Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 1-13.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210401
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ke Guo1,Cunde Pan1,*,Gebi Yu2,Guihua Li3,Fan Zhang1,Zhuoying Zou1,Bo Liu1
Received:
2019-09-18
Online:
2021-04-25
Published:
2021-05-21
Contact:
Cunde Pan
CLC Number:
Ke Guo,Cunde Pan,Gebi Yu,Guihua Li,Fan Zhang,Zhuoying Zou,Bo Liu. Linkage between Herbaceous Layer and Overstorey Species along the Pyrogenic Successions in Kanas Taiga Communities[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(4): 1-13.
Table 1
Correlation coefficient of CCA ordination axis of herbaceous layer and overstorey species at different succession stages for taiga communities after high-severity fire"
因子 Factors | 演替前期 Early stage of succession | 演替中期 Middle stage of succession | 演替后期 Late stage of succession | |||||||||||
草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | 草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | 草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | |||||||||
Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | |||
Elev | -0.360* | 0.285 | -0.110 | 0.051 | 0.361* | 0.113 | -0.163 | 0.167 | 0.275 | -0.064 | -0.041 | -0.111 | ||
Slop | 0.166 | -0.171 | 0.295 | 0.066 | 0.203 | 0.048 | -0.147 | 0.063 | -0.131 | -0.090 | -0.047 | 0.030 | ||
TRASP | -0.069 | -0.233 | -0.038 | 0.019 | 0.003 | -0.197 | -0.085 | 0.031 | 0.013 | 0.004 | -0.067 | 0.053 | ||
PFT | 0.011 | 0.213 | -0.048 | -0.001 | -0.175 | -0.038 | 0.082 | -0.291 | -0.086 | 0.102 | -0.085 | -0.186 | ||
pH | 0.264 | -0.395* | 0.074 | -0.051 | -0.376* | -0.207 | 0.050 | -0.109 | -0.430** | 0.118 | 0.189 | -0.047 | ||
Con | -0.190 | 0.033 | 0.151 | -0.020 | 0.077 | -0.068 | 0.117 | -0.158 | -0.197 | 0.142 | 0.271 | -0.040 | ||
SBD | 0.220 | 0.120 | -0.279 | 0.286 | -0.136 | 0.310* | -0.079 | 0.030 | -0.100 | -0.188 | -0.125 | -0.157 | ||
Poro | -0.334* | 0.052 | 0.268 | -0.040 | 0.213 | -0.310* | 0.205 | -0.040 | 0.246 | 0.020 | -0.211 | -0.022 | ||
Org | 0.009 | -0.452** | 0.264 | 0.054 | -0.261 | -0.031 | -0.147 | 0.113 | -0.071 | -0.221 | 0.099 | 0.155 | ||
TN | 0.110 | -0.244 | 0.328* | 0.125 | -0.141 | -0.042 | 0.363* | 0.174 | -0.352* | -0.088 | 0.350* | 0.087 | ||
TK | 0.163 | -0.201 | 0.068 | 0.196 | -0.140 | -0.305* | 0.193 | 0.160 | -0.027 | -0.081 | -0.066 | 0.097 | ||
TP | 0.267 | -0.375* | 0.070 | 0.065 | -0.259 | -0.150 | -0.222 | 0.048 | -0.359* | 0.137 | -0.359* | 0.088 | ||
AN | 0.014 | -0.238 | 0.154 | -0.010 | -0.081 | 0.012 | 0.130 | 0.131 | -0.181 | -0.089 | 0.330* | 0.103 | ||
AK | 0.145 | 0.083 | -0.320* | 0.033 | -0.047 | 0.312* | -0.312* | 0.146 | -0.018 | -0.308* | 0.100 | 0.138 | ||
AP | 0.181 | 0.118 | -0.421** | 0.073 | 0.026 | 0.149 | -0.311* | 0.184 | 0.116 | -0.087 | 0.113 | 0.168 | ||
Fe | -0.176 | -0.154 | 0.066 | 0.143 | 0.118 | -0.105 | -0.093 | 0.061 | 0.117 | -0.313* | -0.376* | 0.188 | ||
Cu | -0.091 | -0.345* | 0.483** | -0.322* | -0.316* | -0.220 | -0.048 | -0.521** | -0.236 | 0.324* | 0.014 | -0.166 | ||
Zn | 0.111 | -0.119 | 0.062 | 0.054 | -0.204 | 0.309* | -0.181 | 0.091 | -0.167 | -0.101 | 0.316* | 0.165 | ||
Mn | 0.086 | 0.002 | -0.031 | 0.410* | 0.094 | 0.113 | 0.225 | 0.443** | 0.110 | -0.013 | 0.183 | 0.071 | ||
Mg | -0.348* | 0.309 | -0.067 | 0.188 | 0.211 | 0.086 | 0.145 | 0.154 | 0.232 | -0.212 | 0.085 | -0.150 | ||
Ca | -0.130 | 0.473* | -0.110 | 0.155 | 0.327* | 0.149 | 0.088 | 0.016 | 0.273 | -0.153 | 0.146 | -0.227 | ||
LAI | 0.207 | -0.065 | 0.248 | 0.304 | 0.199 | -0.065 | -0.150 | -0.051 | 0.016 | 0.221 | -0.080 | 0.321* | ||
Pc | 0.163 | -0.037 | 0.160 | 0.185 | 0.230 | -0.114 | -0.157 | -0.068 | 0.012 | 0.307* | -0.108 | 0.317* | ||
DBH | -0.129 | -0.145 | -0.325* | 0.036 | -0.051 | -0.142 | -0.017 | 0.143 | 0.078 | -0.042 | 0.066 | 0.005 | ||
Dt | 0.420* | 0.375* | -0.025 | 0.072 | 0.146 | 0.149 | -0.064 | -0.227 | -0.168 | -0.192 | -0.228 | -0.015 | ||
HD | -0.045 | 0.099 | -0.452** | 0.089 | 0.118 | 0.036 | -0.052 | 0.196 | 0.243 | -0.132 | 0.159 | 0.053 |
Table 2
Correlation coefficient of CCA ordination axis of herbaceous layer and overstorey species at different succession stages for taiga communities after moderate-severity fire"
因子 Factors | 演替前期 Early stage of succession | 演替中期 Middle stage of succession | 演替后期 Late stage of succession | |||||||||||
草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | 草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | 草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | |||||||||
Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | |||
Elev | -0.515** | -0.033 | -0.056 | -0.306* | 0.137 | 0.336* | -0.345* | 0.056 | -0.458** | 0.044 | -0.346* | -0.098 | ||
Slop | 0.204 | 0.005 | 0.115 | -0.067 | 0.106 | -0.011 | 0.235 | 0.025 | -0.107 | 0.064 | -0.084 | 0.008 | ||
TRASP | -0.034 | 0.054 | 0.045 | -0.019 | 0.153 | -0.101 | 0.107 | 0.165 | -0.172 | -0.046 | 0.033 | -0.099 | ||
PFT | -0.089 | -0.006 | 0.241 | -0.059 | -0.043 | 0.007 | -0.283 | 0.159 | -0.087 | 0.109 | 0.067 | 0.059 | ||
pH | 0.336* | -0.072 | 0.062 | 0.281 | 0.057 | 0.048 | 0.214 | -0.036 | 0.142 | -0.015 | 0.134 | 0.097 | ||
Con | 0.322* | 0.045 | 0.083 | 0.206 | -0.096 | -0.266 | -0.123 | 0.161 | -0.318* | -0.112 | 0.103 | 0.060 | ||
SBD | 0.180 | -0.117 | -0.125 | 0.136 | 0.026 | 0.297 | -0.024 | -0.069 | 0.141 | 0.219 | -0.253 | -0.153 | ||
Poro | -0.547** | 0.111 | -0.061 | -0.345* | -0.227 | 0.133 | -0.612** | -0.175 | -0.206 | 0.015 | 0.038 | 0.189 | ||
Org | 0.067 | 0.373* | 0.303 | -0.125 | -0.125 | -0.250 | -0.174 | 0.437** | -0.165 | 0.021 | 0.361* | -0.131 | ||
TN | 0.003 | 0.439** | 0.325* | -0.177 | -0.330* | -0.196 | -0.484** | 0.379 | -0.407* | -0.102 | 0.407* | -0.256 | ||
TK | -0.413* | 0.005 | -0.141 | -0.210 | -0.131 | -0.358* | -0.275 | 0.062 | -0.324* | 0.063 | 0.203 | -0.383* | ||
TP | -0.006 | 0.230 | 0.120 | -0.147 | 0.020 | 0.195 | -0.154 | 0.089 | 0.164 | -0.342* | 0.378* | -0.141 | ||
AN | 0.105 | 0.427** | 0.202 | -0.073 | -0.073 | -0.311* | 0.015 | 0.306 | -0.052 | -0.163 | 0.381* | -0.091 | ||
AK | 0.020 | 0.259 | 0.082 | 0.102 | -0.152 | 0.066 | 0.286 | 0.043 | -0.038 | -0.011 | 0.156 | -0.046 | ||
AP | -0.174 | -0.042 | -0.084 | 0.099 | 0.337* | 0.247 | 0.643** | 0.080 | 0.085 | 0.117 | -0.372* | -0.238 | ||
Fe | -0.180 | 0.058 | -0.334* | -0.063 | 0.035 | 0.149 | 0.492** | -0.205 | -0.246 | 0.387* | -0.174 | -0.348* | ||
Cu | 0.420** | 0.109 | 0.200 | -0.108 | 0.057 | -0.025 | -0.269 | 0.125 | -0.117 | -0.450* | 0.001 | 0.068 | ||
Zn | 0.203 | 0.245 | 0.326* | 0.104 | -0.251 | 0.047 | -0.001 | 0.228 | -0.087 | -0.108 | -0.069 | -0.386* | ||
Mn | -0.124 | 0.011 | 0.156 | -0.007 | -0.274 | 0.013 | -0.165 | 0.196 | -0.192 | 0.000 | 0.058 | -0.196 | ||
Mg | -0.434** | 0.163 | -0.165 | -0.159 | -0.353* | -0.275 | -0.370* | -0.228 | -0.280 | 0.004 | 0.072 | 0.174 | ||
Ca | -0.107 | -0.133 | -0.048 | 0.333* | -0.155 | -0.340* | -0.094 | -0.037 | -0.224 | 0.054 | 0.106 | 0.064 | ||
LAI | 0.443** | -0.241 | -0.082 | 0.077 | -0.231 | 0.051 | -0.120 | -0.081 | 0.240 | -0.036 | -0.111 | 0.135 | ||
Pc | 0.416** | -0.221 | -0.025 | 0.063 | -0.250 | 0.078 | -0.091 | -0.125 | 0.166 | 0.122 | -0.140 | 0.184 | ||
DBH | 0.234 | -0.020 | 0.005 | -0.025 | -0.071 | -0.052 | -0.324* | 0.294 | 0.096 | -0.159 | 0.212 | -0.079 | ||
Dt | -0.076 | -0.009 | 0.065 | -0.197 | 0.214 | -0.113 | -0.022 | -0.024 | 0.094 | -0.001 | -0.175 | -0.127 | ||
HD | 0.181 | -0.026 | -0.085 | 0.156 | -0.225 | 0.065 | -0.357* | 0.094 | 0.029 | 0.175 | -0.229 | -0.052 |
Table 3
Correlation coefficient of CCA ordination axis of herbaceous layer and overstorey species at different succession stages for taiga communities after low-severity fire"
因子 Factors | 演替前期 Early stage of succession | 演替中期 Middle stage of succession | 演替后期 Late stage of succession | |||||||||||
草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | 草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | 草本层 Herbaceous layer | 林冠层 Overstorey | |||||||||
Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | Ax1 | Ax2 | |||
Elev | -0.578** | 0.318* | -0.197 | 0.341* | -0.333* | 0.268 | -0.239 | -0.423** | -0.342* | -0.107 | -0.385* | 0.126 | ||
Slop | -0.260 | -0.089 | 0.152 | 0.386* | -0.033 | 0.125 | 0.044 | 0.146 | 0.103 | -0.217 | 0.001 | -0.056 | ||
TRASP | 0.182 | 0.119 | 0.352* | 0.155 | 0.127 | 0.199 | 0.007 | -0.122 | 0.060 | -0.073 | 0.131 | -0.043 | ||
PFT | 0.087 | 0.324* | 0.364* | 0.239 | 0.244 | 0.268 | -0.126 | -0.201 | 0.340* | -0.025 | -0.019 | -0.187 | ||
pH | 0.088 | 0.228 | -0.181 | -0.025 | 0.129 | -0.270 | -0.123 | 0.217 | -0.110 | 0.021 | -0.037 | -0.153 | ||
Con | -0.071 | -0.008 | -0.341* | -0.135 | -0.076 | 0.044 | -0.307* | 0.140 | -0.016 | -0.078 | 0.185 | -0.139 | ||
SBD | -0.037 | -0.021 | 0.161 | 0.112 | 0.029 | 0.463** | 0.074 | 0.040 | -0.017 | -0.200 | -0.046 | 0.094 | ||
Poro | -0.200 | 0.114 | 0.191 | 0.077 | -0.380* | 0.342* | -0.134 | -0.086 | 0.019 | 0.303* | -0.057 | -0.143 | ||
Org | -0.093 | -0.055 | -0.009 | -0.187 | 0.160 | -0.530** | -0.323* | 0.260 | -0.020 | -0.149 | 0.304* | -0.107 | ||
TN | -0.254 | -0.077 | 0.303 | -0.254 | -0.109 | -0.016 | -0.202 | 0.190 | -0.018 | -0.107 | 0.368* | 0.021 | ||
TK | -0.350* | -0.193 | 0.011 | 0.208 | -0.364* | 0.160 | -0.086 | -0.050 | -0.020 | 0.302* | -0.169 | 0.324* | ||
TP | -0.257 | -0.152 | 0.079 | 0.078 | 0.207 | -0.119 | -0.163 | 0.119 | 0.114 | -0.264 | -0.014 | -0.116 | ||
AN | 0.077 | -0.318* | 0.167 | -0.070 | 0.090 | 0.009 | -0.221 | 0.320* | -0.020 | -0.004 | -0.020 | -0.023 | ||
AK | -0.257 | 0.069 | -0.451** | 0.028 | 0.099 | 0.178 | 0.159 | 0.210 | -0.014 | 0.201 | -0.065 | 0.076 | ||
AP | 0.164 | 0.237 | 0.113 | 0.023 | 0.281 | 0.120 | 0.104 | 0.315 | 0.022 | 0.301* | -0.309* | -0.100 | ||
Fe | 0.125 | -0.188 | 0.176 | -0.390* | 0.091 | -0.003 | 0.057 | 0.106 | 0.002 | -0.155 | 0.021 | 0.059 | ||
Cu | 0.089 | -0.060 | -0.035 | -0.273 | -0.134 | -0.624** | -0.320* | -0.121 | -0.091 | -0.534** | 0.358* | -0.198 | ||
Zn | -0.414* | -0.345* | -0.145 | 0.008 | -0.065 | -0.458** | 0.040 | 0.103 | -0.125 | -0.345* | 0.034 | 0.074 | ||
Mn | -0.176 | 0.184 | 0.037 | 0.111 | -0.082 | 0.270 | 0.040 | 0.093 | 0.042 | -0.135 | -0.003 | -0.136 | ||
Mg | -0.054 | 0.166 | -0.041 | 0.176 | -0.427** | 0.331* | -0.058 | -0.079 | 0.111 | -0.164 | -0.015 | 0.131 | ||
Ca | 0.226 | 0.437** | -0.055 | -0.064 | -0.100 | 0.170 | -0.005 | -0.064 | -0.091 | -0.058 | 0.133 | 0.063 | ||
LAI | 0.187 | -0.140 | -0.074 | 0.177 | 0.141 | 0.285 | -0.101 | 0.086 | 0.129 | 0.004 | 0.136 | -0.115 | ||
Pc | 0.239 | -0.114 | -0.097 | 0.195 | 0.158 | 0.234 | -0.096 | 0.107 | 0.160 | 0.010 | 0.188 | -0.124 | ||
DBH | -0.180 | 0.059 | -0.274 | -0.262 | -0.017 | -0.041 | -0.184 | -0.140 | 0.082 | -0.260 | 0.083 | -0.138 | ||
Dt | 0.462** | -0.086 | 0.490** | -0.002 | -0.433** | -0.185 | -0.317* | -0.108 | 0.066 | -0.174 | 0.123 | -0.133 | ||
HD | 0.028 | 0.024 | -0.544** | -0.103 | 0.009 | -0.047 | -0.321* | 0.275 | 0.341* | -0.180 | -0.101 | -0.311* |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 25- 151. | |
Bao S D . Soil Agrochemical Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 25- 151. | |
郭珂, 潘存德, 李贵华, 等. 基于MRT的喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落数量分类. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38 (6): 1926- 1936. | |
Guo K , Pan C D , Li G H , et al. Using multivariate regression trees to classify communities along the pyrogenic successions in Kanas taiga, Xinjiang. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2019, 38 (6): 1926- 1936. | |
刘翠玲. 2009. 新疆喀纳斯森林景观美学质量形成机制与自然火干扰体制研究. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学博士学位论文, 65-72. | |
Liu C L. 2009. Study on formation of forest scenery aesthetic quality and natural fire disturbance regime of forest in Kanas, Xinjiang. Urumqi: PhD thesis of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 65-72. [in Chinese] | |
刘景, 潘存德, 余戈壁, 等. 火干扰烈度对喀纳斯针叶阔叶林主要植物种生态位的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54 (11): 1961- 1971.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.11.001 |
|
Liu J , Pan C D , Yu G B , et al. Effects of fire severity on niche of main species in the coniferous broad-leaved forest in Kanas, Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54 (11): 1961- 1971.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2017.11.001 |
|
苗庆林, 田晓瑞, 赵凤君. 大兴安岭不同植被火后NDVI恢复过程. 林业科学, 2015, 51 (2): 90- 98. | |
Miao Q L , Tian X R , Zhao F J . NDVI recovery process for post-fire vegetation in Daxing'anling. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51 (2): 90- 98. | |
潘晓玲, 张宏达. 哈纳斯自然保护区植被特点及植物区系形成的探讨. 干旱区研究, 1994, 11 (4): 1- 7. | |
Pan X L , Zhang H D . Character of vegetation and research on forming of flora in Kanas. Arid Zone Research, 1994, 11 (4): 1- 7. | |
孙家宝. 2010. 火干扰后大兴安岭兴安落叶松林群落动态研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学博士学位论文, 23-55. | |
Sun J B. 2010. The dynamic study on plant community of Larix gmelinii in Daxing'an Mountain after fire disturbance. Harbin: PhD thesis of Northeast Forestry University, 23-55. [in Chinese] | |
唐志尧, 方精云. 植物物种多样性的垂直分布格局. 生物多样性, 2004, 12 (1): 20- 28.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2004.01.004 |
|
Tang Z Y , Fang J Y . A review on the elevational patterns of plant species diversity. Biodiversity Science, 2004, 12 (1): 20- 28.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2004.01.004 |
|
王忠. 植物生理学. 2版 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009: 80- 88. | |
Wang Z . Plant Physiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009: 80- 88. | |
吴征镒. 中国植被. 北京: 科学出版社, 1980: 760 | |
Wu Z Y . Chinese Vegetation. Beijing: Science Press, 1980: 760 | |
邢玮. 2006. 大兴安岭北部林区林火干扰强度对森林群落影响研究. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文, 15-39. | |
Xing W. 2006. Effect of fire severity on forest communities in the northern great Xing'an Mountains. Beijing: MS thesis of Beijing Forestry University, 23-55. [in Chinese] | |
杨健, 孔健健, 刘波. 林火干扰对北方针叶林林下植被的影响. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37 (5): 474- 480. | |
Yang J , Kong J J , Liu B . A review of effects of fire disturbance on understory vegetation in boreal coniferous forest. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37 (5): 474- 480. | |
杨玉萍, 潘存德, 余戈壁, 等. 喀纳斯泰加林群落与环境和火干扰因子的关系. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (5): 114- 124. | |
Yang Y P , Pan C D , Yu G B , et al. Relationship between taiga forest communities and environment factors in the Kanas and fire disturbance factors. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (5): 114- 124. | |
余敏, 周志勇, 康峰峰, 等. 山西灵空山小蛇沟林下草本层植物群落梯度分析及环境解释. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37 (5): 373- 383. | |
Yu M , Zhou Z Y , Kang F F , et al. Gradient analysis and environmental interpretation of understory herb-layer communities in Xiaoshegou of Lingkong Mountain, Shanxi, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37 (5): 373- 383. | |
曾晓阳, 高永恒. 青城山常绿阔叶林冠层结构对植被生物多样性的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2017, 52 (2): 65- 70. | |
Zeng X Y , Gao Y H . Effect of canopy structure on plant diversity of evergreen broadleaved forest in Qingcheng Mountain. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2017, 52 (2): 65- 70. | |
张荟荟. 2008. 新疆喀纳斯旅游区森林群落物种多样性特征研究. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学硕士学位论文, 39-54. | |
Zhang H H. 2008. Study on species diversity characteristics of forest community in kanasi tourism region of Xinjiang. Urumqi: MS thesis of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 39-54. [in Chinese] | |
中国科学院新疆综合考察队, 中国科学院植物研究所. 新疆植被及其利用. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978: 151 | |
Xinjiang Comprehensive Scientific Survey of the Chinese Academy of Sciences , Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences . Vegetation of Xinjiang and Its Use. Beijing: Science Press, 1978: 151 | |
Barbier S , Gosselin F , Balandier P . Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 254, 1- 15.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038 |
|
Bartels S F , Chen H Y H . Dynamics of epiphytic macrolichen abundance, diversity and composition in boreal forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 52 (1): 181- 189.
doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12360 |
|
Beatty S W. 2014. Habitat heterogeneity and maintenance of species in understory communities//Gilliam F S. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 215-232. | |
Borchsenius F , Nielsen P K , Lawesson J E . Vegetation structure and diversity of an ancient temperate deciduous forest in SW Denmark. Plant Ecology, 2004, 175 (1): 121- 135.
doi: 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000048095.29961.c5 |
|
Burrascano S , Ripullone F , Bernardo L , et al. It's a long way to the top: plant species diversity in the transition from managed to old-growth forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2018, 29 (1): 98- 109.
doi: 10.1111/jvs.12588 |
|
Chávez V , Macdonald S E . Partitioning vascular understory diversity in mixedwood boreal forests: the importance of mixed canopies for diversity conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 271, 19- 26.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.038 |
|
Esseen P A , Ehnström B , Sjoberg K , et al. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins, 1997, 46, 16- 47. | |
Ewald J , Weihenstephan F . Multiple controls of understorey plant richness in mountain forests of the Bavarian Alps. Phytocoenologia, 2002, 32 (1): 85- 100.
doi: 10.1127/0340-269X/2002/0032-0085 |
|
Gagnon D , Bradfield G E . Relationships among forest strata and environment in southern coastal British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1986, 16, 1264- 1271.
doi: 10.1139/x86-224 |
|
George L O , Bazzaz F A . The fern understory as an ecological filter: Emergence and establishment of canopy-tree seedlings. Ecology, 1999, 80 (3): 833- 845.
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0833:TFUAAE]2.0.CO;2 |
|
Gilliam F S, Roberts M R. 2014. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests//Gilliam F S. The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 233-254. | |
Gilliam F S , Turrill N L , Adams M B . Herbaceous-layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecological Applications, 1995, 5 (4): 947- 955.
doi: 10.2307/2269345 |
|
Gilliam F S , Turrill N L . Herbaceous layer cover and biomass in a young versus a mature stand of a central Appalachian hardwood forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 1993, 120 (4): 445- 450.
doi: 10.2307/2996749 |
|
Graves J H , Peet R K , White P S . The influence of carbon-nutrient balance on herb and woody plant abundance in temperate forest understories. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2006, 17 (2): 217- 226. | |
Guo Y X , Zhao P , Bu J , et al. The differential responses of woody and herbaceous climbers to selective logging and supporter structure in a temperate forest of Xiaolong Mountain, China. Plant Ecology, 2019, 220 (3): 293- 304.
doi: 10.1007/s11258-019-00914-3 |
|
Hill J D , Silander J A . Distribution and dynamics of two ferns: Dennstaedtia punctilobula (Dennstaedtiaceae) and Thelypteris noveboracensis (Thelypteridaceae) in a northeast mixed hardwoods-hemlock forest. American Journal of Botany, 2001, 88 (5): 894- 902.
doi: 10.2307/2657041 |
|
Hoffmann R S . The meaning of the word "taiga". Ecology, 1958, 39 (3): 540- 541.
doi: 10.2307/1931768 |
|
Host G E , Pregitzer K S . Geomorphic influences on ground-flora and overstory composition in upland forests of northwestern lower Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1992, 22 (10): 1547- 1555.
doi: 10.1139/x92-205 |
|
Houle G . Determinants of fine-scale plant species richness in a deciduous forest of northeastern North America. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2007, 18, 345- 354.
doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02546.x |
|
Ingerpuu N , Vellak K , Liira J , et al. Relationships between species richness patterns in deciduous forests at the north Estonian limestone escarpment. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2003, 14 (5): 773- 780.
doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02209.x |
|
Jagodziński A M , Wierzcholska S , Dyderski M K , et al. Tree species effects on bryophyte guilds on a reclaimed post-mining site. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 110, 117- 127.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.10.015 |
|
Keeley J E . Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2009, 18, 116- 126.
doi: 10.1071/WF07049 |
|
Lieberman D , Lieberman M , Peralta R , et al. Tropical forest structure and composition on a large-scale altitudinal gradient in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology, 1996, 84 (2): 137- 152.
doi: 10.2307/2261350 |
|
Lyon J , Sagers C L . Structure of herbaceous plant assemblages in a forested riparian landscape. Plant Ecology, 1998, 138 (1): 1- 16.
doi: 10.1023/A:1009705912710 |
|
Maguire D A , Forman R T T . Herb cover effects on tree seedling patterns in a mature hemlock-hardwood forest. Ecology, 1983, 64 (6): 1367- 1380.
doi: 10.2307/1937491 |
|
Magurran A E . Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988: 26- 32. | |
Martin K L , Hix D M , Goebel P C . Coupling of vegetation layers and environmental influences in a mature, second-growth central hardwood forest landscape. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 261 (3): 720- 729.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.001 |
|
McCune B , Antos J A . Correlations between forest layers in the Swan Valley, Montana. Ecology, 1981, 62 (5): 1196- 1204.
doi: 10.2307/1937284 |
|
McIntosh A C S , Macdonald S E , Quideau S A . Understory plant community composition is associated with fine-scale above- and below-ground resource heterogeneity in mature Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta) forests. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11 (3): e0151436.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151436 |
|
Mölder A , Bernhardt-Römermann M , Schmidt W . Herb-layer diversity in deciduous forests: raised by tree richness or beaten by beech?. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256 (3): 272- 281.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.012 |
|
Nemati N , Goetz H . Relationships of overstory to understory cover variables in a Ponderosa pine/Gambel oak ecosystem. Vegetatio, 1995, 119 (1): 15- 21.
doi: 10.1007/BF00047367 |
|
Palmer M W . Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology, 1993, 74 (8): 2215- 2230.
doi: 10.2307/1939575 |
|
Patrick R , Strawbridge D . Variation in the structure of natural diatom communities. The American Naturalist, 1963, 97 (892): 51- 57.
doi: 10.1086/282253 |
|
Pielou E C . An introduction to mathematical ecology. Bioscience, 1969, 24 (2): 7- 12. | |
Rawlik M , Kasprowicz M , Jagodziński A M , et al. Canopy tree species determine herb layer biomass and species composition on a reclaimed mine spoil heap. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 635, 1205- 1214.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.133 |
|
Reich P B , Frelich L E , Voldseth R A , et al. Understorey diversity in southern boreal forests is regulated by productivity and its indirect impacts on resource availability and heterogeneity. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100, 539- 545.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01922.x |
|
Roberts D W, Cooper S V. 1989. Concepts and techniques of vegetation mapping//Ferguson D, Morgan P, Johnson F D. Land Classifications Based on Vegetation: Applications for Resource Management, General Technical Report INT-GTR-257. Ogden: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 90-96. | |
Roberts M R , Christensen N L . Vegetation variation among mesic successional forest stands in northern Lower Michigan. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1988, 66, 1080- 1090.
doi: 10.1139/b88-154 |
|
Sagers C L , Lyon J . Gradient analysis in a riparian landscape: contrasts among forest layers. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 96, 13- 26.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00050-9 |
|
Scherer S S , Kern C C , D'Amato A W , et al. Long-term pine regeneration, shrub layer dynamics, and understory community composition responses to repeated prescribed fire in Pinus resinosa forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2018, 48, 117- 129.
doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0345 |
|
Simpson E H . Measurement of diversity. Nature, 1949, 163 (4148): 688.
doi: 10.1038/163688a0 |
|
Song B , Chen J , Williams T M . Spatial relationships between canopy structure and understory vegetation of an old-growth Douglas-Fir forest. Forest Research, 2014, 3 (2): 1- 12. | |
Tilman D , Downing J A , Wedln D A . Does diversity beget stability?. Nature, 1994, 371 (6493): 113- 114.
doi: 10.1038/371114a0 |
|
Wilson A D , Shure D J . Plant competition and nutrient limitation during early succession in the southern Appalachian Mountains. The American Midland Naturalist, 1993, 129 (1): 1- 9.
doi: 10.2307/2426429 |
|
Yu M , Sun O J . Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 300, 14- 20.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.039 |
[1] | Ruizhi An,Peng Zhang,Zhen Da,Nanqian Qiao,Qiuyue Tang,Sang Ba. Niche and Interspecific Association of Dominant Protozoan Species Under Different Hydrologic Periods in the Mitika Wetland of Tibet, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(2): 126-138. |
[2] | Xue Dong, Yonghua Li, Zhiming Xin, Ruibing Duan, bin Yao, Yanfeng Bao, Zhengguo Zhang, Yuan Liu. Patterns of Altitudinal Distribution of Species Diversity of Desert Gobi Shrub Communities in West Hexi Corridor of China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(2): 168-178. |
[3] | Gengyun Niu,Xingyu Wu,Shuxin Liu,Yali Yang,Yaoyao Zhang,Meicai Wei. A New Species of Analcellicampa Wei(Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), Feeding in Fruit of the Cherry Cerasus pseudocerasus×Cerasus avium [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(1): 113-120. |
[4] | Moshun Chen,Zexin Jin,Shisheng Ke,Zilin Chen,Deyue Pan. Community Characteristics and Their Relations with Environmental Variables of Critically Endangered Species Carpinus tientaiensis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(9): 1-11. |
[5] | Lei Wang,Yifan Liang,Junqian Yang,Bingbing Zhang,Tao Wang,Xiuzhen Shi,Hangwei Hu,Zhiqun Huang. Characteristics of Soil nitrogen Retention and Related Functional Microorganism in Soils of Main Afforestation Species in Subtropical Region [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(8): 27-37. |
[6] | Yanhui Liu,Yiju Hou,Deyuan Shu,Bing Yang,Yingchun Cui,Fangjun Ding. Properties and Spatio-Temporal Variation of Leaf Retained Particulate Matters of the Main Tree Species Planted in Guiyang City [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(6): 12-25. |
[7] | Yuchen Yan,Zejian Li,Guihong Li,Meicai Wei. A New Species of Zaraea(Leach, 1817)(Hymenoptera, Cimbicidae) from China Harming Padus brachypoda [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(5): 105-112. |
[8] | Haiqing Hu,Bizhen Luo,Sisheng Luo,Shujing Wei,Zhenshi Wang,Xiaochuan Li,Fei Liu. Research Progress on Effects of Forest Fire Disturbance on Carbon Pool of Forest Ecosystem [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(4): 160-169. |
[9] | Zhongqi Yang,Xiaoyi Wang,Xin Zhong,Xin Liu,Liangming Cao,Haizhen Wang. A New Species of Pteromalus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) Parasitizing Pupa of Gynaephora qinghaiensis (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(2): 99-105. |
[10] | Zongda Hu,Shirong Liu,Xingliang Liu,Mingxia Luo,Jing Hu,Yafei Li,Hao Yu,Dinghua Ou,Deyong Wu. Characterization of Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Components in Three Natural Secondary Forests in Subalpine Regions of Western Sichuan, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 1-11. |
[11] | Lin Zhao,Xiaoli Zhang,Yanshuang Wu,Bin Zhang. Subtropical Forest Tree Species Classification Based on 3D-CNN for Airborne Hyperspectral Data [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 97-107. |
[12] | Lin Li,Shiguang Wei,Jiangming Ma,Wanhui Ye,Juyu Lian. Relative Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Dispersal Limitation on Species Diversity Maintenance in South Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(10): 1-10. |
[13] | Xusheng Li,Hu Li,Donghua Chen,Yufeng Liu,Saisai Liu,Congfang Liu,Guoqing Hu. Multiple Classifiers Combination Method for Tree Species Identification Based on GF-5 and GF-6 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(10): 93-104. |
[14] | Wang Wenjie, Du Hongju, Xiao Lu, Zhang Jianyu, Zhong Zhaoliang, Zhou Wei, Zhang Bo, Wang Hongyuan. Differences in Plant Composition and Forest Structure among of 3 Forest Types in Liangshui National Nature Reserve [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(9): 166-176. |
[15] | Wang Wei, Yang Junjie, Luo Xiaoying, Zhou Changjiang, Chen Shifa, Yang Zhijun, Hou Rongfeng, Chen Zaixiong, Li Yongsheng. Assessment of Potential Habitat for Firmiana danxiaensis, a Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations in Danxiashan National Nature Reserve Based on Maxent Model [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(8): 19-27. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||