Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2022, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 98-110.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20220111
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yu Bai1,2,Yong Pang1,2,*,Xiaoyun Xia1,3,Weiwei Jia4
Received:
2021-02-18
Online:
2022-01-25
Published:
2022-03-08
Contact:
Yong Pang
CLC Number:
Yu Bai,Yong Pang,Xiaoyun Xia,Weiwei Jia. 3-PG Model Parameterization Using Destructive Sampling Data of Larix olgensis[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2022, 58(1): 98-110.
Table 1
The information of destructive sampling plots"
样地号 Plot ID | 林班号 Compartment ID | 小班号 Sub-compartmentID | 树龄 Age/a | 面积 Area/hm2 | 立地指数 Site index | 株数 Stem number/hm-2 | 平均胸径 Mean DBH/cm | 平均树高 Meanheight/m | 蓄积量 Volume/(m3·hm-2) |
LYS720 | 64 | 11 | 52 | 0.06 | 21.48 | 642 | 24.82 | 26.67 | 337.62 |
LYS03 | 68 | 13 | 37 | 0.06 | 23.06 | 1 017 | 19.81 | 23.92 | 370.47 |
LYS04 | 81 | 2 | 36 | 0.06 | 26.22 | 1 100 | 18.59 | 22.35 | 324.16 |
LYS13 | 70 | 5 | 22 | 0.06 | 21.94 | 1 167 | 13.21 | 15.65 | 191.64 |
LYS14 | 70 | 5 | 35 | 0.06 | 21.85 | 1 467 | 13.82 | 16.02 | 198.77 |
LYS15 | 70 | 5 | 21 | 0.06 | 22.32 | 1 167 | 14.37 | 16.20 | 153.40 |
Table 2
3-PG model physiological parameters identified in this study"
类型Type | 参数Parameters | 参数值Value | 来源Source |
异速生长关系与分配 Allometric relationships and partitioning | 胸径2 cm时叶与干生物量分配比 Foliage∶stem partitioning ratio at DBH = 2 cm | 0.8 | 拟合 Fitting |
胸径20 cm时叶与干生物量分配 比Foliage∶stem partitioning ratio at DBH = 20 cm | 0.6 | 拟合 Fitting | |
干生物量与胸径关系中常数 Constant in the stem biomass v. diam. relationship | 0.032 52 | ||
干生物量与胸径关系中指数 Power in the stem biomass v. diam. relationship | 2.742 6 | ||
初级生产力分配给根最大值 Maximum fraction of NPP to roots | 0.5 | 拟合 Fitting | |
初级生产力分配给根最小值 Minimum fraction of NPP to roots | 0.15 | 拟合 Fitting | |
凋落物与根更新 Litterfall and root turnover | 最大凋落物速率 Maximum litterfall rate | 0.06 | 拟合 Fitting |
根月平均凋落速率 Mean monthly root turnover rate | 0.005 | 拟合 Fitting | |
生长调节 Growth modifier | 生长最低温度 Minimum temperature for growth | -2 | |
生长最适温度 Optimum temperature for growth | 17 | ||
生长最高温度 Maximum temperature for growth | 38 | ||
植物生长最大林龄 Maximum stand age used in age modifier | 100 | 拟合 Fitting | |
树干死亡与自疏 Stem mortality and self-thinning | 最大林龄的死亡率 Mortality rate for large tree age | 0.6 | 计算 Calculation |
在1 000株·hm-2每株树最大树干质量 Max. stem mass per tree @ 1 000 trees·hm-2 | 240 | 计算 Calculation | |
林分郁闭年龄 Age at full canopy cover | 15 | 拟合 Fitting | |
冠层电导 Conductance | 冠层量子效率 Canopy quantum efficiency | 0.05 | 拟合 Fitting |
Table 3
Different data types used in accuracy test"
数据类型 Data type | 数据来源 Data source | 数据获取时间 Data acquisition time | 数据特点 Data characteristics |
解析木数据 Destructive sampling data | 6块解析木样地 Six destructive sampling plots | 2019年 Observed in 2019 | 模拟连年观测数据,用于标定模型 Used to simulate continuous observation data and calibrate model |
密度林数据 Continuous observation data | 5块密度林样地 5 continuous observation plots | 1975—2020年 Observed from 1975 to 2020 | 覆盖林龄较广,检验大时间跨度预测精度 Covered a wide range of stand age, used to verify the prediction accuracy of large time span |
固定样地数据 Fixed plot data | 24块固定样地 24 fixed plots | 2012、2014、2016和2020年 Observed in 2012,2014,2016 and 2020 | 覆盖地理范围广,检验大区域范围预测精度 Covered a wide spatial range, used to verify the prediction accuracy of large area |
Table 4
Validation between destructive sampling data and simulated data"
统计量 Statistic value | R2 | 斜率 Slope | 截距 Intercept | ME | MAE | RMSE | MRE(%) |
胸径DBH/cm | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.19 | -0.12 | 0.57 | 0.27 | -0.81 |
叶干生物量比Foliage∶stem bionass ratio | 0.91 | 1.20 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.05 | -7.08 |
干生物量Stem biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.93 | 1.10 | 1.29 | 10.63 | 11.78 | 2.51 | 11.01 |
根生物量Root biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.83 | 0.75 | 10.36 | 3.38 | 4.21 | 1.41 | 12.29 |
总生物量Total biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.93 | 0.90 | 15.48 | 1.49 | 9.43 | 0.94 | 1.06 |
蓄积量Volume/(m3·hm-2) | 0.93 | 1.12 | -38.27 | -11.48 | 19.20 | 2.61 | -5.15 |
Table 5
Validation between continuous observation data and simulated data"
统计量 Statistic value | R2 | 斜率break/>Slope | 截距break/>Intercept | ME | MAE | RMSE | MRE(%) |
胸径DBH/cm | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.16 | -0.29 | 0.43 | 0.53 | -1.93 |
叶干生物量比Foliage∶stem bionass ratio | 0.81 | 0.98 | -0.02 | -0.02 | 0.02 | 0.14 | -36.56 |
干生物量Stem biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.95 | 1.22 | -7.73 | 13.91 | 14.28 | 3.64 | 14.00 |
根生物量Root biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.85 | 0.71 | 8.43 | 0.38 | 3.28 | 0.60 | 1.36 |
总生物量Total biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.71 | -2.30 | 8.92 | 1.48 | -1.57 |
蓄积量Volume/(m3·hm-2) | 0.94 | 1.20 | -63.79 | -15.67 | 23.99 | 3.86 | -6.47 |
Table 6
Validation between fixed plot data and simulated data"
统计量 Statistic value | R2 | 斜率 Slope | 截距 Intercept | ME | MAE | RMSE | MRE(%) |
胸径DBH/cm | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.19 | -0.12 | 0.57 | 0.27 | -0.81 |
叶干生物量比值Foliage∶stem bionass ratio | 0.91 | 1.20 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.05 | -7.08 |
干生物量Stem biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.93 | 1.10 | 1.29 | 10.63 | 11.78 | 2.51 | 11.01 |
根生物量Root biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.83 | 0.75 | 10.36 | 3.38 | 4.21 | 1.41 | 12.29 |
总生物量Total biomass/(t·hm-2) | 0.93 | 0.90 | 15.48 | 1.49 | 9.43 | 0.94 | 1.06 |
蓄积量Volume/(m3·hm-2) | 0.93 | 1.12 | -38.27 | -11.48 | 19.20 | 2.61 | -5.15 |
董利虎, 李凤日, 贾炜玮, 等. 2019. 长白落叶松人工林立木生物量及含碳量计量方法: DB23/T 2333—2019. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江省市场监督管理局. | |
Dong L H, Li F R, Jia W W, et al. 2019. Measurement method of standing biomass and carbon content of Larix olgensis plantation: DB23/T 2333—2019. Harbin: Administration for Market Regulation of Heilongjiang Province. [in Chinese] | |
郭明春, 刘建锋. 杉木人工林林分生长模拟. 福建林学院学报, 2011, 31 (1): 65- 68.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2011.01.013 |
|
Guo M C , Liu J F . Modeling the stand growth of Chinese fir plantations. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2011, 31 (1): 65- 68.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2011.01.013 |
|
凌向明, 陈昭. 浅析森林经营管理对森林碳汇的作用和影响. 低碳世界, 2019, 9 (3): 298- 300.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2066.2019.03.180 |
|
Ling X M , Chen Z . The analysis of forest management function and influence on forest carbon sink. Low-Carbon World, 2019, 9 (3): 298- 300.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2066.2019.03.180 |
|
马华文, 许翠清, 李海朝. 立地条件对长白落叶松光合特性的影响. 东北林业大学学报, 2008, 36 (8): 4- 7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2008.08.002 |
|
Ma H W , Xu C Q , Li H C . Photosynthesis characteristics of Larix olgensis under different site conditions. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2008, 36 (8): 4- 7.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2008.08.002 |
|
孟宪宇. 测树学. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2006. | |
Meng X Y . Forest measurement. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2006. | |
孙志虎. 2005. 长白落叶松人工用材林长期生产力维持的研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学. | |
Sun Z H. 2005. Study on long-term productivity maintenance of artificial timber stand of Larix olgensis. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University. [in Chinese] | |
夏晓运, 庞勇, 黄庆丰, 等. 基于3-PG模型的长白落叶松生物量生长预测. 林业科学, 2021, 57 (3): 67- 78. | |
Xia X Y , Pang Y , Huang Q F , et al. Prediction of biomass growth Larix olgensis based on 3-PG model. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57 (3): 67- 78. | |
解雅麟, 王海燕, 雷相东. 基于过程模型的气候变化对长白落叶松人工林净初级生产力的影响. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41 (8): 826- 839. | |
Xie Y L , Wang H Y , Lei X D . Effects of climate change on net primary productivity in Larix olgensis plantations based on process modeling. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41 (8): 826- 839. | |
许晨璐, 孙晓梅, 张守攻. 日本落叶松与长白落叶松及其杂种光合特性比较. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34 (4): 62- 66. | |
Xu C L , Sun X M , Zhang S G . Comparison in photosynthetic characteristics of Larix kaempferi, L. olgensis and their hybrids. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2012, 36 (8): 4- 7. | |
赵梅芳, 项文化, 田大伦, 等. 基于3-PG模型的湖南会同杉木人工林蒸发散估算. 湖南农业科学, 2008, (3): 158- 162.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2008.03.057 |
|
Zhao M F , Xiang W H , Tian D L , et al. Simulating evapotranspiration of Chinese fir plantation in Huitong, Hunan using the 3-PG. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2008, (3): 158- 162.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2008.03.057 |
|
Coops N C , Waring R H , Landsberg J J . Assessing forest productivity in Australia and New Zealand using a physiologically-based model driven with averaged monthly weather data and satellite-derived estimates of canopy photosynthetic capacity. Forest Ecology and Management, 1998, 104 (1/3): 113- 127. | |
Coops N C , Waring R H , Beverly E L . Assessing the past and future distribution and productivity of ponderosa pine in the Pacific northwest using a process model, 3-PG. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 183 (1): 107- 124. | |
Dye P J , Jacobs S , Drew D . Verification of 3-PG growth and water-use predictions in twelve Eucalyptus plantation stands in Zululand, South Africa. Forest Ecology & Management, 2004, 193 (1/2): 197- 218. | |
Esprey L J , Sands P J , Smith C W . Understanding 3-PG using a sensitivity analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 193, 235- 250.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.032 |
|
Forrester D I , Tang X . Analysing the spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests and the effects of stand density using the 3-PG model. Ecological Modelling, 2015, 319, 233- 254. | |
Gonzalez-Benecke C A , Jokela E J , Cropper W P , et al. Parameterization of the 3-PG model for Pinus elliottii stands using alternative methods to estimate fertility rating, biomass partitioning and canopy closure. Forest Ecology & Management, 2014, 327, 55- 75. | |
Gupta R , Sharma L K . The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: a review. Ecological Modelling, 2019, 397, 55- 73.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.01.007 |
|
Landsberg J J , Waring R H . A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitoning. Forest Ecology and Management, 1997, 95 (3): 209- 228.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1 |
|
Landsberg J J , Waring R H , Coops N C . Performance of the forest productivity model 3-PG applied to a wide range of forest types. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 172 (2): 199- 214. | |
López-Serrano F R , Martínez-García E , Dadi T , et al. Biomass growth simulations in a natural mixed forest stand under different thinning intensities by 3-PG process-based model. European Journal of Forest Research, 2015, 134 (1): 167- 185.
doi: 10.1007/s10342-014-0841-3 |
|
Rodríguez R , Espinosa M , Real P , et al. Analysis of productivity of radiata pine plantations under different silvicultural regimes using the 3-PG process-based model. Australian Forestry, 2002, 65 (3): 165- 172.
doi: 10.1080/00049158.2002.10674869 |
|
Sands P J . Adaptation of 3-PG to novel species: guidelines for data collection ad parameter assignment. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Production Forestry and CSIRO. Technical Report, 2004, 141, 34. | |
Sands P J , Landsberg J J . Parameterisation of 3-PG for plantation grown Eucalyptus globulus. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 163, 273- 292.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00586-2 |
|
Santosh S , Thomas F , Randolph W . Determination of fertility rating (FR) in the 3-PG model for loblolly pine plantations in the southeastern United States based on site index. Forests, 2015, 33 (6): 256- 262. | |
Song X , Bryan B A , Almeida A C , et al. Time-dependent sensitivity of a process-based ecological model. Ecological Modelling, 2013, 65, 114- 123. | |
Wei L , John M , Zhang J W , et al. 3-PG simulations of young ponderosa pine plantations under varied management intensity: why do they grow so differently?. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 313, 69- 82.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.035 |
|
Xie Y L , Wang H Y , Lei X D . Application of the 3-PG model to predict growth of Larix olgensis plantations in northeastern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2017, 406, 208- 218.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.018 |
[1] | Hailian Xue,Xianglin Tian,Tianjian Cao. Optimizing Parameters of a Process-Based Model for Pinus armandii: A Compromise between Empirical and Process-Based Modelling Approaches [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(9): 21-33. |
[2] | Xiaoyun Xia,Yong Pang,Qingfeng Huang,Rong Wu,Dongsheng Chen,Yu Bai. Prediction of Biomass Growth of Larix olgensis Based on 3-PG Model [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(3): 67-78. |
[3] | Yefan Cao,Laifa Wang,Xizhuo Wang,Jiehong Fan. Pathogenicity of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus to Larix olgensis Seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(11): 108-115. |
[4] | Song Yue, Li Shujuan, Zhang Hanguo, Bai Xiaoming, Bi Xianyu, Dong Shiwei, Dong Hao. Establishment and Optimization of Embryogenic Callus Suspension Culture System of Larix [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(7): 146-154. |
[5] | Jiang Dun, Xue Yi, Xu Zhiwen, Wang Jiabing, Meng Zhaojun, Yan Shanchun. Effects of Induced-Resistance of Larix olgensis by Sbraying Jasmonic Acid on Growth and Development of Lymantria dispar [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(1): 162-167. |
[6] | Gao Huilin, Dong Lihu, Li Fengri. Crown Shape Model for Larix olgensis Plantation Based on Mixed Effect [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(3): 84-93. |
[7] | Cui Shimeng, Xiang Wei. Effects of Thinning and Climate Factors on Larix olgensis Tree-Ring Width [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2017, 53(12): 1-11. |
[8] | Song Yue, Zhen Cheng, Zhang Hanguo, Li Shujuan. Embryogenic Callus Induction and Somatic Embryogenesis from Immature Zygotic Embryos of Larix olgensis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(10): 45-54. |
[9] | Shouzheng Tang,Jishan Du. COMPATIBLE DYNAMIC MODEL STUDIES ON COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION OF DIAMETER FOR THINNED AND UNTHINNED EVEN-AGED STANDS [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1998, 34(2): 17-24. |
[10] | Shuli Wang,Daxing Liu,Chongqi Zhong. A STUDY ON THE DENSITY CONTROLLING TECHNIQUE OF LARIX OLGENSIS INDUSTRIAL PLANTATION [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1997, 33(4): 321-329. |
[11] | Shuli Wang,Jisheng Wu,Congqi Zhong. STUDIES ON WOOD PROPERY AND PULP CHARACTERISTICS OF WOOD FROM LARIX OLGENSIS PULP PLANTATION [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1997, 33(3): 283-288. |
[12] | Kexian Wu,Wei Li,Miaozhen Xu,Changshun Dang,Yue Liu. STUDY ON TISSUE CULTURE OF LARIX OLGENSIS [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1996, 32(2): 125-133. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||