欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 157-162.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160619

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同区域落叶松二元立木材积表的检验及差异分析

李晖, 曾伟生   

  1. 国家林业局调查规划设计院 北京 100714
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-13 修回日期:2015-11-09 出版日期:2016-06-25 发布日期:2016-07-04
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31270697,31370634)。

Validation and Comparison of Two-Variable Tree Volume Tables for Larix spp. in Different Regions of China

Li Hui, Zeng Weisheng   

  1. Academy of Forest Inventory and Planning, State Forestry Administration Beijing 100714
  • Received:2015-07-13 Revised:2015-11-09 Online:2016-06-25 Published:2016-07-04
  • Contact: 曾伟生

摘要: [目的] 准确评估不同区域落叶松立木材积表是否存在偏差,并掌握不同区域材积表之间的差异大小,为修订和完善我国二元立木材积表提供依据。[方法] 基于最新采集的东北、华北、西北和西南4大区域480株落叶松样木实测材积数据,首先利用回归方程的适应性检验方法分析不同区域落叶松立木材积表是否存在偏差,然后利用混合模型方法分析不同区域二元立木材积方程之间是否存在差异及其差异大小,最后利用哑变量模型方法建立含区域特定参数的立木材积方程。[结果] 对部颁标准的4个落叶松二元立木材积表进行检验发现,3个材积表的估计误差均超出了±3%的允许范围,存在明显的系统偏差,最大偏差可达到12%左右。对不同区域二元立木材积方程之间的差异显著性检验发现,其材积估计值从大到小依次为东北、西北、西南、华北,东北与华北之间差异极显著(P<0.01),西北与华北之间差异显著(0.01≤ P< 0.05),西南与东北之间差异稍显著(0.05≤ P< 0.10),其他两两之间的差异不显著。通过建立含区域特定参数的立木材积方程,发现3种建模方案(全国1个总体、2个总体和4个总体)之间的差异并不大;全国建立1个通用性落叶松立木材积方程与4个区域分别建立4个材积方程相比较,不同区域材积估计值的最大误差仅为3%左右。[结论] 原部颁标准的二元立木材积表大多数可能已经存在明显偏差,建议对全部二元立木材积表进行一次系统检验,在此基础上对已存在明显偏差的材积表进行更新或修订。不同区域的二元立木材积表差异不大,建议由国务院林业主管部门统筹考虑,明确各主要树种二元立木材积表编制的总体范围,并逐步建立全国林业数表体系,促进林业数表编制的标准化。

关键词: 材积表, 混合模型, 哑变量模型, 检验, 落叶松

Abstract: [Objective] This paper aimed at accurately assessing whether there are deviations or not and grasping the differences among tree volume tables of larch (Larix spp.) in different regions, so as to provide the basis for revising and improving the two-variable tree volume tables.[Method] Based on the newly collected volume data of 480 sample trees of larch from four regions, i.e., northeastern, northern, northwestern and southwestern regions, the current two-variable tree volume tables for different regions were examined using adaptability test method of regression equations, the differences of two-variable tree volume equations were analyzed using mixed model approach, and the two-variable tree volume equations with region-specific parameters were developed using dummy-variable model method.[Result] The validation results of 4 two-variable tree volume tables published as ministerial standards showed that the estimation errors of three tree volume tables exceeded allowable range (±3%) and the largest error reached to about 12%, indicating significantly systematic bias. From the results of difference significance test of two-variable tree volume equations for different regions, it was found that the four regions ranked by volume estimate from large to small as northeast, northwest, southwest and north; the difference of volume estimates between northeastern and northern regions was highly significant (P<0.01), that between northwestern and northern regions was significant (0.01≤ P< 0.05), that between northeastern and southwestern regions was lowly significant (0.05≤ P< 0.10), and those between any other two regions were not significant. The developed tree volume equations with region-specific parameters showed that little differences were existed among three modeling alternatives, i.e., one population only, two populations and four populations for four regions. From the comparison of two alternatives, i.e., one generalized volume equation for the whole country and four volume equations for four regions, the largest relative error of volume estimates in different regions was only about 3%.[Conclusion] Most of the two-variable tree volume tables published as ministerial standards are probably biased, it is recommended that all two-variable tree volume tables should be systematically examined, and the biased volume tables should be updated or revised. The differences of two-variable tree volume equations among different regions are not so large, and it is suggested that the population classification for developing two-variable tree volume equations for major tree species should be considered by State Forestry Administration at national level. It is necessary to develop gradually a system of forestry tables covering the whole country to promote the standardization for establishing forestry tables.

Key words: volume table, mixed model, dummy-variable model, validation, Larix

中图分类号: