林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 10-21.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20210639
赵世魁1,2,郭晋平1,*,张芸香1
收稿日期:
2020-08-24
出版日期:
2023-02-25
发布日期:
2023-04-27
通讯作者:
郭晋平
基金资助:
Shikui Zhao1,2,Jinping Guo1,*,Yunxiang Zhang1
Received:
2020-08-24
Online:
2023-02-25
Published:
2023-04-27
Contact:
Jinping Guo
摘要:
目的: 通过增温对比试验观测天然次生林演替序列森林内不同层次植物根系呼吸速率生长季的变化,揭示森林演替和模拟增温及其交互作用对根系呼吸速率的影响,为森林更新过程中土壤碳循环对气候变暖响应机制的研究提供数据支持。方法: 以关帝山4种天然次生林(杨桦林、油松林、华北落叶松林和白杄林)为对象,采用野外定点对比试验,以林下地面搭建温室模拟林地增温和用去根试验结合差减法区分根系呼吸组分。于2016—2019年利用Li-6400便携式分析仪观测根系呼吸速率。结果: 增温提高了4种林型细根生物量和根系总呼吸(土壤自养呼吸)的生长季碳通量;增温显著提高了灌木层和草本层根系呼吸速率,提高幅度分别为8.37%~15.26%和10.88%~14.00%,降低了根系呼吸速率的温度敏感性(Q10)。但增温没有改变根系呼吸的生长季单极值变化特征。各林分细根生物量和根系呼吸速率均随演替进程而降低,而根系呼吸速率Q10的值则升高。结论: 灌木和草本层根系呼吸速率对增温和演替及其交互作用的响应程度显著,而乔木层根系呼吸速率对增温和增温与演替的交互作用响应程度不显著。随林地温度升高,森林根系呼吸速率升高而温度敏感性却降低,说明森林根系呼吸速率对温度升高的响应较为复杂。
中图分类号:
赵世魁,郭晋平,张芸香. 暖温带山地天然次生林演替序列根系呼吸速率对林地增温的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(2): 10-21.
Shikui Zhao,Jinping Guo,Yunxiang Zhang. Responses of Root Respiration to Woodland Warming during Growing Season in Succession Series of Natural Secondary Forest in Warm-Temperate Mountain[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(2): 10-21.
表1
试验地的立地条件和林分生长概况①"
林型 Forest type | 地点 Location | 海拔 Altitude/m | 坡向 Slope aspect | 土壤 类型 Soil type | 郁闭度 Canopy closure (%) | 枯落物 干质量 Dried litter weight/ (t·hm ?2) | 平均胸径 Mean DBH/cm | 林龄 Stand age/a | 林分密度 Stand density/ hm?2 | 平均树高 Mean tree height/m | 草本盖度 Herb coverage (%) |
PM | 神尾沟Shenweigou +柴禄沟Chailugou | 2 130.1±290.2 | 阴坡Shady slope | 棕壤Brown loam | 74.4±8.2a | 28.80±9.09a | 29.56±17.05a | 61±1a | 648±78b | 16.3±4.8a | 19.7±9.2b |
LP | 神尾沟Shenweigou +柴禄沟Chailugou | 2 001.2±34.3 | 阴坡Shady slope | 棕壤 Brown loam | 67.2±15.5a | 30.10±8.37a | 26.78±18.58b | 56±9b | 657±69b | 155±5.9b | 21.4±8.4b |
PT | 神尾沟Shenweigou | 1 900.8±48.9 | 阴坡 Shady slope | 棕壤 Brown loam | 65.3±9.1a | 33.93±10.20a | 26.22±18.89b | 58±4b | 681±74b | 17.7±6.3a | 20.4±9.3b |
PB | 八道沟Badaogou | 1 800.5±57.1 | 阴坡 Shady slope | 棕壤Brown loam | 66.3±9.1a | 32.60±7.90a | 25.28±14.45b | 52±4b | 721±80a | 17.5±3.9a | 29.4±8.2a |
表2
根系呼吸试验设计"
处理Treatment | 去根处理方法Method of root removal | 土壤呼吸含义Meaning of soil respiration | 增温处理Warming treatment |
A | 保留乔木、灌木和草本根系With all plant roots | 对照 CK | 搭拱棚/露地Arched shed/open ground |
B | 去除乔木根系,保留灌木和草本根系Remove tree roots only | 无乔木根系呼吸No tree root respiration | 搭拱棚/露地Arched shed/open ground |
C | 去除乔木和草本根系,保留灌木根系Remove roots of tree and herbs,and retain roots of shrubs | 无乔木和草本根系呼吸No root respiration of trees and herbs | 搭拱棚/露地Arched shed/open ground |
D | 去除乔木、灌木和草本根系Remove all plant roots | 无所有植物根系呼吸No plant root respiration | 搭拱棚/露地Arched shed/open ground |
表3
0~20 cm土层细根生物量的试验设计"
处理号 Treatment numbers | 去根处理 Method of root removal | 土壤细根根系组成 Composition of fine root system in soil | 增温处理 Warming treatment |
A | 保留乔木、灌木和草本根系 With roots of trees, shrubs and herbs | 乔、灌、草根系 Roots of trees, shrubs, and herbs | 搭拱棚/露地 Arched shed/open ground |
B | 去除乔木根系,保留灌木和草本根系 Remove roots of trees only | 灌木和草本根系 Roots of shrubs and herbs | 搭拱棚/露地 Arched shed/open ground |
C | 去除草本根系+乔木根系,保留灌木根系 Remove roots of herbs and trees | 灌木根系 Roots of shrubs | 搭拱棚/露地 Arched shed/open ground |
表4
增温和对照处理下细根生物量的对比①"
根系组成 Roots composition | 处理 Treatment | 林型 Forest type | |||
PB | PT | LP | PM | ||
乔木层根系 | CK | 1.83±0.19a | 1.82±0.16a | 1.81±0.19a | 1.76±0.18a |
Roots of trees | 增温Warming | 1.88±0.19a | 1.84±0.17a | 1.82±0.19a | 1.77±0.17a |
灌木层根系 | CK | 1.23±0.10a | 1.12±0.14a | 1.11±0.11a | 1.06±0.09b |
Roots of shrubs | 增温Warming | 1.28±1.11a | 1.14±0.10a | 1.13±0.10a | 1.09±0.10b* |
草本层根系 | CK | 0.55±0.06a | 0.52±0.04a | 0.51±0.05a | 0.39±0.3b |
Roots of herbs | 增温Warming | 0.61±0.07a* | 0.57±0.05a* | 0.58±0.06a* | 0.49±0.4a * |
总根系 | CK | 3.61±0.33a | 3.46±0.30a | 3.44±0.29a | 3.11±0.54b |
Total roots | 增温Warming | 3.77±0.40a | 3.55±0.41a | 3.53±0.38a | 3.35±0.42b |
表5
增温和对照处理下根系呼吸速率及其碳通量的对比"
项目 Item | 处理 Treatment | 林型 Forest type | |||
PB | PT | LP | PM | ||
生长季月份碳通量 | CK | 412.55±52.11a | 406.10±41.00a | 359.65±40.11b | 351.52±36.10b |
Monthly carbon flux/(t· hm?2m?1) | 增温Warming | 446.20±45.00a | 440.38±39.69a | 389.03±39.99b | 381.42±38.00b |
根系总呼吸速率 | CK | 1.32±0.13a | 1.30±0.12a | 1.15±0.11b | 1.12±0.10b |
Rate of total root respiration/(μmol·m?2s?1) | 增温Warming | 1.43±0.15a* | 1.41±0.15a* | 1.25±0.14a* | 1.22±0.13a* |
表6
增温和对照处理下根系呼吸速率Q10值的对比"
处理Treatmeat | 乔木层 Treer layer | 灌木层 Shrub layer | 草本层 Herb layer | |||||||||||
PB | PT | LP | PM | PB | PT | LP | PM | PB | PT | LP | PM | |||
对照CK | 2.26±1.20b | 2.36±1.01b | 2.55±0.89a | 2.64±0.99a | 2.33±1.23c | 2.39±0.899c | 2.58±1.25b | 2.87±1.07a | 2.36±1.89c | 2.49±0.89c | 2.87±1.53b | 3.24±1.63a | ||
增温Warming | 2.16±0.99b | 2.19±1.25b | 2.53±1.69a | 2.45±1.27a | 2.22±0.89c | 2.29±1.25c | 2.51±1.31b | 2.69±1.02a | 2.19±1.23c | 2.39±1.48c | 2.81±1.84b | 2.99±1.23a |
表7
增温、演替及其交互作用对根系呼吸速率的影响"
土壤呼吸类型Soil respiration type | 增温Warming | 演替Succession | 增温×演替Warming×Succession |
Rta | 0.012* | 0.034* | 0.045* |
Rra | 0.082 | 0.043* | 0.097 |
Rrs | 0.012* | 0.013* | 0.032* |
Rrh | 0.021* | 0.051* | 0.024* |
Rta /RtQ10(Rta)Q10(Rra)Q10 (Rrh)Q10(Rrs) | 0.0610.1530.9930.1010.214 | 0.045*0.0820.6810.041*0.069 | 0.1090.048*0.5590.038*0.291 |
白秀梅, 韩有志, 郭汉清 庞泉沟自然保护区典型森林土壤大团聚体特征. 生态学报, 2014, 34 (7): 1654- 1662. | |
Bai X M, Han Y Z, Guo H Q Characteristics of soil macroaggregates under typical forests in Pangquangou Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34 (7): 1654- 1662. | |
陈 平, 赵 博, 闫子超, 等 太岳山油松人工林土壤呼吸对模拟氮沉降的短期响应. 生态学报, 2018, 38 (22): 8184- 8193. | |
Chen P, Zhao B, Yan Z C, et al Short- term response of soil respiration to simulated nitrogen deposition in a Pinus tabulaeformis plantation on Taiyue Mountain, China . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38 (22): 8184- 8193. | |
陈仕东, 刘小飞, 熊德成, 等 持续性主动增温对中亚热带森林土壤呼吸影响研究初报. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 2013, 8 (4): 1- 8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7105.2013.04.001 |
|
Chen S D, Liu X F, Xong D C, et al A preliminary study on effects of continuous active warming on soil respiration rates in central sub-tropical forests. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2013, 8 (4): 1- 8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7105.2013.04.001 |
|
程 严, 列志旸, 刘旭军, 等 增温对南亚热带针阔叶混交林凋落物分解酶活性的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27 (4): 923- 929.
doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.10024 |
|
Cheng Y, Li Z Y, Liu X J, et al Effects of warming on litter-decomposition enzyme activities in coniferous broad-leaved mixed forest in south subtropical China. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2021, 27 (4): 923- 929.
doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.10024 |
|
段北星, 蔡体久, 宋 浩, 等 寒温带兴安落叶松林凋落物层对土壤呼吸的影响. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (4): 1357- 1366. | |
Duan B X, Cai T J, Song H, et al Effect of soil Iittalfall on soil respiration in cold-temperate Larch forest. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40 (4): 1357- 1366. | |
高润梅, 郭晋平 文峪河上游河岸林的演替分析与预测. 生态学报, 2010, 30 (6): 1564- 1572. | |
Gao R M, Guo J P Succession andprediction of the riparianforest inupper-reachof Wenyuhe Watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30 (6): 1564- 1572. | |
高一飞, 张 静, 唐旭利, 等 亚热带马尾松林恢复过程中物种丰富度及生物量变化. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25 (1): 22- 29.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.01.004 |
|
Gao Y F, Zhang J, Tang X L, et al Variation of biomass and species richness in subtropical forest based on Pinus massoniana succession . Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25 (1): 22- 29.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2016.01.004 |
|
耿兆鹏, 毛子军, 黄 唯, 等 小兴安岭原始阔叶红松林与枫桦次生林土壤呼吸及其各组分特征的比较研究. 植物研究, 2017, 37 (2): 312- 320.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.02.021 |
|
Geng Z P, Mao Z J, Huang W, et al Comparative study on the soil respiration and component characteristics of primary broad- leaved Korean pine forest and Betula costata secondary forest in Xiaoxing’ an Mountatins, China . Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37 (2): 312- 320.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.02.021 |
|
黄 唯, 毛子军, 韩营营, 等 小兴安岭地区枫桦次生林与原始阔叶红松林土壤呼吸和地下碳分配. 植物研究, 2015, 35 (3): 384- 390.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.03.010 |
|
Huang W, Mao Z J, Han Y Y, et al Soil respiration and total belowground carbon allocation of Betula costata secondary forest and mixed broadleaved Korean pine forest in Xiaoxing’an Mountains, China . Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2015, 35 (3): 384- 390.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.03.010 |
|
金 超, 吴初平, 丁 易, 等 午潮山常绿次生阔叶林主要木本植物功能群及其演替特征. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (8): 3053- 3066. | |
Jin C, Wu C P, Ding Y, et al The functional groups and their succession characteristics of dominant population in an evergreen secondary broad-leaved forest of Wu Chao Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (8): 3053- 3066. | |
雷 蕾, 肖文发, 曾立雄, 等 马尾松林土壤呼吸组分对不同营林措施的响应. 生态学报, 2016, 36 (17): 5360- 5370. | |
Lei L, Xiao W F, Zeng L X, et al Responses of soil respiration and its components to forest management in Pinus massoniana stands . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36 (17): 5360- 5370. | |
李 超, 林伟盛, 杨智杰, 等 中亚热带杉木人工幼林林下植被生物量对短期增温和隔离降雨交互作用的响应. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39 (8): 2528- 2537.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202008.014 |
|
Li C, Lin W S, Yang Z J, et al Responses of understory vegetation biomass to interaction between short-term warming and isolated rainfall in a subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39 (8): 2528- 2537.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202008.014 |
|
刘 美, 陈亚梅, 崔宁洁, 等 模拟增温对高寒灌丛生长季土壤呼吸的影响. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40 (4): 1038- 1048.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202104.026 |
|
Liu M, Chen Y M, Cui N J, et al Effects of simulated warming on soil respiration in growing season in an alpine scrubland. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40 (4): 1038- 1048.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202104.026 |
|
李先锋. 2018. 中亚热带格氏栲天然林和杉木人工林土壤呼吸及其组分对土壤增温的响应. 福州: 福建师范大学. | |
Li X F. 2018. Responses of soil respiration and its components to soil warming in natural forests of subtropical Castanopsis kawakamii and Cuninghamia lanceolata plantations. Fujian : Fujian Normal University. [in Chinese] | |
刘运通, 张一平, 武传胜, 等. 2016. 模拟亚热带常绿阔叶林土壤温度与土壤异养呼吸对气候变暖的响应. 生态学杂志, 35(7): 1799−1806. | |
Liu Y T, Zhang Y P, Wu C S, et al. 2016. Simulation of the responses of soil temperature and soil heterotrophic respiration to climate warming in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest. Chinese Journal of Ecology. 35(7): 1799−1806. [in Chinese] | |
马志良, 赵文强, 刘 美, 等, 2018. 土壤呼吸组分对气候变暖的响应研究进展. 应用生态学报, 29(10): 3477−3486. | |
Ma Z L, Zhao W Q, Liu M, et al. 2018. Research progress on the responses of soil respiration components to climatic warming. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(10): 3477−3486. [in Chinese] | |
蒲晓婷, 林伟盛, 杨玉盛, 等 杉木幼林土壤垂直剖面CO2通量对土壤增温的响应 . 环境科学学报, 2017, 37 (1): 288- 297. | |
Pu X T, Lin W S, Yang Y S, et al Vertical profile of soil CO2 flux in a young Chinese fir plantation in response to soil warming . Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2017, 37 (1): 288- 297. | |
唐偲頔, 张 政, 蔡小真, 等 增温和隔离降雨对亚热带森林土壤N2O通量的影响 . 应用生态学报, 2017, 28 (10): 3119- 3126. | |
Tang C D, Zhang Z, Cai X Z, et al Effects of warming and precipitation exclusion on soil N2O fluxes in subtropical forests . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28 (10): 3119- 3126. | |
田志杰, 刘晓莹, 陈春兰, 等 五台山臭冷杉林土壤呼吸时空变化特征. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39 (12): 3952- 3960.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202012.018 |
|
Tian Z J, Liu X Y, Chen C L, et al Temporal and spatial variation characteristics of soil respiration in Abies odorifera forest in Wutai Mountain . Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39 (12): 3952- 3960.
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202012.018 |
|
王 一, 刘彦春, 刘世荣, 等. 2016. 模拟气候变暖和林内穿透雨减少对干旱年暖温带锐齿栎林土壤呼吸的影响. 林业科学研究, 29(5): 698−704. | |
Wang Y, Liu Y C, Liu S R, et al. 2016. Response of soil respiration to soil warming and through fall exclusion in warm- temperate oak forest in Drought Year. Forest Research, 29(5): 698−704. [in Chinese] | |
许辰森, 熊德成, 邓 飞, 等 杉木幼苗和伴生植物细根对土壤增温的生理生态响应. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (4): 1232- 1243. | |
Xu C S, Xiong D C, Deng F, et al The ecophysiological responses of fine-roots of Chinese fir(Cunninghamia lanceolata) seedlings and the associated plants to soil warming . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (4): 1232- 1243. | |
严俊霞, 李洪建, 李君剑, 等 山西高原落叶松人工林土壤呼吸的空间异质性. 环境科学, 2015, 36 (5): 1793- 1801.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.05.039 |
|
Yan J X, Li H J, Li J J, et al Spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration in larch plantation in Shanxi Plateau. Environmental Science, 2015, 36 (5): 1793- 1801.
doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.05.039 |
|
杨晶晶, 陈 闻, 袁 媛, 等. 2020. 模拟增温对羊草生态系统土壤呼吸速率的影响. 生态学报, 40(17): 6202−6214. | |
Yang J J, Chen W, Yuan Y, et al, 2020. Effects of simulated warming on soil respiration rate of Leymus chinensis grassland ecosystem. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(17): 6202−6214. [in Chinese] | |
杨 林, 陈亚梅, 和润莲, 等 高山森林土壤微生物群落结构和功能对模拟增温的响应. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27 (9): 2855- 2863. | |
Yang L, Chen Y M, He R L, et al Responses of soil microbial community structure and function to simulated warming in alpine forest. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27 (9): 2855- 2863. | |
杨 扬, 张喜亭, 肖 路, 等 火灾恢复年限对大兴安岭森林乔灌草多样性及优势种影响. 植物研究, 2019, 39 (4): 514- 520.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.04.005 |
|
Yang Y, Zhang X T, Xiao L, et al Effect of forest-fire rehabilitation time on plant diversity in Daxing’an Mountains, Northeastern China. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39 (4): 514- 520.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.04.005 |
|
张德强, 孙晓敏, 周国逸, 等 南亚热带森林土壤CO2排放的季节动态及其对环境变化的响应 . 中国科学. D辑:地球科学, 2006, (S1): 130- 138. | |
Zhang D Q, Sun X M, Zhou G Y, et al Seasonal dynamics of soil CO2 emission from subtropical forests and its response to environmental change . Science in Chinese Ser. D:Earth Sciences, 2006, (S1): 130- 138. | |
张云宇, 孙晓凤, 张临峰, 等 帽儿山温带落叶阔叶林细根生物量、生产力和周转率. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32 (9): 3053- 3060.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.001 |
|
Zhang Y Y, Sun X F, Zhang L F, et al Responses of fine root biomass to diameters of and distances to the neighboring trees of Fraxinus mandschurica plantation with different stocking densities . Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32 (9): 3053- 3060.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202109.001 |
|
赵小娜, 秦晓娟, 董 刚, 等 庞泉沟自然保护区植物群落分类学多样性. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25 (12): 3437- 3442.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140925.003 |
|
Zhao X N, Qin X J, Dong G. et al Axonomic diversity of plant communities in Pangquangou Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25 (12): 3437- 3442.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140925.003 |
|
郑鹏飞, 余新晓, 贾国栋, 等 北京山区不同植被类型的土壤呼吸特征及其温度敏感性. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30 (5): 1726- 1734.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.038 |
|
Zheng P F, Yu X X, Jia G D, et al Soil respiration characteristics and temperature sensitivity of different vegetation types in mountainous areas of Beijing. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30 (5): 1726- 1734.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.038 |
|
Atkin O K, Edwards E J, Lovers B R Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming. New Phytologist, 2000, 147 (1): 141- 154.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00683.x |
|
Atkin O K, Tjoelker M G Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends in Plant Science, 2003, 8 (7): 343- 351.
doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00136-5 |
|
Carey J C, Tang J W, Templer P H Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113 (48): 13797- 13802.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605365113 |
|
Davidson E A, Janssens I A. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440(7081): 165−173. | |
Grant R F, Rochette P Soil microbial respiration at different water potentials and temperatures: Theory and Mathematical Modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58 (6): 1681- 1690.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800060015x |
|
Hopkins F M, Filley T R, Gleixner G, et al Increased belowground carbon inputs and warming promote loss of soil organic carbon through complementary microbial responses. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 76, 57- 69.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.028 |
|
IPCC. 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. | |
Klimek B, Choczy M, Juszkiewicz A, et al. 2009. Scots Pine( Pinus sylvestris L.) roots and soil moisture did not affect soil thermal sensitivity. European Journal of Soil Biology, 45 (5 /6) : 442−447. | |
Li J Q, Pei J M, Pendall E, et al Spatial heterogeneity of temperature sensitivity of soil respiration: a globalanalysis of field observations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 141, 107675. | |
Litvak M, Miller S, Wofsy S C, et al. 2003. Effect of stand age on whole ecosystem CO2 exchange in the Canadian boreal forest. Journal of Geophysical Research,108, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000854. | |
Luo Y Q, Wan S Q, Hui D F, et al Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie. Nature, 2001, 413 (6856): 622- 625.
doi: 10.1038/35098065 |
|
Moyano F E, Kutsch W L, Rebmann C Soil respiration fluxes in relation to photosynthetic activity in broad-leaf and needle-leaf forest stands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 148 (1): 135- 143. | |
Payeur-Poirier J L, Coursolle C, Margolis H A, et al CO2 fluxes of a boreal black spruce chronosequence in eastern North America . Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 153, 94- 105.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.009 |
|
Qi Y, Xu M, Wu J G Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration and its effects on ecosystem carbon budget: nonlinearity begets surprises. Ecological Modelling, 2002, 153 (1): 131- 142. | |
Sun L J, Mioko A, Yuji K, et al Relationship between fine-root exudation and respiration of two Quercus species in a Japanese temperate forest . Tree physiology, 2017, 37 (8): 1011- 1020.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx026 |
|
Wang X, Liu L L, Piao S L, et al Soil respiration under climate warming: differential response of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20 (10): 3229- 3237.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.12620 |
|
Xu Z F, Tang S S, Xiong L, et al Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in China’s forest ecosystems: patterns and controls. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 93, 105- 110.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.04.008 |
|
Zheng Z M, Yu G R, Fu Y L, et al Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration is affected by prevailing climatic conditions and soil organic carbon content: a trans-China based case study. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41 (7): 1531- 1540.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.013 |
|
Zou J L, Tobin B, Luo Y Q, et al Response of soil respiration and its components to experimental warming and water addition in a temperate Sitka spruce forest ecosystem. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 260−261, 204- 215.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.06.020 |
[1] | 张玮,何玉友,郭子武,汪舍平,陈双林. 失管毛竹林演替过程中乔木树种群落结构和多样性特征[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(12): 12-20. |
[2] | 胡宗达,刘世荣,刘兴良,罗明霞,胡璟,李亚非,余昊,欧定华,吴德勇. 川西亚高山3种天然次生林土壤有机碳氮组分特征[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(11): 1-11. |
[3] | 张晓红,张会儒,卢军,雷相东. 目标树抚育间伐对蒙古栎天然次生林生长的初期影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(10): 83-92. |
[4] | 张雷, 孙鹏森, 刘世荣. 川西亚高山森林不同恢复阶段生长季蒸腾特征[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(1): 1-9. |
[5] | 陈秀波, 朱德全, 赵晨晨, 张路路, 陈立新, 段文标. 凉水国家自然保护区不同林型红松林土壤nosZ型反硝化微生物群落组成和多样性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 106-117. |
[6] | 陈金磊, 方晰, 辜翔, 李雷达, 刘兆丹, 王留芳, 张仕吉. 中亚热带2种森林群落组成、结构及区系特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 159-172. |
[7] | 张晓,刘世荣,黄永涛,傅声雷. 辽东栎林演替过程中的土壤细菌群落结构和多样性变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(10): 193-202. |
[8] | 冯琦雅, 陈超凡, 覃林, 何亚婷, 王鹏, 段艺璇, 王雅菲, 何友均. 不同经营模式对蒙古栎天然次生林林分结构和植物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(1): 12-21. |
[9] | 张玲, 张东来, 毛子军. 小兴安岭阔叶红松林不同演替系列土壤有机碳及各组分特征[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9): 11-17. |
[10] | 刘伟玮, 刘某承, 李文华, 曾凡顺, 曲艺. 落叶松-人参复合系统的植物多样性和碳储量特征[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 124-132. |
[11] | 冯广, 艾训儒, 姚兰, 刘峻城, 黄永涛, 林勇. 鄂西南亚热带常绿落叶阔叶混交林的自然恢复动态及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(8): 1-9. |
[12] | 范垚城, 覃林, 王雅菲, 邹慧, 谭玲, 何友均. 东北天然次生林不同经营模式下土壤微生物碳源利用与功能多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7): 68-77. |
[13] | 吴恒, 党坤良, 田相林, 孙帅超, 陈书军, 赵鹏祥, 曹田健. 秦岭林区天然次生林与人工林立地质量评价[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(4): 78-88. |
[14] | 张明霞, 王得祥, 康冰, 张岗岗, 刘璞, 杜焰玲, 于飞. 秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1): 12-21. |
[15] | 玉宝, 张秋良, 王立明. 中幼龄兴安落叶松过伐林垂直结构综合特征[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1): 132-139. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||