Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 12-22.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20210902
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ming Liu1,2,Pietzarka Ulrich2,Roloff Andreas2,Deshun Zhang3,*
Received:
2021-12-03
Online:
2023-11-25
Published:
2023-12-08
Contact:
Deshun Zhang
CLC Number:
Ming Liu,Pietzarka Ulrich,Roloff Andreas,Deshun Zhang. Assessment on the Growth Sensitivity to Drought Stress for Various Tree Species Growing at Diverse Habitats ——A Case Study in Saxony, Germany[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(11): 12-22.
Table 1
Information of 24 surveyed combinations of tree species and habitats"
编号 | 树种 | 生境 | 树高 | 胸径 | 树龄 | 年均枝长 Annual shoot length/cm |
No. | Tree species | Habitats | Tree height/m | DBH/cm | Tree age/a | |
1 | 欧洲水青冈 Fagus sylvatica | 郁闭林 Closed forest | 1.7±0.1 | 3.0±0.5 | 5~8 | 31.1±9.0 |
2 | 夏栎 Quercus robur | 郁闭林 Closed forest | 1.8±0.1 | 4.5±0.7 | 5~8 | 26.6±10.7 |
3 | 栓皮槭 Acer campestre | 开敞林 Open forest | 3.5±0.6 | 5.9±1.6 | 5~8 | 50.9±19.9 |
4 | 梣叶槭 Acer negundo | 开敞林 Open forest | 3.8±0.8 | 5.6±1.7 | 5~8 | 59.0±23.8 |
5 | 挪威槭 Acer platanoides | 开敞林 Open forest | 6.2±1.0 | 6.4±1.1 | 9~15 | 56.9±23.6 |
6 | 桦叶鹅耳枥 Carpinus betulus | 开敞林 Open forest | 3.6±0.9 | 6.4±1.4 | 5~8 | 48.8±19.4 |
7 | 欧梣 Fraxinus excelsior | 开敞林 Open forest | 4.1±0.8 | 3.9±1.0 | 5~8 | 51.9±23.5 |
8 | 欧洲甜樱桃 Prunus avium | 开敞林 Open forest | 3.2±0.8 | 8.7±2.9 | 5~8 | 52.4±17.8 |
9 | 无梗花栎 Quercus petraea | 开敞林 Open forest | 5.9±1.1 | 9.3±2.5 | 9~15 | 19.6±10.6 |
10 | 夏栎 Quercus robur | 开敞林 Open forest | 3.1±0.9 | 4.7±1.6 | 5~8 | 39.2±16.0 |
11 | 刺槐 Robinia pseudoacacia | 开敞林 Open forest | 6.6±1.0 | 8.0±1.1 | 9~15 | 54.7±16.9 |
12 | 北欧花楸 Sorbus aucuparia | 开敞林 Open forest | 3.1±0.6 | 4.3±0.9 | 5~8 | 45.6±20.4 |
13 | 挪威槭 Acer platanoides | 行道树 Avenue tree | 9.7±2.0 | 24.8±3.8 | 9~15 | 29.4±18.4 |
14 | 梣叶槭 Acer negundo | 行道树 Avenue tree | 11.8±2.5 | 27.3±7.4 | 16~30 | 19.9±16.0 |
15 | 银白槭 Acer saccharinum | 行道树 Avenue tree | 14.1±2.4 | 27.2±3.8 | 16~30 | 6.2±4.4 |
16 | 欧洲七叶树 Aesculus hippocastanum | 行道树 Avenue tree | 7.6±1.0 | 19.6±3.5 | 9~15 | 10.6±7.5 |
17 | 臭椿 Ailanthus altissima | 行道树 Avenue tree | 9.2±1.7 | 32.9±6.6 | 16~30 | 9.0±6.6 |
18 | 欧梣 Fraxinus excelsior | 行道树 Avenue tree | 11.3±2.5 | 29.4±6.6 | 16~30 | 12.2±9.9 |
19 | 欧洲甜樱桃 Prunus avium | 行道树 Avenue tree | 5.7±1.2 | 14.9±7.2 | 16~30 | 14.9±11.4 |
20 | 西洋梨 Pyrus communis | 行道树 Avenue tree | 7.0±1.2 | 32.6±5.8 | 9~15 | 14.4±15.5 |
21 | 夏栎 Quercus robur | 行道树 Avenue tree | 8.2±1.5 | 17.6±4.4 | 9~15 | 21.7±11.2 |
22 | 北欧花楸 Sorbus aucuparia | 行道树 Avenue tree | 5.0±1.0 | 9.6±3.7 | 9~15 | 16.3±14.7 |
23 | 欧洲椴 Tilia europaea | 行道树 Avenue tree | 7.6±0.9 | 16.8±3.9 | 9~15 | 44.5±11.6 |
24 | 心叶椴 Tilia cordata | 行道树 Avenue tree | 6.6±1.5 | 26.5±5.2 | 16~30 | 15.4±8.1 |
Table 2
Tree species’ drought tolerance classification and their mean values and minima of leaf turgor loss point"
序号 No. | 树种 Species | 叶片膨压损失点水势 Ψtlp (Mean±SD)/(–MPa) | 叶片膨压损失点水势 Ψtlp (Minimum)/ (–MPa) | 抗旱性 Drought tolerance |
1 | 栓皮槭 Acer campestre | 2.32±0.55 | 3.01 | 较高抗旱性 High |
2 | 梣叶槭 Acer negundo | 2.22±0.52 | 2.56 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
3 | 挪威槭 Acer platanoides | 2.16±0.53 | 3.09 | 较高抗旱性 Moderate-High |
4 | 银白槭 Acer saccharinum | 3.30±0.03 | 3.3 | 高抗旱性 High |
5 | 欧洲七叶树 Aesculus hippocastanum | 1.81±0.16 | 1.92 | 弱抗旱性 Low |
6 | 臭椿 Ailanthus altissima | 1.95±0.36 | 2.41 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
7 | 桦叶鹅耳枥 Carpinus betulus | 2.65±0.05 | 2.71 | 较高抗旱性 Moderate-High |
8 | 欧洲水青冈 Fagus sylvatica | 2.29±0.42 | 2.57 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
9 | 欧梣 Fraxinus excelsior | 2.71±0.18 | 2.87 | 较高抗旱性 Moderate-High |
10 | 欧洲甜樱桃 Prunus avium | 2.32±0.06 | 2.37 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
11 | 西洋梨 Pyrus communis | 3.28±0.05 | 3.28 | 高抗旱性 High |
12 | 无梗花栎 Quercus petraea | 2.49±0.38 | 3.1 | 较高抗旱性 Moderate-High |
13 | 夏栎 Quercus robur | 2.73±0.12 | 2.87 | 较高抗旱性 Moderate-High |
14 | 刺槐 Robinia pseudoacacia | 2.01±0.27 | 2.49 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
15 | 北欧花楸 Sorbus aucuparia | 2.52±0.27 | 2.52 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
16 | 欧洲椴 Tilia europaea | 2.51±0.05 | 2.48 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
17 | 心叶椴 Tilia cordata | 2.32±0.11 | 2.51 | 中等抗旱性 Moderate |
Table 3
Pearson correlation analysis of factors"
因子 Factor | RAI | 生长敏感性 Growth sensitivity | 抗旱性 Drought tolerance | 生境 Habitat | 树龄 Age |
生长敏感性Growth sensitivity | ?0.853** | ||||
抗旱性 Drought tolerance | 0.010 | ?0.110 | |||
生境 Habitat | 0.388 | ?0.329 | 0.038 | ||
树龄 Age | ?0.279 | 0.228 | ?0.028 | ?0.771** | |
木质部结构 Xylem structure | 0.553** | ?0.545** | 0.042 | 0.277 | ?0.083 |
Table 4
Partial correlation analysis of factors"
因子间偏相关关系 Partial correlation between factors | 控制因子(偏相关系数) Control factor (Partial correlation coefficient) | |||
生长敏感性与RAI Growth sensitivity and RAI | 抗旱性 Drought tolerance | 生境 Habitat | 树龄 Age | 木质部结构 Xylem structure |
?0.857** | ?0.833** | ?0.844** | ?0.789** | |
木质部结构与RAI Xylem structure and RAI | 生长敏感性 Growth sensitivity | 抗旱性 Drought tolerance | 生境 Habitat | 树龄 Age |
0.202 | 0.553** | 0.503** | 0.554** | |
木质部结构与生长敏感性 Xylem structure and growth sensitivity | RAI | 抗旱性 Drought tolerance | 生境 Habitat | 树龄 Age |
?0.169 | ?0.544** | ?0.500** | ?0.542** | |
树龄与生境 Age and habitat | RAI | 生长敏感性 Growth sensitivity | 抗旱性 Drought tolerance | 木质部结构 Xylem structure |
?0.749** | ?0.757** | ?0.771** | ?0.781** |
董 鹏, 李 铭, 马 新, 等. 干旱胁迫对5个园林绿化树种生理生化特性的影响. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31 (4): 699- 704.
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.4.010 |
|
Dong P, Li M, Ma X, et al. Effect of drought stress on physiological characteristics of five garden trees. Southeast China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31 (4): 699- 704.
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.4.010 |
|
李泽东, 陈志成, 曹 振, 等. 2021. 华北低山丘陵区常用树种木质部解剖特征及水其力学抗旱性. 生态学报, 41(1): 69–78. | |
Li Z D, Chen Z C, Cao Z, et al. 2021. Xylem anatomical and hydraulic drought resistance characteristics of common tree species in hilly areas of North China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(1): 69−78.[in Chinese] | |
罗丹丹, 王传宽, 金 鹰. 植物水分调节对策: 等水与非等水行为. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41 (9): 1020- 1032.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0366 |
|
Luo D D, Wang C K, Jin Y. Plant water-regulation strategies: isohydric versus anisohydric behavior. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41 (9): 1020- 1032.
doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0366 |
|
马 斌, 张 娅, 吴 毅, 等. 干旱胁迫对4种木兰科树种生理特性的影响. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40 (11): 93- 99.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.11.012 |
|
Ma B, Zhang Y, Wu Y, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics of four Magnoliaceae species. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020, 40 (11): 93- 99.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.11.012 |
|
王 斌, 杨秀珍, 戴思兰. 4种园林树木抗旱性的综合分析. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35 (1): 95- 102.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2013.01.023 |
|
Wang B, Yang X Z, Dai S L. Comprehensive analysis in drought resistance of fourlandscape trees. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35 (1): 95- 102.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2013.01.023 |
|
Banks J M., Hirons A D. Alternative methods of estimating the water potential at turgor loss point in Acer genotypes. Plant Methods, 2019, 15 (1): 10- 15.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0394-z |
|
Bartlett M K, Scoffoni C, Ardy R, et al. Rapid determination of comparative drought tolerance traits: using an osmometer to predict turgor loss point. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2012a, 3 (5): 880- 888.
doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00230.x |
|
Bartlett M K, Scoffoni C, Sack L. The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecology Letters, 2012b, 15 (5): 393- 405.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x |
|
Bartlett M K, Zhang Y, Kreidler N, et al. Global analysis of plasticity in turgor loss point, a key drought tolerance trait. Ecology Letters, 2014, 17 (12): 1580- 1590.
