Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (9): 130-139.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210913
Previous Articles Next Articles
Xuan Song1,2,3,Zehua Wang1,Guoyue Yu1,Fan Wang1,4,Shuang Shan2,Yongjun Zhang2,Shanning Wang1,*
Received:
2019-11-26
Online:
2021-09-25
Published:
2021-11-29
Contact:
Shanning Wang
CLC Number:
Xuan Song,Zehua Wang,Guoyue Yu,Fan Wang,Shuang Shan,Yongjun Zhang,Shanning Wang. Localization, Ligand Binding Characteristics and Ligand Activity of an Odorant Binding Protein, AplaOBP2, from Agrilus planipennis[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(9): 130-139.
Table 1
Binding capabilities of the recombinant AplaOBP2 to candidate ligands"
配体 Ligand | 来源 Source | CAS号 CAS No. | 纯度 Purity(%) | IC50/(μmol·L-1) | KD/(μmol·L-1) |
醇类Alcohols | |||||
1-己醇1-hexanol* | TCI | 111-27-3 | >98.0 | — | — |
反-2-己烯-1-醇trans-2-hexen-1-ol | TCI | 928-95-0 | >95.0 | — | — |
顺-2-己烯-1-醇cis-2-hexen-1-ol | TCI | 928-94-9 | >93.0 | — | — |
反-3-己烯-1-醇trans-3-hexen-1-ol | Sigma | 928-97-2 | 97.0 | — | — |
顺-3-己烯-1-醇cis-3-hexen-1-ol* | TCI | 928-96-1 | >97.0 | — | — |
反4-己烯-1-醇trans-4-hexen-1-ol | Sigma | 928-92-7 | ≥96.0 | — | — |
1-辛醇1-octanol | TCI | 111-87-5 | >99.0 | — | — |
2-苯乙醇2-phenylethyl alcohol | TCI | 60-12-8 | >98.0 | — | — |
醛类Aldehydes | |||||
丁醛Butyraldehyde | TCI | 123-72-8 | >98.0 | — | — |
戊醛Valeraldehyde | TCI | 110-62-3 | >95.0 | — | — |
己醛Hexanal* | TCI | 66-25-1 | >98.0 | — | — |
反-2-己烯醛trans-2-hexenal* | TCI | 6728-26-3 | >97.0 | 7.41±0.20 | 4.44±0.12 |
反-2-庚烯醛trans-2-heptenal | TCI | 18829-55-5 | >95.0 | 6.95±0.10 | 4.17±0.06 |
正辛醛n-octanal | TCI | 124-13-0 | >98.0 | — | — |
壬醛Nonanal* | TCI | 124-19-6 | >95.0 | — | — |
苯甲醛Benzaldehyde | TCI | 100-52-7 | >98.0 | 8.66±0.31 | 5.20±0.18 |
烷类Alkanes | |||||
正辛烷Octane | TCI | 111-65-9 | >97.0 | — | — |
癸烷Decane* | TCI | 124-18-5 | >99.0 | — | — |
十一烷Undecane | TCI | 1120-21-4 | >99.0 | — | — |
十二烷Dodecane* | TCI | 112-40-3 | >99.0 | — | — |
十三烷Tridecane | TCI | 629-50-5 | >99.0 | — | — |
酯类Esters | |||||
苯乙酸甲酯Methyl phenylacetate | TCI | 101-41-7 | >99.0 | — | — |
水杨酸甲酯Methyl salicylate* | TCI | 119-36-8 | >99.0 | — | — |
丁酸顺式-3-己烯酯cis-3-hexenyl butyrate* | Sigma | 16491-36-4 | ≥98.0 | — | — |
苯甲酸甲酯Methyl benzoate | TCI | 93-58-3 | >99.0 | — | — |
丙烯酸异丁酯Isobutyl acrylate | TCI | 106-63-8 | >99.0 | — | — |
丁酸己酯Hexyl butyrate | TCI | 2639-63-6 | >98.0 | — | — |
乙酸反-2-己烯酯trans-2-hexenyl acetate | TCI | 2497-18-9 | >97.0 | — | — |
丁酸反-2-己烯基酯trans-2-hexenyl butyrate | TCI | 53398-83-7 | >93.0 | — | — |
乙酸己酯Hexyl acetate* | TCI | 142-92-7 | >99.0 | — | — |
乙酸顺-3-己烯酯cis-3-hexenyl acetate* | TCI | 3681-71-8 | >97.0 | — | — |
惕各酸异丁酯Isobutyl tiglate | TCI | 61692-84-0 | >96.0 | — | — |
酮类Ketones | |||||
2-庚酮2-heptanone | TCI | 110-43-0 | >98.0 | — | — |
2-辛酮2-octanone | TCI | 111-13-7 | >98.0 | — | — |
4′-乙基苯乙酮4′-ethylacetophenone* | TCI | 937-30-4 | >97.0 | 4.85±0.14 | 2.91±0.09 |
3′, 4′-二甲氧基苯乙酮 3′, 4′-dimethoxyacetophenone | TCI | 1131-62-0 | >98.0 | 5.76±0.17 | 3.45±0.10 |
β-紫罗兰酮β-ionone | TCI | 14901-07-6 | >95.0 | 1.05±0.05 | 0.63±0.03 |
萜烯类Terpenes | |||||
β-蒎烯β-pinene* | 麦克林Maclin | 127-91-3 | ≥95 | — | — |
(1R)-(+)-α-蒎烯(1R)-(+)-α-pinene* | TCI | 7785-70-8 | >97.0 | — | — |
月桂烯Myrcene* | 麦克林Maclin | 123-35-3 | ≥90.0 | — | — |
3-蒈烯3-carene* | 麦克林Maclin | 13466-78-9 | 90.0 | — | — |
(+)-柠檬烯(+)-limonene* | TCI | 5989-27-5 | >95.0 | — | — |
松油醇Terpineol | Sigma | 8000-41-7 | ≥96 | — | — |
α-松油烯α-terpinene | TCI | 99-86-5 | >90.0 | — | — |
橙花叔醇Nerolidol* | TCI | 7212-44-4 | >97.0 | — | — |
α-葎草烯α-humulene* | TCI | 6753-98-6 | >93.0 | — | — |
α-可巴烯α-copaene* | 化学慧Chemhui | 3856-25-5 | >90.0 | — | — |
香叶醇Geraniol | TCI | 106-24-1 | >96.0 | — | — |
金合欢烯Farnesene* | Sigma | 502-61-4 | >90.0 | — | — |
罗勒烯Ocimene* | Sigma | 13877-91-3 | ≥90.0 | — | — |
β-石竹烯β-caryophyllene* | TCI | 87-44-5 | >90.0 | — | — |
(-)-氧化石竹烯(-)-caryophyllene oxide* | Sigma | 1139-30-6 | 95.0 | — | — |
芳樟醇Linalool* | TCI | 78-70-6 | >96.0 | — | — |
1, 8-桉树脑1, 8-cineole* | TCI | 470-82-6 | >99.0 | — | — |
柠檬醛Citral | TCI | 5392-40-5 | >96.0 | — | — |
(-)-香茅醛(-)-citronellal | TCI | 5949-05-3 | >96.0 | — | — |
其他Others | |||||
四氢吡咯Pyrrolidine | TCI | 123-75-1 | >98.0 | — | — |
吲哚Indole* | TCI | 120-72-9 | >99.0 | — | — |
Table 2
EAG responses of male and female A. planipennis to the ligands(10 mg·mL-1) of the AplaOBP2"
化合物 Chemical | 标准化EAG Normalized EAG | |
雌虫Female | 雄虫Male | |
反-2-己烯醛 trans-2-hexenal | 0.441±0.045 abA | 0.533±0.116 aA |
反-2-庚烯醛 trans-2-heptenal | 0.613±0.097 aA | 0.509±0.074 aA |
苯甲醛 Benzaldehyde | 0.270±0.064 bcA | 0.192±0.074 bA |
4′-乙基苯乙酮 4′-ethylacetophenone | 0.182±0.093 bcA | 0.130±0.046 bA |
3′, 4′-二甲基苯乙酮 3′, 4′-dimethylacetophenone | 0.091±0.037 cA | 0.146±0.032 bA |
β-紫罗兰酮 β-ionone | 0.027±0.031 cA | 0.049±0.025 bA |
Fig.6
Behavioral responses of male and female A. planipennis to the ligands(10 mg·mL-1) of the AplaOBP2 The Chi-square test was used for data analysis. The asterisk indicate significant difference between the treatment and the control(paraffin oil) at the 0.05 level, while ns indicates no significant difference(P>0.05)."
杨叶青, 王山宁, 彭勇, 等. 气味结合蛋白MmedOBP19在中红侧沟茧蜂足部的表达及配体结合特征. 昆虫学报, 2017, 60 (6): 613- 620. | |
Yang Y Q , Wang S N , Peng Y , et al. Expression of the odor binding protein MmedOBP19 in the legs of Microplitis mediator(Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and its ligand binding characteristics. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2017, 60 (6): 613- 620. | |
Andersson M N , Keeling C I , Mitchell R F . Genomic content of chemosensory genes correlates with host range in wood-boring beetles(Dendroctonus ponderosae, Agrilus planipennis, and Anoplophora glabripennis). BMC Genomics, 2019, 20 (1): 1- 17.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5379-1 |
|
Binyameen M , Anderson P , Ignell R , et al. Spatial organization of antennal olfactory sensory neurons in the female Spodoptera littoralis moth: differences in sensitivity and temporal characteristics. Chemical Senses, 2012, 37 (7): 613- 629.
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs043 |
|
Bradford M M . A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 72 (1/2): 248- 254. | |
Bruce T J , Wadhams L J , Woodcock C M . Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science, 2005, 10 (6): 269- 274.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.04.003 |
|
Cáceres L A , Lakshminarayan S , Yeung K C , et al. Repellent and attractive effects of α-, β-, and Dihydro-β-lonone to generalist and specialist herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2016, 42 (2): 107- 117.
doi: 10.1007/s10886-016-0669-z |
|
Crook D J , Khrimian A , Francese J A , et al. Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis(Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environmental Entomology, 2008a, 37 (2): 356- 365.
doi: 10.1093/ee/37.2.356 |
|
Crook D J , Kerr L M , Mastro V C . Distribution and fine structure of antennal sensilla in emerald ash borer(Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Annals of the Entomological Society America, 2008b, 101 (6): 1103- 1111.
doi: 10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1103 |
|
de Groot P , Grant G G , Poland T M , et al. Electrophysiological response and attraction of emerald ash borer to green leaf volatiles(GLVs) emitted by host foliage. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2008, 34 (9): 1170.
doi: 10.1007/s10886-008-9514-3 |
|
Dippel S , Oberhofer G , Kahnt J , et al. Tissue-specific transcriptomics, chromosomal localization, and phylogeny of chemosensory and odorant binding proteins from the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum reveal subgroup specificities for olfaction or more general functions. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15, 1141.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1141 |
|
Forêt S , Maleszka R . Function and evolution of a gene family encoding odorant binding-like proteins in a social insect, the honey bee(Apis mellifera). Genome Research, 2006, 16 (11): 1404- 1413.
doi: 10.1101/gr.5075706 |
|
Grant G G , Poland T M , Tina C , et al. Comparison of male and female emerald ash borer(Coleoptera: Buprestidae) responses to phoebe oil and(Z)-3-hexenol lures in light green prism traps. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2011, 104 (1): 173- 179.
doi: 10.1603/EC10197 |
|
Grant G G , Ryall K L , Lyons D B , et al. Differential response of male and female emerald ash borers(Col., Buprestidae) to(Z)-3-hexenol and manuka oil. Journal of Applied Entomolology, 2010, 134 (1): 26- 33. | |
Gu S H , Wang W X , Wang G R , et al. Functional characterization and immunolocalization of odorant binding protein 1 in the lucerne plant bug, Adelphocoris lineolatus (GOEZE). Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2011, 77 (2): 81- 99.
doi: 10.1002/arch.20427 |
|
Hansson B S , Stensmyr M C . Evolution of insect olfaction. Neuron, 2011, 72 (5): 698- 711.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.003 |
|
Hekmat-Scafe D S , Scafe C R , McKinney A J , et al. Genome-wide analysis of the odorant-binding protein gene family in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Research, 2002, 12 (9): 1357- 1369.
doi: 10.1101/gr.239402 |
|
Herms D A , McCullough D G . Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annual Review Entomology, 2014, 59 (1): 13- 30.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162051 |
|
Huang G Z , Liu J T , Zhou J J , et al. Expressional and functional comparisons of two general odorant binding proteins in Agrotis ipsilon. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2018, 98, 34- 47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.05.003 |
|
Jiang X C , Ryl M , Krieger J , et al. Odorant binding proteins of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria(Orthoptera, Acrididae): topographic expression patterns in the antennae. Frontiers in Physiology, 2018, 9, 417.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00417 |
|
Krieger J , Breer H . Olfactory reception in invertebrates. Science, 1999, 286 (5440): 720- 723.
doi: 10.1126/science.286.5440.720 |
|
Larter N K , Sun J S , Carlson J R . Organization and function of Drosophila odorant binding proteins. eLife, 2016, 5, e20242.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.20242 |
|
Laue M , Steinbrecht R A , Ziegelberger G . Immunocytochemical localization of general odorant-binding protein in olfactory sensilla of the silkmoth Antheraea polyphemus. Naturwissenschaften, 1994, 81 (4): 178- 180. | |
Leal W S . Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annual Review of Entomology, 2013, 58 (1): 373- 391.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153635 |
|
Mamidala P , Wijeratne A J , Wijeratne S , et al. Identification of odor-processing genes in the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 (2): e56555.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056555 |
|
McKenzie S K , Oxley P R , Kronauer D J . Comparative genomics and transcriptomics in ants provide new insights into the evolution and function of odorant binding and chemosensory proteins. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15 (1): 718.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-718 |
|
Morin R S , Liebhold A M , Pugh S A , et al. Regional assessment of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, impacts in forests of the Eastern United States. Biological Invasions, 2017, 19 (2): 703- 711.
doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1296-x |
|
Pelletier J , Guidolin A , Syed Z , et al. Knockdown of a mosquito odorant-binding protein involved in the sensitive detection of oviposition attractants. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2010, 36 (3): 245- 248.
doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9762-x |
|
Pelosi P , Iovinella I , Felicioli A , et al. Soluble proteins of chemical communication: an overview across arthropods. Frontiers in Physiology, 2014, 5, 320. | |
Pelosi P , Iovinella I , Zhu J , et al. Beyond chemoreception: Diverse tasks of soluble olfactory proteins in insects. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2017, 93 (1): 184- 200. | |
Pelosi P . Perireceptor events in olfaction. J Neurobiol, 1996, 30 (1): 3- 19.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199605)30:1<3::AID-NEU2>3.0.CO;2-A |
|
Pikielny C W , Hasan G , Rouyer F , et al. Members of a family of Drosophila putative odorant-binding proteins are expressed in different subsets of olfactory hairs. Neuron, 1994, 12 (1): 35- 49.
doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90150-3 |
|
Rigsby C M , Mccartney N B , Herms D A , et al. Variation in the volatile profiles of black and manchurian ash in relation to emerald ash borer oviposition preferences. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2017, 43 (8): 831- 842.
doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0873-5 |
|
Rodriguez-Saona C , Poland T M , Miller J R , et al. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, to induced volatiles of manchurian ash, Fraxinus mandshurica. Chemoecology, 2006, 16 (2): 75- 86.
doi: 10.1007/s00049-005-0329-1 |
|
Silk P J , Ryall K , Barry Lyons D , et al. A contact sex pheromone component of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire(Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Naturwissenschaften, 2009, 96 (5): 601- 608.
doi: 10.1007/s00114-009-0513-1 |
|
Steinbrecht R A , Laue M , Ziegelberger G . Immunolocalization of pheromone-binding protein and general odorant-binding protein in olfactory sensilla of the silk moths Antheraea and Bombyx. Cell and Tissue Research, 1995, 282 (2): 203- 217.
doi: 10.1007/BF00319112 |
|
Steinbrecht R A . Pore structures in insect olfactory sensilla: a review of data and concepts. International Journal of Insect Morphology Embryology, 1997, 26 (3/4): 229- 245. | |
Sun X , Zhao Z F , Zeng F F , et al. Functional characterization of a pheromone-binding protein from rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis in detecting pheromones and host plant volatiles. Bulletin Entomological Research, 2016, 106 (6): 781- 789.
doi: 10.1017/S0007485316000560 |
|
Takken W . The role of olfaction in host-seeking of mosquitoes: a review. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 1991, 12 (1-3): 287- 295. | |
Vet L E M , Dicke M . Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology, 1992, 37, 141- 172.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001041 |
|
Vieira F G , Rozas J . Comparative genomics of the odorant-binding and chemosensory protein gene families across the Arthropoda: origin and evolutionary history of the chemosensory system. Genome Biology Evolouion, 2011, 3, 476- 490.
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr033 |
|
Visser J H . Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 1986, 31, 121- 144.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.001005 |
|
Vogt R G , Riddiford L M . Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae. Nature, 1981, 293 (5828): 161- 163.
doi: 10.1038/293161a0 |
|
Wang S N , Shan S , Liu J T , et al. Characterization of antennal chemosensilla and associated odorant binding as well as chemosensory proteins in the parasitoid wasp Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Scientific Reports, 2018, 8, 7649.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25996-3 |
|
Wang S N , Shan S , Yu G Y , et al. Identification of odorant-binding proteins and functional analysis of antenna-specific AplaOBP1 in the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. Journal of Pest Science, 2020, 93 (2): 853- 865.
doi: 10.1007/s10340-019-01188-4 |
|
Wilson R I , Mainen Z F . Early events in olfactory processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2006, 29, 163- 201.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112950 |
|
Xu P X , Atkinson R , Jones D N , et al. Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons. Neuron, 2005, 45 (2): 193- 200.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.031 |
|
Ye Z F , Liu X L , Han Q , et al. Functional characterization of PBP1 gene in Helicoverpa armigera(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 8470.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08769-2 |
|
Zacharuk R Y . Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Annual Review Entomology, 1980, 25, 27- 47.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.000331 |
[1] | Yingqiao Dang,Yanlong Zhang,Xiaoyi Wang,Ke Wei,Zhongqi Yang. Tolerability of Emerald Ash Borer to High Temperature and Humidity [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(3): 189-194. |
[2] | Song Liwen;Li Xingpeng;Zhang Jian;Chen Yuequ;Zuo Tongtong. Review on Olfactory Recognition and Behavioral Responses of Conifer Bark Beetles to Nonhost Volatiles [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(12): 93-100. |
[3] | Cheng Bin;Fu Xiaoxia;Han Qi;Zhang Baomin;Zhang Daming;Li Xingpeng;Gao Changqi;Sun Xiaoling. Effects of Herbivore-Induced Ulmus pumila Volatiles on the Host Selection Process of Ambrostoma quadriimpressum [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(10): 76-82. |
[4] | Zhang Zhen;Chi Defu;Yu Jia;Li Xiaocan;Zhao Xiaojie. EAG and Behavioral Responses of Xylotrechus rusticus to Thirteen Plant Volatiles Zhang ZhenChi DefuYu JiaLi XiaocanZhao Xiaojie [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(10): 69-75. |
[5] | Yan Shanchun;Yang Hui;Gao Lulu;Wang Zhibo;Mao Hongbo. Responses of Coleophora obducta to Larch Volatile Compositions [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(5): 94-101. |
[6] | Li Juan;Wang Manqun;Zhang Zhichun;Chen Jingyuan;Zhang Guo'an. Behavioral Response of Batocera horsfieldi Adults to Plant Volatiles [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(6): 171-175. |
[7] | Yan Shanchun;Liu Yingsheng;Wang Qi;Cheng Hong;Zhang Jian;Chi Defu. Electroantennogram Responses of Dendrolimus superans to Six Volatiles of Larix gmelinii [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2007, 43(7): 55-60. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||