Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2021, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 93-107.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210509
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yuedong Guo1,2,3,Huiru Zhang1,3,*,Jun Lu1,3,Zhuohui Wang4
Received:
2019-08-13
Online:
2021-07-25
Published:
2021-07-09
Contact:
Huiru Zhang
CLC Number:
Yuedong Guo,Huiru Zhang,Jun Lu,Zhuohui Wang. Species Abundance Distribution of Spruce-Fir Broad-Leaved Tree Species Mixed Forest in Northern Slope of Changbai Mountain in China[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2021, 57(5): 93-107.
Table 1
Basic characteristics of the twelve sample plots"
样地 Sample plot | 林分密度 Stand density/ (tree·hm-2) | 树种组成 Tree species composition | 林分断面积 Basic area/m2 | 坡位 Slope position | 海拔 Elevation/m | 郁闭度 Canopy density |
1 | 934 | 2椴树2杂2冷杉1云杉1色木1红松1落叶松+枫桦 2TI2MT2FI1SP1MA1KP1LA+YB | 15.42 | 下Down | 742 | 0.60 |
2 | 1 224 | 3杂2椴树2色木1冷杉1红松1枫桦+落叶松+云杉-榆树3 MT2TI2MA1FI1KP1YB+LA+SP-EL | 15.26 | 中Middle | 752 | 0.70 |
3 | 1 233 | 3杂2椴树2冷杉1色木1落叶松1榆树+红松+枫桦+云杉 3MT2TI2FI1MA1LA1EL+KP+YB+SP | 16.87 | 中Middle | 760 | 0.71 |
4 | 1 167 | 3椴树2杂2冷杉1色木1红松1榆树+云杉+枫桦-落叶松 3TI2MT2FI1MA1KP1EL+SP+YB-LA | 17.20 | 上Up | 773 | 0.66 |
5 | 1 328 | 2椴树2色木2杂2冷杉1红松1云杉+枫桦+榆树-落叶松 2TI2MA2MT2FI1KP1SP+YB+EL-LA | 18.45 | 中Middle | 780 | 0.72 |
6 | 1 422 | 3冷杉2椴树2色木1杂1枫桦1红松+云杉+榆树+落叶松 3FI2TI2MA1MT1YB1KP+SP+EL+LA | 18.01 | 上Up | 792 | 0.73 |
7 | 1 540 | 4冷杉2椴树1杂1色木1红松1枫桦+榆树+落叶松+云杉 4FI2TI1MT1MA1KP1YB+EL+LA+SP | 18.60 | 上Up | 771 | 0.76 |
8 | 1 310 | 3冷杉1杂1椴树1枫桦1云杉1色木1红松1白桦+落叶松 3FI1MT1TI1YB1SP1MA1KP1WB+LA | 15.57 | 下Down | 732 | 0.75 |
9 | 1 438 | 4冷杉2椴树1红松1色木1杂1枫桦+云杉+落叶松+榆树+杨树 4FI2TI1KP1MA1MT1YB+SP+LA+EL+PO | 17.09 | 下Down | 749 | 0.71 |
10 | 1 195 | 2椴树2杂2冷杉1红松1云杉1枫桦1色木+落叶松+榆树+杨树 2TI2MT2FI1KP1SP1YB1MA+LA+EL+PO | 19.19 | 下Down | 759 | 0.76 |
11 | 1 301 | 3椴树2色木2冷杉1红松1榆树1云杉+水曲柳+杂+枫桦+落叶松 3TI2MA2FI1KP1EL1SP+AS+MT+YB+LA | 19.18 | 上Up | 769 | 0.65 |
12 | 1 437 | 2椴树2杂1色木1榆树1冷杉1红松1落叶松1云杉+枫桦+水曲柳 2TI2MT1MA1EL1SP1KP1LA1SP+YB+AS | 22.12 | 上Up | 773 | 0.73 |
Table 2
Empirical statistical model test of species abundance pattern"
样地 Sample plot | ls | ln | pl | ||||||||
χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | |||
1 | 5.39 | 0.40 | 162.14 | 6.99* | 0.30 | 159.10 | 7.14* | 0.30 | 159.21 | ||
2 | 3.46 | 0.60* | 143.53 | 0.01 | 0.60* | 129.84 | 0.02 | 0.60* | 129.82 | ||
3 | 2.70 | 0.60* | 156.34 | 15.95** | 0.40 | 153.38 | 9.69** | 0.40 | 152.67 | ||
4 | 2.74 | 0.60* | 154.48 | 12.54** | 0.40 | 152.12 | 7.64* | 0.40 | 151.51 | ||
5 | 3.78 | 0.50 | 154.22 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 143.46 | 0.96 | 0.40 | 143.36 | ||
6 | 2.57 | 0.36 | 169.17 | 7.94* | 0.36 | 171.53 | 5.53 | 0.36 | 171.26 | ||
7 | 4.05 | 0.45 | 162.73 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 155.58 | 0.34 | 0.36 | 155.64 | ||
8 | 1.46 | 0.54 | 163.47 | 4.62 | 0.36 | 167.61 | 3.04 | 0.36 | 167.22 | ||
9 | 1.13 | 0.42 | 158.09 | 6.79* | 0.42 | 160.62 | 4.69 | 0.41 | 160.37 | ||
10 | 1.85 | 0.50 | 162.21 | 5.73 | 0.30 | 161.24 | 3.51 | 0.30 | 160.92 | ||
11 | 4.17 | 0.55 | 164.65 | 0.03 | 0.45 | 151.31 | 0.55 | 0.45 | 150.88 | ||
12 | 1.30 | 0.45 | 171.84 | 8.90* | 0.36 | 173.76 | 6.50 | 0.36 | 173.51 |
Table 3
Biodiversity parameters of fitting species abundance model and alpha biodiversity parameters"
样地 Sample plot | T | λ | 个体数Number of individual | 胸高断面积Basal area | |||||||
Shannon- Wiener | Marglef | Simpson | Pielou | Shannon- Wiener | Marglef | Simpson | Pielou | ||||
1 | 1.94 | 3.39 | 2.24 | 2.04 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 2.14 | 1.67 | 0.85 | 0.79 | |
2 | 1.67 | 4.39 | 2.18 | 1.41 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 1.99 | 1.15 | 0.83 | 0.83 | |
3 | 2.03 | 3.92 | 2.22 | 1.69 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 1.91 | 1.36 | 0.81 | 0.75 | |
4 | 2.05 | 3.86 | 2.23 | 1.70 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 2.06 | 1.40 | 0.85 | 0.80 | |
5 | 1.82 | 4.30 | 2.24 | 1.53 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 2.04 | 1.26 | 0.84 | 0.82 | |
6 | 2.34 | 3.56 | 2.18 | 1.93 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 2.06 | 1.58 | 0.84 | 0.76 | |
7 | 1.95 | 4.13 | 2.12 | 1.64 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 1.99 | 1.35 | 0.82 | 0.78 | |
8 | 2.38 | 3.38 | 2.14 | 1.95 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 2.09 | 1.61 | 0.84 | 0.77 | |
9 | 2.15 | 3.55 | 1.96 | 1.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 1.86 | 1.51 | 0.76 | 0.71 | |
10 | 2.23 | 3.72 | 2.27 | 1.83 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 2.12 | 1.54 | 0.85 | 0.80 | |
11 | 2.01 | 4.23 | 2.29 | 1.67 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 2.10 | 1.42 | 0.84 | 0.82 | |
12 | 2.33 | 3.65 | 2.19 | 1.92 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 2.31 | 1.66 | 0.89 | 0.85 |
Table 4
Correlation analysis between biodiversity parameters and fitting parameters from empirical statistical models"
ls.T | ln.λ | Shannon- Wiener | Marglef | Simpson | Pielou | Shannon- Wiener.G | Marglef.G | Simpson.G | |
ln.λ | -0.76** | ||||||||
Shannon-Wiener | -0.18 | 0.29 | |||||||
Marglef | 0.77** | -0.94** | -0.06 | ||||||
Simpson | -0.29 | 0.37 | 0.96** | -0.21 | |||||
Pielou | -0.67* | 0.81** | 0.74* | -0.71** | 0.83** | ||||
Shannon-Wiener.G | 0.37 | -0.25 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.04 | |||
Marglef.G | 0.80** | -0.91** | -0.08 | 0.98** | -0.26 | -0.71** | 0.54 | ||
Simpson.G | 0.20 | -0.05 | 0.70** | 0.26 | 0.60* | 0.32 | 0.93** | 0.30 | |
Pielou.G | -0.28 | 0.46 | 0.65* | -0.27 | 0.58* | 0.64* | 0.72* | -0.18 | 0.81* |
Table 5
Niche model test of species abundance pattern"
样地 Sample plot | GS | RBS | Zipf | Mand | ONM | DPM | RAM | ||||||||||||||||||||
χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | χ2 | D | AIC | |||||||
1 | 2.16 | 0.10 | 5.36 | 1.92 | 0.10 | 3.36 | 9.96 | 0.25 | 14.35 | 2.50 | 0.10 | 8.70 | 6.50 | 0.20 | 4.12 | 7.00 | 0.50** | 10.99 | 16.00 | 0.50** | 4.70 | ||||||
2 | 6.33 | 0.10 | 6.70 | 6.83 | 0.15 | 4.70 | 9.00 | 0.11 | 10.29 | 6.33 | 0.10 | 8.70 | 3.25 | 0.10 | 6.58 | 8.00 | 0.30 | 12.24 | 26.00** | 0.45* | 9.56 | ||||||
3 | 4.00 | 0.16 | 3.82 | 7.50 | 0.10 | 4.70 | 8.00 | 0.24 | 9.55 | 4.00 | 0.16 | 5.82 | 2.25 | 0.10 | 4.12 | 3.00 | 0.30 | 13.35 | 25.00** | 0.30 | 9.56 | ||||||
4 | 3.67 | 0.20 | 5.36 | 3.25 | 0.11 | -5.10 | 10.39 | 0.24 | 15.69 | 3.91 | 0.20 | 8.70 | 2.00 | 0.10 | 5.41 | 19.00* | 0.30 | 10.99 | 25.00** | 0.30 | 9.56 | ||||||
5 | 6.33 | 0.17 | 8.93 | 5.33 | 0.26 | 3.36 | 13.00 | 0.24 | 13.86 | 6.33 | 0.17 | 10.93 | 1.03 | 0.10 | 9.03 | 3.00 | 0.20 | 14.11 | 29.00** | 0.26 | 10.65 | ||||||
6 | 7.00 | 0.09 | 8.58 | 3.91 | 0.09 | 0.96 | 7.66 | 0.19 | 13.63 | 7.00 | 0.09 | 10.57 | 2.78 | 0.14 | 8.58 | 7.00 | 0.45** | 11.74 | 19.00* | 0.45** | 8.11 | ||||||
7 | 4.33 | 0.18 | 4.65 | 1.83 | 0.18 | -3.50 | 6.41 | 0.27 | 13.04 | 4.33 | 0.18 | 6.65 | 0.75 | 0.09 | 2.65 | 6.00 | 0.27 | 8.58 | 17.00 | 0.27 | 4.79 | ||||||
8 | 21.16* | 0.18 | 19.09 | 13.17 | 0.18 | 15.25 | 21.25* | 0.19 | 21.82 | 21.16* | 0.27 | 22.66 | 7.55 | 0.21 | 4.12 | 37.00** | 0.27 | 14.74 | 41.00 | 0.27 | 15.50 | ||||||
9 | 8.00 | 0.22 | 9.27 | 4.67 | 0.19 | 0 | 4.80 | 0.17 | 7.27 | 7.00 | 0.17 | 10.12 | 4.13 | 0.22 | 7.11 | 14.00 | 0.42 | 10.17 | 17.00 | 0.42* | 6.72 | ||||||
10 | 4.00 | 0.30 | 5.36 | 7.83 | 0.10 | 5.88 | 22.50** | 0.34 | 18.56 | 4.00 | 0.30 | 7.36 | 4.46 | 0.20 | 1.84 | 4.00 | 0.40 | 12.53 | 22.00** | 0.40* | 8.33 | ||||||
11 | 1.17 | 0.09 | -9.13 | 1.50 | 0.19 | -11.12 | 0.67 | 0.18 | -6.66 | 1.16 | 0.09 | -7.13 | 2.33 | 0.12 | 4.12 | 10.00 | 0.27 | 11.04 | 23.00* | 0.32 | 8.11 | ||||||
12 | 7.00 | 0.27 | 10.58 | 4.67 | 0.19 | 4.12 | 8.67 | 0.18 | 14.20 | 9.00 | 0.18 | 19.25 | 5.13 | 0.21 | 8.58 | 28.00 | 0.36 | 14.74 | 31.00** | 0.36* | 12.73 |
Table 6
Neutral theory model test of species abundance pattern"
样地 Sample plot | J | MZSM | Volkov | ||||||||
θ | χ2 | D | AIC | θ | m | χ2 | D | AIC | |||
1 | 934 | 2.80 | 17.50* | 0.30 | 11.88 | 6.72 | 0.02 | 8.26 | 0.30 | 4.04 | |
2 | 1 224 | 1.98 | 27.50** | 0.42 | 14.99 | 4.01 | 0.01 | 14.95 | 0.60* | 10.83 | |
3 | 1 233 | 2.33 | 25.50** | 0.31 | 14.30 | 5.25 | 0.01 | 11.11 | 0.40 | 8.87 | |
4 | 1 167 | 2.35 | 15.00 | 0.31 | 11.88 | 5.31 | 0.01 | 10.07 | 0.40 | 8.47 | |
5 | 1 328 | 2.14 | 29.00** | 0.23 | 15.31 | 4.51 | 0.01 | 15.22 | 0.40 | 12.04 | |
6 | 1 422 | 2.57 | 19.50* | 0.28 | 11.62 | 6.00 | 0.01 | 7.37 | 0.36 | 3.79 | |
7 | 1 540 | 2.21 | 19.50* | 0.28 | 11.62 | 4.59 | 0.01 | 7.74 | 0.36 | 2.88 | |
8 | 1 310 | 2.60 | 43.50** | 0.27 | 20.66 | 6.78 | 0.01 | 17.14 | 0.45 | 16.18 | |
9 | 1 438 | 2.29 | 16.00 | 0.33 | 8.87 | 4.82 | 0.01 | 7.86 | 0.42 | 1.59 | |
10 | 1 195 | 2.52 | 21.00* | 0.21 | 11.88 | 5.94 | 0.01 | 9.18 | 0.30 | 7.42 | |
11 | 1 301 | 2.31 | 18.00 | 0.36 | 12.58 | 4.28 | 0.01 | 9.02 | 0.45 | 5.79 | |
12 | 1 437 | 2.56 | 31.00** | 0.28 | 15.74 | 5.46 | 0.01 | 11.17 | 0.36 | 10.71 |
Table 7
Composite model fitting of species abundance distribution"
样地 Sample plot | 陡变点 Abrupt point | dataset 1 多度总和 Abundance sum of dataset 1 | 群落多度 总和 Abundance sum of community | dataset 1 多度比例 Abundance proportion of dataset 1 | dataset 1 最佳拟合模型 Optimum model of dataset 1 | dataset 2 最佳拟合模型 Optimum model of dataset 2 | χ2 | D | AIC |
1 | 9 | 860 | 934 | 0.92 | ONM | RBS | 6.33 | 0.10 | -2.23 |
2 | 8 | 1 093 | 1 224 | 0.89 | ONM | RBS | 3.33 | 0.15 | -5.10 |
3 | 8 | 1 072 | 1 233 | 0.87 | ONM | RAM | 5.17 | 0.10 | 1.82 |
4 | 9 | 1 120 | 1 167 | 0.96 | ONM | RAM | 8.00 | 0.13 | 3.36 |
5 | 9 | 1 278 | 1 328 | 0.96 | ONM | RAM | 2.50 | 0.10 | -5.11 |
6 | 10 | 1 393 | 1 422 | 0.98 | ONM | RAM | 3.50 | 0.18 | -3.50 |
7 | 10 | 1 514 | 1 540 | 0.98 | ONM | RBS | 2.83 | 0.09 | -11.12 |
8 | 10 | 1 293 | 1 310 | 0.99 | ONM | RAM | 21.25* | 0.11 | 16.20 |
9 | 10 | 1 415 | 1 438 | 0.98 | ONM | DPM | 7.33 | 0.23 | 3.45 |
10 | 10 | 1 160 | 1 195 | 0.97 | ONM | DPM | 1.58 | 0.10 | -9.16 |
11 | 10 | 1 236 | 1 301 | 0.95 | ONM | RBS | 1.50 | 0.18 | -11.13 |
12 | 11 | 1 420 | 1 437 | 0.99 | ONM | DPM | 7.00 | 0.18 | 6.57 |
程佳佳, 米湘成, 马克平, 等. 亚热带常绿阔叶林群落物种多度分布格局对取样尺度的响应. 生物多样性, 2011, 19 (2): 168- 177. | |
Cheng J J , Mi X C , Ma K P , et al. Responses of species-abundance distribution to varying sampling scales in a subtropical broad-leaved forest. Biodiversity Science, 2011, 19 (2): 168- 177. | |
冯云, 马克明, 张育新, 等. 北京东灵山辽东栎(Quercus liaotungensis)林沿海拔梯度的物种多度分布. 生态学报, 2007, 27 (11): 4743- 4750.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.11.043 |
|
Feng Y , Ma K M , Zhang Y X , et al. Species abundance distribution of Quercus liaotungensis forest along altitudinal gradient in Dongling Mountain, Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27 (11): 4743- 4750.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.11.043 |
|
伏捷, 孙才志, 张华, 等. 辽东山地老秃顶子古冰缘地貌植物种群生态位特征. 地理研究, 2018, 37 (4): 731- 741. | |
Fu J , Sun C Z , Zhang H , et al. Niche characteristics of plant populations in the paleo-periglacial areas of Mt. Laotudingzi, eastern Liaoning mountainous region. Geographical Research, 2018, 37 (4): 731- 741. | |
高利霞, 毕润成, 闫明. 山西霍山油松林的物种多度分布格局. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35 (12): 1256- 1270. | |
Gao L X , Bi R C , Yan M . Species abundance distribution patterns of Pinus tabulaeformis forest in Huoshan Mountain of Shanxi Province, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35 (12): 1256- 1270. | |
韩大勇, 杨允菲. 松嫩草地植物群落物种多度-分布关系及其解释. 生物多样性, 2014, 22 (3): 348- 357. | |
Han D Y , Yang Y F . Species abundance-distribution relationship and its interpretation in plant communities on the Songnen grasslands, China. Biodiversity Science, 2014, 22 (3): 348- 357. | |
刘梦雪, 刘佳佳, 杜晓光, 等. 亚高寒草甸不同生境植物群落物种多度分布格局的拟合. 生态学报, 2010, 30 (24): 6935- 6942. | |
Liu M X , Liu J J , Du X G , et al. Fitting different models to species abundance distribution patterns in three plant communities in subalpine meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30 (24): 6935- 6942. | |
陆元昌, WernerSchindele, 刘宪钊, 等. 多功能目标下的近自然森林经营作业法研究. 西南林业大学学报, 2011, 31 (4): 1- 6, 11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2011.04.001 |
|
Lu Y C , Werner S , Liu X Z , et al. Study on operation system towards close-to-nature forest based on multi-function purposes. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2011, 31 (4): 1- 6, 11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2011.04.001 |
|
马克平, 刘灿然, 于顺利, 等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅲ. 几种类型森林群落的种-多度关系研究. 生态学报, 1997, 17 (6): 11- 21. | |
Ma K P , Liu C R , Yu S L , et al. Plant community diversity in Dongling Mountain in Beijing, China Ⅲ. Speicies-abundance relations of several types of forest communities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1997, 17 (6): 11- 21. | |
牛克昌, 刘怿宁, 沈泽昊, 等. 群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论. 生物多样性, 2009, 17 (6): 579- 593. | |
Niu K C , Liu Y N , Shen Z H , et al. Community assembly: the relative importance of neutral theory and niche theory. Biodiversity Science, 2009, 17 (6): 579- 593. | |
彭少麟, 殷祚云, 任海, 等. 多物种集合的种-多度关系模型研究进展. 生态学报, 2003, 23 (8): 1590- 1605.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.08.018 |
|
Peng S L , Yin Z Y , Ren H , et al. Advances in research on the species-abundance relationship models in multi-species collection. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23 (8): 1590- 1605.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.08.018 |
|
任萍, 王孝安, 郭华. 黄土高原森林群落物种多度的分布格局. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28 (8): 1449- 1455. | |
Ren P , Wang X A , Guo H . Species abundance distribution pattern of forest communities on Loess Plateau. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28 (8): 1449- 1455. | |
施建敏, 范承芳, 刘扬, 等. 石灰岩山地淡竹林演替序列的群落物种多度分布格局. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26 (12): 3595- 3601. | |
Shi J M , Fan C F , Liu Y , et al. Species-abundance distribution patterns along succession series of Phyllostachys glauca forest in a limestone mountain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26 (12): 3595- 3601. | |
石培礼, 李文华, 王金锡, 等. 四川卧龙亚高山林线生态交错带群落的种多度关系. 生态学报, 2000, 20 (3): 384- 389.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2000.03.006 |
|
Shi P L , Li W H , Wang J X , et al. Species-abundance relation of herb communities in subalpine timberline ecotone of Wolong Natural Reserve, Sichuan Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2000, 20 (3): 384- 389.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2000.03.006 |
|
王绪高, 郝占庆, 叶吉, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林物种多度和空间分布格局的关系. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27 (2): 145- 150.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-376X.2008.02.017 |
|
Wang X G , Hao Z Q , Ye J , et al. Relationships between species abundance and spatial distribution pattern of broad-leaved Korean pine(Pinus koraiensis)mixed forest in Changbai Mountains of China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27 (2): 145- 150.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-376X.2008.02.017 |
|
徐国瑞, 张育新, 张霜, 等. 海拔对表居土壤动物不同取食功能群多度分布的影响. 土壤学报, 2017, 54 (1): 237- 245. | |
Xu G R , Zhang Y X , Zhang S , et al. Effect of elevation on abundance distribution of different feeding groups in litter-dwelling soil fauna. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54 (1): 237- 245. | |
闫琰, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 长白山不同演替阶段针阔混交林群落物种多度分布格局. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36 (9): 923- 934. | |
Yan Y , Zhang C Y , Zhao X H . Species-abundance distribution patterns at different successional stages of conifer and broad-leaved mixed forest communities in Changbai Mountains, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36 (9): 923- 934. | |
姚兰, 崔国发, 易咏梅, 等. 湖北木林子保护区大样地的木本植物多样性. 林业科学, 2016, 52 (1): 1- 9. | |
Yao L , Cui G F , Yi Y M , et al. Species diversity of woody plants in Mulinzi Nature Reserve of Hubei Province. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52 (1): 1- 9. | |
张立敏, 陈斌, 李正跃. 应用中性理论分析局域群落中的物种多样性及稳定性. 生态学报, 2010, 30 (6): 1556- 1563. | |
Zhang L M , Chen B , Li Z Y . Analysis of the species diversity and community stability in local-community using the neutral theory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30 (6): 1556- 1563. | |
张姗, 蔺菲, 原作强, 等. 长白山阔叶红松林草本层物种多度分布格局及其季节动态. 生物多样性, 2015, 23 (5): 641- 648. | |
Zhang S , Lin F , Yuan Z Q , et al. Herb layer species abundance distribution patterns in different seasons in an old-growth temperate forest in Changbai Mountain, China. Biodiversity Science, 2015, 23 (5): 641- 648. | |
张忠华, 胡刚, 祝介东, 等. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶混交林物种多度与丰富度空间分布的尺度效应. 生态学报, 2012, 32 (18): 5663- 5672. | |
Zhang Z H , Gu G , Zhu J D , et al. Scale-dependent spatial variation of species abundance and richness in two mixed evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved karst forests, southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32 (18): 5663- 5672. | |
张会儒, 唐守正. 森林生态采伐更新技术体系研究. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2008. | |
Zhang H R , Tang S Z . Study on the technical system for ecology-based forest harvesting and regeneration. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2008. | |
赵天启, 古琛, 王亚婷, 等. 不同利用方式下典型草原植物群落物种多度分布格局. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (23): 7894- 7902. | |
Zhao T Q , Gu C , Wang Y T , et al. Species-abundance distribution of typical steppe grassland plant communities under different use patterns. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37 (23): 7894- 7902. | |
赵志模, 郭依泉. 群落生态学原理与方法. 重庆: 科学技术文献出版社重庆分社, 1990. | |
Zhao Z M , Guo Y Q . Principles and methods of community ecology. Chongqing: Chongqing Branch of Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, 1990. | |
周淑荣, 张大勇. 群落生态学的中性理论. 植物生态学报, 2006, 30 (5): 868- 877.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2006.05.018 |
|
Zhou S R , Zhang D Y . Neutral theory in community ecology. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2006, 30 (5): 868- 877.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-264X.2006.05.018 |
|
邹春静, 王庆礼, 韩士杰. 长白山暗针叶林建群种竞争关系的研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 2001, 7 (2): 101- 105.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-687X.2001.02.001 |
|
Zou C J , Wang Q L , Han S J . Study on competition relationship between ddificators in dark conifer forest in the Changbai Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2001, 7 (2): 101- 105.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-687X.2001.02.001 |
|
Alonso D , Etienne R S , McKane A J . The merits of neutral theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2006, 21 (8): 451- 457. | |
Alonso D , Mckane A J . Sampling Hubbell's neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 2010, 7 (10): 901- 910. | |
Bar-Massada A , Kent R , Carmel Y . Environmental heterogeneity affects the location of modelled communities along the niche-neutrality continuum. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2014, 281 (1783): 20133249.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3249 |
|
Bliss C I , Fisher R A . Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics, 1953, 9, 176- 200.
doi: 10.2307/3001850 |
|
Bulmer M G . On fitting the Poisson lognormal distribution to species-abundance data. Biometrics, 1974, 30 (1): 101- 110.
doi: 10.2307/2529621 |
|
Chase J M . Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities. Functional Ecology, 2005, 19 (1): 182- 186.
doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00937.x |
|
Cheng J , Mi X , Nadrowski K , et al. Separating the effect of mechanisms shaping species-abundance distributions at multiple scales in a subtropical forest. Oikos, 2012, 121 (2): 236- 244.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19428.x |
|
Chisholm R A , Pacala S W . Niche and neutral models predict asymptotically equivalent species abundance distributions in high-diversity ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107 (36): 15821- 15825.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009387107 |
|
Fisher C K , Mehta P . The transition between the niche and neutral regimes in ecology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111 (36): 13111- 13116.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405637111 |
|
Frontier S . Diversity and structure in aquatic ecosystems. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 1985, 23 (5): 253- 312. | |
Hill J K , Hamer K C . Using species abundance models as indicators of habitat disturbance in tropical forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 35 (3): 458- 460. | |
Hollingsworth T N , Johnstone J F , Bernhardt E L , et al. Fire severity filters regeneration traits to shape community assembly in Alaska's boreal forest. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 (2): e56033.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056033 |
|
Hu X S , He F , Hubbell S P . Neutral theory in macroecology and population genetics. Oikos, 2006, 113 (3): 548- 556.
doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14837.x |
|
Hubbell S P . The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press, 2001. | |
Hubbell S P . Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology, 2006, 87 (6): 1387- 1398.
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1387:NTATEO]2.0.CO;2 |
|
Kenneth P B, David R A. 2002. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag New York. | |
Kraft N J B , Valencia R , Ackerly D D . Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science, 2008, 322 (5901): 580- 582.
doi: 10.1126/science.1160662 |
|
Lai J , Coomes D A , Du X , et al. A general combined model to describe tree-diameter distributions within subtropical and temperate forest communities. Oikos, 2013, 122 (11): 1636- 1642.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00436.x |
|
Lauren S U , Charles B H , Paul D A . Twelve-year responses of planted and naturally regenerating conifers to variable-retention harvest in the Pacific northwest, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 43 (1): 46- 55.
doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2012-0323 |
|
Legovic T . Statistical ecology.A primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication, 1991, 337 | |
Magurran A E , Henderson P A . Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature, 2003, 422 (6933): 714- 716.
doi: 10.1038/nature01547 |
|
María V L , Guillermo M P , Emilce G . Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention to improve understory plant diversity conservation in southern Patagonian forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262 (7): 1236- 1250.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.021 |
|
Matthews T J , Borges P A V , Whittaker R J . Multimodal species abundance distributions: a deconstruction approach reveals the processes behind the pattern. Oikos, 2014, 123 (5): 533- 544.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00829.x |
|
Matthews T J , Whittaker R J . Neutral theory and the species abundance distribution: recent developments and prospects for unifying niche and neutral perspectives. Ecology & Evolution, 2014, 4 (11): 2263- 2277. | |
McGill B J , Etienne R S , Gray J S , et al. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10 (10): 995- 1015.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01094.x |
|
McGill B J , Maurer B A , Weiser M D . Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology, 2006, 87 (6): 1411- 1423.
doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1411:EEONT]2.0.CO;2 |
|
McGill B J . A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature, 2003, 422 (6934): 881- 885.
doi: 10.1038/nature01583 |
|
Morlon H , White E P , Etienne R S , et al. Taking species abundance distributions beyond individuals. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12 (6): 488- 501.
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01318.x |
|
Picard N , Bar-Hen A . Is the spatial correlation between the tree basal area and its increment a good indicator for competition?. Annals of Forest Science, 2002, 59 (1): 41- 51.
doi: 10.1051/forest:2001004 |
|
Podlaski R . Diversity of patch structure in Central European forests: are tree diameter distributions in near-natural multilayered Abies-Fagus stands heterogeneous?. Ecological Research, 2010, 25 (3): 599- 608.
doi: 10.1007/s11284-010-0690-6 |
|
Podlaski R . Forest modelling: the gamma shape mixture model and simulation of tree diameter distributions. Annals of Forest Science, 2017, 74 (2): 29- 38.
doi: 10.1007/s13595-017-0629-y |
|
Poot P , Lambers H . Are Trade-offs in allocation pattern and root morphology related to species abundance? A congeneric comparison between rare and common species in the south-western Australian flora. Journal of Ecology, 2003, 91 (1): 58- 67.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00738.x |
|
Roughgarden J . Is there a general theory of community ecology?. Biology & Philosophy, 2009, 24 (4): 521- 529.
doi: 10.1007/s10539-009-9164-z |
|
Stanley H W , Tilman D . Non-neutral patterns of species abundance in grassland communities. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9 (1): 15- 23. | |
Sugihara G , Bersier L F , Southwood T R E , et al. Predicted correspondence between species abundances and dendrograms of niche similarities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100 (9): 5246- 5251.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0831096100 |
|
Team R D C. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. | |
Tokeshi M . Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1990, 59 (3): 1129- 1146.
doi: 10.2307/5036 |
|
Vellend M . Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Quartyerly Review of Biology, 2010, 85 (2): 183- 206.
doi: 10.1086/652373 |
|
Volkov I , Banavar J R , Hubbell S P , et al. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature, 2003, 424 (6952): 1035- 1037.
doi: 10.1038/nature01883 |
|
Walker S C , Cyr H . Testing the standard neutral model of biodiversity in lake communities. Oikos, 2007, 116 (1): 143- 155.
doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.15300.x |
|
Wang H , Hui P , Gangying H , et al. Large trees are surrounded by more heterospecific neighboring trees in Korean pine broad-leaved natural forests. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8 (1): 9149- 9156.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27140-7 |
|
Wang X , Wiegand T , Wolf A , et al. Spatial patterns of tree species richness in two temperate forests. Journal of Ecology, 2011, 99 (6): 1382- 1393.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01857.x |
|
Yuan Z , Gazol A , Wang X , et al. Scale specific determinants of tree diversity in an old growth temperate forest in China. Basic & Applied Ecology, 2011, 12 (6): 488- 495. | |
Zhang J , Hao Z , Song B , et al. Fine-scale species co-occurrence patterns in an old-growth temperate forest. Forest Ecology & Management, 2009, 257 (10): 2115- 2120. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||