欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (11): 151-158.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20201116

• 论文与研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同干燥方法对人工林樟子松木材干燥特性的影响

沈玉林1,2,王哲1,平立娟1,3,李美玲1,刘小燕1,王喜明1,*   

  1. 1. 内蒙古农业大学材料科学与艺术设计学院 呼和浩特 010010
    2. 北京林业大学材料科学与技术学院 北京 100083
    3. 中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 北京 100091
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-05 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-12-30
  • 通讯作者: 王喜明
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0600701);国家自然科学基金项目(21467021);内蒙古自治区科技创新团队(202044);内蒙古草原英才创新团队(108061)

Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Drying Characteristics of Plantation-Grown Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica

Yulin Shen1,2,Zhe Wang1,Lijuan Ping1,3,Meiling Li1,Xiaoyan Liu1,Ximing Wang1,*   

  1. 1. College of Materials Science and Art Design, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University Hohhot 010010
    2. College of Materials Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University Beijing 100083
    3. Research Institute of Wood Industry, CAF Beijing 100091
  • Received:2018-09-05 Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-30
  • Contact: Ximing Wang

摘要:

目的: 研究不同干燥方法对人工林樟子松木材干燥特性的影响,为人工林樟子松木材高温节能绿色干燥提供理论基础。方法: 采用常规干燥(结合百度试验法测试的干燥特性,参照LY/T 1068—2012《锯材窑干工艺规程》并加以修正后制定)、高温干燥、太阳能-常规联合干燥和太阳能-高温联合干燥4种方法对人工林樟子松木材进行干燥,比较干燥速度、干燥时间、干燥质量和干燥能耗等干燥质量指标。结果: 干燥方法不同,木材干燥特性差异较大。百度试验法得出人工林樟子松木材的综合干燥特性等级为一级。采用太阳能预干燥,木材含水率从约80%降至约30%,干燥时间约78 h,白天干燥速度约1.07%·h-1,夜间干燥速度约0.36%·h-1;采用高温干燥和常规干燥,干燥初中期,高温干燥速度比常规干燥高136.15%和113.30%,干燥后期,仅高20.87%左右。太阳能与常规、高温联合干燥时间分别为92和86 h,约为常规和高温干燥的3~5倍;常规干燥后木材干燥质量等级为一级,高温干燥后木材干燥质量等级为二级,太阳能与常规、高温联合干燥后木材干燥质量为三级;高温干燥后木材材色变化严重,呈暗黄/深黄色;高温干燥较常规干燥节能48.53%,太阳能-常规联合干燥较常规干燥节能40.09%,较高温干燥节能17.08%,太阳能-高温联合干燥较常规干燥节能68.76%,较高温干燥节能57.76%。结论: 人工林樟子松木材采用高温干燥具有良好的干燥效果,在保证干燥质量的前提下效率明显提高。太阳能预干燥可节约大量能耗,太阳能-高温联合干燥可实现高效、绿色干燥。

关键词: 人工林樟子松, 高温干燥, 太阳能干燥, 联合干燥, 干燥特性, 能耗评价

Abstract:

Objective: This current study was carried out to investigate the effects of different drying method on drying characteristics with the aim to provide theoretical bases for the high temperature energy-saving and green drying of plantation-grown Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica. Method: Four drying methods including conventional drying, high temperature drying, solar-conventional joint drying and solar-high temperature joint drying were used to study the drying characteristics of P. sylvestris var. mongolica focusing on drying time, drying rate, drying quality, drying energy consumption, etc. Result: The results showed that the drying characteristics of wood varied greatly with different drying methods. 100 ℃ showed that the comprehensive drying characteristics of P. sylvestris var. mongolica were grade 1. Moisture content of solar energy pre-drying wood was reduced from 80% to 30%, drying time was about 78 h, daytime drying speed was about 1.07%·h-1, night drying speed was about 0.36%·h-1. In the early and middle stages of drying, the drying speed of high temperature drying was higher than that of conventional drying by 136.15% and 113.30%, respectively, and only about 20.87% higher in the latter stage drying. The time of solar-conventional and solar-high temperature joint drying were 92 h and 86 h, respectively, which was about 3-5 times of conventional and high temperature drying. The wood drying quality after conventional drying was grade 1, and after high temperature drying was grade 2. The wood drying quality after solar energy joint drying was grade 3. High temperature drying made the wood color changed severely, turning dark yellow/dark yellow. Compared with conventional drying, high temperature drying could save 48.53% energy. Compared with conventional drying and high temperature drying, solar-conventional joint drying could save 40.09% and 17.08% energy, solar-high temperature joint drying could save 68.76% and 57.76% energy. Conclusion: The high temperature drying of P. sylvestris var. mongolica presented a good drying effect. Solar predrying could save a lot of energy consumption, whereas the joint of solar energy and high temperature drying could show efficient and green drying.

Key words: plantation-grown Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, high temperature drying, solar drying, joint drying, drying characteristics, energy consumption evaluation

中图分类号: