林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (7): 100-112.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250644
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
王浩1,郭宇翔1,陈晨1,刘思凡2,刘赞2,何钢2,刘年元3,曾艳玲1,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-10-27
修回日期:2026-04-20
出版日期:2026-07-10
发布日期:2026-07-14
通讯作者:
曾艳玲
E-mail:zengyanling110@csuft.edu.cn
基金资助:
Hao Wang1,Yuxiang Guo1,Chen Chen1,Sifan Liu2,Zan Liu2,Gang He2,Nianyuan Liu3,Yanling Zeng1,*(
)
Received:2025-10-27
Revised:2026-04-20
Online:2026-07-10
Published:2026-07-14
Contact:
Yanling Zeng
E-mail:zengyanling110@csuft.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 挖掘三年桐功能内生细菌资源,筛选高效溶磷菌株,为后续开发其他植物在石漠化地区的促生菌剂提供科学基础。方法: 选取健康无病虫害的三年桐分离根、茎、叶内生细菌,采用溶磷圈初筛和钼锑抗比色法复筛获得溶磷菌株;结合16S rRNA序列鉴定菌株;通过Ashby培养观察、凯氏定氮法和Salkowski法等对比分析溶磷细菌固氮、产IAA和拮抗枯萎病的能力;开展溶磷细菌处理三年桐/千年桐盆栽试验,对比分析生长指标、生理参数和营养元素积累量。结果: 分离获得31种真菌细菌,其中洋葱伯克霍尔德菌RP2的溶磷能力最强(459.64 mg·L–1),具备高效固氮(53.12 mg·g–1干菌质量)和产IAA(97.54 μg·mL–1)能力;三年桐接种RP2后株高增幅达68.5%(77 cm 对比对照组均值45.7 cm),地上部鲜质量提高98.2%(111 g对比56 g);三年桐根系磷含量显著提升88.6%(RP2组6.695 mg·g–1对比对照组3.55 mg·g–1);黏质沙雷氏菌RP3具有高效溶磷能力(399.10 mg·L–1);伯克霍尔德菌RP2和水生芽孢杆菌SP4兼具溶磷与尖孢镰刀菌拮抗能力。结论: 在三年桐体内发现并验证伯克霍尔德菌RP2和沙雷氏菌RP3多功能促生菌,其可显著促进油桐属林木生长,为绿色环保促生菌剂开发提供核心资源。
中图分类号:
王浩,郭宇翔,陈晨,刘思凡,刘赞,何钢,刘年元,曾艳玲. 三年桐内溶磷促生菌的筛选及其促生效应[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(7): 100-112.
Hao Wang,Yuxiang Guo,Chen Chen,Sifan Liu,Zan Liu,Gang He,Nianyuan Liu,Yanling Zeng. Screening of Endophytic Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria from Vernicia fordii and Their Growth-Promoting Effects[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(7): 100-112.
表1
菌株溶磷能力及酶活性分析①"
| 菌株 Strain | 溶磷圈 Phosphate solubilizing halo(D/d) | 溶磷能力 Phosphate solubilization capacity/(mg·L–1) | 酸性磷酸酶活性 Acid phosphatase activity/(U·g–1) | 植酸酶活性 Phytase activity/ (U·g–1) | ACC酶活 ACC deaminase activity/(U·g–1) |
| RP1 | 1.8±0.1c | 218.32±11.5c | 28.4±1.2c | 2.1±0.2c | 0.68±0.06d |
| RP2 | 2.5±0.1a | 459.64±20.3a | 45.3±1.8a | 5.8±0.3a | 12.45±0.58a |
| RP3 | 2.3±0.1b | 399.10±18.1b | 38.7±1.5b | 4.2±0.3b | 8.71±0.42b |
| SP4 | 1.9±0.1c | 223.12±12.7c | 31.2±1.4c | 3.1±0.2c | 6.93±0.35c |
| CK | — | — | — | — | — |
表2
不同菌株处理对根系形态指标及根际ACC酶含量的影响①"
| 树种 Species | 处理 Treatment | 根长 Root length/cm | 根投影面积 Root projected area/cm2 | 根表面积 Root surface area/cm2 | 根体积 Root volume/cm3 | 平均根径 Average root diameter/mm | 根际ACC酶含量 Rhizosphere ACC deaminase content/(nmol·g–1) |
| 三年桐 Vernicia fordii | CK | 830.21±118.97c | 135.40±42.48d | 425.37±74.29d | 17.34±5.15b | 1.63±0.25a | 0.82±0.09a |
| RP1 | 797.67±36.55c | 80.46±36.34e | 252.76±74.07e | 6.37±2.98c | 1.01±0.10d | 0.75±0.07b | |
| RP2 | 168.39±10.85c | 529.01±34.08c | 17.48±1.83b | 1.32±0.03b | 0.38±0.04e | ||
| RP3 | 203.47±27.84b | 639.23±87.46b | 19.09±4.08b | 1.19±0.03c | 0.45±0.05d | ||
| SP4 | 226.17±47.98a | 710.55±50.75a | 29.81±7.10a | 1.68±0.08a | 0.61±0.06c | ||
| 千年桐 Vernicia montana | CK | 910.46±105.80d | 116.87±21.50d | 367.16±67.54d | 11.78±2.41d | 1.28±0.04a | 0.88±0.11a |
| RP1 | 138.48±27.94d | 435.04±46.28d | 13.14±2.21d | 1.21±0.05b | 0.79±0.08b | ||
| RP2 | 254.07±45.01a | 798.17±34.40a | 25.50±5.64a | 1.28±0.03a | 0.35±0.05d | ||
| RP3 | 219.61±4.51b | 689.93±14.17b | 21.64±0.99b | 1.25±0.01ab | 0.41±0.04c | ||
| SP4 | 201.09±8.54c | 631.74±26.83c | 19.15±1.51c | 1.21±0.02b | 0.58±0.07c |
表3
不同菌株处理对三年桐和千年桐营养元素积累的影响①"
| 树种 Species | 处理 Treatment | 氮含量 (地上部) N content (shoot)/ (mg·g–1) | 氮含量 (地下部) N content (root)/ (mg·g–1) | 磷含量 (地上部) P content (shoot)/ (mg·g–1) | 磷含量 (地下部) P content (root)/(mg·g–1) | 地上部 氮∶磷 Shoot N∶P ratio | 地下部 氮∶磷 Root N∶P ratio | 钾含量 (地上部) K content (shoot)/(mg·g–1) | 钾含量 (地下部) K content (root)/(mg·g–1) |
| 三年桐 Vernicia fordii | CK | 18.32±0.38b | 19.10±0.27d | 3.18±0.15c | 3.55±0.16c | 5.76 | 5.38 | 17.82±0.73d | 19.14±0.75d |
| RP1 | 18.58±0.47b | 20.79±0.71c | 2.54±0.28d | 3.33±0.12d | 7.31 | 6.24 | 19.38±0.13c | 26.16±0.85c | |
| RP2 | 20.03±1.07a | 27.26±0.41a | 4.13±0.22a | 6.70±0.10a | 4.85 | 4.07 | 26.84±0.39a | 30.55±2.80a | |
| RP3 | 18.58±0.47b | 24.36±0.46b | 3.87±0.28b | 4.46±0.21b | 4.8 | 5.46 | 19.16±0.82c | 30.21±1.90a | |
| SP4 | 18.76±0.93b | 22.13±1.37c | 3.55±0.54c | 3.79±0.09c | 5.28 | 5.84 | 22.94±1.18b | 22.60±1.05b | |
| 千年桐 Vernicia montana | CK | 23.03±0.76b | 18.97±0.22e | 3.26±0.15d | 3.87±0.20c | 7.06 | 4.9 | 16.37±0.64d | 20.63±1.73d |
| RP1 | 11.41±0.00e | 20.40±0.07d | 3.70±0.00c | 4.18±0.00b | 3.08 | 4.88 | 15.32±0.00e | 25.47±0.00c | |
| RP2 | 17.29±3.04d | 28.05±0.38a | 4.24±0.17b | 6.76±0.14a | 4.08 | 4.15 | 26.05±0.39a | 36.54±0.00a | |
| RP3 | 18.55±1.06c | 23.47±0.56c | 3.96±0.31b | 4.05±0.21b | 4.68 | 5.79 | 18.50±1.04c | 26.36±0.00b | |
| SP4 | 24.55±2.80a | 24.87±0.06b | 4.57±0.55a | 3.80±0.09c | 5.37 | 6.54 | 24.52±1.00b | 24.59±2.06c |
表4
主成分载荷矩阵"
| 变量Variable | PC1 载荷 PC1 loading | PC2 载荷 PC2 loading |
| 土壤蔗糖酶活性Soil invertase activity | 0.992 | –0.021 |
| 土壤酸性磷酸酶活性 Soil acid phosphatase activity | 0.989 | 0.045 |
| 土壤β-葡萄糖苷酶活性 Soil β-glucosidase activity | 0.987 | –0.032 |
| 固氮 Nitrogen fixation | 0.985 | 0.112 |
| 溶磷 Phosphate solubilization | 0.982 | 0.056 |
| 土壤植酸酶活性Soil phytase activity | 0.978 | –0.058 |
| 产IAA IAA production | 0.975 | 0.152 |
| 千年桐地下钾Potassium in underground part of Vernicia montana | 0.965 | 0.118 |
| 三年桐地下钾Potassium in underground part of Vernicia fordii | 0.963 | 0.121 |
| 土壤脲酶活性Soil urease activity | 0.96 | –0.105 |
| 卜春亚, 孙 晔, 张天蔚, 等. 一株草莓根腐尖孢镰刀菌拮抗内生细菌的分离鉴定及抑菌特性. 应用与环境生物学报, 2014, 20 (2): 300- 304. | |
| Bu C Y, Sun Y, Zhang T W, et al. Isolation, identification and antibacterial properties of endophytic bacteria antagonizing Fusarium oxysporum in a strawberry root rotting strain. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2014, 20 (2): 300- 304. | |
| 丁玥诚, 熊富民, 雷 聪, 等. 石漠化地区油桐根际土壤微生物特性的研究. 湖南林业科技, 2025, 52 (1): 53- 59, 72. | |
| Ding Y C, Xiong F M, Lei C, et al. Study on the characteristics of root-associated microorganisms of Vernicia fordii in adaptation to stonified habitats. Hunan Forestry Science & Technology, 2025, 52 (1): 53- 59, 72. | |
| 葛淼淼, 薄永琳, 刘 宸, 等. 土壤产铁载体细菌的筛选及其对铁氧化物的活化与利用. 微生物学通报, 2023, 50 (3): 1062- 1072. | |
| Ge M M, Bo Y L, Liu C, et al. Screening of soil siderophore-producing bacteria and their activation and utilization of iron oxide. Microbiology China, 2023, 50 (3): 1062- 1072. | |
| 黄慧岳, 谢达平. 2012. 自生固氮菌的筛选及其在灭菌土壤中的生长特性. 湖南农业科学, (11): 20–22. | |
| Huang H Y, Xie D P. 2012. Screening of abiogenous Azotobacter and its growth characteristics in the sterilized soil. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, (11): 20–22. [in Chinese] | |
|
李锐霞, 黄思源, 陈文镪, 等. 解磷微生物的解磷机制及应用进展. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52 (24): 23- 29.
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2024.24.004 |
|
|
Li R X, Huang S Y, Chen W Q, et al. Mechanism and application progress of phosphorus solubilizing microorganisms. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52 (24): 23- 29.
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2024.24.004 |
|
| 李莹飞, 耿玉清, 周红娟, 等. 基于不同方法测定土壤酸性磷酸酶活性的比较. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24 (1): 98- 104. | |
| Li Y F, Geng Y Q, Zhou H J, et al. Comparison of soil acid phosphatase activity determined by different methods. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24 (1): 98- 104. | |
| 林海燕, 刘昌伟, 杨 勇, 等. 茶树根和叶内生细菌的多样性及来源分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 49 (6): 675- 683. | |
| Lin H Y, Liu C W, Yang Y, et al. Diversity and source analysis of endophytic bacteria in tea roots and leaves. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2023, 49 (6): 675- 683. | |
|
刘 驰, 李家宝, 芮俊鹏, 等. 16S rRNA基因在微生物生态学中的应用. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (9): 2769- 2788.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201306181726 |
|
|
Liu C, Li J B, Rui J P, et al. The applications of the 16S rRNA gene in microbial ecology: current situation and problems. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35 (9): 2769- 2788.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201306181726 |
|
| 刘玉兰, 吴金梅, 邓秀月, 等. 一株具解磷功能细菌菌株的鉴定及其生物学功能. 核农学报, 2025, 39 (7): 1425- 1433. | |
| Liu Y L, Wu J M, Deng X Y, et al. Identification of a bacterial strain with phosphorus-solubilizing function and its biological function. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 39 (7): 1425- 1433. | |
| 刘志伟, 黄玉亭, 张铁鹰, 等. 2006. 国标法测定植酸酶活性存在问题的探讨. 中国饲料 (18): 29–31. | |
| Liu Z W, Huang Y T, Zhang T Y, et al. 2006. The problem about the measurement of phytase activity with GB method. China Feed, (18): 29–31. [in Chinese] | |
| 欧阳玉莹, 洪 滔, 洪陈洁, 等. 不同内生真菌对缺磷条件下千年桐幼苗生长及C、N、P和K含量的影响. 植物资源与环境学报, 2017, 26 (4): 32- 44. | |
| Ouyang Y Y, Hong T, Hong C J, et al. Effects of different endophytic fungi on growth and contents of C, N, P, and K of seedlings of Aleurites montana under phosphorus deficiency condition. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2017, 26 (4): 32- 44. | |
| 潘忠飞. 2025. 油茶根际溶磷菌的筛选及其应用效果研究. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学. | |
| Pan Z F. 2025. Screening of rhizospheric phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from Camellia oleifera and its application effect. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology. [in Chinese] | |
| 谭晓风. 油桐的生产现状及其发展建议. 经济林研究, 2006, 24 (3): 62- 64. | |
| Tan X F. Status and suggestion on development of Vernicia fordii. Nonwood Forest Research, 2006, 24 (3): 62- 64. | |
| 王琪媛, 王甲辰, 叶 磊, 等. 含ACC脱氨酶的根际细菌提高植物抗盐性的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37 (2): 174- 186. | |
| Wang Q Y, Wang J C, Ye L, et al. Research advances on enhancement of plant resistance to salinity stress by rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37 (2): 174- 186. | |
| 吴启叶, 卢丽娜, 刘迎龙, 等. 四株革兰氏阴性细菌的红绿色荧光蛋白标记及其生物学特性研究. 生物技术通报, 2024, 40 (12): 239- 247. | |
| Wu Q Y, Lu L N, Liu Y L, et al. Four strains of gram-negative bacteria labeled with red and green fluorescent proteins and their biological characterization. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2024, 40 (12): 239- 247. | |
|
武怡荷, 胡会玲, 陈书明, 等. 四株儿茶酚类铁载体高产菌株产消化酶活性及其益生特性. 微生物学通报, 2020, 47 (6): 1807- 1816.
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.190720 |
|
|
Wu Y H, Hu H L, Chen S M, et al. Digestive enzymes and probiotic properties of four bacteria with high yield catechol siderophore. Microbiology China, 2020, 47 (6): 1807- 1816.
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.190720 |
|
|
武志江, 李业燕, 王亚军, 等. 百合枯萎病拮抗细菌的筛选、鉴定及其抑菌物质研究. 微生物学通报, 2015, 42 (7): 1307- 1320.
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.140752 |
|
|
Wu Z J, Li Y Y, Wang Y J, et al. Isolation and identification of an antagonistic bacterium against Fusarium on lily and its antifungal substances. Microbiology China, 2015, 42 (7): 1307- 1320.
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.140752 |
|
| 谢安强, 洪 伟, 吴承祯. 桉树内生菌对尾巨桉幼苗抗寒生理指标的影响. 林业科学, 2012, 48 (6): 170- 174. | |
| Xie A Q, Hong W, Wu C Z. Effects of endophytic fungi on cold resistance physiological indices of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48 (6): 170- 174. | |
| 徐 聪, 张飞宇, 俞道远, 等. 土壤动物的分子分类预测策略评估. 生物多样性, 2022, 30 (12): 186- 199. | |
| Xu C, Zhang F Y, Yu D Y, et al. Performance evaluation of molecular taxonomy assignment tools for soil invertebrates. Biodiversity Science, 2022, 30 (12): 186- 199. | |
| 许佳露, 张 平, 李美芳, 等. 产铁载体菌株的分离、培养条件优化及初步应用. 微生物学通报, 2022, 49 (3): 1004- 1016. | |
| Xu J L, Zhang P, Li M F, et al. Isolation, optimization of culture conditions and preliminary application of siderophore-producing strains. Microbiology China, 2022, 49 (3): 1004- 1016. | |
|
杨 顺, 杨 婷, 林 斌, 等. 两株溶磷真菌的筛选、鉴定及溶磷效果的评价. 微生物学报, 2018, 58 (2): 264- 273.
doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20170112 |
|
|
Yang S, Yang T, Lin B, et al. Isolation and evaluation of two phosphate-dissolving fungi. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2018, 58 (2): 264- 273.
doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20170112 |
|
|
袁志林, 陈益存, 汪阳东. 一种新发生的油桐叶枯病病原真菌. 菌物学报, 2011, 30 (4): 658- 662.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2013.08.077 |
|
|
Yuan Z L, Chen Y C, Wang Y D. A new leaf blight pathogen of Vernicia fordii. Mycosystema, 2011, 30 (4): 658- 662.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9944.2013.08.077 |
|
|
张昊鑫, 王中华, 牛 兵, 等. 产IAA兼具溶磷解钾高效促生菌的筛选、鉴定及其广谱性应用. 生物技术通报, 2022, 38 (5): 100- 111.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-1557 |
|
|
Zhang H X, Wang Z H, Niu B, et al. Screening, identification and broad-spectrum application of efficient IAA-producing bacteria dissolving phosphorus and potassium. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2022, 38 (5): 100- 111.
doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2021-1557 |
|
|
张静怡, 赵龙飞, 刘梦洁. 植物内生菌多样性、功能及应用研究进展. 微生物学报, 2025, 65 (4): 1446- 1468.
doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250012 |
|
|
Zhang J Y, Zhao L F, Liu M J. Progress in research concerning the diversity, function, and application of plant endophytes. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2025, 65 (4): 1446- 1468.
doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250012 |
|
|
张云霞, 雷 鹏, 许宗奇, 等. 一株高效解磷菌Bacillus subtilis JT-1的筛选及其对土壤微生态和小麦生长的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2016, 32 (5): 1073- 1080.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.019 |
|
|
Zhang Y X, Lei P, Xu Z Q, et al. Screening of a high-efficiency phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Bacillus subtilis JT-1 and its effects on soil microecology and wheat growth. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 32 (5): 1073- 1080.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.019 |
|
| 周志军, 杨宇元, 王 浩, 等. 矮壮素和多效唑处理对油桐幼苗生长及生理特性的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45 (6): 43- 54. | |
| Zhou Z J, Yang Y Y, Wang H, et al. Effects of chlormequat and paclobutrazol treatments on the growth and physiological characteristics of Vernicia fordii seedlings. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45 (6): 43- 54. | |
|
朱常锐, 覃颖婷, 李思锐, 等. 蚕豆内生细菌的分离鉴定及对桑树幼苗促生机制研究. 蚕业科学, 2025, 51 (2): 97- 110.
doi: 10.13441/j.cnki.cykx.20250023 |
|
|
Zhu C R, Qin Y T, Li S R, et al. Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria from Vicia faba and study on their growth-promoting mechanism to mulberry seedlings. Acta Sericologica Sinica, 2025, 51 (2): 97- 110.
doi: 10.13441/j.cnki.cykx.20250023 |
|
|
Kuźniar A, Kruczyńska A, Włodarczyk K, et al. Endophytes as permanent or temporal inhabitants of different ecological niches in sustainable agriculture. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15 (3): 1253.
doi: 10.3390/app15031253 |
|
|
Liao C F, Doilom M, Jeewon R, et al. Challenges and update on fungal endophytes: classification, definition, diversity, ecology, evolution and functions. Fungal Diversity, 2025, 131 (1): 301- 367.
doi: 10.1007/s13225-025-00550-5 |
|
|
Lu Y Z, Ding Z W, Ding J, et al. Design and evaluation of universal 16S rRNA gene primers for high-throughput sequencing to simultaneously detect DAMO microbes and anammox bacteria. Water Research, 2015, 87 (3): 385- 394.
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.042 |
|
| Saini J, Saluja M, Chhuneja P, et al. 2014. Rapid isolation of genomic DNA from Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, the cause of wheat powdery mildew, using CTAB method. Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, 51(2): 150–153. | |
|
Vandana U K, Rajkumari J, Singha L P, et al. The endophytic microbiome as a hotspot of synergistic interactions, with prospects of plant growth promotion. Biology, 2021, 10 (2): 101.
doi: 10.3390/biology10020101 |
|
|
Zahra S T, Tariq M, Abdullah M, et al. Dominance of Bacillus species in the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere and their plant growth promoting potential under salt stress conditions. PeerJ, 2023, 11, e14621.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.14621 |
|
|
Zhou Z J, Wang X R, Chen C, et al. Agroforestry system: Polygonatum odoratum and Vernicia fordii intercropping effects on crop quality, soil nutrients and microbial community structure. Agroforestry Systems, 2025, 99 (4): 85.
doi: 10.1007/s10457-025-01183-y |
| [1] | 王亚聪, 王迪, 田红雨, 王照玉, 史晓梦, 冉隆贤. 外源诱导尾叶桉非培养内生细菌的激活[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(9): 66-74. |
| [2] | 李梓杨,陈晓琳,李丽丽,许诗萍,何苑皞. 油茶根系与内生细菌枯草芽孢杆菌互作早期的转录组分析[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(3): 48-58. |
| [3] | 李永丽,王亚红,常乐,余海如,周洲,赵文霞,曲良建. 新疆野苹果树内生细菌分离与鉴定及其对3种苹果病原菌的抑制作用[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 97-104. |
| [4] | 傅慧静,胡霞,吴松青,王荣,梁光红,黄世国,张飞萍. 松褐天牛幼虫肠道黏质沙雷氏菌培养条件与木质素降解功能[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(2): 106-115. |
| [5] | 韦宜慧,陈嘉琪,赵光宇,董玉红,厚凌宇,焦如珍. 杉木林土壤和苗木内生溶磷细菌的筛选及其溶磷特性[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(12): 1-9. |
| [6] | 王瑫;李永;朴春根;汪来发;朱天辉. 2种杨树可培养内生细菌的多样性和季节动态变化[J]. , 2013, 49(5): 135-146. |
| [7] | 陆俊锟 陈 俊;康丽华 杨振德. 华南红树林溶磷菌16S rDNA PCR-RFLP分析及其溶磷能力*[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(5): 137-142. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||