林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 205-215.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250713
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
张正宇1,2,范雅倩3,孙琪3,段巧丽3,韩莹莹2,鲍伟东1,2,*(
)
收稿日期:2025-11-26
修回日期:2026-04-12
出版日期:2026-06-10
发布日期:2026-06-13
通讯作者:
鲍伟东
E-mail:wdbao@bjfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Zhengyu Zhang1,2,Yaqian Fan3,Qi Sun3,Qiaoli Duan3,Yingying Han2,Weidong Bao1,2,*(
)
Received:2025-11-26
Revised:2026-04-12
Online:2026-06-10
Published:2026-06-13
Contact:
Weidong Bao
E-mail:wdbao@bjfu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 针对2022年北京冬奥会延庆赛区建设因村落搬迁导致流浪犬入侵北京松山国家级自然保护区的问题,探讨流浪犬入侵对保护区内6种主要野生动物的干扰,阐明大型工程建设可能诱发的突发性生物安全风险及其生态连锁反应,为未来类似情景下的生态风险预警和系统防护提供科学参考。方法: 基于2021—2023年红外相机监测数据,采用时空生态位建模法和非参数核密度估算法,分析流浪犬活动对野生动物的出现是否产生影响。结果: 流浪犬种群呈现阶段性空间扩散特征,场馆建设和赛事期间多活动于赛区及其周边,赛事结束后流浪犬向保护区深处持续扩散。流浪犬呈现高度稳定的双峰型[09:00—12:00和20:00—02:00(次日)]活动节律。在流浪犬活动区域,狍的活动由单峰型(08:00—12:00)变为双峰型(06:00—10:00和17:00—19:00);中华斑羚的活动由单峰型(18:00—22:00)变为2022年双峰型(05:00—09:00和17:00—19:00)并在2023年明显收窄(05:00—07:00和14:00—17:00);野猪表现出午后(14:00—20:00)活动偏好;貉的活动高峰期由2021年23:00—02:00(次日)变为2022年的20:00—03:00,2023年因貉的出现概率锐减而无法区分活动节律;雉鸡的活动高峰期由2021年的06:00—10:00和14:00—17:00变为2022年的05:00—09:00和13:00—16:00,2023年进一步变为06:00—10:00和14:00—19:00;勺鸡的活动高峰期由2021年的15:00—19:00变为2023年的06:00—11:00。结论: 北京松山国家级自然保护区野生动物活动受流浪犬影响呈现出明显的时间累积效应,野生动物的生存空间随流浪犬活动区域扩大而不断压缩,野生动物原有活动节律被迫调整。为缓解流浪犬对保护区内野生动物持续且渐进的胁迫,制定并实施科学、人道的管理策略成为保护区的一项紧迫任务。
中图分类号:
张正宇,范雅倩,孙琪,段巧丽,韩莹莹,鲍伟东. 北京松山国家级自然保护区流浪犬入侵对野生动物活动节律的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(6): 205-215.
Zhengyu Zhang,Yaqian Fan,Qi Sun,Qiaoli Duan,Yingying Han,Weidong Bao. Impact of Stray Dogs on the Activity Rhythms of Wildlife in Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(6): 205-215.
表1
北京松山国家级自然保护区2021—2023年流浪犬拍摄情况"
| 区域 Areas | 年份 Year | 有记录相机台数 Number of cameras with records | 有记录相机 点位比例 Proportion of camera sites with records (%) | 独立有效事 件次数 Number of independent events | 单位相机日均独立有效事件次数 Mean daily independent events per camera | 流浪犬独特个体数(无重复) Number of unique stray dogs (no duplication) | 流浪犬种群规模Group size of stray dogs/ (individuals·group?1) |
| 赛区 Competition area | 2021 | 17 | 53.13 | 136 | 7 | 3±2 | |
| 2022 | 21 | 65.63 | 194 | 9 | 3±2 | ||
| 2023 | 23 | 71.88 | 247 | 11 | 4±2 | ||
| 大庄科 Dazhuangke | 2021 | 11 | 17.74 | 79 | 4 | 2±1 | |
| 2022 | 18 | 29.03 | 103 | 6 | 3±2 | ||
| 2023 | 27 | 43.55 | 224 | 9 | 4±2 | ||
| 玉渡山 Yudushan | 2021 | 14 | 18.67 | 62 | 2 | 2±1 | |
| 2022 | 16 | 21.33 | 117 | 3 | 2±1 | ||
| 2023 | 23 | 30.67 | 184 | 5 | 3±2 | ||
| 塘子沟 Tangzigou | 2021 | 9 | 17.65 | 79 | 2 | 2±1 | |
| 2022 | 13 | 25.49 | 97 | 5 | 3±2 | ||
| 2023 | 19 | 37.25 | 128 | 7 | 3±2 | ||
| 合计 Total | 2021 | 51 | 23.18 | 356 | 15 | 2±1 | |
| 2022 | 68 | 30.90 | 511 | 23 | 3±2 | ||
| 2023 | 92 | 41.82 | 783 | 32 | 4±2 |
| 陈俊达. 2023. 贺兰山地区赤狐与流浪狗的活动节律与食性比较. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. | |
| Chen J D. 2023. Comparison of activity rhythm and feeding habits of red foxes and feral dogs in Helan Mountain area. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
| 陈立军, 肖文宏, 肖治术. 物种相对多度指数在红外相机数据分析中的应用及局限. 生物多样性, 2019, 27 (3): 243- 248. | |
| Chen L J, Xiao W H, Xiao Z S. Limitations of relative abundance indices calculated from camera-trapping data. Biodiversity Science, 2019, 27 (3): 243- 248. | |
| 陈 星, 胡茜茜, 刘明星, 等. 有蹄类昼夜活动时空动态: 以岩羊(Pseudois nayaur)为例. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (3): 1251- 1258. | |
| Chen X, Hu Q Q, Liu M X, et al. A preliminary analysis on the spatio-temporal dynamic of ungulate’s circadian activities: a case study of Bharal (Pseudois nayaur). Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (3): 1251- 1258. | |
|
陈章敏, 彭 波, 贺 飞, 等. 四川小寨子沟国家级自然保护区有蹄类的时空格局研究. 四川动物, 2024, 43 (4): 373- 384.
doi: 10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20240003 |
|
|
Chen Z M, Peng B, He F, et al. A study on the temporal and spatial patterns of ungulates in the Xiaozhaizigou National Nature Reserve, Sichuan. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2024, 43 (4): 373- 384.
doi: 10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20240003 |
|
| 丁彦珂. 2023. 贺兰山地区赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)与流浪狗(Canis familiaris)生境选择及生境适宜性比较研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. | |
| Ding Y K. 2023. A study on comparing the habitat selection and habitat suitability assessment of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stray dog (Canis familiaris) in Helan. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
| 杜连海, 王小平, 陈峻崎, 等. 2012. 北京松山自然保护区综合科学考察报告. 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
| Du L H, Wang X P, Chen J Q, et al. 2012. Comprehensive scientific survey report on the Beijing Songshan Nature Reserve. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
|
韩 慧, 王 翠, 杨 乐, 等. 拉萨市城关区流浪狗的昼间行为节律. 野生动物学报, 2020, 41 (1): 80- 85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2020.01.011 |
|
|
Han H, Wang C, Yang L, et al. Behaviors of stray dogs in Chengguan district of Lhasa City, Tibet autonomous region. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 2020, 41 (1): 80- 85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0127.2020.01.011 |
|
| 江辉龙, 周绍春, 张明海, 等. 同域分布的野猪与狍活动节律及与月光周期的关系. 生态学报, 2023, 43 (8) 3136. | |
| Jiang H L, Zhou S C, Zhang M H, et al. Activity rhythm of wild boar and roe deer and its relationship with moonlight cycle in sympatric distribution. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43 (8) 3136. | |
| 可 灿. 2021. 基于红外相机技术的河南小秦岭国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性及家犬(Canis lupus familiaris)干扰研究. 新乡: 河南师范大学. | |
| Ke C. 2021. Study on birds and mammals diversity and Canis lupus familiaris disturbance in Xiaoqinling National Nature Reserve of Henan Province based on infrared camera technology. Xinxiang: Henan Normal University. [in Chinese] | |
| 刘振生, 陈立杰. 2015. 内蒙古贺兰山国家级自然保护区综合科学考察报告. 银川: 宁夏人民出版社. | |
| Liu Z S, Chen L J. 2015. Comprehensive scientific survey report on the Helanshan National Nature Reserve, Inner Mongolia. Yinchuan: Ningxia People’s Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
| 王小明, 刘振生, 李志刚, 等. 2011 宁夏贺兰山国家级自然保护区综合科学考察报告. 银川: 宁夏人民出版社. | |
| Wang X M, Liu Z S, Li Z G, et al. 2011. Comprehensive scientific survey report on the Helanshan National Nature Reserve, Ningxia. Yinchuan: Ningxia People’s Publishing House [in Chinese] | |
| 夏 凡, 鲍伟东, 盖立新, 等. 北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47 (1): 219- 225. | |
| Xia F, Bao W D, Gai L X, et al. Effects of infrastructure and stadium construction on wildlife in Yanqing competition area of Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2023, 47 (1): 219- 225. | |
| 杨 乐, 曹鹏熙, 李忠秋, 等. 西藏流浪狗的危害和防控. 生物学杂志, 2019, 36 (2): 94- 97. | |
| Yang L, Cao P X, Li Z Q, et al. Damage and control of free-ranging dogs in Tibet. Journal of Biology, 2019, 36 (2): 94- 97. | |
| 于思玉. 2023. 北京市自然保护区三种有蹄类动物种群密度与活动节律研究. 北京: 北京林业大学. | |
| Yu S Y. 2023. The study on three ungulates population density and daily activity rhythm in Beijing’s nature reserves. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
|
张红勇, 张德喜, 毛锐锐, 等. 甘肃兴隆山森林生态系统豹猫及其潜在猎物的日活动模式. 野生动物学报, 2023, 44 (2): 239- 247.
doi: 10.12375/ysdwxb.20230201 |
|
|
Zhang H Y, Zhang D X, Mao R R, et al. Daily activity patterns of leopard cats and their potential prey in forest ecosystem of Xinglong Mountains of Gansu Province, China. Chinese Journal of Wildlife, 2023, 44 (2): 239- 247.
doi: 10.12375/ysdwxb.20230201 |
|
|
张正宇, 于思玉, 房新民, 等. 北京市密云区雾灵山自然保护区狍日活动节律. 兽类学报, 2026, 46 (1): 85- 94.
doi: 10.16829/j.slxb.150975 |
|
|
Zhang Z Y, Yu S Y, Fang X M, et al. Daily activity rhythm of roe deer in Wulingshan Nature Reserve, Miyun district, Beijing. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2026, 46 (1): 85- 94.
doi: 10.16829/j.slxb.150975 |
|
| Atmeh K, Bonenfant C, Gaillard J M, et al. Neonatal antipredator tactics shape female movement patterns in large herbivores. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2025, 9 (1): 142- 152. | |
|
Avila A B, Corriale M J, Donadio E, et al. Capybara responses to varying levels of predation risk. Animal Behaviour, 2022, 190, 1- 9.
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.05.008 |
|
|
Blackburn T M, Bellard C, Ricciardi A. Alien versus native species as drivers of recent extinctions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2019, 17 (4): 203- 207.
doi: 10.1002/fee.2020 |
|
|
Butler J R A, du Toit J T, Bingham J. Free-ranging domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as predators and prey in rural Zimbabwe: threats of competition and disease to large wild carnivores. Biological Conservation, 2004, 115 (3): 369- 378.
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00152-6 |
|
|
Doherty T S, Dickman C R, Glen A S, et al. The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. Biological Conservation, 2017, 210, 56- 59.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.007 |
|
|
Doherty T S, Dickman C R, Nimmo D G, et al. Multiple threats, or multiplying the threats? Interactions between invasive predators and other ecological disturbances. Biological Conservation, 2015, 190, 60- 68.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.013 |
|
|
Farris Z J, Gerber B D, Karpanty S, et al. Exploring and interpreting spatiotemporal interactions between native and invasive carnivores across a gradient of rainforest degradation. Biological Invasions, 2020, 22, 2033- 2047.
doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02237-1 |
|
|
Gaynor K M, Hojnowski C E, Carter N E, et al. The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science, 2018, 360, 1232- 1235.
doi: 10.1126/science.aar7121 |
|
| Gompper M. 2013. The dog-human-wildlife interface: assessing the scope of the problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | |
|
Hughes J, MacDonald D W. A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 2013, 157, 341- 351.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005 |
|
| Jin Y, Zhang X, Ma Y, et al. 2017 Canine distemper viral infection threatens the giant panda population in China. Oncotarget, 8(69): 113910–113919. | |
|
Johnson C N, Balmford A, Brook B W, et al. Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science, 2017, 356, 270- 275.
doi: 10.1126/science.aam9317 |
|
| Kat P W, Alexander K A, Smith J S. Rabies among African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) in the Masai Mara, Kenya. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 1996, 8 (4): 420- 426. | |
| Loss S R, Marra P P. 2017. Population impacts of free-ranging domestic cats on mainland vertebrates. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 15(9): 502–509. | |
| Marc K, Kenneth F, Kellner. 2024. Applied statistical modelling for ecologists. Amsterdam: Elsevier. | |
|
Nayeri D, Mohammadi A, Qashqaei A T, et al. Free-ranging dogs as a potential threat to Iranian mammals. Oryx, 2022, 56 (3): 383- 389.
doi: 10.1017/S0030605321000090 |
|
|
Parsons A W, Bland C, Forreste T, et al. The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected areas in eastern north America. Biological Conservation, 2016, 203, 75- 88.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.09.001 |
|
|
Randall D A, Marino J, Haydon D T, et al. An integrated disease management strategy for the control of rabies in Ethiopian wolves. Biological Conservation, 2006, 131 (2): 151- 162.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.004 |
|
| Reimoser F, Nopp-Mayr U. 2024. Ecology, diversity, conservation and management of ungulates. Diversity, 2024, 16: 182. | |
|
Robin P, Mark V K, Dominique S. Closely related aliens lead to greater extinction risk. Biological Conservation, 2023, 284, 110148.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110148 |
|
|
Rowcliffe J M, Kays R, Kranstauber B, et al. Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 5 (11): 1170- 1179.
doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12278 |
|
| Saara J, Anna V, Katariina M, et al. 2024. Do cognitive traits associate with everyday behaviour in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris? Animal Behaviour, 213: 71–84. | |
|
Salvador A C, Neftalí S. Cross-scale monitoring of habitat suitability changes using satellite time series and ecological niche models. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 748, 147172.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147172 |
|
|
Simon K, Tomas O C, Luis G N, et al. Prey vulnerability and predation pressure shape predator-induced changes in O2 consumption and antipredator behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 2020, 167, 13- 22.
doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.07.009 |
|
|
Silva-Rodríguez E A, Sieving K. Domestic dogs shape the landscape-scale distribution of a threatened forest ungulate. Biological Conservation, 2012, 150 (1): 103- 110.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.008 |
|
|
Wang L, Feng J, Mou P. Relative abundance of roe deer (Capreolus pygargus) related to overstory structure and understory food resources in northeast China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 46, e02542.
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02542 |
|
|
Weng Y, McShea W, Diao Y, et al. The incursion of free-ranging dogs into protected areas: a spatio-temporal analysis in a network of giant Panda reserves. Biological Conservation, 2022, 265, 109423.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109423 |
|
| Wilmers C C, Levi T, Prugh L R, J et al. 2025. The ecological impacts of large-carnivore recovery in north America. Annual Review Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 56: 337–363. | |
|
Xia X, Li F J, Fan J, et al. Potential disturbance to native carnivore community caused by stray dogs in the Helan Mountains against the background of snow leopard reintroduction. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2025, 16 (02): 593- 602.
doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.02.026 |
|
|
Young J K, Olson K A, Richard P R, et al. Is wildlife going to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. BioScience, 2011, 61 (2): 125- 132.
doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.7 |
|
|
Zong X, Wang T J, Andrew K S, et al. Habitat visibility affects the behavioral response of a large herbivore to human disturbance in forest landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 348, 119244.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119244 |
| [1] | 王丞,李海波,杨朝辉,毕兴,樊涵,粟海军,胡灿实,张明明. 梵净山东北部同域黔金丝猴与藏酋猴的时空分布格局[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(3): 117-128. |
| [2] | 蒙秉顺,王丞,王亚强,樊涵,谢波,冉伟,张明明. 梵净山保护区同域分布5种雉类的日活动节律[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(11): 137-148. |
| [3] | 孟令君,张春雨,姚杰,赵秀海. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林乔木幼苗存活对密度和生境的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(11): 172-180. |
| [4] | 曹丹丹, 魏建荣, 王伟超, 王丽平, 赵正萍, 刘曙雯, 嵇保中. 松材线虫病死木皮下的南京隐翅虫(鞘翅目:隐翅虫科)[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 157-162. |
| [5] | 薛亚东, 孙志成, 吴鹏, 张于光, 李迪强. 散养条件下野生双峰驼初冬活动时间分配及节律[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(2): 169-174. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||