欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 102-111.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230134

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水位条件下鄱阳湖越冬白鹤的移动模式与栖息地利用

王莹,江红星*,陈丽霞,王艺璇,高彤   

  1. 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所 生物多样性保护国家林业和草原局重点实验室 北京 100091
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-06 出版日期:2023-08-25 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 江红星
  • 基金资助:
    十三五国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0500404);中美白鹤东部迁徙种群保护项目

Movement Pattern and Habitat Utilization of Siberian Cranes Wintering in Poyang Lake under Different Water Levels

Ying Wang,Hongxing Jiang*,Lixia Chen,Yixuan Wang,Tong Gao   

  1. Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute of Chinese Academy of Forestry Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration Beijing 100091
  • Received:2023-04-06 Online:2023-08-25 Published:2023-10-16
  • Contact: Hongxing Jiang

摘要:

目的: 对比分析丰水年和平水年鄱阳湖越冬白鹤的移动模式与栖息地利用,为越冬白鹤的保护和适应性管理提供科学依据。方法: 依据鄱阳湖星子站水位监测数据和湖区白鹤自然食物苦草块茎生物量,将2016年、2017年和2020年、2021年界定为丰水年W1组和W3组,将2018年、2019年界定为平水年W2组。基于2016—2022年13只卫星跟踪白鹤的越冬期定位数据,利用ArcGIS 10.7空间分析功能,对比分析丰水年和平水年越冬期以及越冬不同阶段的白鹤移动距离、活动区面积和栖息地利用的差异。结果: 1)从越冬白鹤的移动模式来看,平水年组越冬期和越冬中期的移动距离均显著小于丰水年组。2)丰水年合并组的不同越冬阶段的90%KDE(Kernel density estimator)(核密度估计法)活动区面积均显著大于平水年W2组,丰水年W1组越冬中期90%和50%KDE活动区面积均显著大于平水年W2组和丰水年W3组。3)从栖息地的利用率来看,平水年越冬期白鹤日间湿地利用率高达89.0% ± 12.3%(n = 9);丰水年组白鹤在越冬期以及越冬前期和中期的日间农田利用率显著高于平水年组,湿地利用率显著低于平水年组。2个丰水年组之间的白鹤农田和湿地利用率无显著差异。白鹤的夜间湿地利用率在平水年越冬期为94.9% ± 8.7%(n = 9),而在丰水年越冬期为84.5% ± 18.4%(n = 15);丰水年W1组和合并组的白鹤越冬中期夜间农田利用率显著高于平水年组。结论: 在丰水年,白鹤通过增加移动距离、活动区面积以及农田栖息地利用比例来应对水位提高造成的食物短缺,来满足自身能量需求和提高适合度。在平水年,自然湿地是鄱阳湖越冬白鹤的主要觅食地和夜宿地。在丰水年,尽管白鹤的日间农田栖息地利用达到50%左右,但夜间仍主要利用自然湿地。加强自然湿地适应性管理,以提高不同水文条件下湿地的功能和恢复力,可确保鄱阳湖白鹤越冬种群的健康安全。

关键词: 白鹤, 鄱阳湖, 移动距离, 活动区, 栖息地利用

Abstract:

Objective: This study aims to document differences in movement pattern and habitat use between high water years and normal water years of Siberian Cranes wintering in Poyang Lake, to benefit crane conservation and adaptive habitat management. Method: Water level data of Xingzi Hydrological Station and tuber biomass of food plant Vallisneria spp. for Siberian Cranes were used to define the different water years. The years of 2016 and 2017, and 2020 and 2021 were defined as high water years, and the first two years were referred as group-W1 and the later as group-W3. While, the years of 2018 and 2019 were defined as normal years or referring as group-W2. Thirteen Siberian Cranes were tracked with satellite transmitters in Poyang Lake from 2016 to 2022. Differences were determined and analyzed with ArcGIS 10.7 in movement distances, home range areas and habitat use of Siberian Cranes between the high water and the normal groups. Result: 1) The Siberian Cranes in the whole winter and in mid-winter moved significantly less during normal years (W2) than those of high water years W1, or W3, or combined. 2) 90% KDE in the three winter periods during the high water years (W1 and W3) were significantly larger than those in the normal years (W2). In mid-winter, home ranges of 90% and 50%KDE in the high water years W1 was significantly larger than those in the normal years (W2) and high water years W3. 3) In normal years (W2), the overall use of wetland in daytime accounts for 89.0% ± 12.3% (n = 9). The use of farmland by the cranes in the whole winter, and in early and middle winters in high water years were significantly higher than those in normal water years (W2). The wetland use in high water years was significantly lower than in normal years, in spite of accounting for 50.4% ± 20.5% (n = 15). There was no significant difference in farmland use or wetland use by the cranes among groups in high water years. In normal years (W2), the overall use of wetland in nighttime accounts for 94.9% ± 8.7% (n = 9); In high water years, the overall use of wetland in night time about 84.5% ± 18.4%(n = 15). The use of farmland by the cranes in middle winters in high water years (W1 and combined) were significantly higher than those in normal water years (W2). Conclusion: In high water years when natural food shortage occurs, the Siberian Cranes can cope with the impact through increasing moving distance, enlarging home range and utilizing farmland more, to meet their energy need and improve their fitness. Nonetheless, the natural wetland is still the main foraging habitat and roosting habitat for Siberian Cranes wintering at Poyang Lake either in normal water years. In high water years, even the overall use of farmland in day time accounted for 50%, the natural wetland is still the main roosting habitat. The adaptive management of natural wetlands therefore should be strengthened in order to improve the function and resilience of wetlands as whole at Poyang Lake under different hydrological conditions and ensure the health and safety of 98% of global wintering population of Siberian Cranes.

Key words: Siberian Cranes, Poyang Lake, movement distance, home range, habitat use

中图分类号: