林业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 211-222.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20240475
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2024-08-06
出版日期:
2025-09-25
发布日期:
2025-10-10
通讯作者:
侯方淼
E-mail:houfangmiao@bjfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Zhenghuang Shi1,fangmiao Hou1,*(),Haokun Zhang1,Guoxing Huang2
Received:
2024-08-06
Online:
2025-09-25
Published:
2025-10-10
Contact:
fangmiao Hou
E-mail:houfangmiao@bjfu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 探究新一轮集体林权制度改革(简称“新林改”)对中国木质林产品出口边际增长的作用机制,为深化集体林权改革和推动林产品贸易高质量发展提供科学依据。方法: 基于2000—2022年中国海关和联合国商贸数据库的6位码双边数据,采用三元边际分解方法分析木质林产品出口增长,构建年份—省份—目的国三维面板数据结构。以新林改作为准自然试验,以制造业为对照组,应用双重机器学习模型分析新林改对木质林产品出口边际增长的影响。结果: 1) 国产材供给增长会对进口材形成替代效应,且进口材的需求弹性明显高于国内木材。2) 新林改通过产权激励和配套改革激励,对木质林产品出口份额、广度边际和数量边际具有显著正向影响,对价格边际具有显著负向影响。3) 新林改通过增加国内木材供给,并通过国产材替代进口材的渠道,可推动出口边际增长。4) 在异质性方面,新林改对资本技术密集型木质林产品出口边际增长的促进效应高于劳动密集型产品,且对南方林区的影响程度大于非南方林区。结论: 新林改对林业产业具有显著激励作用,可有效推动木质林产品出口边际增长,减少对外部木材资源的依赖,增强国家木材安全。未来应加强政府顶层设计,依托新林改统筹自然资源管理、产业政策和贸易政策,进一步推动林业高质量发展。
中图分类号:
施正煌,侯方淼,张浩昆,黄国星. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对中国木质林产品出口边际增长的影响分析[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 211-222.
Zhenghuang Shi,fangmiao Hou,Haokun Zhang,Guoxing Huang. Analysis of the Impact of the New Round of Collective Forest Tenure Reform on the Growth of Export Margins of China’s Wood-Based Forest Product[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(9): 211-222.
表1
描述性统计"
变量Variable | 样本量 Sample size | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. |
新林改New forest reform | 119 341 | 0.366 | 0.482 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
确权率Confirmation rate | 31 517 | 90.717 | 16.052 | 4.717 | 100 |
份额Share | 119 341 | 0.006 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.640 |
广度边际Extensive margin | 119 341 | 0.200 | 0.170 | 0.000 | 0.987 |
数量边际Quantity margin | 119 341 | 0.018 | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.999 |
价格边际Price margin | 119 341 | 3.612 | 10.736 | 0.010 | 1 307.016 |
进口国GDP Importing country’s GDP/108 $ | 119 341 | 5 794.448 | 19 320.35 | 1.040 | 257 000.000 |
进口国人口Importing country’s population/104 people | 119 341 | 4 806.440 | 13 306.160 | 1.779 | 142 862.766 |
进口国对外开放度Importing country’s openness (%) | 119 341 | 66.896 | 40.611 | 11.147 | 420.682 |
进口国森林覆盖率Importing country’s forest coverage rate (%) | 119 341 | 31.806 | 22.660 | 0.008 | 98.313 |
进口国汇率Exchange rate | 119 341 | 172.430 | 1 183.379 | 0.007 | 42 000.000 |
省份GDP Province’s GDP/108 yuan | 119 341 | 26 350.560 | 23 626.200 | 139.200 | |
省份对外开放度 Province’s openness (%) | 119 341 | 41.620 | 38.941 | 0.008 | 160.995 |
省份林业(制造业)产值 Province’s forestry (no forestry) output value/108 yuan | 119 341 | 9 090.725 | 8 747.622 | 6.960 | 48 593.600 |
省份公路里程Province’s highway mileage/km | 119 341 | 13.948 | 8.386 | 0.610 | 39.890 |
省份人口Province’s population/104 people | 119 341 | 5 226.525 | 2 877.615 | 264.000 | 12 684.000 |
国产材产量Domestic timber production/104 m3 | 111 826 | 290.380 | 435.575 | 0.040 | 3 602.000 |
进口材数量External wood import volume/104 m3 | 111 454 | 192.959 | 252.759 | 0.000 | 1 324.584 |
国产材平均价格Average price of domestic timber/ (yuan·m?3) | 97 049 | 708.669 | 198.614 | 9.000 | 1 500.000 |
进口材平均价格Average price of foreign timber/108 yuan | 109 002 | 1 583.403 | 1 165.242 | 318.786 | 9 996.251 |
林业投资额Forestry investment/108 yuan | 115 068 | 0.534 | 0.785 | 0.000 | 8.046 |
木材需求量Wood demand/104 m3 | 118 324 | 453.734 | 485.558 | 0.060 | 3 666.118 |
进口材依赖程度Degree of dependence on external wood resources | 118 324 | 0.377 | 0.357 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
表2
基准回归结果①"
变量 Variable | 国产材产量 Domestic timber production | 进口材数量 Import timber quantity | 未加入控制变量二次方 Without inclusion of squared terms of control variables | 加入控制变量二次方 With inclusion of squared terms of control variables | |||||||
份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | 份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | ||||
进口材价格 Import timber price | 0.026*** | ?1.511*** | |||||||||
(0.002) | (0.008) | ||||||||||
国内木材价格 Domestic timber price | ?0.130*** | 0.434*** | |||||||||
(0.004) | (0.021) | ||||||||||
新林改 New forest reform | 0.233*** | 0.123*** | 0.155*** | ?0.041*** | 0.220*** | 0.133*** | 0.134*** | ?0.040*** | |||
(0.021) | (0.013) | (0.024) | (0.015) | (0.021) | (0.013) | (0.024) | (0.015) | ||||
控制变量 Control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
年份固定Year fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
省份固定 Province fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
国家固定Country fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
样本量Sample size | 90 547 | 90 611 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 |
表3
稳健性检验结果(重设回归模型)①"
变量 Variable | 重设分割比例Reset the segmentation ratio | 多维固定效应模型Multidimensional fixed effects model | |||||||
份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | 份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | ||
新林改 New forest reform | 0.220*** | 0.133*** | 0.135*** | ?0.041*** | 0.232*** | 0.136*** | 0.132*** | ?0.036** | |
(0.021) | (0.013) | (0.024) | (0.015) | (0.022) | (0.013) | (0.024) | (0.014) | ||
控制变量Control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
控制变量二次方 Squared terms of control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
年份固定Year fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
省份固定Province fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
国家固定Country fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
样本量Sample size | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 | 119 341 |
表4
稳健性检验结果(调整研究样本与更换被解释变量)①"
变量 Variable | 调整研究样本Adjustment of research samples | 更换被解释变量Replacement of the explained variable | |||||||
份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | 份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | ||
新林改 New forest reform | 0.171*** | 0.099*** | 0.115*** | ?0.050*** | |||||
(0.021) | (0.013) | (0.025) | (0.015) | ||||||
确权率Confirmation rate | 0.308*** | 0.061** | 0.216*** | ?0.038** | |||||
(0.022) | (0.013) | (0.028) | (0.016) | ||||||
控制变量Control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
控制变量二次方 Squared terms of control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
年份固定Year fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
省份固定Province fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
国家固Country fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
样本量Sample size |
表5
机制检验结果①"
变量 Variable | 林业投资额 Forestry investment | 国产材产量 Domestic timber production | 进口材依赖程度 Degree of dependence on external wood resources |
新林改 New forest reform | 0.039*** | 0.270*** | ?0.104*** |
(0.009) | (0.007) | (0.002) | |
控制变量 Control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes |
控制变量二次方Squared terms of control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes |
年份固定Year fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes |
省份固定Province fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes |
国家固定Country fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes |
样本量Sample size | 115 068 | 110 826 | 118 324 |
表6
按林区划分异质性检验①"
变量 Variable | 南方林区Southern forest region | 非南方林区Non-southern forest region | |||||||
份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | 份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | ||
新林改 New forest reform | 0.265*** | 0.127*** | 0.165*** | ?0.046** | 0.178*** | 0.155*** | 0.039 | ?0.158 | |
(0.038) | (0.023) | (0.041) | (0.020) | (0.027) | (0.015) | (0.023) | (0.037) | ||
控制变量一次项 Control variables a term | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
控制变量二次方 Squared terms of control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
年份固定Year fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
省份固定Province fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
国家固定Country fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
样本量Sample size | 45 595 | 45 595 | 45 595 | 45 595 | 73 746 | 73 746 | 73 746 | 73 746 |
表7
按产品类别划分异质性检验①"
变量 Variable | 劳动密集型Labor-intensive | 资本技术密集型Capital and technology-intensive | |||||||
份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | 份额 Share | 广度边际 Extensive margin | 数量边际 Quantity margin | 价格边际 Price margin | ||
新林改 New forest reform | 0.134*** | 0.130*** | 0.118*** | ?0.070*** | 0.209*** | 0.160*** | 0.194*** | ?0.121*** | |
(0.020) | (0.015) | (0.028) | (0.020) | (0.026) | (0.014) | (0.024) | (0.011) | ||
控制变量一次项 Control variables a term | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
控制变量二次方 Squared terms of control variables | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
年份固定Year fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
省份固定Province fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
国家固定Country fixed | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | 是Yes | |
样本量Sample size | 104 025 | 104 025 | 104 025 | 104 025 | 113 119 | 113 119 | 113 119 | 113 119 |
戴永务, 刘燕娜, 余建辉. 中美木质林产品产业内贸易的实证研究: 基于1992—2009年的进出口贸易数据. 技术经济, 2011, 30 (6): 85- 91.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2011.06.018 |
|
Dai Y W, Liu Y N, Yu J H. Empirical study on Sino-US intra-industry trade in wood forest product: based on statistics of import and export during 1992—2009. Technology Economics, 2011, 30 (6): 85- 91.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2011.06.018 |
|
何文剑, 赵秋雅, 张红霄. 林权改革的增收效应: 机制讨论与经验证据. 中国农村经济, 2021, (3): 46- 67. | |
He W J, Zhao Q Y, Zhang H X. Income-increasing effect of the collective forest tenure reform: mechanism discussions and empirical evidences. Chinese Rural Economy, 2021, (3): 46- 67. | |
侯方淼, 李浩爽. 全球价值链下中国木材产业参与国际分工及其影响因素. 林业经济, 2020, 42 (5): 3- 18. | |
Hou F M, Li H S. Factors influencing China’s timber industry’s participation into the division of global value chain. Forestry Economics, 2020, 42 (5): 3- 18. | |
侯方淼, 成诗怡, 王冰昕, 等. 产业集聚对中国木材产业出口技术复杂度的影响测度与分析. 林业经济, 2023a, 45 (10): 5- 23. | |
Hou F M, Cheng S Y, Wang B X, et al. Measurement and analysis of the impact of industrial agglomeration on the export technical complexity of China’s timber industry. Forestry Economics, 2023a, 45 (10): 5- 23. | |
侯方淼, 王宏飞, 刘 璨, 等. 产业集聚对中国木材企业全球价值链地位的作用机制及其实现路径. 林业科学, 2023b, 59 (12): 137- 151. | |
Hou F M, Wang H F, Liu C, et al. Mechanism of industrial agglomeration on Chinese wood enterprises’ GVC (global value chain) position and its realization path. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023b, 59 (12): 137- 151. | |
蒋宏飞. 我国集体林权改革配套措施在应对俄罗斯上调原木出口关税中的作用: 基于GTAP模型的一般均衡分析. 世界林业研究, 2012, 25 (2): 63- 68. | |
Jiang H F. Roles of CFTR supporting measures in response to Russian rising roundwood export tariffs: computable general equilibrium analysis using GTAP model. World Forestry Research, 2012, 25 (2): 63- 68. | |
江 艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应. 中国工业经济, 2022, (5): 100- 120.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2022.05.007 |
|
Jiang T. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference. China Industrial Economics, 2022, (5): 100- 120.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2022.05.007 |
|
李宜航. 劳动力技能分布与地区出口比较优势: 基于中国省份细分产业数据的研究. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38 (2): 78- 97. | |
Li Y H. Labor skills distribution and regional export comparative advantage: a study based on sub-sector data of Chinese provinces. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2021, 38 (2): 78- 97. | |
刘 璨. 改革开放以来集体林权制度改革的分权演化博弈分析. 中国农村经济, 2020, (5): 21- 38. | |
Liu C. The decentralization of collective forestland tenure reform in China since the reform and opening-up from the perspective of evolutionary game theory. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020, (5): 21- 38. | |
刘 浩, 王雁斌, 刘 璨. 林地细碎化、产权激励对林业生产要素配置的影响. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38 (7): 1771- 1783.
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230709 |
|
Liu H, Wang Y B, Liu C. The effect of forestland fragmentation and tenure incentive on the allocation of forest production input. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38 (7): 1771- 1783.
doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20230709 |
|
潘 丹, 罗璐薏, 季凯文, 等. 农村电子商务发展对林区内部收入差距与共同富裕的影响. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (5): 35- 50.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230525 |
|
Pan D, Luo L Y, Ji K W, et al. Impact of rural E-commerce development on intra-regional income gap and shared prosperity in forested areas. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (5): 35- 50.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230525 |
|
荣庆娇, 姚顺波, 刘 浩. 2015. 集体林主体改革及配套改革对农民收入及其结构的影响测度与分析. 农村经济 (1): 5−59. | |
Rong Q J, Yao S B, Liu H. 2015. Measurement and analysis of the impact of collective forest main reform and supporting reform on farmers’ income and its structure. Rural Economy, (1): 54−59. [in Chinese] | |
施炳展. 中国出口增长的三元边际. 经济学(季刊), 2010, 9 (3): 1311- 1330. | |
Shi B Z. The three margins of China’s export growth. China Economic Quarterly, 2010, 9 (3): 1311- 1330. | |
施炳展, 吴金霞. 贸易协定如何影响贸易增长方式. 国际商务研究, 2022, 43 (6): 27- 41. | |
Shi B Z, Wu J X. How trade agreements affect the patterns of trade growth. International Business Research, 2022, 43 (6): 27- 41. | |
孙传旺, 占妍泓, 徐梦洁. 电力需求响应信号与新能源制造企业绩效. 管理世界, 2024, 40 (12): 185- 203.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.12.012 |
|
Sun C W, Zhan Y H, Xu M J. Electricity demand response signals and the performance of new energy manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40 (12): 185- 203.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.12.012 |
|
王国运, 陈 波. 新一轮农地确权与中国农业增长: 基于面板工具变量法的实证研究. 中国农村经济, 2022, (12): 54- 72. | |
Wang G Y, Chen B. The effects of the new round of agricultural land titling on China’s agricultural growth: an empirical study based on panel instrument variables approach. Chinese Rural Economy, 2022, (12): 54- 72. | |
温映雪, 宁满秀, 刘伟平. 2022. 林地确权真的全面提高了农户营造林积极性吗?农业技术经济 (3): 38−48. | |
Wen Y X, Ning M X, Liu W P. 2022. Are rural households’ incentives on forest management actually motivated by the forest land tenure reform in an all-round way? Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, (3): 38−48. [in Chinese] | |
吴天博, 孙平军. 中国对“丝绸之路经济带” 沿线国家木质林产品出口贸易潜力及其影响因素研究. 地域研究与开发, 2021, 40 (4): 1- 5, 38.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2021.04.001 |
|
Wu T B, Sun P J. Study on import trade potential and influencing factors of national woody forest products along “silk road economic belt”. Areal Research and Development, 2021, 40 (4): 1- 5, 38.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2021.04.001 |
|
邢方圆, 焦奕珩, 侯方淼. 政策性森林保险高质量发展时空演进及影响因素分析. 林业经济, 2024, 46 (6): 5- 27. | |
Xing F Y, Jiao Y H, Hou F M. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factor analysis of high-quality development of policy-based forest insurance. Forestry Economics, 2024, 46 (6): 5- 27. | |
徐晋涛, 孙 妍, 姜雪梅, 等. 我国集体林区林权制度改革模式和绩效分析. 林业经济, 2008, 30 (9): 27- 38. | |
Xu J T, Sun Y, Jiang X M, et al. Collective forest tenure reform in China: analysis of pattern and performance. Forestry Economics, 2008, 30 (9): 27- 38. | |
余文梦, 苏时鹏, 沈大军. 福建集体林权制度改革对生态公益林水源涵养能力变化的影响: 基于723个村的实证研究. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (4): 1362- 1372. | |
Yu W M, Su S P, Shen D J. Effects of the reform of collective forest property rights system on the change of water conservation capacity of ecological public welfare forests: the empirical research of 723 villages in Fujian Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (4): 1362- 1372. | |
张日波. 新发展格局推动经济高质量发展的机理: 基于超边际分析的视角. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 53 (5): 47- 61. | |
Zhang R B. The mechanism of new development pattern in promoting high-quality economic development: from the perspective of infra-marginal analysis. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2023, 53 (5): 47- 61. | |
张 涛, 李均超. 网络基础设施、包容性绿色增长与地区差距: 基于双重机器学习的因果推断. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40 (4): 113- 135. | |
Zhang T, Li J C. Network infrastructure, inclusive green growth, and regional inequality: from causal inference based on double machine learning. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40 (4): 113- 135. | |
周 力, 沈坤荣. 中国农村土地制度改革的农户增收效应: 来自“三权分置” 的经验证据. 经济研究, 2022, 57 (5): 141- 157. | |
Zhou L, Shen K R. Impact of the rural land system reform on rural households’ income growth in China: evidence from the three rights separation. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 57 (5): 141- 157. | |
Chernozhukov V, Chetverikov D, Demirer M, et al. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 2018, 21 (1): 1- 68.
doi: 10.1111/ectj.12099 |
|
Hummels D, Klenow P J. The variety and quality of a nation’s exports. American Economic Review, 2005, 95 (3): 704- 723.
doi: 10.1257/0002828054201396 |
|
Krugman P R. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 1979, 9 (4): 469- 479.
doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5 |
|
Lin J Y. Rural reforms and agricultural growth in China. The American Economic Review, 1992, 82 (1): 34- 51. | |
Ling S, Jin S R, Wang H J, et al. Transportation infrastructure upgrading and green development efficiency: Empirical analysis with double machine learning method. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 358, 120922.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120922 |
|
Liu C, Liu H, Wang S. 2017. Has China’s new round of collective forest reforms caused an increase in the use of productive forest inputs? Land Use Policy, 64: 492−510. | |
Liu S Y, Ma S, Yin L J, et al. Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics, 2023, 165, 103165.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103165 |
|
Melitz M J. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 2003, 71 (6): 1695- 1725.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00467 |
|
Ouyang Q, Wang T T, Deng Y, et al. The impact of environmental regulations on export trade at provincial level in China: evidence from panel quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 (16): 24098- 24111.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17676-z |
|
Yang G, Wang H, Hou Y Y, et al. The impact of collective forest tenure reform on timber production in China: an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Forests, 2024, 15 (2): 312.
doi: 10.3390/f15020312 |
|
Zang L Z, Zhang C H, Xu D Y, et al. Analysis on the spatial distribution and evolutionary trends of farmers’ forestry income in China. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2015, 34 (8): 807- 831.
doi: 10.1080/10549811.2015.1053148 |
|
Zhang H, Buongiorno J, Zhu S. Domestic and foreign consequences of China’s land tenure reform on collective forests. International Forestry Review, 2012, 14 (3): 349- 362.
doi: 10.1505/146554812802646648 |
|
Zhao X, Luckstead J, Devadoss S. Decomposition of extensive and intensive margin impacts of trade policies. The World Economy, 2022, 45 (4): 971- 1020.
doi: 10.1111/twec.13190 |
|
Zhao X Q, Ke X J, Jiang S Y, et al. Exploring the dynamics of urban energy efficiency in China: a double machine learning analysis of green finance influence. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2024, 35, 103653. |
[1] | 魏建,戴永务,刘璨. 新一轮集体林权制度改革对农户经济福利的作用机制与影响测度[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 195-210. |
[2] | 谢芳婷,施建玲,朱臻,沈月琴. 林地产权安全对林农非木质林产品经营投入的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 204-218. |
[3] | 陈幸良,窦亚权. 林下经济高质量发展:战略要义、技术突破与关键举措[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(7): 59-71. |
[4] | 朱臻,姚瑜晨,沈汉,张寒,钱文荣,朱哲毅. 合作社嵌入促进农户“肥药双减”行为了吗——以浙江省非木质林产品经营为例[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 215-230. |
[5] | 潘丹,罗璐薏,季凯文,孔凡斌. 农村电子商务发展对林区内部收入差距与共同富裕的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(5): 35-50. |
[6] | 程钰,刘璨,杨红强,张寒. 商品林种植结构的“趋经济林化”——基于劳动力成本效应及相对收益效应的成因分析[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(7): 184-193. |
[7] | 赵晓迪, 李凌超, 杨文涛, 程宝栋, 刘金龙. 福建省县域森林转型社会经济影响因素分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 147-156. |
[8] | 谢芳婷, 朱述斌, 康小兰, 杜娟, 刘小进. 集体林地不同经营模式对林地经营投入的影响——以江西省为例[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 122-132. |
[9] | 于豪谅, 田明华, 史莹赫, 程经纬, 张振宇. 中国木质林产品外贸依存度算法研究及其测评[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 152-167. |
[10] | 薛彩霞, 姚顺波. 家庭劳动力配置异质性农户非木质林产品经营行为选择——来自陕西省和四川省1131户的调查[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(1): 128-140. |
[11] | 田明华, 史莹赫, 黄雨, 于豪谅, 秦国伟, 柴梅. 中国经济发展、林产品贸易对木材消耗影响的实证分析[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 113-123. |
[12] | 廖文梅. 南方集体林区林业经济增长的产业结构演变及其差异分析——基于13个省(区)1995—2011年的统计数据[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(8): 131-140. |
[13] | 赵静, 李婷婷, 申津羽, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革绩效评价及其对林农森林经营意愿影响分析——基于福建省永安市的农户调查数据[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 138-146. |
[14] | 杨红强, 季春艺, 陈幸良, 聂影. 中国木质林产品贸易的碳流动——基于气候谈判的视角[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(3): 123-129. |
[15] | 王小军, 谢屹, 王立群, 温亚利. 集体林权制度改革中的农户森林经营行为与影响因素——以福建省邵武市和尤溪县为例[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6): 135-142. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||