欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (7): 185-193.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200719

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

鲁中丘陵山地干旱生境上11个树种的细根解剖特征与耐旱策略

刘洪凯1,陈旭1,张明忠2,王强3,王延平1,2,*   

  1. 1. 黄河下游森林培育国家林业和草原局重点实验室 泰安 271018
    2. 山东农业大学林学院 泰安 271018
    3. 山东省林业外资与工程项目管理站 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-10 出版日期:2020-07-25 发布日期:2020-08-11
  • 通讯作者: 王延平
  • 基金资助:
    欧洲投资银行贷款山东沿海防护林建设项目(SCSFP-KY-2);山东省农业科技资金林业科技创新项目(2019LY005)

Anatomical Characteristics of Fine Roots of 11 Tree Species in the Hilly Mountainous Areas in Central Shandong Province and Their Drought Resistance Strategies

Hongkai Liu1,Xu Chen1,Mingzhong Zhang2,Qiang Wang3,Yanping Wang1,2,*   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Silviculture of the Lower Yellow River Tai'an 271018
    2. Forestry College of Shandong Agricultural University Tai'an 271018
    3. Shandong Forestry Foreign Investment and Project Management Office Jinan 250014
  • Received:2018-12-10 Online:2020-07-25 Published:2020-08-11
  • Contact: Yanping Wang

摘要:

目的: 探讨干旱环境下不同树种细根解剖结构特征,以期揭示不同树种应对干旱胁迫的生态适应策略,为干旱瘠薄山地造林树种选择提供了理论依据。方法: 依托2011年在鲁中山地丘陵区建造的4 hm2固定样地,对该样地内11个造林树种的1~3级细根进行根序划分并制作石蜡切片,利用光学显微镜观察其剖面结构,测定细根的剖面直径、皮层厚度、维管柱直径、导管内径和导管密度等。采用单因素方差分析比较各树种1~3级细根解剖特征的差异显著性,综合树种解剖特征参数进行主成分分析并进行树种分组。结果: 各树种1~3级细根直径总体上随着根序的升高而增大;同根序细根直径、皮层厚度和维管柱直径在树种间差异显著(P < 0.05);皂荚的1~2级细根皮层厚度最大,海州常山和桑树皮层厚度最小;在3级细根中,黄栌的维管柱直径最大,苦楝的导管内径最大,黄连木的维管柱直径最小且导管内径最小,但导管密度最大;细根解剖特征的主成分分析表明,主成分1可以解释细根解剖特征变化的46.2%,代表细根吸收功能属性,主成分2解释了细根特征变化的38.02%,代表细根输导功能属性;主成分的PCA排序结果显示,11个树种按照细根解剖特征可划分为3组:根细、皮层薄、输导组织密集型(包括桑树、荆条、海州常山、黄连木、君迁子、连翘、花椒、金钟花8个树种),根细、皮层薄、输导组织疏松型(黄栌和苦楝),根粗、皮层厚、输导组织密集型(皂荚)。结论: 树木细根解剖结构在一定程度上体现了树种的耐旱策略。11个树种包括2种干旱适应策略:快速吸水和快速输水;有效觅水和快速输水。这2种适应策略在不同立地条件的生境中有各自优势,大多数树种是通过增强细根的吸水功能进而适应干旱立地环境。桑树、黄连木等快速吸水和快速输水型树种,更适应长期干旱但有季节性降水且土层较薄的生境;皂荚等有效觅水和快速输水型树种,更适应长期干旱但土层较厚的生境。细根解剖性状决定了树种适应干旱环境的生态策略,根内皮层厚度和维管组织导管特征是评价树种对干旱生境适应能力的重要参考指标。

关键词: 细根, 解剖结构, 干旱瘠薄山地, 耐旱策略, 生态适应

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the anatomical characteristics of fine roots of trees under drought environments, and to reveal the ecological strategies of trees adapted to drought stress. Method: Fine roots were sampled from eleven tree species in a 4 hm2 plot which was established in 2011 in the hilly mountainous areas in central parts of Shandong province. Anatomical structures (root diameter, cortex thickness, vascular cylinder (stele) diameter, vessel inner diameter, and the density of vessels) of 2 475 samples of roots from the first to the third order were measured via microscopy imaging system and paraffin sectioning. One-way ANOVA was conducted to compare differences in the anatomical characteristics among the tree species, and Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to group the tree species. Result: The diameter of fine roots of the 11 tree species increased with root orders in general. The diameter, cortex thickness, vascular cylinder (stele) diameter of the fine roots within the same root order was significantly different among species (P < 0.05). Gleditsia sinensis has the largest cortex thickness of the first and the second order roots whereas Clerodendrum trichotomum and Morus alba have the smallest. Cotinus coggygria has the largest stele diameter in the third order roots; Melia azedarach has the largest vessel inner diameter. Pistacia chinensis has the smallest stele diameter and vessel inner diameter; P. chinensis has the largest root vessel density. PCA analysis showed that the first component explained 46% of variation in fine root anatomical traits representing absorptive functions, and the second component summarized 38% of variation in fine root anatomical traits responsible for transportation. PCA analysis grouped the 11 tree species into three groups based on anatomical features of fine roots, with the first group possessing a smaller root diameter, thinner cortex and more compacted transportation tissues (including 8 tree species such as M. alba, P. chinensis), the second having a smaller root diameter and thinner cortex, but looser transportation tissue (including C. coggygria and M. azedarach), and the third group showing a larger root diameter, thicker cortex and more compacted transport tissue (only including G. sinensis). Conclusion: Anatomical structure of fine roots reflected their adaptation to arid habitats. The eleven species displayed two strategies to adapt to the drought conditions: one was fast uptake and rapid transportation of water, and another was efficient finding and rapid transportation of water. The two strategies have their own advantages in different soil conditions. Nine tree species showed their adaptation to drought via improving water absorptive capabilities. Some trees with fast water uptaking and rapid transportation, such as M. alba and P. chinensis, demonstrating more suitability for habitats with long-term drought, seasonal rainfall and thin soil layer. Some species with efficient water finding and rapid water transport, such as G. sinensis, are more suitable for the habitats with long-term drought and thick soil layer. The anatomical traits of fine roots determine the strategies of trees adapted to drought environment. The root cortex thickness and vessel properties in fine roots are important indicators of assessing the capability of trees adapting to dry soils, this would provide a theoretical basis for species selection for afforestation in arid infertile mountainous areas.

Key words: fine roots, anatomical structure, arid and infertile mountain area, drought tolerance strategies, ecological adaptation

中图分类号: