天山中部雪岭云杉林多功能权衡与协同关系

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191102

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: This paper was carried out to analyze the trade-offs and synergies among forest supply(productivity), regulation(carbon sequestration and oxygen release, water conservation)and support(biodiversity)functions in order to provide a theoretical basis for multi-functional forest management. Method: The study was implemented on Picea schrenkiana forests in the central Tianshan Mountains region of Xinjiang, based on the data from 42 sample plots and 1 170 sub-compartments in forest resources class Ⅱ survey of Banfanggou forest farm. Four functions, including stand productivity, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, water conservation and biodiversity, were predicted by using random forest method. The correlation analysis was made among the four functions of the stand, and the correlation of stand average age, stand volume, average tree height, average DBH, canopy density, slope, altitude, and vegetation coverage with these functions. Result: The main factors those have great influences on stand productivity, water conservation, carbon sequestration, oxygen release and biodiversity are stand average DBH, volume, vegetation coverage, average forest age and canopy density. The correlation coefficient is 0.225-0.917(P < 0.01)between stand average age, tree height, DBH, canopy density, stand volume and four functions, comprehensive function. The correlation coefficient is 0.167-0.393(P < 0.01)between slope and water conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, biodiversity. The correlation coefficient between altitude and productivity, water conservation, comprehensive function is -0.264—-0.143(P < 0.01).There is a positive correlation between vegetation coverage and water conservation and biodiversity, the correlation coefficients are 0.237 and 0.081(P < 0.01), respectively. The correlation coefficient is 0.228-0.645(P < 0.01)with four functions, among which, the correlation between biodiversity and carbon sequestration and oxygen release is the highest. There is a synergistic relationship between the functions of the stands. Conclusion: There is a synergistic relationship among the four functions of Picea schrenkiana stands, harmonization of multiple functions could be achieved through rational forest management.

Key words: multi-functionality, trade-offs, synergies, random forest method, Picea schrenkiana stands

CLC Number:

S757

Jie Lan,Xiangdong Lei,Yutao Zhang. Analysis on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multiple Functions of Picea schrenkiana Forests in Central Tianshan Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 9-18.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Fig.3

References 0

	戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架. 地理研究, 2016. 35 (6): 1005- 1016.
	Dai E F , Wang X L , Zhu J J , et al. Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs. Geographical Research, 2016. 35 (6): 1005- 1016.
	冯明刚, 严伟, 葛新民, 等. 利用随机森林回归算法预测总有机碳含量. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2018. 37 (3): 475- 481.
	Feng M G , Yan W , Ge X M , et al. Predicting total organic carbon content by random forest regression algorithm. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2018. 37 (3): 475- 481.
	郝梦雅, 任志远, 孙艺杰, 等. 关中盆地生态系统服务的权衡与协同关系动态分析. 地理研究, 2017. 36 (3): 592- 602.
	Hao M Y , Ren Z Y , Sun Y J , et al. The dynamic analysis of trade-off and synergy of ecosystem services in the Guanzhong Basin. Geographical Research, 2017. 36 (3): 592- 602.
	黄继红, 路兴慧, 郭仲军. 新疆布尔津林场天然林生态系统服务功能评估. 干旱区研究, 2014. 31 (5): 866- 873.
	Huang J H , Lu X H , Guo Z J . Service functions of the natural forest ecosystem in Burqin forest farm, Xinjiang. Arid Zone Research, 2014. 31 (5): 866- 873.
	黄小荣. 广西马尾松林植物功能多样性与生产力的关系. 生物多样性, 2018. 26 (7): 690- 700. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018092
	Huang X R . Relationship between plant functional diversity and productivity of Pinus massoniana plantations in Guangxi. Biodiversity Science, 2018. 26 (7): 690- 700. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018092
	兰洁, 张毓涛, 师庆东, 等. 新疆天然林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 西北林学院学报, 2018. 33 (4): 289- 296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.04.46
	Lan J , Zhang Y T , Shi Q D , et al. Assessment of service functions value of the natural forest protection program in Xinjiang. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018. 33 (4): 289- 296. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.04.46
	李吉玫, 张毓涛, 白志强, 等. 新疆山地森林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 西南林业大学学报, 2016. 36 (4): 97- 102.
	Li J M , Zhang Y T , Bai Z Q , et al. Assessment of service functions value of mountain forest ecosystem in Xinjiang Province, China. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016. 36 (4): 97- 102.
	李鹏, 姜鲁光, 封志明, 等. 生态系统服务竞争与协同研究进展. 生态学报, 2012. 32 (16): 5219- 5229. doi: 10.5846/stxb201109161360
	Li P , Jiang L G , Feng Z M , et al. Research progress on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services:an overview. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012. 32 (16): 5219- 5229. doi: 10.5846/stxb201109161360
	李偲, 海米提·依米提, 李晓东. 喀纳斯自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011. 25 (10): 92- 97.
	Li S , Hai M T , Li X D . Evaluation of the service value of the forest ecosystem in Kanas natural reserve. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011. 25 (10): 92- 97.
	刘胜涛, 高鹏, 刘潘伟, 等. 泰山森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估. 生态学报, 2017. 37 (10): 3302- 3310.
	Liu S T , Gao P , Liu P W , et al. An ecosystem services assessment of Tai Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017. 37 (10): 3302- 3310.
	潘竟虎, 李真. 干旱内陆河流域生态系统服务空间权衡与协同作用分析. 农业工程学报, 2017. 33 (17): 280- 289. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.17.037
	Pan J H , Li Z . Analysis on trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in arid inland river basin. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017. 33 (17): 280- 289. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.17.037
	钱彩云, 巩杰, 张金茜, 等. 甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系. 地理学报, 2018. 73 (5): 868- 879.
	Qian C Y , Gong J , Zhang J Q , et al. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services:a case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018. 73 (5): 868- 879.
	孙洪波, 王让会, 张慧芝, 等. 新疆山地-绿洲-荒漠系统及其气候特征. 干旱区地理, 2005. (2): 199- 203. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6060.2005.02.012
	Sun H B , Wang R H , Zhang H Z , et al. Mountain-oasis-desert system and characteristics of climate in Xinjiang. Arid Land Geography, 2005. (2): 199- 203. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6060.2005.02.012
	孙艺杰, 任志远, 赵胜男, 等. 陕西河谷盆地生态系统服务协同与权衡时空差异分析. 地理学报, 2017. 72 (3): 521- 532.
	Sun Y J , Ren Z Y , Zhao S N , et al. Spatial and temporal changing analysis of synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services in valley basins of Shaanxi Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017. 72 (3): 521- 532.
	谭凌照, 范春雨, 范秀华. 吉林蛟河阔叶红松林木本植物物种多样性及群落结构与生产力的关系. 植物生态学报, 2017. 41 (11): 1149- 1156. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0321
	Tan L Z , Fan C Y , Fan X H . Relationships between species diversity or community structure and productivity of woody-plants in a broad-leaved Korean pine forest in Jiaohe, Jilin, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017. 41 (11): 1149- 1156. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0321
	王兵, 杨锋伟, 郭浩, 等. 中华人民共和国林业行业标准《森林生态系统服务功能评估规范》(LY/T 1721-2008). 北京: 中国标准出版社. 2008.
	Wang B , Yang F W , Guo H , et al. Forestry industry standards of the People's Republic of China《Criteria for Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Service Function》(LY/T 1721-2008). Beijing: China Standards Pressm. 2008.
	王兵, 马向前, 郭浩, 等. 中国杉木林的生态系统服务价值评估. 林业科学, 2009. 45 (4): 124- 130. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.04.021
	Wang B , Ma X Q , Guo H , et al. Evaluation of the Chinese fir forest ecosystem services value. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009. 45 (4): 124- 130. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2009.04.021
	王兵, 任晓旭, 胡文. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估. 林业科学, 2011. 47 (2): 145- 153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2011.02.018
	Wang B , Ren X X , Hu W . Assessment of forest ecosystem services value in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011. 47 (2): 145- 153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1126.2011.02.018
	武文欢, 彭建, 刘焱序, 等. 鄂尔多斯市生态系统服务权衡与协同分析. 地理科学进展, 2017. 36 (12): 1571- 1581. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.012
	Wu W H , Peng J , Liu Y X , et al. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos city. Progress in Geography, 2017. 36 (12): 1571- 1581. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.12.012
	张杰, 潘晓玲. 天山北麓山地-绿洲-荒漠生态系统净初级生产力空间分布格局及其季节变化. 干旱区地理, 2010. (1): 78- 85.
	Zhang J , Pan X L . Spatial pattern and seasonal dynamics of net primary productivity in mountain-oasis-desert ecosystem on the north piedmont of Tianshan Mountains in arid north-west China. Arid Land Geography, 2010. (1): 78- 85.
	De Groot S R E , Vanhellemont M , Baetena L , et al. Competition, tree age and size drive the productivity of mixed forests of pedunculate oak, beech and red oak. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018. 430, 609- 617. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.08.050
	Firbank L , Bradbury R B , Mccracken D I , et al. Delivering multiple ecosystem services from Enclosed Farmland in the UK. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2013. 166 (66): 65- 75.
	Huang Y , Chen Y , Castro-Izaguirre N , et al. Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment. Science, 2018. 362 (6410): 80- 83. doi: 10.1126/science.aat6405
	Jopke C , Kreyling J , Maes J , et al. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe:bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecological Indicators, 2015. 49, 46- 52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.037
	Qiu J X , Turner M G . Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. 110 (29): 12149- 12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310539110
	Rodríguez J P , Beard T D Jr , Bennett E M , et al. Tradeoffs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 2006. 11 (1): 709- 723.
	Tallis H , Kareiva P , Marvier M , et al. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. 105 (28): 9457- 9464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705797105
	Van der Plas F , Ratcliffe S , Ruiz-Benito P , et al. Continental mapping of forest ecosystem functions reveals a high but unrealised potential for forest multi-functionality. Ecology letters, 2018. 21 (1): 31- 42. doi: 10.1111/ele.12868
	Wu J G . Landscape sustainability science:ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2013. 28 (6): 999- 1023. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
	Wu S , Li S . Ecosystem service relationships:Formation and recommended approaches from a systematic review. Ecological Indicators, 2019. 99, 1- 11. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.068
	Yang G , Ge Y , Xue H , et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban-rural complexes. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015. 136, 110- 121.

林分特征因子 Forest stand factors	最大值 Maximum value	最小值 Minimum value	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation
平均林龄Average forest age/a	71.00	30.00	48.43	12.94
平均树高Average tree height/m	16.10	3.30	10.50	3.06
平均胸径Average DBH/cm	33.80	9.40	19.40	6.93
郁闭度Canopy density	1.00	0.34	0.57	0.20
蓄积量Standing volume/(m³·hm^-2)	458.86	11.18	188.16	111.44
坡度Slope/(°)	38.00	5.00	22.50	9.17
海拔Altitude/m	2 680.00	1 884.00	2 245.31	240.36
植被盖度Vegetation coverage	0.90	0.01	0.35	0.21
生产力Productivity/(t·hm^-2a^-1)	9.20	0.22	2.65	2.32
涵养水源Water conservation/(t·hm^-2)	11 908.89	3 870.66	5 553.78	1 337.71
固碳释氧Carbon sequestration and oxygen release/(t·hm^-2)	9.42	0.25	3.34	2.25
生物多样性指数Biodiversity index	2.22	0.27	1.23	0.45

林分特征因子 Forest stand factors	生产力 Productivity	涵养水源 Water conservation	固碳释氧 Carbon sequestration and oxygen release	生物多样性 Biodiversity	综合功能 Comprehensive function
平均林龄 Average forest age	0.393^**	0.318^**	0.612^**	0.796^**	0.792^**
平均树高 Average tree height	0.642^**	0.428^**	0.768^**	0.815^**	0.917^**
平均胸径 Average DBH	0.560^**	0.325^**	0.693^**	0.841^**	0.895^**
郁闭度 Canopy closure	0.815^**	0.225^**	0.811^**	0.526^**	0.893^**
蓄积量 Standing volume	0.661^**	0.480^**	0.782^**	0.544^**	0.665^**
坡度 Slope	-0.197^**	0.393^**	0.167^**	0.186^**	0.015
海拔 Altitude	-0.264^**	-0.190^**	-0.042	0.142^**	-0.143^**
植被盖度 Vegetation coverage	-0.146^**	0.237^**	-0.021	0.081^**	0.005

功能 Function	生产力 Productivity	涵养水源 Water conservation	固碳释氧 Carbon sequestration and oxygen release	生物多样性 Biodiversity
生产力 Productivity	1	0.228^**	0.645^**	0.338^**
涵养水源 Water conservation		1	0.512^**	0.449^**
固碳释氧 Carbon sequestration and oxygen release			1	0.651^**
生物多样性 Biodiversity				1

[1]	Qianyong Shen,Mengping Tang. Stem Volume Models of Phyllostachys edulis in Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(5): 89-96.
[2]	Feilong Guo,Gangbiao Xu,Mengzhu Lu,Yihong Meng,Chengzhi Yuan,Kaiqi Guo. Prediction of Potential Suitable Distribution Areas for Populus euphratica Using the MaxEnt Model [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(5): 184-192.
[3]	Ying Guo,Zengyuan Li,Erxue Chen,Xu Zhang,Lei Zhao,Yan Chen,Yahui Wang. A Deep Learning Method for Forest Fine Classification Based on High Resolution Remote Sensing Images: Two-Branch FCN-8s [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(3): 48-60.
[4]	Lü Zhou,Guanglong Ou,Junfeng Wang,Hui Xu. Light Saturation Point Determination and Biomass Remote Sensing Estimation of Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis Forest Based on Spatial Regression Models [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(3): 38-47.
[5]	Xiangqian Wu,Lin Cao,Xin Shen,Guibin Wang,Fuliang Cao. Estimation of Effective Leaf Area Index Using UAV-Based LiDAR in Ginkgo Plantations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(1): 74-86.
[6]	Qianyong Shen,Mengping Tang. Stem Biomass Models of Phyllostachys edulis in Zhejiang Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 181-188.
[7]	Xiao He,Yuancai Lei,Chunquan Xue,Qihu Xu,Haikui Li,Lei Cao. Carbon Density Uncertainty Estimates for Schima superba in Guangdong Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 163-171.
[8]	Guijuan Yang,Haifan Hu,Honggang Sun,Jianguo Zhang,Aiguo Duan. The Influences of Stand Age, Planting Density and Self-Thinning on Relationship between Size Inequality and Periodic Annual Increment in Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata)Plantations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 126-136.
[9]	Yunxia Sun,Zhaogang Liu,Lingbo Dong. Spatial Forest Management Planning Based on Reversion Search Technique of Simulated Annealing Algorithm [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 52-62.
[10]	Yongliang Li,Huaiqing Zhang,Tingdong Yang,Zaiyang Ma,Sijia Li,Kang Shen. A Method of Estimating Chinese Fir Crown Width Based on Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 45-51.
[11]	Chunming Li,Lifang Zhao,Lixue Li. Modeling Stand-Level Mortality of Mongolian Oak(Quercus mongolica)Based on Mixed Effect Model and Zero-Inflated Model Methods [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 27-36.
[12]	Jinchi Wang,Qinglin Huang,Zhibo Ma,Ruchu Huang,Qunrui Zheng. Species Composition and Diversity of Semi-Natural Mixed Forest of Pinus massoniana and Broad-Leaved Trees in Yong'an [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 19-26.
[13]	Weisheng Zeng,Xinyun Chen,Xueyun Yang. Biomass Modeling and Productivity Analysis of Planted Populus spp. in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 1-8.
[14]	You Lei, Ha Denglong, Xie Mingkun, Zhang Xiaopeng, Song Xinyu, Pang Yong, Tang Shouzheng. Stem Volume Calculation Based on Stem Section Profile Curve and Three Dimension Laser Point Cloud [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 63-72.
[15]	Liu Shuai, Li Jianjun, Li Dan, Zhu Kaiwen, Guo Rui, Wen Yijun, Ma Zhenyan. Comparison and Adaptability of Analytical Methods for Spatial Distribution Patterns in Forst [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(11): 73-84.

Analysis on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Multiple Functions of Picea schrenkiana Forests in Central Tianshan Mountains

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 0

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments