欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (10): 153-160.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161019

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

3种植物源引诱剂对鞘翅目甲虫引诱效果比较

刘璇1, 胡春祥1, 曹传旺1, Troy Kimoto2   

  1. 1. 东北林业大学林学院 哈尔滨 150040;
    2. 加拿大食品检验局 温哥华 V5C6S7
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-02 修回日期:2015-06-24 出版日期:2016-10-25 发布日期:2016-11-09
  • 通讯作者: 胡春祥
  • 基金资助:
    国家林业局公益项目“利用林下有毒植物和病原微生物开发生物农药技术研究”(201104069);加拿大合作项目“北美与中国树种健康调查”。

Comparative Study on Trapping Effects of Three Botanical Attractants to Coleopterous Beetle

Liu Xuan1, Hu Chunxiang1, Cao Chuanwang1, Troy Kimoto2   

  1. 1. College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University Harbin 150040;
    2. Canadian Food Inspection Agency Vancouver V5C6S7
  • Received:2015-02-02 Revised:2015-06-24 Online:2016-10-25 Published:2016-11-09

摘要: [目的] 比较3种植物源引诱剂对鞘翅目甲虫在2种林型中的引诱效果,以期筛选出高效引诱剂防治甲虫的危害。[方法] 选择天然次生林(老山实验站样地)和人工纯林(林场样地)使用Lindgren漏斗诱捕器进行3种植物源引诱剂的林间诱捕试验,统计2种样地诱捕甲虫的数量、种类,比较不同林型不同样地间诱捕效果,分析环境条件对鞘翅目甲虫引诱和诱捕器释放量的影响。[结果] 1)3种植物源引诱剂UHR,COB和LAP对鞘翅目甲虫均具有引诱作用,捕获的3 215号鞘翅目昆虫隶属于55科120属,其中小蠹科占48.93%,为优势鞘翅目类群。3种引诱剂诱捕效果依次为UHR > COB > LAP,其中UHR引诱剂引诱个体数占74.21%,小蠹科个体数占48.65%,优势种为北方材小蠹和锉小蠹。2)UHR引诱剂对于小蠹科、叩甲科、郭公虫科和埋葬甲科的引诱效果显著高于COB和LAP引诱剂。COB引诱剂在两样地中捕获隐翅虫科数量最高。然而3种引诱剂对象甲科和天牛科的诱捕差异性不显著。防治时,应针对不同种类甲虫选择不同种类引诱剂,能达到更佳引诱效果。3)2种林型诱捕效果综合比较,老山实验站样地>林场样地,表明植被类型及自然条件对昆虫种群多样性具有直接影响。埋葬甲科仅在老山实验站样地捕获,这与该科昆虫的生活习性和样地环境相关。[结论] UHR引诱剂对鞘翅目小蠹科昆虫具有较强的引诱作用,可进一步开发应用于林间小蠹虫的监测和防治,为小蠹虫的无公害防治提供了1种新方法。

关键词: 诱捕效果, 鞘翅目, 小蠹虫, 植物源引诱剂, 引诱剂

Abstract: [Objective] Semiochemicals have the advantages such as less environmental pollution, less easy to produce drug resistance and easy to use in monitoring and controlling insect pests, which is a hot study spot in pest control field. In this study, we compared the lure effects of three botanical attractants to beetles in two forest types in order to screen effective lures for controlling various coleopterous beetles. [Method] The attractant traps were placed in a natural secondary forest (Laoshan station) and an artificial pure forest (Northeast Forestry University Forest Farm) to compare the trapping effects of the three attractants by Lindgren funnel traps. Luring effect was compared in different locations to confirm influence under different environmental factors. [Result] 1) The three botanical attractants, UHR, COB, and LAP, had different lures on beetles and trapped 3 215 coleopterous beetles belonging to 55 families and 120 genera. Among these beetles, the insects of Scolytidae were 48.93% of the total coleopterous beetles and were dominant beetles. The trap effects of three botanical attractants were in the order of UHR > COB > LAP. The UHR attractant trapped 74.21% of total attractive beetle individuals, and the Scolytidae individuals were 48.65% of these trapped beetles. The dominant species were Xyleborus dispar and Scolytoplatypus sp. in Scolytidae. 2) The UHR attractant had stronger lure to Scolytidae, Elateridae, Cleridae, Silphidae than COB and LAP attractants, while the COB attractant had stronger lure to Staphylinidae. However, there was no significant difference of the three attractants in attractive effect to Cerambycidae and Curculionidae. 3) The attractants had stronger trap effects in Laoshan station than in Northeast Forestry University Forest Farm, indicating that the chemical attractants had different efficiency in different geographical areas. Silphidae was only trapped in Laoshan station, which might be related to living habit and environment. [Conclusion] Thus, the UHR attractant have stronger lure to Scolytidae beetles and could be further developed for monitoring and controlling Scolytidae beetles in forests. This study also provides a new method for the nuisanceless prevention.

Key words: trap effect, coleopterous beetles, Scolytidae, botanical attractant, attractants

中图分类号: