中亚热带典型森林类型林分乔木碳储量生长模型

doi:10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20250256

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: Through integrating site factors, forest age, and stand density effects, a growth model of arbor carbon storage in typical forest stands in the mid-subtropical zone of China was constructed to accurately analyze growth dynamics in stand carbon storage, providing guidance for estimating forest carbon sequestration potential. Method: This study focused on typical forest types in the mid-subtropical zone of China. The survey data from 30 700 permanent forest plots in three continuous national forest inventories were collected. A site classification algorithm based on stand mean height growth was employed to categorize site class. With the stand mean age, site class, and stand density index as explanatory variables, stand carbon storage growth models were constructed under different forest origins (natural vs. planted) by region and dominant tree species (groups). The study further analyzed the growth dynamics of stand carbon storage. Result: 1) All mean height growth models for mid-subtropical forest stands achieved excellent goodness-of-fit, with R²≥0.931. The total height growth had a positive correlation with site class. The cumulative height growth across five site classes followed an approximately arithmetic sequence, indicating effective classification. 2) The stand carbon storage growth models based on site class, stand mean age and stand density index all reached satisfactory predictive accuracy (R²≥0.633). The model performance for different forest origins varied: for coniferous pure forest, the models showed better fit in plantations than natural forests, while for mixed forest, the models performed better in natural forests. Additionally, the models generally outperformed for coniferous species than broadleaved species. 3) All carbon storage models revealed that asymptotic values followed a decreasing trend (a₁>a₂>a₃>a₄>a₅) across site classes, with nearly constant differences between adjacent grades. Natural forests exhibited higher maximum carbon storage per hectare than plantations, and broadleaved mixed forests consistently demonstrated high carbon storage potential across all origins. 4) Under medium-quality site conditions, both plantation and natural forest carbon storage increased with stand age and tended to stabilize at near-mature and mature stages, though plantations reached their inflection points earlier than natural forests. Conclusion: The established stand mean height growth models and stand carbon storage growth models for various forest types demonstrate satisfactory fitting effect and high predictive accuracy. The developed stand carbon storage growth model, incorporating stand origin, stand age, site class, and stand density index, can effectively predict the dynamic changes of stand carbon storage with age for major tree species (groups) across different site classes in this region. Furthermore, this model can be applied to compile carbon accounting tables for typical forest types in the region.

Key words: high growth model, site class, stand density, stand carbon storage growth model

CLC Number:

S718.55

Huiling Tian,Jianhua Zhu,Xiao He,Xinyun Chen,Ran Wang,Wenfa Xiao,Xiangdong Lei. Growth Model of Arbor Carbon Storage in Typical Forest Stands in the Mid-Subtropical Zone of China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2026, 62(2): 15-24.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 4

Parameter estimation and goodness of fit of arbor carbon storage growth models for typical forest stands by site classes"

起源 Origin	森林类型 Forest type	样本数 Sample size	参数估计值 Parameter estimates								评价指标 Evaluation indices
起源 Origin	森林类型 Forest type	样本数 Sample size	a₁	a₂	a₃	a₄	a₅	b₁	b₂	c	R²	RMSE	rRMSE（%）
人工林 Plantation	华山松 Pinus armandii	230	102.10	92.34	87.18	78.77	63.50	0.525 50	1.834 0	0.349 2	0.811 9	7.758	24.02
	马尾松 Pinus massoniana	1 622	119.40	107.80	89.28	77.61	61.68	0.202 10	1.187 0	0.528 0	0.768 9	9.751	30.86
	湿地松 Pinus elliottii	374	70.84	65.58	61.12	57.57	42.79	1.754 00	1.762 0	0.408 2	0.777 1	5.588	25.95
	杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	5 833	104.80	89.91	79.95	70.15	55.32	0.264 50	1.258 0	0.455 6	0.816 2	7.463	23.74
	柏木Cupressus funebris	631	52.09	54.93	50.29	47.63	44.87	0.938 70	1.359 0	0.366 9	0.695 6	6.274	19.55
	桉树 Eucalyptus spp.	302	51.53	47.39	38.04	28.04	26.26	2.538 00	1.130 0	0.531 7	0.758 4	5.659	28.48
	其他软阔类 Other soft broadleaf	269	64.81	59.33	49.34	45.39	37.53	1.764 00	1.002 0	0.701 9	0.656 2	10.02	34.00
	针叶混交林 Mixed coniferous	1 127	79.44	74.11	70.02	62.21	54.20	0.430 20	1.510 0	0.313 8	0.784 2	6.659	19.50
	阔叶混交林 Mixed broadleaf	355	110.10	96.48	85.34	76.64	56.96	0.432 20	1.218 0	0.552 4	0.670 9	11.270	42.79
	针阔混交林 Mixed coniferous and broadleaf	1 141	129.10	115.50	99.41	91.16	70.14	0.177 60	1.154 0	0.482 3	0.712 5	10.510	32.47
天然林 Natural forest	马尾松 Pinus massoniana	4 877	128.10	116.70	100.9	85.98	70.71	0.154 30	1.111 0	0.562 0	0.748 9	9.352	30.03
	高山松 Pinus densata	112	123.80	103.40	79.90	72.34	53.46	0.277 40	1.214 0	0.449 6	0.906 1	7.423	14.06
	杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata	1 508	76.05	71.85	64.18	56.45	48.54	0.268 30	1.070 0	0.529 6	0.795 2	6.021	24.71
	柏木 Cupressus funebris	554	47.80	46.77	43.61	39.75	33.74	0.584 40	0.931 9	0.534 6	0.633 0	7.196	22.26
	栎类 Quercus spp.	1 773	249.60	223.50	205.70	195.10	169.8	0.144 60	1.336 0	0.633 9	0.762 4	18.890	41.15
	其他硬阔类 Other hard broadleaf	847	262.60	230.10	219.50	187.90	174.30	0.060 45	1.407 0	0.442 4	0.768 0	14.170	31.52
	针叶混交林 Mixed coniferous	1 704	83.02	79.02	73.59	67.07	60.68	0.248 00	1.284 0	0.377 3	0.792 6	5.898	18.21
	阔叶混交林 Mixed broadleaf	8 290	233.50	207.00	181.70	162.90	139.40	0.096 58	0.992 7	0.707 6	0.729 5	15.560	37.21
	针阔混交林 Mixed coniferous and broadleaf	3 385	130.90	119.00	108.70	95.32	83.49	0.166 60	1.075 0	0.558 8	0.733 8	9.290	27.39

Table 4

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 0

	曹　磊, 刘晓彤, 李海奎, 等. 广东省常绿阔叶林生物量生长模型. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33 (5): 61- 67.
	Cao L, Liu X T, Li H K, et al. Biomass growth models for evergreen broad-leaved forests in Guangdong. Forest Research, 2020, 33 (5): 61- 67.
	陈　亮, 周国模, 杜华强, 等. 基于随机森林模型的毛竹林CO₂通量模拟及其影响因子. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (8): 1- 12. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180801
	Chen L, Zhou G M, Du H Q, et al. Simulation of CO₂ flux and controlling factors in moso bamboo forest using random forest algorithm. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (8): 1- 12. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180801
	付　晓, 张煜星, 王雪军. 2060年前我国森林生物量碳库及碳汇潜力预测. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (2): 32- 41.
	Fu X, Zhang Y X, Wang X J. Prediction of forest biomass carbon pool and carbon sink potential in China before 2060. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (2): 32- 41.
	郭泽鑫, 胡中岳, 曹　聪, 等. 广东主要森林类型林分生物量和碳储量模型研建. 林业科学, 2023, 59 (12): 37- 50. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230039
	Guo Z X, Hu Z Y, Cao C, et al. Stand-level models of biomass and carbon stock for major forest types in Guangdong. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59 (12): 37- 50. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230039
	国家林业局. 2017a. 立木生物量模型及碳计量参数: 桦树(LY/T 2659—2016). 北京: 中国标准出版社.
	State Forestry Administration. 2017a. Tree biomass models and related parameters to carbon accounting for birch (LY/T 2659—2016). Beijing: China Standard Press. ［in Chinese］
	国家林业局. 2017b. 立木生物量模型及碳计量参数: 冷杉(LY/T 2656—2016). 北京: 中国标准出版社.
	State Forestry Administration. 2017b. Tree biomass models and related parameters to carbon accounting for fir (LY/T 2656—2016). Beijing: China Standard Press. ［in Chinese］
	国家林业局. 2017c. 立木生物量模型及碳计量参数: 栎树(LY/T 2658—2016). 北京: 中国标准出版社.
	State Forestry Administration. 2017c. Tree biomass models and related parameters to carbon accounting for Oak tree (LY/T 2658—2016). Beijing: China Standard Press. ［in Chinese］
	何　潇, 李海奎, 张逸如, 等. 天然次生林碳储量生长模型与固碳能力驱动力研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2023, 45 (1): 1- 10. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210265
	He X, Li H K, Zhang Y R, et al. Growth model of carbon storage and driving force of carbon sequestration capacity of natural secondary forests. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2023, 45 (1): 1- 10. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210265
	何　潇, 周超凡, 雷相东, 等. 长白落叶松人工林林分碳储量生长模型系研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43 (11): 1- 10. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210040
	He X, Zhou C F, Lei X D, et al. Stand carbon stock growth model system for Larix olgensis plantation. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2021, 43 (11): 1- 10. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210040
	贺　鹏, 陈振雄, 彭检贵. 湖南省主要树种单木相容性生物量模型系统研建. 北京林业大学学报, 2025, 47 (3): 61- 72. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240436
	He P, Chen Z X, Peng J G. Development of a compatible biomass model system for individual trees of major tree species in Hunan Province of central China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2025, 47 (3): 61- 72. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20240436
	黄金金, 刘晓彤, 张逸如, 等. 广东省含参数分级的阔叶林分生物量生长模型. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44 (5): 19- 33. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210403
	Huang J J, Liu X T, Zhang Y R, et al. Stand biomass growth model of broadleaved forest with parameter classification in Guangdong Province of southern China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2022, 44 (5): 19- 33. doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210403
	雷相东, 符利勇, 李海奎, 等. 基于林分潜在生长量的立地质量评价方法与应用. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (12): 116- 126. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181213
	Lei X D, Fu L Y, Li H K, et al. Methodology and applications of site quality assessment based on potential mean annual increment. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (12): 116- 126. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181213
	李海奎, 法　蕾. 基于分级的全国主要树种树高-胸径曲线模型. 林业科学, 2011, 47 (10): 83- 90. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20111013
	Li H K, Fa L. Height-diameter model for major tree species in China using the classified height method. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47 (10): 83- 90. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20111013
	李海奎, 宁金魁. 基于树木起源、立地分级和龄组的单木生物量模型. 生态学报, 2012, 32 (3): 740- 757. doi: 10.5846/stxb201106300978
	Li H K, Ning J K. Individual tree biomass model by tree origin, site classes and age groups. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32 (3): 740- 757. doi: 10.5846/stxb201106300978
	唐守正, 郎奎建, 李海奎. 2009. 统计和生物数学模型计算: ForStat教程. 北京: 科学出版社.
	Tang S Z, Lang K J, Li H K. 2009. Statistical and biomathematics model calculation: ForStat course. Beijing: Science Press. ［in Chinese］
	王靖钰, 李国栋, 任晓娟, 等. 南北过渡带常绿落叶阔叶混交林碳通量特征及其对环境因子的响应. 生态学报, 2024, 44 (14): 6243- 6253.
	Wang J Y, Li G D, Ren X J, et al. Carbon flux characteristics and responses to environmental factors in the evergreen⁃deciduous broadleaf mixed forest of the north⁃south transitional zone. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44 (14): 6243- 6253.
	曾伟生, 王雪军, 陈振雄, 等. 林分起源对立木生物量模型的影响分析. 林业资源管理, 2014 (2): 40- 45.
	Zeng W S, Wang X J, Chen Z X, et al. Analysis of impacts of forest origin on single tree biomass models. Forest Resources Management, 2014 (2): 40- 45.
	张瀚月. 2022. 中国主要树种生长量与碳汇量测计方法研究与应用. 北京: 北京林业大学.
	Zhang H Y. 2022. Research and application of measurement and statistics for the growth and carbon sink of major tree species in China. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. ［in Chinese］
	张继平, 张林波, 刘春兰, 等. 井冈山中亚热带森林植被碳储量及固碳潜力估算. 生态环境学报, 2016, 25 (1): 9- 14.
	Zhang J P, Zhang L B, Liu C L, et al. Estimation of carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential of mid-subtropical forest in jinggang mountain national nature reserve. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2016, 25 (1): 9- 14.
	赵　菡, 雷渊才, 符利勇. 江西省不同立地等级的马尾松林生物量估计和不确定性度量. 林业科学, 2017, 53 (8): 81- 93. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170810
	Zhao H, Lei Y C, Fu L Y. Biomass and uncertainty estimates of Pinus massoniana forest for different site classes in Jiangxi Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53 (8): 81- 93. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170810
	Cai W X, He N P, Li M X, et al. Carbon sequestration of Chinese forests from 2010 to 2060: spatiotemporal dynamics and its regulatory strategies. Science Bulletin, 2022, 67 (8): 836- 843. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2021.12.012
	Chai Z Z, Tan W. Impacts of close-to-nature management on the stand states of masson pine forests. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2020, 6 (1): 45- 54.
	Clark J S, Bell D M, Hersh M H, et al. Climate change vulnerability of forest biodiversity: climate and competition tracking of demographic rates: forests, clima te change, and competition. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17 (5): 1834- 1849. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02380.x
	Contestabile M. A new policy field. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4 (11): 954.
	de Souza H J, Miguel E P, Nascimento R G M, et al. Thinning-response modifier term in growth models: an application on clonal Tectona grandis Linn F. stands at the Amazonian region. Forest Ecology and Management, 2022, 511, 120109. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120109
	Dong L H, Li F R, Jia W W. Development of a statistical approach for predicting the spatial distribution of branch size for planted larch (Larix olgensis) trees in northeast China. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27 (2): 347- 355.
	Forrester D I, Bauhus J. A review of processes behind diversity: productivity relationships in forests. Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 (1): 45- 61. doi: 10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
	Jat M L, Chakraborty D, Ladha J K, et al. Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in south Asia. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3 (4): 336- 343. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-0500-2
	Ketterings Q M, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, et al. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 146 (1/2/3): 199- 209.
	Li H K, Zhao P X. Improving the accuracy of tree-level aboveground biomass equations with height classification at a large regional scale. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 289, 153- 163. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.002
	Luo Y J, Wang X K, Ouyang Z Y, et al. A review of biomass equations for China’s tree species. Earth System Science Data, 2020, 12 (1): 21- 40. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-21-2020
	Luo Y J, Wang X K, Zhang X Q, et al. Root: shoot ratios across China’s forests: forest type and climatic effects. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 269, 19- 25. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.005
	Reineke L H. Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. Journal of Agricultural Research, 1933, 46 (7): 627- 638.
	Sileshi G W. A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 329, 237- 254. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.026
	Wyss A B, Sofer T, Lee M K, et al. Multiethnic meta-analysis identifies ancestry-specific and cross-ancestry loci for pulmonary function. Nature Communications, 2018, 9 (1): 2976. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05369-0
	Xiang W, Lei X D, Zhang X Q. Modelling tree recruitment in relation to climate and competition in semi-natural Larix-Picea-Abies forests in northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 382, 100- 109. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.050
	Xu B, Guo Z D, Piao S L, et al. Biomass carbon stocks in China’s forests between 2000 and 2050: a prediction based on forest biomass-age relationships. Science China Life Sciences, 2010, 53 (7): 776- 783. doi: 10.1007/s11427-010-4030-4
	Zhang C H, Ju W M, Chen J M, et al. Sustained biomass carbon sequestration by China’s forests from 2010 to 2050. Forests, 2018, 9 (11): 689. doi: 10.3390/f9110689

起源Origin	变量Variables	平均值Mean	最小值Min.	最大值Max.	标准差SD
人工林 Plantation	林分平均年龄Stand mean age (A)/a	19.4	5	68	9.6
	林分平均高Stand mean height (H)/m	9.2	1.3	26	3.3
	平均胸径Mean diameter (D_g)/cm	11.0	7.4	26.1	2.7
	林分密度指数Stand density index (SDI)/(tree·hm^?2)	639.5	43.1	3 226.1	398.0
	林分公顷蓄积量Stand stock volume/(m³·hm^?2)	74.5	0.1	595.9	63.1
	林分碳储量Stand carbon storage/(t·hm^?2)	31.1	0.2	116.1	17. 6
天然林 Natural forest	林分平均年龄Stand mean age (A)/a	26.3	5	120	13.7
	林分平均高Stand mean height (H)/m	9.3	1.3	28	3.1
	平均胸径Mean diameter (D_g)/cm	11.1	7.6	38	3.0
	林分密度指数Stand density index (SDI)/(tree·hm^?2)	554. 5	45.1	2 410. 6	312.8
	林分公顷蓄积量Stand stock volume/(m³·hm^?2)	76.5	0.3	567.9	62.4
	林分碳储量Stand carbon storage/(t·hm^?2)	36.8	0.6	261.1	25.7

因子Factor	划分条件Classification criteria
海拔Elevation	200 m一个等级 A class per 200 m
坡度Slope	10°一个等级 A class per 10°
坡向Aspect	北坡 North；东北坡 Northeast；东坡 East；东南坡Southeast；南坡 South；西南坡 Southwest；西坡 West；西北坡 Northwest；无坡向 No aspect
坡位Slope position	脊部 Ridge；上坡 Upper；中坡 Middle；下坡 Lower；山谷（或山洼） Valley；平地 Flat
土层厚度Soil depth	20 cm一个等级 A class per 20 cm
腐殖层厚度Humus depth	薄Thin：<2 cm；中Moderate：2～5 cm；厚Thick：>5 cm

起源 Origin	森林类型 Forest type	参数估计值 Parameter estimates							评价指标 Evaluation indices
起源 Origin	森林类型 Forest type	a₁	a₂	a₃	a₄	a₅	b	c	R²	RMSE	rRMSE（%）
人工林 Plantation	华山松 Pinus armandii	16.5	13.0	10.5	7.70	5.01	0.050 00	0.762	0.955	0.691	8.46
	马尾松 Pinus massoniana	44.6	34.7	27.6	21.30	14.50	0.007 00	0.589	0.958	0.760	7.84
	湿地松 Pinus elliottii	20.9	16.4	13.6	11.30	8.04	0.057 70	1.160	0.967	0.584	7.07
	杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata	22.4	17.5	13.8	10.70	7.42	0.043 40	0.790	0.953	0.707	7.93
	柏木Cupressus funebris	17.0	13.5	10.9	8.70	6.42	0.097 50	1.370	0.932	0.704	7.38
	桉树 Eucalyptus spp.	18.8	15.0	11.6	8.72	5.72	0.467 00	1.300	0.950	0.863	7.99
	其他软阔类 Other soft broadleaf	22.6	17.0	13.1	10.20	6.74	0.160 00	1.380	0.952	0.911	8.87
	针叶混交林 Mixed coniferous	18.7	14.9	12.2	9.75	7.19	0.052 30	0.757	0.950	0.663	7.00
	阔叶混交林 Mixed broadleaf	17.7	13.5	10.9	8.22	5.69	0.175 00	1.570	0.949	0.801	8.62
	针阔混交林 Mixed coniferous and broadleaf	23.3	18.1	14.6	11.50	7.86	0.014 00	0.365	0.931	0.736	8.29
天然林 Natural forest	马尾松 Pinus massoniana	44.3	34.6	27.6	21.20	14.70	0.007 79	0.592	0.944	0.884	8.61
	高山松 Pinus densata	23.0	17.5	12.4	8.93	4.70	0.044 10	1.220	0.979	0.837	6.92
	杉木 Cunninghamia lanceolata	17.8	14.1	11.3	8.90	6.31	0.046 00	0.659	0.946	0.629	7.47
	柏木 Cupressus funebris	15.0	12.5	10.4	8.49	6.06	0.091 30	1.720	0.942	0.672	6.64
	栎类 Quercus spp.	23.4	17.3	13.7	10.80	7.56	0.013 80	0.448	0.952	0.800	8.85
	其他硬阔类 Other hard broadleaf	24.4	18.2	14.5	11.30	8.17	0.005 85	0.277	0.940	0.806	8.68
	针叶混交林 Mixed coniferous	31.6	24.2	19.4	15.30	10.90	0.010 90	0.529	0.943	0.717	7.51
	阔叶混交林 Mixed broadleaf	27.4	20.9	16.8	13.40	9.89	0.011 90	0.485	0.945	0.688	7.59
	针阔混交林 Mixed coniferous and broadleaf	35.4	27.0	21.1	16.50	12.00	0.008 31	0.521	0.943	0.687	7.63

[1]	Pingping Li,Yanhui Wang,Pengtao Yu,Yirui Wang,Wenbiao Duan,Yanfang Wan,Xiaocha Wei,Zaijun Shi. Growth Response of Black Locust Plantations to Site Quality and Stand Density on the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(7): 192-207.
[2]	Xiao He,Guangcheng Luo,Wenqiang Gao,Haikui Li,Weisheng Zeng,Fujun Duan,Xiangdong Lei. Carbon Sequestration Potentiality of Pinus tabuliformis Pure Forest in Zhongtiaoshan Forestry Bureau of Shanxi Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(5): 74-84.
[3]	Weisheng Zeng,Xueyun Yang,Ying Pu. Tree Crown Width Model, Stand Density Model and Their Relationships for Natural Larch [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(2): 93-100.
[4]	Xinsheng Han,Yanhui Wang,Pengtao Yu,Zhenhua Li,Yipeng Yu,Xiao Wang. Construction of Multi-Factor Response Coupling Models of Tree Height and DBH Growth of Larix principis-rupprechtii Plantations in Northern Liupan Mountains, Ningxia [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2024, 60(11): 13-24.
[5]	Long Shisheng, Zeng Siqi, Yang Shengyang. Maximum Density-Size Line for Oak Natural Forest Based on Improved Stand Density Index [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(9): 13-22.
[6]	Haifei Lu,Wangshu Liu,Jianmin Xu,Guangyou Li,Chunjie Fan,Guojian Liang,Lei Zhang. Site Classification and Quality Evaluation of Eucalyptus urophylla×E. grandis Plantation in the South Central Guangxi, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(5): 13-24.
[7]	Wu Ju, Chen Yu, Liu Haixuan, Xu Lijuan, Jin Guixiang, Xu Chengyang. Effects of Stand Density and Mingling Intensity on Tree Morphology in Natural Scenic Forest in Changbai Mountain [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(12): 12-21.
[8]	Lei Xiangdong, Fu Liyong, Li Haikui, Li Yutang, Tang Shouzheng. Methodology and Applications of Site Quality Assessment Based on Potential Mean Annual Increment [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(12): 116-126.
[9]	Zhao Han, Lei Yuancai, Fu Liyong. Biomass and Uncertainty Estimates of Pinus massoniana Forest for Different Site Classes in Jiangxi Province [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(8): 81-93.
[10]	Du Jian, Liang Kunnan, Zhou Zaizhi, Huang Guihua, Li Bijun, Ma Huaming. Site Classification and Evaluation of Teak Plantation in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(9): 1-10.
[11]	Tian Xinhui;Sun Rongxi;Li Jun;Zhao Changhai;Yang Minsheng. Effects of Stand Density on Growth of Populus×euramericana’Neva’ Plantations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(3): 184-188.
[12]	Liu Qinghua;Zhou Zhichun;Zhang Kaiming;Lan Yongzhao;Wu Jifu;Nie Guoqin. Initial Stand Density and Provenance Effects on the Growth and Wood Basic Density of Masson Pine [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(9): 58-64.
[13]	Lei Xiangdong;Li Yongci;Xiang Wei. Individual Basal Area Growth Model Using Multi-Level Linear Mixed Model with Repeated Measures [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2009, 12(1): 74-80.
[14]	Wu Jiyou;Wang Xujun;Liao Dezhi;Cheng Yong;Hou Boxin;He Caisheng. Performance Features and Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Urban Forest in the Ice-Snow Disaster [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2008, 44(11): 59-64.
[15]	Jia Yun;Zhang Limin;Tan Xueren;Wang Wei;Zhang Huayou. Studies on Technique for Suitable Density Control of Pinus koraiensis Stand Used for Fruit and Wood [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2006, 42(4): 51-56.

Growth Model of Arbor Carbon Storage in Typical Forest Stands in the Mid-Subtropical Zone of China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 0

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments