破解林业经营小农困境：深化集体林权制度改革下联户经营对营林投入的影响

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240504

林业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (12): 206-218.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240504

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

破解林业经营小农困境：深化集体林权制度改革下联户经营对营林投入的影响

洪燕真^1,^2,*(),王迎静^1,²,詹臣源³,张寒⁴

1. 福建农林大学经济与管理学院　福州 350002
2. 国家林业和草原局集体林业改革发展研究中心　福州 350002
3. 北京林业大学经济管理学院　北京 100083
4. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院　杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2024-08-26 修回日期:2025-01-24 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2026-01-08
通讯作者: 洪燕真 E-mail:hongyanzhen1984@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（72473021, 72073029, 72073107）；国家社会科学基金重大项目（24&ZD108）；第四批林草科技青拔人才项目（2024132017）；福建省社科基金重大项目（FJ2025Z024）。

Resolving the Dilemma of Smallholder Forestry Operation: The Impact of Joint Household Operation on Forest Management Inputs under the Deepening of the Collective Forest Tenure Reform

Yanzhen Hong^1,^2,*(),Yingjing Wang^1,²,Chenyuan Zhan³,Han Zhang⁴

1. School of Economics and Managemnet, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University　Fuzhou 350002
2. Research Center for Collective Forestry Reform and Development, National Forestry and Grassland Administration　Fuzhou 350002
3. School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University　Beijing 100083
4. College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University　Yangling 712100

Received:2024-08-26 Revised:2025-01-24 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2026-01-08
Contact: Yanzhen Hong E-mail:hongyanzhen1984@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探索联户经营模式对营林投入的影响，提升林业经营效率并实现可持续发展，以应对集体林权制度改革背景下单户经营所面临的困境。方法: 基于集体林改监测数据，采用内生转换回归模型，在反事实分析框架下，深入剖析联户经营模式对单位面积资本投入和劳动投入的影响，同时，探讨非农就业对联户经营与营林投入关系的调节效应，并分析农户间的异质性。结果: 1）在反事实分析框架下，联户经营对单位面积资本投入的处理效应为?0.786，对单位面积劳动投入的处理效应为?0.054，联户经营能够显著降低单位面积的资本投入和劳动投入。2）非农就业对联户经营与单位面积资本、劳动投入关系具有显著正向调节效应。3）联户经营减少单位面积的自投劳动和雇佣劳动，特别是自投劳动减少显著。此外，林业社会化服务的提供可有效降低信息不对称，从而缓解机会主义行为。4）异质性分析结果显示，小规模、低收入、小组联户的农户在营林投入减少效应上更为显著。结论: 政府应促进林业生产经营的规模化和专业化，加强非农就业与林业经营的互动，完善林业社会化服务体系，并引导联户经营主体优化利益联结机制，通过差异化策略确保各方利益共享，以推动林业资源的优化配置和经济效益的提升。

关键词: 集体林权制度改革, 联户经营, 资本投入, 劳动投入, 内生转换回归模型

Abstract:

Objective: This study aims to explore how joint household management affects forestry management inputs, for enhancing operational efficiency and achieving sustainable development, so as to address the dilemmas faced by individual household operations under the background of the collective forest tenure reform. Method: Based on the monitoring data of collective forest tenure reform, an endogenous switching regression model was adopted to deeply analyze the impact of joint household management model on capital and labor inputs per unit area within a counterfactual analysis framework. Meanwhile, the moderating effect of non-farm employment on the relationship between joint household management and forest management inputs was explored, and the heterogeneity among farmers was analyzed. Result: 1) Under the counterfactual analysis framework, the treatment effect of joint household management on capital input per unit area is ?0.786, and the treatment effect on labor input per unit area is ?0.054, indicating that joint household management can significantly reduce both capital input and labor input per unit area. 2) Non-farm employment positively moderates the relationship between joint household management and capital/labor input per unit area. 3) Joint household management reduces both self-invested labor and hired labor per unit area, with a particularly notable decrease in self-invested labor. In addition, the provision of socialized forestry services effectively alleviates information asymmetry, thereby alleviating opportunistic behaviors. 4) The results of heterogeneity analysis show that farmers with small-scale operations, low incomes, and small-group joint households have more significant reduction effects in forest management input. Conclusion: The government should promote the scaling-up and specialization of forestry production and management, strengthen the interaction between non-farm employment and forestry management, improve the forestry socialization service system, and guide joint household management entities to optimize the interest connection mechanisms. Through differentiated strategies, the government should ensure the shared interests of all parties to promote the optimal allocation of forestry resources and the improvement of economic benefits.

Key words: collective forest tenure reform, joint household operation, capital input, labor input, endogenous switching regression model

中图分类号:

S7-9
F307.2

洪燕真,王迎静,詹臣源,张寒. 破解林业经营小农困境：深化集体林权制度改革下联户经营对营林投入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(12): 206-218.

Yanzhen Hong,Yingjing Wang,Chenyuan Zhan,Han Zhang. Resolving the Dilemma of Smallholder Forestry Operation: The Impact of Joint Household Operation on Forest Management Inputs under the Deepening of the Collective Forest Tenure Reform[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(12): 206-218.

图/表 12

表1

表2

样本的描述性统计①"

变量名称 Variable name	变量赋值及单位 Variable assignment & unit	总样本 Total sample	联户经营均值 Mean value for joint household operation	未联户经营均值 Mean value for non-joint household operation	差异 Difference
因变量Dependent variables
资本投入 Capital input	单位面积的资本投入，取对数 Capital input per unit area/（yuan·hm^?2）, logarithm is taken	4.05	3.53	4.20	?0.67^***
劳动投入 Labor input	单位面积的劳动投入，取对数 Labor input per unit area/(yuan·hm^?2), logarithm is taken	5.81	5.31	5.96	?0.65^***
自变量Independent variables
联户经营 Joint household operation	1: 联户经营，0: 未联户经营 1 for joint household operation, 0 for non-joint household operation	0.23	1.00	0.00	1.00
控制变量Control variables
户主年龄 Age of household head	调查当年户主年龄 Age of household head in the survey year/a	51.79	51.01	52.02	?1.01^**
户主性别 Gender of household head	1: 男性，0: 女性 1 for male, 0 for female	0.95	0.96	0.95	0.01
户主职业 Occupation of household head	1: 农业，2: 兼业，3: 非农 1 for agriculture, 2 for part-time agriculture, 3 for non-agriculture	1.63	1.68	1.62	0.06^**
户主是否村干部 Whether the household head is a village cadre	1: 是，0: 否 1 for yes, 0 for no	0.37	0.41	0.36	0.06^***
家庭人口数量 Number of family members	家庭人口总数 Total number of family members	4.69	4.60	4.72	?0.12^*
家庭总收入 Total household income	家庭总收入，取对数 Total household income/yuan， logarithm is taken	10.26	10.39	10.22	0.17^***
距离县城距离 Distance from county town	住址到最近县城的距离 Distance from residence to nearest county town/km	19.96	20.02	19.89	0.31
林地地块数量 Number of forestland plots	家庭拥有的林地地块数量 Number of forestland plots owned by the family	2.77	3.25	2.64	0.61^***
林地细碎化程度 Degree of forestland fragmentation	农户家庭林地总面积/林地地块数量 Total forestland area of the family (hm²)/number of forestland plots	2.07	4.29	1.42	2.88^***
是否有生态公益林 Presence of ecological public welfare forest	1: 是，0: 否 1 for yes, 0 for no	0.19	0.23	0.18	0.05^***
林地平均经营期限Average operation period of forestland	农户家庭林地总期限/家庭拥有的林地块数 Total forestland operation period of the family/number of forestland plots	54.69	50.26	55.96	?5.70^***
工具变量Instrumental variables
联户经营率 Rate of joint household operation	除自身以外乡镇内联户经营的比例 Proportion of joint household operation within the township excluding oneself (%)	0.23	0.32	0.21	0.11^***

表2

表3

农户联户经营参与决策模型与营林投入模型联立估计结果"

变量 Variable	选择方程 Selection equation	结果方程（资本投入） Result equation (capital input)		选择方程 Selection equation	结果方程（劳动投入） Result equation (labor input)
	是否联户经营 Whether it is a joint household operation	联户经营 Joint household operation	未联户经营 Non-joint household operation	是否联户经营 Whether it is a joint household operation	联户经营 Joint household operation	未联户经营 Non-joint household operation
	（1）	（2）	（3）	（4）	（5）	（6）
户主年龄	?0.004^** (0.002)	?0.030^***	?0.038^***	?0.001	?0.020^**	?0.026^***
Age of household head	?0.004^** (0.002)	(0.011)	(0.006)	(0.002)	(0.010)	(0.005)
户主性别	0.111	?1.109^**	0.538^*	0.090	?0.244	0.534^**
Gender of household head	(0.089)	(0.523)	(0.319)	(0.109)	(0.481)	(0.264)
户主职业	?0.006	?0.546^***	?0.273^***	0.035	?0.396^***	?0.502^***
Occupation of household head	(0.026)	(0.142)	(0.095)	(0.031)	(0.130)	(0.079)
户主是否村干部	0.184^*** (0.039)	0.608^*** (0.221)	0.395^*** (0.145)	0.123^*** (0.047)	0.379^* (0.194)	0.588^*** (0.123)
Whether the household head is a village cadre	0.184^*** (0.039)	0.608^*** (0.221)	0.395^*** (0.145)	0.123^*** (0.047)	0.379^* (0.194)	0.588^*** (0.123)
家庭人口数量	?0.016	?0.052	0.010	?0.025^*	?0.108^*	0.061^*
Number of family members	(0.011)	(0.062)	(0.038)	(0.013)	(0.057)	(0.032)
家庭总收入	0.042^***	0.499^***	0.319^***	0.031^**	0.371^***	0.307^***
Total household income	(0.012)	(0.073)	(0.043)	(0.015)	(0.066)	(0.036)
距县城距离	0.009^***	0.013	0.018^***	0.002	0.039^***	0.026^***
Distance from county town	(0.002)	(0.009)	(0.006)	(0.002)	(0.008)	(0.005)
林地地块数量	0.118^***	0.308^***	0.399^***	0.087^***	0.197^***	0.297^***
Number of forestland plots	(0.010)	(0.073)	(0.039)	(0.012)	(0.054)	(0.039)
林地细碎化程度	0.013^***	?0.001	0.033^***	0.016^***	?0.011^**	?0.032^***
Degree of forestland fragmentation	(0.002)	(0.006)	(0.011)	(0.003)	(0.005)	(0.012)
是否有生态公益林	0.067	?0.784^***	?0.443^**	0.242^***	?0.410^*	?0.962^***
Presence of ecological public welfare forest	(0.049)	(0.246)	(0.181)	(0.056)	(0.226)	(0.158)
林地平均经营期限	?0.005^***	?0.012^*	?0.002	?0.007^***	?0.009	0.022^***
Average operation period of forestland	(0.001)	(0.006)	(0.003)	(0.001)	(0.006)	(0.003)
联户经营率	1.030^***			2.235^***
Rate of joint household operation	(0.087)			(0.133)
常数项	?1.659^***	?0.130	2.865^***	?1.693^***	2.686^**	1.547^**
Constant	(0.202)	(1.453)	(0.719)	(0.249)	(1.150)	(0.607)
ρ₁		0.398^**			1.067^***
ρ₁		(0.165)			(0.023)
ρ₀			2.149^***			1.206^***
ρ₀			(0.068)			(0.013)
方程独立性检验 LR test of independence test	195.39^***			158.81^***
模型拟合优度检验 Goodness-of-fit test for model	297.06^***			440.98^***
对数伪似然值 Log pseudolikelihood value	?13 497.256			?13 428.409
样本量Sample size	4 379	990	3 389	4 379	990	3 389

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

表8

表9

表10

表11

表12

参考文献 0

	程娟娟, 许时蕾, 刘　晶, 等. 林地细碎化变动对农户营林积极性的处理效应分析: 基于内生性视角的倾向值匹配估计. 林业经济, 2019, 41 (2): 106- 112.
	Cheng J J, Xu S L, Liu J, et al. Analysis on the effect of forestland fragmentation changes on farmer’s forest management incentives: based on endogenous perspective with propensity score matching approach. Forestry Economics, 2019, 41 (2): 106- 112.
	韩雅清, 林丽梅, 魏远竹, 等. 劳动力转移、合作经营与林业生产效率研究. 资源科学, 2018, 40 (4): 838- 850.
	Han Y Q, Lin L M, Wei Y Z, et al. Labor transfer, cooperative operation and forestry production efficiency based on surveys of farmers in 9 forestry counties in Fujian. Resources Science, 2018, 40 (4): 838- 850.
	黄建兴, 刘金龙. 深化集体林权制度改革的实践与理论探索. 南宁师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 45 (6): 1- 22.
	Huang J X, Liu J L. Practical and theoretical exploration of deepening the reform of collective forest tenure system. Journal of Nanning Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 45 (6): 1- 22.
	江永红, 杨　春. 2024. 加入合作社能否改善中国小农户市场弱势地位? 农村经济 (4): 121-131.
	Jiang Y H, Yang C. 2024. Can joining cooperatives improve the weak market position of small farmers in China? Rural Economy, (4): 121-131. ［in Chinese］
	李寒滇, 余文梦, 苏时鹏. 福建家庭林业单户与联户经营的效率差异分析: 以福建省5地市272户农户数据为例. 资源开发与市场, 2018, 34 (2): 230- 235.
	Li H D, Yu W M, Su S P. Analysis on different efficiency individual forest management and collective forest management in Fujian Province: taking 5 cities and 272 peasant households as an example in Fujian Province. Resource Development & Market, 2018, 34 (2): 230- 235.
	李　静, 陈　钦. 基于可持续生计资本理论的农户林地经营方式选择. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 47 (2): 77- 86.
	Li J, Chen Q. Research on farmers’ choice of forestland management mode based on theory of sustainable livelihood capital. Journal of Shenyang Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2023, 47 (2): 77- 86.
	李婷婷, 兰　岚, 苏时鹏. 福建两种典型林改模式的农户获得感比较. 资源开发与市场, 2017, 33 (5): 524- 528.
	Li T T, Lan L, Su S P. Comparative analysis of acquisition sense of farmers under policy of two typical modes of forest right reform in Fujian. Resource Development & Market, 2017, 33 (5): 524- 528.
	李　艳, 刘　璨, 杨红强, 等. 资本异质性视角下林业投入劳动集约的成因分析: 基于9省区林农数据的联立方程MV Tobit估计. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (10): 99- 110.
	Li Y, Liu C, Yang H Q, et al. Causes for labor intensives on forestland inputs from the perspective of capital heterogeneities: a simultaneous-equation MV Tobit estimation based on households data from 9 provinces. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (10): 99- 110.
	刘　璨, 刘　浩, 贺胜年. 中国集体林产权制度改革主要政策问题研究. 林业经济, 2011, 33 (8): 8- 19.
	Liu C, Liu H, He S N. The key issues on reform of collective forestland tenure in China. Forestry Economics, 2011, 33 (8): 8- 19.
	刘　璨, 张　寒. 集体林权制度改革进程、效应与演化: 2002—2022年. 改革, 2023 (8): 140- 155.
	Liu C, Zhang H. The course, effects, and evolution of the reform of collective forest rights system: 2002—2022. Reform, 2023 (8): 140- 155.
	刘　浩, 王雁斌, 刘　璨. 林地细碎化、产权激励对林业生产要素配置的影响. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38 (7): 1771- 1783. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230709
	Liu H, Wang Y B, Liu C. The effect of forestland fragmentation and tenure incentive on the allocation of forest production input. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38 (7): 1771- 1783. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230709
	卢素兰, 丛海龙, 钟海霞. 非农就业对农户经济林经营行为的影响. 林业经济问题, 2024, 44 (1): 68- 79.
	Lu S L, Cong H L, Zhong H X. The effect of non-agricultural employment on farmers’ economic forest management behaviors. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2024, 44 (1): 68- 79.
	马　橙, 高建中. 非农就业、经营模式与林业生产效率. 林业经济问题, 2021, 41 (1): 83- 90.
	Ma C, Gao J Z. Non-agricultural employment, business model and forestry production efficiency. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2021, 41 (1): 83- 90.
	潘　丹, 陆　雨, 孔凡斌. 退耕程度高低和时间早晚对农户收入的影响: 基于多项内生转换模型的实证分析. 农业技术经济, 2022 (6): 19- 32.
	Pan D, Lu Y, Kong F B. The impact of participation degree and time of returning farmland to forest on farmer’s household income: empirical analysis based on a multiple endogenous regression model. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2022 (6): 19- 32.
	裘　菊, 孙　妍, 李　凌, 等. 林权改革对林地经营模式影响分析: 福建林权改革调查报告. 林业经济, 2007, 29 (1): 23- 27.
	Qiu J, Sun Y, Li L, et al. Impact of tenure reform on forest management model: the case of Fujian Province. Forestry Economics, 2007, 29 (1): 23- 27.
	申津羽, 侯一蕾, 吴　静, 等. 农户选择林业不同经营形式的意愿及影响因素分析: 基于福建省三明市的实证研究. 林业科学, 2014, 50 (11): 138- 146.
	Shen J Y, Hou Y L, Wu J, et al. Factors affecting households' intentions in choosing different forest management models: a case study in Sanming, Fujian. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50 (11): 138- 146.
	魏　建, 尹少华, 刘　璨. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对兼业与非兼业农户收入的影响研究. 林业经济, 2018, 40 (12): 64- 71.
	Wei J, Yin S H, Liu C. Research on the impact of the new collective forestland tenure reform on the income of part-time and non-part-time households. Forestry Economics, 2018, 40 (12): 64- 71.
	温映雪, 刘伟平. 要素市场发育对农户家庭林业经营投入的影响: 基于福建省605位农户调查数据的实证研究. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2023 (1): 99- 109.
	Wen Y X, Liu W P. Influence of factor market development on farmers’ household forestry management input: an empirical study based on the survey data of 605 farmers in Fujian Province. Fujian Tribune, 2023 (1): 99- 109.
	温映雪, 宁满秀, 刘伟平. 2022. 林地确权真的全面提高了农户营造林积极性吗? 农业技术经济, (3): 38−48.
	Wen Y X, Ning M X, Liu W P. 2022. Are rural households’ incentives on forest management actually motivated by the forest land tenure reform in an all-round way? Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, (3): 38-48. ［in Chinese］
	肖文发, 朱建华, 曾立雄, 等. 森林碳汇助力碳中和的几点认识. 林业科学, 2023, 59 (3): 1- 11. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220681
	Xiao W F, Zhu J H, Zeng L X, et al. Several perspectives on forest carbon sink for promoting carbon neutrality. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59 (3): 1- 11. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220681
	谢芳婷, 朱述斌, 康小兰, 等. 集体林地不同经营模式对林地经营投入的影响: 以江西省为例. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (6): 122- 132.
	Xie F T, Zhu S B, Kang X L, et al. Impact of various collective forest management modes on forestry investment: a case study of Jiangxi Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (6): 122- 132.
	徐晋涛, 孙　妍, 姜雪梅, 等. 我国集体林区林权制度改革模式和绩效分析. 林业经济, 2008, 30 (9): 27- 38.
	Xu J T, Sun Y, Jiang X M, et al. Collective forest tenure reform in China: analysis of pattern and performance. Forestry Economics, 2008, 30 (9): 27- 38.
	杨　超, 宋维明. 林权改革条件的林农选择: 营林行为与营林规模. 改革, 2015 (11): 77- 85.
	Yang C, Song W M. Farmers’ choice in the forest tenure reform: silviculture and scale. Reform, 2015 (11): 77- 85.
	银小柯, 陈国兴, 王文烂. 交易费用视角下林业联户经营形成机理分析. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, 15 (1): 46- 49, 72.
	Yin X K, Chen G X, Wang W L. Analysis on the formation mechanism of the forestry joint household operations from the perspective of transaction costs. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2012, 15 (1): 46- 49, 72.
	银小柯, 王文烂. 集体行动的逻辑视角下林业联户经营投入激励分析. 林业经济问题, 2011, 31 (5): 406- 410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2011.05.007
	Yin X K, Wang W L. Analysis on excitation of operation investment of forestry joint household from the perspective of collective action. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2011, 31 (5): 406- 410. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2011.05.007
	俞　剑, 李　扬, 温亚利, 等. 林改背景下农户家庭林业经营投入的影响因素分析: 基于7省3 500户样本农户调查. 林业经济, 2017, 39 (7): 27- 31.
	Yu J, Li Y, Wen Y L, et al. Analysis on factors influencing households’ investment in their forestland under the background of forestry tenure reform: a study based on investigation of 3 500 households in 7 provinces. Forestry Economics, 2017, 39 (7): 27- 31.
	赵思嘉, 朱　臻, 余　康, 等. 非农就业对不同规模林农营林决策行为和效益影响的异质性讨论: 一个文献述评与分析框架. 农林经济管理学报, 2018, 17 (4): 434- 444.
	Zhao S J, Zhu Z, Yu K, et al. Impact of off-farming employment on heterogeneities for rural households’ forest management behaviors and values with different sizes: a literature review and analytical framework. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2018, 17 (4): 434- 444.
	赵西倩. 2024. 集体林权制度改革对森林质量的影响研究: 以浙江省为例. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
	Zhao X Q. 2024. Study on the impact of collective forestownership system reform on forest quality: a case study of Zhejiang Province. Yangling: Northwest A&F University. ［in Chinese］
	郑旭媛, 林庆林, 周凌晨诺. 中国农业“双规模”经营方式创新、绩效及其外溢效应分析. 中国农村经济, 2022 (7): 103- 123.
	Zheng X Y, Lin Q L, Zhou-Ling C N. Analysis of innovation, performance, and spillover effects of China's agricultural“dual-scale”operation mode. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022 (7): 103- 123.
	周　雪, 董芮彤, 秦昌胜, 等. 青藏高原草地联户经营对牧民非农就业与收入的影响: 基于青海与甘肃牧区调查数据的实证分析. 草业科学, 2021, 38 (12): 2524- 2535.
	Zhou X, Dong R T, Qin C S, et al. The impact of multi-household rangeland operation on non-agricultural employment and household income in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: an empirical analysis based on Qinghai and Gansu survey data. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38 (12): 2524- 2535.
	朱乾宇, 龙　艳, 钟　真. “三位一体”: 从单一合作到综合合作的制度创新——基于三个案例的比较分析. 农业经济问题, 2021, 42 (6): 19- 33.
	Zhu Q Y, Long Y, Zhong Z. “Trinity”: institutional innovation from single cooperation to comprehensive cooperation: comparative analysis based on three cases. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2021, 42 (6): 19- 33.
	朱　臻, 薛家依, 宁　可. 规模化经营背景下劳动监督对营林质量的影响研究: 来自南方集体林区三省规模户的实证数据. 农林经济管理学报, 2021, 20 (1): 78- 91.
	Zhu Z, Xue J Y, Ning K. How labor supervision impacts quality of forest management based on large-scale forest management: evidences from large-scale foresters in 3 provinces of the southern collective forest area. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2021, 20 (1): 78- 91.
	Chimi P M, Mala W A, Essouma F M, et al. Farm typology and structure of farmer decision making: the case of the production basin of the forest-savannah transition zone, centre Cameroon region. Land Use Policy, 2023, 134, 106908. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106908
	Duffy M. Economies of size in production agriculture. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 2009, 4 (3/4): 375- 392.
	Maddala G S. 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Zhu Z, Xu Z G, Shen Y Q, et al. How off-farm work drives the intensity of rural households' investment in forest management: the case from Zhejiang, China. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, 98, 30- 43. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.006

变量 Variable	联户经营Joint household operation 第一阶段First stage	资本投入Capital input 第二阶段Second stage	劳动投入Labor input 第二阶段Second stage
联户经营Joint household operation		?1.668^***(0.477)	?0.727^***(0.453)
联户经营率Rate of joint household operation	0.650^***(0.036)
控制变量Control variables	已控制Controlled	已控制Controlled	已控制Controlled
Kleibergen-Paap rk LM	220.064^***
Cragg-Donald Wald F	333.911
样本量Sample size	4 379	4 379	4 379
R²	0.120	0.076	0.111

组别 Group		决策阶段 Decision-making stage		ATT	ATU
组别 Group		联户经营 Joint household operation	未联户经营 Non-joint household operation	ATT	ATU
资本投入 Capital input	联户经营	3.530	4.316	?0.786^***
	Joint household operation	(0.032)	(0.026)	(0.041)
	未联户经营	2.228	4.198		?1.970^***
	Non-joint household operation	(0.021)	(0.014)		(0.025)

组别 Group		决策阶段 Decision-making stage		ATT	ATU
组别 Group		联户经营 Joint household operation	未联户经营 Non-joint household operation	ATT	ATU
劳动投入 Labor input	联户经营	5.357	5.410	?0.054^***
	Joint household operation	(0.030)	(0.038)	(0.049)
	未联户经营	4.894	5.954		?1.060^***
	Non-joint household operation	(0.018)	(0.021)		(0.028)

变量 Variable	（1）	（2）
变量 Variable	资本投入 Capital input	劳动投入 Labor input
联户经营	?0.750^***	?0.742^***
Joint household operation	(0.125)	(0.120)
非农就业	?0.109^***	?0.134^***
Off-farming	(0.021)	(0.020)
联户经营×非农就业	0.067^*	0.068^*
Joint household operation× off-farming	(0.038)	(0.037)
控制变量 Control variables	已控制 Controlled	已控制 Controlled
R²	0.093	0.120
样本量Sample size	4 379	4 379

组别 Group		决策阶段Decision-making stage		ATT
组别 Group		合作经营 Joint operation	未合作经营 Non joint operation	ATT
自投劳动 Self-invested labor	合作经营	1.181	6.260	?5.079^***
自投劳动 Self-invested labor	Joint operation	(0.085)	(0.106)	(0.136)
雇佣劳动 Hired Labor	合作经营	0.426	0.915	?0.489^***
雇佣劳动 Hired Labor	Joint operation	(0.031)	(0.021)	(0.037)

破解林业经营小农困境：深化集体林权制度改革下联户经营对营林投入的影响

Resolving the Dilemma of Smallholder Forestry Operation: The Impact of Joint Household Operation on Forest Management Inputs under the Deepening of the Collective Forest Tenure Reform

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 0

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

期刊获奖

引证指标

联系方式

变量 Variable	林业社会化服务的种类数量 The variety and quantity of forestry socialization services provided during cooperation						合计Total
变量 Variable	无None	1种One	2种Two	3种Three	4种Four	5种及以上 Five or more	合计Total
合作经营主体数量 Number of joint household management entities	14	44	16	6	3	2	85
占比Proportion (%)	16.47	51.76	18.82	7.06	3.53	2.35	100.00

组别 Group	林地规模 Forestland scale		家庭收入 Household income		联户类型 Type of joint household
组别 Group	低于均值 Below the mean	高于均值 Above the mean	低于均值 Below the mean	高于均值 Above the mean	村集体联户 Village collective joint household	小组联户 Group joint household	其他联户 Other joint household
资本投入 Capital input	?0.909^***	?0.575^***	?1.049^***	?0.588^***	?0.579^***	?0.883^***	?0.747^***
资本投入 Capital input	(0.037)	(0.048)	(0.045)	(0.037)	(0115)	(0.050)	(0.040)
劳动投入 Labor input	?0.219^***	?0.095^**	?0.197^***	?0.033^***	?0.074^***	?0.191^***	?0.094^***
劳动投入 Labor input	(0.026)	(0.049)	(0.036）	(0.014)	(0.032)	(0.039)	(0.036)

[1]	魏建,戴永务,刘璨. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对农户经济福利的作用机制与影响测度[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 195-210.
[2]	施正煌,侯方淼,张浩昆,黄国星. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对中国木质林产品出口边际增长的影响分析[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 211-222.
[3]	谢芳婷,施建玲,朱臻,沈月琴. 林地产权安全对林农非木质林产品经营投入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 204-218.
[4]	陈幸良,窦亚权. 林下经济高质量发展：战略要义、技术突破与关键举措[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(7): 59-71.
[5]	刘浩,张连刚,刘璨. 基于产权叠加效应视角的农户林业生产投入[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(10): 211-220.
[6]	许毓坤,薛泽茜,庄伟卿,宋立,黄安胜. 新一轮集体林权制度改革成效、乡镇林业站职能效率和农户增收——基于面板向量自回归模型的实证分析[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(10): 236-246.
[7]	程钰,刘璨,杨红强,张寒. 商品林种植结构的“趋经济林化”——基于劳动力成本效应及相对收益效应的成因分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 184-193.
[8]	赵晓迪, 李凌超, 杨文涛, 程宝栋, 刘金龙. 福建省县域森林转型社会经济影响因素分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 147-156.
[9]	赵静, 李婷婷, 申津羽, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革绩效评价及其对林农森林经营意愿影响分析——基于福建省永安市的农户调查数据[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 138-146.
[10]	申津羽, 侯一蕾, 吴静, 温亚利. 农户选择林业不同经营形式的意愿及影响因素分析——基于福建省三明市的实证研究[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(11): 138-146.
[11]	王小军, 谢屹, 王立群, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革中的农户森林经营行为与影响因素——以福建省邵武市和尤溪县为例[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 135-142.
[12]	苏时鹏;马梅芸;林群. 集体林权制度改革后农户林业全要素生产率的变动——基于福建农户的跟踪调查[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(6): 127-135.
[13]	孔凡斌;廖文梅. 集体林分权条件下的林地细碎化程度及与农户林地投入产出的关系——基于江西省8县602户农户调查数据的分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(4): 119-126.
[14]	孔凡斌;. 集体林权制度改革对林区县乡财政性收入影响评价——基于江西省赣州市的调查[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(9): 120-129.
[15]	王文烂. 集体林权制度改革对农民林业收入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2009, 12(8): 141-146.