欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 78-88.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220109

•   • 上一篇    下一篇

西藏拉萨河中下游原生动物优势种时空生态位

张鹏,刘洋,安瑞志,乔楠茜,达珍,巴桑*   

  1. 西藏大学理学院 青藏高原湿地与流域生态系统实验室 拉萨 850000
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-03 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-03-08
  • 通讯作者: 巴桑
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(21667027);国家自然科学基金项目(31360509);西藏大学研究生高水平人才培养计划(2019-GSP-S049);2019年中央财政支持地方高校发展专项资金(藏财教指[2019]1号)

Spatio-Temporal Niche of Dominant Protozoa Species in the Midstream and Downstream

Peng Zhang,Yang Liu,Ruizhi An,Nanqian Qiao,Zhen Da,Sang Ba*   

  1. Laboratory of Wetland and Catchments Ecology in Tibetan Plateau, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Tibet University Lhasa 850000
  • Received:2021-02-03 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-03-08
  • Contact: Sang Ba

摘要:

目的: 探究拉萨河中下游原生动物优势种的时间、空间及时空生态位, 揭示原生动物优势种的资源利用状况及与水环境因子相互关系, 为进一步研究拉萨河中下游原生动物群落种间关系及环境适应性提供基础依据。方法: 根据拉萨河中下游水环境特征, 设置17个样点, 于2015年5、8月和2016年11月用孔径64 μm的浮游生物网采集水样153份。运用相关性分析、冗余分析和聚类分析等方法, 分析原生动物优势种更替率、生态位宽度、生态位重叠指数、生态响应速率, 研究原生动物优势种的生态位及与水环境因子的关系。结果: 拉萨河中下游共鉴定出原生动物197种, 隶属于2门5纲20目48科75属, 其中优势种5种, 隶属2门5属; 优势种时间生态位宽度值为0.378~0.695, 空间生态位宽度值为0.071~0.354, 时空生态位宽度值为0.027~0.246; 优势种时间、空间及时空生态位重叠均以低度重叠为主; 优势种时间生态响应速率之和为0.449, 空间生态响应速率之和为-6.972, 时空生态响应速率之和为-0.107; 冗余分析表明, 水环境因子中水温显著影响下游优势种分布, 溶解氧含量和总磷含量显著影响中游优势种分布。结论: 拉萨河中下游原生动物优势种存在季节和区域性差异, 生态位宽度较窄, 生态位重叠较低, 种间竞争压力较小; 原生动物优势种对水环境变化响应敏感, 其分布受水环境影响显著, 原生动物群落生态系统较为脆弱。

关键词: 拉萨河, 原生动物, 优势种, 生态位, 生态响应速率, 西藏

Abstract:

Objective: This study aims to explore the temporal niche, spatial niche and spatio-temporal niche of dominant species of protozoa in the midstream and downstream of Lhasa River, and reveal the resource utilization status of dominant protozoa species and the relationship with to environmental factors, which provide a basis for further study on the interspecific interaction of protozoa communities and the adaptive mechanisms of protozoan to environmental change. Method: According to the characteristics of water enviroment in the midstream and downstream of Lhasd River, a total of 153 water samples were collected with plankton nets (aperture: 64 μm) at the seventeen sites in the midstream and downstream of Lhasa River in May, August 2015 and November 2016. We analysed replacement rate, niche width, niche overlap, ecological response rate and studied the niche of dominant protozoan species and the relationship with environmental factors through correlation analysis, redundancy analysis, cluster analysis and other method. Result: A total of 197 species of protozoa were identified, belonging to 2 phyla, 5 classes, 20 orders, 48 families and 75 genera, among which there were 5 dominant species of protozoa belonging to 2 phyla and 5 genera. The temporal niche width of dominant species is 0.378-0.695, the spatial niche width is 0.071-0.354, and the spatio-temporal niche width is 0.027-0.246. The dominant species have mainly low overlap in temporal niche, spatial niche and spatio-temporal niche. The sum of temporal ecological response rate of dominant species was 0.449, the sum of spatial ecological response rate was -6.972 and the sum of spatial and temporal ecological response rate was -0.107. The redundancy analysis showed that the water temperature significantly affected the distribution of protozoa dominant species in the lower reaches, and dissolved oxygen and total phosphorus significantly affected the distribution of dominant species in the midstream of Lhasa River. Conclusion: There are seasonal and regional differences of dominant species of protozoa, that temporal, spatial and spatio-temporal niche width and niche overlap is low in midstream and downstream of Lhasa River. The dominant species of protozoa were sensitive to changes in the water environment, and their distribution is significantly effected by the water environment. The protozoan community ecosystem was relatively fragile.

Key words: Lhasa River, protozoa, dominant species, ecological niche, ecological response rate, Tibet

中图分类号: