Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (7): 241-250.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250111
• Research papers • Previous Articles
Tingting Chen1(),Hao Cheng1,Jianren Ye1,*(
),Ying Li1,Anshun Ni1,2,Jiao Zhang1
Received:
2025-02-27
Online:
2025-07-20
Published:
2025-07-25
Contact:
Jianren Ye
E-mail:ttchen@njfu.edu.cn;jrye@njfu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Tingting Chen,Hao Cheng,Jianren Ye,Ying Li,Anshun Ni,Jiao Zhang. Dynamics of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus Movement with Early Diagnosis and Treatment Efficacy[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(7): 241-250.
Table 1
Classification of different stages of pine wilt disease under natural infection conditions"
感病阶段 Stages of disease | 外部症状 External symptoms | 松脂情况Condition of resin |
早期I Early stage I | 有天牛咬食伤口,针叶未变色 maturation feeding evident on twigs, no needle discolouration | ++++ |
早期II Early stage II | 有天牛咬食伤口,针叶轻微变色 maturation feeding evident on twigs, slight discolouration of needles | +++ |
中期I Middle stage I | 有天牛咬食伤口,单个小枝枯萎 maturation feeding evident on twigs, single twig wilting | + |
中期II Middle stage II | 有天牛咬食伤口,针叶枯萎小于50%,有产卵刻槽 Needle wilt less than 50%, a few oviposition scars | - |
晚期 Late stage | 有天牛咬食伤口,针叶枯萎大于50%或整株变色或有大量产卵刻槽、羽化孔、蓝变等 Needle wilt greater than 50% or whole plant discolouration or many Monochamus oviposition scars | - |
Fig.4
Diagnostic and therapeutic steps for the condition of naturally infected pine forests in the wild a. White circles indicate aspen egg-laying grooves;b. Retreating green branches;c. White circles indicate aspen feeding wounds;d. Trunk application treatment of confirmed susceptible pines;e. Pruning treatment of confirmed susceptible pines."
Table 2
The classification of different disease infection stages after artificial inoculation of Pinus massoniana"
感病阶段 Stages of disease | 外部症状 External symptoms | 松脂情况 Condition of resin |
发病前 Pre-episode | 外部无明显症状,全株针叶正常绿色 No visible external symptoms, normal green needles throughout the plant | ++++ |
早期I Early stage I | 仅接种小枝上针叶开始退绿变色 Needles on inoculated branchlets only begin to regreen and change color | +++ |
早期II Early stage II | 仅接种小枝上针叶开始变为红褐色 Needles turn reddish-brown on inoculated branchlets only | + |
中期 Middle stage | 接种枝全部枯萎变红褐色,其他附近小枝也出现针叶变色,整株针叶枯萎率低于50% All inoculated branches withered and turned reddish-brown, other nearby twigs also showed needle discoloration, and the whole plant's needle wilting rate was less than 50% | - |
晚期 Late stage | 全株针叶枯萎率大于50%至整株枯萎 Whole-plant needle wilt >50% to whole-plant wilt | - |
Table 3
Changes in population density of pine wood nematodes within inoculated branches and main trunks at different disease stages"
感病阶段 Stages of disease | 不同的取样部位松材线虫种群密度 Pine wood nematode population density at different sampling sites/(bars·g?1) | ||||||
接种枝(一级) Inoculated branch (level 1) | 主干 The main stem | ||||||
上部 Upper section | 中部 Central section | 下部 Lower part | 上部 Upper section | 中部 Central section | 下部 Lower part | ||
感病前期Pre-episode | 385.95±6.46a | 0±0b | 0±0b | 0±0a | 0±0a | 0±0a | |
早期I Early I | 854.13±11.56a | 568.93±5.12b | 15.10±2.56c | 0±0a | 0.04±0.04a | 0±0a | |
早期II Early II | 655.51±17.97c | 955.86±18.48a | 770.78±6.28b | 12.72±0.54a | 12.55±0.41a | 12.80±0.39a | |
中期 Middle stage | 239.08±9.14c | 546.86±8.97b | 980.62±3.42a | 646.77±2.96a | 74.73±2.31c | 484.52±3.75b | |
晚期 Late stage | 148.29±10.63b | 215.57±5.96a | 233.22±8.70a | 172.44±3.15a | 22.49±1.31c | 85.28±2.21b |
Fig.6
Different disease stages of artificially inoculated pine trees a. Pre-episode stage;b. Early I stage;c. Detailed view of the local discoloration phenomenon in inoculated branches;d. Early II stage;e. Middle stage;f. Late stage. White circles are points of artificially inoculated lateral branches."
Table 4
Effectiveness of disease prevention using pruning of diseased pine branches at different stages of disease stages"
处理 Deal with | 接种5天后 5 d after inoculation | 接种15天后 15 d after inoculation | 接种25天后 25 d after inoculation | 接种35天后 35 d after inoculation | 接种45天后 45 d after inoculation | 接种55天后 55 d after inoculation | |||||||||||
感病指数 Sickness index | 死亡率 Mortality rate (%) | 感病指数 Sickness index | 死亡率 Mortality rate (%) | 感病指数 Sickness index | 死亡率 Mortality rate (%) | 感病指数 Sickness index | 死亡率 Mortality rate (%) | 感病指数 Sickness index | 死亡率 Mortality rate (%) | 感病指数 Sickness index | 死亡率 Mortality rate (%) | ||||||
发病前截 Pre-episode Pruning | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
早期I截 Early I -pruning | — | — | — | — | 25 | 0 | 41.7 | 0 | 58.3 | 0 | 83.3 | 0 | |||||
早期II截 Early II -pruning | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0 | 0 | 66.7 | 0 | 91.7 | 33.3 | |||||
中期截 Middle pruning | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 75 | 0 | 100 | 66.7 | |||||
晚期截 Late pruning | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 100 | |||||
未截 No pruning | 0 | 0 | 16.7 | 0 | 41.7 | 0 | 66.7 | 0 | 91.7 | 33.3 | 100 | 100 |
Table 5
Control efficacy of ordinary naturally infected pine forests at different stages of disease progression"
感病阶段 Stages of Disease | 确诊数/株 Number of confirmed cases/plant | 处理数/株 Number of treatments/plant | 注药量/粒 Dosage/capsule | 存活数/株 Number of survivors/plant | 存活率 Survival rate(%) |
早期I Early I | 3 | 3(注药+修除病枝) 3 (Injection + pruning) | 1 | 3 | 100 |
早期II Early II | 2 | 2(注药+修除病枝) 2 (Injection + pruning) | 2 | 2 | 100 |
中期I Middle stage I | 2 | 1(注药+修除病枝) 1 (Injection + pruning) | 3 | 1 | 100 |
1(注药) 1 (Drug injection) | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
中期II Middle stage II | 5 | 4(注药+修除病枝) 4 (Injection + pruning) | 4 | 4 | 100 |
1(注药) 1 (drug injection) | 4 | 0 | 0 | ||
晚期 Late stage | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fig.7
Control efficacy of ordinary naturally infected pine forests at different stages of disease progression A: Injection of 1 capsule of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on May 9, 2024; B: Injection of 1 capsule of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on May 9, 2024; C: Injection of 1 capsule of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on June 25, 2024; D: Injection of 2 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on July 27, 2024; E: Injection of 2 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on July 31, 2024; F: Injection of 3 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on May 9, 2024; G: Injection of 3 capsules of medication, conducted on June 1, 2024; H: Injection of 4 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on May 9, 2024; I: Injection of 4 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on June 12, 2024; J: Injection of 4 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on June 1, 2024; K: Injection of 4 capsules of medication+pruning of diseased branches, conducted on June 1, 2024; L: Injection of 4 capsules of medication, conducted on May 9, 2024; a: The same tree as shown in Figure A, observed on September 26, 2024; b: The same tree as shown in Figure B, observed on September 26, 2024; c: The same tree as shown in Figure C, observed on September 26, 2024; d: The same tree as shown in Figure D, observed on September 26, 2024; e: The same tree as shown in Figure E, observed on September 26, 2024; f: The same tree as shown in Figure F, observed on September 26, 2024; g: The same tree as shown in Figure G, observed on September 26, 2024; h: The same tree as shown in Figure H, observed on September 26, 2024; i: The same tree as shown in Figure I, observed on September 26, 2024; j: The same tree as shown in Figure J, observed on September 26, 2024; k: The same tree as shown in Figure K, observed on September 26, 2024; l: The same tree as shown in Figure L, observed on September 26, 2024.A, B, and C represent pine trees at the early stage I of infection; D and E represent pine trees at the early stage II of infection; F and G represent pine trees at the mid-stage I of infection; H, I, J, K, and L represent pine trees at the mid-stage II of infection."
陈凤毛, 叶建仁, 吴小芹, 等. 松材线虫SCAR标记与检测技术. 林业科学, 2012, 48 (3): 88- 94.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120314 |
|
Chen F M, Ye J R, Wu X Q, et al. SCAR marker and detection technique of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48 (3): 88- 94.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120314 |
|
李 桥, 张绍勇, 仇辉康, 等. 6种药剂林间注干施药防控松材线虫效果分析. 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33 (4): 718- 723.
doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.04.023 |
|
Li Q, Zhang S Y, Qiu H K, et al. Effect analysis of six pesticides for the prevention and control of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus by trunk injection in forest. Journal of Zhejiang A& F University, 2016, 33 (4): 718- 723.
doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.04.023 |
|
李少华, 张 倩, 谢春春, 等. 松褐天牛羽化规律及松材线虫病可疑罹病木取样检测鉴定时间初步探索. 山东林业科技, 2021, 51 (5): 63- 67.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2021.05.012 |
|
Li S H, Zhang Q, Xie C C, et al. Preliminary study on the emergence regularity of Monochamus alternatus and the sampling, detection, and identification time of suspected trees infected with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2021, 51 (5): 63- 67.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2021.05.012 |
|
李 宇, 赵湘媛, 宋莹莹, 等. 咖啡短体线虫不同种群对番茄的寄生性和致病性. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26 (10): 81- 89.
doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2021.10.08 |
|
Li Y, Zhao X Y, Song Y Y. et al. Parasitism and pathogenicity of five populations of Pratylenchus coffeae to Solanum lycopersicum. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26 (10): 81- 89.
doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2021.10.08 |
|
刘军民, 冯志新. 1995. 松材线虫病组织病理学研究. 植物病理学报(2): 171−174. | |
Liu J M, Feng Z X. 1995. On the pathology of pine wilt disease caused by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica (China), 171−174.[in Chinese] | |
马 跃, 吕 全, 于成明, 等. 松材线虫病早期诊断技术研究评述. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45 (1): 158- 160,76,153. | |
Ma Y, Lv Q, Yu C M, et al. Study on early diagnosis technology of pine wilt disease. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 45 (1): 158- 160,76,153. | |
倪安顺, 王永春, 杨 丹, 等. 一种新型复配药剂2%阿维菌素·6%氟吡菌酰胺对松材线虫毒力药效. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (8): 18- 25. | |
Ni A S, Wang Y C, Yang D, et al. Toxicity of a new compound medicament 2% avermectin 6% fluopyram on Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (8): 18- 25. | |
谈家金, 杨荣铮, 吴慧平. 2000. 不同地理种群的松材线虫对马尾松的致病力差异. 植物检疫(6): 324-325. | |
Tan J J, Yang R Z, Wu H P. 2000. Difference of virulence of several geographical populations of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus to Pinus massoniana. Plant Quarantine(6): 324-325. [in Chinese] | |
王佳楠, 姜生伟, 张瑞芝, 等. 松材线虫潜育期延长导致红松越年枯死. 林业科学, 2024, 60 (10): 67- 75.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220895 |
|
Wang J N, Jiang S W, Zhang R Z, et al. Prolonged incubation period of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus results in the over-year death of Pinus koraiensis. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60 (10): 67- 75.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20220895 |
|
叶建仁. 松材线虫病在中国的流行现状、防治技术与对策分析. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (9): 1- 10. | |
Ye J R. Epidemic status of pine wilt disease in China and its prevention and control techniques and counter measures. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (9): 1- 10. | |
叶建仁, 吴小芹. 松材线虫病研究进展. 中国森林病虫, 2022, 41 (3): 1- 10. | |
Ye J R, Wu X Q. Research progress of pine wilt disease. Forest Pest and Disease, 2022, 41 (3): 1- 10. | |
展茂魁, 杨忠岐, 王小艺, 等. 松褐天牛成虫松材线虫病的传播能力. 林业科学, 2014, 50 (7): 74- 81. | |
Zhan M K, Yang Z Q, Wang X Y, et al. Capacity of transmitting Bursaphelenchus xylophilus by the vector Monochamus alternatus adults. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50 (7): 74- 81. | |
张 娇, 叶建仁, 陈婷婷, 等, 2024. 松材线虫高效复配制剂的药效分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 1-9. | |
Zhang J, Ye J R, Chen T T, et al. 2024. Analysis of the efficacy of efficient combined formulations against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 1-9. [in Chinese] | |
Abelleira A, Picoaga A, Mansilla J P, et al. Detection of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, causal agent of pine wilt disease on Pinus pinaster in northwestern Spain. Plant Disease, 2011, 95 (6): 776- 776. | |
Berger C, Laurent F. 2019. Trunk injection of plant protection products to protect trees from pests and diseases. Crop Protection, 124104831−104831. | |
Mamiya Y. Initial pathological changes and disease development in pine trees induced by the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, 1985, 51 (5): 546- 555.
doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.51.546 |
|
Mamiya Y, Enda N. Transmission of Bursaphelenchus Lignicolus (Nematoda: Aphelenchoididae) By Monochamus Alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Nematologica, 1972, 18 (2): 159- 162.
doi: 10.1163/187529272X00395 |
|
Mamiya Y, Kobayashi K, Hoshizaki K, et al. Population densities of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, in dead pine trees caused by pine wilt disease in cool areas of Japan. Nematological Research (Japanese Journal of Nematology), 2018, 48 (2): 63- 70.
doi: 10.3725/jjn.48.63 |
|
Ni A, Yang D, Cheng H, et al. Preliminary study on early diagnosis and rehabilitation treatment of pine wood nematode disease based on partial symptoms. Forests, 2023, 14 (4): 657.
doi: 10.3390/f14040657 |
|
Otoya-Martinez N, Leite L G, Harakava R, et al. Disease caused by Neofusicoccum parvum in pruning wounds of grapevine shoots and its control by Trichoderma spp. and Xenorhabdus szentirmaii. Fungal Biology, 2023, 127 (1/2): 865- 871.
doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2022.12.002 |
|
Ryss Y A, Kulinich A O, Sutherland R J. 2011. Pine wilt disease: a short review of worldwide research. Forestry Studies in China, 13(2): 132−138. | |
Salvador Dutra P S, Gazis R, Crane J H, et al. Pruning as an effective strategy for the integrated management of fruit and stem canker in dragon fruit production. Crop Protection, 2025, 191, 107145.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107145 |
|
Futai K. 2013. Pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 51(1): 61−83. |
[1] | Wanying Xie,Wenping Liu,Han Wang. UAV Images of Pine Forests for Early Detection of Pine Wood Nematode Infestation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(9): 124-133. |
[2] | Anshun Ni,yongchun Wang,Dan Yang,Xueshu Sun,Jianren Ye. Toxicity of a New Compound Medicament 2% Avermectin · 6% Fluopyram on Bursaphelenchus xylophilus [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(8): 18-25. |
[3] | Minjia Wang,Jianren Ye,Yusheng Tu,Fangping Du. Screening of Wood Rot Fungi for Treating the Infected Wood by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(6): 93-102. |
[4] | Ye Jianren. Epidemic Status of Pine Wilt Disease in China and Its Prevention and Control Techniques and Counter Measures [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(9): 1-10. |
[5] | Sun Tingyu, Wang Yanli, Shen Liyuan, Wu Xiaoqin, Zhu Lihua, Ye Jianren. Impact of Medium Components on Somatic Embryo Maturation in Pinus thunbergii [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(4): 178-186. |
[6] | Lin Li, Zhou Lei, Pan Jun, Kang Lipeng, Ye Jianren, Zhu Lihua. Pathogenicity of Aseptic and Germ-Carrying Bursaphelenchus xylophilus on Pinus densiflora [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(5): 82-87. |
[7] | Zhan Maokui, Yang Zhongqi, Wang Xiaoyi, Lai Yanxue, Zhang Yifeng. Capacity of Transmitting Bursaphelenchus xylophilus by the Vector Monochamus alternatus Adults [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(7): 74-81. |
[8] | Xu Fuyuan;Zheng Huaying;Liu Yunpeng;Xie Chunxia;Xu Ming;Zhao Zhendong. Resistance Analysis of Pinus massoniana Provenances to Maturation Feedings by the Adult of Monochamus alternatus and Bursaphelenchus xylophilus [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(1): 101-106. |
[9] | Xu Huachao;Xu Jinhua;Zhang Liqin;Lin Haiping;Yang Ping;Cheng Jianming. Virulence of Bacillus thuringiensis to Monochamus alternatus and Its biological Characteristics [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(4): 151-155. |
[10] | Chen Yao.;Wang Laifa;Piao Chungen;Zhu Tianhui;Shin Sangchul;Chung Yeongjin. Effects of Wood Rotting Fungi on Stumps of Dead Wood Caused by PWN(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(8): 78-81. |
[11] | Li Yan;Ye Jianren. Death Manner of Host Parenchymatous Cells in Infecting Early Stage of Pine Wilt Disease [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(4): 95-98. |
[12] | Wang Laifa;Li Zhanpeng;Qing Xubing;Wang Chuanzhen;Wang Chengfa. Application of Oleoresin Exudation Method for Controlling Pine Wood Nematode Disease by Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Changdao County of Shandong Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2004, 40(3): 175-178. |
[13] | Cao Yue;Han Zhengmin;Li Chuandao. STUDIES ON WILTING TOXIC SUBSTANCES PRODUCED IN PINES INFECTED BY PINE WOOD NEMATODES [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001, 37(4): 75-79. |
[14] | Wang Yuyan Shu Chaoran Li Haiyan Guo Zhihong. A STUDY ON THE TECHNIQUES OF THE RAPID QUARANTINE DETECTION FOR DISEASED WOOD CAUSED BY PINE WOOD NEMATODE [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2000, 36(5): 59-62. |
[15] | You Jixue;Song Zhen;He Wenlong;Wang Yuyan;Song Yushuang. STUDY ON DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN PINE WILT DISEASED WOOD AND SOUND WOOD [J]. , 1994, 30(2): 145-150. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||