林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (3): 54-64.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220725
• 前沿与重点:碳达峰、碳中和目标下林业碳汇能力提升 • 上一篇 下一篇
张煜星1,王雪军2,*
收稿日期:
2022-10-26
出版日期:
2023-03-25
发布日期:
2023-05-27
通讯作者:
王雪军
基金资助:
Yuxing Zhang1,Xuejun Wang2,*
Received:
2022-10-26
Online:
2023-03-25
Published:
2023-05-27
Contact:
Xuejun Wang
摘要:
目的: 探究1973—2018年我国桉树人工林资源变化情况、生产力及碳汇能力,揭示桉树人工林连续种植下土壤肥力消耗问题和生产力变化规律,客观评价桉树人工林对保障我国木材供给、保护天然林资源、增强森林碳汇能力和缓解气候变化的贡献,并为制定桉树人工林可持续经营政策提供科学依据。方法: 基于1973—2018年9次全国森林资源清查3 564块桉树样地调查数据以及2003、2016年2期全国林地一张图数据和气象资料等,分析桉树人工林空间分布动态变化,并连续跟踪固定样地桉树变化,根据1994—2018年5期25年桉树人工林固定样地蓄积量数据,定量评价我国桉树人工林的生产力、碳积累能力、弃种率及其原因,构建桉树人工林弃种率模型和生产力模型。结果: 桉树在我国的适宜栽植范围为年均气温19~21 ℃、年降水量1 400~1 600 mm、海拔0~300 m的区域。全国桉树人工林年均生产力一般为4.14~8.57 m3·hm?2a?1,以海南、广东、广西和福建4省(区)较高,2~3年生桉树人工林接近40 m3·hm?2a?1;据第九次(2014—2018年)全国森林资源清查数据,桉树人工林每公顷年均固碳量为5.29 t·hm?2a?1,比同地区速生树种马尾松和杉木人工林分别高2.95和2.18倍。尽管桉树人工林采伐年龄低,46%的采伐量用于造纸,但仍有54%的采伐量以板材形式长期固碳,碳汇功能仍很强。桉树是重要用材树种,虽然全国桉树人工林面积占人工林总面积的6.85%,但木材年采伐量占全国人工林采伐量的17.96%以上,其中广东和广西桉树人工林面积占其人工林总面积的30.32%和34.91%,采伐量分别占66.29%和49.97%。桉树生长旺盛,地力消耗较大,每隔5年原桉树种植面积弃种率25%以上,10和20年时的累计弃种率分别接近50%和75%,存在长期连续种植后地力严重衰退、难以再造林的风险。结论: 通过控制桉树人工林连载经营周期、进行合理轮作、提高科学经营水平等措施,弃种地仍可复种。现在20年内复种的桉树人工林面积占其弃种面积比例不足20%,50年内不足30%,仍有潜力提高复种率。应加强桉树人工林可持续经营,维持土壤肥力,为保障我国木材供给、保护天然林资源、增强森林碳汇能力和缓解气候变化做出更大贡献。
中图分类号:
张煜星,王雪军. 1973—2018年我国桉树人工林生产力及碳汇能力[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(3): 54-64.
Yuxing Zhang,Xuejun Wang. Productivity and Carbon Sink Capacity of Eucalyptus Plantations in China from 1973 to 2018[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(3): 54-64.
表1
各省(市、区)不同时期桉树样地数、生产力平均值和最大值"
省Province | NFI_5th(1994—1998) | NFI_6th(1999—2003) | NFI_7th(2004—2008) | NFI_8th(2009—2013) | NFI_9th(2014-2018) | ||||||||||||||
样地数 Plot number | 生产力均值Mean productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 生产力 最大值Maximum productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数 Plot number | 生产力 均值Mean productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 生产力 最大值Maximum productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数 plot number | 生产力均值Mean productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 生产力 最大值 Maximum productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数 Plot number | 生产力均值Mean productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 生产力 最大值Maximum productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数 Plot number | 生产力均值Mean productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 生产力 最大值Maximum productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | |||||
浙江Zhejiang | 1 | 0.36 | 0.36 | ||||||||||||||||
福建Fujian | 4 | 2.81 | 6.96 | 7 | 3.95 | 10.72 | 66 | 7.82 | 33.32 | 113 | 13.75 | 36.69 | 87 | 9.48 | 29.54 | ||||
江西Jiangxi | 7 | 1.79 | 8.15 | 2 | 1.91 | 3.53 | |||||||||||||
湖南Hunan | 7 | 1.20 | 3.44 | 6 | 2.70 | 7.96 | |||||||||||||
广东Guangdong | 61 | 4.53 | 24.49 | 85 | 5.38 | 34.91 | 276 | 5.38 | 37.15 | 357 | 6.80 | 38.38 | 389 | 6.27 | 33.34 | ||||
广西Guangxi | 15 | 5.43 | 10.23 | 31 | 6.29 | 19.37 | 111 | 4.04 | 24.12 | 344 | 9.76 | 38.51 | 533 | 11.39 | 38.73 | ||||
海南Hainan | 142 | 3.88 | 18.72 | 139 | 4.21 | 22.26 | 161 | 4.64 | 24.50 | 122 | 4.70 | 14.15 | 108 | 6.65 | 29.03 | ||||
重庆Chongqing | 3 | 2.33 | 3.41 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 4.25 | 9.35 | ||||||||||
四川Sichuan | 4 | 2.50 | 4.97 | 13 | 2.65 | 7.86 | 33 | 4.29 | 14.50 | 38 | 7.08 | 17.42 | |||||||
贵州Guizhou | 3 | 2.88 | 7.66 | 8 | 4.99 | 10.63 | |||||||||||||
云南Yunnan | 4 | 3.86 | 6.5 | 6 | 6.43 | 24.17 | 50 | 2.99 | 14.89 | 81 | 6.50 | 27.88 | 88 | 6.55 | 32.01 | ||||
合计Total | 226 | 4.14 | 24.49 | 273 | 5.72 | 34.91 | 687 | 4.94 | 37.15 | 1096 | 7.86 | 38.51 | 1282 | 8.57 | 38.73 |
表2
不同清查时期桉树保留和新增样地连续种植时间与生产力的关系"
连续种植时间Continuous planting time/a | 第5次清查NFI_5th | 第6次清查NFI_6th | 2次清查From the 5th to 6th NFIs | |||||
平均生产力Mean productivity(m3·hm?2·a?1) | 数量Number | 平均生产力Mean productivity(m3·hm?2a?1) | 数量Number | 平均生产力Mean productivity(m3·hm?2·a?1) | 数量Number | |||
1~5 | 4.14 | 226 | 5.34 | 123 | 4.56 | 349 | ||
6~10 | 6.03 | 150 | 6.13 | 76 | 6.06 | 226 | ||
11~15 | 5.71 | 103 | 9.30 | 59 | 7.02 | 162 | ||
16~20 | 6.00 | 72 | 5.64 | 38 | 5.88 | 110 | ||
20~25 | 6.03 | 55 | 6.03 | 55 |
表4
不同清查时期桉树保留样地和弃种样地的数量与平均生产力"
清查 NFI | 样地类型 Plot type | 5th (1994—1998) | 6th (1999—2003) | 7th (2004—2008) | 8th (2009—2013) | 9th (2014—2018) | |||||||||||||
样地 数 Plot number | 生产力Productivity (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地 数 Plot number | 生产力Productivity (m3·hm?2a?1) | 弃种样地Abandoned sample plot number | 样地 数 Plot number | 生产力Productivity (m3·hm?2a?1) | 弃种样地Abandoned sample plot number | 样地 数 Plot number | 生产力Productivity (m3·hm?2a?1) | 弃种样地Abandoned sample plot number | 样地 数 Plot number | 生产力Productivity (m3·hm?2a?1) | 弃种样地Abandoned sample plot number | ||||||
5th | 保留样地 Retained plot | 226 | 4.14 | 150 | 6.03 | 76 | 103 | 5.71 | 47 | 72 | 6 | 31 | 55 | 6.03 | 17 | ||||
6th | 新增样地Newly-cultivated | 123 | 5.34 | 76 | 6.13 | 47 | 59 | 9.30 | 17 | 38 | 5.64 | 21 | |||||||
7th | 新增样地Newly-cultivated | 508 | 4.60 | 413 | 7.59 | 95 | 322 | 7.70 | 91 | ||||||||||
8th | 新增样地Newly-cultivated | 552 | 8.15 | 433 | 9.24 | 119 | |||||||||||||
9th | 新增样地Newly-cultivated | 434 | 9.13 | ||||||||||||||||
合计Total | 226 | 4.14 | 273 | 5.72 | 76 | 687 | 4.94 | 96 | 1 096 | 7.86 | 143 | 1 282 | 8.57 | 248 |
表5
不同时期桉树样地保留数量和弃种率"
项目Item | 样地数Plot number | 5年5 years | 10年10 years | 15年15 years | 20年20 years | |||||||
保留样地数Retained plot number | 累计弃种率Cumulative abandonment rate(%) | 保留样地数Retained plot number | 累计弃种率Cumulative abandonment rate(%) | 保留样地数Retained plot number | 累计弃种率Cumulative abandonment rate(%) | 保留样地数Retained plot number | 累计弃种率Cumulative abandonment rate(%) | |||||
原始样地Original plots (1994—1999) | 226 | 150 | 33.63 | 103 | 54.43 | 72 | 68.15 | 55 | 75.66 | |||
新增样地Newly-cultivated plots (1999—2003) | 123 | 76 | 38.21 | 59 | 52.03 | 38 | 69.1 | |||||
新增样地Newly cultivated plots (2004—2008) | 508 | 413 | 18.7 | 322 | 36.61 | |||||||
新增样地Newly-cultivated plots (2009—2013) | 552 | 433 | 21.56 | |||||||||
新增样地plots Newly-cultivate (2014—2108) | 434 | |||||||||||
平均弃种率Mean abandoned rate | 23.92 | 24.26 | 32.1 | 23.61 | ||||||||
累计弃种率Cumulative abandonment rate | 1 843 | 23.92 | 43.52 | 68.48 | 75.66 |
表6
各时期桉树弃种样地土地利用变化"
弃种 时段Abandonment period | 弃种样地数 Abandoned plot number | NFI_6th(1999—2003) | NFI_7th(2004—2008) | NFI_8th(2009—2013) | NFI_9th(2014-2018) | |||||||||||
种植桉树 Growing Eucalyptus | 种植其他树种 Growing non- Eucalyptus species | 非林地 Non-plantation use | 种植桉树 Growing Eucalyptus | 种植其他树种 Growing non- Eucalyptus species | 非林地 Non-plantation use | 种植桉树 Growing Eucalyptus | 种植其他树种 Growing non- Eucalyptus species | 非林地 Non-plantation use | 种植桉树 Growing Eucalyptus | 种植其他树种 Growing non- Eucalyptus species | 非林地 Non-plantation use | |||||
NFI_6th | 76 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 26 | 40 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 31 | 32 | |||||
NFI_7th | 47 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 17 | 17 | |||||||||
47 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 22 | |||||||||||
NFI_8th | 31 | |||||||||||||||
17 | ||||||||||||||||
95 | ||||||||||||||||
NFI_9th | 17 | |||||||||||||||
21 | ||||||||||||||||
91 | ||||||||||||||||
119 | ||||||||||||||||
合计Total | 561 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 26 | 40 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 1 | 51 | 71 | |||
比例Percentage(%) | 100 | 5.26 | 2.63 | 5.26 | 0.00 | 34.21 | 52.64 | 4.71 | 8.82 | 14.12 | 0.59 | 30.00 | 41.76 |
表7
各时期桉树弃种样地的种植树种变化"
清查 NFI | 项目 Item | 6th | 7th | 8th | 9th | 合计Total | 比例Percentage(%) | |||||||
6th | 弃种样地数Quantity of abandoned plot | 76 | 47 | 47 | 31 | 17 | 95 | 17 | 21 | 91 | 119 | 561 | 100 | |
针叶树种Conifers | 4 | 4 | 5.26 | |||||||||||
阔叶树种 Broad-leaf trees | 桉树Eucalyptus | 2 | 2 | 2.63 | ||||||||||
非桉树 Non-Eucalyptus | 4 | 4 | 5.26 | |||||||||||
混交树种 Mixed forest | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
经济树种 Economic tree species | 26 | 26 | 34.21 | |||||||||||
无林地Not used for plantation | 40 | 40 | 52.64 | |||||||||||
7th | 针叶树种Conifers | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4.71 | ||||||||
阔叶树种 Broad-leaf trees | 桉树Eucalyptus | 8 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 8.82 | ||||||||
非桉树Non-Eucalyptus | 1 | 8 | 15 | 24 | 14.12 | |||||||||
混交树种Mixed forest | 1 | 1 | 0.59 | |||||||||||
经济树种Economic tree species | 31 | 17 | 3 | 51 | 30 | |||||||||
无林地Not used for plantation | 32 | 17 | 22 | 71 | 41.76 | |||||||||
8th | 针叶树种Conifers | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 5.11 | ||||||
阔叶树种 Broad-leaf trees | 桉树Eucalyptus | 8 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 45 | 14.38 | |||||
非桉树Non-Eucalyptus | 2 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 45 | 14.38 | ||||||
混交树种Mixed forest | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 2.88 | ||||||||
经济树种Economic tree species | 31 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 85 | 27.16 | ||||||
无林地Not used for plantation | 31 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 8 | 41 | 113 | 36.09 | ||||||
9th | 针叶树种Conifers | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 36 | 6.42 | |||
阔叶树种 Broad-leaf trees | 桉树Eucalyptus | 12 | 5 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 89 | 15.86 | |
非桉树Non-Eucalyptus | 1 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 22 | 30 | 104 | 18.54 | ||
混交树种Mixed forest | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 12 | 30 | 5.35 | ||||||
经济树种Economic tree species | 28 | 21 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 103 | 18.36 | ||
无林地Not used for plantation | 32 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 32 | 7 | 13 | 34 | 44 | 199 | 35.47 |
表8
各时期桉树弃种样地复种情况"
清查Period | 弃种样地 数 Abandoned plotnumber | 弃种5年内 Replanting within 5 years | 弃种10年内Replanting within 10 years | 弃种15年内 Replanting within 15 years | 弃种20年内 Replanting within 20 years | |||||||||||
样地数Plotnumber | 桉树复 种率 Replanting rate of Eucalyptus (%) | 桉树复种率累计Cumulative eucalyptus replanting rate(%) | 样地数Plotnumber | 桉树复 种率 Replanting rate of Eucalyptus (%) | 桉树复种率累计Cumulative Eucalyptus replanting rate(%) | 样地数Plotnumber | 桉树复 种率 Replanting rate of Eucalyptus (%) | 桉树复种率累计Cumulative Eucalyptus replanting rate(%) | 样地数Plotnumber | 桉树复 种率 Replanting rate of Eucalyptus (%) | 桉树复种率累计Cumulative Eucalyptus replanting rate(%) | |||||
6th | 76 | 2 | 2.63 | 2.63 | 6 | 7.89 | 10.53 | 0 | 0 | 10.53 | 4 | 5.26 | 15.79 | |||
7th | 94 | 7 | 7.45 | 7.45 | 14 | 14.89 | 22.34 | 3 | 3.19 | 25.53 | ||||||
8th | 143 | 16 | 11.19 | 11.19 | 11 | 7.69 | 18.88 | 0 | ||||||||
9th | 248 | 26 | 10.48 | 10.48 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
合计Total | 561 | 51 | 9.09 | 9.09 | 31 | 5.53 | 14.62 | 3 | 0.53 | 15.15 | 4 | 5.26 | 15.86 |
表9
弃种样地复种桉树后的生产力分析"
清查Period | 弃种样地 数 Abandoned plot number | 弃种5年内复种桉树的生产力 Replanting productivity (<5 years of abandonment) | 弃种10年内复种桉树的生产力 Replanting productivity (<10 years of abandonment) | 弃种15年内复种桉树的生产力 Replanting productivity (<15 years of abandonment) | 弃种20年内复种桉树生产力 Replanting productivity (<20 years of abandonment) | |||||||
样地数Plot number | 生产力Productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数Plot number | 生产力Productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数Plot number | 生产力Productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | 样地数Plot number | 生产力Productivity/ (m3·hm?2a?1) | |||||
6th | 76 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2.49 | 0 | 4 | 8.93 | ||||
7th | 94 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 5.90 | 3 | 10.88 | |||||
8th | 143 | 16 | 0 | 11 | 9.32 | |||||||
9th | 248 | 26 | 0 | |||||||||
合计Total | 561 | 51 | 0 | 31 | 6.45 | 3 | 10.88 | 4 | 8.93 |
表10
各时期各省份桉树人工林的碳密度( $C_\rho$ )和碳储量(C0)"
省份Province | 1973—1976 | 1977—1981 | 1984—1988 | 1989—1993 | 1994—1998 | 1999—2003 | 2004—2008 | 2009—2013 | 2014—2018 | |||||||||||||||||
(t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | (t·hm?2) | C0/106t | |||||||||
浙江Zhejiang | 2.08 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
福建Fujian | 6.87 | 2.18 | 18.46 | 10.02 | 15.85 | 6.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||
江西Jiangxi | 5.01 | 0.45 | 3.91 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
湖南Hunan | 1.56 | 0.07 | 7.03 | 0.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
广东Guangdong | 5.31 | 1.91 | 11.77 | 3.89 | 5.59 | 1.93 | 7.62 | 2.78 | 5.18 | 3.03 | 7.36 | 6.00 | 5.27 | 13.95 | 9.95 | 34.08 | 8.72 | 32.55 | ||||||||
广西Guangxi | 4.90 | 0.49 | 2.60 | 0.25 | 3.47 | 0.40 | 12.01 | 1.73 | 4.33 | 1.29 | 5.61 | 5.99 | 10.94 | 36.17 | 12.83 | 65.70 | ||||||||||
海南Hainan | 3.47 | 0.75 | 6.45 | 2.06 | 10.25 | 3.49 | 11.16 | 3.72 | 9.09 | 3.51 | 12.41 | 3.63 | 14.84 | 3.84 | ||||||||||||
重庆Chongqing | 15.63 | 0.15 | 5.59 | 0.52 | 12.15 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||
四川Sichuan | 3.91 | 0.05 | 5.47 | 0.14 | 9.26 | 0.45 | 6.33 | 0.80 | 7.99 | 2.56 | 18.34 | 6.76 | ||||||||||||||
贵州Guizhou | 4.17 | 0.08 | 9.34 | 0.48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
云南Yunnan | 0.04 | 11.86 | 1.48 | 9.72 | 1.12 | 4.83 | 2.32 | 14.18 | 11.03 | 18.71 | 15.81 | |||||||||||||||
合计Total | 5.22 | 2.40 | 9.71 | 4.14 | 4.68 | 2.73 | 6.28 | 5.42 | 8.01 | 9.73 | 7.65 | 12.58 | 5.68 | 28.90 | 11.07 | 98.61 | 12.16 | 133.00 |
陈少雄, 郑嘉琪, 刘学锋 中国桉树培育技术百年发展史与展望. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31 (2): 7- 12. | |
Chen S X, Zheng J Q, Liu X F The development history and prospect of Eucalyptus cultivation technology in China. World Forestry Research, 2018, 31 (2): 7- 12. | |
国家林业和草原局. 2019. 中国森林资源报告(2014—2018). 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
National Forestry and Grassland Administration. 2019. National forest resources statistics (2014—2018) . Beijing: China Forestry Press. [in Chinese] | |
侯元兆. 2006. 科学地认识我国南方发展桉树速生丰产林问题. 世界林业研究, 19(3): 71−76. | |
Hou Y Z. 2006. Scientific understanding of the development of Eucalyptus fast-growing and high-yield forest in South China. World Forestry Research, 19 (3): 71−76. [in Chinese] | |
季春艺. 2013. 中国木质林产品碳流量核算及影响研究. 南京: 南京林业大学. | |
Ji C Y. 2013. Study on estimation and potential impact of carbon in China’s harvested wood products. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
刘杰锋 我国桉树研究现状与发展态势. 桉树科技, 2009, 26 (2): 50- 62. | |
Liu J F Research status and development trend of Eucalyptus in China. Eucalyptus Technology, 2009, 26 (2): 50- 62. | |
刘 涛, 谢耀坚 中国桉树人工林快速发展动因分析与展望. 桉树科技, 2020, 37 (4): 38- 47. | |
Liu T, Xie Y J Studies on the causes of rapid development of Eucalyptus plantations in China. Eucalypt Science & Technology, 2020, 37 (4): 38- 47. | |
吕小燕, 何 斌, 吴永富, 等 连栽桉树人工林土壤有机碳氮储量及其分布特征. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38 (10): 1874- 1880. | |
Lü X Y, He B, Wu Y F, et al Soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks and their distribution characteristics in successive planted eucalyptus forests. Journal of Tropical Crops, 2017, 38 (10): 1874- 1880. | |
潘嘉雯, 林 娜, 何 茜, 等 我国3个桉树人工林种植区生产力影响因素. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (19): 6932- 6940. | |
Pan J W Lin N, He X, et al Factors influencing the productivity of three Eucalyptus plantation areas in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38 (19): 6932- 6940. | |
钱国钦 桉树生态问题及发展思路. 湖南林业科技, 2007, 34 (2): 67- 70. | |
Qian G Q Ecological problems and development ideas of Eucalyptus. Hunan Forestry Science and Technology, 2007, 34 (2): 67- 70. | |
苏贻攀 桉树连栽对土壤养分含量的影响及应对措施. 福建林业科技, 2016, 43 (2): 206- 211. | |
Su Y P Effects of continuous planting of Eucalyptus on soil nutrient content and countermeasures. Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2016, 43 (2): 206- 211. | |
唐 健, 赵隽宇, 覃祚玉, 等 1993—2018年广西桉树主产区土壤肥力演变特征分析. 中国农学通报, 2021, 7 (1): 94- 99. | |
Tang J, Zhao J Y, Qin Z Y, et al Soil fertility evolution characteristics in main Eucalyptus producing areas of Guangxi: 1993—2018. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 7 (1): 94- 99. | |
王文波, 王延平, 王华田, 等 杨树人工林连作与轮作对土壤氮素细菌类群和氮素代谢的影响. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (5): 45- 54. | |
Wang W, Wang Y P, Wang H T, et al Effects of different continuous cropping and rotation of poplar plantation on soil nitrogen bacteria community and nitrogen metabolism. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (5): 45- 54. | |
温远光, 刘世荣, 陈 放 桉树工业人工林的生态问题与可持续经营. 广西科学院学报, 2005, (1): 13- 17. | |
Wen Y G, Liu S R, Chen F Ecological problems and sustainable management of Eucalyptus industrial plantation. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 2005, (1): 13- 17. | |
温远光, 周晓果, 喻素芳, 等 全球桉树人工林发展面临的困境与对策. 广西科学, 2018, 25 (2): 107- 116. | |
Wen Y G, Zhou X G, Yu S F, et al Difficulties and countermeasures in the development of global Eucalyptus plantation. Guangxi Science, 2018, 25 (2): 107- 116. | |
谢耀坚 中国桉树育种研究进展及宏观策略. 世界林业研究, 2011, 24 (4): 50- 54. | |
Xie Y J Research progress and macro strategy of Eucalyptus breeding in China. World Forestry Research, 2011, 24 (4): 50- 54. | |
谢耀坚 科技创新引领中国桉树研究和产业迅猛发展. 桉树科技, 2022, 39 (1): 35- 42. | |
Xie Y J Scientific innovation leads to fast development of Eucalyptus research and industry in China . Eucalyptus Technology, 2022, 39 (1): 35- 42. | |
许小波 浅谈速生桉树营造林对我国林业科学的影响及发展趋势. 农业与技术, 2012, 32 (10): 50- 52. | |
Xu X B Discussion on the influence and development trend of fast-growing Eucalyptus afforestation on China's forestry science. Agriculture and Technology, 2012, 32 (10): 50- 52. | |
张煜星, 王雪军, 蒲 莹, 等 1949—2018年中国森林资源碳储量变化研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43 (5): 1- 14. | |
Zhang Y X, Wang X J, Pu Y, et al Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 2018. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43 (5): 1- 14. | |
郑洲翔, 张艳艳, 廖文莉, 等. 2020. 我国桉树人工林对土壤状况影响研究进展, 桉树科技, 37(3): 59-64. | |
Zheng Z X, Zhang Y Y, Liao W L, et al .2020. Research progress on the effect of Eucalyptus plantations on soil conditions in China. Eucalyptus Science and Technology, 37 (3): 59 – 64. [in Chinese] | |
周润惠, 唐永彬, 王 敏, 等 威远不同年龄桉树人工林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质特征. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27 (3): 742- 748. | |
Zhou R H, Tang Y B, Wang M, et al. Characteristics of species diversity and soil physicochemical properties in the understory of Eucalyptus plantation forests of different ages in Weiyuan. Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2021, 27 (3): 742- 748. | |
Chen C H, Yong T C Results of adaptability test of twenty Eucalyptus species growth in Taiwan. Bulletin of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute New Series, 1996, 10 (3): 283- 292. | |
Jean M C, John P, Eckehard B, et al Planted forests and bio-diversity. Journal of Forestry, 2006, 104 (2): 65- 77. | |
Parfitt R L, Ross D J Long-term effects of afforestation with Pinus radiata on soil carbon, nitrogen, and pH: a case study . Soil Research, 2011, 49 (6): 494- 503.
doi: 10.1071/SR11106 |
|
Vihervaara P, Marjokorpi A, Kumpula T, et al Ecosystem services of fast- growing tree plantations: a case study on integrating social valuations with land-use changes in Uruguay. Forest Policy and Economics, 2012, 14 (1): 58- 68.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.008 |
|
Zhang Y X, Wang X J Geographical spatial distribution and productivity dynamic change of Eucalyptus plantations in China. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11 (1): 1- 15.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8 |
[1] | 曾伟生,蒲莹,杨学云,易善军. 我国5种主要人工林乔木层碳储量生长模型及其气候驱动分析[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(3): 21-30. |
[2] | 田惠玲,朱建华,何潇,陈新云,简尊吉,李宸宇,郭学媛,黄国胜,肖文发. 基于随机森林模型的东北三省乔木林生物质碳储量预测[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(4): 40-50. |
[3] | 付晓,张煜星,王雪军. 2060年前我国森林生物量碳库及碳汇潜力预测[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2): 32-41. |
[4] | 侯志康,曾松伟,莫路锋,周宇峰. 基于GA-BP神经网络的雷竹林CO2浓度反演[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(2): 42-48. |
[5] | 王楚彪,罗建中,何文亮,卢万鸿,林彦,区余端. 桉树无性系多区域联合测试的G×E分析及选优[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(11): 108-117. |
[6] | 彭欣,王瀚棠,郭春晖,杨振德,周静,王雪,丁芷柔. 入侵性致瘿害虫桉树枝瘿姬小蜂(膜翅目: 姬小蜂科)EST-SSR开发及隐种鉴定[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(9): 140-151. |
[7] | 王爱君,路东晔,张国盛,黄海广,王颖,呼斯楞,敖民. 基于MaxEnt模拟欧亚大陆气候变化下叉子圆柏的潜在分布[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(8): 43-55. |
[8] | 王雪峰,陈珠琳,管青军,刘嘉政,王甜,袁莹. 基于林内图像的单位面积碳储量估计方法[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(1): 105-112. |
[9] | 侯文军,邹明,李宝福,俞元春. 施用草甘膦对桉树人工林土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(8): 20-26. |
[10] | 竹万宽,许宇星,王志超,杜阿朋. 中国桉树人工林生物量估算系数及影响要素[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 1-11. |
[11] | 王振鹏,陈金磊,李尚益,张仕吉,方晰. 湘中丘陵区不同恢复阶段森林生态系统的碳储量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 19-28. |
[12] | 张晓玮,王婧如,王明浩,杨毅,赵长明. 中国云杉属树种地理分布格局的主导气候因子[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 1-11. |
[13] | 武金翠,周军,张宇,余晓燕,石雷,漆良华. 毛竹林固碳增汇价值的动态变化:以福建省为例[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(4): 181-187. |
[14] | 朱万泽. 成熟森林固碳研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(3): 117-126. |
[15] | 王晓玮, 任雪燕, 梁英梅. 基于MaxEnt模型的松针红斑病在中国的潜在分布区及适生性预测分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 160-170. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||