欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 65-72.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20110710

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于树冠覆盖的广州市中心区绿化格局分析

朱耀军1, 王成2, 贾宝全2, 粟娟3   

  1. 1. 中国林业科学研究院湿地研究所 北京 100091;2. 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所 国家林业局城市林业研究中心 北京 100091;3. 广州市林业和园林局 广州 510030
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-22 修回日期:2010-08-25 出版日期:2011-07-25 发布日期:2011-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 王成

Canopy-Based Greening Pattern in the Urban Region of Guangzhou

Zhu Yaojun1, Wang Cheng2, Jia Baoquan2, Su Juan3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Wetland, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing 100091;2. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry Research Centre of Urban Forestry, State Forestry Administration Beijing 100091;3. Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Forestry and Landscape Guangzhou 510030
  • Received:2010-03-22 Revised:2010-08-25 Online:2011-07-25 Published:2011-07-25

摘要:

基于城市森林功能分类和斑块等级的思想框架,对高空间分辨率航片数据进行解译,以广州市中心区作为研究区,对其树冠覆盖景观进行分析。结果表明: 1) 研究区树冠覆盖率为19.5%,其中天河区最高达26.5%,芳村区最低仅6.6%。生态公益林在5个类型组(生态公益林、公共园林、居所林、生产林和防护林)的树冠覆盖斑块中面积最大,占55.4%,其次为生产林,占19.9%。各类型的平均面积以生态片林最大,行道树最小。2) 树冠覆盖斑块以面积大于1 hm2的特大型为主,占总斑块面积的78.8%,小斑块(<0.1 hm2)、中斑块(0.1~0.5 hm2)和大斑块(0.5~1 hm2)分别占9.2%,7.9%和4.2%。生态片林在特大型斑块中所占比例最大,其次为生产林,其他面积等级斑块均以居所林所占比例最大。3) 特大斑块主要位于中心区北部的白云山和城市发展东部拓展区的天河、黄埔的丘岗林地区域,以及海珠区南部,而荔湾区、越秀区和东山区均以小斑块数量占优。面积在0.5~1 hm2的斑块多分布于特大型斑块周边,主要是由人为干扰引起的破碎化表现。树冠连续覆盖是实现生态过程与格局连续性的有效途径,行道树类型斑块数量最大,相对破碎,但最具形成连续覆盖的潜力。通过对航片数据中树冠覆盖数据的分析,在一定程度上可以反映城市绿化质量,了解城市生态建设的过程,研究结果可为广州市在更小尺度上的城市森林相关的生态过程研究和景观格局优化提供参考。

关键词: 广州, 树冠覆盖, 功能分类, 城市森林

Abstract:

Tree canopy coverage landscape was analyzed based on the design framework of function classification and scale system in the urban region of Guangzhou. The results showed that the ratio of tree canopy coverage was 19.5%, with the highest (26.5%) in Tianhe district, and the lowest (6.6%) in Fangcun district. Ecological beneficial forests were dominant among the five types including ecological benefit forests, public garden, residential forests, production forests and special protective forests. The coverage ratio of ecological beneficial forests was highest and accounted for 55.4% of total tree canopy, and the production forests took second, with 19.9%. The ecological chunk forest had the largest mean acreage, while roadside trees was the smallest. The coverage ratio of extra large patches, with each area larger than 1 hm2, was 78.8%, and the ratio of small-sized(<0.1 hm2), medium-sized (0.1-0.5 hm2)and large-sized patches(0.5-1 hm2) was 9.2%, 7.9% and 4.2%, respectively. Extra large-sized patches were dominated in ecological beneficial forests and production forest stands, while other sized patches were regnant in residential forests . Extra large-sized patches were mostly distributed in the mountainous area, which located in the north of the urban region and the eastern developing belt in Tianhe and Huangpu districts, and orchard fields in the south of Haizhu district as well. Number of the planted small-sized patches was the most in the old city area. Most of the large-sized patches were adjacent to the extra large-sized patches, and the pattern might be caused by the fragment of extra large-sized patches in the process of urbanization. Continuous tree canopy is an effective approach for implementing the continuity of ecological progress and pattern. Roadside trees type, being the most at patch numbers and fragmental relatively, has the most potential for forming continuous coverage patch via spatial linkage. The results provided valuable information for related research of urban forest and landscape pattern optimizing at small scale in Guangzhou.

Key words: Guangzhou, tree canopy coverage, function classification, urban forest

中图分类号: