Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 110-118.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220412
• Research papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Minxia Ren1,Tan Li2,Ziheng Zhang1,Yuexia Zeng3,Lifeng Wang1,Minsheng Yang1,4,Junxia Liu1,4,*
Received:
2020-12-17
Online:
2022-04-25
Published:
2022-07-20
Contact:
Junxia Liu
CLC Number:
Minxia Ren,Tan Li,Ziheng Zhang,Yuexia Zeng,Lifeng Wang,Minsheng Yang,Junxia Liu. Effects of Transgenic BtCry1Ac and API gene in Poplar 107 on Diversity and Stability of Arthropod Community[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 110-118.
Table 1
The basic composition of arthropod community"
所属目 | 2 a | 3 a | 4 a | 5 a | 6 a | 总比Total | ||||||||||||||
Orders | NS | NI | R(%) | NS | NI | R(%) | NS | NI | R(%) | NS | NI | R(%) | NS | NI | R(%) | R(%) | ||||
鳞翅目 Lepidoptera | 11 | 3 318 | 48.7 | 13 | 5 246 | 48.8 | 13 | 7 584 | 67.3 | 17 | 6 578 | 55.8 | 18 | 3 639 | 25.4 | 48 | ||||
半翅目 Hemiptera | 9 | 459 | 6.7 | 10 | 1 516 | 14.1 | 11 | 1 216 | 10.8 | 16 | 849 | 7.2 | 21 | 4 188 | 29.3 | 15.0 | ||||
膜翅目 Hymenoptera | 6 | 1 080 | 15.8 | 5 | 1 256 | 11.7 | 6 | 901 | 8.0 | 9 | 2 005 | 17.0 | 9 | 2 577 | 18.0 | 14.2 | ||||
蜘蛛目 Araneida | 7 | 173 | 2.5 | 8 | 515 | 4.8 | 11 | 269 | 2.4 | 17 | 1 274 | 10.8 | 20 | 2 455 | 17.2 | 8.5 | ||||
鞘翅目 Coleoptera | 11 | 964 | 14.1 | 14 | 1 562 | 14.5 | 12 | 973 | 8.6 | 18 | 365 | 3.1 | 17 | 730 | 5.1 | 8.4 | ||||
双翅目 Diptera | 11 | 742 | 10.9 | 8 | 345 | 3.2 | 10 | 193 | 1.7 | 7 | 579 | 4.9 | 11 | 403 | 2.8 | 4.1 | ||||
脉翅目 Neuroptera | 1 | 68 | 1.0 | 1 | 89 | 0.8 | 1 | 31 | 0.3 | 1 | 60 | 0.5 | 1 | 196 | 1.4 | 0.8 | ||||
直翅目 Orthoptera | 2 | 14 | 0.2 | 3 | 198 | 1.8 | 4 | 43 | 0.4 | 3 | 59 | 0.5 | 5 | 78 | 0.5 | 0.7 | ||||
其他 Other | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 14 | 0.1 | 1 | 51 | 0.5 | 5 | 13 | 0.1 | 3 | 33 | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||||
合计 Total | 6 818 | 10 741 | 11 261 | 11 782 | 14 299 |
Table 2
Two-factor analysis of variance for sub-community composition in transgenic 107 poplar"
亚群落 Sub-community | 指标 Index | 株系Strains | 林龄Stand age | 株系×林龄Strains×Stand age | |||||
F | P | F | P | F | P | ||||
害虫亚群落 | NS | 3.547 | 0.016 | 112.502 | < 0.001 | 1.225 | 0.270 | ||
Pest sub-community | NI | 38.215 | < 0.001 | 4.250 | 0.004 | 0.927 | 0.543 | ||
天敌亚群落 | NS | 0.687 | 0.063 | 99.021 | < 0.001 | 0.936 | 0.533 | ||
Natural enemy sub-community | NI | 0.875 | 0.483 | 44.786 | < 0.001 | 0.364 | 0.987 | ||
中性节肢动物亚群落 | NS | 0.440 | 0.779 | 10.701 | < 0.001 | 1.154 | 0.325 | ||
Neutral arthropod sub-community | NI | 0.930 | 0.451 | 19.480 | < 0.001 | 0.408 | 0.976 |
Table 3
Community characteristic index of transgenic 107 poplar arthropods"
株系Strains | 指数Index | 2 a | 3 a | 4 a | 5 a | 6 a | 均值Mean |
CK | H′ | 2.10±0.32b | 1.51±0.32b | 1.55±0.22b | 1.98±0.07b | 2.49±0.16b | 1.93±0.18b |
#1 | 2.47±0.05ab | 2.45±0.16a | 2.20±0.17a | 3.08±0.08a | 3.06±0.08a | 2.65±0.18a | |
#2 | 2.80±0.06a | 2.79±0.08a | 2.18±0.13a | 3.06±0.10a | 3.04±0.14a | 2.77±0.16a | |
#3 | 2.52±0.13ab | 2.49±0.08a | 2.47±0.20a | 2.90±0.03a | 2.89±0.14a | 2.65±0.10a | |
#9 | 2.53±0.32ab | 2.62±0.17a | 2.02±0.17a | 3.13±0.07a | 3.16±0.06a | 2.69±0.21a | |
CK | J | 0.60±0.10a | 0.41±0.08b | 0.45±0.07b | 0.51±0.02b | 0.60±0.04c | 0.51±0.04b |
#1 | 0.72±0.01a | 0.69±0.04a | 0.66±0.03a | 0.80±0.01a | 0.77±0.02ab | 0.73±0.03a | |
#2 | 0.80±0.02a | 0.77±0.02a | 0.64±0.04a | 0.78±0.02a | 0.76±0.03ab | 0.75±0.03a | |
#3 | 0.73±0.04a | 0.69±0.02a | 0.70±0.06a | 0.76±0.01a | 0.71±0.03b | 0.72±0.01a | |
#9 | 0.74±0.09a | 0.74±0.05a | 0.58±0.04a | 0.81±0.01a | 0.79±0.01a | 0.73±0.04a | |
CK | C | 0.44±0.12a | 0.68±0.09a | 0.64±0.07a | 0.56±0.03a | 0.41±0.07a | 0.55±0.05a |
#1 | 0.32±0.03a | 0.29±0.04b | 0.34±0.06b | 0.18±0.01b | 0.16±0.02b | 0.26±0.04b | |
#2 | 0.21±0.03a | 0.24±0.03b | 0.42±0.08b | 0.19±0.04b | 0.20±0.05b | 0.25±0.04b | |
#3 | 0.31±0.05a | 0.34±0.02b | 0.32±0.07b | 0.18±0.02b | 0.27±0.06b | 0.28±0.03b | |
#9 | 0.30±0.12a | 0.26±0.04b | 0.50±0.04b | 0.14±0.01b | 0.14±0.02b | 0.27±0.07b |
Table 4
Two-factor analysis of variance of index in transgenic 107 poplar arthropod community characteristics"
指数 | 株系Strains | 林龄Stand age | 株系×林龄Strains×stand age | |||||
Index | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
H′ | 22.493 | < 0.001 | 22.117 | < 0.001 | 1.209 | < 0.001 | ||
J | 24.308 | < 0.001 | 7.658 | < 0.001 | 1.106 | 0.365 | ||
C | 25.088 | < 0.001 | 11.613 | < 0.001 | 1.511 | 0.118 |
Table 5
Stability analysis of transgenic 107 poplars"
株系Strains | 指标Index | 2 a | 3 a | 4 a | 5 a | 6 a |
CK | Ss/Si | 0.07±0.02b | 0.04±0.01b | 0.04±0.01b | 0.04±0.00c | 0.05±0.01c |
#1 | 0.11±0.01ab | 0.09±0.01a | 0.07±0.01a | 0.11±0.01ab | 0.10±0.01ab | |
#2 | 0.15±0.01a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.08±0.01a | 0.12±0.01a | 0.09±0.01ab | |
#3 | 0.09±0.00ab | 0.08±0.01a | 0.09±0.01a | 0.08±0.00b | 0.09±0.01b | |
#9 | 0.13±0.03a | 0.11±0.01a | 0.07±0.01a | 0.12±0.01a | 0.11±0.00a | |
CK | Sp/Sb | 0.05±0.02b | 0.02±0.01c | 0.03±0.01a | 0.03±0.00c | 0.04±0.01c |
#1 | 0.09±0.00b | 0.08±0.02b | 0.06±0.01a | 0.10±0.01a | 0.11±0.00ab | |
#2 | 0.15±0.02a | 0.12±0.01a | 0.06±0.02a | 0.12±0.01a | 0.11±0.01ab | |
#3 | 0.08±0.01b | 0.07±0.01b | 0.06±0.01a | 0.07±0.00b | 0.09±0.01b | |
#9 | 0.12±0.03a | 0.10±0.01ab | 0.04±0.01a | 0.11±0.02a | 0.13±0.01a | |
CK | Sn/Sa | 0.15±0.02a | 0.13±0.01a | 0.14±0.01a | 0.18±0.02a | 0.11±0.01a |
#1 | 0.14±0.03a | 0.16±0.01a | 0.13±0.03a | 0.19±0.02a | 0.10±0.01a | |
#2 | 0.14±0.02a | 0.13±0.01a | 0.17±0.04a | 0.15±0.03a | 0.09±0.02a | |
#3 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.13±0.03a | 0.17±0.03a | 0.16±0.03a | 0.11±0.02a | |
#9 | 0.13±0.02a | 0.11±0.02a | 0.18±0.02a | 0.15±0.02a | 0.10±0.01a | |
CK | Sn/Sp | 0.64±0.05a | 0.65±0.03a | 0.52±0.07ab | 0.77±0.04a | 0.62±0.02a |
#1 | 0.69±0.08a | 0.65±0.07a | 0.46±0.04b | 0.76±0.02a | 0.70±0.07a | |
#2 | 0.68±0.04a | 0.72±0.02a | 0.64±0.10ab | 0.66±0.06a | 0.66±0.05a | |
#3 | 0.63±0.04a | 0.68±0.07a | 0.75±0.11a | 0.75±0.07a | 0.61±0.06a | |
#9 | 0.67±0.06a | 0.80±0.08a | 0.73±0.06a | 0.73±0.02a | 0.72±0.04a | |
CK | Sa/Sb | 0.11±0.01b | 0.11±0.03c | 0.10±0.03a | 0.11±0.01c | 0.22±0.02b |
#1 | 0.36±0.04a | 0.35±0.11bc | 0.29±0.13a | 0.36±0.04ab | 0.75±0.10a | |
#2 | 0.54±0.10a | 0.59±0.01ab | 0.26±0.11a | 0.54±0.10a | 0.93±0.25a | |
#3 | 0.33±0.05a | 0.36±0.10bc | 0.30±0.11a | 0.33±0.05b | 0.64±0.23b | |
#9 | 0.49±0.07a | 0.78±0.11a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.49±0.07ab | 0.87±0.10a |
陈辉惶, 温俊宝, 朱银飞, 等. 转基因杨树棉复合系统对节肢动物群落结构的影响. 新疆农业大学学报, 2012, 35 (3): 189- 195.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8614.2012.03.004 |
|
Chen H H , Wen J B , Zhu Y F , et al. Effects of transgenic poplar-cotton compound ecosystem on the stucture of arthropod community. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2012, 35 (3): 189- 195.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8614.2012.03.004 |
|
陈盼飞, 任亚超, 张军, 等. 8年生嫁接转基因杨树Bt毒蛋白的表达与运输. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (7): 46- 52. | |
Chen P F , Ren Y C , Zhang J , et al. Expression and transportation of Bt toxic protein in 8-year-old grafted transgenic poplar. Scientla Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (7): 46- 52. | |
丁莉萍, 王宏芝, 魏建华. 杨树转基因研究进展及展望. 林业科学研究, 2016, 29 (1): 124- 132.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2016.01.018 |
|
Ding L P , Wang H Z , Wei J H . Progress and prospect of research in transgenic poplar. Forest Research, 2016, 29 (1): 124- 132.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2016.01.018 |
|
胡建军, 李淑梅, 卢孟柱, 等. 转Bt基因欧洲黑杨抗虫稳定性及其对天敌昆虫的影响. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20 (5): 656- 659.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2007.05.011 |
|
Hu J J , Li S M , Lu M Z , et al. Stability of insect resistance of Bt transformed Populus nigra plantation and its effects on the natural enanies of insects. Forest Research, 2007, 20 (5): 656- 659.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2007.05.011 |
|
胡建军, 卢孟柱, 杨敏生. 我国抗虫转基因杨树生态安全性研究进展. 生物多样性, 2010, 18 (4): 336- 345. | |
Hu J J , Lu M Z , Yang M S . Research progress on ecological safety of insect-resistant transgenic poplar in China. Biodiversity Science, 2010, 18 (4): 336- 345. | |
胡金林. 中国农林蜘蛛. 天津: 天津科学技术出版社, 1983. | |
Hu J L . Chinese agricultural and forestry spiders. Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press, 1983. | |
姜韬. 2018. 三种转基因玉米对害虫天敌种群动态及生长发育的影响. 扬州: 扬州大学. | |
Jiang T. 2018. Effects of three kinds of transgenic maize on population dynamics and growth of natural enemies of pests. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University. [in Chinese] | |
姜文虎, 刘军侠, 李超丽. 区组混栽转基因杨树林节肢动物群落结构研究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 42 (3): 383- 387.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2011.03.011 |
|
Jiang W H , Liu J X , Li C L . Study on community structure of arthropod in transgenic poplar with mixed cultivating. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 42 (3): 383- 387.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2011.03.011 |
|
姜文虎, 张德健, 刘军侠, 等. 转Bt基因和非转基因杨树-棉花复合系统中节肢动物群落比较分析. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (10): 73- 79.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181009 |
|
Jiang W H , Zhang D J , Liu J X , et al. Comparative analysis of arthropod communities in transgenic Bt and non-transgenic poplar-cotton composite systems. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (10): 73- 79.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181009 |
|
李立. 2009. 转抗虫基因三倍体毛白杨成年树木外源基因表达稳定性研究. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
Li L. 2009. Expression stability of a Bt+API construct in transformed triploid populus tomentosa plants infulence of isogenic lines and plant age. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei. [in Chinese] | |
李探, 姜文虎, 郭萌萌, 等. 转抗虫基因杨树林节肢动物群落与多样性变化研究. 河北农业大学学报, 2018, 41 (3): 84- 88. | |
Li T , Jiang W H , Guo M M , et al. Study on the changes in biodiversity of arthropod community in transgenic insect-resistant poplar. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2018, 41 (3): 84- 88. | |
凌闵. 浅谈转基因植物在我国农业上的应用现状及未来. 上海农业科技, 2020, (6): 10- 13.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0106.2020.06.004 |
|
Ling M . Talking about the application status and future of transgenic plants in agriculture in my country. Shanghai Agricultural Science & Technology, 2020, (6): 10- 13.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0106.2020.06.004 |
|
刘冬艳, 张斌, 曹杨宇, 等. 转抗虫基因杨树外源基因表达的研究进展. 河北林果研究, 2015, 30 (3): 33- 37. | |
Liu D Y , Zhang B , Cao Y Y , et al. The advances in expression of foreign genes in transgenic insect-resistance poplar. Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research, 2015, 30 (3): 33- 37. | |
刘洁. 2015. 转抗虫基因741杨对节肢动物群落结构及动态的影响. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
Liu J. 2015. Effect of transgenic insect resistant gene poplar 741 on arthropod community structure and dynamics. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei. [in Chinese] | |
吕威, 卢楠, 侯荣轩, 等. 12年生转基因毛白杨外源基因转移及其对土壤微生物的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46 (9): 1- 6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2018.09.001 |
|
Lü W , Lu N , Hou R X , et al. Exogenous gene transfer of 12 a transgenic populus[(Populus tomentosa×P.bolleana) ×P.tomentosa] and its effect on soil microbial quantity. Jouranl of Northeast Forestry University, 2018, 46 (9): 1- 6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2018.09.001 |
|
任亚超. 2013. 多基因植物转化载体对烟草和欧美杨107杨的遗传转化. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
Ren Y C. 2013. Genetic transformation of poplar 107 from tobacco and European and American poplars by multigene plant transformation vectors. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei. [in Chinese] | |
睢 ![]() |
|
Sui W , Yan R X , Fu L H , et al. Advances in studies on resistance of poplar to Lepidoptera pests. Garden of Science and Technology, 2019, (1): 34- 38. | |
田亚坤. 2014. 转基因741杨树对节肢动物群落及土壤微生物的影响. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
Tian Y K. 2014. Effects of transgenic hybrid poplar 741 on arthropod community and soil microorganism. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei. [in Chinese] | |
王璞, 郭同斌, 魏辉, 等. 转Bt基因'南林895'杨对美国白蛾和杨小舟蛾抗虫性分析. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18 (14): 4645- 4656. | |
Wang F , Guo T B , Wei H , et al. Analysis of insect resistance of Bt-transgenic poplar (NL-895) to Hyphantria cunea and Micromelalopha troglodyte. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18 (14): 4645- 4656. | |
王智, 张军, 王连荣, 等. 转抗虫基因741杨嫁接苗对目标昆虫的抗性分析. 河北农业大学学报, 2014, 37 (1): 74- 79. | |
Wang Z , Zhang J , Wang L R. , et al. Poplar seedlings grafted carring the insect resistance gene resistance analysis of the target insects. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2014, 37 (1): 74- 79. | |
武二忠. 2011. 转基因抗虫棉对棉大卷叶螟及其主要天敌的影响. 扬州: 扬州大学. | |
Wu E Z. 2011. Effect of transgenic cotton cultivars on sylepta derogate fabricius and its main natural enemies. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University. [in Chinese] | |
夏兰芹, 王远, 郭三堆. 外源基因在转基因植物中的表达与稳定性. 生物技术通报, 2000, (3): 8- 12. | |
Xia L Q , Wang Y , Gou S D . The stability of the expression of foreign genes in transgenic plants. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2000, (3): 8- 12. | |
夏敬源, 崔金杰, 马丽华, 等. 转Bt基因抗虫棉在害虫综合治理中的作用研究. 棉花学报, 1999, 11 (2): 2- 9. | |
Xia J J , Cui J J , Ma L H , et al. Study on the effect of transgenic Bt cotton on integrated pest management. Cotton Science, 1999, 11 (2): 2- 9. | |
杨双. 转基因作物发展状况及趋势. 中国种业, 2018, 278 (5): 36- 40. | |
Yang S . Development status and trend of transgenic crops. China Seed Industry, 2018, 278 (5): 36- 40. | |
杨艳丽, 刘兴菊, 刘桂林, 等. 双抗虫基因转化欧美杨107的研究. 北方园艺, 2012, (7): 120- 122. | |
Yang Y L , Liu X J , Liu G L , et al. Study on two insect-resistance gene transformation of poplar 107. Northern Horticulture, 2012, (7): 120- 122. | |
姚丽, 高宝嘉. 转基因741杨对节肢动物群落结构的影响. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31 (5): 480- 486. | |
Yao L , Gao B J . Effect of arthropod community structure in transgenic hybrid poplar 741. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31 (5): 480- 486. | |
张芳. 2004. 转双抗虫基因741杨对节肢动物群落及动态的影响. 保定: 河北农业大学. | |
Zhang F. 2004. Effects on dynamics in arthropod community and population of transgenic hybrid Poplar 741 with two insect-resistance. Baoding: Agricultural University of Hebei. [in Chinese] | |
张巍巍, 李元胜. 中国昆虫生态大图鉴. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2011. | |
Zhang W W , Li Y S . Great ecological illustrations of China. Chongqing: Chongqing Uiversity Press, 2011. | |
赵蓬晖, 李淑梅, 晏增, 等. 转基因欧洲黑杨土壤微生物状况和酶活性分析. 河南林业科技, 2010, 30 (4): 1- 4. | |
Zhao P H , Li S M , Yan Z , et al. The Affection on soil microorganism and enzyme activity of transgenic Populus nigra. Journal of Henan Forestry Science and Technology, 2010, 30 (4): 1- 4. | |
周晓静, 申坚定, 李金玲, 等. 转基因抗虫植物的发展现状. 农业科技通讯, 2018, (9): 16- 18. | |
Zhou X J , Shen J D , Li J L , et al. Development status of transgenic insect-resistant plants. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, (9): 16- 18. | |
Wang G Y , Dong Y , Liu X J , et al. The current status and development of insect resistant genetically engineered poplar in China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, (9): 1- 15. | |
Zhang B Y , Chen M , Zhang X F , et al. Expression of Bt-Cry3A in transgenic Populus alba × P. glandulosa and its effects on target and non-target pests and the arthropod community. Transgenic Research, 2011, 20 (3): 523- 532. | |
Zuo L , Yang R , Zhen Z , et al. A 5-year field study showed no apparent effect of the Bt transgenic 741 poplar on the arthropod community and soil bacterial diversity. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8 (1): 1- 13. |
[1] | Shuzi Zhang,Jianting Yin,Qiwen Ren,Shubin Zhang,Xin Wang,Liandi Li,Jun Bi. Effect of Dominant Species on Diversity Pattern of Neighbor Species in Coniferous-Broadleaved Mixed Forest in Northern Hebei Mountains [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 32-39. |
[2] | Wenting Pan,Jianjun Sun,Qinqin Yuan,Lili Zhang,Kangqiao Deng,Yueqiao Li. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Structure in Different Provenances of Liriodendron by RAD-seq Technique [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 74-81. |
[3] | Huang Shaoxian, Wang Hongxiang, Peng Hui, Wang Yaoyi, Li Yuanfa, Ye Shaoming. Analysis of Second-Order Characteristics of Tree Species Dominance in an Old Growth Forest Community in Yachang Nature Reserve [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(4): 128-140. |
[4] | Chen Liu,Chunyu Zhang,Xiuhai Zhao. Effects of Disturtance by Thinning on Productivity Stability of Conifer-Broadleaf Mixed Forest in Jiaohe, Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 1-9. |
[5] | Cong Li,Jinghua Lu,Mei Lu,Zhidong Yang,Pan Liu,Yulian Ren,Fan Du. Distribution of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen across Different Altitudinal Vegetation Zones in Wenshan National Nature Reserve [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 20-30. |
[6] | Feiran Jia,Zhongfu Zhou,Wenxia Zhao,Huiquan Sun,Yanxia Yao. Diversity of Gut Microorganisms in Natural Population of Agrilus mali (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 86-96. |
[7] | Liangliang Zhu,Tai'an Chen,Yongjun Zheng,Kairui Zhang,Jun Zhang,Mei Zheng,Rongbo Zheng. Preparation and Enhanced Photostability of TiO2@SiO2-Delignified Wood [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(3): 129-138. |
[8] | Jingen Peng,Jinyu Gong,Yuhai Fan,Hua Zhang,Yinfeng Zhang,Yuqing Bai,Yanmei Wang,Lijuan Xie. Diversity of Soil Microbial Communities in Rhizosphere and Non-rhizosphere of Rhododendron moulmainense [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(2): 89-99. |
[9] | Weixi Zhang,Yanbo Wang,Changjun Ding,Wenxu Zhu,Xiaohua Su. Detection of Horizontal Transfer of the Exogenous Gene in Adult Trees of Transgenic Populus alba × P. berolinensis in a Field Trial and Successive Years of Monitoring of Soil Microorganism [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 52-61. |
[10] | Wenzhen Liu,Yichao Yuan,Lianjin Zhang,Zhonghua Zhao. Stability Evaluation of Pinus tabulaeformis Forest Based on Its Internal Status and Neighborhood Environment [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(9): 76-86. |
[11] | Xuan Fang,Jingwei Wen,Yue Chen,Min Fan,Xingxia Ma. Fungal Diversity of Wooden Flume Unearthed from Nanyue National Palace Site under in situ Preservation Environment [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(7): 131-141. |
[12] | Dengkang Guo,Xiaoshuang Shen,Sheng Yang,Yaoge Huang,Gaiyun Li,Fuxiang Chu. The Mechanism to Improve the Dimensional Stability of Wood with Modification of Water-Soluble Vinyl Monomers [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(7): 158-165. |
[13] | Chaoqun Du,Xiaomei Sun,Yunhui Xie,Yimei Hou. Genetic Diversity of Larix kaempferi Populations with Different Levels of Improvement in Northern Subtropical Region [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(5): 68-76. |
[14] | Yutong Yang,Qingshuo Zhang,Yunlin Fu,Jing Sun. Components, Stability and Antioxidant Activity of Pigment from Dalbergia bariensis Heartwood [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(3): 126-134. |
[15] | Gangying Hui,Zhonghua Zhao,Gongqiao Zhang,Yanbo Hu. The Role of Random Structural Pattern Based on Uniform Angle Index in Maintaining Forest Stability [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(2): 22-30. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||