Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 28-35.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20200889
Previous Articles Next Articles
Pei He,Junjie Wang,Shidong Xin,Zipeng Zhang,Lichun Jiang*
Received:
2020-11-09
Online:
2023-06-25
Published:
2023-08-08
Contact:
Lichun Jiang
CLC Number:
Pei He,Junjie Wang,Shidong Xin,Zipeng Zhang,Lichun Jiang. Comparison of Four Methods on Modelling Stem Taper Function for Natural Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica and Larix gmelinii[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(6): 28-35.
Table 1
Descriptive statistics for sample trees"
树种 Species | 样木数 Number | 变量 Variable | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 平均值 Mean | 标准差 SD |
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | 187 | 胸径 DBH/cm | 15.4 | 55.9 | 39.1 | 9.78 |
187 | 树高 Tree height/m | 11.4 | 25.4 | 20.3 | 2.62 | |
兴安落叶松 Larix gmelinii | 283 | 胸径 DBH/cm | 5.1 | 58.9 | 35.7 | 12.70 |
283 | 树高 Tree height/m | 7.3 | 31 | 22.3 | 4.83 |
Table 2
Parameter estimates of different modelling methods"
方法 Methods | 樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | 兴安落叶松 Larix gmelinii | |||||||
ONLS | QR | FIXED | GAM | ONLS | QR | FIXED | GAM | ||
β | 0.793 5 (0.000 9) | 0.801 1 (0.000 9) | |||||||
b1 | 0.981 2 (0.035 3) | 0.967 3 (0.016 3) | 1.015 9 (0.018 6) | 0.775 8 (0.026 1) | 0.934 2 (0.018 5) | 0.952 3 (0.027 9) | |||
b2 | 0.976 5 (0.007 2) | 0.987 3 (0.003 6) | 0.987 8 (0.003 9) | 0.917 4 (0.007 8) | 0.977 3 (0.006 6) | 0.978 6 (0.008 3) | |||
b3 | 0.034 7 (0.015 1) | 0.025 1 (0.007 9) | 0.009 8 (0.007 9) | 0.173 5 (0.016 0) | 0.044 9 (0.012 7) | 0.040 9 (0.016 4) | |||
b4 | 0.556 2 (0.017 3) | 0.596 9 (0.022 8) | 0.603 3 (0.015 4) | 0.541 5 (0.016 2) | 0.600 6 (0.019 2) | 0.659 2 (0.008 8) | |||
b5 | 0.252 8 (0.084 4) | 0.164 1 (0.146 3) | 0.406 5 (0.160 2) | ?0.119 8 (0.060 9) | ?0.418 2 (0.068 1) | ?0.504 2 (0.087 5) | |||
b6 | 0.440 4 (0.011 1) | 0.407 1 (0.019 0) | 0.421 5 (0.020 6) | 0.376 7 (0.011 0) | 0.388 5 (0.016 1) | 0.348 0 (0.015 9) | |||
b7 | ?4.547 4 (0.677 6) | ?3.320 6 (0.945 6) | ?5.424 7 (1.209 5) | ?1.940 9 (0.349 1) | ?0.255 1 (0.298 3) | 0.381 0 (0.373 5) | |||
b8 | ?0.007 9 (0.001 6) | ?0.010 2 (0.002 1) | ?0.014 0 (0.001 8) | ?0.003 6 (0.001 3) | 0.000 4 (0.002 3) | ?0.013 7 (0.001 5) | |||
b9 | 0.117 9 (0.023 7) | 0.151 4 (0.030 9) | 0.197 9 (0.024 5) | 0.339 1 (0.022 9) | 0.277 8 (0.034 9) | 0.491 7 (0.026 6) |
Table 3
Goodness-of-fit statistics of different modelling methods"
树种 Species | 方法 Methods | ME | RMSE | RMSE% | R2 |
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | ONLS | 0.001 8 | 2.017 2 | 6.743 3 | 0.977 3 |
QR | 0.166 1 | 2.030 5 | 6.787 6 | 0.977 0 | |
FIXED | 0.070 0 | 2.029 2 | 6.783 3 | 0.977 1 | |
GAM | ?0.000 008 | 1.941 8 | 6.491 3 | 0.978 9 | |
兴安落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ONLS | ?0.022 6 | 2.400 2 | 9.081 4 | 0.972 7 |
QR | 0.090 2 | 2.439 2 | 9.229 1 | 0.971 8 | |
FIXED | ?0.025 4 | 2.485 9 | 9.405 7 | 0.970 7 | |
GAM | 0.000 2 | 2.268 1 | 8.581 7 | 0.975 6 |
Table 4
Different modelling methods evaluated by predicting diameters in validation"
树种 Species | 方法 Methods | ME | RMSE | RMSE% | R2 |
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | ONLS | 0.000 9 | 2.039 4 | 6.817 3 | 0.976 8 |
QR | 0.170 5 | 2.068 0 | 6.913 2 | 0.976 2 | |
FIXED | 0.068 9 | 2.046 7 | 6.841 9 | 0.976 7 | |
GAM | 0.000 6 | 2.014 0 | 6.732 5 | 0.977 3 | |
兴安落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ONLS | ?0.024 3 | 2.417 3 | 9.146 1 | 0.972 3 |
QR | 0.087 0 | 2.449 0 | 9.266 2 | 0.971 6 | |
FIXED | ?0.025 4 | 2.485 9 | 9.405 7 | 0.970 7 | |
GAM | 0.003 3 | 2.305 5 | 8.723 1 | 0.974 8 |
Table 5
Different modelling methods evaluated by predicting total volume in validation"
树种 Species | 方法 Methods | ME | RMSE | RMSE% | R2 |
樟子松 Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica | ONLS | 0.009 9 | 0.085 3 | 6.217 3 | 0.978 4 |
QR | 0.019 7 | 0.087 0 | 6.342 2 | 0.977 6 | |
FIXED | 0.014 4 | 0.085 6 | 6.240 7 | 0.978 3 | |
GAM | 0.007 3 | 0.080 5 | 5.868 4 | 0.980 8 | |
兴安落叶松 Larix gmelinii | ONLS | 0.009 2 | 0.093 9 | 7.6889 | 0.977 3 |
QR | 0.011 1 | 0.098 7 | 8.079 5 | 0.974 9 | |
FIXED | 0.003 7 | 0.091 7 | 7.507 3 | 0.978 3 | |
GAM | 0.000 2 | 0.083 3 | 6.816 1 | 0.982 1 |
马岩岩, 姜立春. 基于非线性分位数回归的落叶松树干削度方程. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (10): 68- 75. | |
Ma Y Y, Jiang L C. Stem taper function for Larix gmelinii based on nonlinear quantile regression . Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (10): 68- 75. | |
辛士冬, 姜立春. 利用分位数回归模拟人工樟子松树干干形. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42 (2): 1- 8.
doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190014 |
|
Xin S D, Jiang L C. Modeling stem taper profile for Pinus sylvestris plantations using nonlinear quantile regression . Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42 (2): 1- 8.
doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190014 |
|
胥 辉, 孟宪宇. 天山云杉削度方程与材种出材率表的研究. 北京林业大学学报, 1996, 18 (3): 21- 30.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.1996.03.004 |
|
Xu H, Meng X Y. Study on taper functions and merchantable volume yielding rate tables of Picea schrenkiana var . tianshanica. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1996, 18 (3): 21- 30.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.1996.03.004 |
|
曾伟生, 廖志云. 削度方程的研究. 林业科学, 1997, 33 (2): 127- 132. | |
Zeng W S, Liao Z Y. A study on taper equation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1997, 33 (2): 127- 132. | |
Adamec Z, Drápela K. Generalized additive models as an alternative approach to the modelling of the tree height-diameter relationship. Journal of Forest Science, 2015, 61 (6): 235- 243.
doi: 10.17221/14/2015-JFS |
|
Arias-Rodil M, Diéguez-Aranda U, Rodríguez Puerta F, et al. Modelling and localizing a stem taper function for Pinus radiata in Spain . Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 45 (6): 647- 658.
doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0276 |
|
Bailey R L. Upper stem volumes from stem analysis data: an overlapping bolts method. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1995, 25 (1): 170- 173.
doi: 10.1139/x95-020 |
|
Bi H Q. Trigonometric variable-form taper equations for Australian eucalypts. Forest Science, 2000, 46 (3): 397- 409. | |
Cao Q V, Wang J. Calibrating fixed- and mixed-effects taper equations. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262 (4): 671- 673.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.039 |
|
Cao Q V, Wang J. Evaluation of methods for calibrating a tree taper equation. Forest Science, 2015, 61 (2): 213- 219.
doi: 10.5849/forsci.14-008 |
|
Fonweban J, Gardiner B, MacDonald E, et al. Taper functions for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong. ) Carr. ) in northern Britain . Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 84 (1): 49- 60. | |
Gómez-García E, Crecente-Campo F, Diéguez-Aranda U. Selection of mixed-effects parameters in a variable-exponent taper equation for birch trees in northwestern Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 2013, 70 (7): 707- 715.
doi: 10.1007/s13595-013-0313-9 |
|
Jacobs M, Rais A, Pretzsch H. Analysis of stand density effects on the stem form of Norway spruce trees and volume miscalculation by traditional form factor equations using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2020, 50 (1): 51- 64.
doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0121 |
|
Jiang L C, Brooks J R, Wang J. Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in west Virginia. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 213 (1/2/3): 399- 409. | |
Koenker R, Bassett G. Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 1978, 46 (1): 33.
doi: 10.2307/1913643 |
|
Kozak A. My last words on taper equations. The Forestry Chronicle, 2004, 80 (4): 507- 515.
doi: 10.5558/tfc80507-4 |
|
Nigh G, Smith W. Effect of climate on lodgepole pine stem taper in British Columbia, Canada. Forestry:An International Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 85 (5): 579- 587.
doi: 10.1093/forestry/cps063 |
|
Özçelik R, Brooks J R, Jiang L C. Modeling stem profile of Lebanon cedar, Brutian pine, and Cilicica fir in southern Turkey using nonlinear mixed-effects models. European Journal of Forest Research, 2011, 130 (4): 613- 621.
doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0453-5 |
|
Özçelik R, Crecente-Campo F. Stem taper equations for estimating merchantable volume of Lebanon cedar trees in the Taurus Mountains, southern Turkey. Forest Science, 2016, 62 (1): 78- 91.
doi: 10.5849/forsci.14-212 |
|
Pukkala T, Hanssen K, Andreassen K. 2019. Stem taper and bark functions for Norway spruce in Norway. Silva Fennica, 53(3). | |
Rodríguez F, Lizarralde I, Bravo F. Comparison of stem taper equations for eight major tree species in the Spanish Plateau. Forest Systems, 2015, 24 (3): e034.
doi: 10.5424/fs/2015243-06229 |
|
Rojo A, Perales X, Sánchez-Rodríguez F, et al. Stem taper functions for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Galicia (northwestern Spain) . European Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 124 (3): 177- 186. | |
Shahzad M K, Hussain A, Burkhart H E, et al. Stem taper functions for Betula platyphylla in the Daxing’an Mountains, northeast China . Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32 (2): 529- 541.
doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01152-4 |
|
Shahzad M K, Hussain A, Jiang L C. A model form for stem taper and volume estimates of Asian white birch (Betula platyphylla): a major commercial tree species of northeast China . Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2020, 50 (3): 274- 286. | |
Sharma M, Parton J. Modeling stand density effects on taper for jack pine and black spruce plantations using dimensional analysis. Forest Science, 2009, 55 (3): 268- 282. | |
Trincado G, Burkhart H E. A generalized approach for modeling and localizing stem profile curves. Forest Science, 2006, 52 (6): 670- 682. | |
Wood S N. 2017. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. | |
Yang Y Q, Huang S. On the statistical and biological behaviors of nonlinear mixed forest models. European Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 132 (5/6): 727- 736. | |
Yang Y Q, Huang S, Trincado G, et al. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of variable-exponent taper equations for lodgepole pine in Alberta, Canada. European Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 128 (4): 415- 429.
doi: 10.1007/s10342-009-0286-2 |
|
Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, et al. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs, 2005, 4, 1- 63. |
[1] | Wenmei Liao,Jing Lin,Yueqin Shen,Fanbin Kong. Influence of Socialized Forestry Services on the Income Gap of Rural Households [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(1): 59-73. |
[2] | Xiaofang Zhang,Xuzhan Guo,Liang Hong,Tao Chen,Liyong Fu,Huiru Zhang. Comparison of Single Tree Crown Prediction Models of Larix principis-rupprechtii and Betula platyphylla in the Core Area of the Winter Olympics in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(10): 89-100. |
[3] | Tingting Zhao,Dongzhi Wang,Dongyan Zhang,Li Guo,Xuanrui Huang. Crown Prediction Model of Larix principis-rupprechtii Plantation in Saihanba of Hebei Province, Northern China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(5): 108-118. |
[4] | Yanli Xu,Pei He,Shidong Xin,Lichun Jiang. Study on Additive Equation Systems of Stem Taper and Bark Thickness of Dahurian Larch [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(12): 60-66. |
[5] | Yanyan Ma,Lichun Jiang. Stem Taper Function for Larix gmelinii Based on Nonlinear Quantile Regression [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(10): 68-75. |
[6] | Pang Lifeng, Jia Hongyan, Lu Yuanchang, Niu Changhai, Fu Liyong. Comparison of Two Parameters Estimation Methods for Segmented Taper Equations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(12): 141-148. |
[7] | Dai Yongwu, Yu Jianhui. Empirical Analysis on Determinants and International Competitiveness of China's Wood-Based Panel Industry in Post-Crisis Era [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 113-122. |
[8] | Jiang Lichun;Liu Ruilong. A Stem Taper Model with Nonlinear Mixed Effects for Dahurian Larch [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(4): 101-106. |
[9] | Weisheng Zeng,Zhiyun Liao. A STUDY ON TAPER EQUATION [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1997, 33(2): 127-132. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||