Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (7): 12-22.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220702
• Frontier & focus: forestry practice of the " Two Mountains" Idea • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fanbin Kong1,2,Ning Wang2,Caiyao Xu1,2,*
Received:
2022-07-13
Online:
2022-07-25
Published:
2022-11-03
Contact:
Caiyao Xu
CLC Number:
Fanbin Kong,Ning Wang,Caiyao Xu. Value Realization Efficiency of Forest Ecological Products in the Birthplace of "Two Mountains " Idea[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(7): 12-22.
Table 1
Input-output index system and method of forest ecological product value realization efficiency"
类别 Category | 一级指标 Primary index | 二级指标 Secondary index | 三级指标 Tertiary index | 评估方法 Methods |
投入指标 Input indicators | 森林生态产品价值 The value of forest ecological products | 物质产品价值 Material product value | 林产品 Forest products | 市场价值法 Market value method |
调节服务价值 Regulating service value | 涵养水源 Conservation of water sources | 市场价值法 Market value method | ||
营养累积 Nutrient accumulation | 替代成本法 Alternative costing | |||
固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release | 替代成本法 Alternative costing | |||
净化空气 Purifying air | 替代成本法 Alternative costing | |||
土壤保持 Soil conservation | 影子工程法 Shadow engineering | |||
文化服务价值 Cultural service value | 森林休憩 Forest rest | 旅行费用法 Travel expense law | ||
劳动力 Labor | 林业从业人数 Number of forestry practitioners | |||
物质资本 Physical capital | 林业固定资产投资完成额 Amount of forestry fixed assets investment | |||
产出指标 Output indicators | 林业产业产值 Output value of forestry industry | 林业第一产业产值 Output value of primary forestry industry | ||
林业第二产业产值 Output value of secondary forestry industry | ||||
林业第三产业产值 Output value of forestry tertiary industry |
Table 2
The value of forest ecological products in Zhejiang Province in 2020"
生态产品/服务 Ecological products/services | 价值量 Magnitude of value/100 million RMB | 比重 Proportion(%) |
物质产品 Material products | 125.60 | 1.29 |
涵养水源 Water retention | 0.57 | 0.01 |
营养累积 Nutrient accumulation | 274.68 | 2.82 |
固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release | 4 188.58 | 43.02 |
净化空气 Air purification | 31.32 | 0.32 |
土壤保持 Soil conservation | 2 768.09 | 28.42 |
文化服务 Cultural services | 2 348.34 | 24.12 |
总价值 Total value | 9 737.17 | 100 |
Table 3
The value of forest ecological products in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2020 100 million RMB"
生态产品/服务 Ecological products/servies | 年份Year | ||||||
2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2013 | 2015 | 2018 | 2020 | |
物质产品 Material products | 47.41 | 45.34 | 59.66 | 56.95 | 74.11 | 111.88 | 125.60 |
调节服务 Regulatory services | 6 663.44 | 6 594.46 | 7 854.32 | 9 496.54 | 9 457.30 | 6 490.39 | 7 263.23 |
涵养水源 Water retention | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.57 |
营养累积 Nutritional accumulation | 277.01 | 275.40 | 275.09 | 275.94 | 273.69 | 273.66 | 274.68 |
固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release | 4 224.17 | 4 199.68 | 4 194.86 | 4 207.84 | 4 173.51 | 4 173.09 | 4 188.58 |
净化空气 Air purification | 26.27 | 31.69 | 31.69 | 31.34 | 28.70 | 31.32 | 31.32 |
土壤保持 Soil conservation | 2 135.54 | 2087.20 | 3 352.40 | 4 981.02 | 4 981.02 | 2 011.89 | 2 768.09 |
文化服务 Cultural services | 13.84 | 89.44 | 224.30 | 569.70 | 544.02 | 1 113.31 | 2 348.34 |
总计 Sum | 6 724.69 | 6 729.24 | 8 138.28 | 10 123.19 | 10 075.43 | 7 715.58 | 9 737.17 |
Table 4
Output value and proportion of the first, second, and third industries of forestry in Zhejiang Province"
年份 Year | 林业第一产业 产值 Output value of primary forestry industry/ 100 million RMB | 比重 Proportion (%) | 林业第二产业 产值 Output value of secondary forestry industry/ 100 million RMB | 比重 Proportion (%) | 林业第三产 业产值 Output value of forestry tertiary industry/ 100 million RMB | 比重 Proportion (%) |
2000 | 178.00 | 33.23 | 287.00 | 53.57 | 70.70 | 13.20 |
2005 | 320.60 | 30.23 | 561.20 | 52.90 | 178.90 | 16.87 |
2010 | 549.40 | 27.97 | 978.70 | 49.84 | 435.90 | 22.19 |
2013 | 766.48 | 22.69 | 2 288.65 | 67.75 | 322.76 | 9.56 |
2015 | 840.89 | 22.34 | 2 332.84 | 61.99 | 589.73 | 15.67 |
2018 | 1 007.10 | 20.56 | 2 649.38 | 54.09 | 1 241.54 | 25.35 |
2020 | 1 087.23 | 21.67 | 2 655.93 | 52.94 | 1 273.60 | 25.39 |
Table 5
Ranking of the mean value realization efficiency of forest ecological products in cities in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2020"
决策单元 DMU | 年份Year | 均值 Average | 排序 Rank | ||||||
2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2013 | 2015 | 2018 | 2020 | |||
杭州 Hangzhou | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 1.20 | 1.09 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 11 |
宁波 Ningbo | 1.27 | 1.39 | 1.51 | 1.06 | 1.17 | 1.32 | 1.08 | 1.30 | 5 |
温州 Wenzhou | 0.02 | 1.02 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 1.26 | 1.10 | 1.16 | 0.78 | 10 |
嘉兴 Jiaxing | 17.77 | 3.39 | 3.54 | 3.37 | 3.38 | 3.33 | 3.24 | 5.56 | 1 |
湖州 Huzhou | 1.24 | 1.57 | 1.66 | 1.87 | 1.56 | 2.02 | 2.05 | 1.71 | 2 |
绍兴 Shaoxing | 1.44 | 1.60 | 1.43 | 1.02 | 1.21 | 1.06 | 1.17 | 1.27 | 6 |
金华 Jinhua | 1.86 | 1.47 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.34 | 1.88 | 1.67 | 1.39 | 4 |
衢州 Quzhou | 0.28 | 1.22 | 1.28 | 1.05 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.25 | 1.03 | 9 |
台州 Taizhou | 2.07 | 1.82 | 1.39 | 1.32 | 1.06 | 1.09 | 1.31 | 1.60 | 3 |
丽水 Lishui | 1.09 | 1.15 | 2.61 | 1.31 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 1.25 | 7 |
舟山 Zhoushan | 1.16 | 1.30 | 1.35 | 1.25 | 1.23 | 1.36 | 1.02 | 1.23 | 8 |
均值 Average | 2.60 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.44 | 1.42 | — |
Table 6
Total factor productivity and its decomposition index of forest ecological products in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2020"
时期 Period | EFFCH | TECH | PECH | SECH | TFP |
2000—2005 | 1.021 | 0.006 | 1.13 | 0.904 | 0.006 |
2005—2010 | 1.071 | 5.809 | 1.026 | 1.043 | 1.419 |
2010—2013 | 0.876 | 1.005 | 0.964 | 0.909 | 0.881 |
2013—2015 | 1.101 | 0.525 | 1.022 | 1.077 | 0.578 |
2015—2018 | 0.792 | 1.101 | 0.793 | 1 | 0.873 |
2018—2020 | 1.317 | 0.534 | 1.272 | 1.036 | 0.703 |
均值 Average | 1.016 | 1.024 | 1.024 | 0.993 | 1.04 |
Table 7
Value realization efficiency and decomposition index of forest ecological products in 11 cities in Zhejiang Province from 2000 to 2020"
决策单元 DMU | EFFCH | TECH | PECH | SECH | TFP |
杭州 Hangzhou | 1.207 | 0.855 | 1.196 | 1.009 | 1.031 |
宁波 Ningbo | 1.03 | 0.982 | 1.085 | 0.95 | 1.012 |
温州 Wenzhou | 1.002 | 0.885 | 1 | 1.002 | 0.886 |
嘉兴 Jiaxing | 1 | 0.743 | 1 | 1 | 0.743 |
湖州 Huzhou | 0.959 | 0.79 | 1 | 0.959 | 0.758 |
绍兴 Shaoxing | 0.95 | 0.749 | 1 | 0.95 | 0.712 |
金华 Jinhua | 1 | 1.01 | 1 | 1 | 1.01 |
衢州 Quzhou | 1.052 | 0.864 | 1 | 1.052 | 0.909 |
台州 Taizhou | 1 | 0.796 | 1 | 1 | 0.796 |
丽水 Lishui | 1 | 5.617 | 1 | 1 | 5.617 |
舟山 Zhoushan | 1 | 1.013 | 1 | 1 | 1.013 |
平均值 Average | 1.016 | 1.024 | 1.024 | 0.993 | 1.04 |
Table 8
Average annual input-output slack rate of forest ecological product value realization efficiency in various cities in Zhejiang Province"
决策单元 DMU | 冗余率 Redundancy rate | 不足率 Insufficient rate | |||||||
物质产品 Material products | 调节服务 Regulatory products | 文化服务 Cultural service | 林业产业从业人数 Number of employees in the forestry industry | 林业投资额 Forestry investment | 林业第一产业产值 Output value of primary forestry industry | 林业第二产业产值 Output value of secondary forestry industry | 林业第三产业产值 Output value of forestry tertiary industry | ||
杭州 Hangzhou | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 0.09 | 2.33 | 0.83 | |
宁波 Ningbo | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.66 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
温州 Wenzhou | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 15.87 | 0.01 | 0.46 | 14.23 | 0.20 | |
嘉兴 Jiaxing | 1.76 | 0.43 | 5.38 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.00 | |
湖州 Huzhou | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.53 | |
绍兴 Shaoxing | 0.00 | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
金华 Jinhua | 0.70 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.17 | |
衢州 Quzhou | 0.11 | 0.48 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.00 | |
台州 Taizhou | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.21 | |
丽水 Lishui | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.09 | |
舟山 Zhoushan | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
杜慧彬, 黄立军, 张辰, 等. 中国省级生态福利绩效区域差异性分解和收敛性研究. 生态经济, 2019, 35 (3): 187- 193. | |
Du H B , Huang L J , Zhang C , et al. Research on the regional differences decomposition and convergence mechanism of ecological well-being performance. Ecological Economy, 2019, 35 (3): 187- 193. | |
谷平华, 刘志成. 基于物质流分析的区域工业生态效率评价——以湖南省为例. 经济地理, 2017, 37 (4): 141- 148. | |
Gu P H , Liu Z C . Evaluation of industrial eco efficiency based on material flow analysis —as an example in Hunan Province. Economic Geography, 2017, 37 (4): 141- 148. | |
胡美娟, 丁正山, 李在军, 等. 生态效率视角下旅游业生态福利及驱动因素——以常州市为例. 生态学报, 2020, 40 (6): 1944- 1955. | |
Hu M J , Ding Z S , Li Z J , et al. Tourism ecological welfare and driving factors from the perspective of ecological efficiency: a case study of Changzhou City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40 (6): 1944- 1955. | |
靳诚, 陆玉麒. 2021. 我国生态产品价值实现研究的回顾与展望. 经济地理, 41(10): 207-213. | |
Jin C, Lu Y Q. Review and prospect of research on realization of ecological product value in China. Economic Geography, 41(10): 207-213. [in Chinese] | |
李俊杰, 景一佳. 基于DEA-Malmquist-Tobit模型的环境效率测度及影响因素研究——以河南省为例. 生态经济, 2021, 37 (2): 132- 137.132-137, 145 | |
Li J J , Jing Y J . Research on environmental efficiency measurement and influencing factors based on DEA-Malmquist-Tobit model: taking Henan Province as an example. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37 (2): 132- 137.132-137, 145 | |
李亚云. 2017. 浙江林业产业结构及林业产业综合竞争力研究. 北京: 北京林业大学. | |
Li Y Y. 2017. Research on the forestry industrial structure and forestry industrial competiveness in Zhejiang Province. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
龙亮军, 王霞. 上海市生态福利绩效评价研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27 (2): 84- 92. | |
Long L J , Wang X . A study on Shanghai's ecological well-being performance. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27 (2): 84- 92. | |
陆小成. 新发展阶段北京生态产品价值实现路径研究. 生态经济, 2022, 38 (1): 218- 223. | |
Lu X C . Research on the value realization path of Beijing ecological products in the new development stage. Ecological Economy, 2022, 38 (1): 218- 223. | |
欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究. 生态学报, 1999, (5): 19- 25. | |
Ouyang Z Y , Wang X K , Miao H . A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, (5): 19- 25. | |
沈满洪. 生态经济学. 北京: 中国环境出版社, 2016. | |
Shen M H . Ecological Economics. Beijing: China Environment Press, 2016. | |
孙艺璇, 程钰, 刘娜. 中国经济高质量发展时空演变及其科技创新驱动机制. 资源科学, 2021, 43 (1): 82- 93. | |
Sun Y X , Cheng Y , Liu N . Spatiotemporal evolution of China's high quality economic development and its driving mechanism of scientific and technological innovation. Resources Science, 2021, 43 (1): 82- 93. | |
徐伟. 基于Super-SBM模型和Malmquist指数的中国工业创新效率评价. 宏观经济研究, 2021, (5): 55- 68. | |
Xu W . Evaluation of China's industrial innovation efficiency based on Super-SBM model and Malmquist index. Macroeconomics, 2021, (5): 55- 68. | |
于贵瑞, 杨萌. 自然生态价值、生态资产管理及价值实现的生态经济学基础研究——科学概念、基础理论及实现途径. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33 (5): 1153- 1165. | |
Yu G R , Yang M . Ecological economics foundation research on ecological values, ecological asset management, and value realization: scientific concepts, basic theories, and realization paths. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33 (5): 1153- 1165. | |
张林波, 虞慧怡, 郝超志, 等. 国内外生态产品价值实现的实践模式与路径. 环境科学研究, 2021, 34 (6): 1407- 1416. | |
Zhang L B , Yu H Y , Hao C Z , et al. Practice model and path of ecosystem product value realization. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34 (6): 1407- 1416. | |
张丽佳, 周妍. 建立健全生态产品价值实现机制的路径探索. 生态学报, 2021, 41 (19): 7893- 7899. | |
Zhang L J , Zhou Y . Path exploration of establishing and improving the value realization mechanism of ecological products. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41 (19): 7893- 7899. | |
Chen W D , Si W , Chen Z M . How technological innovations affect urban eco-efficiency in China: a prefecture-level panel data analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 270 (2): 1- 30. | |
OECD. 1998. Eco-efficiency. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Paris: OECD, 1-10. | |
Schaltegger S , Sturm A . Ökologische rationalitt: ansatzpunkte zur ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung, 1990, 44 (4): 273- 290. | |
Wang N , Xu C Y , Kong F B . Value realization and optimization path of forest ecological products. Case study: Zhejiang Province, China. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 2022, 19 (12): 7538. | |
WBCSD. 1996. Eco-efficient leadership for improved economic and environmental performance. New York: WBCSD, 1-10. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||