太湖岸带湿地土壤动物群落结构与土壤理化性质的关系

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130715

Abstract

Abstract:

The soil fauna, as an important part of the wetland ecosystem, has attracted more and more attention. They play a vital role in the material circulation and wetland restoration processes. In August 2010, we investigated soil animals in different vegetation covers (A: Rumex acetosa lakeshore, B: Tree and shrub lakeshore, C: Crop lakeshore, D: Natural reed lakeshore) at Lake Taihu lakeshore wetland with Tullgren and Baermann's methods. A total 537 soil animal individuals were extracted and classified into four phyla, and 59 taxonomic groups. R. acetosa lakeshore (A) had the lowest density of soil animals (4 017 ind·m^-2), while tree and shrub lakeshore (B) had the highest density of soil animals (14 496 ind·m^-2). There were differences in soil animal community space similarity over the four vegetation cover types, suggesting that vegetation cover types had an impact on soil animal community species composition, richness of communities and the number of dominant groups. The horizontal distribution pattern of the soil animals in the number of individuals was B > C> D > A. The canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to analyze the correlations between the distribution of soil animal communities in the different caver types and the soil moisture content, pH, conductivity, soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), or soil temperature. The result showed that different soil animals had differential responses to different environmental factors, and various soil factors had to different degrees impact on the distribution of soil fauna. Among them, total phosphorous (TP) had a relatively strong impact on the Carabidae larvae, Ceratopogonidae larvae and Liocranidae, while electric conductance (Cond) had strong impact on Neanuridae. SOM had a greater impact on Isotomidae, pH had a greater impact on Onychiuridae, and soil temperature had a greater impact on Enchytraeidae. This study would provide scientific reference for wetland restoration.

Key words: Lake Taihu, soil fauna, biodiversity, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), soil physical and chemical properties

CLC Number:

S718.52⁺1.1

Li Wei, Cui Lijuan, Wang Xiaowen, Zhao Xinsheng, Zhang Manyin, Gao Changjun, Zhang Yan. Relationship between Soil Animal Community Structure and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Lake Taihu Lakeshore, China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(7): 106-113.

References

付秀芹, 张志罡,胡波,等.2007.洞庭湖湿地土壤动物群落特征与土壤质量的关系探讨.农业现代化研究, 28(6): 685-687.

韩立亮,王勇,王广力,等.2007.洞庭湖湿地与农田土壤动物多样性研究.生物多样性, 15(2): 199-206.

黄杰灵,施时迪,王美花,等.2012.西溪国家湿地公园5种人工植物群落土壤动物群落的结构与多样性.浙江大学学报:理学版,39(4): 434-442.

金相灿,刘树坤,章宗涉,等.1995.中国湖泊环境.2册.北京: 海洋出版社, 108-149.

林英华,张夫道,杨学云,等.2004.农田土壤动物与土壤理化性质关系的研究.中国农业科学,37(6): 871-877.

刘扬,张岸,严莹,等.2011.崇明岛不同土地利用类型下土壤动物群落多样性研究.复旦学报:自然科学版, 50(3): 288-295.

刘吉平,杨青,吕宪国,等.2005.三江平原典型环型湿地生物多样性.农村生态环境, 21(3): 1-5.

王广力,王勇,韩立亮,等.2005.洞庭湖区不同土地利用方式下的土壤动物群落结构.生态学报, 25(10): 2629-2636.

王邵军,阮宏华,汪家社,等. 2010.武夷山典型植被类型土壤动物群落的结构特征.生态学报, 30(19): 5174-5184.

王天乐,李伟,丁洁,等.2011.退化湿地恢复中土壤节肢动物的群落结构.南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 35(2): 51-55.

吴鹏飞,杨大星.2011.若尔盖高寒草甸退化对中小型土壤动物群落的影响.生态学报, 31(13): 3745-3757.

武海涛,吕宪国,杨青,等.2008.三江平原湿地岛状林土壤动物群落结构特征及影响因素.北京林业大学学报:自然科学版,30(2): 50-58.

杨青,刘吉平,吕宪国,等. 2004.三江平原典型环型湿地土壤-植被-动物系统的结构及功能研究.生态学杂志, 23(4): 72-77.

殷秀琴,安静超,陶岩,等.2010a.拉萨河流域健康湿地与退化湿地大型土壤动物群落比较研究.资源科学, 32(9): 1643-1649.

殷秀琴,宋博,董炜华,等.2010b.我国土壤动物生态地理研究进展.地理学报, 65(1): 91-102.

尹文英. 1998.中国土壤动物检索图鉴.北京: 科学出版社, 31-150.

尹文英. 2000.中国土壤动物.北京: 科学出版社, 1-50.

张龙龙,鲍毅新,胡知渊,等.2009.溪源湿地秋季不同植被类型土壤动物群落特征初步研究.浙江师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 32(4): 453-459.

张秀娟,杨晨利,倪向利,等.2005.洞庭湖湿地小型节肢土壤动物群落组成及其特征.湖南理工学院学报: 自然科学版, 28(3): 62-65.

章家恩,秦钟,李庆芳.2011.不同土地利用方式下土壤动物群落的聚类与排序.生态学杂志, 30(12): 2849-2856.

Anderson J T, Smith L M. 2000.Invertebrate response to moist-soil management of playa wetlands. Ecological Applications, 10(2): 550-558.

Anke H, Rosenzweig S.2003.Multivariate statistics as a tool for model-based prediction of floodplain vegetation and fauna. Ecological Modelling, 169(1): 73-87.

Brady V J, Cardinale B J, Gathman J P, et al. 2002. Does facilitation of faunal recruitment benefit ecosystem restoration? An experimental study of invertebrate assemblages in wetland mesocosms. Restoration Ecology, 10(4): 617-626.

Bruelheide H, Udelhoven P, Hemerik L, et al. 2002.Diversity of soil macro-invertebrates in grasslands under restoration succession.European Journal of Soil Biology, 38(2): 145-150.

Burger J C, Redak R A, Allen E B, et al.2003.Restoring arthropod communities in coastal sage scrub. Conservation Biology, 17(2): 460-467.

Davis C A, Austin J E, Buhl D A.2006.Factors influencing soil invertebrate communities in riparian grasslands of the central platte river floodplain.Wetlands, 26(2): 438-454.

Hartmut K. 1998.Secondary succession of soil mesofauna: A thirteen year study.Applied Soil Ecology, 9(1/3): 81-86.

Longcore T.2003.Terrestrial arthropods as indicators of ecological restoration success in coastal sage scrub (California, USA).Restoration Ecology, 11(4): 397-409.

Murray P J, Cook R, Currie A F, et al. 2006. Interactions between fertilizer addition, plants and the soil environment: implications for soil faunal structure and diversity.Applied Soil Ecology, 33(2): 199-207.

Neher D. 2001.Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators.Journal of Nematology, 33(4): 161-168.

Volkmar W.2001.Biodiversity of soil animals and its function.European Journal of Soil Biology, 37(4): 221-227.

Wardle D A, Bardgett R D, Klironomos J N, et al. 2004.Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science, 304(5677): 1629-1633.

[1]	Chen Lixia, Liu Huajin, Liu Yulin, Yang Peiyu, Zhang Guogang, Lu Jun. Analysis on the Variation of Waterbird Communities in Different Habitats of Khanka Lake in China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(1): 56-65.
[2]	Zhou Wei, Wang Wenjie, He Xingyuan, Zhang Bo, Xiao Lu, Wang Qiong, Lü Hailiang, Wei Chenhui. Soil Fertility and Spatial Variability of Urban Green Land in Harbin [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(9): 9-17.
[3]	Hao Minhui, Li Xiaoyu, Xia Mengjie, He Huaijiang, Zhang Chunyu, Zhao Xiuhai. Effects of Tending Felling on Functional and Phylogenetic Structures in a Multi-Species Temperate Secondary Forest at Jiaohe in Jilin Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(5): 1-9.
[4]	Feng Qiya, Chen Chaofan, Qin Lin, He Yating, Wang Peng, Duan Yixuan, Wang Yafei, He Youjun. Effects of Different Management Models on Stand Structure and Plant Diversity of Natural Secondary Forests of Quercus Mongolica [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(1): 12-21.
[5]	Zhai Wanlu, Zhong Zheke, Gao Guibin, Yang Huimin. Influence of Mulching Management on Soil Bacterial Structure and Diversity in Phyllostachys praecox Stands [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(9): 133-142.
[6]	Gao Min, Ma Xiangli, Yang Jinyu, Huang Xuanrui, Wu Yanan. Influence of the Mixed Modes of Larch and Birch on Soil Faunal Community in Mountain Area of Northern Hebei, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(1): 70-81.
[7]	Wang Zhenhai, Yin Xiuqin, Zhang Chengmeng. Effects of Soil Fauna Communities on Decomposition of Abies nephrolepis Litter in Changbai Mountains [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(7): 59-67.
[8]	Liu Rentao, Zhu Fan. Effect of Afforested Shrubs on Ground-Dwelling Arthropod Diversity and Throphic Structure in Desertified Grassland Ecosystems [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(2): 91-98.
[9]	Li Qiao, Lu Zhixing, Zhang Wei, Ma Yanyan, Feng Ping. Communities of Ground-Dwelling Ants in Different Plantation Forests in Arid-Hot Valleys of Jinsha River, Yunnan Province, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(8): 134-142.
[10]	Gong Gutang, Niu Mu, Mu Changlong, Chen Junhua, Li Yanqiong, Zhu Zhifang, Zheng Shaowei. Impacts of Different Thinning Intensities on Growth of Cupressus funebris Plantation and Understory Plants [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(4): 8-15.
[11]	Li Chaochan, Yi Yin, Quan Wenxuan, Tian Honghong. The Natural Volatile Components of Allelochemicals in the Wild Alpine Rhododendron Community [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(12): 35-44.
[12]	Wang Wenjun, Yang Wanqin, Tan Bo, Liu Ruilong, Wu Fuzhong. Effects of Soil Fauna to Nitrogen and Phosphorus Releases during Litter Decomposition at Different Phenological Stages in the Subtropical Evergreen Broad-Leaved Forest in Sichuan Basin [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(1): 1-11.
[13]	Wang Qun, Fan Junrong. Discussion of Biodiversity Protection Regulation Problems under the Forest Carbon Sequestration Mechanism [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(9): 148-152.
[14]	Liang Xingyun;He Youjun;Zhang Pu;Rong Jiantao;Qin Lin;Li Zhiyong. Effects of Different Forest Management Regimes on Plant Community Structure and Biodiversity of Natural Secondary Forests in Danqinghe Forestry Farm [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(3): 93-102.
[15]	Zhu Xueling;Liu Xiaojing;Cui Xianghui;Wu Mingzuo;Ye Yongzhong. Species Diversity Characteristics of Quercus spp. Community of Different Series Stage After Fire in Baotianman National Nature Reserve in Neixiang County [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(8): 31-38.

Relationship between Soil Animal Community Structure and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Lake Taihu Lakeshore, China

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments