林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (10): 181-195.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20260031
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
马盼盼1,3,方曼钰1,谢天竣1,谢锦秋1,肖鹏1,王菲彬2,五十田博3,阙泽利1,*(
)
收稿日期:2026-01-16
出版日期:2026-10-10
发布日期:2026-10-16
通讯作者:
阙泽利
E-mail:zelique@njfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Panpan Ma1,3,Manyu Fang1,Tianjun Xie1,Jinqiu Xie1,Peng Xiao1,Feibin Wang2,Hiroshi Isoda3,Zeli Que1,*(
)
Received:2026-01-16
Online:2026-10-10
Published:2026-10-16
Contact:
Zeli Que
E-mail:zelique@njfu.edu.cn
摘要:
目的: 探究材料感官特征对人体心理和生理恢复的影响,分析环境主观印象和舒适度感知在恢复过程中的调节作用,为理解真实室内环境中恢复效应的形成机制提供实证支持,并为亲生物建筑中木质材料的科学选用和设计应用提供理论依据与实践参考。方法: 以涂饰和未涂饰的杉木墙板作为视觉刺激、杉木板和浸渍纸贴面刨花板作为触觉刺激,构建3种在舒适度感知上存在明显差异的视触觉环境,并设置由乳胶漆墙面和瓷砖组成的对照环境。招募64名参与者,记录其完成认知任务后的心电和皮肤电信号,采用状态?焦虑量表、主观活力量表和恢复结果量表评估心理恢复水平,通过李克特量表获取环境感知评价。应用方差分析、非参数检验和Spearman秩相关分析比较不同环境条件下的身心反应差异,并检验生理指标与主观评价之间的相关关系。结果: 与对照环境相比,木质环境的视触觉短时交互显著增强副交感神经活动,心率变异性的高频成分(HF)和相邻正常窦性心搏间期差值的均方根(RMSSD)均较基线期升高,且幅值显著大于对照环境(P<0.05)。墙面涂饰引起的光泽度差异未导致显著生理变化(P>0.05)。触摸浸渍纸贴面刨花板显著降低皮肤电导水平(SCL)(P<0.05),但未显著影响环境自然感评价(P>0.05)。心理恢复指标与自然感、舒适度和喜好度评价呈正相关(P<0.05),HF和RMSSD升高亦与自然感和喜好度评价显著相关(P<0.05)。结论: 真实木质环境的视触觉短时交互可促进认知任务后的心理和自主神经恢复,其效应不仅与材料的感官属性相关,还受个体对环境整体舒适度和印象的主观感知调节。同时,自主神经的变化具有感官特异性特征,视觉刺激增强副交感神经活动,触觉刺激调节皮肤交感神经活性,提示恢复效应并非仅由自然感知驱动,而是由视觉诱导的心理放松和触觉介导的生理调节协同塑造。
中图分类号:
马盼盼,方曼钰,谢天竣,谢锦秋,肖鹏,王菲彬,五十田博,阙泽利. 木质环境的视触觉短时交互对人体心理和生理恢复的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(10): 181-195.
Panpan Ma,Manyu Fang,Tianjun Xie,Jinqiu Xie,Peng Xiao,Feibin Wang,Hiroshi Isoda,Zeli Que. Effects of Short-Term Visual-Tactile Interaction in Wooden Environments on Human Psychological and Physiological Restoration[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(10): 181-195.
表1
各组视触觉刺激设置"
| 组别Group | 视觉刺激Visual stimulus | 光泽度 Glossiness (GU) | 触觉刺激Tactile stimulus | 粗糙度Roughness (Ra)/μm | ||
| 顺纹 Parallel-grain | 横纹 Cross-grain | |||||
| VU-TF (n=16) | 杉木墙面(未涂饰)Uncoated fir wall | 6.40 | 杉木Chinese fir board | 3.23 | 9.57 | |
| VC-TF (n=16) | 杉木墙面(涂饰)Coated fir wall | 51.12 | 杉木Chinese fir board | 3.23 | 9.57 | |
| VC-TP (n=16) | 杉木墙面(涂饰)Coated fir wall | 51.12 | 浸渍纸贴面刨花板Paper-overlaid particleboard | 1.31 | 5.48 | |
| VL-TT (n=16) | 白乳胶漆墙面 Latex-painted wall | 2.10 | 瓷砖Tile | 0.57 | ||
表3
心理、生理测量指标汇总"
| 类别Category | 指标Index | 表征Characterization |
| 心率变异性Heart rate variability (HRV) | HF | 副交感神经活动水平Parasympathetic nervous activity level |
| LF/HF | 交感?副交感神经相对平衡Sympathetic-parasympathetic balance ratio | |
| SDNN | 整体自主神经调节水平Overall autonomic regulatory capacity | |
| RMSSD | 副交感神经活动水平Parasympathetic nervous activity level | |
| 皮肤电活动Electrodermal activity (EDA) | SCL | 交感神经基础唤醒水平Sympathetic basal arousal level |
| SCR | 瞬时刺激诱发的交感神经反应Transient stimulus-induced sympathetic response | |
| 环境感官评价Environmental sensory evaluation | SD | 环境印象评价Environmental impression evaluation |
| IRCS-Extent | 环境主观延展感评价Subjective environmental spaciousness perception | |
| 认知疲劳诱发Cognitive fatigue induction | Stroop | 抑制控制能力Inhibitory control ability |
| OSPAN | 工作记忆容量Working memory capacity | |
| 恢复状态评价Restorative state evaluation | STAI-6 | 状态焦虑水平State anxiety level |
| SVS | 主观活力水平Subjective vitality level | |
| ROS | 恢复结果Restorative outcome | |
| VAS | 主观压力水平Subjective stress level |
表S1
感官评价所用双极形容词对"
| 视觉特性 Visual characteristics | 触觉特性 Tactile characteristics | 情感与偏好评价 Affective-preference evaluation | |
| 哑光?亮光 Matte-glossy | 粗糙?光滑 Rough-smooth | 旧?新 Old-new | 讨厌?喜欢 Dislik-like |
| 对比弱? 对比强 Low contrast- high contrast | 硬?软 Hard-soft | 人工?天然 Artificial-natural | 脏?干净 Dirty-clean |
| 暗?亮 Dark-bright | 冷?暖 Cold-warm | 粗劣?精致 Unrefined-elegant | 紧张?放松 Tense-relaxed |
| 厚?薄 Thick -thin | 不舒服?舒服 Uncomfortable- comfortable | 廉价?昂贵 Cheap-expensive | |
| 黏手?顺滑 Sticky-slippery | 联想到自然? 不能联想自然 Can associate with natural environment- cannot associate with natural environment | 常见?稀有 Common-rare | |
| 李 坚, 甘文涛, 陈志俊, 等. 向新出发, 木材科学前沿发展. 森林工程, 2025, 41 (1): 1- 39. | |
| Li J, Gan W T, Chen Z J, et al. Frontier advances in wood science towards a new departure. Forest Engineering, 2025, 41 (1): 1- 39. | |
| 李 静, 徐洪澎, 张 超, 等. 高校室内木质化空间的心理增益探析. 世界建筑, 2024, (2): 58- 63. | |
| Li J, Xu H P, Zhang C, et al. Discussion on the psychological beneflts of wooden interior spaces on university campuses. World Architecture, 2024, (2): 58- 63. | |
| 张 悦, 李 超, 郭叶莹子, 等. 木材的视觉刺激及人体心理生理响应研究进展. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44 (6): 156- 166. | |
| Zhang Y, Li C, Guo-Ye Y Z, et al. Research development on human psychological and physiological responses to visual stimulation of wood. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44 (6): 156- 166. | |
|
Chen J, Chen G M. Academic burnout among Chinese college students: a study based on FSQCA method. Acta Psychologica, 2025a, 253, 104701.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104701 |
|
|
Chen X, Duan W T, Liu Y, et al. The influence of material and spatial size on indoor environment preference evaluation. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 2025b, 24 (3): 1112- 1122.
doi: 10.1080/13467581.2023.2278447 |
|
|
Davidovic M, Starck G, Olausson H. Processing of affective and emotionally neutral tactile stimuli in the insular cortex. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2019, 35, 94- 103.
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.12.006 |
|
|
Du Q Y, Liu H W, Yang C J, et al. The development of a short Chinese version of the state-trait anxiety inventory. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2022, 13, 854547.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.854547 |
|
|
Gong Z X, Zhou M, Dai Y X, et al. A large-scale fMRI dataset for the visual processing of naturalistic scenes. Scientific Data, 2023, 10, 559.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02471-x |
|
|
Habay J, Arenales Arauz Y L, Proost M, et al. Mental fatigue negatively impacts cognitive and physical performance outcomes: a large-scale randomized crossover trial. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2026, 58 (2): 225- 241.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003852 |
|
|
Hu Q W, Li X H, Fang H, et al. The tactile perception evaluation of wood surface with different roughness and shapes: a study using galvanic skin response. Wood Research, 2022, 67 (2): 311- 325.
doi: 10.37763/wr.1336-4561/67.2.311325 |
|
|
Ikei H, Nakamura M, Miyazaki Y. Physiological effects of visual stimulation using knotty and clear wood images among young women. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (23): 9898.
doi: 10.3390/su12239898 |
|
|
Ikei H, Song C, Miyazaki Y. Physiological effects of touching wood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017, 14 (7): 801.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070801 |
|
|
Kumpulainen S, Kilpiäinen M, Koski J, et al. Wooden interiors improve heart rate variability-derived psychophysiological well-being: an acute cross-over study. Environment and Behavior, 2024, 56 (3/4): 155- 178.
doi: 10.1177/00139165241270631 |
|
|
Laborde S, Mosley E, Thayer J F. Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research-recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, 8, 213.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00213 |
|
|
Lesage F X, Berjot S. Validity of occupational stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occupational Medicine, 2011, 61 (6): 434- 436.
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr037 |
|
|
Ma P P, Shi Q, Xie T J, et al. Materials selection in biophilic building design: multisensory perception and psycho-physical mapping of wood materials. Buildings, 2026, 16 (4): 726.
doi: 10.3390/buildings16040726 |
|
|
Makowski D, Pham T, Lau Z J, et al. NeuroKit2: a Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior Research Methods, 2021, 53 (4): 1689- 1696.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y |
|
|
Marteau T M, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State: Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1992, 31 (3): 301- 306.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x |
|
|
Nakamura M, Ikei H, Miyazaki Y. Effects of visual stimulation using wooden-wall images with different amounts of knots on psychological and physiological responses. Wood Science and Technology, 2022, 56 (6): 1869- 1886.
doi: 10.1007/s00226-022-01419-5 |
|
|
Nakanishi E Y, Poulin P, Blanchet P, et al. A systematic review of the implications of construction materials on occupants’ physical and psychological health. Building and Environment, 2024, 257, 111527.
doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111527 |
|
|
Personeni G, Savescu A. Ecological validity of virtual reality simulations in workstation health and safety assessment. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 2023, 4, 1058790.
doi: 10.3389/frvir.2023.1058790 |
|
|
Queirolo L, Fazia T, Roccon A, et al. Effects of forest bathing (shinrin-yoku) in stressed people. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15, 1458418.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1458418 |
|
|
Rolls E T. Two what, two where, visual cortical streams in humans. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2024, 160, 105650.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105650 |
|
|
Rolls E T. Hippocampal revolutions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2026, 180, 106492.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106492 |
|
|
Ryan R M, Frederick C. On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 1997, 65 (3): 529- 565.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x |
|
| Sheth C, McGlade E, Yurgelun-Todd D. 2017. Chronic stress in adolescents and its neurobiological and psychopathological consequences: an RDoC perspective. Chronic Stress, 1: 2470547017715645. | |
|
Shibata S, Tokuhiro K, Ikeuchi A, et al. Visual properties and perceived restorativeness in green offices: a photographic evaluation of office environments with various degrees of greening. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15, 1443540.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1443540 |
|
|
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation, 1996, 93 (5): 1043- 1065.
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043 |
|
| Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2011, 2, 53- 55. | |
|
Taylor A G, Goehler L E, Galper D I, et al. Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in mind-body medicine: development of an integrative framework for psychophysiological research. Explore, 2010, 6 (1): 29- 41.
doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2009.10.004 |
|
|
Tsunetsugu Y, Matsubara E, Sugiyama M. Evaluation of the impact of wooden living environments on humans. Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 2017, 63 (1): 1- 13.
doi: 10.2488/jwrs.63.1 |
|
|
Tsunetsugu Y, Sugiyama M. Heat transfer, physiological responses, and subjective perceptions during short contact time with wood or other materials. Journal of Wood Science, 2021, 67 (1): 27.
doi: 10.1186/s10086-021-01960-0 |
|
|
Wereszczyński M, Chwiłka P, Smołka E, et al. Data from SymSPAN and OSPAN working memory capacity tasks in online and laboratory settings. Data in Brief, 2025, 62, 111923.
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111923 |
|
| Westfield P. 2024. Working memory capacity, mental fatigue, and human performance. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Aircraft Systems. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 126−133. | |
|
Wu J L, Guan Z T, Li C L, et al. Brain functional connectivity after Stroop task induced cognitive fatigue. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15, 22342.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08330-6 |
|
|
Yin J, Yuan J, Arfaei N, et al. Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: a between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, 2020, 136, 105427.
doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427 |
|
|
Zhang R H, Deng H F, Xiao X. The insular cortex: an interface between sensation, emotion and cognition. Neuroscience Bulletin, 2024, 40 (11): 1763- 1773.
doi: 10.1007/s12264-024-01211-4 |
| [1] | 王智慧,韦铄星,徐惠飞,唐秀剑,周白玫,蒙鑫,罗华龙,陆秋洁. 近自然经营对杉木人工林种内与种间竞争关系的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(9): 62-72. |
| [2] | 刘琪燕,张毓婷,丁凯,周一帆,陈晓明,张俊红,童再康. 杉木−闽楠混交林中闽楠根际土高效解磷菌的分离与功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(7): 1-11. |
| [3] | 李达海,卜文圣,杨风亭,孟盛旺,高德才,寇亮,王辉民,付晓莉. 氮磷配施促进杉木生长和材质稳定性:来自长期施肥试验的启示[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(6): 36-45. |
| [4] | 刘林,孙洪刚. 江西分宜杉木人工林生物量与死亡有机质碳库动态耦合对轮伐期和林地期望价值的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(5): 16-26. |
| [5] | 江怡航,曾庆伟,刘振华,张建国,张雄清. 基于贝叶斯网络模型的杉楠近自然改造下杉木大径材出材量的影响机制[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(4): 81-90. |
| [6] | 胡宇欣,江怡航,刘振华,朱光玉,张建国,张雄清. 杉木纯林林下补植模式对土壤质量和微生物群落的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(3): 61-73. |
| [7] | 蔡佳琪,张雪萍,毛萍,杨菁,俞森文,朱凯,张葵,汪旭,徐海军. 过热水蒸气蒸馏−干馏制备杉木烟熏香料及组成分析[J]. 林业科学, 2026, 62(3): 193-200. |
| [8] | 陈佳宇,李哲瀚,赵平欣,詹笑宇,马远帆,郭福涛. 林火烟气沉降背景下土壤理化性质对杉木挥发性有机物排放特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(6): 85-98. |
| [9] | 刘明彤,庄和必,王紫彤,石帅宾,刘晓娟,林二培,胡现铬,黄华宏. 杉木次生壁发育调控转录因子基因ClNAC40的生物学功能[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(2): 131-141. |
| [10] | 张建国,李云晓,段爱国,王兆山,张雄清,刘娟娟,何彩云. 杉木群体遗传结构的均一性显示:2 000年的栽培导致中国杉木已完全转化为人工林[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(12): 1-23. |
| [11] | 舒韦维,明安刚,杨坤,李华,闵惠琳,陶怡,李忠国,韦菊玲,刘世荣. 近自然化改造对马尾松和杉木人工林土壤有机碳化学稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(11): 1-13. |
| [12] | 宋成硕,Lim Kean-Jin,林二培,黄华宏. 杉木心边材过渡区ClBFN基因鉴定及解剖特征[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(10): 111-120. |
| [13] | 何江,覃林. 气候敏感的杉木天然林林分进界模型[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(1): 70-80. |
| [14] | 杨淑雅,王镜如,朱滢滢,伊力塔,刘美华. 杉木与浙江楠混交对根系分泌物和丛枝菌根真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(9): 59-68. |
| [15] | 都亚敏,李珠,蒋佳荔,殷方宇,吕建雄. 吸湿解吸循环过程中木材水分吸附特性[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(9): 150-158. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||