doi: 10.1111/ele.12374 |
|
Blackman C J. Leaf turgor loss as a predictor of plant drought response strategies. Tree Physiology, 2018, 38 (5): 655- 657.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy047 |
|
Blackman C J, Creek D, Maier C, et al. Drought response strategies and hydraulic traits contribute to mechanistic understanding of plant dry-down to hydraulic failure. Tree Physiology, 2019, 39 (6): 910- 924.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz016 |
|
Bose A K, Scherrer D, Camarero J J, et al. Climate sensitivity and drought seasonality determine post-drought growth recovery of Quercus petraea and Quercus robur in Europe . Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 784, 147222.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147222 |
|
Brzostek E R, Dragoni D, Schmid H P, et al. Chronic water stress reduces tree growth and the carbon sink of deciduous hardwood forests. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20 (8): 2531- 2539.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12528 |
|
Callow D, May P, Johnstone D. Tree vitality assessment in urban landscapes. Forests, 2018, 9 (5): 1- 7. | |
Caloiero T, Veltri S. Drought assessment in the Sardinia region (Italy) during 1922–2011 using the standardized precipitation index. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2019, 176 (2): 925- 935.
doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-2008-5 |
|
Castagneri D, Vacchiano G, Hacket-Pain A, et al. Meta-analysis reveals different competition effects on tree growth resistance and resilience to drought. Ecosystems, 2021, 25 (1): 30- 43. | |
Cochard H, Bréda N, Granier A, et al. Vulnerability to air embolism of three European oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl, Q. pubescens Willd, Q robur L) . Annales Des Sciences Forestières, 1992, 49 (3): 225- 233. | |
Cochard H, Coste S, Chanson B, et al. Hydraulic architecture correlates with bud organogenesis and primary shoot growth in beech (Fagus sylvatica) . Tree Physiology, 2005, 25 (12): 1545- 1552.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.12.1545 |
|
Coomes D A, Allen R B. Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95 (5): 1084- 1097.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01280.x |
|
Dobbertin M. Tree growth as indicator of tree vitality and of tree reaction to environmental stress: a review. European Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 124 (4): 319- 333.
doi: 10.1007/s10342-005-0085-3 |
|
Eilmann B, Rigling A. Tree-growth analyses to estimate tree species’ drought tolerance. Tree Physiology, 2012, 32 (2): 178- 187.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps004 |
|
Elliott K J, Miniat C F, Pederson N, et al. Forest tree growth response to hydroclimate variability in the southern Appalachians. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21 (12): 4627- 4641.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.13045 |
|
Farrell C, Szota C, Arndt S K. Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants?. Plant Cell & Environment, 2017, 40 (8): 1500- 1511.
doi: 10.1111/pce.12948 |
|
Fuchs S, Leuschner C, Mathias L R, et al. Hydraulic variability of three temperate broadleaf tree species along a water availability gradient in central Europe. New Phytologist, 2021, 231 (4): 1387- 1400.
doi: 10.1111/nph.17448 |
|
Gillner S, Bräuning A, Roloff A. Dendrochronological analysis of urban trees: climatic response and impact of drought on frequently used tree species. Trees—Structure and Function, 2014, 28 (4): 1079- 1093.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-014-1019-9 |
|
Gillner S, Korn S, Hofmann M, et al. Contrasting strategies for tree species to cope with heat and dry conditions at urban sites. Urban Ecosystems, 2017, 20 (4): 853- 865.
doi: 10.1007/s11252-016-0636-z |
|
Gillner S, Rüger N, Roloff A, et al. Low relative growth rates predict future mortality of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L. ) . Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 302, 372- 378.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.032 |
|
Gillner S, Vogt J, Roloff A. Climatic response and impacts of drought on oaks at urban and forest sites. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2013, 12 (4): 597- 605.
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.003 |
|
Gillner S, Vogt J, Tharang A, et al. Role of street trees in mitigating effects of heat and drought at highly sealed urban sites. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 143, 33- 42.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.005 |
|
Gonçalves B, Correia C M, Silva A P, et al. Variation in xylem structure and function in roots and stems of scion-rootstock combinations of sweet cherry tree (Prunus avium L. ) . Trees—Structure and Function, 2007, 21 (2): 121- 130.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-006-0102-2 |
|
Hacke U G, Sperry J S, Wheeler J K, et al. Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency. Tree Physiology, 2006, 26 (6): 689- 701.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/26.6.689 |
|
Kunert N, Tomaskova I. Leaf turgor loss point at full hydration for 41 native and introduced tree and shrub species from Central Europe. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 13 (6): 754- 756.
doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtaa059 |
|
Kunz J, Löffler G, Bauhus J. Minor European broadleaved tree species are more drought-tolerant than Fagus sylvatica but not more tolerant than Quercus petraea . Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 414 (2): 15- 27. | |
Kuster T M, Dobbertin M, Günthardt-Goerg M S, et al. A phenological timetable of oak growth under experimental drought and air warming. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9 (2): e89724.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089724 |
|
Łabȩdzki, L. Estimation of local drought frequency in central Poland using the standardized precipitation index SPI. Irrigation and Drainage, 2007, 56 (1): 67- 77.
doi: 10.1002/ird.285 |
|
Larysch E, Stangler D F, Nazari M, et al. Xylem phenology and growth response of european beech, silver fir and Scots pine along an elevational gradient during the extreme drought year 2018. Forests, 2021, 12 (1): 75.
doi: 10.3390/f12010075 |
|
Leuschner C, Wedde P, Lübbe T. The relation between pressure–volume curve traits and stomatal regulation of water potential in five temperate broadleaf tree species. Annals of Forest Science, 2019, 76 (2): 1- 14. | |
Li S, Feifel M, Karimi Z, et al. Leaf gas exchange performance and the lethal water potential of five European species during drought. Tree Physiology, 2015, 36 (2): 179- 192. | |
Litvak E, McCarthy H R, Pataki D E. Transpiration sensitivity of urban trees in a semi-arid climate is constrained by xylem vulnerability to cavitation. Tree Physiology, 2012, 32 (4): 373- 388.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps015 |
|
Lübbe T, Schuldt B, Leuschner C. Acclimation of leaf water status and stem hydraulics to drought and tree neighbourhood: alternative strategies among the saplings of five temperate deciduous tree species. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37 (4): 456- 468.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw095 |
|
Marsal J, Girona J. Effects of water stress cycles on turgor maintenance processes in pear leaves (Pyrus communis) . Tree Physiology, 1997, 17 (5): 327- 333.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/17.5.327 |
|
Mrad A, Sevanto S, Domec J C, et al. A dynamic optimality principle for water use strategies explains isohydric to anisohydric plant responses to drought. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2019, 2, 49. | |
Nardini A, Pedà G, La Rocca N. Trade-offs between leaf hydraulic capacity and drought vulnerability: morpho-anatomical bases, carbon costs and ecological consequences. New Phytologist, 2012, 196 (3): 788- 798.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04294.x |
|
Naresh K M, Murthy C S, Sesha S M V R, et al. On the use of Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) for drought intensity assessment. Meteorological Applications, 2009, 16 (3): 381- 389.
doi: 10.1002/met.136 |
|
Nitschke C R, Nichols S, Allen K, et al. The influence of climate and drought on urban tree growth in southeast Australia and the implications for future growth under climate change. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, 167, 275- 287.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.012 |
|
Ogasa M, Miki N H, Okamoto M, et al. Water loss regulation to soil drought associated with xylem vulnerability to cavitation in temperate ring-porous and diffuse-porous tree seedlings. Trees—Structure and Function, 2014, 28 (2): 461- 469.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0963-0 |
|
Ordóñez C, Duinker P N. Assessing the vulnerability of urban forests to climate change. Environmental Reviews, 2014, 22 (3): 311- 321.
doi: 10.1139/er-2013-0078 |
|
Ordóñez C, Duinker P N. Climate change vulnerability assessment of the urban forest in three Canadian cities. Climatic Change, 2015, 131 (4): 531- 543.
doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1394-2 |
|
Percival G C, Keary I P, AL-Habsi S. An assessment of the drought tolerance of Fraxinus genotypes for urban landscape plantings . Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2006, 5 (1): 17- 27.
