欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2004, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 142-147.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20040123

• 论文及研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

木屑添加磷酸与氯化锌热解的DTATG曲线比较研究

林启模 黄碧中 胡淑宜   

  1. 福建农林大学,福州350002;
  • 收稿日期:2002-07-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-01-25 发布日期:2004-01-25

Analysis of DTA/TG Curve of Wood with Phosphoric Acid and Zinc Chloride

Lin Qimo,Huang Bizong,Hu Shuyi   

  1. Fujian Agricultural and Forestry Univerisity Fuzhou350002
  • Received:2002-07-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-01-25 Published:2004-01-25

摘要:

应用差热天平对磷酸和氯化锌药品及分别添加磷酸和氯化锌的木屑、分离纤维素、分离木素热解过程的DTA/TG曲线进行比较。分析结果表明:磷酸和氯化锌两种试剂有相似的DTA/TG曲线变化状况,两试剂也都较稳定;但在高温气化区间,磷酸试剂的起始气化温度、热解终温和残余量都明显高于氯化锌试剂。添加两种药品的木屑热解过程的DTA/TG曲线变化相似:在初期都催促炭化反应,在200℃左右基本上完成炭化阶段;随着温度升高,进入主要活化温度区间,在高温区都发生气化反应。不同的是:适宜的活化温度区间,H3PO4-木屑明显比ZnCl2 -木屑宽。同时气化反应温度、热解终温及其残余量也是前者高,这说明磷酸保护炭体的作用比氯化锌强。添加两种药品对纤维素热解过程的影响,总体变化类同于对木屑的影响。同时,两种药品对纤维素热解的影响差异小。添加两种药品对木素热解的影响差别较大。磷酸影响着木素热解的全过程,不过影响程度不如纤维素和木屑。氯化锌对木素热解的初期促进炭化反应,但在热解的中、后期,尤其是后期基本上不起作用了。从DTA/TG曲线比较分析,结合小型炭活化试验结果得知,在本试验下,磷酸法较佳温度是400℃左右,氧化锌法是500℃左右。

关键词: 活性炭, 磷酸法, 氯化锌法, 差热分析, 热重分析

Abstract:

With differential thermal balance, and by taking a comparative study of DTA/TG curves of Phosphoric acid and Zinc chloride, as well as the curves during pyrolysis of wood dust, separated cellulose and separated lignin which have H3PO4 and ZnCl 2 added respectively, It found that: H3PO4 and ZnCl2 demonstrate similar DTA/TG curves, also both of these two testing agents function stable. However, at high temperature of evaporation, H3PO4's initial evaporation temperature, final temperature of pyrolysis and the remains are all obviously higher than that of ZnCl2. For wood dust with the two testing agents, their DTA/TG curves during pyrolysis show similar. At the beginning, they catalyze carbonization and almost finish carbonization at around 200℃. As the temperature goes higher and higher, they enter into main activation duration. At high temperature duration, both of them have evaporation reaction. Besides, there exist differences between them. The suitable activation duration of H3PO4-dust is obviously wider than that of ZnCl2-dust. Meanwhile, the initial evaporation temperature, final temperature of pyrolysis and the remains of the former are higher. All of these approve that the function of H3PO4 protection for carbon is stronger than ZnCl2. For the influences to cellulose pyrolysis, the two testing agents function as the same as to wood dust. Meanwhile, we got that the effects to the cellulose pyrolysis are less different, while those to lignin pyrolysis are more different. H3PO4 affect the whole duration of lignin pyrolysis. However, the effect is less than that to cellulose or wood dust. At the beginning of lignin pyrolysis, ZnCl2 catalyze carbonization reaction, while in medium and later duration little effect is achieved. From the DTA/TG curves and combined with minor carbonization experiment, we got that under this experiment, the best temperature by H3PO4 method is about 400℃, and by ZnCl2 method is about 500℃.

Key words: Activated carbon, Phosphorylation, Zinc chloration, Differential thermal analysis(DTA), Thermogravimetric analysis(TG)