Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (12): 43-56.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20211205
Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhiyi Zhang,Lin Xin,Erfa Qiu*,Xiaoyang Xie,Xinyu Wang,Zhenkai Sun,Shasha Jiang,Jiao Zhao
Received:
2021-01-04
Online:
2021-12-25
Published:
2022-01-26
Contact:
Erfa Qiu
CLC Number:
Zhiyi Zhang,Lin Xin,Erfa Qiu,Xiaoyang Xie,Xinyu Wang,Zhenkai Sun,Shasha Jiang,Jiao Zhao. Scenic Beauty Estimation in Four Seasons of the Forest Belt along the Winter Olympics Expressway[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(12): 43-56.
Table 1
Features of plant community landscape elements"
编号 No. | 项目 Item | 类目Sub-item | |||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
X1 | 树种丰富度 Tree species richness | 1~2 | 3~4 | ≥5 | |
X2 | 林分密度 Stand density | 疏植 Thinning | 较密 Denser | 密植 Dense planting | |
X3 | 层次结构 Hierarchy | 单一乔木 Single tree | 乔草 Trees and herbs | 乔灌 Trees and shrubs | 乔灌草 Trees, shrubs, herbs |
X4 | 常绿树种比例 Proportion of evergreen tree species | 0 | (0, 1/3] | (1/3, 2/3] | (2/3, +∞) |
X5 | 乡土树种比例 Percentage of native tree species | < 60% | 60%~80% | ≥80% | |
X6 | 植物生长状况 Plant growth status | 群落内大部分树木枯死枝干多,个体整体形态不完整;或多数树木病虫害严重,生长势弱,观赏效果差 Most of the trees in the community have many dead branches, and the overall shape of the individual is incomplete; or most trees have serious diseases and insect pests, weak growth potential, and poor viewing effects | 群落内部分树木生长状况一般,树冠形态比较完整,有部分枯死枝干;叶色基本正常 The growth status of some trees in the community is normal, the crown morphology is relatively complete, with some dead branches and trunks; the leaf color is basically normal | 群落内树木个体形态完整,无枯死枝干;叶色正常,无病虫害,植株整体健康 The individual morphology of the trees in the community is complete, with no dead branches; the leaf color is normal, there is no pests and diseases, and the plants are overall healthy | |
X7 | 林木排列方式 Tree arrangement | 规则式 Regular | 自然式 Natural | 混合式 Mixed | |
X8 | 林缘线 Forest margin | 规则 Regular | 曲折 Tortuous | 自然,且不影响交通安全 Natural, and does not affect traffic safety | |
X9 | 林分整洁度 Stand cleanliness | 杂乱 Messy | 较整洁 Less tidy | 整洁 Tidy | |
X10 | 彩叶植物存在方式 Composition patterns of color-leaf plants | 无 No | 星散型 Scattered | 密集型 Dense | 综合型 Comprehensive |
X11 | 植物色泽 Plant color | 暗 Dark | 一般 General | 亮 Bright | |
X12 | 枝干色彩 Branch color | 四季枝干色彩仅有灰褐色或黑褐色1种,色彩暗淡 The branches and stems in four seasons are only gray-brown or dark-brown in color, and the color is dim | 春夏秋3季以灰褐色等暗淡的色彩为主色彩,但冬季枝条有黄色等较醒目的色彩 The three seasons of spring, summer and autumn are dominated by dark colors such as gray-brown, but in winter the branches have more eye-catching colors such as yellow | 枝干色彩醒目,四季以灰白色等醒目的色彩为主色彩 The color of the branches is eye-catching, and the main color is gray and white in four seasons | |
X13 | 树干显示度 Trunk visibility | 不可辨 Indistinguishable | 模糊 Blurry | 清晰 Clear | |
X14 | 树形丰富度 Tree shape richness | 1种 1 type | 2种 2 types | 3种及以上 3 types and above | |
X15 | 其他观赏类型 Other viewing types | 无 No | 观花或观果 View flowers or fruits |
Table 2
Scenic beauty estimation(SBE) calculation example"
等级 Grade | 景观Ⅰ Landscape Ⅰ | 景观Ⅱ Landscape Ⅱ | |||||||
f | cf | cp | z | f | cf | cp | z | ||
3 | 76 | 76 | 0.129 0 | -1.131 0 | 55 | 55 | 0.093 4 | -1.320 2 | |
2 | 81 | 157 | 0.266 6 | -0.623 3 | 94 | 149 | 0.253 0 | -0.665 2 | |
1 | 140 | 297 | 0.504 2 | 0.010 6 | 129 | 278 | 0.472 0 | -0.070 3 | |
0 | 140 | 437 | 0.741 9 | 0.649 3 | 163 | 441 | 0.748 7 | 0.670 5 | |
-1 | 75 | 512 | 0.869 3 | 1.122 9 | 80 | 521 | 0.884 6 | 1.198 0 | |
-2 | 44 | 556 | 0.944 0 | 1.589 0 | 44 | 565 | 0.959 3 | 1.742 1 | |
-3 | 33 | 589 | 1.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 24 | 589 | 1.000 0 | 0.000 0 | |
Z | 0.269 6 | 0.259 2 | |||||||
SBE | SBE1=0.269 6-0.259 2=0.010 4 | SBE2=0.259 2-0.259 2=0 |
Table 3
Analysis of variance of road forest landscape factors in spring"
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F | p |
树种丰富度Tree species richness(X1) | 0.025 2 | 2 | 0.012 6 | 4.881 1 | 0.023 3 |
层次结构Hierarchy(X3) | 0.063 6 | 3 | 0.021 2 | 8.205 5 | 0.001 8 |
植物生长状况Plant growth status(X6) | 0.025 0 | 2 | 0.012 5 | 4.839 3 | 0.023 9 |
林缘线Forest margin(X8) | 0.020 2 | 2 | 0.010 1 | 3.904 9 | 0.043 1 |
林分整洁度Stand cleanliness(X9) | 0.014 2 | 2 | 0.007 1 | 2.745 7 | 0.096 4 |
彩叶植物存在方式Composition patterns of color-leaf plants (X10) | 0.026 8 | 3 | 0.008 9 | 3.451 5 | 0.043 6 |
植物色泽Plant color(X11) | 0.048 0 | 2 | 0.024 0 | 9.283 0 | 0.002 4 |
枝干色彩Branch color(X12) | 0.011 1 | 2 | 0.005 5 | 2.142 3 | 0.151 9 |
误差Error | 0.038 8 | 15 | 0.002 6 | ||
总变异Total variation | 0.219 7 | 33 |
Table 4
Regression results of road forest landscape factors in spring"
项目 Item | 类目 Category | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | 标准误 Standard error | t检验值 t test value | p |
树种丰富度 Tree species richness(X1) | X1-1 | -0.061 1 | -0.363 5 | 0.066 9 | -0.914 1 | 0.375 1 |
X1-2 | -0.099 3 | -0.600 2 | 0.032 8 | -3.028 0 | 0.008 5 | |
X1-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
层次结构 Hierarchy(X3) | X3-1 | -0.157 2 | -0.745 5 | 0.072 5 | -2.169 1 | 0.046 6 |
X3-2 | 0.087 6 | 0.415 5 | 0.044 3 | 1.978 4 | 0.066 5 | |
X3-3 | -0.019 8 | -0.069 9 | 0.044 9 | -0.441 0 | 0.665 5 | |
X3-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
植物生长状况 Plant growth status(X6) | X6-1 | -0.115 8 | -0.510 3 | 0.064 7 | -1.791 4 | 0.093 4 |
X6-2 | -0.100 0 | -0.594 2 | 0.032 1 | -3.111 0 | 0.007 2 | |
X6-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林缘线 Forest margin(X8) | X8-1 | 0.107 9 | 0.511 6 | 0.044 6 | 2.418 3 | 0.028 8 |
X8-2 | 0.055 3 | 0.221 5 | 0.059 4 | 0.930 9 | 0.366 6 | |
X8-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林分整洁度 Stand cleanliness(X9) | X9-1 | -0.035 2 | 0.330 0 | 0.091 1 | 1.723 8 | 0.105 3 |
X9-2 | 0.157 0 | -0.199 3 | 0.024 0 | -1.467 3 | 0.163 0 | |
X9-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
彩叶植物存在方式 Composition patterns of color-leaf plants (X10) | X10-1 | -0.114 2 | -0.626 5 | 0.035 9 | -3.183 9 | 0.006 2 |
X10-2 | -0.056 5 | -0.329 1 | 0.028 2 | -2.006 5 | 0.063 2 | |
X10-3 | -0.066 7 | -0.316 4 | 0.041 7 | -1.599 9 | 0.130 5 | |
X10-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
植物色泽 Plant color(X11) | X11-1 | 0.004 2 | 0.008 9 | 0.087 4 | 0.048 2 | 0.962 2 |
X11-2 | 0.111 0 | 0.690 5 | 0.027 2 | 4.077 8 | 0.001 0 | |
X11-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
枝干色彩 Branch color(X12) | X12-1 | 0.053 9 | 0.330 3 | 0.043 7 | 1.234 7 | 0.235 9 |
X12-2 | 0.085 4 | 0.497 3 | 0.042 5 | 2.010 9 | 0.062 7 | |
X12-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — |
Table 5
Analysis of variance of road forest landscape factors in summer"
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F | p |
常绿树种比例Proportion of evergreen tree species(X4) | 0.022 9 | 3 | 0.007 6 | 5.804 4 | 0.005 9 |
乡土树种比例Percentage of native tree species(X5) | 0.002 8 | 2 | 0.001 4 | 1.047 5 | 0.371 2 |
林木排列方式Tree arrangement(X7) | 0.006 7 | 2 | 0.003 3 | 2.533 8 | 0.107 3 |
植物色泽Plant color(X11) | 0.022 4 | 2 | 0.011 2 | 8.488 5 | 0.002 5 |
枝干色彩Branch color(X12) | 0.003 1 | 2 | 0.001 5 | 1.165 4 | 0.334 3 |
树干显示度Trunk visibility(X13) | 0.006 5 | 2 | 0.003 3 | 2.467 0 | 0.113 0 |
树形丰富度Tree shape richness(X14) | 0.007 8 | 2 | 0.003 9 | 2.941 3 | 0.078 5 |
误差Error | 0.023 7 | 18 | 0.001 3 | ||
总变异Total variation | 0.097 5 | 33 |
Table 6
Regression results of road forest landscape factors in summer"
项目 Item | 类目 Category | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | 标准误 Standard error | t检验值 t test value | p |
常绿树种比例 Proportion of evergreen tree species(X4) | X4-1 | -0.076 7 | -0.653 0 | 0.026 5 | -2.895 9 | 0.009 6 |
X4-2 | -0.026 5 | -0.231 7 | 0.030 0 | -0.882 7 | 0.389 1 | |
X4-3 | -0.090 7 | -0.747 0 | 0.027 8 | -3.263 7 | 0.004 3 | |
X4-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
乡土树种比例 Percentage of native tree species(X5) | X5-1 | 0.028 5 | 0.249 2 | 0.021 7 | 1.313 8 | 0.205 4 |
X5-2 | 0.005 7 | 0.040 9 | 0.024 4 | 0.235 2 | 0.816 7 | |
X5-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林木排列方式 Tree arrangement(X7) | X7-1 | -0.054 2 | -0.429 4 | 0.025 5 | -2.123 5 | 0.047 8 |
X7-2 | -0.057 0 | -0.343 2 | 0.032 7 | -1.744 3 | 0.098 2 | |
X7-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
植物色泽 Plant color(X11) | X11-1 | 0.081 1 | 0.708 6 | 0.027 1 | 2.990 5 | 0.007 8 |
X11-2 | 0.100 2 | 0.934 4 | 0.024 7 | 4.056 0 | 0.000 7 | |
X11-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
枝干色彩 Branch color(X12) | X12-1 | 0.049 4 | 0.440 7 | 0.033 0 | 1.496 2 | 0.151 9 |
X12-2 | 0.048 7 | 0.401 0 | 0.033 7 | 1.445 4 | 0.165 5 | |
X12-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
树干显示度 Trunk visibility(X13) | X13-1 | 0.037 6 | 0.226 0 | 0.027 4 | 1.370 7 | 0.187 3 |
X13-2 | 0.029 8 | 0.266 0 | 0.016 7 | 1.781 2 | 0.091 8 | |
X13-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
树形丰富度 Tree shape richness(X14) | X14-1 | 0.026 6 | 0.237 2 | 0.025 7 | 1.032 1 | 0.315 7 |
X14-2 | -0.022 1 | -0.206 1 | 0.023 6 | -0.938 6 | 0.360 4 | |
X14-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — |
Table 7
Analysis of variance of road forest landscape factors in autumn"
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F | p |
层次结构Hierarchy(X3) | 0.045 1 | 3 | 0.015 0 | 3.391 4 | 0.042 2 |
乡土树种比例Percentage of native tree species(X5) | 0.047 9 | 2 | 0.024 0 | 5.403 7 | 0.015 3 |
植物生长状况Plant growth status(X6) | 0.012 3 | 2 | 0.006 2 | 1.391 0 | 0.275 7 |
林木排列方式Tree arrangement(X7) | 0.042 4 | 2 | 0.021 2 | 4.782 5 | 0.022 5 |
林缘线Forest margin(X8) | 0.014 3 | 2 | 0.007 2 | 1.612 8 | 0.228 4 |
彩叶植物存在方式Composition patterns of color-leaf plants (X10) | 0.064 1 | 3 | 0.021 4 | 4.816 3 | 0.013 2 |
枝干色彩Branch color(X12) | 0.036 2 | 2 | 0.018 1 | 4.079 5 | 0.035 7 |
误差Error | 0.075 4 | 17 | 0.004 4 | ||
总变异Total variation | 0.273 0 | 33 |
Table 8
Regression results of road forest landscape factors in autumn"
项目 Item | 类目 Category | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | 标准误 Standard error | t检验值 t test value | p |
层次结构 Hierarchy(X3) | X3-1 | -0.002 8 | -0.012 0 | 0.041 7 | -0.067 7 | 0.946 8 |
X3-2 | 0.126 0 | 0.536 1 | 0.042 1 | 2.990 0 | 0.008 2 | |
X3-3 | 0.060 5 | 0.191 4 | 0.048 4 | 1.248 5 | 0.228 8 | |
X3-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
乡土树种比例 Percentage of native tree species(X5) | X5-1 | 0.098 6 | 0.514 9 | 0.033 0 | 2.987 3 | 0.008 3 |
X5-2 | 0.006 9 | 0.029 5 | 0.041 5 | 0.167 1 | 0.869 3 | |
X5-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
植物生长状况 Plant growth status(X6) | X6-1 | -0.051 1 | 0.073 9 | 0.058 0 | 0.402 6 | 0.692 3 |
X6-2 | 0.023 4 | -0.242 1 | 0.044 1 | -1.159 1 | 0.262 4 | |
X6-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林木排列方式 Tree arrangement(X7) | X7-1 | -0.011 4 | -0.053 9 | 0.049 7 | -0.228 9 | 0.821 6 |
X7-2 | 0.139 5 | 0.501 6 | 0.060 4 | 2.309 9 | 0.033 7 | |
X7-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林缘线 Forest margin(X8) | X8-1 | 0.012 0 | 0.051 2 | 0.061 2 | 0.196 8 | 0.846 3 |
X8-2 | -0.078 7 | -0.283 0 | 0.071 4 | -1.102 1 | 0.285 8 | |
X8-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
彩叶植物存在方式 Composition patterns of color-leaf plants(X10) | X10-1 | -0.187 2 | -0.740 0 | 0.050 5 | -3.706 0 | 0.001 8 |
X10-2 | -0.076 1 | -0.397 3 | 0.045 7 | -1.666 4 | 0.114 0 | |
X10-3 | -0.093 4 | -0.506 7 | 0.042 9 | -2.175 5 | 0.044 0 | |
X10-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
枝干色彩 Branch color(X12) | X12-1 | -0.008 0 | -0.044 2 | 0.054 5 | -0.147 6 | 0.884 4 |
X12-2 | 0.090 6 | 0.473 3 | 0.060 0 | 1.511 9 | 0.148 9 | |
X12-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — |
Table 9
Analysis of variance of road forest landscape factors in winter"
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F | p |
树种丰富度Tree species richness(X1) | 0.007 0 | 2 | 0.003 5 | 1.709 7 | 0.214 3 |
林分密度Stand density(X2) | 0.007 4 | 2 | 0.003 7 | 1.824 3 | 0.195 4 |
层次结构Hierarchy(X3) | 0.034 1 | 3 | 0.011 4 | 5.561 7 | 0.009 1 |
常绿树种比例Proportion of evergreen tree species(X4) | 0.018 6 | 3 | 0.006 2 | 3.030 7 | 0.062 1 |
林木排列方式Tree arrangement(X7) | 0.012 1 | 2 | 0.006 1 | 2.972 3 | 0.081 8 |
彩叶植物存在方式Composition patterns of color-leaf plants (X10) | 0.015 1 | 2 | 0.007 5 | 3.693 6 | 0.049 6 |
植物色泽Plant color(X11) | 0.022 5 | 2 | 0.011 2 | 5.504 1 | 0.016 1 |
树形丰富度Tree shape richness(X14) | 0.005 9 | 2 | 0.002 9 | 1.442 5 | 0.267 3 |
误差Error | 0.030 6 | 15 | 0.002 0 | ||
总变异Total variation | 0.139 5 | 33 |
Table 10
Regression results of road forest landscape factors in winter"
项目 Item | 类目 Category | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | 标准误 Standard error | t检验值 t test value | p |
树种丰富度 Tree species richness(X1) | X1-1 | -0.009 0 | -0.067 1 | 0.041 1 | -0.218 9 | 0.829 7 |
X1-2 | 0.032 5 | 0.246 6 | 0.029 4 | 1.106 1 | 0.286 1 | |
X1-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林分密度 Stand density(X2) | X2-1 | 0.047 8 | 0.356 7 | 0.036 4 | 1.311 8 | 0.209 3 |
X2-2 | 0.003 0 | 0.022 7 | 0.028 8 | 0.102 6 | 0.919 7 | |
X2-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
层次结构 Hierarchy(X3) | X3-1 | 0.084 5 | 0.503 2 | 0.041 9 | 2.019 8 | 0.061 6 |
X3-2 | 0.120 3 | 0.716 3 | 0.036 8 | 3.265 9 | 0.005 2 | |
X3-3 | -0.032 1 | -0.142 3 | 0.038 8 | -0.828 5 | 0.420 4 | |
X3-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
常绿树种比例 Proportion of evergreen tree species(X4) | X4-1 | 0.033 0 | 0.234 7 | 0.046 8 | 0.704 5 | 0.491 9 |
X4-2 | 0.081 8 | 0.597 8 | 0.048 0 | 1.705 2 | 0.108 8 | |
X4-3 | -0.006 5 | -0.044 9 | 0.043 5 | -0.149 9 | 0.882 8 | |
X4-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
林木排列方式 Tree arrangement(X7) | X7-1 | 0.071 3 | 0.472 3 | 0.034 1 | 2.091 3 | 0.053 9 |
X7-2 | 0.098 8 | 0.496 9 | 0.043 4 | 2.274 3 | 0.038 1 | |
X7-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
彩叶植物存在方式 Composition patterns of color-leaf plants(X10) | X10-1 | 0.159 0 | 0.800 0 | 0.058 6 | 2.715 2 | 0.016 0 |
X10-2 | 0.161 1 | 0.713 5 | 0.072 6 | 2.219 3 | 0.042 3 | |
X10-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
植物色泽 Plant color(X11) | X11-1 | -0.076 2 | -0.595 2 | 0.068 8 | -1.108 0 | 0.285 3 |
X11-2 | -0.010 1 | -0.078 8 | 0.070 5 | -0.143 5 | 0.887 8 | |
X11-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
树形丰富度 Tree shape richness(X14) | X14-1 | -0.069 3 | -0.477 3 | 0.042 3 | -1.638 3 | 0.122 2 |
X14-2 | -0.046 4 | -0.361 7 | 0.030 9 | -1.502 8 | 0.153 7 | |
X14-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — |
Table 11
Analysis of variance of road forest landscape factors in four seasons"
变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 Sum of squares | 自由度 df | 均方 Mean square | F | p |
林分密度Stand density(X2) | 0.208 5 | 2 | 0.104 2 | 4.560 8 | 0.012 3 |
层次结构Hierarchy(X3) | 0.098 8 | 3 | 0.032 9 | 1.440 8 | 0.234 2 |
彩叶植物存在方式Composition patterns of color-leaf plants(X10) | 0.298 1 | 3 | 0.099 4 | 4.347 6 | 0.006 0 |
植物色泽Plant color(X11) | 0.280 1 | 2 | 0.140 1 | 6.127 8 | 0.002 9 |
树干显示度Trunk visibility(X13) | 0.375 2 | 2 | 0.187 6 | 8.207 6 | 0.000 5 |
误差Error | 2.811 3 | 123 | 0.022 9 | ||
总变异Total variation | 4.279 0 | 135 |
Table 12
Regression results of road forest landscape factors in four seasons"
项目 Item | 类目 Category | 系数 Coefficient | 标准系数 Standard coefficient | 标准误 Standard error | t检验值 t test value | p |
林分密度 Stand density(X2) | X2-1 | 0.123 8 | 0.333 6 | 0.043 0 | 2.878 1 | 0.004 7 |
X2-2 | 0.035 4 | 0.098 3 | 0.036 9 | 0.959 5 | 0.339 2 | |
X2-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
层次结构 Hierarchy(X3) | X3-1 | 0.003 6 | 0.007 8 | 0.040 7 | 0.088 7 | 0.929 4 |
X3-2 | 0.064 8 | 0.147 8 | 0.037 3 | 1.736 2 | 0.085 0 | |
X3-3 | -0.035 4 | -0.056 7 | 0.053 8 | -0.658 2 | 0.511 6 | |
X3-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
彩叶植物存在方式 Composition patterns of color-leaf plants(X10) | X10-1 | -0.160 1 | -0.451 2 | 0.046 7 | -3.431 9 | 0.000 8 |
X10-2 | -0.085 5 | -0.202 3 | 0.049 5 | -1.729 3 | 0.086 3 | |
X10-3 | -0.110 8 | -0.238 2 | 0.053 5 | -2.072 3 | 0.040 3 | |
X10-4 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
植物色泽 Plant color(X11) | X11-1 | -0.131 8 | -0.321 7 | 0.042 2 | -3.125 7 | 0.002 2 |
X11-2 | -0.027 7 | -0.077 8 | 0.034 4 | -0.803 9 | 0.423 0 | |
X11-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — | |
树干显示度 Trunk visibility(X13) | X13-1 | 0.104 1 | 0.207 9 | 0.045 3 | 2.297 6 | 0.023 3 |
X13-2 | 0.137 7 | 0.325 6 | 0.036 1 | 3.817 3 | 0.000 2 | |
X13-3 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | — | — |
Table 13
Contribution rate of different landscape factors to each season"
景观因子 Landscape factor | 贡献率Contribution rate(%) | |||
春季 Spring | 夏季 Summer | 秋季 Autumn | 冬季 Winter | |
层次结构Hierarchy | 8.57 | — | 15.53 | 20.72 |
彩叶植物存在方式Composition patterns of color-leaf plants | 10.67 | — | 22.57 | 21.91 |
植物色泽Plant color | 10.37 | 24.31 | — | 10.36 |
枝干色彩Branch color | 7.98 | 11.99 | 11.89 | — |
林木排列方式Tree arrangement | — | 13.83 | 18.20 | 13.43 |
树种丰富度Tree species richness | 9.28 | — | — | 5.64 |
乡土树种比例Percentage of native tree species | — | 6.92 | 11.89 | — |
植物生长状况Plant growth | 15.75 | — | 15.75 | — |
林缘线Forest margin | 10.08 | — | 10.94 | — |
常绿树种比例Proportion of evergreen species | — | 22.01 | — | 12.01 |
树形丰富度Tree shape richness | — | 11.82 | — | 9.42 |
林分整洁度Stand cleanliness | 10.77 | — | — | — |
树干显示度Trunk visibility | — | 9.12 | — | — |
林分密度Stand density | — | — | — | 6.50 |
陈鑫峰, 贾黎明. 京西山区森林林内景观评价研究. 林业科学, 2003, 39 (4): 59- 66. | |
Chen X F , Jia L M . Evaluation of forest landscape in western Beijing. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 39 (4): 59- 66. | |
陈有民. 园林树木学. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992. | |
Chen Y M . Landscape dendrology. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1992. | |
陈勇, 孙冰, 廖绍波, 等. 深圳市城市森林林内景观的美景度评价. 林业科学, 2014, 50 (8): 39- 44. | |
Chen Y , Sun B , Liao S B , et al. Beauty evaluation of urban forest landscape in Shenzhen. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50 (8): 39- 44. | |
龚岚. 2015. 北京城区典型城市森林结构特点分析. 北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文. | |
Gong L. 2015. Analysis of forest structure characteristics of typical urban areas in Beijing. Beijing: PhD thesis of Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
冯慧灵, 刘柄麟, 张超, 等. 城市公园植物景观美学评价. 上海师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 47 (4): 507- 512. | |
Feng H L , Liu B L , Zhang C , et al. Aesthetic evaluation of plant landscape in urban parks. Journal of Shanghai Normal University: Natural Science Edition, 47 (4): 507- 512. | |
何韵仪. 2017. 高速公路生态景观林带设计与评价分析. 广东: 华南理工大学硕士学位论文. | |
He Y Y. 2017. Design and evaluation analysis of ecological landscape forest belt of expressway. Guangdong: MS thesis of South China University of Technology. [in Chinese] | |
胡马. 2018. 合肥环城公园植物群落冬季美景度研究. 合肥: 安徽农业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Hu M. 2018. Study on winter beauty of plant community in Hefei Ring Park. Hefei: MS thesis of Anhui Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
黄帅帅, 曹哲源, 邱尔发, 等. 北京市居住区林木健康评价. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (24): 9222- 9232. | |
Huang S S , Cao Z Y , Qiu E F , et al. Forest health assessment in residential areas of Beijing. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 2019, 39 (24): 9222- 9232. | |
李成, 李会云, 孔德义, 等. 园林景观美景度评价研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47 (11): 10- 12, 17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2019.11.004 |
|
Li C , Li H Y , Kong D Y , et al. Progress in landscape beauty evaluation. Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47 (11): 10- 12, 17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2019.11.004 |
|
李汝佳. 2017. 基于公众认知的徐州市园林树木个体美学特征研究. 徐州: 中国矿业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Li R J. 2017. Research on individual aesthetic characteristics of landscape trees in Xuzhou based on public cognition. Xuzhou: MS thesis of China University of Mining and Technology. [in Chinese] | |
刘亚. 2016. 北京市滨水林林外景观质量评价研究. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Liu Y. 2016. Study on landscape quality evaluation of waterfront forest in Beijing. Beijing: MS thesis of Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
刘洋, 高宇, 张睿. 基于AHP模型的冬季校园植物景观评价——以东北林业大学为例. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45 (4): 171- 173.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2017.04.054 |
|
Liu Y , Gao Y , Zhang R . Evaluation of winter campus plant landscape based on AHP model: a case study of Northeast Forestry University. Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45 (4): 171- 173.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2017.04.054 |
|
毛炯玮, 朱飞捷, 车生泉. 城市自然遗留地景观美学评价的方法研究——心理物理学方法的理论与应用. 中国园林, 2010, 26 (3): 51- 54.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2010.03.014 |
|
Mao J W , Zhu F J , Che S Q . Landscape aesthetic evaluation of urban natural heritage: Theory and application of psychophysical method. Chinese Garden, 2010, 26 (3): 51- 54.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2010.03.014 |
|
全文燕. 2012. 城市高架轨道交通线性景观研究. 南京: 南京林业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Quan W Y. 2012. Study on linear landscape of urban elevated rail transit. Nanjing: MS thesis of Nanjing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
孙姝亭. 2016. 北京市居民小区景观林景观质量评价研究. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Sun S T. 2016. Study on landscape quality evaluation of residential landscape forest in Beijing. Beijing: MS thesis of Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006. | |
Tang Q Y , Feng M G . DPS data processing system. Beijing: Science Press, 2006. | |
王美婷, 孙冰, 陈雷, 等. 广州市典型性城市公园植物景观美景度研究. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34 (3): 501- 510. | |
Wang M T , Sun B , Chen L , et al. Study on plant landscape beauty of typical urban parks in Guangzhou. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2017, 34 (3): 501- 510. | |
谢珊珊, 王冬梦, 李雪, 等. 郑州紫荆山公园植物群落美景度评价. 西部林业科学, 2016, 45 (2): 146- 152. | |
Xie S S , Wang D M , Li X , et al. Evaluation of plant community beauty in Zijingshan Park, Zhengzhou. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2016, 45 (2): 146- 152. | |
邢瑞丽. 2014. 基于美景度评价的济南市快速路绿地植物配置研究. 济南: 山东建筑大学硕士学位论文. | |
Xing R L. 2014. Study on plant configuration of Expressway Green Space in Jinan based on scenic evaluation. Jinan: MS thesis of Shandong Jianzhu University. [in Chinese] | |
杨宝仪. 2016. 色彩分析在园林植物搭配上的应用初步研究. 广州: 华南农业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Yang B Y. 2016. Preliminary study on the application of color analysis in landscape plant collocation. Guangzhou: MS thesis of South China Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
张吉祥. 园林植物种植设计. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2001. | |
Zhang J X . Planting design of garden plants. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2001. | |
张凯旋, 凌焕然, 达良俊. 上海环城林带景观美学评价及优化策略. 生态学报, 2012, 32 (17): 5521- 5531. | |
Zhang K X , Ling H R , Da L J . Landscape aesthetic evaluation and optimization strategy of forest belt around Shanghai. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32 (17): 5521- 5531. | |
张丽玮. 2013. 冀北山地主要景观生态林结构与景观质量评价研究. 保定: 河北农业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Zhang L W. 2013. Study on structure and landscape quality evaluation of main landscape ecological forest in northern Hebei mountainous area. Baoding: MS thesis of Hebei Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
张元康. 2019. 贵阳市常用园林植物色彩量化研究. 贵阳: 贵州大学硕士学位论文. | |
Zhang Y K. 2019. Quantitative study on color of common garden plants in Guiyang. Guiyang: MS thesis of Guizhou University. [in Chinese] | |
张喆. 2017. 基于公众响应评价的森林色彩特征及其影响研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院博士学位论文. | |
Zhang Z. 2017. Research on forest color characteristics and impact based on public response evaluation. Beijing: PhD thesis of Chinese Academy of Forestry. [in Chinese] | |
章志都. 2010. 京郊低山风景游憩林质量评价及调控关键技术研究. 北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文. | |
Zhang Z D. 2010. Study on key technologies of quality evaluation and regulation of low mountain scenic recreational forest in the suburbs of Beijing. Beijing: PhD thesis of Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
章志都, 徐程扬, 龚岚, 等. 基于SBE法的北京市郊野公园绿地结构质量评价技术. 林业科学, 2011, 47 (8): 53- 60. | |
Zhang Z D , Xu C Y , Gong L , et al. Assessment on structural quality of landscapes in green space of Beijing suburban parks by SBE method. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47 (8): 53- 60. | |
赵芒. 2012. 北京公园冬季植物景观调查与营建初探. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院硕士学位论文. | |
Zhao M. 2012. Investigation and construction of winter plant landscape in Beijing park. Beijing: MS thesis of Chinese Academy of Forestry. [in Chinese] | |
赵佩. 2013. 山东省森林公园风景林景观质量评价. 泰安: 山东农业大学硕士学位论文. | |
Zhao P. 2013. Landscape quality evaluation of scenic forest in forest parks of Shandong Province. Tai'an: MS thesis of Shandong Agricultural University. [in Chinese] | |
周军军. 2013. 珠三角城市道路植物配置模式调查研究. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院硕士学位论文. | |
Zhou J J. 2013. Investigation and study on plant configuration mode of urban road in Pearl River Delta. Guangzhou: MS thesis of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering. [in Chinese] | |
Clay G R , Smidt R K . Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2004, 66, 239- 255.
doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00114-2 |
|
Creswell J W . Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education Inc, 2002, | |
Cronbach L J . Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951, 16 (3): 297- 334.
doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 |
|
Daniel T C , Boster R S . Measuring landscape esthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Range and Experiment Station, 1976, |
[1] | Xiaoting Li,Tong Li,Kuanbiao Qiu,Shasha Jiang,Baoquan Jia. Relationship between Patterns of Urban Forest Patches and Their Cooling Effects——A Case Study of Beijing Urban Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 32-42. |
[2] | Shaofeng Niu,Erfa Qiu,Zhiyi Zhang,Lu Xi. Changes of Diversity Gradient of Woody Plants Populations in Urban Riparian Forests of Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 198-206. |
[3] | Majie, Jia Baoquan. Diversity and Structural Characteristics of Woody Plants in the Greenbelt Attached to Urban Roads in the Sixth Ring Road of Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 13-21. |
[4] | Jia Baoquan, Qiu Kuanbiao. Urban Tree Canopy(UTC)Dynamics and Changes of Landscape Patterns in the Second Green Belt in Beijing from 2002 to 2013 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(2): 13-21. |
[5] | Xiuping Liu,Baoquan Jia. Characterization of Tree Canopy in Urban Residential Areas of Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(12): 12-20. |
[6] | Liu Ziqiang, Yu Xinxiao, Jia Guodong, Li Hanzhi, Lu Weiwei, Hou Guirong. Response to Precipitation in Water Sources for Platycladus orientalis in Beijing Mountain Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(7): 16-23. |
[7] | Jia Baoquan, Liu Xiuping. Urban Tree Canopy Changes Explained by Landscape Ecological Perspective:a Case Study of First Green Belt in Beijing, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(9): 1-10. |
[8] | Zhu Zhenya, Chen Lihua, Jiang Dewen, Yu Xinxiao. The Evolutionary Character and the Coupling Relationship of the Gravity Center of Ecological Services Value and Socio-Economic Factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(6): 118-126. |
[9] | Weng Shufei, Zhu Jinxin, Su Zhiyao, Yuan Zhe, Gao Chunli. Landscape Quality Assessment of Waterfront Plants in Green Areas of Lingnan Region [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(1): 20-27. |
[10] | Sun Fengshuo, Liu Yao, Qi Lei, Cao Han, Sui Jinling. Characteristics of Bird Community in Beijing Urban Greenland in Winter [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 134-141. |
[11] | Wang Jinlong, Yang Ling, Zhang Dahong, Shao Quanxi. Research on Benefit Cube Evaluation Model of Cooperative Afforestation Engineering between Beijing and Hebei Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(10): 125-133. |
[12] | Qin Zhong, Li Zhandong, Cheng Fangyun, Sha Haifeng. Cooling and Humidifying Effects of Five Landscape Plant Communities on Summer Days in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(1): 37-47. |
[13] | Chen Yong, Sun Bing, Liao Shaobo, Luo Shuixing, Chen Lei, Cai Gang. Scenic Beauty Estimation of In-Forest Landscapes in Shenzhen Urban Forests [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(8): 39-44. |
[14] | Wang Ping;Xing Changshan;Jia Liming;Wen Jing;Yun Xiaoqin. Effect of Different Tending Regimes on Scenic Quality of the Platycladus orientalis Recreational Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(3): 85-92. |
[15] | Cui Lijuan;Li Wei;Zhao Xinsheng;Zhang Yan;Zhang Manyin;Wang Yifei;Gao Changjun;Ma Qiongfang. Relationships between Submerged Plants Community Composition and Hydro-Environmental Factors in Xizhuojiaying Wetland, Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(6): 18-23. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||