黄藤2个NAC基因的分子特征及其SSR分子标记开发

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170815

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的]棕榈藤是重要的森林植物，纤鞭是其重要的攀援器官，也是重要的分类依据。研究黄藤NAC（NAM，ATAF和CUC）转录因子基因的分子特征并开发SSR分子标记，以期为棕榈藤的分子育种和辅助分类提供参考依据。[方法]以黄藤为材料，借助转录组数据，采用同源克隆的方法从黄藤中分离NAC基因，采用生物信息学方法进行基因结构、蛋白性质与结构分析和SSR位点预测，采用实时定量PCR技术分析基因的组织表达特性，利用PAGE电泳和测序技术分析SSR分子标记在不同棕榈藤样品中的通用性和多态性。[结果]从黄藤叶片中获得了2个NAC同源基因DjNAC3（GenBank登录号：KU556738）和DjNAC4（GenBank登录号：KX579750），二者的开放阅读框长度分别为729 bp和1 326 bp，对应的基因组序列为850 bp和1 441 bp，均包含2个外显子和1个内含子。DjNAC3和DjNAC4编码的蛋白分别为242 aa和441 aa。蛋白结构分析表明，DjNAC3和DjNAC4具有典型的NAC转录因子结构特征，属于NAC家族的CUC亚家族，但二者之间的相似系数仅为23.6%，表明它们在黄藤生长发育过程中可能具有不同的功能。DjNAC3和DjNAC4在不同组织中的表达模式存在明显差异，DjNAC3在发育成熟纤鞭中的表达丰度最高，叶片中的表达丰度最低，而DjNAC4则在发育成熟的钩刺中表达丰度最高，而发育初期的钩刺中最低。在DjNAC3和DjNAC4的基因组序列中分别包含1个SSR位点，其中前者的SSR位点位于内含子区域，为（TA）₆，后者的SSR位点位于第1个外显子区域，为（GCA）₅。根据DjNAC3和DjNAC4中SSR位点旁侧序列设计引物，以黄藤和另外20个不同棕榈藤样品的基因组DNA为模板进行扩增，PAGE电泳结果分析表明，引物具有较高的通用性，且扩增产物具有多态性。6个样品的测序结果证实，用DjNAC3设计引物的扩增产物测序获得的SSR位点序列存在着一定的差异，既包括SSR类型变异、重复次数变化等多态性，又有SSR位点缺失的现象；而根据DjNAC4设计引物扩增获得的SSR位点序列差异主要为重复次数的变化。[结论]黄藤DjNAC3和DjNAC4基因的基因结构、表达模式、SSR位点等均存在明显的差异，这表明它们在黄藤生长发育中可能具有不同的功能，二者所包含的SSR分子标记具有通用性和多态性，可以作为分子标记应用于棕榈藤的辅助分类和分子辅助育种。

关键词: 黄藤, NAC, 基因表达, SSR开发

Abstract: [Objective]Rattan is one of the important forest plants, cirri and flagella are important organs for its climbing habit, which are also the important basis for rattan classification. In order to provide a basis for molecular breeding and SSR-assisted classification of rattan, study on the molecular characteristics of NAC (NAM, ATAF and CUC) transcription factor genes in Daemonorops jenkinsiana and the development of SSR markers was performed in this paper.[Method]With the aid of transcriptome data, the sequences of NAC homologue genes in D. jenkinsiana were isolated by PCR method. The analyses of gene structure, protein properties and structure as well as the prediction of SSR locus in NAC genes were conducted using bioinformatics method. The tissue specific expression of NAC genes in different tissues were analyzed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). To evaluate the universality and polymorphism of the developed SSR markers, PAGE electrophoresis and sequencing analyses were used on the basis of products amplified with different rattan samples.[Result]Two homologous genes, DjNAC3 (GenBank No. KU556738) and DjNAC4 (GenBank No. KX579750), were obtained from leaves of D. jenkinsiana, of which open reading frame (ORF) were 729 bp and 1 326 bp, respectively. The genomic sequence corresponding to the ORFs of DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 were 850 bp and 1 441 bp, which all contained two exons and one intron. The proteins encoded by DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 were 242 aa and 441 aa respectively. Protein structure analysis showed that DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 had the typical structural features of NAC transcription factors, which were belonged to the CUC subfamily of NAC family. However, the similarity coefficient between DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 was only 23.6%, indicating that they might have different functions in the growth process of D. jenkinsiana. The expression patterns of DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 in different tissues were obviously different. DjNAC3 was expressed in developed cirri with the highest level, and the lowest in leaves, while that of DjNAC4 was the highest abundance in developed barbs and the lowest in early developed barbs. The SSR loci were detected in the genomic sequences of DjNAC3 and DjNAC4, the SSR locus of (TA)₆ was located in the intron region of DjNAC3 and that of (GCA)₅ was in the first exon of DjNAC4. SSR primers were designed according to the flanking sequences of SSR loci in DjNAC3 and DjNAC4. Genomic DNAs of D. jenkinsiana and other 20 different rattan samples were selected as templates for amplification. PAGE electrophoresis analysis showed that the primers had universality and polymorphism in the samples. The sequencing result of amplification products from six different templates further confirmed the polymorphism such as variation of SSR type, the number change of repetitions, and SSR locus missing, which were found in the sequences generated by the primer pair designed based on DjNAC3. The main difference in the sequences generated by the primer pair designed according to DjNAC4 was the number change of repetitions.[Conclusion]There are significant differences between DjNAC3 and DjNAC4, such as gene structures, gene expression patterns, and SSR locus, which means that DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 might play different roles in the growth and development of D. jenkinsiana. The universality and polymorphism of SSR markers developed from DjNAC3 and DjNAC4 indicate that they can serve as molecular markers for rattan classification and molecular-assisted breeding.

Key words: Daemonorops jenkinsiana, NAC, gene expression, SSR development

中图分类号:

S718.46

孙化雨, 李利超, 赵韩生, 杨意宏, 王思宁, 高志民. 黄藤2个NAC基因的分子特征及其SSR分子标记开发[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(8): 132-140.

Sun Huayu, Li Lichao, Zhao Hansheng, Yang Yihong, Wang Sining, Gao Zhimin. Molecular Characteristics and SSR Marker Development of Two NAC Genes from Daemonorops jenkinsiana[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(8): 132-140.

参考文献

高志民, 范少辉, 高健, 等. 2006. 基于CTAB法提取毛竹基因组DNA的探讨. 林业科学研究, 19(6):725-728.
(Gao Z M, Fan S H, Gao J,et al. 2006. Extract genomic DNA from Phyllostachys edulis by CTAB-based method. Forest Research, 19(6):725-728.[in Chinese])
江泽慧,王康林. 2013. 中国棕榈藤. 北京:科学出版社, 90-92.
(Jiang Z H, Wang K L. 2013. Rattan in China. Beijing:Science Press, 90-92.[in Chinese])
黎帮勇, 胡尚连, 曹颖, 等. 2015. 毛竹NAC 转录因子家族生物信息学分析. 基因组学与应用生物学, 34(8):1769-1777.
(Li B Y, Hu S L, Cao Y,et al. 2015. Bioinformatics analysis of NAC gene family in moso bamboo. Genomics Applied Biol, 34(8):1769-1777.[in Chinese])
Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A. 2015. WRKY proteins:signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. Sci World J, 2015:807560.
Christiansen M W, Matthewman C,Podzimska-Sroka D, et al. 2016. Barley plants over-expressing the NAC transcription factor gene HvNAC005 show stunting and delay in development combined with early senescence. J Exp Bot, 67 (17):5259-5273.
Gao Z M, Li X P, Li L B,et al. 2006. An effective method for total RNA isolation from bamboo. Chinese For Sci Tech, 5(3):52-54.
Guo Y, Gan S. 2006. AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. Plant J, 46(4):601-612.
Ha C V, Esfahani M N, Watanabe Y,et al. 2014. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the CaNAC family members in chickpea during development, dehydration and ABA treatments. PLoS One, 9(12):e114107.
He X J, Mu R L, Cao W H,et al. 2005. AtNAC2, a transcription factor downstream of ethylene and auxin signaling pathways, is involved in salt stress response and lateral root development. Plant J, 44(6):903-916.
Kim S G, Kim S Y, Park C M. 2007. A membrane-associated NAC transcription factor regulates salt-responsive flowering via FLOWERING LOCUST in Arabidopsis. Planta, 6(3):647-654.
Kim S G, Lee A K, Yoon H K,et al. 2008. A membrane-bound NAC transcription factor NTL8 regulates gibberellic acid-mediated salt signaling in Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant J, 55(1):77-88.
Kou X, Watkins C B, Gan S S. 2012.Arabidopsis AtNAP regulates fruit senescence. J Exp Bot, 63(17):6139-6147.
Le D T, Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y,et al. 2011. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the plant-specific NAC transcription factor family in soybean during development and dehydration stress. DNA Res, 18(4):263-276.
Li Y C, Korol A B, Fahima T,et al. 2004. Microsatellites within genes:structure, function, and evolution. Mol Biol Evol, 21(6):991-1007.
Lin R M, Zhao W S, Meng X B,et al. 2007. Rice gene OsNAC19 encodes a novel NAC-domain transcription factor and responds to infection by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Sci, 172(1):120-130.
Liu T K, Song X M, Duan W K,et al. 2014. Genome-wide analysis and expression patterns of NAC transcription factor family under different developmental stages and abiotic stresses in Chinese cabbage. Plant Mol Biol Report, 32(5):1041-1056.
Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^-ΔΔCt method. Methods, 25:402-408.
Moore M J, Query C C, Sharp P A. 1993. Splicing of precursors to mRNA by the spliceosome//Gesteland R F, Atkins J F. The RNA world. Cold Spring Harbor:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 303-357.
Nakashima K, Takasaki H, Mizoi J,et al. 2012. NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1819(2):97-103.
Nikovics K, Blein T, Peaucelle A,et al. 2006. The balance between the MIR164A and CUC2 genes controls leaf margin serration in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 18(11):2929-2945.
Niu F, Wang C, Yan J,et al. 2016. Functional characterization of NAC55 transcription factor from oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) as a novel transcriptional activator modulating reactive oxygen species accumulation and cell death. Plant Mol Biol, 92(1/2):89-104.
Nuruzzaman M, Manimekalai R, Sharoni A M,et al. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of NAC transcription factor family in rice. Gene, 465(1/2):30-44.
Nuruzzaman M, Sharoni A M, Kikuchi S. 2013. Roles of NAC transcription factors in the regulation of biotic and abiotic stress responses in plants. Front Microbiol, 4:248.
Olsen A N, Ernst H A, Leggio L L,et al. 2005. NAC transcription factors:structurally distinct, functionally diverse. Trends Plant Sci, 10(2):79-87.
Pereira-Santana A, Alcaraz L D, Castaño E, et al. 2015. Comparative genomics of NAC transcriptional factors in angiosperms:Implications for the adaptation and diversification of flowering plants. PLoS One, 10(11):e0141866.
Rahman H, Ramanathan V, Nallathambi J,et al. 2016. Over-expression of a NAC 67 transcription factor from finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) confers tolerance against salinity and drought stress in rice. BMC Biotechnol, Suppl 1:35.
Saad A S, Li X, Li H P,et al. 2013. A rice stress-responsive NAC gene enhances tolerance of transgenic wheat to drought and salt stresses. Plant Sci, 203/204:33-40.
Seo P J, Kim M J, Park J Y,et al. 2010. Cold activation of a plasma membrane-tethered NAC transcription factor induces a pathogen resistance response in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 61(4):661-671.
Shiriga K, Sharma R, Kumar K,et al. 2014. Genome-wide identification and expression pattern of drought-responsive members of the NAC family in maize. Meta Gene, 2:407-417.
Souer E, van Houwelingen A, Kloos D,et al. 1996. The no apical meristem gene of petunia is required for pattern formation in embryos and flowers and is expressed at meristem and primordia boundaries. Cell, 85(2):159-170.
Su H, Zhang S, Yin Y,et al. 2015. Genome-wide analysis of NAM-ATAF1,2-CUC2 transcription factor family in Solanum lycopersicum. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol, 24(2):176-183.
Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A,et al. 2001. Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.):frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Res, 11(8):1441-1452.
Tran L S, Nishiyama R,Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. 2010. Potential utilization of NAC transcription factors to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in plants by biotechnological approach. GM Crops, 1(1):32-39.
Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Fahima T,et al. 2006. A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science, 314(5803):1298-1301.
Wang L, Zhao H, Chen D,et al. 2016. Characterization and primary functional analysis of a bamboo NAC gene targeted by miR164b. Plant Cell Rep, (6):1371-1383.
Zhu G, Chen G, Zhu J,et al. 2015. Molecular characterization and expression profiling of NAC transcription factors in Brachypodium distachyon L. PLoS One, 10(10):e0139794.
Zimmermann R, Werr W. 2005. Pattern formation in the monocot embryo as revealed by NAM and CUC3 orthologues from Zea mays L. Plant Mol Biol, 58(5):669-685.

[1]	刘道凤, 王霞, 代银, 杨建峰, 马婧, 李名扬, 眭顺照. 蜡梅转录因子CpTAF10基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(6): 176-183.
[2]	卢惠君, 李子义, 梁瀚予, 岳远志, 周天畅, 杨玉璋, 王玉成, 及晓宇. 刚毛柽柳NAC24基因的表达及抗逆功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3): 54-63.
[3]	范伟健, 相伟芳, 王静, 白鹏华, 潘丽娜, 杨艺新, 朱耿平, 李敏. 农药与紫外胁迫对白蛾周氏啮小蜂小分子热激蛋白sHSP12.2基因表达的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 128-136.
[4]	张扬, 杜琳, 唐贤丰, 刘唤唤, 周功克, 柴国华. 杨树BAG基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 138-145.
[5]	魏明科, 俞金健, 黄晓龙, 刘琼瑶, 黄华宏, 林二培, 童再康. 杉木NAC转录因子基因ClNAC1的克隆、表达及单核苷酸多态性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9): 49-59.
[6]	王娟, 陈辉. 华山松大小蠹冷休克结合蛋白的鉴定与表达[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(4): 58-66.
[7]	张鹤华, 刘嘉欣, 罗朝兵, 张凌云. 青杄转录因子PwERF8及其启动子序列的克隆与分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(3): 48-60.
[8]	李建波, 贾会霞, 张进, 刘伯斌, 胡建军, 王丽娟, 卢孟柱. 毛白杨PtoWOX4a基因过表达对次生生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(2): 52-59.
[9]	唐绯绯, 赵玉琳, 王培龙, 冯德明, 宋怡, 高彩球. 刚毛柽柳ThP5CR基因的克隆及抗逆功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(7): 1-9.
[10]	李楠, 郑勇奇, 丁红梅, 柳新红, 盛炜彤, 江波, 李海波. 低温胁迫下短枝木麻黄耐寒相关基因的差异表达分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(7): 62-71.
[11]	游韩莉, 袁义杭, 李长江, 张凌云. 青杄MYB转录因子基因PwMYB20的克隆及表达分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5): 23-32.
[12]	余建, 赵爱春, 刘长英, 梁燕梅, 朱攀攀, 蔡雨翔, 王茜龄, 李镇刚, 余茂德. 外源乙烯利与1-MCP处理对桑椹中乙烯和花青素相关代谢基因表达的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2): 138-148.
[13]	王凯利, 傅鹰, 周明兵. 毛竹SQUAMOSA启动子结合蛋白SBP家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(12): 50-61.
[14]	李真, 王留强, 卢孟柱. 毛白杨PtoWOX11/12a对杨树扦插苗生长发育的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(11): 69-76.
[15]	孙丽娟, 王晓荣, 倪晓详, 程龙军. 巨桉非生物逆境响应基因EgrNAC1的基因结构和表达分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(10): 60-69.