陈 娟, 李春阳. 2014. 环境胁迫下雌雄异株植物的性别响应差异及竞争关系. 应用与环境生物学报, 20(4): 743-750. (Chen J, Li C Y. 2014. Sex-specific responses to environmental stresses and sexual competition of dioecious plants. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 20(4): 743-750.[in Chinese]) 陈小梅, 危 晖, 林媚珍. 2014. 气候变化对雌雄异株植物影响的研究进展. 生态学杂志, 33(11): 3144-3149. (Chen X M, Wei H, Lin M Z. 2014. Responses of dioecious plants to climate change: A review on the potential mechanisms. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33(11): 3144-3149.[in Chinese]) 高 丽, 杨 劼, 刘瑞香. 2010. 不同土壤水分条件下中国沙棘雌雄株叶片形态结构及生理生化特征. 应用生态学报, 21(9): 2201-2208. (Gao L, Yang J, Liu R X. 2010. Leaf morphological structure and physiological and biochemical characteristics of female and male Hippophae Rhamnoides subsp. sinensis under different soil moisture condition. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(9): 2201-2208.[in Chinese]) 郭学民, 高忠明, 刘振林, 等. 2010. 美国红梣雄株和雌株茎导管分子的形态解剖比较. 林业科学, 46(8): 51-55. (Guo X M, Gao Z M, Liu Z L, et al. 2010. Comparative anatomy of vessel elements in staminate and pistillate plants of Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 46(8): 51-55.[in Chinese]) 金 燕, 卢宝荣. 2003. 遗传多样性的取样策略. 生物多样性, 11(2): 155-161. (Jin Y, Lu B R. 2003. Sampling strategy for genetic diversity. Biodiversity Science, 11(2): 155-161.[in Chinese]) 刘瑞香, 杨 劼, 高 丽. 2005. 中国沙棘和俄罗斯沙棘叶片在不同土壤水分条件下脯氨酸、可溶性糖及内源激素含量的变化. 水土保持学报, 19(3): 148-151. (Liu R X, Yang J, Gao L. 2005. Changes in contents of proline, soluble saccharin and endogenous hormone in leaves of Chinese Seabuckthorn and Russian Seabuckthorn under different soil water content. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 19(3): 148-151.[in Chinese]) 刘 芸, 钟章成, 王小雪, 等. 2010. 栝楼雌雄植株激素和多胺含量的比较. 园艺学报, 37(10): 1645-1650. (Liu Y, Zhong Z C, Wang X X, et al. 2010. Comparison in contents of endogenous hormones and polyamines in female and male plants of Trichosanthes kirilowii. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 37(10): 1645-1650.[in Chinese]) 马丽媛, 齐国辉, 李保国, 等. 2013. 黄连木雌、雄株内源植物激素和POD同工酶的比较. 植物科学学报, 31(3): 297-303. (Ma L Y, Qi G H, Li B G, et al. 2013. Content of endogenous phytohormones and isoenzymes of peroxidase in male and female Pistacia chinensis plants Bunge leaves. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 31(3): 297-303.[in Chinese]) 陶应时, 廖咏梅, 黎云祥, 等. 2013. 连香树雌雄株叶片形态及生理生化指标比较. 东北林业大学学报, 41(3): 18-19, 39. (Tao Y S, Liao Y M, Li Y X, et al. 2013. Morphological-characteristics and physiological-biochemical indexes of male and female Cercidiphyllum japonicum. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 41(3): 18-19, 39.[in Chinese]) 王白坡, 程晓建, 戴文圣, 等. 1999. 银杏雌雄株内源激素和核酸的变化. 浙江林学院学报, 16(2): 114-118. (Wang B P, Cheng X J, Dai W S, et al. 1999. Changes of endogenous phytohormones and nucleic acids in male and female plants of Ginkgo biloba. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 16(2): 114-118.[in Chinese]) 胥 晓, 杨 帆, 尹春英, 等. 2007. 雌雄异株植物对环境胁迫响应的性别差异研究进展. 应用生态学报, 18(11): 2626-2631. (Xu X, Yang F, Yin C Y, et al. 2007. Research advances in sex-specific responses of dioecious plants to environmental stresses. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18(11): 2626-2631.[in Chinese]) 杨 鹏, 胥 晓. 2011. 青杨雌雄幼苗对主要矿质元素的吸收与分配差异. 植物研究, 31(2): 188-192. (Yang P, Xu X. 2011. Differences in absorption and distribution of main mineral elements between male and female Populus cathayana seedlings. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 31(2): 188-192.[in Chinese]) 杨 鹏, 胥 晓. 2012. 淹水胁迫对青杨雌雄幼苗生理特性和生长的影响. 植物生态学报, 36(1): 81-87. (Yang P, Xu X. 2012. Effects of waterlogging stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of male and female Populus cathayana seedlings. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 36(1): 81-87.[in Chinese]) 杨赵平, 刘 琴, 李志军. 2011. 胡杨雌雄株叶片的比较解剖学研究. 西北植物学报, 31(1): 79-83. (Yang C P, Liu Q, Li Z J. 2011. Leaf Blade Comparative Anatomy between the Female and the Male of Populus euphratica Oliv. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 31(1): 79-83.[in Chinese]) 詹亚光, 纪丽丽, 亓 磊, 等. 2006. 水曲柳雌雄株酚类物质和几种氧化酶活性的比较. 林业科学, 42(7): 131-136. (Zhan Y G, Ji L L, Qi L, et al. 2006. The phenolic substances and several oxydases in female and male plants for Fraxinus mandshurica. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 42(7): 131-136.[in Chinese]) 张明如, 温国胜, 张 瑾, 等. 2012. 火炬树雌雄母株克隆生长差异及其光合荧光日变化. 生态学报, 32(2): 528-537. (Zhang M R, Wen G S, Zhang J, et al. 2012. Differences in clonal growth between female and male plants of Rhus typhina Linn. and their diurnal changes in photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(2): 528-537.[in Chinese]) 赵延霞, 骆有庆, 宗世祥, 等. 2012. 不同沙棘品种雌雄株叶片解剖结构及抗旱性比较. 北京林业大学学报, 34(6): 34-41. (Zhao Y X, Luo Y Q, Zong S X, et al. 2012. Comparison in leaf anatomical structure and drought resistance of different sex and varieties of sea buckthorn. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 34(6): 34-41.[in Chinese]) hman I. 1997. Growth, herbivory and disease in relation to gender in Salix viminalis L. Oecologia, 111(1): 61-68. Álvarez-Cansino L, Zunzunegui M, Díaz Barradas M C, et al. 2010. Physiological performance and xylem water isotopic composition underlie gender-specific responses in the dioecious shrub Corema album. Physiologia plantarum, 140(1): 32-45. Aryal R, Ming R. 2014. Sex determination in flowering plants: Papaya as a model system. Plant Science, 217/218: 56-62. Barradas M C D, Correia O. 1999. Sexual dimorphism, sex ratio and spatial distribution of male and female shrubs in the dioecious species Pistacia lentiscus L. Folia Geobotanica, 34(1): 163-174. Barrett S C H, Hough J. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(1): 67-82. Barrett S C H, Yakimowski S B, Field D L, et al. 2010. Ecological genetics of sex ratios in plant populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1552): 2549-2557. Boecklen W J, Price P W, Mopper S. 1990. Sex and drugs and herbivores: sex-biased herbivory in arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis). Ecology, 71(2): 581-588. Cepeda-Cornejo V, Dirzo R. 2010. Sex-related differences in reproductive allocation, growth, defense and herbivory in three dioecious neotropical palms. PloS One, 5(3): e9824. Chen F, Chen L, Zhao H, et al. 2010a. Sex-specific responses and tolerances of Populus cathayana to salinity. Physiologia Plantarum, 140(2): 163-173. Chen L, Zhang S, Zhao H, et al. 2010b. Sex-related adaptive responses to interaction of drought and salinity in Populus yunnanensis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 33(10): 1767-1778. Chen F, Zhang S, Jiang H, et al. 2011. Comparative proteomics analysis of salt response reveals sex-related photosynthetic inhibition by salinity in Populus cathayana cuttings. Journal of Proteome Research, 10(9): 3944-3958. Cornelissen T, Stiling P. 2005. Sex-biased herbivory: ameta-analysis of the effects of gender on plant-herbivore interactions. Oikos, 111(3): 488-500. Correia O, Barradas M C D. 2000. Ecophysiological differences between male and female plants of Pistacia lentiscus L. Plant Ecology, 149(2): 131-142. Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray. Diggle P K, Di Stilio V S, Gschwend A R, et al. 2011. Multiple developmental processes underlie sex differentiation in angiosperms. Trends in Genetics, 27(9): 368-376. Esfandiyari B, Davarynejad G H, Shahriari F, et al. 2012. Data to the sex determination in Pistacia species using molecular markers. Euphytica, 185(2):227-231. Freeman D C, Harper K T, Ostler W K. 1980. Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and California. Oecologia, 44(3): 410-417. Guangxiu L, Wei Z, Tuo C, et al. 2009. Gender-specific carbon discrimination and stomatal density in the dioecious tree of Hippophate rhamnoides. South African Journal of Botany, 75(2): 268-275. Gunter L E, Roberts G T, Lee K, et al. 2003. The development of two flanking SCAR markers linked to a sex determination locus in Salix viminalis L. Journal of Heredity, 94(2):185-189. Isogimi T, Matsushita M, Watanabe Y, et al. 2011. Sexual differences in physiological integration in the dioecious shrub Lindera triloba: a field experiment using girdling manipulation. Annals of Botany, 107(6): 1029-1037. Jiang H, Peng S, Zhang S, et al. 2012. Transcriptional profiling analysis in Populus yunnanensis provides insights into molecular mechanisms of sexual differences in salinity tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(10): 3709-3726. Jing S W, Coley P D. 1990. Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defense in Acer negundo. Oikos, 58(3): 369-377. Laporte M M, Delph L F. 1996. Sex-specific physiology and source-sink relations in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Oecologia, 106(1): 63-72. Li C, Ren J, Luo J et al. 2004. Sex-specific physiological and growth responses to water stress in Hippophae rhamnoides L. populations. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 26(2): 123-129. Li C, Xu G, Zang R, et al. 2007. Sex-related differences in leaf morphological and physiological responses in Hippophae rhamnoides along an altitudinal gradient. Tree Physiology, 27(3): 399-406. Li C, Yang Y, Junttila O, et al. 2005. Sexual differences in cold acclimation and freezing tolerance development in sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) ecotypes. Plant Science, 168(5): 1365-1370. Li Y X, Wang X G, Yang C H, et al. 2013. Identification of a locus characteristic of male individuals of buffalo grass [Buchloe dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.] by using an RAPD marker. Genetics and Molecular Research: GMR, 12(3): 4070-2077. Marshall J D, Dawson T E, Ehleringer J R. 1993. Gender-related differences in gas exchange are not related to host quality in the xylem-tapping mistleoe, Phoradendron juniperinum (Viscaceae). American Journal of Botany, 80(6): 641-645. Montesinos D, Villar-Salvador P, García-Fayos P, et al. 2012. Genders in Juniperus thurifera have different functional responses to variations in nutrient availability. New Phytologist, 193(3): 705-712. Nybakken L, Hérkkä R, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2012. Combined enhancements of temperature and UVB influence growth and phenolics in clones of the sexually dimorphic Salix myrsinifolia. Physiologia Plantarum, 145(4): 551- 564. Nybakken L, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2013. Gender differences in Salix myrsinifolia at the pre-reproductive stage are little affected by simulated climatic change. Physiologia Plantarum, 147(4): 465-476. Obeso J R. 2002. The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist, 155(3): 321-348. Peng S, Jiang H, Zhang S, et al. 2012. Transcriptional profiling reveals sexual differences of the leaf transcriptomes in response to drought stress in Populus yunnanensis. Tree physiology, 32(12): 1541-1555. Renner S S, Ricklefs R E. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Amherican Journal of Botany, 82(5): 596-606. Retuerto R, Lema B F, Roiloa S R, et al. 2000. Gender, light and water effects in carbon isotope discrimination, and growth rates in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium. Functional Ecology, 14(5): 529-537. Ruuhola T, Nybakken L, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2013. Sex-related differences of two ecologically divergent Salix species in the responses of enzyme activities to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Biologia Plantarum, 57(4): 732-738. Semerikov V, Lagercrantz U, Tsarouhas V, et al. 2003. Genetic mapping of sex-linked markers in Salix viminalis L[J]. Heredity, 91(3): 293-299. Sinclair J P, Emlen J, Freeman D C. 2012. Biased sex ratios in plants: theory and trends. The Botanical Review, 78(1): 63-86. Tozawa M, Ueno N, Seiwa K. 2009. Compensatory mechanisms for reproductive costs in the dioecious tree Salix integra. Botany, 87(3): 315-323. Ueno N, Kanno H, Seiwa K. 2006. Sexual differences in shoot and leaf dynamics in the dioecious tree Salix sachalinensis. Canadian Journal of Botany, 84(12): 1852-1859. Ueno N, Seiwa K. 2003. Gender-specific shoot structure and functions in relation to habitat conditions in a dioecious tree, Salix sachalinensis. Journal of Forestry Research, 8(1): 9-16. Xing H C, She W, Luo Z Q, et al. 2009. Study on the relationship between sex differentiation and ethylene in ramie. Agricultural Sciences in China, 8(4): 418-423. Xu X, Peng G, Wu C, et al. 2008a. Drought inhibits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males of Populus cathayana. Tree Physiology, 28(11): 1751-1759. Xu X, Yang F A N, Xiao X, et al. 2008b. Sex-specific responses of Populus cathayana to drought and elevated temperatures. Plant, cell & environment, 31(6): 850-860. Zhang S, Chen F, Peng S, et al. 2010a. Comparative physiological, ultrastructural and proteomic analyses reveal sexual differences in the responses of Populus cathayana under drought stress. Proteomics, 10(14): 2661-2667. Zhang S, Chen L, Duan B, et al. 2012. Populus cathayana males exhibit more efficient protective mechanisms than females under drought stress. Forest Ecology and Management, 275: 68-78. Zhang S, Lu S, Xu X, et al. 2010b. Changes in antioxidant enzyme activities and isozyme profiles in leaves of male and female Populus cathayana infected with Melampsora larici-populina. Tree physiology, 30(1): 116-128. Zhang S, Jiang H, Peng S, et al. 2011. Sex-related differences in morphological, physiological, and ultrastructural responses of Populus cathayana to chilling. Journal of experimental botany, 62(2): 675-686. Zhao H, Li Y, Duan B, et al. 2009. Sex-related adaptive responses of Populus cathayana to photoperiod transitionspce. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32(10): 1401-1411. Zhao H, Xu X, Zhang Y, et al. 2011. Nitrogen deposition limits photosynthetic response to elevated CO2 differentially in a dioecious species. Oecologia, 165(1): 41-54. |