欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (3): 13-24.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250330

• 前沿热点 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河上游宁蒙段岸线控沙技术集成研究:风沙入黄规律及重点危害区域

刘欣瑶1,王思涵2,于子捷1,崔桂鹏1,3,时忠杰1,吴波1,3,熊伟1,*()   

  1. 1. 中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所 北京?100091
    2. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院 呼和浩特?010019
    3. 三北工程研究院 北京?100091
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-21 修回日期:2025-08-21 出版日期:2026-03-15 发布日期:2026-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 熊伟 E-mail:xwcaf@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(CAFYBB2024ZA011, CAFYBB2023ZA008)。

Integrated Research on Sediment Control Technologies for the Riverside of the Ning-Meng Reach in the Upper Yellow River: Patterns of Aeolian Sand Input into the Yellow River and Key Hazard Areas

Xinyao Liu1,Sihan Wang2,Zijie Yu1,Guipeng Cui1,3,Zhongjie Shi1,Bo Wu1,3,Wei Xiong1,*()   

  1. 1. Institute of Ecological Conservation and Restoration, Chinese Academy of Forestry Beijing?100091
    2. College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University Hohhot?010019
    3. Institute of Great Green Wall Beijing?100091
  • Received:2025-05-21 Revised:2025-08-21 Online:2026-03-15 Published:2026-03-12
  • Contact: Wei Xiong E-mail:xwcaf@163.com

摘要:

目的: 聚焦黄河上游核心沙源区,分析宁蒙段入黄泥沙的来源与路径、入黄沙量时空特征,精准识别入黄风沙危害的重点区域,加深对宁蒙段风沙入黄规律及其危害区域的认识,为沿岸防沙治沙和生态修复实践提供科学依据。方法: 以腾格里沙漠、乌兰布和沙漠、库布齐沙漠为研究对象,综合运用实地调查、遥感解译与多源数据整合等方法,系统分析三大沙漠风沙入黄规律,并确定重点危害区域。结果: 1) 腾格里沙漠、乌兰布和沙漠、库布齐沙漠等近源沙漠沙及其下伏砒砂岩是宁蒙段河道粗泥沙的主要来源,其主要通过风力侵蚀、沙丘移动、悬移沉降和洪水带入4种方式进入河道。2) 以头道拐水文站为出口站,1950—2023年宁蒙段输沙量为1.630×107~3.162 1×108 t,多年平均值为9.405×107 t。M-K检验表明,1950—2023年宁蒙段输沙量呈显著减少趋势(P<0.01),下降速率为1.80×106 t·a?1。3) 从年际变化来看,1986—2013年宁蒙段入黄沙量呈逐渐下降趋势。从季节变化来看,乌兰布和沙漠入黄沙量呈现以春季为主的变化特征,春季、夏季、秋季和冬季的贡献率分别为46.8%、24.7%、21%和7.5%。4) 三大沙漠入黄沙量表现出显著空间差异。乌兰布和沙漠年均入黄沙量最大,为9.369 7×106 t;库布齐沙漠年均入黄沙量次之,为6.534 2×106 t;腾格里沙漠年均入黄沙量最小,仅为7.649×105 t。结论: 黄河上游宁蒙段入黄沙量具有显著的时空异质性,总体呈现出春季主导、年际递减的时间特征,空间上表现为乌兰布和沙漠>库布齐沙漠>腾格里沙漠的入黄沙量格局。本研究结果可为黄河上游宁蒙段沿岸风沙危害区的防沙治沙与生态修复提供科学依据,对保障黄河流域生态安全具有重要实践价值。

关键词: 宁蒙段, 风沙入黄, 时空特征, 输沙量, 黄河上游

Abstract:

Objective: The Ning-Meng reach of the upper Yellow River is a major source of sediment input, posing urgent ecological threats such as the formation of a “new suspended river” and ice-flood-induced breaches. This study aims to analyze the mechanisms and spatiotemporal patterns of sediment transport into the river in this region, and identify key hazard areas along the main channel, so as to provide scientific support for the implementation of the “Yellow River Bend” campaign under the Three-North Shelterbelt Forest Program. Method: This study focused on the Tengger Desert, Ulan Buh Desert, and Kubuqi Desert. The methods of field surveys, remote sensing interpretation, and multi-source data integration were comprehensively applied to systematically analyze the patterns of aeolian sand input into the Yellow River from these three deserts and identify the affected areas. Result: 1)Aeolian sand from the proximal deserts such as the Tengger, Ulan Buh, and Kubuqi Deserts and the underlying soft sandstone formations were the primary source of coarse sediment in the Ning-Meng reach of the Yellow River. This sediment entered the channel mainly through four processes: wind erosion, dune migration, suspension and deposition, and transport by flood events. 2)With the Toudaoguai hydrological station as the basin outlet, the sediment transport in the Ning-Meng reach from 1950 to 2023 ranged from 1.630×107 t to 3.162 1×108 t, with an average of 9.405×107 t. The Mann-Kendall test showed a significant decreasing trend in sediment transport (P<0.01) at a rate of 1.80×106 t·a?1 during this period. 3)The amount of sediment input into the river in the Ning-Meng reach showed a gradual downward trend from 1986 to 2013. From a seasonal perspective, the sediment input from the Ulan Buh Desert was dominated by spring, with contributions of 46.8%, 24.7%, 21%, and 7.5% in spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. 4)There were significant spatial differences in sediment input from the three deserts. The Ulan Buh Desert had the largest annual average input at 9.369 7×106 t, followed by the Kubuqi Desert at 6.534 2×106 t, and the Tengger Desert the smallest at only 7.649×105 t. Conclusion: The sediment input into the Yellow River in Ning-Meng reach exhibits significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity: it predominantly occurs in the spring and shows an annual decline over time. In space, it forms a gradient pattern of sediment input into the Yellow River with Ulan Buh Desert>Kubuqi Desert>Tengger Desert. This study provides a scientific basis for desertification prevention and ecological restoration in the sandy hazard areas along the Ning-Meng reach of the Yellow River, which holds practical significance for ensuring the stability of the Yellow River and the ecological security of the basin.

Key words: Ning-Meng reach, wind sand into yellow, spatiotemporal characteristics, sediment transport, upper Yellow River

中图分类号: