Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2025, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (3): 214-232.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230342
• Research papers • Previous Articles
Honghong Yu1,2,Jiameng Yang1,*()
Received:
2023-08-03
Online:
2025-03-25
Published:
2025-03-27
Contact:
Jiameng Yang
E-mail:yjm@njfu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Honghong Yu,Jiameng Yang. Forest Horizontal Ecological Compensation Strategy and Its Stability Based on Three-Party Evolutionary Game: a Case of Chongqing City[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(3): 214-232.
Table 1
Description of parameters"
参数Parameter | 含义Description |
C1 | 森林生态保护地区保护森林付出的直接成本与放弃发展其他产业的机会成本The direct costs of forest conservation in protected forest areas and the opportunity costs of forgoing the development of other industries |
C2 | 上级政府监督地方政府行为付出的监管成本,由固定成本与可变成本2部分组成The supervision cost paid by the superior government to supervise the behaviors of local governments consists of two parts: fixed cost and variable cost |
F | 森林生态受益地区支付给森林生态保护地区的生态补偿费用The ecological compensation fees paid by forest ecological beneficial areas to forest ecological conservation areas |
R1 | 森林生态保护地区选择“保护”策略即改善生态环境给当地区域带来的经济收益(如木材、财政纵向转移支付等)The “protection” strategy of forest ecological protection area means the economic benefits (such as timber, financial vertical transfer payment, etc.) brought by improving the ecological environment to the local area |
R2 | 森林生态保护地区选择“不保护”策略时获得的经济收益The economic benefits obtained when the forest ecological protection area chooses “not protection” strategy |
E1 | 森林保护地区因保护森林资源、改善当地环境带来的生态收益The ecological benefits brought by protecting forest resources and improving local environment in forest protected areas |
E2 | 森林保护地区保护森林资源外溢的森林生态效益The spillover forest ecological benefits generated by forest conservation areas through the protection of forest resources |
E | 森林保护地区保护森林给上级政府带来的环境收益The environmental benefits that forest protection areas bring to higher levels of government through forest protection |
Cs、Cx | 横向生态补偿交易成本,森林生态保护地区与生态受益地区为签订补偿合同付出的成本The transaction costs of horizontal ecological compensation, which refer to the costs incurred by forest ecological conservation areas and ecological beneficial areas in negotiating and signing compensation agreements |
P1、P2 | 地方政府违反合同中央政府的罚款The fine imposed by the central government on local governments for violating the contract |
A1、A2 | 中央政府对地方政府履行合同的奖励The rewards from the central government to local governments for fulfilling contracts |
H | 上级政府监管后,环境改善给上级政府带来的社会收益(声誉、公信力等的提升)The social benefits (such as enhanced reputation, credibility, etc.) brought to the higher levels of government through environmental improvements following its regulatory efforts |
L | 环境恶劣给中央政府名誉带来的负面影响The negative impact on the central government’s reputation caused by environmental degradation |
公众媒体监督参与程度The public media supervision participation degree | |
H1 | 森林生态保护地区采取“保护”策略,媒体报道对森林生态保护地区产生的社会收益The social benefits generated by media coverage for forest ecological protection areas when they adopt the “protection” strategy |
H2 | 森林生态受益地区采取“补偿”策略,媒体报道对森林生态受益地区产生的社会收益The social benefits generated by media coverage for forest ecological beneficial areas when they adopt the “paying for compensation fee” strategy |
L1 | 森林生态保护地区采取“不保护”策略,媒体报道造成森林生态保护地区政府的负面影响The negative impacts generated by media coverage for forest ecological protection areas when they adopt the “not protection” strategy |
L2 | 森林生态受益地区采取“不补偿”策略,媒体报道造成森林生态受益地区政府的负面影响The negative impacts caused by media coverage for forest ecological beneficial areas when they adopt the “not paying for-compensation fee” strategy |
Table 2
Payoffs matrix of three players"
森林生态保护地区政府 Forest ecological protection area government | 森林生态受益地区政府 Forest ecological beneficial area government | 中央政府Central government | |
监管Supervise(z) | 不监管Unregulated(1?z) | ||
保护Protection(x) | 补偿Paying for compensation fee(y) | F+R1+E1+ H+E?C2?A1?A2 | F+R1+E1?C1?Cs+ E2?F?Cx+ |
不补偿Not paying for compensation fee(1?y) | R1+E1+A1?C1?Cs+ | R1+E1?C1?Cs+ | |
不保护No protection(1?x) | 补偿Paying for compensation fee(y) | R2+F?P1? | F+R2? |
不补偿Not paying for compensation fee(1?y) | R2?P1? | R2? |
Table 3
Cost-benefit table for forest conservation areas 104 yuan"
区县 Districts and counties | 木材收益 Timber income | 森林生态效益补偿收益 Forest ecological benefit compensation income | 林业产业产值 Forestry output value | 造林成本 Afforestation cost | 管护成本 Custodial cost | 机会成本 Opportunity cost |
万州区Wanzhou district | 1 855.70 | 4 438.79 | 79 834 | 7 000.00 | 3 500.00 | 76 472.87 |
黔江区Qianjiang district | 1 638.84 | 3 920.06 | 31 120 | 2 700.00 | 1 350.00 | 29 496.68 |
江津区Jiangjin district | 1 672.52 | 4 000.62 | 42 688 | 5 116.62 | 2 558.31 | 55 897.52 |
永川区Yongchuan district | 806.46 | 1 929.02 | 40 269 | 159.90 | 79.95 | 1 746.86 |
南川区Nanchuan district | 1 441.12 | 3 447.13 | 54 484 | 859.80 | 429.90 | 9 393.05 |
大足区Dazu district | 678.62 | 1 623.25 | 55 072 | 2 120.00 | 1 060.00 | 23 160.37 |
开州区Kaizhou district | 2 186.96 | 5 231.16 | 52 325 | 1 426.68 | 713.34 | 15 586.05 |
梁平区Liangping district | 897.92 | 2 147.80 | 33 274 | 743.56 | 371.78 | 8 123.12 |
武隆区Wulong district | 1 891.97 | 4 525.56 | 22 429 | 435.15 | 217.58 | 4 753.88 |
城口县Chengkou county | 2 392.59 | 5 723.01 | 18 919 | 2 269.47 | 1 134.74 | 24 793.28 |
丰都县Fengdu county | 1 498.74 | 3 584.94 | 68 805 | 2 580.00 | 1 290.00 | 28 185.72 |
垫江县Dianjiang county | 700.62 | 1 675.87 | 22 222 | 728.64 | 364.32 | 7 960.17 |
忠县Zhongxian County | 1 152.03 | 2 755.62 | 30 143 | 984.15 | 492.08 | 10 751.54 |
云阳县Yunyang county | 2 115.95 | 5 061.31 | 52 085 | 1 090.80 | 545.40 | 11 916.66 |
奉节县Fengjie county | 2 561.21 | 6 126.35 | 19 367 | 6 160.00 | 3 080.00 | 67 296.12 |
巫山县Wushan county | 1 840.11 | 4 401.50 | 69 571 | 3 540.00 | 1 770.00 | 38 673.43 |
巫溪县Wuxi county | 2 818.33 | 6 741.38 | 44 816 | 5 280.00 | 2 640.00 | 57 682.40 |
石柱县Shizhu county | 1 816.92 | 4 346.03 | 18 633 | 10 180.00 | 5 090.00 | 111 213.40 |
秀山县Xiushan county | 1 358.64 | 3 249.84 | 28 333 | 1 994.22 | 997.11 | 21 786.25 |
酉阳县Youyang county | 3 274.59 | 7 832.75 | 63 822 | 8 360.00 | 4 180.00 | 91 330.48 |
彭水县Pengshui county | 2 353.57 | 5 629.69 | 38 237 | 1 405.08 | 702.54 | 15 350.07 |
合计Total | 36 953.41 | 88 391.68 | 886 448 | 65 134.07 | 32 567.05 | 711 569.92 |
曹秉帅, 邹长新, 高吉喜, 等. 生态安全评价方法及其应用. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35 (8): 953- 963. | |
Cao B S, Zou C X, Gao J X, et al. Review on methodology and application of ecological security assessment. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019, 35 (8): 953- 963. | |
曹洪华, 景 鹏, 王荣成. 生态补偿过程动态演化机制及其稳定策略研究. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28 (9): 1547- 1555.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.09.010 |
|
Cao H H, Jing P, Wang R C. The dynamic evolution mechanism of ecological compensation and its stable strategy research. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013, 28 (9): 1547- 1555.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.09.010 |
|
程常高, 周海炜, 唐 彦, 等. 横向生态补偿对流域环境治理的重要性: 基于央地协同视角的考察. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31 (9): 278- 286. | |
Cheng C G, Zhou H W, Tang Y, et al. The importance of horizontal ecological compensation for river basin environmental governance: a study based on the perspective of central local collaboration. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31 (9): 278- 286. | |
丛喜东, 李 琳, 齐永峰, 等. 牡丹江森林生态系统服务功能重要性评价. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (6): 75- 80, 133. | |
Cong X D, Li L, Qi Y F, et al. Evaluation on the importance of forest ecosystem services in Mudanjiang. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39 (6): 75- 80, 133. | |
伏润民, 缪小林. 中国生态功能区财政转移支付制度体系重构: 基于拓展的能值模型衡量的生态外溢价值. 经济研究, 2015, 50 (3): 47- 61. | |
Fu R M, Miao X L. A new financial transfer payment system in ecological function areas in China: based on the spillover ecological value measured by the expansion emergy analysis. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50 (3): 47- 61. | |
耿翔燕, 葛颜祥, 张化楠. 2018. 基于重置成本的流域生态补偿标准研究: 以小清河流域为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 28(1): 140−147. | |
Geng X Y, Ge Y X, Zhang H N. 2018. Study on ecological compensation standard of watershed based on reset cost: a case study of Xiaoqing River Basin. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(1): 140−147. [in Chinese] | |
黄凯南. 主观博弈论与制度内生演化. 经济研究, 2010, 45 (4): 134- 146. | |
Huang K N. Subjective games and endogenous evolution of institutions. Economic Research Journal, 2010, 45 (4): 134- 146. | |
孔凡斌, 程文杰, 徐彩瑶. 2023. 数字经济发展能否提高森林生态产品价值转化效率: 基于浙江省丽水市的实证分析. 中国农村经济, (5): 163−184. | |
Kong F B, Cheng W J, Xu C Y. 2023. Does the development of digital economy improve the value transformation efficiency of forest ecological products: an empirical analysis in Lishui, Zhejiang Province. Chinese Rural Economy, (5): 163−184. [in Chinese] | |
刘广明. 京津冀: 区际生态补偿促进区域间协调. 环境经济, 2007, (12): 35- 39.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-724X.2007.12.009 |
|
Liu G M. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei: interregional ecological compensation promotes interregional coordination. Environmental Economy, 2007, (12): 35- 39.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-724X.2007.12.009 |
|
刘 琳, 吴云飞, 韩 哲, 等. 林业生态建设关注度对环境库兹涅茨曲线的影响. 森林工程, 2023, 39 (6): 64- 74. | |
Liu L, Wu Y F, Han Z, et al. The impact of forestry ecological construction attention on the environmental Kuznets curve. Forest Engineering, 2023, 39 (6): 64- 74. | |
聂承静, 程梦林. 基于边际效应理论的地区横向森林生态补偿研究: 以北京和河北张承地区为例. 林业经济, 2019, 41 (1): 24- 31, 40. | |
Nie C J, Cheng M L. Research on regional lateral forest ecological compensation based on the theory of marginal effect: taking Beijing and Zhang Cheng district of Hebei Province as examples. Forestry Economics, 2019, 41 (1): 24- 31, 40. | |
潘鹤思, 柳洪志. 跨区域森林生态补偿的演化博弈分析: 基于主体功能区的视角. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (12): 4560- 4569. | |
Pan H S, Liu H Z. The evolutionary game analysis of cross-regional forest ecological compensation: based on the perspective of the main functional area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39 (12): 4560- 4569. | |
孙博文. 建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的瓶颈制约与策略选择. 改革, 2022, (5): 34- 51. | |
Sun B W. The bottleneck restriction and strategies of establishing and improving the value realization mechanism of ecological products. Reform, 2022, (5): 34- 51. | |
王宏利, 董玟希, 周 鹏. 跨省流域生态补偿长效机制研究: 基于演化博弈的视角. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 19 (4): 76- 85. | |
Wang H L, Dong W X, Zhou P. Research on long-term mechanism of ecological compensation in inter-provincial watershed: based on the perspective of evolutionary game. Journal of Beijing Union University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2021, 19 (4): 76- 85. | |
王奕淇, 李国平. 2016. 基于能值拓展的流域生态外溢价值补偿研究: 以渭河流域上游为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 26(11): 69−75. | |
Wang Y Q, Li G P. 2016. Study of watershed spillover ecological value compensation based on expansion emergy: a case of Weihe Watershed Upstream. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(11): 69−75. [in Chinese] | |
王 莹, 彭秀丽. 基于演化博弈的矿产资源生态补偿机制研究. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42 (S1): 261- 266. | |
Wang Y, Peng X L. Research on ecological compensation mechanism of mineral resources based on evolutionary game. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 42 (S1): 261- 266. | |
韦贵红. 我国森林生态补偿立法存在的问题与对策. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 10 (4): 14- 20. | |
Wei G H. Legislation problems of forestry ecological compensation and countermeasures. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 2011, 10 (4): 14- 20. | |
吴立军, 李文秀. 基于公平视角下的中国地区碳生态补偿研究. 中国软科学, 2019, (4): 184- 192.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2019.04.019 |
|
Wu L J, Li W X. Research on regional carbon ecological compensation in China from the perspective of equity. China Soft Science, 2019, (4): 184- 192.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2019.04.019 |
|
邢玉升, 陈东旭. 基于演化博弈的生态林业补偿机制研究. 哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, (5): 77- 87, 97. | |
Xing Y S, Chen D X. Research on compensation mechanism of ecological forestry based on evolutionary game theory. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Science Edition), 2018, (5): 77- 87, 97. | |
杨光明, 时岩钧. 基于演化博弈的长江三峡流域生态补偿机制研究. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31 (10): 2058- 2068. | |
Yang G M, Shi Y J. Study on ecological compensation of Three Gorges basin based on evolutionary game theory. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31 (10): 2058- 2068. | |
赵金龙, 王泺鑫, 韩海荣, 等. 森林生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展与趋势. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32 (8): 2229- 2237. | |
Zhao J L, Wang L X, Han H R, et al. Research advances and trends in forest ecosystem services value evaluation. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32 (8): 2229- 2237. | |
Bu Y, Wang E D, Yu Y. Analysis on asymptotic stabilization of eco-compensation program for forest ecotourism stakeholders. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 (23): 29304- 29320.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12703-5 |
|
Chen Q W, Li J, Li R N, et al. River basin water resource compensation characteristics by set pair analysis: the Dongjiang example. Frontiers of Earth Science, 2014, 8 (1): 64- 69.
doi: 10.1007/s11707-013-0389-4 |
|
Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141 (2): 350- 352.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.020 |
|
Ding Z M, Yao S B. Theory and valuation of cross-regional ecological compensation for cultivated land: a case study of Shanxi Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 136, 108609.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108609 |
|
Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65 (4): 663- 674.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 |
|
Ezzine-de-Blas D, Dutilly C, Lara-Pulido J A, et al. Payments for environmental services in a policymix: spatial and temporal articulation in Mexico. PLoS One, 2016, 11 (4): e0152514.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152514 |
|
Farley J, Costanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69 (11): 2060- 2068.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010 |
|
Gao X, Shen J Q, He W J, et al. An evolutionary game analysis of governments’ decision-making behaviors and factors influencing watershed ecological compensation in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 251, 109592.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109592 |
|
Jack B K, Kousky C, Sims K R E. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105 (28): 9465- 9470. | |
Moreno-Sanchez R, Maldonado J H, Wunder S, et al. Heterogeneous users and willingness to pay in an ongoing payment for watershed protection initiative in the Colombian Andes. Ecological Economics, 2012, 75, 126- 134.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.009 |
|
Pagiola S, Ramírez E, Gobbi J, et al. Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64 (2): 374- 385.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.014 |
|
Shen J Q, Gao X, He W J, et al. Prospect theory in an evolutionary game: construction of watershed ecological compensation system in Taihu Lake basin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 291, 125929.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125929 |
|
Sheng J C, Wu Y, Zhang M Y, et al. An evolutionary modeling approach for designing a contractual REDD+ payment scheme. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 79, 276- 285.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.010 |
|
Wang Q X, Wang N, Wang H D, et al. Study on influencing factors and simulation of watershed ecological compensation based on evolutionary game. Sustainability, 2022a, 14 (6): 3374.
doi: 10.3390/su14063374 |
|
Wang W, Wu F P, Yu H. Optimal design of the ecological compensation mechanism in transboundary river basins under the belt and road initiative. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022b, 32, 173- 183.
doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.018 |
|
Wu L, Jin L S. How eco-compensation contribute to poverty reduction: a perspective from different income group of rural households in Guizhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 275, 122962.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122962 |
|
Wunder S, Brouwer R, Engel S, et al. From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nature Sustainability, 2018, 1, 145- 150.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0036-x |
|
Yost A, An L, Bilsborrow R, et al. Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve. Ecological Economics, 2020, 169, 106509.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106509 |
[1] | Xiaoning Ge,Xinqiao Xu,Huaiqing Zhang,Jing Zhang,Jie Yang,Zeyu Cui,Rurao Fu,Jinjie Liang,Tianhua Zou,Linlong Wang,Yang Liu. Progress and Reflection on Genotype-Environment Interaction Algorithms in Forest Tree Breeding [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(3): 1-15. |
[2] | Gentana Ge,Lianggaoke Yue,Xiaosong Li,Cuicui Ji,Jianhe Wang,Tong Shen,Tiancan Wang. Estimation of Tree Height in the Grain for Green Program Stands of Inner Mongolia Based on GEDI and Sentinel-2 [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(3): 16-26. |
[3] | Liqing Si,Wei Li,Mingyu Wang,Lifu Shu,Shangbo Yuan,Weike Li,Hui Zhang,Yifan Shi,Nuanyang Zhou. Characteristics of Temporal and Spatial Variations of Lightning in China’s Key Forest Areas [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(3): 50-62. |
[4] | Zihan Cheng,Jinchi Zhang,Jiang Jiang,Miaojing Meng,Jiayin Li,Mei Luo,Xianghua Fang. Spatial Distribution Pattern and Correlation of Dominant Species at Different Vertical Levels in Baishanzu Mid-Mountain Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(3): 72-85. |
[5] | Shuifa Ke,Shenwei Wan,Fanbin Kong,Hongge Zhu. Formation Logic, Spatial &Temporal Evolution and Obstacle Factors Analysis of China’s Forestry New Quality Productive Forces [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(3): 199-213. |
[6] | Ruting Chen,Defu Chi. Effects of Pest and Disease Disturbance on Forest Carbon Sink — a Review [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 1-11. |
[7] | Yanling Tang,Qiaoling Han,Yue Zhao,Weiping Liu,Yili Zheng,Yandong Zhao,Shanshan Xu. A Forest Pest Detection Algorithm Based on Multi-scale Sequence Feature Fusion [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 21-30. |
[8] | Biyun Wu,Xiangdong Lei,Xiao He,Yutang Li. Stand Dominant Height Estimation Methods and Site Quality Assessment for Natural Mixed Conifer-Broadleaved Forests in Changbai Mountains [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 85-92. |
[9] | Liyang Yao,Yue Zhu,Yaning Wang,Shuai Pang. Impact of Tire Size on the Driving Performance of Small Wheeled Mobile Platforms in Forest [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 180-189. |
[10] | Cong Zhang,Qi Liu,Haikui Li,Pengju Liu,Siying Zhan. Scale-Compatible and Tree Species-Classified Forest Carbon Storage Model of Volume-Derived in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(1): 57-69. |
[11] | Luxia Liu,Bo Hu,Guoqing Sang,Yuyu Liu. Assessing Forest Vegetation Diversity Using Forest Structure Indicators Based on LiDAR Remote Sensing: A Review [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(1): 176-196. |
[12] | Zhidan Zhang,Zhiguo Cao,Guangxuan Yan,Di Yao,Qingqing Huang,Jie Duan,Yafei Wang,Kai Wang,Ni Zheng. Characterization of Retention of Atmospheric Particles by Five Typical Scenic Recreational Forests in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(9): 1-11. |
[13] | Jiazhu Shi,Han Xu,Yanpeng Li,Jie Chen,Tushou Luo,Mingxian Lin,Yide Li. Species Composition and Quantitative Characteristics of Seedlings in a 60 hm2 Plot in the Tropical Mountain Rainforest in Jianfengling, Hainan Island [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(9): 33-40. |
[14] | Shuya Yang,Jingru Wang,Yingying Zhu,Lita Yi,Meihua Liu. Effects of Mixed Plantation of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe chekiangensis on Root Exudates and Community Structure of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(9): 59-68. |
[15] | Jingwei Tan,Huaiqing Zhang,Yang Liu,Jie Yang,Dongping Zheng. Question-answering Forestry Pre-trained Language Model: ForestBERT [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(9): 99-110. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||