杉木生态公益林林分空间结构分析及评价

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150705

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

[目的] 分析杉木生态公益林林分空间结构并对其进行评价,为杉木生态公益林空间结构优化措施的制定和其他生态公益林纯林空间结构优化调整措施的制定奠定理论基础。[方法] 基于福寿林场不同龄组杉木生态公益林(幼龄林、中龄林、近熟林)18个固定样地的实测数据和9个固定样地的复测数据,采用Voronoi图确定林木的空间结构单元,进而用混交度、大小比数、角尺度、竞争指数、林层指数和开敞度6个林分空间结构参数分析3个龄组杉木生态公益林间伐补植前后的林分空间结构特征,采用乘除法对各个空间结构参数进行多目标规划,提出林分空间结构评价指数,并参考人工林近自然化改造的目标和技术指标,采用定性和定量相结合的方法,将林分空间结构评价指数值划分为5个评价等级。[结果] 3个龄组杉木生态公益林间伐补植前的混交度和林层指数都偏低,林分混交程度低,稳定性差,垂直空间结构较差,林木对垂直方向的空间利用不足; 大小比数都接近中庸状态,林木个体差异不大,林木分化不严重; 角尺度为均匀分布和随机分布的中间状态,不是理想的水平分布格局; 幼龄林开敞度较大,林木生长空间充足,中龄林和近熟林开敞度较小,林木生长空间不足; 随着杉木的生长发育,竞争指数呈现出逐渐增加的趋势,说明杉木年龄的增加使林木个体所承受的竞争压力越来越大。18个固定样地杉木生态公益林林分空间结构评价指数为0.185 9~0.364 7,评价等级属于1级的样地占样地总数的11%,属于2级的样地占样地总数的89%,分属3,4,5级的样地没有,这说明杉木生态公益林的空间结构距理想状态差距还很大,需要进行林分空间结构优化。间伐补植后3个龄组杉木生态公益林的林层指数和混交度得到明显提高,林木个体差异变大,中、幼龄林的生长空间更加充足,9个复测样地杉木生态公益林林分空间结构评价指数为0.346 2~0.613 1,评价等级属于2级的样地占样地总数的11%,属于3级的样地占样地总数的78%,属于4级的样地占样地总数的11%,这说明通过间伐补植林分空间结构得到了明显改善。[结论] 分析林分空间结构,能够发现林分空间结构中存在的不合理性,从而为优化空间结构经营措施提供依据。林分空间结构评价指数的提出可为杉木生态公益林的理想空间结构及其表达探索一条新途径,可为改造以杉木为主的人工生态公益林向理想结构演变提供理论依据,从对研究区杉木生态公益林林分空间结构的评价结果来看,可较客观地反映杉木生态公益林间伐补植前后林分空间结构的实际现状。

关键词: 杉木, 生态公益林, 空间结构, 林分空间结构评价指数

Abstract:

[Objective] The aim of this study is to provide the theoretical basis for optimizing the stand spatial structure and for developing its ecological, economic and cultural functions by analyzing and evaluating the stand spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest.[Method] Neighbor trees of the object one was determined based on the Voronoi diagram, and Stand spatial structure index was calculated based on the measured data in eighteen permanent sample plots and the retest data in nine permanent sample plots of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest of different age groups(young, half-mature and near mature)in Fushou Forest Farm of Hunan province. Mingling index, neighborhood comparison, uniform angle index, competition index, stand layer index and open degree of stand were selected to analyze their spatial structure characteristics before and after thinning and replanting. Meanwhile, adopted multiplication division method making a multi-objective programming for each spatial structure parameter, the evaluation index of stand spatial structure was put forward. Making reference to target and technical index of near-natural transformation of plantation and using the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods, the evaluation index values of stand spatial structure were divided into five grades.[Result] Before thinning and replanting, stand layer index and mingling index was generally low, indicating that mingling degree of tree species was low, the stability of the stand vertical space structure was weak, and the use of vertical space of trees was underutilized. Also, neighborhood comparison of DBH of the stands was closed to moderate state, the numbers of trees in diameter classes were distributed uniformly, and there was minor difference between individual trees, uniform angle index of the stands was belonging to the intermediate state of uniform and random distribution, which was not ideal horizontal distribution pattern of the stands. The open degree of young forest was high, but that of half-mature and near mature forest was low, indicating that growth space of young forest was sufficient, but half-mature and near mature was lack of growth space. As Cunninghamia lanceolata grown and developed, the competition index of stands showed an increasing trend,indicating that the competition pressure among individual trees was gradually increasing with the growth of tree age. The evaluation index of stand spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest of eighteen permanent sample plots was 0.185 9-0.364 7, belonging to the evaluation grade 1 and 2 accounting for 11% and 89% of the total sample plots respectively, without the sample plots belonging to the grade 3, 4 and 5, illustrating that the spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest was far from ideal spatial structure, and need to optimize the stand spatial structure. However, after thinning and replanting, the stand layer index and mingling index were increased significantly, the degree of difference among individual trees became apparent, and the growth space of juvenile and medium became more sufficient. The evaluation index of the stand spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest of nine retest sample plots was 0.346 2-0.613 1, belonging to level 2, 3 and 4 of evaluation grade accounting for 11%, 78% and 11% of the total retest sample plots respectively, which illustrated that the spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest of different age groups was improved obviously.[Conclusion] There were unreasonable factors in the stand spatial structure characteristics could be found by analyzing the stand spatial structure, which provided basis for management measures to optimize the spatial structure. The evaluation index of stand spatial structure was put forward, it explored a new approach to the ideal spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest and provided the theoretical basis for the evolution of the ecological forest improving mainly Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation toward ideal structure. According to the evaluation results of spatial structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological forest in the research area, it was objectively reflected the actual situation of its spatial structure before and after thinning and replanting.

Key words: Cunninghamia lanceolata, ecological forest, spatial structure, evaluation index of the stand spatial structure

中图分类号:

S757

曹小玉, 李际平, 封尧, 胡园杰, 张彩彩, 房晓娜, 邓超. 杉木生态公益林林分空间结构分析及评价[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(7): 37-48.

Cao Xiaoyu, Li Jiping, Feng Yao, Hu Yuanjie, Zhang Caicai, Fang Xiaona, Deng Chao. Analysis and Evaluation of the Stand Spatial Structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata Ecological Forest[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(7): 37-48.

参考文献

安慧君.2003.阔叶红松林空间结构研究.北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文.(An H J.2003.Study on the spatial structure of thebroad-leaved Korean pine forest.Beijing:PhD thesis of Beijing Forestry University.[in Chinese])
侯元兆,曾祥谓.2010.论多功能森林.世界林业研究,23(3): 7-12.(Hou Y Z,Zeng X W.2010.Discussion on multifunctional forest. World Forestry Research,23(3): 7-12.[in Chinese])
胡艳波,惠刚盈.2006.优化林分空间结构的森林经营方法探讨.林业科学研究, 19(1): 1-8.(Hu Y B,Hui G Y.2006. A discussion on forest management method optimizing forest spatial structure. Forest Research, 19(1): 1-8.[in Chinese])
胡艳波.2010.基于结构化森林经营的天然异龄林空间优化经营模型研究. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院博士学位论文.(Hu Y B.2010. Structure-based spatial optimization management model for natural uneven-aged forest.Beijing:PhD thesis of Chinese Academy of Forestry.[in Chinese])
惠刚盈,胡艳波.2001.混交林树种空间隔离程度表达方式的研究.林业科学研究,14(1): 23-27.(Hui G Y,Hu Y B. 2001.Measuring species spatial isolation in mixed forest. Forest Research,14(1): 23-27.[in Chinese])
惠刚盈,克劳斯·冯佳多,胡艳波,等.2007a.结构化森林经营.北京: 中国林业出版社.(Hui G Y, Gadow K,Hu Y B,et al. 2007a. Structure-based forest management. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House.[in Chinese])
惠刚盈,李丽,赵中华,等.2007b.林木空间分布格局分析方法.生态学报, 27(11): 4717-4728.(Hui G Y,Li L,Zhao Z H,et al. 2007b. The comparison of methods in analysis of the tree spatial distribution pattern. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(11): 4717-4728.[in Chinese])
惠刚盈,Gadow K,Albert M.1999.角尺度——一个描述林木个体分布格局的结构参数.林业科学,35(1): 37-42.(Hui G Y,Gadow K,Albert M.1999. The neighbourhood pattern:a new structure parameter for describing distribution of forest tree position.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,35(1): 37-42.[in Chinese])
惠刚盈,Gadow K,胡艳波.2004.林分空间结构参数角尺度的标准角的选择.林业科学研究,17(6): 687-692.(Hui G Y,Gadow K,Hu Y B,et al. 2004. The optimum standard angle of the uniform angle index.Forest Research,17(6): 687-692.[in Chinese])
惠刚盈,胡艳波,赵中华,等.2013.基于交角的林木竞争指数.林业科学,49(6): 68-73.(Hui G Y,Hu Y B,Zhao Z H,et al. 2013. A forest competition index based on intersection angle.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,49(6): 68-73.[in Chinese])
雷加富,刘红,王恩玲,等.2001.生态公益林建设导则(GB/T 18337.1—2001).北京: 中国标准出版社.(Lei J F,L H,Wang E L,et al. 2001. Guide principle for non-commercial forest construction(GB/T 18337.1—2001).Beijing: Standards Press of China.[in Chinese])
李建军,李际平,刘素青,等.2010.红树林空间结构均质性指数.林业科学,46(6): 6-14.(Li J J,Li J P,Liu S Q,et al.2010. Homogeneity index of stand spatial structure of mangrove ecological system.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,46(6): 6-14.(in Chinese)
李建军,张会儒,王传立,等.2012.水源涵养林多功能经营结构优化模型初探.中南林业科技大学学报,32(3): 23-28.(Li J J,Zhang H R,Wang C L,et al. 2012. Discussion on spatial optimization modeling of water resource conservation forests and management practice of forest functions. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,32(3): 23-28.(in Chinese)
李明辉,何风华,刘云,等.2003.林分空间格局的研究方法.生态科学,22(1): 77-81.(Li M H,He F H,Liu Y,et al.2003. Analysis methods of stand spatial distribution pattern.Ecologic Science,22(1): 77-81.(in Chinese)
陆元昌.2006.近自然经营的理论与实践.北京: 科学出版社.(Lu Y C. 2006. The theory and practice of close to nature management.Beijing: Science Press.[in Chinese])
吕勇,臧颢,万献军,等. 2012.基于林层指数的青椆混交林林层结构研究.林业资源管理,(3): 81-84.(Lü Y,Zang H,Wan X J,et al.2012. Storey structure study of Cyclobalanopsis myrsinaefolia mixed stand based on storey index.Forest Resources Managment,(3): 81-84.[in Chinese])
钱颂迪.1990.运筹学.北京:清华大学出版社.(Qian S D.1990.Operations research.Beijing:Tsinghua University Press.[in Chinese])
汤孟平,周国模,陈永刚,等.2009.基于Voronoi图的天目山常绿阔叶林混交度.林业科学, 45(6): 1-5.(Tang M P,Zhou G M,Chen Y G,et al. 2009. Mingling of evergreen broad-leaved forests in Tianmu Mountain based on Voronoi diagram. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,45(6): 1-5.[in Chinese])
汤孟平,陈永刚,施拥军,等.2007.基于Voronoi图的群落优势树种种内种间竞争.生态学报,27(11): 4707-4716.(Tang M P,Chen Y G,Shi Y J,et al.2007. Intraspecific and Interspecific competition analysis of community dominant plant populations based on Voronoi diagram. Acta Ecologica Sinica,27(11): 4707-4716.[in Chinese])
汤孟平.2003.森林空间结构分析与优化经营模型研究.北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文.(Tang M P.2003.Study on forest spatial structure analysis and optimal management model.Beijing:PhD thesis of Beijing Forestry University.[in Chinese])
汤孟平,唐守正,雷相东,等.2004.林分择伐空间结构优化模型研究.林业科学,40(5): 25-31.(Tang M P,Tang S Z,Lei X D,et al.2004. Study on spatial structure optimizing model of stand selection cutting.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,40(5): 25-31.[in Chinese])
汤孟平,娄明华,陈永刚,等.2012.不同混交度指数的比较分析.林业科学,48(8): 46-53.(Tang M P,Lou M H,Chen Y G,et al. 2012. Comparative analyses on different mingling indices.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,48(8): 46-53.[in Chinese])
汪平,贾黎明,魏松坡,等.2013.基于Voronoi图的侧柏游憩林空间结构分析.北京林业大学学报,35(2): 39-44.(Wang P,Jia L M,Wei S P,et al. 2013. Analysis of stand spatial structure of Platycladus orientalis recreational forest based on Voronoi diagram method.Journal of Beijing Forestry University,35(2): 39-44.[in Chinese])
王彦辉,陆元昌,李智勇.2010.中国多功能林业发展道路探索.北京: 中国林业出版社
(Wang Y H,Lu Y C,Li Z Y. 2010.Exploration of multi-function forestry developing road in China.Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House.[in Chinese])
张会儒,唐守正.2007.森林生态采伐研究简述.林业科学,43(9): 83-87.(Zhang H R,Tang S Z.2007.Review on the study of ecology-based forest harvesting. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,43(9): 83-87.[in Chinese])
曾群英,周元满,李际平,等.2010.基于生态系统经营的林分采伐决策方法.东北林业大学学报,38(9): 31-35.(Zeng Q Y,Zhou Y M,Li J P,et al.2010. Decision-making methodology of forest ecosystem management based on spatial structure factors of forest.Journal of Northeast Forestry University,38(9): 31-35.[in Chinese])
赵春燕,李际平,李建军.2010.基于Voronoi图和Delaunay三角网的林分空间结构量化分析.林业科学,46(6): 78-84.(Zhao C Y,Li J P,Li J J.2010. Quantitative analysis of forest stand spatial structure based on Voronoi diagram & Delaunay triangulated network.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,46(6): 78-84.[in Chinese])
周红敏,惠刚盈,赵中华,等.2009.林分空间结构分析中样地边界木的处理方法.林业科学,45(2): 1-5.(Zhou H M,Hui G Y,Zhao Z H,et al. 2009. Treatment methods of plot boundary trees in spatial forest structure analysis.Scientia Silvae Sinicae,45(2): 1-5.[in Chinese])
Barrett T M,Gilless J K,Davis L S.1998.Economic and fragmentation effects of clear cut restrictions. Forest Science,44(4): 569-577.
Bettinger P,Boston K,Sessions J.1999.Combinatorial optimization of elk habitat effectiveness and timber harvest volume. Environment Modeling and Assessment,4(2/3): 143-153.
Murray A T,Snyder S.2000.Spatial modeling in forest management and natural resource planning.Forest Science,46(2): 153-156.
Pommerening A.2006.Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. Forest Ecology and Management,224(3): 266-277.

[1]	鞠园华, 马祥庆, 郭林飞, 马远帆, 蔡奇均, 郭福涛. 杉木枯落物燃烧释放污染物特征及PM_2.5成分分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(7): 187-196.
[2]	王超群, 焦如珍, 董玉红, 厚凌宇, 赵京京, 赵世荣. 不同林龄杉木人工林土壤微生物群落代谢功能差异[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(5): 36-45.
[3]	尹淑艳, 李波, 周成刚, 张卫光, 谢丽霞, 刘永杰. 基于28S rDNA分析板栗和杉木上针叶小爪螨物种分化原因[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(4): 122-128.
[4]	徐雪蕾, 孙玉军, 周华, 张鹏, 胡杨, 王新杰. 间伐强度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3): 1-12.
[5]	张雄清, 王翰琛, 鲁乐乐, 陈传松, 段爱国, 张建国. 杉木单木枯损率与初植密度、竞争和气候因子的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3): 72-78.
[6]	杨安娜, 陆云峰, 张俊红, 吴家森, 徐金良, 童再康. 杉木人工林土壤养分及酸杆菌群落结构变化[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(1): 119-127.
[7]	周伟, 王文杰, 何兴元, 张波, 肖路, 王琼, 吕海亮, 魏晨辉. 哈尔滨城市绿地土壤肥力及其空间特征[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9): 9-17.
[8]	魏明科, 俞金健, 黄晓龙, 刘琼瑶, 黄华宏, 林二培, 童再康. 杉木NAC转录因子基因ClNAC1的克隆、表达及单核苷酸多态性分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(9): 49-59.
[9]	于姣妲, 夏丽丹, 殷丹阳, 周垂帆. 磷素对杉木幼苗耐铝性的影响机制[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(5): 36-47.
[10]	唐佳妮, 林二培, 黄华宏, 童再康, 楼雄珍. 杉木叶片原生质体分离及RNA提取体系的建立[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(4): 38-48.
[11]	赵嘉诚, 李海奎. 杉木单木和林分水平地下生物量模型的构建[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(2): 81-89.
[12]	谭念, 王学顺, 黄安民, 王晨. 基于灰狼算法SVM的NIR杉木密度预测[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12): 137-141.
[13]	李海奎, 欧强新, 赵嘉诚, 杨英, 全锋. 模型和林分因子对区域尺度碳计量参数的影响——以杉木为例[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(9): 55-62.
[14]	詹天翼, 吕建雄, 张海洋, 蒋佳荔, 彭辉, 常建民. 水分解吸过程中杉木黏弹行为的经时变化规律及其频率依存性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(8): 155-162.
[15]	贺同鑫, 孙建飞, 李艳鹏, 俞有志, 胡宝清, 王清奎. 环割对杉木和马尾松人工林土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(6): 77-84.