欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 99-108.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240414

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市森林公园生态系统文化服务的公众偏好与感知

白晓航1,2,3,*(),陈洁萍2   

  1. 1. 安徽省国土空间规划与生态研究院 合肥 230601
    2. 东南大学建筑学院 南京210096
    3. 云南省林业和草原科学院 国家林业和草原局珍稀濒特森林植物保护和繁育重点实验室 云南省森林植物培育与开发利用重点实验室 昆明 650204
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-05 出版日期:2025-06-10 发布日期:2025-06-26
  • 通讯作者: 白晓航 E-mail:xhbai627@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省国土空间规划与生态研究院开放课题(GTY2021201);云南省林业和草原科学院重点实验室基金项目 (KFJJ202304);国家自然科学基金项目(42101097)。

Public Preference and Perception for Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Forest Parks

Xiaohang Bai1,2,3,*(),Jieping Chen2   

  1. 1. Anhui Institute of Territorial Space Planning and Ecology Hefei 230601
    2. School of Architecture, Southeast University Nanjing 210096
    3. Yunnan Academy of Forestry and Grassland Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Plants of National Forestry and Grassland Administration  Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Forest Resources Development of Yunnan Province Kunming 650204
  • Received:2024-07-05 Online:2025-06-10 Published:2025-06-26
  • Contact: Xiaohang Bai E-mail:xhbai627@126.com

摘要:

目的: 基于社交媒体平台的在线评论数据与实地调查数据,量化公众对南京城市森林公园生态系统文化服务的感知与偏好,助力公众满意度提升与公园精准管控,促进城市森林公园生态空间优化与可持续管理。方法: 在南京典型森林公园内,通过实地调研、社交媒体数据分析和自然语言处理技术,基于“重要性-满意度”分析模型,量化公众对生态系统文化服务的感知、偏好和影响。结果: 1)公众对美学欣赏服务和休闲游憩服务高度认可,而对情感连接服务、灵感获取服务及文化传承服务的满意度较低,服务之间存在供需错位,亟需提升公众的精神和情感需求类服务。2)年轻群体偏爱教育认知服务和休闲游憩服务,而老年群体偏爱健康促进服务和情感连接服务;男性偏爱休闲游憩服务和健康促进服务,而女性偏爱美学欣赏服务、教育认知服务和情感连接服务。3)可达性与使用频次促进社会交流服务、情感连接服务和健康促进服务,因此需加强森林公园的可达性建设。4)不同职业群体对生态系统文化服务具有各自的独特需求和偏好,因此需完善智慧景观系统提升服务体验,激励公众参与公园管理与建设。结论: 不同年龄、性别、可达性、使用频次和职业背景的访客对生态系统文化服务的偏好存在显著差异,公园管理需采取政策支持、个性化服务、科技融合和社区参与等差异化服务策略,为城市森林公园生态空间的科学规划和管理提供有力支撑。

关键词: 生态系统文化服务, 感知, 满意度, 森林公园, 服务功能

Abstract:

Objective: To quantify public perception and preference towards the cultural ecosystem services of urban forest parks in Nanjing using online review data from social media platforms and field survey data. This will aid in enhancing public satisfaction and precise management, and facilitate the optimization and sustainable management of urban forest park ecological spaces. Method: Within typical forest parks in Nanjing, field research, social media data analysis, and natural language processing techniques were employed. Based on the “importance-satisfaction” analysis model, the public’s perception, preferences, and impacts on cultural ecosystem services were quantified. Result: 1) The public highly recognizes aesthetic appreciation and leisure recreation services but has lower satisfaction with emotional connection, inspiration acquisition, and cultural heritage services. There is a mismatch between supply and demand among these services, indicating an urgent need to enhance services catering to the public’s spiritual and emotional needs. 2) Younger individuals prefer educational and cognitive services and leisure recreation, while older individuals favor health promotion and emotional connection services. Men prefer leisure recreation and health promotion services, whereas women are more inclined towards aesthetic appreciation, educational and cognitive services, and emotional connection services. 3) Accessibility and usage frequency enhance social interaction, emotional connection, and health promotion services, highlighting the importance of improving accessibility within forest parks. 4) Different occupational groups have their unique needs and preferences for cultural ecosystem services, which can be leveraged by smart landscape systems to enhance service experiences and motivate public participation in park management and development. Conclusion: Visitors of different ages, genders, accessibility levels, usage frequencies, and occupational backgrounds exhibit significant differences in their preferences for cultural ecosystem services. Park management should adopt differentiated service strategies encompassing policy support, personalized services, technology integration, and community participation. These strategies will provide robust support for the scientific management and ecological space planning of urban forest park.

Key words: cultural ecosystem services, perception, satisfaction, forest park, service function

中图分类号: