林业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (12): 157-165.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20201218
尹德洁1,布凤琴1,徐艳芳1,黄彪2,李成1,*
收稿日期:
2019-08-16
出版日期:
2020-12-25
发布日期:
2021-01-22
通讯作者:
李成
基金资助:
Dejie Yin1,Fengqin Bu1,Yanfang Xu1,Biao Huang2,Cheng Li1,*
Received:
2019-08-16
Online:
2020-12-25
Published:
2021-01-22
Contact:
Cheng Li
摘要:
目的: 研究单叶蔓荆种子的休眠特性,并探索解除种子休眠的方法,为其人工规模化繁育提供理论依据。方法: 采用果实和种子吸水性的测定,内源萌发抑制物质部位及类型的生物学鉴定、物理手段(浓H2SO4、切割果皮)打破种皮机械阻碍,低温层积和植物激素GA3处理降低抑制剂的浓度等不同方法,研究单叶蔓荆种子休眠的原因、可能存在的休眠类型以及解除种子休眠的方式。结果: 1)单叶蔓荆果皮厚,内果皮有完全木栓化的石细胞层,果实内种子空壳率为26%。单叶蔓荆果皮对果实及内部种子吸水有明显机械阻碍作用,种子没有吸水障碍。2)单叶蔓荆果皮的水浸提液和甲醇浸提液能显著抑制白菜种子萌发和幼苗生长,其中水浸提液的抑制作用比甲醇浸提液更明显;GA3处理后的果皮水浸提液和甲醇浸提液与未浸泡GA3时相比,使白菜种子萌发率、根长和苗高显著提高。种子水浸提液和甲醇浸提液对白菜种子萌发和幼苗生长均没明显抑制作用。以上结果说明,单叶蔓荆果皮中存在水溶性和醇溶性的种子萌发抑制物。3)低温层积90天、GA3、GA3+浓H2SO4、GA3+切割果皮、GA3+低温层积30天、GA3+低温层积60天以及GA3+低温层积90天均可破除单叶蔓荆种子的休眠,促进种子萌发。其中在GA3+浓H2SO4处理下的种子发芽时间最短(14天即可发芽),发芽率最高(44%)。结论: 单叶蔓荆的果皮机械阻碍造成的物理休眠和果皮内源抑制物是影响种子休眠的主要因素。利用500 mg·L-1GA3+浓H2SO4处理能有效解除种子休眠,提高发芽率。
中图分类号:
尹德洁,布凤琴,徐艳芳,黄彪,李成. 单叶蔓荆种子休眠特性与解除方法[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(12): 157-165.
Dejie Yin,Fengqin Bu,Yanfang Xu,Biao Huang,Cheng Li. Dormancy Characteristics and Breaking Methods of Vitex rotundifolia Seeds[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(12): 157-165.
表1
对单叶蔓荆果实的不同试验处理"
序号 No. | 处理 Treatments |
1 | 对照处理CK |
2 | 1 mol·L-1H2SO4浸泡15 min,用蒸馏水冲洗,并用纱布搓掉表面碳化物质Soaking for 15 min in 1 mol·L-1 H2SO4, rinsing with distilled water, and removing the surface carbonized material with gauze |
3 | 对果皮进行切割处理Cutting peel |
4 | 500 mg·L-1 GA3溶液浸泡24 h Soaking in 500 mg·L-1 GA3 solution for 24 h |
5 | 1:1.5的比例混合种子与湿沙,保持沙的含水率为60%并搅拌均匀,放置于4 ℃冰箱进行低温层积处理,层积天数为30天Mixing the seeds and wet sand in a ratio of 1:1.5, keeping the water content of the sand at 60% and stiring evenly, then placing it in a refrigerator at 4 ℃ for low-temperature stratification of 30 days |
6 | 处理同5,层积天数为60天Processing the same as No.5, 60 days of stratification |
7 | 处理同5,层积天数为90天Processing the same as No.5, 90 days of stratification |
8 | 1 mol·L-1浓H2SO4浸泡15 min,用蒸馏水冲洗,并用纱布搓掉表面碳化物质后,500 mg·L-1 GA3溶液浸泡24 h Soaking for 15 min in 1 mol·L-1 H2SO4, rinsing with distilled water, soaking for 24 h with 500 mg·L-1 GA3 after removing the surface carbonized material with gauze |
9 | 对果皮进行切割处理后,500 mg·L-1 GA3溶液浸泡24 h Soaking for 24 h with 500 mg·L-1 GA3 after cutting the peel |
10 | 500 mg·L-1 GA3溶液浸泡24 h后,低温层积设置梯度30天(低温层积方法同5) Low-temperature stratification of 30 days after soaking for 24 h with 500 mg·L-1 GA3 |
11 | 500 mg·L-1 GA3溶液浸泡24 h后,低温层积设置梯度60天(低温层积方法同5) Low-temperature stratification of 60 days after soaking for 24 h with 500 mg·L-1 GA3 |
12 | 500 mg·L-1 GA3溶液浸泡24 h后,低温层积设置梯度90天(低温层积方法同5)Low-temperature stratification of 90 days after soaking for 24 h with 500 mg·L-1 GA3 |
图1
单叶蔓荆果实组织结构及种子萌发 A.完整果实Complete fruit;B.果实横切面Fruit cross section 1: 4粒种子Four seeds;2: 3粒种子Three seeds;3: 2粒种子Two seed;4: 1粒种子One seeds;5:无种子No seeds. C.果实横切面(图中等比例扩大3倍)Fruit cross section (triple the proportion) a.外果皮Exocarp; b.内果皮Endocarp;c.外果皮和内果皮之间排列成环的油点The oil spots are arranged in a ring between exocarp and endocarp;d.种子Seed。D.种子发芽过程Seed germination."
表2
果皮粗提物对白菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响①"
浸提液 Extracts solvent | 浓度Concentration/(g·mL-1) | 发芽率 Germination percentage(%) | 主根长 Root length/cm | 苗高 Seedling height/cm | 内源萌发抑制活性 Germination inhibition activity |
CK | — | 63.33±2.60 a | 2.13±0.37 a | 2.87±0.39 a | |
水Water | 0.01 | 23.00±2.00 b | 1.35±0.060 b | 2.08±0.45 a | 63.68±3.16 b |
0.05 | 22.33±1.20 b | 1.35±0.12 b | 2.03±0.13 b | 64.73±1.90 b | |
0.1 | 19.67±3.48 c | 1.33±0.41 b | 1.99±0.081 b | 68.95±5.50 a | |
甲醇Methanol | 0.01 | 24.67±0.67 b | 1.75±0.059 ab | 2.45±0.094 ab | 61.05±1.05 b |
0.05 | 23.98±1.20 b | 1.39±0.18 b | 2.07±0.16 b | 62.13±1.90 b | |
0.1 | 22.33±1.45 b | 1.31±0.14 b | 2.01±0.10 b | 64.73±2.29 a |
表3
GA3处理后不同浸提液对白菜种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响"
浸提液 Extracts solvent | 浓度Concentration/(g·mL-1) | 发芽率 Germination percentage (%) | 主根长 Root length/cm | 苗高 Seedling height/cm |
CK | — | 63.33±2.60 a | 2.13±0.37 a | 2.87±0.39 a |
水Water | 0.01 | 46.25±1.36 b | 1.54±0.090 b | 2.26±0.29 ab |
0.05 | 38.74±0.97 b | 1.48±0.15 b | 2.20±0.37 b | |
0.10 | 34.19±1.12 b | 1.43±0.26 b | 2.01±0.092 b | |
甲醇Methanol | 0.01 | 51.82±2.73 b | 1.87±0.13 ab | 2.57±0.087 a |
0.05 | 42.59±1.72 b | 1.69±0.17 b | 2.21±0.19 ab | |
0.10 | 38.65±0.65 b | 1.57±0.078 b | 2.18±0.13 ab |
表4
不同处理对单叶蔓荆种子萌发的影响"
处理 Treatment | 发芽开始天数 Days beginning/d | 发芽率 Germination percentage(GR)(%) | 发芽势 Germination potential(GP)(%) | 发芽指数 Germination index (GI) | 活力指数 Vitality index (Ⅵ) |
CK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 mol·L-1H2SO41 mol·L-1H2SO4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
切割果皮Cutting peel | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
低温层积30天Low temperature layering 30 d | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
低温层积60天Low temperature layering 60 d | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
低温层积90天Low temperature layering 90 d | 25 | 16.00±1.15 d | 12.00±1.15 c | 3.20±0.17 f | 1.28±0.086 g |
GA3 | 18 | 22.67±0.67 c | 15.33±0.67 bc | 6.84±0.17 c | 4.96±0.058 c |
GA3+1 mol·L-1浓H2SO4 GA3+1 mol·L-1 H2SO4 | 14 | 44.00±1.15 a | 28.67±1.76 a | 8.92±0.17 a | 8.33±0.075 a |
GA3+切割果皮GA3+ Cutting peel | 15 | 33.33±1.76 b | 20.00±2.31 b | 6.13±0.17 d | 3.50±0.18 d |
GA3+低温层积30天GA3+low temperature layering 30 d | 19 | 19.33±1.76 cd | 14.00±1.15 c | 4.17±0.27 e | 1.75±0.055 f |
GA3+低温层积60天GA3+low temperature layering 60 d | 19 | 21.33±1.76 c | 16.00±1.15 bc | 4.34±0.097 e | 2.16±0.21 e |
GA3+低温层积90天GA3+low temperature layering 90 d | 17 | 36.00±1.15 b | 24.67±1.76 a | 8.34±0.16 b | 7.25±0.10 b |
曹晓晓, 王奎玲, 刘庆超, 等. 2011.单叶蔓荆繁殖方式研究.银川: 中国园艺学会观赏园艺专业委员会2011年学术年会. | |
Cao X X, Wang K L, Liu Q C, et al. 2011. Research on reproduction pattern of Vitex trifolia var. simplicifolia. Yinchuan: China Horticultural Society Ornamental Horticulture Committee 2011 Academic Annual Meeting.[in Chinese] | |
常宗涛, 胡胜云, 杜楠楠, 等. 沙质海岸防护林树种单叶蔓荆个体生态学研究综述. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44 (27): 160- 161.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.27.055 |
|
Chang Z T , Hu S Y , Du N N , et al. Review of autecology of Vitex trifolia var. simplicifolia for coastal sandy shelter forest. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44 (27): 160- 161.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.27.055 |
|
陈怀远, 涂林锋, 肖春荣, 等. 单叶蔓荆子的化学成分研究. 中国中药杂志, 2018, 43 (18): 3694- 3700. | |
Chen H Y , Tu L F , Xiao C R , et al. Chemical constituents from fruits of Vitex trifolia var. simplicifolia. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2018, 43 (18): 3694- 3700. | |
付婷婷, 程红焱, 宋松泉. 种子休眠的研究进展. 植物学报, 2009, 44 (5): 629- 641.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2009.05.014 |
|
Fu T T , Cheng H Y , Song S Q . Advances in studies of seed dormancy. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2009, 44 (5): 629- 641.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2009.05.014 |
|
洑香香, 周晓东, 刘红娜, 等. 木本植物种子休眠和萌发的分子生物学研究综述. 世界林业研究, 2011, 24 (4): 24- 29. | |
Fu X X , Zhou X D , Liu H N , et al. Review of seed dormancy and germination of woody plant in molecular biology. World Forestry Research, 2011, 24 (4): 24- 29. | |
古今, 吴梅, 李文春, 等. 滇重楼种子中萌发抑制物质活性的研究. 现代中药研究与实践, 2013, (1): 10- 12. | |
Gu J , Wu M , Li W C , et al. Study on the activity of germination inhibitors in the seeds of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Research and Practice of Chinese Medicines, 2013, (1): 10- 12. | |
郭聪聪, 沈永宝, 史锋厚. 白皮松种子休眠研究进展. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2019, 43 (2): 175- 183. | |
Guo C C , Shen Y B , Shi F H . Review on seed dormancy of Pinus bungeana Zucc. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition, 2019, 43 (2): 175- 183. | |
黄玮, 孟繁蕴, 张文生, 等. 滇重楼种子休眠机理研究. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24 (12): 242- 246. | |
Huang W , Meng F Y , Zhang W S , et al. Study on seed dormancy mechanism of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2008, 24 (12): 242- 246. | |
刘超, 伏秦超, 罗正敏, 等. 肉果秤锤树核果中萌发抑制物质的初步研究. 北方园艺, 2013, (4): 20- 24. | |
Liu C , Fu Q C , Luo Z M , et al. Preliminary study on germination inhibitors from Sinojackia sarcocarpa drupe. Northern Horticulture, 2013, (4): 20- 24. | |
潘昊磊, 赵毅, 石文昊, 等. 牡丹种子休眠与萌发综述. 现代农业科技, 2019, (20): 128- 129, 131.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2019.20.076 |
|
Pan H L , Zhao Y , Shi W H , et al. A review of peony seed dormancy and germination. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, (20): 128- 129, 131.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2019.20.076 |
|
乔勇进, 张敦论, 郗金标, 等. 沿海沙质海岸单叶蔓荆群落特点及土壤改良的分析. 防护林科技, 2001, (4): 6- 8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2001.04.002 |
|
Qiao Y J , Zhang D L , Xi J B , et al. Analysis of soil improvement and community features of Vitex trifolia var. simplicifolia on the sandy coast. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 2001, (4): 6- 8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2001.04.002 |
|
尚旭岚, 徐锡增, 方升佐. 青钱柳种子休眠机制. 林业科学, 2011, 47 (3): 68- 74. | |
Shang X L , Xu X Z , Fang S Z . Seed dormancy mechanism of Cyclocarya paliurus. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47 (3): 68- 74. | |
苏贺. 2016.巫山淫羊藿种子休眠机制及解除方法研究.北京: 中国农业大学博士学位论文. | |
Su H. 2016. Study on seed dormancy mechanism and dissolution method of Epimedium wushanense. Beijing: PhD thesis of China Agricultural University.[in Chinese] | |
孙荣进, 罗光明. 单叶蔓荆种子休眠特性研究. 中草药, 2012, 43 (8): 1621- 1625. | |
Sun R J , Luo G M . Seed dormancy characteristics for Vitex trifolia var. simplicifolia. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2012, 43 (8): 1621- 1625. | |
孙婷, 刘鹏, 徐根娣. 栝楼种子休眠特性分析. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41 (12): 4273- 4280.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.12.044 |
|
Sun T , Liu P , Xu G D . Study on dormancy characteristics of Trichosathes kirilowii Maxim. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41 (12): 4273- 4280.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.12.044 |
|
孙云波, 陈翔, 陈垣, 等. 种荚预处理对红芪种子发芽特性的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24 (6): 159- 167. | |
Sun Y B , Chen X , Chen H , et al. Effects of pod pre-treatments on the germination traits of Hedysarum polybotrys seeds. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24 (6): 159- 167. | |
唐安军. 中国特有植物凹叶木兰种子的休眠与贮藏行为. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50 (1): 105- 110. | |
Tang A J . Seed dormancy and storage behavior of Magnolia sargentiana endemic to China. Plant Physiology Journal, 2014, 50 (1): 105- 110. | |
王世杰, 莫颖宁. 栝楼种子休眠与促萌发研究进展. 中医药导报, 2018, 24 (15): 118- 120. | |
Wang S J , Mo Y N . Research progress of dormancy and germination promotion of Gualou(Trichosanthes Kirilowii Maxim)seed. Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, 2018, 24 (15): 118- 120. | |
王小平, 王九龄. 白皮松种子内含物的提取、分离及生物测定. 种子, 1998, 17 (5): 19- 22. | |
Wang X P , Wang J L . Extraction, separation and biological measurement of endogenous growth regulating substance of seeds of Pinus bungeana. Seed, 1998, 17 (5): 19- 22. | |
魏宗贤, 周赛霞, 彭焱松, 等. 鄱阳湖沙地沙漠化过程中单叶蔓荆群落结构和功能特征. 广西植物, 2011, 31 (5): 620- 626.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2011.05.011 |
|
Wei Z X , Zhou S X , Peng Y S , et al. Characterication of construction and functions of Vitex trifolia var. simplicifolia community during the process of desertification in Poyang Lake. Guihaia, 2011, 31 (5): 620- 626.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2011.05.011 |
|
徐向东, 董丽莉, 卢晓燕, 等. 黄山花楸果实水浸提液的萌发抑制作用. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42 (29): 10183- 10184.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.29.053 |
|
Xu X D , Dong L L , Lu X Y , et al. The inhibition of aqueous extracts of Sorbus amabilis fruit on seeds germination. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42 (29): 10183- 10184.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.29.053 |
|
闫芳, 张恩和, 王勤礼, 等. 野生黄瑞香种子的休眠机制与破除方法. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (4): 30- 37. | |
Yan F , Zhang E H , Wang Q L , et al. The mechanisms of seed dormancy of wild Daphne giraldii and methods for dormancy breaking. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (4): 30- 37. | |
颜启传. 种子学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 64- 71. | |
Yan Q C . Seeds. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2001: 64- 71. | |
颜升, 罗光明, 朱玉野, 等. 栀子种子萌发条件优化及萌发抑制物的初步研究. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45 (3): 376- 382.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2014.3.376 |
|
Yan S , Luo G M , Zhu Y Y , et al. Optimization of seed germination and detection of germination inhibitors in gardenia fruits. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2014, 45 (3): 376- 382.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2014.3.376 |
|
于卓, 王林和. 三种沙拐枣种子休眠原因研究初探. 西北林学院学报, 1998, 13 (3): 9- 13. | |
Yu Z , Wang L H . Causes of seed dormancy of three species of Calligonum. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 1998, 13 (3): 9- 13. | |
张丹, 张金政, 孙国峰, 等. 细叶鸢尾种子休眠原因及解除休眠的方法研究. 草业学报, 2011, 20 (6): 109- 117. | |
Zhang D , Zhang J Z , Sun G F , et al. A study on the causes of Iris tenuifolin dormancy and the methods for breaking dormancy. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20 (6): 109- 117. | |
张瑞, 李廷山, 胡小文, 等. 窄叶野碗豆种子的休眠与发芽特性. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34 (1): 135- 142. | |
Zhang R , Li T S , Hu X W , et al. Seed dormancy and germination characteristics of Vicia angustifolia. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34 (1): 135- 142. | |
朱敏嘉, 黄俊华, 杨文英, 等. 裕民贝母种子形态休眠解除过程中营养物质的动态变化. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47 (11): 182- 186. | |
Zhu M J , Huang J H , Yang W Y , et al. Dynamic changes of nutrients during Fritillaria imperialis seed form dormancy release. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47 (11): 182- 186. | |
Baskin C C, Baskin J M. 2004. Determining dormancy-breaking and germination requirements from the fewest seeds. Washington: Island Press, 162-179. | |
Baskin J M , Baskin C C . A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Science Research, 2004, 14 (1): 1- 16.
doi: 10.1079/SSR2003150 |
|
Carrick K M , Plyler D B . Interaction of fusicoccin and abscisic acid in breaking and restoring seed dormancy in Spartina alterniflora. ASB Bulletin Association of Southeastern Biologists, 1994, 41 (2): 82. | |
Debeaujon I , Koornneef M . Gibberellin requirement for Arabidopsis seed germination is determined both by testa characteristics and embryonic abscisic acid. Plant Physiology, 2000, 122 (2): 415- 424.
doi: 10.1104/pp.122.2.415 |
|
Gusano M G , Gomez P M , Dicenta F . Breaking seed dormancy in almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A.Webb). Scientia Horticulturae, 2004, 99 (1): 363- 370. | |
Kermode A R . Role of abscisic acid in seed dormancy. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2005, 24 (7): 319- 344. | |
Nikolaeva M G . Factors controlling the seed dormancy pattern. Physiology and Biochemistry of Seed Dormancy and Germination, 1977, 57 (3): 51- 74. | |
Roberts E H . Seeds:Physiology of development and germination. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1986, 9 (4): 356. | |
Walck J L , Hidayati S N , Okagami N . Seed germination ecophysiology of the Asian species Osmorhiza aristata (Apiaceae):comparison with its North American congeners and implications for evolution of types of dormancy. American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89 (5): 829- 835.
doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.5.829 |
[1] | 陈香波, 刘杨, 赵明水, 涂淑萍. 极度濒危树种羊角槭的种胚发育与休眠解除[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(4): 65-73. |
[2] | 闫芳, 张恩和, 王勤礼, 毛著鸿. 野生黄瑞香种子的休眠机制与破除方法[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(4): 30-37. |
[3] | 解卫海, 刘丹, 孙金利, 张萍, 朱建军. 脱水和高氧压过程中单叶蔓荆叶片细胞膜透性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(6): 44-49. |
[4] | 朱振家, 姜成英, 史艳虎, 陈炜青, 陈年来, 赵梦炯, 吴文俊. 油橄榄成花诱导与花芽分化期间侧芽内源激素含量变化[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(11): 32-39. |
[5] | 刘艳;李庆梅;刘广全;;刘勇;侯龙鱼;李国雷. 麻栎种子萌发的抑制机制[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(9): 164-170. |
[6] | 魏志刚;钱婷婷;张凯旋;刘关君;刘桂丰;杨传平. 外源GA3对白桦成花基因影响的定量PCR分析[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(7): 187-192. |
[7] | 尚旭岚;徐锡增;方升佐. 青钱柳种子休眠机制[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(3): 68-74. |
[8] | 张汝民 白静 吕春玲 陈宏伟 高岩. 变温层积处理诱导肉苁蓉种子的萌发[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(9): 170-173. |
[9] | 沈海龙 杨玲 张建瑛 冯丹丹 范少辉. 花楸树种子休眠影响因素与萌发特性研究[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(10): 133-138. |
[10] | 裴东 张俊佩 石永森 徐虎智. 层积催芽对美国黑核桃种子发芽和苗木生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38(5): 73-77. |
[11] | 季孔庶,王章荣,陈天华,王明庥. 马尾松插穗内源抑制物质的研究*[J]. 林业科学, 1997, 33(2): 142-151. |
[12] | 徐化成 唐季林. 油松种子发芽的生态学及其与种源的关系[J]. , 1989, 25(6): 492-501. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||