欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2007, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (06): 1-6.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20070601

• 论文及研究报告 •    下一篇

不同年龄阶段杉木人工林生态系统的径流规律

邓湘雯 康文星 田大伦 项文化 闫文德   

  1. 中南林业科技大学生态研究室,长沙410004
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-06-25 发布日期:2007-06-25

Runoff Changes in Chinese Fir Plantations at Different Age Classes,Huitong,Hunan Province

Deng Xiangwen,Kang Wenxing,Tian Dalun,Xiang Wenhua,Yan Wende   

  1. Research Section of Ecology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology Changsha 410004
  • Received:2006-01-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-06-25 Published:2007-06-25

摘要:

利用1988—2004年17年的水文观测数据,对湖南会同生态站不同年龄阶段杉木人工林的径流特征进行研究。结果表明:Ⅰ龄级杉木人工林受抚育等经营措施的影响,地表径流量最小,年均地表径流系数为0.0071。抚育停止后,地表径流增加。到第Ⅲ龄级时,地表径流系数达到最大值,为0.0184。第Ⅳ龄级开始,地表径流逐渐减少,地表径流系数为0.0098,为第Ⅲ龄级的50%左右。Ⅰ龄级杉木林的地下径流最大,地下径流系数0.3012,为采伐前成熟林(0.1577)的2倍。随着林分年龄增大,受林冠截留、土壤结构改善和蒸腾作用等方面的影响,地下径流逐渐减少,到第Ⅳ龄级时径流系数为0.2082,为第Ⅰ龄级的65.8%。Ⅲ集水区径流输出以地下径流为主,地表径流量只占总径流量的2.3%~7.9%。不同龄级径流的月变化规律和降水量一致,降水量大的月份,径流量也大,4—8月的降水量占年总降水量的62.2%,径流量占年总径流量的75.4%,其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ龄级在4—8月的平均径流系数分别为0.3784、0.3224、0.2790和0.2634。逐步回归筛选后,影响月平均径流量的主要因子为月平均降水量和林龄。3次多项式的回归模型能较好地拟合各龄级月降雨量与月径流量的关系。

关键词: 杉木人工林, 林龄, 地表径流, 地下径流, 径流系数, 回归模型

Abstract:

Based on the data collected for 17-years successive observation at Huitong National Key Field Scientific Experiment and Research Station, runoff changes in Chinese Fir plantations at different age classes were investigated. Results showed: Due to tending treatment (e.g. site preparation and weeding), the surface runoff in the stand at the age from 1 to 5 year (age class I) was the smallest among all age classes and the annual average surface runoff coefficient accounted for 0.007 1. However, the surface runoff increased with age class increase after tending treatments and reached the maximum value at the stand age from 10 to 15 year (age class III ), with annual average surface runoff coefficient of 0.18 4. A decline in surface runoff was found at the stand age from 15 to 20 year (age class IV). The annual average surface runoff coefficient was 0.009 8 and approximated to 50% of the stand at the age class III. The underground runoff gradually decreased with stand age class increase. The highest underground runoff coefficient of 0.301 2 occurred at the age class I, which was about 2 times of that in the mature stand before clear cutting (0.157 7). The underground runoff coefficient at stand age class IV declined to 0.208 2, about 65.8% of that at the age class I . The decrease of annual average underground runoff coefficient as stand growth was attributed to increase in interception and transpiration because of canopy development, and improvements in soil structure. The surface runoff only accounted for 2.3% to 7.% of the total runoff and underground runoff is the dominated pathway of watershed. The monthly runoff of all the age classes was proportional to the mean monthly rainfall. The rainfall during the period from April to August was 62.2% of the total annual rainfall and the runoff was amounted to 75.4% of the annual runoff. The average runoff coefficients from April to August were estimated to be 0.378 4, 0.322 4, 0.279 0 and 0.263 4 for the stand age class I, II, III and IV, respectively. The result of stepwise regression indicated that the monthly precipitation and stand age of the stand influenced the monthly runoff. The established multinomial regression equations could be used to forecast the monthly runoff.

Key words: Chinese Fir plantation, stand age, surface runoff, underground runoff, runoff coefficient, regression model