林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 224-235.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250413
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
杨春梅1,2,单重阳1,2,吴晓峰3,*(
),周建波3,张北航3,李全罡3,羿宏雷3,李芝茹3,谭志域3,张卫国3
收稿日期:2025-06-26
修回日期:2025-07-29
出版日期:2026-06-10
发布日期:2026-06-13
通讯作者:
吴晓峰
E-mail:286710269@qq.com
基金资助:
Chunmei Yang1,2,Chongyang Shan1,2,Xiaofeng Wu3,*(
),Jianbo Zhou3,Beihang Zhang3,Quangang Li3,Honglei Yi3,Zhiru Li3,Zhiyu Tan3,Weiguo Zhang3
Received:2025-06-26
Revised:2025-07-29
Online:2026-06-10
Published:2026-06-13
Contact:
Xiaofeng Wu
E-mail:286710269@qq.com
摘要:
目的: 针对油茶机械化嫁接过程中存在的夹持力过大嫁接苗易损伤、切削力过大穗木苗易滑落等问题,开展油茶嫁接苗木力学特性试验研究,为油茶自动化嫁接设备的设计与优化提供参考。方法: 以“长林系列53号”油茶苗木为研究对象,通过测量物理特征参数并统计分析数据得到苗木的主要物理特性。结合嫁接技术标准,对2种苗木(砧木和穗木)分3组分别进行径向压缩试验、三点弯曲试验,依据Box-Behnken试验原理进行剪切试验,采用响应曲面法分析刀具刃角、加载速度和苗木直径对剪切强度的影响。结果: 砧木苗直径范围2.72~4.48 mm、平均直径3.16 mm、平均质量2.34 g、平均含水率80.12%;穗木苗直径范围2.03~3.50 mm、平均直径2.75 mm、平均质量1.84 g、平均含水率81.34%。砧木苗平均峰值压缩力、最大压缩量分别为139.4 N和0.78 mm;穗木苗平均峰值压缩力、最大压缩量分别为198.1 N和0.70 mm。砧木苗平均峰值弯曲力、平均弯曲弹性模量和平均抗弯强度分别为8.24 N、29.007 MPa和8.168 MPa;穗木苗平均峰值弯曲力、平均弯曲弹性模量和平均抗弯强度分别为8.20 N、23.346 MPa和18.497 MPa。砧木和穗木平均剪切强度分别为1.445和3.025 MPa,最大剪切力分别为24.65和24.83 N,苗木直径和刀具刃角对剪切强度具有显著影响,加载速度对剪切强度无显著影响。结论: 径向压缩试验结果表明,砧木苗和穗木苗的峰值压缩力、最大压缩量均随直径增加而增大。三点弯曲试验结果表明,砧木苗和穗木苗的峰值弯曲力随直径增大而增大,其中砧木试样的抗弯强度整体小于穗木试样,且砧木试样的脆性大于穗木试样。剪切试验结果表明,砧木的剪切强度随刀具刃角减小而降低,随砧木直径增大而提高;穗木的剪切强度随刀具刃角减小而逐渐降低,随穗木直径增大呈先微降后急升的趋势。2种苗木的剪切强度随加载速度增加呈先下降后上升的变化趋势,且加载在穗木苗的夹持力范围应为100~150 N,加载在砧木苗的夹持力不应超过90 N。
中图分类号:
杨春梅,单重阳,吴晓峰,周建波,张北航,李全罡,羿宏雷,李芝茹,谭志域,张卫国. 面向自动嫁接成型装置的油茶苗木力学特性[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(6): 224-235.
Chunmei Yang,Chongyang Shan,Xiaofeng Wu,Jianbo Zhou,Beihang Zhang,Quangang Li,Honglei Yi,Zhiru Li,Zhiyu Tan,Weiguo Zhang. Mechanical Properties of Camellia oleifera Seedlings Matched to Automated Grafting Devices[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(6): 224-235.
表2
苗木径向压缩试验结果"
| 组别 Groups | 试验次数 Test frequency | 砧木 Rootstock | 穗木 Scion | |||
| 最大压缩量 Max. compression amount /mm | 峰值压缩力 Max. compression force/N | 最大压缩量 Max. compression amount/mm | 峰值压缩力 Max. compression force/N | |||
| A | 1 | 0.57 | 94.6 | 0.48 | 158.3 | |
| 2 | 0.75 | 112.5 | 0.60 | 167.9 | ||
| 3 | 0.69 | 109.6 | 0.54 | 160.1 | ||
| 平均Average | 0.67 | 105.6 | 0.54 | 162.1 | ||
| B | 1 | 0.75 | 137.6 | 0.71 | 196.9 | |
| 2 | 0.81 | 143.6 | 0.69 | 202.3 | ||
| 3 | 0.78 | 139.8 | 0.79 | 199.7 | ||
| 平均Average | 0.78 | 140.3 | 0.73 | 199.6 | ||
| C | 1 | 0.87 | 169.8 | 0.84 | 230.3 | |
| 2 | 0.90 | 172.6 | 0.79 | 233.6 | ||
| 3 | 0.93 | 174.6 | 0.87 | 233.4 | ||
| 平均Average | 0.9 | 172.3 | 0.83 | 232.4 | ||
表3
苗木三点弯曲试验结果"
| 组别 Groups | 试验次数 Test frequency | 砧木Rootstock | 穗木Scion | |||||
| 弯曲弹性模量 Bending elastic modulus/MPa | 峰值弯曲力 Max. bending force/N | 抗弯强度 Bending strength/MPa | 弯曲弹性模量 Bending elastic modulus/MPa | 峰值弯曲力 Max. bending force/N | 抗弯强度 Bending strength/MPa | |||
| A | 1 | 35.562 | 4.18 | 7.652 | 23.786 | 3.78 | 17.835 | |
| 2 | 34.521 | 5.37 | 7.967 | 23.907 | 3.23 | 17.512 | ||
| 3 | 39.356 | 5.16 | 7.945 | 20.083 | 4.12 | 17.703 | ||
| 平均Average | 36.480 | 4.90 | 7.855 | 22.592` | 3.71 | 17.683 | ||
| B | 1 | 27.019 | 7.15 | 8.278 | 19.211 | 8.6 | 18.335 | |
| 2 | 21.674 | 8.27 | 8.248 | 20.587 | 8.92 | 18.435 | ||
| 3 | 20.525 | 6.30 | 8.235 | 22.082 | 10.11 | 18.880 | ||
| 平均Average | 23.073 | 7.24 | 8.254 | 20.627 | 9.21 | 18.550 | ||
| C | 1 | 32.665 | 11.11 | 8.392 | 26.725 | 11.62 | 19.674 | |
| 2 | 23.060 | 12.30 | 8.401 | 30.905 | 11.84 | 18.929 | ||
| 3 | 26.687 | 14.33 | 8.395 | 22.826 | 11.54 | 19.166 | ||
| 平均Average | 27.471 | 12.58 | 8.396 | 26.819 | 11.67 | 19.256 | ||
表5
苗木剪切试验结果"
| 试验号 Test number | X1/ (°) | X2/ (mm·min?1) | X3/mm | X4/mm | Y1/MPa | Y2/MPa | Y3/N | Y4/N |
| 1 | 8.80 | 200 | 2.72 | 2.03 | 0.879 | 3.208 | 5.11 | 10.38 |
| 2 | 18.10 | 300 | 4.48 | 3.50 | 1.559 | 2.992 | 24.57 | 28.79 |
| 3 | 8.80 | 300 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.357 | 2.737 | 13.81 | 16.37 |
| 4 | 18.10 | 100 | 2.72 | 2.03 | 1.184 | 3.558 | 6.88 | 11.52 |
| 5 | 18.10 | 200 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.585 | 2.769 | 16.13 | 16.57 |
| 6 | 27.40 | 200 | 2.72 | 2.03 | 1.368 | 3.799 | 7.95 | 12.30 |
| 7 | 18.10 | 200 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.533 | 2.836 | 15.60 | 16.97 |
| 8 | 27.40 | 300 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.833 | 3.040 | 18.66 | 18.19 |
| 9 | 8.80 | 100 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.392 | 2.744 | 14.17 | 16.42 |
| 10 | 18.10 | 200 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.526 | 2.616 | 15.53 | 15.65 |
| 11 | 8.80 | 200 | 4.48 | 3.50 | 1.339 | 2.861 | 21.10 | 27.53 |
| 12 | 27.40 | 200 | 2.72 | 3.50 | 1.368 | 3.070 | 7.94 | 29.54 |
| 13 | 18.10 | 200 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.561 | 2.736 | 15.88 | 16.37 |
| 14 | 27.40 | 100 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.839 | 3.051 | 18.72 | 18.25 |
| 15 | 18.10 | 100 | 4.48 | 3.50 | 1.564 | 2.997 | 24.65 | 28.83 |
| 16 | 18.10 | 200 | 3.60 | 2.76 | 1.509 | 2.777 | 15.36 | 16.61 |
| 17 | 18.10 | 300 | 2.72 | 2.03 | 1.163 | 3.642 | 6.76 | 11.79 |
表6
砧木剪切强度回归模型方差分析①"
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 剪切强度Shear strength | |||
| 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | F | P | |
| 模型Model | 0.926 9 | 9 | 155.45 | < 0.000 1** |
| X1 | 0.386 1 | 1 | 582.82 | < 0.000 1** |
| X2 | 0.000 6 | 1 | 0.846 9 | 0.388 0 |
| X3 | 0.301 3 | 1 | 454.80 | < 0.000 1** |
| X1X2 | 0.000 2 | 1 | 0.590 8 | |
| X1X3 | 0.005 1 | 1 | 7.67 | 0.027 7* |
| X2X3 | 0.000 1 | 1 | 0.096 6 | 0.765 0 |
| X12 | 0.000 2 | 1 | 0.260 3 | 0.625 6 |
| X22 | 0.013 2 | 1 | 19.97 | 0.002 9** |
| X32 | 0.225 4 | 1 | 340.14 | < 0.000 1** |
| 残差Residual | 0.004 6 | 7 | ||
| 失拟Lack of fit | 0.001 0 | 3 | 0.368 9 | 0.780 6 |
| 误差Error | 0.003 6 | 4 | ||
| 总和Total sum | 0.931 6 | 16 | ||
表7
穗木剪切强度回归模型方差分析①"
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 剪切强度Shear strength | |||
| 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 Degrees of freedom | F | P | |
| 模型 Model | 1.87 | 9 | 42.06 | < 0.000 1** |
| X1 | 0.248 2 | 1 | 50.24 | 0.000 2** |
| X2 | 0.000 5 | 1 | 0.097 3 | 0.764 2 |
| X4 | 0.653 8 | 1 | 132.36 | < 0.000 1** |
| X1X2 | 2.250e-06 | 1 | 0.000 5 | 0.983 6 |
| X1X4 | 0.036 5 | 1 | 7.39 | 0.029 9* |
| X2X4 | 0.002 0 | 1 | 0.400 9 | 0.546 7 |
| X12 | 0.007 3 | 1 | 1.48 | 0.263 9 |
| X22 | 0.045 8 | 1 | 9.28 | 0.018 7* |
| X42 | 0.837 9 | 1 | 169.63 | < 0.000 1** |
| 残差Residual | 0.034 6 | 7 | ||
| 失拟Lack of fit | 0.008 0 | 3 | 0.400 7 | 0.760 8 |
| 误差Error | 0.026 6 | 4 | ||
| 总和Total sum | 1.90 | 16 | ||
|
陈国婵, 郭晓春, 蒙进芳, 等. 广南县油茶芽苗砧嫁接育苗技术研究. 四川林业科技, 2021, 42 (6): 112- 119.
doi: 10.12172/202103180001 |
|
|
Chen G C, Guo X C, Meng J F, et al. Study on grafting seedlings technology of Camellia oleifera bud rootstock in Guangnan County. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 42 (6): 112- 119.
doi: 10.12172/202103180001 |
|
|
段玉振, 王家胜, 张峰峰, 等. 茄科蔬菜嫁接秧苗几何及力学特性试验研究. 农业工程, 2018, 8 (1): 89- 92.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1795.2018.01.031 |
|
|
Duan Y Z, Wang J S, Zhang F F, et al. Experimental research on geometrics and mechanics of solanceous vegetable seedlings for grafting. Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 8 (1): 89- 92.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1795.2018.01.031 |
|
|
傅 童, 郑 航, 薛向磊, 等. 茶树嫩梢形态与力学特性试验研究. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36 (6): 1425- 1435.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230692 |
|
|
Fu T, Zheng H, Xue X L, et al. Experimental study on morphological and mechanical properties of tea tree shoot tips. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36 (6): 1425- 1435.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20230692 |
|
|
龚守富, 朱赞彬. 6个油茶果实经济性状及茶油品质比较分析. 森林工程, 2022, 38 (3): 40- 46.
doi: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2022.03.003 |
|
|
Gong S F, Zhu Z B. Comparative analysis of economic characters and tea oil quality of six Camellia oleifera varieties. Forest Engineering, 2022, 38 (3): 40- 46.
doi: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2022.03.003 |
|
| 弓满锋, 李 炅, 李 华, 等. 面向机器人采摘的芒果果实与果梗力学特性试验. 农机化研究, 2025, 47 (11): 169- 176. | |
| Gong M F, Li J, Li H, et al. Experimental on mechanical properties of mango and its stem for robotic picking. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2025, 47 (11): 169- 176. | |
|
郭宇辉, 邓勇杰, 胡淑芬, 等. 黄精须根剪切力学特性试验研究. 江西农业大学学报, 2025, 47 (1): 193- 204.
doi: 10.3724/aauj.2025018 |
|
|
Guo Y H, Deng Y J, Hu S F, et al. Experimental study on shear mechanical properties of fibrous roots of Polygonatum sibiricum. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2025, 47 (1): 193- 204.
doi: 10.3724/aauj.2025018 |
|
|
李达华. 油茶发展前景及高效种植技术. 世界热带农业信息, 2025 (4): 24- 26.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1726.2025.04.009 |
|
|
Li D H. Development prospect and efficient planting techniques of Camellia oleifera. World Tropical Agriculture Information, 2025 (4): 24- 26.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1726.2025.04.009 |
|
| 李业鑫. 2023. 基于力学数值模型的青花椒枝条切割机理和切枝装置研究. 重庆: 西南大学. | |
| Li Y X. 2023. Research on the cutting mechanism of green pepper branches and cutting device based onmechanical numerical model. Chongqing: Southwest University. [in Chinese] | |
|
李志萌, 张宜红, 杨志诚. 乡村振兴战略背景下我国油茶产业发展研究. 农林经济管理学报, 2017, 16 (6): 809- 816.
doi: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2017.06.16 |
|
|
Li Z M, Zhang Y H, Yang Z C. Research on the development of oil tea industry in the background of rural revitalization strategy. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2017, 16 (6): 809- 816.
doi: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2017.06.16 |
|
|
林圣博, 王邦追, 吴美玲, 等. 香葱葱白机械载荷损伤力学特性表征. 浙江农业学报, 2024, 36 (11): 2627- 2634.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231388 |
|
|
Lin S B, Wang B Z, Wu M L, et al. Characterization of mechanical properties of scallion white under mechanical load damage. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2024, 36 (11): 2627- 2634.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.20231388 |
|
|
刘 然, 周建波, 苗振坤, 等. 油茶嫁接苗无纺布育苗容器开袋条件与力学试验分析. 林业科学, 2025, 61 (8): 1- 10.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240499 |
|
|
Liu R, Zhou J B, Miao Z K, et al. Analysis of opening conditions and mechanical tests for non-woven seedling containers of Camellia oleifera grafted seedlings. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61 (8): 1- 10.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240499 |
|
| 刘晓瑞, 檀瑞龙, 高垚垚, 等. 柠条茎秆锯切性能参数分析与试验研究. 森林工程, 2025, 41 (5): 1042- 1053. | |
| Liu X R, Tan R L, Gao Y Y, et al. The analysis and experimental study of sawing performance parameters of Caragana korshinskii stems. Forest Engineering, 2025, 41 (5): 1042- 1053. | |
| 牟英辉, 辜 松, 马稚昱. 瓜类嫁接苗生物力学特性的试验分析. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28 (4): 15- 20. | |
| Mu Y H, Gu S, Ma Z Y. Experimental analysis on biomechanical properties of cucurbits grafted seedlings. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28 (4): 15- 20. | |
| 任子超, 雷 金, 彭 霞, 等. 沙棘枝杆力学特性试验研究. 农机化研究, 2024, 46 (7): 146- 151. | |
| Ren Z C, Lei J, Peng X, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of sea buckthorn branches. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2024, 46 (7): 146- 151. | |
|
史 诺, 郭康权, 范宇杰, 等. 棉秆挤压剥皮剪切力学特性试验. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33 (18): 51- 58.
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.18.007 |
|
|
Shi N, Guo K Q, Fan Y J, et al. Peeling and shearing mechanical performance test of cotton stalks in extrusion state. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33 (18): 51- 58.
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.18.007 |
|
|
滕绍民, 王泽群, 李 洋, 等. 切割方式与切割阻力的理论研究. 农机化研究, 2009, 31 (5): 89- 90, 96.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-188X.2009.05.024 |
|
|
Teng S M, Wang Z Q, Li Y, et al. The theory study of the cutting ways and cutting resistance. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2009, 31 (5): 89- 90, 96.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-188X.2009.05.024 |
|
| 王 俊, 杜冬冬, 胡金冰, 等. 蔬菜机械化收获技术及其发展. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45 (2): 81- 87. | |
| Wang J, Du D D, Hu J B, et al. Vegetable mechanized harvesting technology and its development. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2014, 45 (2): 81- 87. | |
|
王 琪, 林恒矗, 廖 鹏, 等. 茶叶茎秆剪切力特性. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 51 (3): 428- 432.
doi: 10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2022.03.019 |
|
|
Wang Q, Lin H C, Liao P, et al. Shearing mechanical properties of tea stem. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 51 (3): 428- 432.
doi: 10.13323/j.cnki.j.fafu(nat.sci.).2022.03.019 |
|
|
吴映桐, 吴子鸣, 张立军, 等. 皇冠梨静压力学特性及模拟研究. 包装工程, 2023, 44 (19): 50- 57.
doi: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2023.19.007 |
|
|
Wu Y T, Wu Z M, Zhang L J, et al. Static pressure mechanical properties and simulation of Huangguan pears. Packaging Engineering, 2023, 44 (19): 50- 57.
doi: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2023.19.007 |
|
|
谢 伟, 孟德鑫, 蒋 蘋, 等. 面向夹持采收的油菜薹茎、枝、叶生物力学特性试验. 江西农业大学学报, 2023, 45 (6): 1504- 1516.
doi: 10.13836/j.jjau.2023138 |
|
|
Xie W, Meng D X, Jiang P, et al. Experimental study on biomechanical characteristics of rape shoot stems, twigs and leaves in clamping harvesting. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2023, 45 (6): 1504- 1516.
doi: 10.13836/j.jjau.2023138 |
|
|
徐瑞华, 黄广杰, 王方艳, 等. 基于Box-Behnken响应面法的生姜力学特性试验研究. 中国农机化学报, 2024, 45 (10): 126- 130,192.
doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.10.019 |
|
|
Xu R H, Huang G J, Wang F Y, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of ginger based on Box-Behnken response surface method. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2024, 45 (10): 126- 130,192.
doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.10.019 |
|
| 荀桂森, 王家胜, 张建新. 成熟收割期韭菜几何及力学特性试验. 农业工程, 2020, 10 (6): 94- 97. | |
| Xun G S, Wang J S, Zhang J X. Experimental research on geometrics and mechanics of Chinese leek in mature harvesting period. Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 10 (6): 94- 97. | |
|
杨春梅, 单重阳, 周建波, 等. 油茶苗自动嫁接成型装置设计与工艺参数优化. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45 (2): 202- 215.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2025.02.020 |
|
|
Yang C M, Shan C Y, Zhou J B, et al. Design and processing parameter optimization of automatic grafting machine for oil tea seedling. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45 (2): 202- 215.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2025.02.020 |
|
| 杨一帆, 黄 河, 吴海波, 等. 秋季施肥对不同砧木类型红松嫁接苗生长、生理及开花的影响. 森林工程, 2023, 38 (5): 11- 21. | |
| Yang Y F, Huang H, Wu H B, et al. Effects of autumn fertilization on growth, physiology and flowering of Korean pine grafted seedlings with different rootstocks. Forest Engineering, 2023, 38 (5): 11- 21. | |
|
张 婷, 李建安, 龚玉子, 等. 湖南省5个主推油茶早中熟品种授粉配置技术. 林业科学, 2025, 61 (4): 153- 168.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230655 |
|
|
Zhang T, Li J A, Gong Y Z, et al. Pollination configuration technology of five early-to mid-maturing Camellia oleifera varieties recommended in Hunan Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61 (4): 153- 168.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230655 |
|
| 张亚敏. 加快油茶产业发展三年行动方案印发. 国土绿化, 2023 (1): 42. | |
| Zhang Y M. Three-year action plan to accelerate the Camellia oleifera industry released. Land Greening, 2023 (1): 42. | |
| 周成强, 练东明, 郑仁红, 等. 油茶芽苗砧嫁接育苗技术研究. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50 (21): 114- 118. | |
| Zhou C Q, Lian D M, Zheng R H, et al. Study on grafting seedling technology of Camellia oleifera. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50 (21): 114- 118. | |
|
Mahboob Z, El Sawi I, Zdero R, et al. Tensile and compressive damaged response in flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2017, 92, 118- 133.
doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.007 |
|
|
Melnyk C W, Meyerowitz E M. Plant grafting. Current Biology, 2015, 25 (5): 183- 188.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.029 |
|
| Mohamed M K, Mahmoud M M, Ali W Y. Frictional behaviour of the cylindrical protrusions and holes in rubber surfaces sliding on ceramics. Kgk-Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe, 2012, 65 (11/12): 37- 40. | |
|
Reeves G, Tripathi A, Singh P, et al. Monocotyledonous plants graft at the embryonic root-shoot interface. Nature, 2022, 602 (7896): 280- 286.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04247-y |
|
|
Ruan C J, Mopper S. High-crown grafting to increase low yields in Camellia oleifera. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 2017, 92 (4): 439- 444.
doi: 10.1080/14620316.2017.1283969 |
| [1] | 刘延鹤,周建波,傅万四,张彬,常飞虎,何文. 基于高频热压成型的竹集成材制备及力学性能评价[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(8): 131-140. |
| [2] | 王正, 卢尧, 谢文博, 高子震, 丁叶蔚, 付海燕. 正交胶合木(CLT)梁剪应力分析及其层间剪切强度测试[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 152-158. |
| [3] | 许威, 花军, 张绍群, 陈光伟. 基于SHPB试验的桦木压缩动力学特性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(5): 95-101. |
| [4] | 李秧秧 石辉 邵明安. 黄土丘陵区乔灌木叶水分利用效率及与水力学特性关系[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(2): 67-73. |
| [5] | 江泽慧 姜笑梅 周玉成 安源 赵亮 井元伟. 杉木微观结构与其品质特性关系模型的一类神经网络建模方法[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(4): 133-139. |
| [6] | 程瑞香 顾继友. 落叶松木材API胶粘剂弦径面胶接强度的差异[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(4): 157-161. |
| [7] | 殷幼平,程惊秋,蒋书楠. 桑粒肩天牛纤维素酶的性质研究[J]. 林业科学, 1996, 32(5): 454-459. |
| [8] | 陆从进. 单板层积材的加速老化性能研究[J]. , 1990, 26(5): 448-451. |
| [9] | 鲍甫成 胡荣. 泡桐木材流体渗透性与扩散性的研究[J]. , 1990, 26(3): 239-246. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||