Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 1-11.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20230114
Previous Articles Next Articles
Ruirui Zhao,Yong Liu*(),Kai Wang
Received:
2023-03-23
Online:
2023-11-25
Published:
2023-12-08
Contact:
Yong Liu
E-mail:lyong@bjfu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Ruirui Zhao,Yong Liu,Kai Wang. Effects of Biochar and Manure on Wood Decomposition and Soil Enzyme Activities Related Soil Nutrient Cycling in a triploid Populus tomentosa Plantation[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(11): 1-11.
Table 1
The four-factor ANOVA of wood stake density loss and moisture content after 2.5 years of decomposition"
方差来源 Source of variation | 密度损失Density loss | 含水量Moisture content | |||||
df | F | P | df | F | P | ||
有机肥Manure (M) | 2 | 4.10 | 0.044 | 2 | 1.27 | 0.317 | |
生物炭Biochar (B) | 2 | 2.01 | 0.176 | 2 | 0.02 | 0.978 | |
放置方式 Location (L) | 1 | 1068.86 | <0.001 | 1 | 38.59 | <0.001 | |
树种Species (S) | 2 | 662.26 | <0.001 | 2 | 30.78 | <0.001 | |
M × B | 4 | 10.05 | <0.001 | 4 | 0.70 | 0.607 | |
M × L | 2 | 5.21 | 0.024 | 2 | 0.47 | 0.635 | |
B × L | 2 | 2.09 | 0.1658 | 2 | 1.12 | 0.358 | |
M × S | 4 | 9.96 | <0.001 | 4 | 2.33 | 0.055 | |
B × S | 4 | 16.19 | <0.001 | 4 | 2.53 | 0.040 | |
L × S | 2 | 71.09 | <0.001 | 2 | 5.86 | 0.003 | |
M × B× L | 4 | 4.85 | 0.015 | 4 | 1.91 | 0.174 | |
M × B× S | 8 | 15.75 | <0.001 | 8 | 4.49 | <0.001 | |
M × L× S | 4 | 1.23 | 0.297 | 4 | 1.97 | 0.097 | |
B × L× S | 4 | 7.39 | <0.001 | 4 | 1.33 | 0.258 | |
M × B× L× S | 8 | 12.06 | <0.001 | 8 | 3.55 | <0.001 |
Table 2
The main effects and interactions of manure, and biochar on soil enzyme activities"
方差来源 Source of variation | 土壤酶 Soil enzymes | ||||||||||||||||||||||
酸性磷酸酶 Acid phosphatase | 纤维素酶 Cellulase | α-葡萄糖苷酶 α-glucosidase | β-葡萄糖苷酶 β-glucosidase | N-乙酰-β-D-葡萄糖苷酶 N-acetyl-β-D-glucosidase | 芳基硫酸酯酶 Aryl sulfatase | ||||||||||||||||||
df | F | P | df | F | P | df | F | P | df | F | P | df | F | P | df | F | P | ||||||
有机肥Manure (M) | 2 | 5.76 | 0.045 | 2 | 1.51 | 0.282 | 2 | 14.26 | 0.003 | 2 | 0.91 | 0.445 | 2 | 8.84 | 0.024 | 2 | 6.37 | 0.033 | |||||
生物炭Biochar (B) | 2 | 0.31 | 0.738 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.962 | 2 | 1.14 | 0.326 | 2 | 1.85 | 0.165 | 2 | 5.19 | 0.008 | 2 | 2.66 | 0.078 | |||||
M × B | 4 | 0.61 | 0.655 | 4 | 3.74 | 0.009 | 4 | 5.04 | 0.001 | 4 | 4.24 | 0.004 | 4 | 6.15 | <0.001 | 4 | 3.56 | 0.011 |
Fig.1
Monthly average soil temperature (A) and water content (B) under different organic fertilizer and biochar treatments Some soil water content data was lost due to the instrument failure. Different letters at the same date indicate significant differences between treatments (P≤0.05), and points with no letters are not significantly different. M0, M3, and M9 represent organic fertilizer levels of 0, 3, and 9 t·hm?2, respectively; B0, B2.5, and B10 represent 0, 2.5, and 10 t·hm?2 biochar levels."
Fig.2
Soil enzyme activities in different treatments after two years of soil biochar and manure amendments The data are means ± SE, and bars with different letters indicate significantly different (P ≤ 0. 05). M0, M3, and M9 represent organic fertilizer levels of 0, 3, and 9 t·hm−2, respectively; B0, B2.5, and B10 represent 0, 2.5, and 10 t·hm−2 biochar levels."
Fig.3
The density loss of surface and mineral stakes with all soil treatments combined (A); mineral (B), and surface (C) stake density loss of each species under different soil treatments Data are means± SE, and different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). M0, M3, and M9 represent organic fertilizer levels of 0, 3, and 9 t·hm−2, respectively; B0, B2.5, and B10 represent 0, 2.5, and 10 t·hm−2 biochar levels."
Table 3
The main effects and interactions of manure and biochar on the density loss and moisture content of wood stakes of different locations and wood species"
方差来源 Source of variation | 密度损失 Density loss | 含水量 Moisture content | |||||
df | F | P | df | F | P | ||
表面毛白杨Surface Populus tomentosa | |||||||
有机肥 Manure (M) | 2 | 6.78 | 0.050 | 2 | 0.62 | 0.588 | |
生物炭 Biochar (B) | 2 | 4.35 | 0.016 | 2 | 4.51 | 0.014 | |
M × B | 4 | 6.99 | <0.001 | 4 | 3.37 | 0.013 | |
美洲山杨 Populus tremuloides | |||||||
M | 2 | 8.68 | 0.103 | 2 | 0.17 | 0.852 | |
B | 2 | 18.41 | <0.001 | 2 | 7.42 | 0.001 | |
M × B | 4 | 10.37 | <0.001 | 4 | 3.01 | 0.022 | |
火炬松 Pinus taeda | |||||||
M | 2 | 12.18 | 0.009 | 2 | 0.09 | 0.915 | |
B | 2 | 22.40 | <0.001 | 2 | 5.65 | 0.005 | |
M × B | 4 | 69.31 | <0.001 | 4 | 5.03 | 0.001 | |
土壤内毛白杨Mineral Populus tomentosa | |||||||
M | 2 | 5.19 | 0.007 | 2 | 1.28 | 0.351 | |
B | 2 | 1.78 | 0.174 | 2 | 3.15 | 0.048 | |
M × B | 4 | 12.49 | <0.001 | 4 | 10.52 | <0.001 | |
美洲山杨Populus tremuloides | |||||||
M | 2 | 0.54 | 0.587 | 2 | 9.91 | <0.001 | |
B | 2 | 0.71 | 0.495 | 2 | 2.14 | 0.123 | |
M × B | 4 | 1.50 | 0.208 | 4 | 5.37 | <0.001 | |
火炬松 Pinus taeda | |||||||
M | 2 | 2.81 | 0.133 | 2 | 0.86 | 0.425 | |
B | 2 | 45.46 | <0.001 | 2 | 1.28 | 0.284 | |
M × B | 4 | 70.07 | <0.001 | 4 | 0.92 | 0.456 |
Fig.4
Surface and mineral stake moisture content under all soil treatments ( A ); mineral ( B ), and surface ( C ) stake moisture content under different soil treatments Data are means ± SE, and different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05). M0, M3, and M9 represent organic fertilizer levels of 0, 3, and 9 t·hm−2, respectively; B0, B2.5, and B10 represent 0, 2.5, and 10 t·hm−2 biochar levels."
关松荫. 1986. 土壤酶及其研究法. 北京: 农业出版社. | |
Guan S Y. 1986. Soil enzyme and its research approaches. Beijing: Agriculture Press. [in Chinese] | |
国家林业和草原局. 2019. 中国森林资源报告(2014-2018). 北京: 中国林业出版社. | |
National Forestry and Grassland Administration. 2019. China forest resources report (2014-2018). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. [in Chinese] | |
胡文杰, 庞宏东, 胡兴宜, 等. 竹林密度和施肥种类对幕阜山区毛竹笋产量和品质及土壤理化性质的影响. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (12): 32- 42. | |
Hu W J, Pang H D, Hu X Y, et al. Effects of bamboo forest density and fertilizer types on the yield and quality of Phyllostachys edulis bamboo shoots and soil physicochemical properties in Mufu mountain area . Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (12): 32- 42. | |
刘 勇, 王巍伟, 李国雷, 等. 2015. 一种研究森林土壤有机质分解的新方法. 北京市: CN103149343B, 2015-05-13. | |
Liu Y, Wang W W, Li G L, et al. 2015. A new method about the decomposition of forest soil organic matter. Beijing: CN103149343B, 2015-05-13. [in Chinese] | |
王文波, 王延平, 王华田, 等. 杨树人工林连作与轮作对土壤氮素细菌类群和氮素代谢的影响. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (5): 45- 54. | |
Wang W B, Wang Y P, Wang H T, et al. Effects of different continuous cropping and rotation of poplar plantation on soil nitrogen bacteria community and nitrogen metabolism. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (5): 45- 54. | |
王 凯, 刘 勇, 赵蕊蕊, 等. 生物炭和有机肥对毛白杨人工林土壤氮矿化的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50 (10): 61- 68. | |
Wang K, Liu Y, Zhao R R, et al. Effects of biochar and organic fertilizer on soil nitrogen mineralization in Populus tomentosa plantation . Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2022, 50 (10): 61- 68. | |
殷丹阳, 罗洁文, 邱云霄, 等. 生物炭改良林地土壤研究进展. 世界林业研究, 2016, 29 (6): 23- 28. | |
Yin D Y, Luo J W, Qiu Y X, et al. Research advance on biochar in soil improvement. World Forestry Research, 2016, 29 (6): 23- 28. | |
杨承栋. 发展有群落结构混交林是维护、恢复和提高森林土壤功能实现人工林可持续经营的关键技术. 林业科学, 2022, 58 (8): 26- 40. | |
Yang C D. Development mixed forest with community structure is the key technologies to maintain, restore, and improve the functions of forest soil and to achieve the sustainable management of plantation. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58 (8): 26- 40. | |
杨承栋. 我国人工林土壤有机质的量和质下降是制约林木生长的关键因子. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (12): 1- 12. | |
Yang C. Decline of quantity and quality of soil organic matter is the key factor restricting the growth of plantation in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (12): 1- 12. | |
Adams M B, Jurgensen M, Palik B, et al. Wood stake decomposition twenty years after organic matter removal at the Lake States LTSP sites. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 496, 119456.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119456 |
|
Ai C, Zhang S Q, Zhang X, et al. Distinct responses of soil bacterial and fungal communities to changes in fertilization regime and crop rotation. Geoderma, 2018, 319, 156- 166.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.010 |
|
Berg B, McClaugherty C, 2003. Plant Litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Berlin: Springer. | |
Bhattacharyya S S, Ros G H, Furtak K, et al. Soil carbon sequestration – an interplay between soil microbial community and soil organic matter dynamics. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 815, 152928.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.152928 |
|
Bradford M A, Maynard D S, Crowther T W, et al. Belowground community turnover accelerates the decomposition of standing dead wood. Ecology, 2021, 102 (11): e03484.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.3484 |
|
Cha S, Chae H M, Lee S H, et al. Branch wood decomposition of tree species in a deciduous temperate forest in Korea. Forests, 2017, 8 (5): 176.
doi: 10.3390/f8050176 |
|
Cline L C, Schilling J S, Menke J, et al. Ecological and functional effects of fungal endophytes on wood decomposition. Functional Ecology, 2017, 32 (1): 181- 191. | |
Criscuoli I, Ventura M, Wiedner K, et al. Stability of woodchips biochar and impact on soil carbon stocks: results from a two-year field experiment. Forests, 2021, 12 (10): 1350.
doi: 10.3390/f12101350 |
|
Elzobair K A, Stromberger M E, Ippolito J A, et al. Contrasting effects of biochar versus manure on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in an Aridisol. Chemosphere, 2016, 142, 145- 152.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.044 |
|
Finér L, Jurgensen M, Palviainen M, et al. Does clear-cut harvesting accelerate initial wood decomposition? A five-year study with standard wood material. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 372, 10- 18.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.060 |
|
Gottschall F, Cesarz S, Auge H, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of abiotic and biotic properties explain biodiversity-ecosystem-functioning relationships. Ecological Monographs, 2022, 92 (1): e01490.
doi: 10.1002/ecm.1490 |
|
Hu Z H, Michaletz S T, Johnson D J, et al. Traits drive global wood decomposition rates more than climate. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24 (11): 5259- 5269.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14357 |
|
Janzen H, Janzen D, Gregorich E, 2021. The ‘soil health’ metaphor: illuminating or illusory? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 159: 108167. | |
Jaroszewicz B, Cholewińska O, Chećko E, et al. Predictors of diversity of deadwood-dwelling macrofungi in a European natural forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 490, 119123.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119123 |
|
Jurgensen M, Reed D, Page-Dumroese D S, et al. Wood strength loss as a measure of decomposition in northern forest mineral soil. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, 42 (1): 23- 31.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2005.09.001 |
|
Kaye J, Hart S. Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1997, 12 (4): 139- 143.
doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01001-X |
|
Kong J Q, He Z B, Chen L F, et al. Elevational variability in and controls on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition in alpine forests. Ecosphere, 2022, 13 (4): e4010.
doi: 10.1002/ecs2.4010 |
|
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff P B, Christensen R H B, 2017. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13): 1 - 26. | |
Lehmann J, Rillig M C, Thies J, et al. Biochar effects on soil biota – a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43 (9): 1812- 1836.
doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 |
|
Lenth R V, Buerkner P, Herve M, et al. 2022. Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. In: R package version 1.7. 5. | |
Lentz R D, Ippolito A A, Lehrsch G A, 2019. Biochar, manure, and sawdust alter long-term water retention dynamics in degraded soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 83: 1491-1501. | |
Li J, Wen Y C, Li X H, et al. Soil labile organic carbon fractions and soil organic carbon stocks as affected by long-term organic and mineral fertilization regimes in the North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 175, 281- 290.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.08.008 |
|
Li L D, Long A, Fossum B, et al. Effects of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on biochar characteristics pertinent to soil carbon and soil health: A meta-analysis. Soil Use and Management, 2022, 39 (1): 43- 52. | |
Martins N P, Fuchslueger L, Fleischer K, et al. Fine roots stimulate nutrient release during early stages of leaf litter decomposition in a Central Amazon rainforest. Plant and Soil, 2021, 469 (1/2): 287- 303. | |
Middleton T E, McCombs A L, Gailans S R, et al. Assessing biological soil health through decomposition of inexpensive household items. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 168, 104699. | |
Page-Dumroese D S, Sanchez F G, Udawatta R P, et al. 2021a. Soil healthassessment of forest soils.//Karlen D, Stott D E, Mikha M M. Soil health series John Wiley & Sons, Inc. | |
Page-Dumroese D S, Jurgensen M F, Miller C A, et al. Decomposition of wood stakes in the Pacific Northwest after soil compaction and organic matter removal. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021b, 494, 119362.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119362 |
|
Palviainen M, Aaltonen H, Laurén A, et al. Biochar amendment increases tree growth in nutrient-poor, young Scots pine stands in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 474, 118362.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118362 |
|
Perez S B, Fraterrigo J M, Dalling J W, 2021. Interspecific wood trait variation predicts decreased carbon residence time in changing forests. Functional Ecology, 36(3): 674-685. | |
Pingree M R A, Kardol P, Nilsson M C, et al. No evidence that conifer biochar impacts soil functioning by serving as microbial refugia in boreal soils. GCB Bioenergy, 2022, 14, 972- 988.
doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12978 |
|
Qu Z L, Li X L, Ge Y, et al. The impact of biochar on wood-inhabiting bacterial community and its function in a boreal pine forest. Environmental Microbiome, 2022, 17, 45.
doi: 10.1186/s40793-022-00439-9 |
|
R Core Team, 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing // R Core Team. URL http://www.R-project.org/ | |
Ren H, Warnock D D, Tiemann L K, et al. Evaluating foliar characteristics as early indicators of plant response to biochar amendments. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021b, 489, 119047.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119047 |
|
Ren J H, Liu X L, Yang W P, et al. Rhizosphere soil properties, microbial community, and enzyme activities: Short-term responses to partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021a, 299, 113650.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113650 |
|
Risch A C, Page-Dumroese D S, Schweiger A K, et al. Controls of initial wood decomposition on and in forest soils using standard material. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2022, 5, 829810.
doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.829810 |
|
Russell M B, Fraver S, Aakala T, et al. Quantifying carbon stores and decomposition in dead wood: a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 2015, 350, 107- 128.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.033 |
|
Seyedsadr S, Sipek V, Jacka L, et al. Biochar considerably increases the easily available water and nutrient content in low-organic soils amended with compost and manure. Chemosphere, 2022, 293, 133586.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133586 |
|
Shorohova E, Kapitsa E, Vanha-Majamaa I. Decomposition of stumps in a chronosequence after clear-felling vs. clear-felling with prescribed burning in a southern boreal forest in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255 (10): 3606- 3612.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.042 |
|
Somerville P D, Farrell C, May P B, et al. Biochar and compost equally improve urban soil physical and biological properties and tree growth, with no added benefit in combination. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 706, 135736.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135736 |
|
Viotti C, Bach C, Maillard F, et al. Sapwood and heartwood affect differentially bacterial and fungal community structure and successional dynamics during Quercus petraea decomposition . Environmental Microbiome, 2021, 23 (10): 6177- 6193.
doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15522 |
|
Wang F L, Wang X X, Song N N. Biochar and vermicompost improve the soil properties and the yield and quality of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. ) grown in plastic shed soil continuously cropped for different years . Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, 315, 107425.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107425 |
|
Wang W W, Lindner D L, Jusino M A, et al. Wood-colonizing fungal community response to forest restoration thinnings in a Pinus tabuliformis plantation in northern China . Forest Ecology and Management, 2020, 476, 118459.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118459 |
|
Wang W W, Page-Dumroese D S, Jurgensen M, et al. Restoration thinning impacts surface and belowground wood decomposition. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 449, 117451.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117451 |
|
Wang W W, Page-Dumroese D S, Jurgensen M, et al. Effect of forest thinning and wood quality on the short-term wood decomposition rate in a Pinus tabuliformis plantation . Journal of Plant Research, 2018, 131 (6): 897- 905.
doi: 10.1007/s10265-018-1069-y |
|
Yang Q, Zhou H W, Bartocci P, et al. Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China's 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Nature Communications, 2021, 12 (1): 1698.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21868-z |
|
Yu M J, Liang S J, Dai Z M, et al. Plant material and its biochar differ in their effects on nitrogen mineralization and nitrification in a subtropical forest soil. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 763, 143048.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143048 |
|
Zhang J, Amonette J E, Flury M, 2021. Effect of biochar and biochar particle size on plant-available water of sand, silt loam, and clay soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 212: 104992. | |
Zhao R R, Liu Y, Gundale M J. Soil amendment with biochar and manure alters wood stake decomposition and fungal community composition. GCB Bioenergy, 2023, 15 (9): 1166- 1185.
doi: 10.1111/gcbb.13087 |
|
Zhao R R, Liu Y, Page-Dumroese D S, et al. Enhancing soil quality of short rotation forest operations using biochar and manure. Forests, 2022, 13 (12): 2090.
doi: 10.3390/f13122090 |
|
Zhong Y Q W, Yan W M, Wang R W, et al. Differential responses of litter decomposition to nutrient addition and soil water availability with long-term vegetation recovery. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2017, 53 (8): 939- 949.
doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1242-9 |
|
Zimmerman J K, Pulliam W M, Lodge D J, et al. Nitrogen immobilization by decomposing woody debris and the recovery of tropical wet forest from hurricane damage. Oikos, 1995, 72 (3): 314- 322.
doi: 10.2307/3546116 |
[1] | Jiaming Wan,Jiang Lü,Yun Shi,Hang Xu,Zhiqiang Zhang. Effects of Diffuse Radiation on the Gross Primary Productivity of a Poplar Plantation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(5): 1-10. |
[2] | Yanlin Zhang,Caifeng Huang,Mingzhuo Bao,Chuifan Zhou,Zongming He. Effects of Biochar and Its Aging Biochar on Soils Nutrients and Microbial Community Composition in Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantations: a Laboratory Simulation Experiment [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(6): 169-179. |
[3] | Yanyan Ju,Yuanjun Ding,Qianqian Shao,Xiaochun Zhang,Hongyan Gao,Mengying Lian,Rongjun Bian,Xiaoming Wang,Genxing Pan. Properties and Application Potential of Biochar from Urban Green Wastes [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(8): 107-120. |
[4] | Hu Huaying, Zhang Hong, Cao Sheng, Yin Danyang, Zhou Chuifan, He Zongming. Effects of Biochar Application on Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Diversity in Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55(8): 184-193. |
[5] | Lei Haidi, Yin Yunfeng, Zhang Peng, Wan Xiaohua, Ma Hongliang, Gao Ren, Yang Yusheng. Impacts of Biochar Input on Soil Carbon Emission and Microbial Community Composition in Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 37-44. |
[6] | Wang Wenbo, Wang Yanping, Wang Huatian, Ma Xuesong, Yi Wenhui. Effects of Different Continuous Cropping and Rotation of Poplar Plantation on Soil Nitrogen Bacteria Community and Nitrogen Metabolism [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 45-54. |
[7] | Xu Tan, Wang Huatian, Zhu Wanrui, Wang Yanping, Li Chuanrong, Jiang Yuezhong. Morphological and Anatomical Traits of Poplar Fine Roots in Successive Rotation Plantations [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(1): 119-126. |
[8] | Fu Jianping, Lan Zaiping, Sun Shangwei, Liu Junqin, Zhang Yong. Soil Water Movement in a Poplar Plantation under Drip Irrigation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(6): 25-29. |
[9] | Wang Jing;Liang Jun;Jiao Yijie;Zhang Xingyao. Relationships between Neighborhood Comparison of Short-Rotation Poplar Plantations and Canker Disease Incidence [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(11): 57-62. |
[10] | Tian Liu;Ren Guifang;Li Yong;Guo Minwei;Piao Chungen. Investigation on Microflora of Poplar Plantations in Beijing [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(3): 80-88. |
[11] | Liu Fude;Jiang Yuezhong;Wang Huatian;Wang Ying;Kong Linggang. Soil Productivity Maintenance Technique of Poplar Plantation under Continuous Cropping [J]. , 2007, 43(zk): 58-64. |
[12] | Zhu Chunquan;Lei Jingpin;Liu Xiaodong;Wang Fuguo;Cheng Guizhen. THE DISTRIBUTION AND SEASONAL CHANGE OF LEAF AREA IN POPLAR PLANTATIONS MANAGED IN DIFFERENT WAYS [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001, 37(1): 46-51. |
[13] | Zhu Chunquan;Lei Jingpin;Liu Xiaodong;Cheng Guizheng;Li Baodong. CROWN STRUCTURE OF POPLAR TREES IN INTENSIVE AND EXTENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLANTATIONS [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2000, 36(2): 60-68. |
[14] | Fucheng Bao,Shengqua Lui,Zehui Jiang. MODELING WOOD PROPERTIES IN RELATION TO CAMBIUM AGE AND GROWTH RATE IN POPLAR PLANTATION [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1999, 35(1): 77-82. |
[15] | Shiji Wang,Yarong Liu,Gangying Hui,Guoyou Leng,Shuli Zhou. A STUDY ON THE SOIL MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR POPLAR PLANTATION IN HUAIBEI COAL MINE COLLAPSED AREA [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1996, 32(5): 411-418. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||