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.03.002 |
|
Petruzzellis F, Savi T, Bacaro G, et al. A simplified framework for fast and reliable measurement of leaf turgor loss point. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2019, 139, 395- 399.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.03.043 |
|
Pichler P, Oberhuber W. Radial growth response of coniferous forest trees in an inner Alpine environment to heat-wave in 2003. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 242 (2/3): 688- 699.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.02.007 |
|
Pretzsch H. The course of tree growth: theory and reality. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 478, 118508.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118508 |
|
Rahmati M, Davarynejad G H, Génard M, et al. Peach water relations, gas exchange, growth and shoot mortality under water deficit in semi-arid weather conditions. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10 (4): 1- 19. | |
Ranney T G, Whitlow T H, Bassuk N L. Response of five temperate deciduous tree species to water stress. Tree Physiology, 1990, 6 (4): 439- 448.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/6.4.439 |
|
Rigling A, Bräker O, Schneiter G, et al. Intra-annual tree-ring parameters indicating differences in drought stress of Pinus sylvestris forests within the Erico-Pinion in the Valais (Switzerland) . Plant Ecology, 2002, 163 (1): 105- 121.
doi: 10.1023/A:1020355407821 |
|
Roloff A. Morphology of crown development of Fagus sylvatica L. (beech) in consideration of new modifications i. morphogenetic cycle, abnormalities specific to proleptic shoots and leaf fall . Flora, 1987, 179 (5): 355- 378.
doi: 10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30269-4 |
|
Sade N, Gebremedhin A, Moshelion M. Risk-taking plants: anisohydric behavior as a stress-resistance trait. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 2012, 7 (7): 767- 770.
doi: 10.4161/psb.20505 |
|
Sæbø A, Benedikz T, Randrup T B. Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2003, 2 (2): 101- 114.
doi: 10.1078/1618-8667-00027 |
|
Savi T, Casolo V, Luglio J, et al. Species-specific reversal of stem xylem embolism after a prolonged drought correlates to endpoint concentration of soluble sugars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 106, 198- 207.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.051 |
|
Sjöman H, Hirons A D, Bassuk N L. Urban forest resilience through tree selection—Variation in drought tolerance in Acer. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2015, 14 (4): 858- 865.
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.004 |
|
Sjöman H, Hirons A D, Bassuk N L. Improving confidence in tree species selection for challenging urban sites: a role for leaf turgor loss. Urban Ecosystems, 2018, 21 (6): 1171- 1188.
doi: 10.1007/s11252-018-0791-5 |
|
Taneda H, Sperry J S. A case-study of water transport in co-occurring ring- versus diffuse-porous trees: contrasts in water-status, conducting capacity, cavitation and vessel refilling. Tree Physiology, 2008, 28 (11): 1641- 1651.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.11.1641 |
|
Tsuda M, Tyree M T. Whole-plant hydraulic resistance and vulnerability segmentation in Acer saccharinum. Tree Physiology, 1997, 17 (6): 351- 357.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/17.6.351 |
|
Vanhellemont M, Sousa-Silva R, Maes S L, et al. Distinct growth responses to drought for oak and beech in temperate mixed forests. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650, 3017- 3026.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.054 |
|
Wei L, Xu C G, Jansen S, et al. A heuristic classification of woody plants based on contrasting shade and drought strategies. Tree Physiology, 2019, 39 (5): 767- 781.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy146 |
|
Yi K, Dragoni D, Phillips R P, et al. Dynamics of stem water uptake among isohydric and anisohydric species experiencing a severe drought. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37 (10): 1379- 1392. | |
Yin J J, Bauerle T L. A global analysis of plant recovery performance from water stress. Oikos, 2017, 126 (10): 1377- 1388.
doi: 10.1111/oik.04534 |
|
Zhu S D, Chen Y J, Ye Q, et al. Leaf turgor loss point is correlated with drought tolerance and leaf carbon economics traits. Tree Physiology, 2018, 38 (5): 658- 663.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpy013 |
|
Zimmermann J, Link R M, Hauck M, et al. 60-year record of stem xylem anatomy and related hydraulic modification under increased summer drought in ring-and diffuse-porous temperate broad-leaved tree species. Trees, 2021, 35 (3): 919- 937.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-021-02090-2 |
[1] | Jingting Wang,Shouyin Li,Zhuang Zuo,Wenxuan Xu,Dejun Hao. Growth, Development and the Resistance Gene Transcriptional Expression of Pagiophloeus tsushimanus(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae after Feeding on Linalool and Eucalyptol [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(5): 109-120. |
[2] | Xin Cheng,Chunze Wu,Qingyu Wei,Wei Li,Xing Wei. Growth and Physiological Responses of Fraxinus mandshurica Seedlings Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi to Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(2): 58-66. |
[3] | Junjie Zhang,Qing Liu,Xiao Wei,Jianjun Zhang,Tinghong Guo. Influence of Light Intensity on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Garcinia paucinervis seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(5): 53-64. |
[4] | Xiaoting Li,Tong Li,Kuanbiao Qiu,Shasha Jiang,Baoquan Jia. Relationship between Patterns of Urban Forest Patches and Their Cooling Effects——A Case Study of Beijing Urban Area [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 32-42. |
[5] | Hongkai Liu,Xu Chen,Mingzhong Zhang,Qiang Wang,Yanping Wang. Anatomical Characteristics of Fine Roots of 11 Tree Species in the Hilly Mountainous Areas in Central Shandong Province and Their Drought Resistance Strategies [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(7): 185-193. |
[6] | Haixuan Liu,Ju Wu,Lijuan Xu,Chengyang Xu. Selection of Canopy Structure Index of Urban Forest Associated with Comfort Degree of Microclimate Within the Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(2): 32-39. |
[7] | Zezhou Hao,Cheng Wang,Nancai Pei,Xinhui Xu,Chang Zhang,Wenjun Duan,Ziyan Wang. Diversity of Soundscape in Three Urban Forests in Spring, Shenzhen [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(2): 184-192. |
[8] | Liu Haixuan, Xu Lijuan, Wu Ju, Xu Chengyang. Advances in studies on Influential Factors for Cooling Effect of Urban Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 144-151. |
[9] | Liu Shuai, Li Jianjun, Li Dan, Zhu Kaiwen, Guo Rui, Wen Yijun, Ma Zhenyan. Comparison and Adaptability of Analytical Methods for Spatial Distribution Patterns in Forst [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 73-84. |
[10] | Chen Wei, Yang Fei, Wang Juanle, Cheng Shulan. Integrated Quantitative Evaluation of Resilience of Subtropical Forest Ecosystem Disturbed by Freezing Ice and Snow Frozen Disaster: Take Daoxian County for Example [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(6): 1-8. |
[11] | Zhang Junjie, Chai Shengfeng, Wei Xiao, Lv Shihong, Wu Shaohua. Germination Characteristics of the Seed of a Rare and Endangered Plant, Garcinia paucinervis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(4): 174-185. |
[12] | Shi Yan, Ge Ying, Jin Hexian, Ren Yuan, Qu Zelong, Bao Zhiyi, Chang Jie. Progress in Studies on Carbon Sequestration of Urban Vegetation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(6): 122-129. |
[13] | Wang Huixia, Wang Yanhui, Yang Jia, Xie Binze, Shi Hui. Multi-Scale Comparisons of Particulate Matter and Its Size Fractions Deposited on Leaf Surfaces of Major Greening Tree Species [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(7): 9-20. |
[14] | Dong Zhouyan, Bai Xinfu, Hou Yuping, Bu Qingmei. Leaf Calorific Value of 8 Tree Species in the Coastal Areas of Jiaodong and Cost of Construction of Leaf Biomass and Its Adaptability [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(3): 8-15. |
[15] | Chen Yong, Sun Bing, Liao Shaobo, Luo Shuixing, Chen Lei, Cai Gang. Scenic Beauty Estimation of In-Forest Landscapes in Shenzhen Urban Forests [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(8): 39-44. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||