欢迎访问林业科学,今天是

林业科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 13-21.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160702

• 论文与研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

大兴安岭东部天然落叶松林可加性林分生物量估算模型

董利虎, 李凤日   

  1. 东北林业大学林学院 哈尔滨 150040
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-28 修回日期:2016-05-05 出版日期:2016-07-25 发布日期:2016-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 李凤日
  • 基金资助:
    国家“十二五”科技支撑计划课题(2012BAD22B02);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2572015BX03);黑龙江省留学归国人员科学基金项目(LC2016007)。

Additive Stand-Level Biomass Models for Natural Larch Forest in the East of Daxing'an Mountains

Dong Lihu, Li Fengri   

  1. Forestry College, Northeast Forestry University Harbin 150040
  • Received:2015-04-28 Revised:2016-05-05 Online:2016-07-25 Published:2016-08-16

摘要: [目的] 探讨林分乔木层生物量的估算方法,为大区域、大尺度森林生物量的估算提供理论依据。[方法] 利用1990-2010年5期大兴安岭东部天然落叶松林固定样地数据,选择基于林分变量的林分生物量模型和基于林分蓄积量的林分生物量模型作为林分乔木层生物量估算的方法,利用似然分析法去判断2种模型的误差结构(相加型和相乘型),并采用聚合型可加性生物量模型建立其林分生物量模型,模型参数估计采用非线性似乎不相关回归模型方法。采用“刀切法”评价所建立的林分生物量模型。[结果] 经似然分析法判断,2种模型的误差结构是相乘型的,对数转换的线性回归更适合用来拟合林分生物量数据;2种模型的调整后确定系数Ra2>0.94,平均相对误差ME为0%~5%,平均相对误差绝对值MAE<15%;所建立的2种可加性林分生物量模型的预测精度在98%以上。[结论] 虽然基于林分蓄积量的林分生物量和基于林分变量的林分生物量模型形式不同,但二者都具有较好的预测精度;就本研究而言,2种估算林分生物量的方法都能对大兴安岭东部天然落叶松林林分生物量进行很好地估算。

关键词: 天然落叶松林, 林分生物量, 误差结构, 似然分析法, 可加性模型

Abstract: [Objective] The traditional method based on forest inventory data plays an import role in assessment of forest biomass at regional scale and its dynamics and verification of the remote-sensing based model and improvement of its prediction precision. The forest biomass methods at regional scale have attracted most attention of researchers, developing the stand-level biomass model has become a new trend. Based on 1990-2010 forestry inventory data (the 5th inventory) of natural larch forest in the east of Daxing'an Mountains, we studied how to use two methods (i.e., stand biomass models respectively based on stand variables and stand volume) to establish the additive system of stand-level biomass equations, and analyzed their prediction precisions. These provided technical and theoretical support for accounting and monitoring the Chinese forest biomass and carbon stock.[Method] Structure of model errors (additive vs. multiplicative) of total and component biomass allometric equations in two stand-level biomass of natural larch forest in the east of Daxing'an Mountains were evaluated using the likelihood analysis, and aggregation system was used to establish the stand-level biomass additive models, while nonlinear seemly unrelated regression was used to estimate the parameters in the additive system of biomass equations. The stand-level biomass model validation was accomplished by Jackknifing technique in this study.[Result] The assumption of multiplicative error structure was strongly supported for total and tree components biomass equations in two stand-level biomass additive systems. Thus, the additive system of log-transformed biomass equations should be developed. The adjusted coefficient of determination (Ra2) of two stand-level biomass additive systems for natural larch forest in the east of Daxing'an Mountains were above 0.94, the mean relative error (ME) was between 0%-5%, and the mean absolute relative error (MAE) was less than 15%. All the precisions of total and tree components biomass equations in stand-level biomass additive system were above 98%.[Conclusion] Although the significance of likelihood analysis was used in individual tree biomass equations by several studies, it has not been widely applied in stand-level biomass equations. In addition, in order to estimate model parameters more effectively, the additivity of total and components biomass should be taken into account. Overall, there were differences between the two methods, but good precisions of the two methods were obtained. The two methods would be suitable for predicting the stand-level biomass of natural larch forest in the east of Daxing'an Mountains.

Key words: natural larch forest, stand-level biomass, error structure, likelihood analyses, additive system

中图分类号: