欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2006, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 93-100.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20060417

• 综合评述 • 上一篇    下一篇

森林凋落物分解研究进展

郭剑芬1,2 杨玉盛1 陈光水1 林鹏2 谢锦升3   

  1. 1.福建师范大学地理科学学院,福州350007;2.厦门大学生命科学学院厦门361005;3.福建农林大学林学院,福州350002
  • 收稿日期:2004-08-31 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-04-25 发布日期:2006-04-25

A Review on Litter Decomposition in Forest Ecosystem

Guo Jianfen1,2,Yang Yusheng1,Chen Guangshui1,Lin Peng2,Xie Jinsheng3   

  1. 1. College of Geography Science, Fujian Normal University Fuzhou 350007; 2. Life Science College of Xiamen University Xiamen 361005;3. Forestry College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Fuzhou 350002
  • Received:2004-08-31 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2006-04-25 Published:2006-04-25

摘要:

系统评述森林凋落物的分解过程、凋落物分解及养分释放的影响因素、分解研究的方法等。森林凋落物的分解既有物理过程,又有生物化学过程,一般由淋溶、自然粉碎、代谢作用等共同完成。凋落物分解过程先后出现分解速率较快和较慢2个阶段,元素迁移一般呈现淋溶-富集-释放的模式。凋落物分解主要受气候、凋落物性质、微生物和土壤动物的影响,气候是最基本的影响因素,常用实际蒸散(actual evapotranspiration 简称AET)作为指标。凋落物分解速率呈明显的气候地带性,与温度、湿度等紧密相关。从全球尺度来讲,凋落物质量对分解速率的影响处于次要地位,但在同一气候带内因AET变化较小,则起了主导作用。N、P和木质素浓度、C/N、C/P、木质素与养分比值是常见的凋落物质量指标,其中C/N和木质素/N最能反映凋落物分解速率。凋落物化学性质对其分解的影响作用又与分解阶段有关。凋落叶中N、P、K初始浓度高使得初期分解较快,而后期分解放慢。土壤理化性质及微生物区系也将不同程度地影响凋落物分解。尼龙网袋法(litter bag method)操作简单,是野外测定森林凋落物分解速率最常用的方法。除此之外,缩微试验也得到了广泛应用。目前普遍采用的衡量凋落物分解速率大小的指标主要有CO2释放速率、凋落物分解系数(k值)及质量损失率。在此基础上提出了指数衰减、线性回归等模型来模拟凋落物分解过程。尽管对凋落物分解在森林生态系统C、N、P循环、土壤肥力维持等方面已进行了较深入的研究,但未来研究应侧重以下方向:长期的定位观测;采用相对统一的研究方法,获得可比性强的数据进行综合;深化凋落物分解机理研究;探讨全球气候变化对森林凋落物分解的影响;评价营林措施(如林分皆伐、造林、施石灰和肥料等)对凋落物分解与养分释放的调节作用。

关键词: 森林生态系统, 凋落物, 分解

Abstract:

Decomposition of forest litter and simultaneous release of bioelements is one of the fundamental pathway of the flow of nutrient and energy in forest ecosystems, and an important component of the global carbon budget. The aim of this review is to summarize the changes of nutrient and chemical components during the decomposition, the factors controlling litter decay rate and its measurement. Decomposition of plant litter refers to the physical and chemical processes involved in reducing litter to its elemental chemical constituents. It includes two stages. First, litter is broken down by detritivores to small pieces which can be chemically reduced. Second, through the activities of micro-organisms (bacteria and fungi) these small pieces of organic matter are further reduced and mineralized into basic inorganic molecules. Also the course of nutrient dynamics during decomposition often can occur in three sequential phases, including an initial nutrient release through leaching, a net immobilization of nutrients by decomposer microorganisms and nutrient release from the litter, usually at a rate paralleling mass loss. However, the pattern of immobilization and release varies among species and ecosystems, and any particular litter type may not show all three phases. Litter decomposition rates are controlled by climate, litter chemistry, and by soil organisms. Climate has a direct effect on litter decomposition due to the effects of temperature and moisture. However, as a result of the climatic control of soil formation and nutrient cycling, it is to be expected that climate also has an indirect effect through the climatic impact on litter chemistry. Actual evapotranspiration (AET) is used as an index for the climatic control on decomposition. Mean AET in the humid tropical region is higher than in both the temperate and the mediterranean region and this results in rapid decomposition of litter. Especially, decomposition of litter (including root litter) contributes about 70% to the total annual carbon flux. Thus, changes in AET due to global warming will affect the global carbon budget through effects on the decomposition pathway. At a global scale, litter chemistry is only of secondary importance in explaining variation in litter decomposition rates. N and P concentrations, C/N and C/P ratios, lignin concentration and lignin/N and lignin/P ratios are considered as primary litter chemistry parameters, of which the lignin/N ratio and P related parameters exert significant influence on litter decomposition rates in the tropics. However, there is no consistent chemical predictor of litter decomposability in the temperate region. Also, there are indications that the chemical control of litter decomposition depends on the phase of the decomposition process. Generally, readily decomposable carbohydrates are lost at the initial stage, subsequently the decay-resistant materials such as lignin and cellulose are accumulated. High initial N, P and K concentrations lead to high initial decay rates, but to low long-term litter decay. Thus, there is clearly a need for more long-term studies on the chemical control of litter decomposition rates in various climatic regions. In addition, physical and chemical properties of soils and microbial communities also affect litter decomposition. Litter bag represent the most standardized method for studying litter decomposition, but it has several limitations. Litter bag may alter decomposition rates by altering litter microclimate, hindering soil contact and excluding litter macrofauna. Nevertheless, litter bags allow comparisons among species and experimental manipulations. Currently, the three most widely used indices of litter decomposition rate in forest ecosystem are release rate of CO2, decay constant of k value and weight loss rate of litter. Despite intensive research in the last decade, uncertainties of litter decomposition in forest ecosystems still remain for further studies: long-term in situ observation; use of uniform methods to obtain comparable data; research on the mechanism of litter decay using models; the effects of global climatic changes on litter decomposition in forest ecosystems; and the assessment of management activities controls on the litter decay and nutrient release in forests.

Key words: forest ecosystem, litter fall, decomposition