林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (8): 129-143.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250648
收稿日期:2025-10-29
修回日期:2026-03-02
出版日期:2026-08-10
发布日期:2026-08-20
通讯作者:
谢普军,黄立新
E-mail:pujunxie@caf.ac.cn;l_x_huang@163.com
基金资助:
Yuechao Zhang,Pujun Xie*(
),Caihong Zhang,Yejun Deng,Xiang Wang,Lixin Huang*(
)
Received:2025-10-29
Revised:2026-03-02
Online:2026-08-10
Published:2026-08-20
Contact:
Pujun Xie,Lixin Huang
E-mail:pujunxie@caf.ac.cn;l_x_huang@163.com
摘要:
目的: 开发一种高效、低成本的多酚提取放大工艺,系统评估其提取动力学、经济可行性及其多酚提取物的紫外吸收和酪氨酸酶抑制活性等光保护行为,为推动油橄榄果渣多酚的工厂回收利用和化妆品产品的产业化应用提供理论指导。方法: 以乙醇为提取溶剂,采用加热回流法提取油橄榄果渣多酚;通过单因素试验和Box-Behnken响应面法优化提取工艺参数(提取时间、温度、料液比、乙醇体积分数),并在优化工艺条件下进一步开展提取放大试验,基于菲克扩散模型、一级动力学和二级动力学等多模型拟合放大提取过程,分析油橄榄果渣总多酚及其含有的羟基酪醇、酪醇等8种单体多酚的溶出规律;采用生命周期成本分析方法核算规模化放大生产的平准化生产成本;测定油橄榄多酚提取物的防晒因子(SPF)值和酪氨酸酶抑制活性,同时探究其多酚提取物中二元单体多酚组合的光保护功效协同效应。结果: 油橄榄果渣多酚的优化提取工艺为:乙醇体积分数70%、料液比1∶25 g·mL?1、提取温度98 ℃、提取时间77 min,该条件下多酚实际得率达5.67 mg·g?1,与模型预测值(5.81 mg·g?1)相对误差仅2.4%,模型拟合度高(R2>0.9,P<0.000 1);动力学分析表明,不同多酚溶出规律存在显著区别:酪醇和丁香酸的提取规律最符合菲克扩散模型(R2>0.97),芦丁和木犀草素的提取规律最符合一级动力学模型(R2>0.97),而二级动力学模型最能准确反映羟基酪醇、绿原酸、咖啡酸、橄榄苦苷及总多酚的提取规律(R2>0.92);成本效益核算显示,通过将料液比降至1∶10、乙醇体积分数降至10%,多酚单位生产成本从每千克330元降至每千克92元,且得率仍保持4.21 mg·g?1;功能活性方面,在优化条件下创制的多酚提取物(1.0 mg·mL?1)具有显著的防晒功能(SPF值15.21)和酪氨酸酶抑制活性(72.14%),成本优化后多酚提取物SPF值仅下降7.2%(14.12),且酪氨酸酶抑制率仍保持较高水平(61.11%);此外,木犀草素在光保护协同效应中作用关键(如与橄榄苦苷5∶1组合,SPF=11.95,SE=10.39),而阿魏酸与羟基酪醇(4∶3)在酪氨酸酶抑制方面协同效应最强(抑制率72.95%,SE=1.79)。结论: 本研究成功开发能够降本增效的油橄榄果渣多酚提取工艺,具有显著的工业化应用潜力和市场竞争力;创制的油橄榄果渣多酚提取物具备良好的防晒和美白功效,为林源多酚化妆品的创新研发提供了研究基础。
中图分类号:
张跃超,谢普军,张彩虹,邓叶俊,王翔,黄立新. 油橄榄果渣多酚提取放大动力学和成本效益及其提取物光保护作用[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(8): 129-143.
Yuechao Zhang,Pujun Xie,Caihong Zhang,Yejun Deng,Xiang Wang,Lixin Huang. Kinetics and Cost-Effectiveness of Polyphenol Extraction and Magnification from Olive Pomace and the Photoprotective Effects of Its Extracts[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(8): 129-143.
表3
Box-Behnken试验方案及结果①"
| 试验号 Test number | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | 多酚得率Polyphenol yield/(mg·g?1) |
| 1 | –1 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 3.109 |
| 2 | 1 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 4.131 |
| 3 | –1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.372 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.359 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | –1 | –1 | 3.775 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | –1 | 4.973 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | –1 | 1 | 2.905 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.212 |
| 9 | –1 | 0 | 0 | –1 | 4.558 |
| 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | –1 | 4.935 |
| 11 | –1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.541 |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.897 |
| 13 | 0 | –1 | –1 | 0 | 3.804 |
| 14 | 0 | 1 | –1 | 0 | 3.327 |
| 15 | 0 | –1 | 1 | 0 | 3.247 |
| 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5.544 |
| 17 | –1 | 0 | –1 | 0 | 3.703 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | –1 | 0 | 3.937 |
| 19 | –1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.641 |
| 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5.222 |
| 21 | 0 | –1 | 0 | –1 | 4.307 |
| 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | –1 | 4.989 |
| 23 | 0 | –1 | 0 | 1 | 2.789 |
| 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3.566 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.728 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.568 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.712 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.651 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.648 |
表4
以多酚收率为响应值的方差分析①"
| 方差来源 Source of variance | 总方差 Total square deviation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方差 Mean square deviation | F | P | 显著性 Significance |
| Model | 18.46 | 14 | 1.32 | 84.00 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X1 | 2.57 | 1 | 2.57 | 163.91 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X2 | 2.77 | 1 | 2.77 | 176.71 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X3 | 1.60 | 1 | 1.60 | 102.20 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X4 | 6.20 | 1 | 6.20 | 395.04 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X1X2 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.890 9 | ns |
| X1X3 | 0.45 | 1 | 0.45 | 28.89 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X1X4 | 0.24 | 1 | 0.24 | 15.26 | 0.001 6 | ** |
| X2X3 | 1.92 | 1 | 1.92 | 122.53 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X2X4 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.710 3 | ns |
| X3X4 | 0.20 | 1 | 0.20 | 12.64 | 0.003 2 | ** |
| X12 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.14 | 9.12 | 0.009 2 | ** |
| X22 | 0.43 | 1 | 0.43 | 27.11 | 0.000 1 | ** |
| X32 | 1.11 | 1 | 1.11 | 70.44 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| X42 | 1.74 | 1 | 1.74 | 110.98 | < 0.000 1 | ** |
| 残差 Residual error | 0.22 | 14 | ||||
| 失拟误差 Misfit error | 0.20 | 10 | 5.09 | ns | ||
| 纯误差 Pure error | 0.02 | 4 | ||||
| 总离差 Total dispersion | 18.68 | 28 |
表5
提取动力学试验结果"
| 时间 Time/min | 多酚得率 Polyphenol yield/ (mg·g?1) | 羟基酪醇 Hydroxytyrosol/ (μg·g?1) | 酪醇 Tyrosol/ (μg·g?1) | 丁香酸 Syringic acid/ (μg·g?1) | 绿原酸 Chlorogenic acid/ (μg·g?1) | 咖啡酸 Caffeic acid/ (μg·g?1) | 芦丁 Rutin/ (μg·g?1) | 橄榄苦苷 Oleuropein/ (μg·g?1) | 木犀草素 Luteolin/ (μg·g?1) |
| 5 | 1.85 | 6.61 | 168.52 | 0.14 | 176.12 | 8.39 | 230.26 | 724.64 | 67.39 |
| 10 | 1.87 | 6.19 | 175.19 | 4.46 | 178.81 | 9.63 | 224.79 | 726.62 | 74.47 |
| 15 | 2.89 | 28.67 | 290.14 | 64.68 | 235.65 | 41.04 | 304.53 | 193.87 | |
| 30 | 3.29 | 51.29 | 446.84 | 178.20 | 267.63 | 49.75 | 681.53 | 271.14 | |
| 60 | 4.84 | 54.19 | 594.07 | 256.37 | 344.94 | 63.58 | 941.02 | 433.29 | |
| 77 | 4.92 | 57.80 | 608.26 | 259.46 | 353.85 | 66.88 | 978.73 | 458.07 | |
| 90 | 5.10 | 58.08 | 609.85 | 260.22 | 370.88 | 68.79 | 472.78 | ||
| 120 | 5.10 | 60.98 | 613.09 | 262.93 | 380.66 | 69.03 | 481.22 |
图4
油橄榄多酚提取动力学拟合曲线 A:菲克扩散模型的模拟曲线;B:总多酚得率的一级二级动力学模型的模拟曲线;C、D、E、F、G、H、I、J:8个图分别为8种多酚得率的一级二级动力学模型的模拟曲线。A: Simulation curve of Fick diffusion model; B: Simulation curve of first-order and second-order kinetic model of total polyphenol yield; C, D, E, F, G, H, I and J: The 8 figures show the simulation curve of the first-order and second-order kinetic models for the yield of 8 kinds of polyphenol."
表6
总多酚及8种多酚的提取动力学模型"
| 项目Items | 菲克扩散模型 Fick diffusion model | 一级动力学 First-order kinetics | 二级动力学 Second-order kinetics | 二级动力学t/Ct与t的线性形式 The second-order kinetics t/Ctt and the linear form of |
| 总多酚Total polyphenols | y=0.041x+0.032,R2=0.978 | y=51.00×(1?e?0.057t), R2=0.965 | y=0.164x+3.346,R 2=0.984 | |
| 羟基酪醇Hydroxytyrosol | y =0.036x +0.047,R2=0.928 | y=69.23×(1?e?0.028t), R 2=0.903 | y=0.012x+0.425,R 2=0.923 | |
| 酪醇Tyrosol | y =0.064x -0.341,R2=0.987 | y=628.43×(1?e?0.042t), R 2=0.984 | y= | |
| 丁香酸Syringic acid | y =0.061x -0.548,R2=0.972 | y=305.29×(1?e?0.022t), R 2=0.928 | y=0.002x+0.132,R 2=0.830 | |
| 绿原酸Chlorogenic acid | y =0.034x+0.293,R2=0.974 | y=385.20×(1?e?0.060t), R 2=0.790 | y=0.002x+0.028,R 2=0.996 | |
| 咖啡酸Caffeic acid | y =0.059x-0.418,R2=0.935 | y=70.88×(1?e?0.038t), R 2=0.937 | y=0.011x+0.331,R 2=0.945 | |
| 芦丁Rutin | y =0.038x-0.175,R2=0.964 | y= R 2=0.978 | y=0.017x+0.640,R 2=0.959 | |
| 橄榄苦苷Oleuropein | y =0.035x+0.051,R2=0.974 | y= R 2=0.943 | y=0.005x+0.109,R 2=0.991 | |
| 木犀草素Luteolin | y =0.047x-0.344,R2=0.982 | y=519.18×(1?e?0.026t), R 2=0.983 | y=0.037x+1.479,R 2=0.983 |
表7
油橄榄果渣多酚提取物提取工艺成本核算(以生产1 kg为基准)"
| 成本项目Cost items | 计算依据与消耗量Calculation basis and consumption | 单价Unit price | 价格说明Price description |
| 油橄榄果渣 Olive pomace | 5 kg | 3 yuan·kg?1 | 原材料采购的预估市场价 Estimated market price for raw material purchases |
| 无水乙醇 Absolute alcohol | 87.5 L | 4.4 yuan·L?1 | 大宗工业级溶剂的市场采购价 Market purchase price of bulk industrial grade solvents |
| 水Water | 37.5 L | 根据中国水网可知水费价格大概为1.97 yuan·m?3 Water price is about 1.97 yuan·m?3 according to China 's water network | |
| 电力(提取、浓缩、干燥)Electricity ( extraction, concentration, drying ) | 30 kWh | 0.8 650 yuan·(kWh)?1 | 耗电量(每5 kg果渣30 kWh)是基于设备功率和运行时间的工艺估算,根据国家电网,工业用电为0.8 650 yuan·(kWh)?1 This power consumption (30 kWh per 5 kg of pomace ) is based on process estimation of equipment power and running time. The industrial electricity price is 0.865 0 yuan·(kWh)?1 according to the State Grid |
| 人工操作及维护Manual operation and maintenance | 按年产200 t分摊(人工成本为50 yuan·kg?1,维护成本 1.5 yuan·kg?1)Amortized at an annual output of 200 tons ( labor costs 50 yuan·kg?1, maintenance costs 1.5 yuan·kg?1 ) | 51.5 yuan·kg?1 | 固定成本的分摊Allocation of fixed costs 人工成本(50 yuan·kg?1):基于生产线所需的操作和管理的工资、福利等,按年总人工费用分摊到200 t年产量上得出,具体见 维护成本(1.5 yuan·kg?1):指日常的设备保养、巡检、小零件更换等常规维护费用,同样按年产量分摊 Labor cost (50 yuan·kg?1): based on the operation and management of the production line required wages, benefits, etc., according to the total annual labor costs allocated to 200 tons of annual output. The specific calculation is shown in supplemental table 1. Maintenance cost (1.5 yuan·kg?1): refers to the daily equipment maintenance, inspection, small parts replacement and other conventional maintenance costs, also allocated according to annual output |
| 设备维护、耗材、管理等Equipment maintenance, consumables, management, etc. | 按CAPEX的2%年费率估算并分摊Estimated and apportioned at CAPEX 's 2% annual rate | 1.67 yuan·kg?1 | 固定资产和综合管理费的分摊Allocation of fixed assets and comprehensive management fees 将项目总投资(CAPEX,即设备、厂房等固定资产)按2%的年费率(涵盖设备折旧、大修基金、保险、财务成本等)估算出年度总费用,再分摊到200 t的年产量上,得到每千克的成本The total investment of the project (CAPEX, equipment, plant and other fixed assets) is estimated at an annual rate of 2% (covering equipment depreciation, overhaul fund, insurance, financial cost, etc.) to estimate the total annual cost, and then apportioned to the annual output of 200 tons to obtain the cost per kilogram |
| 总成本Total cost | 565.66 yuan·kg?1 | (5 kg果渣成本+87.5 L乙醇成本+30 kWh电力成本)/1.167 kg产品+人工及维护成本+设备管理等成本=(15+385+26)/1.167+51.5+1.67≈418.21 yuan·kg?1 (5 kg pomace cost+87.5 L ethanol cost+30 kWh power cost)/1.167 kg product + labor and maintenance cost+equipment management cost=(15+385+26)/ 1.167+51.5+1.67≈418.21 yuan·kg?1 |
表8
油橄榄果渣提取物两种多酚的组合的SPF值及酪氨酸酶抑制率"
| 二元光保护剂组合 Binary Photoprotective agent combination | 摩尔比 Molar ratio | SPF值 SPF value | 协同效应值 Synergistic effect value | 相互作用 Interaction | 酪氨酸酶抑制率 Tyrosinase inhibition rate (%) | 协同效应值 Synergistic effect value | 相互作用 Interaction | |
| 橄榄苦苷 Oleuropein | 羟基酪醇Hydroxytyrosol | 10∶1 | 1.35±0.02 | 1.70 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 77.46±2.12 | 1.58 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect |
| 酪醇Tyrosol | 2∶1 | 0.73±0.03 | 0.57 | 拮抗效应 Antagonistic effect | 64.19±0.35 | 1.20 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 阿魏酸Ferulic acid | 8∶1 | 1.17±0.11 | 0.27 | 拮抗效应 Antagonistic effect | 68.70±0.35 | 1.41 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 丁香酸Syringic acid | 10∶1 | 1.06±0.03 | 0.95 | 相加效应 Additive effect | 64.23±1.27 | 1.28 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 槲皮素Quercetin | 5∶1 | 5.05±0.26 | 3.56 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 68.45±2.12 | 1.36 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 阿魏酸 Ferulic acid | 木犀草素Luteolin | 5∶1 | 11.95±0.45 | 10.39 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 66.44±0.15 | 1.35 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect |
| 酪醇Tyrosol | 1∶4 | 5.77±0.36 | 1.10 | 相加效应 Additive effect | 66.44±1.42 | 1.27 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 木犀草素Luteolin | 2∶3 | 9.64±0.33 | 1.81 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 54.17±1.77 | 1.24 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 羟基酪醇Hydroxytyrosol | 4∶3 | 7.57±0.47 | 1.44 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 72.95±1.04 | 1.79 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
| 槲皮素 Quercetin | 木犀草素Luteolin | 1∶1 | 10.70±0.62 | 5.22 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 61.19±3.19 | 1.20 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect |
| 羟基酪醇Hydroxytyrosol | 2∶1 | 3.21±0.15 | 2.33 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | 58.70±2.20 | 1.18 | 协同效应 Synergistic effect | |
表S1
人工成本计算说明"
| 项目Item | 直接工人成本(81人) Direct worker cost (81 people)/yuan | 间接人员成本(9人) Indirect personnel costs (9 people)/yuan | 计算说明Calculation description |
| 月基本工资Monthly basic salary | 486 000 | 72 000 | 直接工人:6 000元/人 Direct worker: 6 000 yuan/per 间接人员:8 000元/人 Indirect personnel: 8 000 yuan per person |
| 加班费Overtime pay | 50 000 | 0 | 按法定标准计算 Calculated according to statutory standards |
| 绩效奖金Performance bonus | 25 000 | 5 000 | 与产量/质量挂钩 Linked to output/quality |
| 小计(薪酬)Subtotal (salary ) | 561 000 | 77 000 | |
| 社保公积金(公司部分) Social security provident fund (company part ) | 56 100 | 7 700 | 按薪酬的10%估算(比例因地区而异) Estimated at 10% of salary (the proportion varies by region) |
| 餐费交通补贴Meal traffic subsidy | 40 500 | 4 500 | 直接工人:500元/人 Direct worker: 500 yuan per person 间接人员:500元/人 Indirect personnel: 500 yuan per person |
| 招聘培训分摊 Recruitment and training allocation | 10 000 | 2 000 | 按年度总费用按月分摊 Amortize the total annual cost on a monthly basis |
| 小计(间接成本)Subtotal (indirect costs) | 106 600 | 14 200 | |
| 该班组月总人工成本 Total monthly labor cost of the team | 667 600 | 91 200 |
|
邓 娜, 乔 沈, 高 芯, 等. 响应面试验优化石榴皮多酚提取工艺及石榴不同部位多酚的抗氧化活性分析. 食品科学, 2016, 37 (6): 39- 43.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201606007 |
|
|
Deng N, Qiao S, Gao X, et al. Optimization of extraction process of polyphenols from pomegranate peel by response surface methodology and antioxidant activity analysis of polyphenols in different parts of pomegranate fruit. Food Science, 2016, 37 (6): 39- 43.
doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201606007 |
|
| 丁莎莎. 2017. 油橄榄果渣膳食纤维的制备、特性及改性研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. | |
| Ding S S. 2017. Preparation, properties and modification of dietary fiber from olive pomace. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences. [in Chinese] | |
| 王安华, 龙国清, 王东东, 等. 油橄榄果渣中多酚提取及活性研究进展. 食品研究与开发, 2021, 42 (5): 219- 224. | |
| Wang A H, Long G Q, Wang D D, et al. Research progress on extraction and activities of polyphenols from Olea europaea fruit residue. Food Research and Development, 2021, 42 (5): 219- 224. | |
| 王成章, 陈 强, 罗建军, 等. 中国油橄榄发展历程与产业展望. 生物质化学工程, 2013, 47 (2): 41- 46. | |
| Wang C Z, Chen Q, Luo J J, et al. Development and industrial prospect of China’s olive. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2013, 47 (2): 41- 46. | |
| 王 芳, 白万明. 陇南市油橄榄果渣利用现状分析. 甘肃林业科技, 2024, 49 (2): 89- 93. | |
| Wang F, Bai W M. Analysis of the pomace utilization status of olive in Longnan City. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 2024, 49 (2): 89- 93. | |
| 王璐馨. 2022. 油茶壳提取物的美白功效初探. 杭州: 浙江大学. | |
| Wang L X. 2022. Study on the whitening effect of Camellia oleifera shell extract. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University. [in Chinese] | |
|
王晓杰, 黄立新, 张彩虹, 等. 油橄榄叶提取物的制备及理化性质研究. 林产化学与工业, 2019, 39 (4): 83- 90.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2417.2019.04.012 |
|
|
Wang X J, Huang L X, Zhang C H, et al. Preparation and physicochemical properties of olive leaf extract. Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products, 2019, 39 (4): 83- 90.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2417.2019.04.012 |
|
| 王志宏. 2018. 油橄榄果渣多酚活性物制备及其生物活性研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院. | |
| Wang Z H. 2018. Study on preparation and biological activity of polyphenol actives from olive pomace. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry. [in Chinese] | |
|
魏玉萍, 赵 岩, 宋丽军, 等. 超声波辅助DES提取肉苁蓉多酚的工艺优化、动力学及抗氧化活性研究. 食品工业科技, 2023, 44 (16): 246- 254.
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022100230 |
|
|
Wei Y P, Zhao Y, Song L J, et al. Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted DES extraction process, kinetics and antioxidant activity of Cistanche tubulosa polyphenols. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44 (16): 246- 254.
doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022100230 |
|
| 张 怡, 张 煜, 刘 攀, 等. 闪式提取辣椒渣黄酮及总酚的工艺研究. 食品工业科技, 2014, 35 (3): 245- 248. | |
| Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Liu P, et al. Study on flavonoid and total phenol extraction from Capsicum residual by blitzkrieg extraction. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2014, 35 (3): 245- 248. | |
| 郑依凡. 2016. 微生物油脂的分离提取工艺研究. 北京: 北京化工大学. | |
| Zheng Y F. 2016. Research on separation and extraction process of microbial oil. Beijing: Beijing University of Chemical Technology. [in Chinese] | |
|
Albahari P, Jug M, Radić K, et al. Characterization of olive pomace extract obtained by cyclodextrin-enhanced pulsed ultrasound assisted extraction. LWT, 2018, 92, 22- 31.
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.02.011 |
|
|
Ali A, Lim X Y, Chong C H, et al. Ultrasound-assisted extraction of natural antioxidants from betel leaves (Piper betle): extraction kinetics and modeling. Separation Science and Technology, 2018, 53 (14): 2192- 2205.
doi: 10.1080/01496395.2018.1443137 |
|
|
Deng Y, Wang W J, Liu D H. Ultrasound-assisted accelerated penetration extraction of polyphenols from pomegranate peels: enhanced mass transfer by calcium ion precipitation and utilization of Fick’s law. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2024, 17 (4): 1017- 1029.
doi: 10.1007/s11947-023-03181-3 |
|
| Dilucia F, Rutigliano M, Libutti A, et al. 2023. Effect of a novel pretreatment before freeze-drying process on the antioxidant activity and polyphenol content of Malva sylvestris L., Calendula officinalis L., and Asparagus officinalis L. infusions. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 16(10): 2113–2125. | |
|
Expósito-Almellón X, Munguía-Ubierna Á, Duque-Soto C, et al. Optimized ultrasound-assisted extraction for enhanced recovery of valuable phenolic compounds from olive by-products. Antioxidants, 2025, 14 (8): 938.
doi: 10.3390/antiox14080938 |
|
|
Galanakis C M, Tsatalas P, Galanakis I M. Phenols from olive mill wastewater and other natural antioxidants as UV filters in sunscreens. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2018, 9, 160- 168.
doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2017.12.002 |
|
|
Han C L, Yang Z W, Chen X Q, et al. Ultrasound-assisted natural deep eutectic solvents extraction of flavonoids from Hippophae rhamnoides: Optimization and kinetics studies. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2025, 211, 110244.
doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2025.110244 |
|
|
Khanzada B, Akhtar N, ul haq I, et al. Polyphenol assisted nano-reinforced chitosan films with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocolloids, 2024, 153, 110010.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110010 |
|
|
Latif A, Khan M I, Latif A, et al. Enhancing polyphenol extraction from white button mushrooms using microwave-assisted extraction: a response surface methodology optimization approach. Microchemical Journal, 2024, 203, 110876.
doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2024.110876 |
|
|
Lazar L, Talmaciu A I, Volf I, et al. Kinetic modeling of the ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenols from Picea abies bark. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2016, 32, 191- 197.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.009 |
|
|
Lissaneddine A, Mandi L, El Achaby M, et al. Performance and dynamic modeling of a continuously operated pomace olive packed bed for olive mill wastewater treatment and phenol recovery. Chemosphere, 2021, 280, 130797.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130797 |
|
|
Luís Â, Duarte A P, Pereira L, et al. Interactions between the major bioactive polyphenols of berries: effects on antioxidant properties. European Food Research and Technology, 2018, 244 (1): 175- 185.
doi: 10.1007/s00217-017-2948-5 |
|
|
Neviani M, Aliakbarian B, Perego P, et al. Extraction of polyphenols from olive pomace: mathematical modeling and technological feasibility in a high temperature and high pressure stirred reactor. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2019, 141, 32- 46.
doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2018.10.033 |
|
|
Pereira S G, Martins A A, Mata T M, et al. Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of innovative agar extraction technologies from red seaweeds. Bioresource Technology, 2024, 414, 131649.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131649 |
|
| Pogorzelska-Nowicka E, Hanula M, Pogorzelski G. 2024. Extraction of polyphenols and essential oils from herbs with green extraction methods–an insightful review. Food Chemistry, 460(Pt 1): 140456. | |
|
Rahmalia W, Dasilia C, Usman T, et al. Astaxanthin and omega-3-rich oil from fermented Acetes (cincalok) and its application as bioactive additive and sunscreen in lotion. Oilseeds & Fats Crops and Lipids, 2022, 29 (18): 8.
doi: 10.1051/ocl/2022012 |
|
|
Rodríguez-Aguilar F, Ortega-Regules A E, Ramírez-Rodrigues M M. Influence of time-temperature in the antioxidant activity, anthocyanin and polyphenols profile, and color of Ardisia compressa K. extracts, with the addition of sucrose or citric acid. Food Chemistry, 2024, 440, 138181.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.138181 |
|
|
Tapia-Quirós P, miR-Cerdà A, Granados M, et al. From waste to resource: exploring green approaches for phenolics recovery from olive leaves. Antioxidants, 2025, 14 (2): 136.
doi: 10.3390/antiox14020136 |
|
|
Torun M, Dincer C, Topuz A, et al. Aqueous extraction kinetics of soluble solids, phenolics and flavonoids from sage (Salvia fruticosa Miller) leaves. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2015, 52 (5): 2797- 2805.
doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1308-8 |
|
|
Wang W X, Yang J B, Yang J. Optimization of ultrasound-assisted aqueous two phase extraction of polyphenols from olive leaves. Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology, 2021, 51 (8): 821- 831.
doi: 10.1080/10826068.2020.1861012 |
|
|
Zhang Y, Zhang C H, Xu C, et al. Effect of geographical location and soil fertility on main phenolic compounds and fatty acids compositions of virgin olive oil from Leccino cultivar in China. Food Research International, 2022, 157, 111207.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111207 |
|
|
Zhao Y Q, Tran K, Brennan M, et al. Kinetics of ultrasonic extraction of polyphenols, anthocyanins and tannins from five different New Zealand grape pomaces. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2021, 56 (6): 2687- 2695.
doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14898 |
| [1] | 赵洪刚,孙玮鸿,梁鹏鹏,赵梓旭,孙建平,乐磊. 基于响应面法激光切削柞木效果[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(8): 172-179. |
| [2] | 熊小倩,胡德夫,刘宝庆,李凯. 陕西凤县林麝不同养殖模式的成本收益分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(12): 101-112. |
| [3] | 李娜, 姜永新, 李美娟, 罗旭璐, 刘云, 阚欢, 张加研, 赵平. 思茅松树皮多聚原花青素降解优化[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2): 110-116. |
| [4] | 李红军, 周国英, 路宗岩, 谭益民, 段爱国. 杉木炭疽病拮抗菌HY32的发酵条件优化[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(12): 94-100. |
| [5] | 金浩;唐丽荣;曾巧玲;郑新宇;林冠烽;黄彪. 炭陶除氟吸附材料的研制[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(4): 147-151. |
| [6] | 张治军;张小全 朱建华 罗云建 侯振宏 褚金翔. 广西主要人工林类型固碳成本核算[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(3): 16-22. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||