Scientia Silvae Sinicae ›› 2020, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (10): 105-112.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20201011
Previous Articles Next Articles
Guangshuang Duan1,2,Qiuyan Wang3,Xinyu Song1,Huiru Zhang2,Liyong Fu2,*
Received:
2018-09-17
Online:
2020-10-25
Published:
2020-11-26
Contact:
Liyong Fu
CLC Number:
Guangshuang Duan,Qiuyan Wang,Xinyu Song,Huiru Zhang,Liyong Fu. Relative Growth Relations between Height and Diameter of Individual Korean Pine under Competitive Environment[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2020, 56(10): 105-112.
Table 1
Summary statistics of individual stand for 4 species types"
类型 Types | 平均值 Mean | 最小值 Min. | 最大值 Max. | 标准差 SD | 株数 Number | |
红松 P.koraiensis | D/cm | 5.2 | 1.0 | 28.6 | 3.96 | 3 927 |
H/cm | 4.4 | 1.4 | 11.9 | 2.53 | ||
蒙古栎 Q.mongolica | D/cm | 19.5 | 1.4 | 70.1 | 9.84 | 2 890 |
H/cm | 13.4 | 1.8 | 36.6 | 4.29 | ||
阔叶树种 Broad-leaved tree | D/cm | 12.3 | 1.0 | 64.0 | 8.82 | 4 188 |
H/cm | 10.6 | 1.5 | 31.1 | 4.81 | ||
针叶树种 Coniferous tree | D/cm | 5.0 | 1.0 | 39.1 | 5.82 | 1 817 |
H/cm | 4.3 | 1.4 | 28.8 | 4.54 |
Table 2
The six types of interactions between tree height and DBH"
胸径 DBH | ||||
+(参数 Parameters>0) | 0(参数 Parameters=0) | -(参数 Parameters < 0) | ||
树高 Tree height | +(参数 Parameters>0) | +/+(互利共生 Mutualism) | +/0(偏利共生 Commensalism) | +/-(寄生关系 Parasitism) |
0(参数 Parameters=0) | 0/+(偏利共生 Commensalism) | 0/0(原始协作 Synergism) | 0/-(偏害共生 Amensalism) | |
-(参数 Parameters < 0) | -/+(寄生关系 Parasitism) | -/0(偏害共生 Amensalism) | -/-(竞争关系 Competition) |
Table 3
The parameter estimates and significance testing of model(1)"
参数 Parameters | 普通最小二乘法 Ordinary least squares | 似乎不相关回归法 Seemingly unrelated regressions | |||
H | D | H | D | ||
aH/λD | 1.089 3*** | -0.612 9*** | 0.797 7*** | -1.199 7*** | |
bH/βD | 0.562 9*** | 1.417 6*** | 0.626 2*** | 1.576 9*** | |
a1/λ1 | -0.087 9*** | 0.046 1 | -0.063 3*** | 0.095 0*** | |
a2/λ2 | -0.018 3 | 0.050 8 | -0.026 1 | 0.042 7 | |
a3/λ3 | -0.066 8*** | 0.112 5*** | -0.072 3*** | 0.115 2*** | |
a4/λ4 | -0.025 6 | -0.028 4 | -0.005 4 | 0.004 4 | |
b1/γ1 | -0.142 3*** | 0.244 7*** | -0.155 7*** | 0.248 3*** | |
b2/γ2 | -0.012 1*** | 0.018 6*** | -0.012 6*** | 0.019 9*** | |
b3/γ3 | -0.004 4 | 0.006 5 | -0.004 5 | 0.007 1 | |
b4/γ4 | -0.000 2 | 0.013 3 | -0.004 3 | 0.007 6 | |
c1/β1 | 0.299 8*** | -0.384 3*** | 0.287 0*** | -0.450 1*** | |
c2/β2 | 0.032 6*** | -0.054 1*** | 0.035 1*** | -0.055 8*** | |
c3/β3 | 0.018 2** | -0.028 8** | 0.019 1** | -0.030 3** | |
c4/β4 | 0.010 6 | -0.045 9* | 0.020 3 | -0.033 9 |
Table 6
The distribution of competitive tree of P.koraiensis"
树种 Tree species | 株树分布 Distribution | |||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | >6 | |
红松 P.koraiensis | 142 | 251 | 336 | 321 | 315 | 291 | 289 | 1 231 |
蒙古栎 Q.mongolica | 657 | 548 | 538 | 437 | 378 | 267 | 176 | 175 |
阔叶树种 Broad-leaved trees | 988 | 634 | 460 | 339 | 204 | 148 | 110 | 293 |
针叶树种 Coniferous trees | 1 825 | 439 | 254 | 160 | 116 | 92 | 62 | 228 |
全部 Total | 7 | 12 | 31 | 66 | 91 | 125 | 139 | 2 705 |
卢军, 张会儒, 雷相东, 等. 长白山云冷杉针阔混交林幼树树高-胸径模型. 北京林业大学学报, 2015. 37 (11): 10- 25. | |
Lu J , Zhang H R , Lei X D , et al. Height-diameter models for saplings in a spruce-fir mixed forest in Changbai Mountains. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2015. 37 (11): 10- 25. | |
张思玉, 郑世群. 笔架山常绿阔叶林优势种群种内种间竞争的数量研究. 林业科学, 2001. 37 (z1): 185- 188. | |
Zhang S Y , Zheng S Q . Quantitive study on intraspecific and interspecific competition for dominant population of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Bijia Mountain. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001. 37 (z1): 185- 188. | |
邹春静, 韩士杰, 张军辉. 阔叶红松林树种间竞争关系及其营林意义. 生态学杂志, 2001. 20 (4): 35- 38. | |
Zou C J , Han S J , Zhang J H . Competition relationship among tree species in broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest and its significance for managing the forest. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001. 20 (4): 35- 38. | |
Kimmins J P. 2005.森林生态学.曹福亮,译.北京:中国林业出版社, 411-424. | |
Kimmins J P. 2005. Forest ecology. Translated by Cao F L. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 411-424.[in Chinese] | |
Bartholomé J , Salmon F , Vigneron P , et al. Plasticity of primary and secondary growth dynamics in Eucalyptus hybrids:a quantitative genetics and QTL mapping perspective. BMC Plant Biology, 2013. 13 (1): 120.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-120 |
|
Barton M K . Twenty years on:the inner workings of the shoot apical meristem, a developmental dynamo. Developmental Biology, 2010. 341 (1): 95- 113.
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.11.029 |
|
Bullock S H . Developmental patterns of tree dimensions in a neotropical deciduous forest. Biotropica, 2010. 32 (1): 42- 52. | |
Falster D S , Westoby M . Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003. 18 (7): 337- 343. | |
Feldpausch T R , Banin L , Phillips O L , et al. Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences, 2011. 8 (5): 7727- 7793. | |
Fu L , Sun L , Han H , et al. How trees allocate carbon for optimal growth:insight from a game-theoretic model. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2017.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx003 |
|
Groover A . Evolution of development of vascular cambia and secondary growth. New Phytologist, 2010. 186 (3): 577- 592.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03236.x |
|
Henry H L , Aarssen L W . The interpretation of stem diameter-height allometry in trees:biomechanical constraints, neighbour effects, or biased regressions?. Ecology Letters, 2010. 2 (2): 89- 97. | |
Huang S , Titus S J , Wiens D P . Comparison of nonlinear height-diameter functions for major Alberta tree species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1992. 22 (9): 1297- 1304.
doi: 10.1139/x92-172 |
|
Hulshof C M , Swenson N G , Weiser M D . Tree height-diameter allometry across the United States. Ecology & Evolution, 2015. 5 (6): 1193- 1204. | |
Ilomäki S , Nikinmaa E , Mäkelä A . Crown rise due to competition drives biomass allocation in Silver birch. Revue Canadienne DE Recherche Forestière, 2003. 33 (12): 2395- 2404.
doi: 10.1139/x03-164 |
|
King D A , Davies S J , Nsm N . Growth and mortality are related to adult tree size in a Malaysian mixed dipterocarp forest. Forest Ecology & Management, 2006. 223 (1): 152- 158. | |
Mcmahon T . Size and shape in biology. Science, 1973. 179 (4079): 1201- 1204.
doi: 10.1126/science.179.4079.1201 |
|
Moles A T , Warton D I , Warman L , et al. Global patterns in plant height. Journal of Ecology, 2009. 97 (5): 923- 932.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01526.x |
|
Nash J F . The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 1950. 18 (2): 155- 162. | |
Niklas K J . The scaling of plant height:a comparison among major plant clades and anatomical grades. Annals of Botany, 1993. 72 (2): 165- 172.
doi: 10.1006/anbo.1993.1095 |
|
Niklas K J . Size-dependent allometry of tree height, diameter and trunk-taper. Annals of Botany, 1995. 75 (3): 217- 227.
doi: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1015 |
|
Niklas K J , Spatz H C . Growth and hydraulic(not mechanical)constraints govern the scaling of tree height and mass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. 101 (44): 15661- 15663.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405857101 |
|
Price C A , Enquist B J , Savage V M . A general model for allometric covariation in botanical form and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. 104 (32): 11320- 13204. | |
Scarano F R . Structure, function and floristic relationships of plant communities in stressful habitats marginal to the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Annals of Botany, 2002. 90 (4): 517- 524.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf189 |
|
Sumida A , Ito H , Isagi Y . Trade-off between height growth and stem diameter growth for an evergreen Oak, Quercus glauca, in a mixed hardwood forest. Functional Ecology, 1997. 11 (3): 300- 309.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1997.00085.x |
|
Trouvé R , Bontemps J D , Seynave I , et al. Stand density, tree social status and water stress influence allocation in height and diameter growth of Quercus petraea(Liebl.). Tree Physiology, 2015. 35 (10): 1035- 1046.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv067 |
|
Xu M , Jiang L , Zhu S , et al. A computational framework for mapping the timing of vegetative phase change. New Phytologist, 2016. 211 (2): 750- 760.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13907 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||