水曲柳生长性状种源与地点互作及优良种源选择

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150318

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】选育适生于帽儿山、带岭、露水河试验地及毗邻地区的生产力高、稳定性好的水曲柳种源。【方法】以帽儿山、带岭与露水河等试点的20个水曲柳种源为材料,对其14年生树高、胸径和材积进行调查并进行单点、多点方差分析与多重比较,然后用Eberhart & Russell联合回归分析法的回归系数b_i对20个水曲柳种源进行稳定性分析,最后用趋势面对水曲柳的地理变异进行分析。【结果】 1)水曲柳树高、胸径和材积在种源间、地点间、种源和地点交互作用间差异均极显著; 其中露水河试点树高较大的种源依次为海林(7.55 m)、带岭(7.34 m)、露水河(7.05 m),胸径较大的种源依次为海林(6.13 cm)、露水河(5.47 cm),材积最大的种源为海林(14 909 cm³); 帽儿山试点树高最大的种源为五常(7.62 m),胸径最大的种源为五常(6.79 cm),材积最大的种源为五常(16 747 cm³); 带岭试点树高较大的种源依次为兴隆(5.67 m)、临江(5.65 m)、东方红(5.61 m),胸径最大的种源为临江(5.07 cm),材积最大的种源为临江(7 984 cm³)。3个试点树高表现优良的种源为五常(6.35 m); 胸径最大的种源为临江(5.35 cm); 材积最大的种源为海林(10 546 cm³)、材积排名第二的种源为五常(9 857 cm³)、材积排名第三的种源为临江(9 818 cm³)。2)稳定性分析结果表明友好、临江、西丰、带岭、汪清、汤旺河6个种源具有平均稳定性,兴隆、露水河、恒仁、海林、弯甸子、绥棱、三岔子7个种源具有高稳定性,辉南、帽儿山、方正、东方红、沾河、桦南、五常7个种源稳定性较差,在有利的环境条件下才具有很大的丰产潜力。3)地理变异分析表明纬度对水曲柳生长具有较大的影响,在西北—东南这一条直线附近的种源材积较高,随着与西北—东南一线距离的增大而降低。【结论】通过比较2年、6年与14年林龄的种源选择结果,发现相对于2年林龄,6年林龄的选择结果与14年林龄的选择结果更为接近,表明种源选择时期不宜过早。本研究的结果可为我国水曲柳的种质资源管理与持续改良提供积极参考。

关键词: 水曲柳, 种源选择, 种源与环境互作, 稳定性

Abstract:

【Objective】 The provenances trial was to select high productivity, good stability of Fraxinus mandshurica provenances for Dailing, Lushuihe and Maoershan where the trials were established and adjacent areas. 【Method】20 provenances of F. mandshurica were used to study the phenotypic variation in tree height (H), diameter at breast height (DBH) and volume (V) at the age of 14 by analysis of variance and multiple comparisons for single site and three sites. Stability of performance was assessed with regression coefficients (b_i) of the joint regression analysis of Eberhart & Russell. Finally, geographic variation was analyzed with trend surface. 【Result】 1) The results showed that there were statistically significant (P<0.01) differences in H, DBH, and V among different sites and provenances, and also significant in site× provenance interaction. At Lushuihe site, the top provenances were Hailin (7.55 m), Dailing (7.34 m) and Lushuihe(7.05 m) in terms of H, Hailin (6.13 cm) and Lushuihe (5.47 cm) in terms of DBH, and Hailin (14 909 cm³) in terms of V. In terms of H(7.62 m), DBH(6.79 cm) and V(16 747 cm³) together, Wuchang was selected at Maoershan site. Xinglong (5.67 m), Linjiang (5.65 m) and Dongfanghong (5.61 m) were selected in terms of H, Linjiang selected in terms of DBH(5.07 cm) and V(7 984 cm³) at Dailing site. For all three sites, provenance Wuchang was selected in terms of H(6.35 m), Linjiang in terms of DBH(5.35 cm), Hailin(10 546 cm³), Wuchang(9 857 cm³) and Linjiang(9 818 cm³) in terms of V. 2) The stability analysis showed the provenances of Youhao, Linjiang, Xifeng, Dailing, Wangqing and Tangwanghe had an average stability, the provenances of Xinglong, Lushuihe, Hengren, Hailin, Wandianzi, Suiling and Sanchazi had a high stability, the provenances of Huinan, Maoershan, Fangzheng, Dongfanghong, Zhanhe, Huanan and Wuchang had a low stability. 3) Geographic variation analysis showed that the effect of latitude was greater than that of longitude on the growth of F. mandshurica, the volume of the provenances along the direction from northwest to southeast was larger than the others. 【Conclusion】It was found that the selection at 14-year-old was closer to the selection at 6-year-old than to the selection at 2-year-old, indicating that provenances selection was not stable if it was made too early. The results provide a useful basis for germplasm management and genetic improvement of F. mandshurica.

Key words: Fraxinus mandshurica, provenance selection, provenance by site interaction, stability

中图分类号:

S722.7

赵兴堂, 夏德安, 曾凡锁, 姚盛智, 商永亮, 张桂芹, 王元兴, 张同伟, 詹亚光. 水曲柳生长性状种源与地点互作及优良种源选择[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(3): 140-147.

Zhao Xingtang, Xia De, Zeng Fansuo, Yao Shengzhi, Shang Yongliang, Zhang Guiqin, Wang Yuanxing, Zhang Tongwei, Zhan Yaguang. Provenances by Sites Interaction of Growth Traits and Provenance Selection of Fraxinus mandshurica[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(3): 140-147.

参考文献

陈伯望, 洪菊生. 1995. 杉木种源胸径生长地理变异的趋势面分析.林业科学, 31(2): 110-115.
(Chen B W, Hong J S. 1995. Trend surface analysis of geographical variation of DBH growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata provenances. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 31(2): 110-115.[in Chinese])
傅耀祥,周胜利,李京.2001.水曲柳性状相关选优方法的探讨.吉林林业科技,30(3): 5-9.
(Fu Y X, Zhou S L, Li J. Study on selective breeding method of correlation characters of Fraxinus mandshurica. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 30(3): 5-9.[in Chinese])
金国庆, 秦国峰, 刘伟宏, 等. 不同林龄马尾松的种源选择效果.林业科学, 47(2): 39-45.
(Jing G Q, Qin G F, Liu W H, et al. Provenance selection effect at different stand age of Pinus massoniana. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 47(2): 39-45.[in Chinese])
刘明宣, 辜云杰,夏川,等. 2014. 枫香地理种源变异与选择. 四川林业科技,35(5): 13-16.
(Liu M X, Gu Y J, Xia C, et al. 2014. A study of variations and selections of Liquidambar formosana geographic provenance. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 35(5): 13-16.[in Chinese])
刘青华, 金国庆, 张蕊,等. 2009. 24年生马尾松生长、形质和木材基本密度的种源变异与种源区划.林业科学, 45(10): 55-61.
(Liu Q H, Jin G Q, Zhang R, et al. 2009. Provenance variation in growth, stem-form and wood density of Masson Pine at 24-year-old and the provenance division. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 45(10): 55-61.[in Chinese])
罗宁. 2014. 闽南优良地理种源选择及其子代林遗传增益分析. 西部林业科学,43(5): 19-23.
(Luo N. 2014. Selection of excellent geographical provenances and analysis of progeny forest genetic gain of Phoebe bournei. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 43(5): 19-23.[in Chinese])
毛爱华,李建祥,张超英,等. 2010. 19年生侧柏种源变异及选择研究. 北京林业大学学报, 32(1): 63-68.
(Mao A H, Li J X, Zhang C Y, et al. 2010. Geographic variation and provenance selection of Platycladus orientalis in a 19-year-old testing plantation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 32(1): 63-68.[in Chinese])
孟宪婷.2009. 东北试点不同种源水曲柳遗传分化的研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学硕士学位论文.
(Meng X T. 2009. Study on genetic differentiation of Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. in different provenances northeast of China. Harbin: MS thesis of Northeast Forestry University.[in Chinese])
申文辉,朱积余,刘秀,等. 2014. 红锥种源区域试验与优良种源选择. 中南林业科技大学学报,34(3): 11-17.
(Shen W H, Zhu J Y, Liu X, et al. 2014. Regional testing and superior provenance selection of Castanopsis hystrix provenances. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 34(3): 11-17.[in Chinese])
时立文. 2012. SPSS19.0统计分析从入门到精通. 北京: 清华大学出版社.
(Shi L W. 2012. SPSS19.0 Statistical Analysis:From Novice to Professional. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.[in Chinese])
田俊德,陈晓波,叶燕萍,等. 1994. 吉林试点水曲柳种源选择试验初报. 吉林林业科技, (4): 14-16.
(Tian J D, Chen X B, Ye Y P, et al. 1994. Preliminary report on Fraxinus mandshurica provenance selection of Jilin region. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 109(4): 14-16.[in Chinese])
王继刚. 2001.水曲柳最佳种源选择与种源区划.哈尔滨: 东北林业大学硕士学位论文.
(Wang J G. 2001.Study on the selection of optimal provenance and provenance division of Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr. Harbin: MS thesis of Northeast Forestry University.[in Chinese])
王军辉,顾万春,李斌,等. 2000. 桤木优良种源/家系的选择研究—生长的适应性与稳定性分析. 林业科学, 36(3): 59-66.
(Wang J H,Gu W C,Li B,et al. 2000. Study on selection of Alnus gremastogyne provenance/family: analysis of growth adaptation and genetic stability. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 36(3): 59-66.[in Chinese])
吴富桢. 2007. 测树学. 北京: 中国林业出版社.
(Wu F Z. 2007. Studies of measuring tree. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.[in Chinese])
谢运海. 2005.东北试点水曲柳地理种源遗传多样性分析及优良种源选择. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学硕士学位论文.
(Xie Y H. 2005. Analysis of genetic diversity and selection of the geography provenance for Fraxinus mandshurica Rup. in northeast of China. Harbin: MS thesis of Northeast Forestry University.[in Chinese])
张怡,韦小丽,王娈,等. 2014. 不同地理种源猴樟苗期生长变异性. 西南农业学报, 27(5): 2162-2167.
(Zhang Y, Wei X L, Wang L, et al. 2014. Growth variability of Cinnamomum bodinieri seedlings from different geographical provenances. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(5): 2162-2167.[in Chinese])
赵曦阳,李颖,赵丽,等. 2013.不同地点白杨杂种无性系生长和适应性表现分析和评价. 北京林业大学学报, 35(6): 7-14.
(Zhao X Y, Li Y, Zhao L, et al. 2013. Analysis and evaluation of growth and adaptive performance of White Poplar hybrid clones in different sites. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 35(6): 7-14.[in Chinese])
郑仁华,苏顺德,赵青毅,等. 2014. 福建柏种源生长性状遗传变异及种源选择. 福建林学院学报,34(3): 249-254.
(Zheng R H, Su S D, Zhao Q Y, et al.2014. Genetic variation and selection for growth in the provenances of Fokienia hodginsii. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry,34(3): 249-254.[in Chinese])
Caliński T, Czajka S, Kaczmarek Z, et al. 2009. A mixed model analysis of variance for multi-environment variety trials. Statistical Papers, 50(4): 735-759.
Carrasquinho I, Gonalves E. 2013. Genetic variability among Pinus pinea L. provenances for survival and growth traits in Portugal. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 9(3): 855-866.
Deng B, Fang S, Yang W, et al. 2014. Provenance variation in growth and wood properties of juvenile Cyclocarya paliurus. New Forests, DOI 10.1007/s11056-014-9424-x.
Goh D K S, Bacilieri R, Chaix G, et al. 2013. Growth variations and heritabilities of teak CSO-derived families and provenances planted in two humid tropical sites. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 9(5): 1329-1341.
Hung T D, Brawner J T, Meder R, et al. 2014. Estimates of genetic parameters for growth and wood properties in Eucalyptus pellita F. Muell. to support tree breeding in Vietnam. Annals of Forest Science, DOI 10.1007/s13595-014-0426-9.
Míguez-Soto B, Fernández-López J. 2015.Variation in adaptive traits among and within Spanish and European populations of Castanea sativa: selection of trees for timber production. New Forests, 46(1): 23-50.
Nagamitsu T, Nagasaka K, Yoshimaru H, et al. 2014. Provenance tests for survival and growth of 50-year-old Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) trees related to climatic conditions in central Japan. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 10(1): 87-99.
Pande P K, Kumar A, Ravichandran S, et al. 2013. Genetic analysis of growth and wood variations in Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Journal of Forestry Research, 24(3): 485-493.
Peper P J, Alzate C P, McNeil J W, et al. 2014. Allometric equations for urban ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) in Oakville, Southern Ontario, Canada. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(1): 175-183.
Semenzato P, Cattaneo D, Dainese M. 2011. Growth prediction for five tree species in an Italian urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(3): 169-176.

[1]	王思文, 卫星, 李虹谕, 韦庆钰. 水曲柳轻基质容器苗菌根化生长效应[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2): 173-181.
[2]	徐康, 吕建雄, 刘君良, 吴义强, 李贤军. 浸渍后处理及干燥处理对木材树脂浸渍改性效果的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(4): 84-92.
[3]	顾伟, 马玲, 孙虎, 王利东, 张子龙. 不同土壤环境下落叶松人工林昆虫群落结构及动态的差异[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5): 97-106.
[4]	朱凯月, 王庆成, 吴文娟. 林隙大小对蒙古栎和水曲柳人工更新幼树生长和形态的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(4): 150-157.
[5]	张鹏, 宋博洋, 吴灵东, 沈海龙. 解除休眠的水曲柳种子对不同脱水条件的萌发和生理响应[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(3): 60-67.
[6]	丁中建, 田建国. 固化时pH环境对脲醛树脂水解稳定性及结晶度的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(12): 120-125.
[7]	刘宇, 徐焕文, 尚福强, 焦宏, 张利民, 罗建新, 滕文华, 刘桂丰. 16年生白桦种源变异及区划[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 48-56.
[8]	卫星, 吕琳, 李贵雨, 汤园园. 空气修根对水曲柳无纺布袋容器苗生长及根系发育的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(9): 133-138.
[9]	马玲, 问荣荣, 焦玥, 刘雪英, 张静, 刘哲强, 顾伟, 满子源, 张曼胤. 小兴安岭不同林型的昆虫多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(2): 82-90.
[10]	刘彬彬, 孙芳利, 吴华平, 杨秀树, 饶瑾, Nayebare Kakwara Prosper, 徐君庭. 载药聚丙烯酸/聚乙二醇半互穿聚合物网络在木材中的原位构建及其性能[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(11): 134-141.
[11]	杨博文, 胡立江, 沈海龙, 孙相臣, 张鹏. 高台整地和苗木截干对水曲柳次生林下水曲柳栽植苗成活及生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(8): 104-113.
[12]	郭洪武, 刘毅, 付展, 胡极航, 张帆. 乙酰化处理对樟子松木材耐光性和热稳定性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(6): 135-140.
[13]	刘晓晗, 王峰, 董爱荣, 陈俏丽, 刘立宏, 零雅茗, 王博文, 丁晓霞, 王世新. 粗毛纤孔菌糖苷水解酶5基因克隆及蛋白质结构分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(2): 163-168.
[14]	康雨宁, 陈文帅, 于海鹏. 纤维素纳米晶须对二氧化钛电流变体系的性能改善[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(11): 97-102.
[15]	宋启亮, 董希斌. 大兴安岭不同类型低质林群落稳定性的综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 10-17.