学, 2025, 47 (2): 1049- 1061. | |
| Fan Y Y, Meng H D L, Hong M J, et al. Spatiotemporal pattern and driving factors of the ecosystem services in Saihanwula Nature Reserve. Environmental Science, 2025, 47 (2): 1049- 1061. | |
| 胡 波, 王云琦, 王玉杰, 等. 重庆缙云山3种典型林分对酸沉降的作用机理. 水土保持学报, 2013 (2): 1- 7. | |
| Hu B, Wang Y Q, Wang Y J, et al. The action mechanism of acid deposition of different forest types in Jinyun Mountain. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013 (2): 1- 7. | |
| 刘 睿, 周李磊, 彭 瑶, 等. 三峡库区重庆段土壤保持服务时空分布格局研究. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25 (6): 932- 942. | |
| Liu R, Zhou L L, Peng Y, et al. Spatio-temporal variations of soil conservation services in Three Gorges Reservoir area of Chongqing. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2016, 25 (6): 932- 942. | |
| 孟浩斌, 周启刚, 李明慧, 等. 三峡库区生态系统服务时空变化及权衡与协同关系研究. 生态与农村环境学报, 2021, 37 (5): 566- 575. | |
| (Meng H B, Zhou Q G, Li M H, et al. Study of the spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem services and trade-offs/synergies relationship in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021, 37 (5): 566- 575. | |
|
唐辉明. 三峡库区滑坡与河谷协同演化机制. 科学通报, 2025, 70 (21): 3505- 3515.
doi: 10.1360/TB-2024-1225 |
|
|
Tang H M. Mechanism of the coevolution of landslides and river valleys in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2025, 70 (21): 3505- 3515.
doi: 10.1360/TB-2024-1225 |
|
|
田 宇, 朱建华, 李 奇, 等. 三峡库区土壤保持时空分布特征及其驱动力. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39 (4): 1164- 1174.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202004.019 |
|
|
Tian Y, Zhu J H, Li Q, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil conservation and its driving forces in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39 (4): 1164- 1174.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202004.019 |
|
|
王 华, 徐浩森, 邓燕青, 等. 流域土地利用类型变化对鄱阳湖入湖水质的驱动特征. 水资源保护, 2025, 41 (4): 244- 252.
doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2025.04.028 |
|
|
Wang H, Xu H S, Deng Y Q, et al. Driving characteristics of watershed land use type changes on water quality of inflow rivers to Poyang Lake. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41 (4): 244- 252.
doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2025.04.028 |
|
|
王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望. 地理学报, 2017, 72 (1): 116- 134.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010 |
|
|
Wang J F, Xu C D. Geodetector: principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72 (1): 116- 134.
doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010 |
|
| 王 琳, 陈 展, 尚 鹤. 外生菌根真菌在酸雨胁迫下对马尾松土壤微生物代谢功能的影响. 林业科学, 2014, 50 (7): 99- 104. | |
| Wang L, Chen Z, Shang H. Effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Pisolithus tinctorius) of masson pine (Pinus massoniana) on soil microbial metabolic function under simulated acid rain. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50 (7): 99- 104. | |
|
王兆林, 鄂施璇, 陈军利. 近40年来三峡库区农村人口与居民点用地演变脱钩及驱动效应分析. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38 (13): 273- 284.
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.13.030 |
|
|
Wang Z L, E S X, Chen J L. Decoupling of rural population and settlement in the Three Gorges Reservoir areas in the past 40 years and its driving effect. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38 (13): 273- 284.
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.13.030 |
|
| 杨建和, 肖 莉, 黄川雄, 等. 三峡库区腹地地形因子空间差异及其对CSLE模型结果的影响. 中国水土保持科学, 2025, 23 (1): 40- 50. | |
| Yang J H, Xiao L, Huang C X, et al. Spatial difference of terrain factors in the hinterland of Three Gorges Reservoir area and its influence on the results of CSLE model. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2025, 23 (1): 40- 50. | |
|
张思颖, 陈荣蓉, 程 先. 重庆龙溪河流域水生态系统服务时空演变及对土地利用变化响应. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37 (4): 173- 183.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.023 |
|
|
Zhang S Y, Chen R R, Cheng X. Spatiotemporal changes of water-related ecosystem services and the responses to land use changes of the Longxi River Basin, Chongqing. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 37 (4): 173- 183.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.04.023 |
|
|
张宇洁, 张晓萍, 孙伟楠, 等. 1970—2020年北洛河流域产水、保土、固碳生态系统服务时空演变特征与权衡/协同关系. 水土保持学报, 2025, 39 (2): 365- 377.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.02.026 |
|
|
Zhang Y J, Zhang X P, Sun W N, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and trade-offs/synergies of water yield, soil conservation, and carbon storage ecosystem services in the Beiluo River Basin from 1970 to 2020. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2025, 39 (2): 365- 377.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2025.02.026 |
|
| 章文波, 付金生. 不同类型雨量资料估算降雨侵蚀力. 资源科学, 2003, 25 (1): 35- 41. | |
| Zhang W B, Fu J S. Rainfall erosivity estimation under different rainfall amount. Resources Science, 2003, 25 (1): 35- 41. | |
|
郑永林, 王云琦, 徐晓晓, 等. 重庆缙云山马尾松和润楠径向生长的酸雨响应. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (1): 58- 67.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230012 |
|
|
Zheng Y L, Wang Y Q, Xu X X, et al. The acid rain response of radial growth of Pinus massoniana and Machilus nanmu in Jinyun Mountains of Chongqing. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (1): 58- 67.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230012 |
|
| 周李磊. 2020. 长江上游湿地生态系统服务评估及多情景模拟. 重庆: 重庆大学. | |
| Zhou L L. 2020. Evaluation and multi-scenario simulation of wetland ecosystem services in the upper Yangtze River. Chongqing: Chongqing University. [in Chinese] | |
| 朱君琳, 刘 敏, 王云琦, 等. 酸沉降强度对马尾松土壤活性铝的影响. 森林与环境学报, 2024, 44 (4): 376- 386. | |
| Zhu J L, Liu M, Wang Y Q, et al. Effects of acid deposition intensity on active aluminum in Pinus massoniana soil. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2024, 44 (4): 376- 386. | |
|
Bai J Z, Zhou Z X, Li J, et al. Predicting soil conservation service in the Jinghe River Basin under climate change. Journal of Hydrology, 2022, 615, 128646.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128646 |
|
|
Chen C, Xiao W Y, Chen H Y H. Mapping global soil acidification under N deposition. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29 (16): 4652- 4661.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.16813 |
|
|
Chen J S, Chen Y P, Wang K B, et al. Impacts of land use, rainfall, and temperature on soil conservation in the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2024, 239, 107883.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2024.107883 |
|
|
Chen L, Rejesus R M, Aglasan S, et al. The impact of cover crops on soil erosion in the US Midwest. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022a, 324, 116168.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116168 |
|
|
Chen Z J, Geng S C, Zhou X Y, et al. Nitrogen addition decreases soil aggregation but enhances soil organic carbon stability in a temperate forest. Geoderma, 2022b, 426, 116112.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116112 |
|
|
Huang C B, Cheng J, Liu S S, et al. Impacts of landscape dynamics on terrestrial ecosystem health in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 467, 142928.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142928 |
|
|
Jian Z, Sun Y J, Wang F, et al. Soil conservation ecosystem service supply-demand and multi scenario simulation in the Loess Plateau, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024, 49, e02796.
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02796 |
|
|
Jin F M, Yang W C, Fu J X, et al. Effects of vegetation and climate on the changes of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau of China. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 773, 145514.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145514 |
|
|
Kavian A, Alipour A, Soleimani K, et al. The increase of rainfall erosivity and initial soil erosion processes due to rainfall acidification. Hydrological Processes, 2019, 33 (2): 261- 270.
doi: 10.1002/hyp.13323 |
|
|
Lang Y Q, Yang X H, Cai H Y. Quantifying anthropogenic soil erosion at a regional scale–The case of Jiangxi Province, China. Catena, 2023, 226, 107081.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107081 |
|
|
Li X L, Wang Y Q, Zhang Y, et al. Response of soil chemical properties and enzyme activity of four species in the Three Gorges Reservoir area to simulated acid rain. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 208, 111457.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111457 |
|
|
Liu Z Q, Chen J Y, Su Z J, et al. Acid rain reduces plant-photosynthesized carbon sequestration and soil microbial network complexity. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 873, 162030.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162030 |
|
|
Lü Y N, Wang C Y, Jia Y Y, et al. Effects of sulfuric, nitric, and mixed acid rain on litter decomposition, soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activities in subtropical forests of China. Applied Soil Ecology, 2014, 79, 1- 9.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.12.002 |
|
|
Peng X D, Dai Q H. Drivers of soil erosion and subsurface loss by soil leakage during karst rocky desertification in SW China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2022, 10 (2): 217- 227.
doi: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.10.001 |
|
|
Sartori M, Ferrari E, M’Barek R, et al. Remaining loyal to our soil: a prospective integrated assessment of soil erosion on global food security. Ecological Economics, 2024, 219, 108103.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108103 |
|
|
Su Z Y, Wang Y Q, Zheng Y L, et al. Acid deposition and meteorological factors together drive changes in vegetation cover in acid rain areas. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 167, 112720.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112720 |
|
|
Teng M J, Huang C B, Wang P C, et al. Impacts of forest restoration on soil erosion in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 697, 134164.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134164 |
|
|
Tu A G, Zheng H J, Mo M H, et al. Effect of hillslope profile shape on runoff and soil erosion in red soil hilly areas of China using the WEPP model. Journal of Hydrology, 2025, 655, 132914.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132914 |
|
|
Wang K L, Zhou J, Tan M L, et al. Impacts of vegetation restoration on soil erosion in the Yellow River Basin, China. Catena, 2024, 234, 107547.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107547 |
|
|
Wang X H, Li S, Zhu B, et al. Long-term nitrogen deposition inhibits soil priming effects by enhancing phosphorus limitation in a subtropical forest. Global Change Biology, 2023, 29 (14): 4081- 4093.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.16718 |
|
|
Wei H, Liu Y L, Zhang J E, et al. Leaching of simulated acid rain deteriorates soil physiochemical and mechanical properties in three agricultural soils. Catena, 2021, 206, 105485.
doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105485 |
|
|
Williams J R, Renard K G, Dyke P T. EPIC: a new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1983, 38 (5): 381- 383.
doi: 10.1080/00224561.1983.12436327 |
|
|
Zhang B, Fang H Y, Wu S F, et al. Soil erosion prediction and spatiotemporal heterogeneity in driving effects of precipitation and vegetation on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024a, 459, 142561.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142561 |
|
|
Zhang L Y, Wang J, Wang S X, et al. Chemical characteristics of long-term acid rain and its impact on lake water chemistry: a case study in southwest China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2024b, 138, 121- 131.
doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2023.03.028 |
|
|
Zhang Y, Li J H, Tan J Y, et al. An overview of the direct and indirect effects of acid rain on plants: relationships among acid rain, soil, microorganisms, and plants. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 873, 162388.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162388 |
|
|
Zhao J L, Wang Z G, Dong Y F, et al. How soil erosion and runoff are related to land use, topography and annual precipitation: insights from a meta-analysis of erosion plots in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 802, 149665.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149665 |
|
|
Zheng J, Arif M, Li L J, et al. Dam inundation reduces ecosystem multifunctionality following riparian afforestation in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 360, 121188.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121188 |
|
|
Zhou K Y, Xu W, Zhang L, et al. Estimating nitrogen and sulfur deposition across China during 2005 to 2020 based on multiple statistical models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2023, 23 (15): 8531- 8551.
doi: 10.5194/acp-23-8531-2023 |
| [1] | 徐彩瑶,王朝勇,穆亚丽,孔凡斌,廖文梅. 中国林业经济韧性非均衡性及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 196-214. |
| [2] | 张翱,李文婷,王天祥,武耀星,雷刚,漆良华. 毛竹林土壤易氧化有机碳区域分异及影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(6): 1-12. |
| [3] | 田志会;王有年. 北京山区果园生态系统土壤保持功能及其生态经济价值估算——以北京市平谷区果园为例[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(12): 165-171. |
| [4] | 谈建康 孔繁翔. 酸沉降和铝对马尾松菌根共生体碳代谢影响[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(6): 23-27. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||