杨树不同种质花粉萌发和致敏蛋白的差异

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170207

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的] 研究6份杨树种质（36号杨、南杨、110杨、森海2号杨、小叶杨和钻天杨）成熟花粉的萌发特性以及致敏蛋白差异，为低致敏杨树品种选育及植物过敏性疾病控制等研究提供理论依据。[方法] 2015年3月，在北京、河北和河南采集6份不同杨树种质的花枝，经水培后收集花粉，采用液体培养法进行杨树花粉萌发试验，并通过双向电泳、实时荧光定量PCR等研究不同杨树种质的花粉致敏蛋白差异。[结果] 1）在6份杨树种质花粉中，36号杨、南杨和钻天杨花粉活力较高，其次为110杨和小叶杨，森海2号杨活力最差；24 h时花粉萌发率最大的种质是36号杨，高达74.42%（±2.36%），而三倍体森海2号杨花粉萌发率为0；钻天杨花粉管平均长度为456.00 μm（±2.05 μm），小叶杨花粉管最短，为276.44 μm（±11.08 μm），且不同种质的花粉萌发率和花粉管萌发长度差异极显著（P<0.01），表明不同种质的花粉活力存在很大差异。2）利用Imagemaster 2D platinum 6.0软件分析南杨、110杨、森海2号杨、小叶杨和钻天杨的2-DE图谱，共发现有408个蛋白点相匹配，以36号杨鉴定的28个潜在致敏蛋白为参照，在5份种质花粉中有6个致敏蛋白均缺失表达，南杨和森海2号杨花粉有21个致敏蛋白，110杨次之，有19个，而小叶杨和钻天杨的致敏蛋白数量最少，为18个。对其余22个致敏蛋白进行差异表达量分析发现，其中有12个致敏蛋白在5份杨树种质中均低于36号杨，其相对表达量范围为-3.99~-0.02，尤其是森海2号杨和小叶杨分别有10个和8个致敏蛋白表达量显著（P<0.05）或极显著（P<0.01）低于36号杨；南杨和钻天杨降低趋势最小。有3个致敏蛋白在5份种质中表达均高于36号杨，其中南杨最高，达到极显著水平（P<0.01），其次为钻天杨、森海2号杨和110杨、小叶杨。组间差异方差分析发现南杨和钻天杨的17个致敏蛋白表达量显著或极显著大于小叶杨和森海2号杨。3）qRT-PCR分析结果表明，9个致敏蛋白编码基因中有5个在南杨和钻天杨中表达量都较高，包括spots 12、51、200、216和161，其次是小叶杨，而森海2号杨和110杨均只有2个致敏基因表达高。[结论] 杨树不同种质间花粉活力、致敏蛋白数量以及表达量存在明显差异，可为今后杨树低致敏新品种选育提供重要的参考，但是成熟花粉致敏蛋白表达量的高低与其致敏性强弱的相关性还有待进一步深入研究。

关键词: 杨树, 成熟花粉, 致敏蛋白, 双向电泳, 实时荧光定量PCR

Abstract: [Objective] The characteristics of pollen germination and the differences of allergenic proteins among six poplar germplasms (Populus deltoides ‘2KEN8’, P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’, P. deltoides×P. maximowiczii ‘Eridano’, P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’, P. simonii and P. nigra var. italica) were studied to provide a theoretical basis and scientific evidence for breeding hypoallergenic poplar varieties and for the control of plant allergy.[Method] Pollen was collected from flower branches of six poplar germplasms collected from Beijing, Hebei and Henan in March 2015 for a period of hydroponic culture, pollen germination was studied by liquid culture method, and pollen allergenic proteins of different poplar germplasms was used by two-dimensional electrophoresis and real-time quantitative PCR.[Result] 1) The pollen viability of P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’, P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’ and P. nigra var. italica was higher, followed by P. simonii and P. deltoides×P. maximowiczii ‘Eridano’, however, the viability of P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’ was the worst; the largest pollen germination rate was in P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’, up to 74.42% (±2.36%), while the pollen germination of triploid P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’ was 0; the average length of pollen tube of P. nigra var. italica was 456 μm (±2.05 μm), the shortest was in P. simonii, 276.44 μm (±11.08 μm), and the difference of pollen germination rate and pollen tube length among different entities were highly significant (P<0.01), suggesting that the pollen viability was significantly different among different germplasms. 2) The 2-DE maps of P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’, P. deltoides×P. maximowiczii ‘Eridano’, P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’, P. simonii and P. nigra var. italica mature pollen were analyzed by Imagemaster 2D platinum 6.0, a total of 408 protein spots were matched. Based on the 28 potentially allergenic proteins of P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’ identified in our previous study, 6 allergenic proteins were missing expression in the other five entities; both P. nigra var. italica and P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’ had 21 allergenic proteins, P. deltoides×P. maximowiczii ‘Eridano’ had 19; while P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’ and P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’ had the least number of allergenic proteins, only 18. Morover, the analysis of difference expression indicated that 12 of the 22 remaining allergenic proteins were less expressed in the five entities than in P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’, the range of relative expression level was -3.99——0.02. The expression level of P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’ and P. simonii was the least, especially they had 10 and 8 allergenic proteins which were significantly or highly significant lower than that of P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’, respectively. The expression of 3 allergenic proteins in the 5 entities was higher than in P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’. The strongest expression was in P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’, significantly greater than in P. deltoides ‘2KEN8’, followed by P. nigra var. italica, P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’, P. deltoides×P. maximowiczii ‘Eridano’ and P. simonii. Variance analysis among groups suggested that the expression of 17 allergenic proteins of P. nigra var. italica and P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’ were significantly (P<0.05) or highly significantly (P<0.01) greater than that of P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’ and P. simonii. 3) qRT-PCR results showed that there were 5 of 9 allergenic proteins encoding genes highly expressed in P. nigra var. italica and P. deltoides ‘Nanyang’, including spot 12, 51, 200, 216 and 161, followed by P. simonii, while both of P. deltoides×P. maximowiczii ‘Eridano’ and P. deltoides×P. cathayana ‘Senhai 2’ had only 2 highly expressed allergenic protein coding genes.[Conclusion] The pollen viability, the number and expression levels of allergenic proteins were significantly different among the 6 germplasm entities, providing an important basis for future breeding of new poplar hypoallergenic varieties. However, further study is needed to understand the correlation between expression levels and allergenicity of the allergenic proteins of mature pollen.

Key words: Populus, mature pollen, allergenic protein, two-dimensional electrophoresis, real-time quantitative PCR

中图分类号:

S718.43

章小铃, 王留强, 孙佩, 吴立栓, 樊玮, 张进, 卢孟柱, 胡建军. 杨树不同种质花粉萌发和致敏蛋白的差异[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2): 54-64.

Zhang Xiaoling, Wang Liuqiang, Sun Pei, Wu Lishuan, Fan Wei, Zhang Jin, Lu Mengzhu, Hu Jianjun. Differences in Pollen Germination and Allergenic Proteins among Different Populus Germplasms[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(2): 54-64.

参考文献

曹媛,康向阳,张志毅,等. 2012.毛白杨花粉败育过程中Ca²⁺-ATPase的异常变化.北京林业大学学报,34(4):10-17.
(Cao Y,Kang X Y,Zhang Z Y,et al. 2012. Anomalous changes in Ca²⁺-ATPase distribution during the process of pollen abortion in Populus tomentosa Carr. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,34(4):10-17.[in Chinese])
陈绍宁,王伟,叶永忠. 2008. I型花粉致敏原的分子特性及其生物学功能.植物生理学通讯,44(2):341-344.
(Chen S N,Wang W,Ye Y Z. 2008. Molecular characteristics and biological function of group-1 pollen allergens. Plant Physiology Communications,44(2):341-344.[in Chinese])
胡超. 2011.欧美黑杨与小叶杨杂交后代性状分析及胚培养研究.武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文.
(Hu C. 2011. Researches on offspring's characters and embryo culture of hybrids between Populus euramericana and Populus simonii. Wuhan:MS thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University.[in Chinese])
贾会霞,姬慧娟,胡建军,等. 2015.杨树新品种的SSR指纹图谱构建和倍性检测.林业科学,51(2):70-79.
(Jia H X,Ji H J,Hu J J,et al. 2015. Fingerprints of SSR markers and ploidy detection for new Populus varieties. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,51(2):70-79.[in Chinese])
贾黎明,刘诗琦,祝令辉,等. 2013.我国杨树林的碳储量和碳密度.南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,37(2):1-7.
(Jia L M,Liu S Q,Zhu L H,et al. 2013. Carbon storage and density of poplars in China. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences,37(2):1-7.[in Chinese])
吕相征,刘秀梅,杨晓光. 2005.健康人群食物过敏状况的初步调查.中国食品卫生杂志,17(2):119-121.
(Lü X Z,Liu X M,Yang X G. 2005. Preliminary survey on status of food allergy in young Chinese students. Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene,17(2):119-121.[in Chinese])
辛嘉楠,欧阳志云,郑华,等. 2007.城市中的花粉致敏植物及其影响因素.生态学报,27(9):3820-3826.
(Xin J N,Ouyang Z Y,Zheng H,et al. 2007. Allergenic pollen plants and their influencing factors in urban area. Acta Ecologica Sinica,27(9):3820-3826.[in Chinese])
杨琼梁,欧阳婷,颜红,等. 2015.花粉过敏的研究进展.中国农学通报,31(24):163-164.
(Yang Q L, Ouyang T, Yan H, et al. 2015. Research progress of pollen allergy. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,31(2):163-164.[in Chinese])
杨诗勤. 2014.水稻减数分裂相关基因OsPHS1的转化与鉴定.武汉:湖北大学硕士学位论文.
(Yang S Q. 2014. Transformation and identification of OsPHS1 gene related to rice meiosis. Wuhan:MS thesis of Hubei University.[in Chinese])
赵丽娟. 2011.小黑杨(Populus simonii×P. nigra)花粉功能基因组和蛋白质组研究.哈尔滨:东北林业大学博士学位论文.
(Zhao L J. 2011. Functional genomics and proteomics of Populus simonii×P. nigra pollen. Harbin:PhD thesis of Northeast Forestry University.[in Chinese])
Asturias J,Ibarrola I,Bartolome B,et al. 2002. Purification and characterization of Pla a 1, a major allergen from Platanus acerifolia pollen. Allergy,57(3):221-227.
Bolhaar S T H P,van de Weg W E,van Ree R,et al. 2005. In vivo assessment with prick-to-prick testing and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge of allergenicity of apple cultivars. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 116(5):1080-1086.
Ebner C,Hirschwehr R,Bauer L,et al. 1995. Identification of allergens in fruits and vegetables:IgE cross-reactivities with the important birch pollen allergens Bet v 1 and Bet v 2(birch profilin). Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,95(5):962-969.
Erkara I P. 2008. Concentrations of airborne pollen grains in Sivrihisar(Eskisehir), Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,138(1-3):81-91.
Gallo M,Richard S. 2009. Removing allergens and reducing toxins from food crops. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 20(2):191-196.
Hirahara K,Tatsuta T,Takatori T,et al. 2001. Preclinical evaluation of an immunotherapeutic peptide comprising 7 T-cell determinants of Cry j 1 and Cry j 2, the major Japanese cedar pollen allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,108(1):94-100.
Ibarrola I,Arilla M,Martínez A,et al. 2004. Identification of a polygalacturonase as a major allergen(Pla a 2) from Platanus acerifolia pollen. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,113(6):1185-1191.
Kondo Y,Ipsen H,Løwenstein H,et al. 1997. Comparison of concentrations of Cry j 1 and Cry j 2 in diploid and triploid Japanese cedar(Cryptomeria japonica) pollen extracts. Allergy,52(4):455-459.
Larsen J N,Strøman P,Ipsen H. 1992. PCR based cloning and sequencing of isogenes encoding the tree pollen major allergen Car b I from Carpinus betulus, hornbeam. Molecular Immunology,29(6):703-711.
Lin R Y,Clauss A E,Bennett E S. 2002. Hypersensitivity to common tree pollens in New York City patients. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings,23(4):253-258.
Lombardero M,Obispo T,Calabozo B,et al. 2002. Cross-reactivity between olive and other species. Role of Ole e 1-related proteins. Allergy,57(s71):29-34.
Mardones P,Grau M,Araya J,et al. 2013. First annual register of allergenic pollen in Talca, Chile. Allergologia Et Immunopathologia,41(4):233-238.
Midoro H T,Goldblum R M,Kurosky A,et al. 1999. Isolation and characterization of the mountain cedar Juniperus ashei pollen major allergen, Jun a 1. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,104(3):608-612.
Pfaffl M W. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Research,29(9):45.
Quiralte J,Florido F,Arias J,et al. 2002. Olive allergen-specific IgE responses in patients with Olea europaea pollinosis. Allergy,57(s71):47-52.
Sicherer S H,Sampson H A. 2010. Food allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,125(2):116-125.
Son D Y,Scheurer S,Hoffmann A,et al. 1999. Pollen-related food allergy:cloning and immunological analysis of isoforms and mutants of Mal d 1, the major apple allergen, and Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen. European Journal of Nutrition,38(4):201-215.
Twardosz A,Hayek B,Seiberler S,et al. 1997. Molecular characterization, expression in Escherichia coli, and epitope analysis of a two EF-hand calcium-binding birch pollen allergen, Bet v 4. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,239(1):197-204.
Zhang J,Wu L S,Fan W,et al. 2015. Proteomic analysis and candidate allergenic proteins in Populus deltoides cl."2KEN8" mature pollen. Frontiers in Plant Science,6:1-22.
Zuidmeer L,van Leeuwen W A,Kleine B I,et al. 2006. Allergenicity assessment of apple cultivars:hurdles in quantifying labile fruit allergens. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology,41(3):230-240.

[1]	辛福梅, 闫小莉, 张长耀, 贾黎明. 西藏拉萨河谷区藏川杨和北京杨树干液流特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 22-32.
[2]	张扬, 杜琳, 唐贤丰, 刘唤唤, 周功克, 柴国华. 杨树BAG基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 138-145.
[3]	李建庆, 梅增霞, 杨忠岐. 不同林分杨树云斑天牛种群空间格局地统计学分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(3): 83-90.
[4]	黄绢, 陈存, 张伟溪, 丁昌俊, 苏晓华, 黄秦军. 干旱胁迫对转JERF36银中杨苗木叶片解剖结构及光合特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5): 8-15.
[5]	尹吴, 孙伟博, 周燕, 诸葛强. 毛果杨Rubisco活化酶基因的克隆与功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(4): 83-95.
[6]	李真, 王留强, 卢孟柱. 毛白杨PtoWOX11/12a对杨树扦插苗生长发育的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(11): 69-76.
[7]	储文渊, 王玉娇, 朱东悦, 陈竹, 严涵薇, 项艳. 盐和干旱胁迫下杨树新内参基因的筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(10): 70-79.
[8]	曹国玉, 李继祥, 买买提库尔班·阿力, 李开花, 胡建军. 杨树良种‘北杨’[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 156-156.
[9]	张利, 徐向东, 王丽娟, 卢孟柱. 杨树蔗糖转运体基因PagSUT4的鉴定及功能分析[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(8): 21-28.
[10]	刘文哲, 牛明月, 李秀云, 林二培, 黄华宏, 童再康. 光皮桦实时荧光定量PCR内参基因的筛选[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(8): 29-37.
[11]	黄绢, 李丹, 王宁宁, 苏晓华, 黄秦军. 不同配置方式杨树超短轮伐人工林光合特性及生长差异[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(8): 131-137.
[12]	陈盼飞, 任亚超, 张军, 王进茂, 杨敏生. 8年生嫁接转基因杨树Bt毒蛋白的表达与运输[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7): 46-52.
[13]	王文波, 王延平, 王华田, 马雪松, 伊文慧. 杨树人工林连作与轮作对土壤氮素细菌类群和氮素代谢的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5): 45-54.
[14]	李开花, 胡建军. 杨树良种‘创新杨’[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(3): 130-130.
[15]	杨蕾, 周国英, 梁军. 2种生防菌株对杨树溃疡病原葡萄座腔菌的抑制作用[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(8): 67-73.