杉木林间伐强度自然稀疏与结构规律研究

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20060110

林业科学 ›› 2006, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 55-62.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20060110

杉木林间伐强度自然稀疏与结构规律研究

张水松¹ 陈长发² 何寿庆² 吴克选² 詹有生²

1.福建省林业科学研究院,福州350012；2.江西省林业科学研究院,南昌330032

收稿日期:2004-03-26 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-25 发布日期:2006-01-25

The Natural Thinning and Structural Pattern of the Intermediate Cutting Intensity in the Cunninghamia lanceolata Stand

Zhang Shuisong¹,Chen Changfa²,He Shouqing²,Wu Kexuan²,Zhan Yousheng²

1. Fujian Academy of Forestry Fuzhou 350012; 2. Jiangxi Academy of Forestry Nanchang 330032

Received:2004-03-26 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2006-01-25 Published:2006-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在杉木人工林抚育间伐强度试验20年中,研究不同间伐强度林分自然稀疏的变化,揭示自然稀疏株数与林分密度和立地条件的关系,对杉木林密度管理图自然稀疏线数学方程M=k₁·k₂作出检验,提出不同间伐强度林分直径、树高和林冠结构等。自然稀疏研究表明,CK和弱度间伐自然稀疏起始期高峰期早,稀疏量大,稀疏过程具连续性,按其稀疏量可分为轻微稀疏期、剧烈稀疏期和延续稀疏期等3个阶段,若不加以人为干预,自然稀疏将是一个漫长的过程。中度和强度间伐稀疏起始期和高峰期之间呈间歇性、稀疏阶段性不明显。研究发现,林分密度和立地条件对枯死木株数均有重要作用,但密度比立地条件更重要。杉木林密管图自然稀疏线数学方程经检验,相对误差3.91%,精度较高;对其用于不同间伐强度和不同地位指数林分的实用性检验结果,CK相对误差5.23%,其他检验项目相对误差均<5%,为容许试验误差,实用性较强。研究揭示了不同间伐强度林分径级和树高级分布规律等。研究还得出不同间伐强度林分枝下高、林冠长度和林冠相对高度的生长差异、变化动态及其与林龄增长的各种相关规律,并分别提出其与林龄和单株材积定期生长量相关的数学模型。

关键词: 杉木林, 间伐强度, 自然稀疏, 林分结构

Abstract:

In the intermediate cutting intensity experiment of the Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation for 20 years,the change pattern of stand natural thinning through the different intermediate cutting intensities was studied,the relationship between tree number of the natural thinning and the stand intensity & site conditions was revealed,the mathematical equation M=k₁·k₂ of natural thinning lines of C.lanceolata stand density management map was tested,and the diameter,height and canopy structure laws of the stand with different intermediate cutting intensities were put forward.The natural thinning studies indicated that the starting period and peak period of the natural thinning through the CK and slight intermediate cutting were both early,the thinning amount was large and the thinning course possessed continuity.The three stages of the slight thinning period,intensive thinning period and continual thinning period could be divided out according to the thinning amount.The natural thinning would be a very long process without the artificial interference.The thinning starting period and peak period through the middle and strong intermediate felling are both late and assume intermittence.Their thinning stages were not evident.By means of the studies we also found that the stand density and site conditions had important effects on the dead and dying tree number,but the density was more important than the site conditions.Through the test,the relative error of the mathematical equation of natural thinning lines of C.lanceolata stand density management map was 3.91% and the precision was relatively high.The practical test results of the stand with different intermediate cutting intensities and different site indexes showed that the CK relative error was 5.23%,the relative errors of the other tested items were all<5%,which were all the allowable experimental errors.The mathematical equation was comparatively practical.The studies revealed the distribution laws of diameter classes and height classes of the stand with different intermediate cutting intensities.Through the studies we also obtained the growth differences and change dynamics of the under_branch height,canopy length and canopy relative height of the stand with different intermediate cutting intensities and various related pattern with the increase of stand age and put forward the mathematical model relating to the stand age and the single_tree volume periodic increment.

Key words: Cunninghamia lanceolata, intermediate cutting intensity, natural thinning, stand structure

张水松陈长发何寿庆吴克选詹有生. 杉木林间伐强度自然稀疏与结构规律研究[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(1): 55-62.

Zhang Shuisong;Chen Changfa;He Shouqing;Wu Kexuan;Zhan Yousheng. The Natural Thinning and Structural Pattern of the Intermediate Cutting Intensity in the Cunninghamia lanceolata Stand[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(1): 55-62.

[1]	赵中华,惠刚盈. 林分结构多样性研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(9): 143-152.
[2]	竹万宽,许宇星,王志超,杜阿朋. 中国桉树人工林生物量估算系数及影响要素[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(5): 1-11.
[3]	邓磊,朱春云,于世川,祁银燕,张文辉,杜盛,关晋宏. 祁连山青海云杉中龄林混交度对细根形态特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(1): 191-200.
[4]	王文杰, 杜红居, 肖路, 张建宇, 仲召亮, 周伟, 张波, 王洪元. 凉水自然保护区3种森林类型的植物组成和林分结构特征[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9): 166-176.
[5]	叶钰倩, 赵家豪, 刘畅, 关庆伟. 间伐强度对马尾松人工林根际与非根际土壤中性糖特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8): 28-35.
[6]	徐雪蕾, 孙玉军, 周华, 张鹏, 胡杨, 王新杰. 间伐强度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3): 1-12.
[7]	杨桂娟,胡海帆,孙洪刚,张建国,段爱国. 林分年龄、造林密度和林分自然稀疏对杉木人工林个体大小分化和生产力关系的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(11): 126-136.
[8]	冯宜明, 李毅, 曹秀文, 刘锦乾, 齐瑞, 赵阳, 陈学龙. 甘肃南部不同密度云杉人工幼林的林分结构特征及土壤理化性质[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(10): 20-30.
[9]	朱玉杰, 董希斌. 大兴安岭地区落叶松用材林不同抚育间伐强度经营效果评价[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(12): 29-38.
[10]	龚固堂, 牛牧, 慕长龙, 陈俊华, 黎燕琼, 朱志芳, 郑绍伟. 间伐强度对柏木人工林生长及林下植物的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(4): 8-15.
[11]	王云霓, 曹恭祥, 王彦辉, 熊伟, 于澎涛, 徐丽宏. 宁夏六盘山华北落叶松人工林植被碳密度特征[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(10): 10-16.
[12]	李婷婷, 陆元昌, 庞丽峰, 张显强, 王霞, 刘宪钊, 姜俊. 杉木人工林近自然经营的初步效果[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(5): 90-100.
[13]	左舒翟, 任引, 王效科, 张小全, 罗云建. 中国杉木林生物量估算参数及其影响因素[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(11): 1-12.
[14]	李斌;方晰;项文化;田大伦;. 湖南省杉木林植被碳贮量、碳密度及碳吸存潜力[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(3): 25-32.
[15]	范叶青, 周国模, 施拥军, 杜华强, 周宇峰, 徐小军. 地形条件对毛竹林分结构和植被碳储量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(11): 177-182.

杉木林间伐强度自然稀疏与结构规律研究

The Natural Thinning and Structural Pattern of the Intermediate Cutting Intensity in the Cunninghamia lanceolata Stand

HTML

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者中心

期刊获奖

引证指标

联系方式