林业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 123-132.doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.LYKX20210965
车晓亮1,2,刘天颐1,王哲2,曾明2,李铨年2,赵奋成2,吴惠姗2,郭文冰2,*
收稿日期:
2021-12-29
出版日期:
2023-08-25
发布日期:
2023-10-16
通讯作者:
郭文冰
基金资助:
Xiaoliang Che1,2,Tianyi Liu1,Zhe Wang2,Ming Zeng2,Quannian Li2,Fencheng Zhao2,Huishan Wu2,Wenbing Guo2,*
Received:
2021-12-29
Online:
2023-08-25
Published:
2023-10-16
Contact:
Wenbing Guo
摘要:
目的: 研究湿加松人工林产脂量及其单萜成分与不同地点间、不同种类增脂剂间的关系,探索一种温和有效、成本低廉、适合广东地区湿加松人工林的增脂剂,以提高湿加松松脂质量和产量。方法: 在广东海丰(粤东)、始兴(粤北)和阳江(粤西)适龄采脂的湿加松人工林内进行硫酸钾(K2SO4)、苯甲酸化合物(BA)和乙烯利(CEPA)3种不同种类增脂剂试验,对3个地点处理与对照组的湿加松产脂量、胸径进行每木测量,分析每种增脂剂的增产率以及不同处理下产脂量与胸径的相关关系;收集松脂样品,采用气相色谱质谱联用技术对松脂单萜成分进行鉴定,并分析其相对含量。结果: 1) 与对照组相比,硫酸钾、苯甲酸混合物和乙烯利增脂剂的增产效果显著,乙烯利增产率最稳定、硫酸钾次之、苯甲酸混合物最差;不同地点间相比,海丰施用增脂剂的增产效果最好、阳江次之、始兴最差;2) 湿加松产脂量与1.7 m处树径呈正相关,对于海丰和阳江湿加松人工林,与对照组相比,无论施用何种增脂剂均能提高产脂量与1.7 m处树径的相关系数,对于始兴湿加松人工林,相关系数则下降;3) 与对照组相比,施用增脂剂不会改变湿加松松脂单萜主要成分及其相对含量,但增脂剂处理会产生少量α-松油醇;不同地点湿加松人工林中,个别松脂单萜成分相对含量存在显著差异,分别为α-蒎烯、β-蒎烯、α-水芹烯、β-水芹烯和β-月桂烯,海丰的样品中检测不出蒈烯。结论: 广东地区湿加松人工林施用乙烯利、硫酸钾或苯甲酸混合物增脂剂,可在保证松脂质量的前提下增加产量,虽然乙烯利松脂增产效果最稳定,但因其原料成本高于硫酸钾,且增产效果只在部分地点略高于硫酸钾,故综合考虑认为硫酸钾是广东地区湿加松人工林最适宜的增脂剂。合理施用增脂剂可以激发湿加松的产脂潜力,且不会对湿加松松脂的单萜成分及含量比例造成影响。
中图分类号:
车晓亮,刘天颐,王哲,曾明,李铨年,赵奋成,吴惠姗,郭文冰. 不同增脂剂对广东湿加松人工林产脂量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2023, 59(8): 123-132.
Xiaoliang Che,Tianyi Liu,Zhe Wang,Ming Zeng,Quannian Li,Fencheng Zhao,Huishan Wu,Wenbing Guo. Effect of Different Stimulating Pastes on Oleoresin Yield of the Hybrid Pine (Pinus elliottii × P. caribaea) Plantation in Guangdong Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2023, 59(8): 123-132.
表1
每个地点增脂剂对湿加松松脂产量影响的方差分析"
时间 Time | 自由度 Degress of freedom | 海丰 Haifeng | 始兴 Shixing | 阳江 Yangjiang | |||||
F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | ||||
10月上旬Early Oct. | 3 | 10.88 | <0.000 1 | 10.16 | <0.000 1 | 7.86 | <0.000 1 | ||
10月中旬Middle Oct. | 3 | 18.12 | <0.000 1 | 8.16 | <0.000 1 | 11.25 | <0.000 1 | ||
10月下旬Late Oct. | 3 | 27.35 | <0.000 1 | 12.33 | <0.000 1 | 6.26 | 0.000 4 | ||
11月上旬Early Nov. | 3 | 26.26 | <0.000 1 | 7.06 | 0.000 1 | 4.16 | 0.006 8 | ||
11月中旬Middle Nov. | 3 | 36.71 | <0.000 1 | 4.59 | 0.003 8 | 11.45 | <0.000 1 | ||
11月下旬Late Nov. | 3 | 27.46 | <0.000 1 | 12.99 | <0.000 1 | 6.57 | 0.000 3 |
表2
10月不同地点与增脂剂对湿加松松脂产量影响的方差分析"
变异来源 Source | 自由度 Degress of freedom | 10月上旬 Early Oct. | 10月中旬 Middle Oct. | 10月下旬 Late Oct. | |||||
F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | ||||
地点Sites | 2 | 11.87 | <0.000 1 | 29.91 | <0.000 1 | 5.21 | 0.005 7 | ||
处理Treatment | 3 | 29.52 | <0.000 1 | 32.77 | <0.000 1 | 41.27 | <0.000 1 | ||
地点×处理Sites×treatment | 6 | 2.49 | 0.021 8 | 7.66 | <0.000 1 | 2.73 | 0.012 5 |
表3
11月不同地点与增脂剂对湿加松松脂产量影响的方差分析"
变异来源 Source | 自由度 Degress of freedom | 11月上旬 Early Nov. | 11月中旬 Middle Nov. | 11月下旬 Late Nov. | |||||
F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | F | Pr>F | ||||
地点Sites | 2 | 11.33 | <0.000 1 | 36.75 | <0.000 1 | 28.53 | <0.000 1 | ||
处理Treatment | 3 | 47.65 | <0.000 1 | 44.62 | <0.000 1 | 40.73 | <0.000 1 | ||
地点×处理Sites×treatment | 6 | 2.01 | 0.061 9 | 6.34 | <0.000 1 | 2.12 | 0.048 7 |
表4
不同增脂剂在3个地点湿加松松脂产量的增产率"
地点 Sites | 处理 Treatment | 10月上旬 Early Oct. | 10月中旬 Middle Oct. | 10月下旬 Late Oct. | 11月上旬 Early Nov. | 11月中旬 Middle Nov. | 11月下旬 Late Nov. | 总量 Total yield |
海丰 Haifeng | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 73.00 | 129.22 | 160.00 | 175.45 | 212.04 | 170.58 | 147.63 |
苯甲酸BA | 63.52 | 106.49 | 64.98 | 127.74 | 135.85 | 81.14 | 94.41 | |
乙烯利CEPA | 76.58 | 104.41 | 113.83 | 173.25 | 232.46 | 131.21 | 134.05 | |
始兴 Shixing | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 8.03 | 11.85 | 63.62 | 70.53 | 55.74 | 121.25 | 52.02 |
苯甲酸BA | 56.03 | ?4.28 | 6.34 | 57.79 | 38.67 | 93.20 | 41.85 | |
乙烯利CEPA | 52.72 | 50.67 | 63.47 | 56.61 | 37.60 | 109.23 | 61.48 | |
阳江 Yangjiang | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 66.21 | 24.03 | 62.52 | 98.48 | 64.92 | 58.96 | 60.58 |
苯甲酸BA | 92.73 | ?1.30 | 52.82 | 111.15 | 78.41 | 54.16 | 62.06 | |
乙烯利CEPA | 95.24 | 77.70 | 86.50 | 127.98 | 82.29 | 67.82 | 89.07 |
表5
3个地点各试验组松脂产量与1.7 m处树径的相关系数①"
地点 Site | 组别 Group | 10月上旬 Early Oct. | 10月中旬 Middle Oct. | 10月下旬 Late Oct. | 11月上旬 Early Nov. | 11月中旬 Middle Nov. | 11月下旬 Late Nov. |
海丰 Haifeng | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 0.72*** | 0.82*** | 0.76*** | 0.75*** | 0.73*** | 0.76*** |
苯甲酸BA | 0.57*** | 0.59*** | 0.58*** | 0.61*** | 0.58*** | 0.51*** | |
乙烯利CEPA | 0.61*** | 0.74*** | 0.77*** | 0.72*** | 0.69*** | 0.69*** | |
对照组CK | 0.46** | 0.61*** | 0.44*** | 0.55*** | 0.45** | 0.54*** | |
始兴 Shixing | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 0.68*** | 0.69*** | 0.76*** | 0.75*** | 0.76*** | 0.78*** |
苯甲酸BA | 0.65*** | 0.58*** | 0.52*** | 0.56*** | 0.52*** | 0.60*** | |
乙烯利CEPA | 0.67*** | 0.84*** | 0.80*** | 0.77*** | 0.72*** | 0.73*** | |
对照组CK | 0.88*** | 0.85*** | 0.84*** | 0.80*** | 0.78*** | 0.78*** | |
阳江 Yangjiang | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 0.78*** | 0.71*** | 0.74*** | 0.73*** | 0.58*** | 0.65*** |
苯甲酸BA | 0.80*** | 0.68*** | 0.79*** | 0.83*** | 0.77*** | 0.75*** | |
乙烯利CEPA | 0.72*** | 0.75*** | 0.64*** | 0.68*** | 0.71*** | 0.63*** | |
对照组CK | 0.72*** | 0.66*** | 0.70*** | 0.69*** | 0.67*** | 0.70*** |
表6
湿加松松脂单萜成分相对含量的方差分析"
单萜成分 Monoterpenes | 变异来源 Source | 自由度 Degress of freedom | F | Pr>F |
蒈烯 3-Carene | 地点间 Between sites | 1 | 3.12 | 0.091 6 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.85 | 0.494 2 | |
α-蒎烯 α-Pinene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 6.80 | 0.002 8 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 1.17 | 0.333 2 | |
莰烯 Camphene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 2.94 | 0.064 3 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.62 | 0.604 3 | |
β-蒎烯 β-Pinene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 8.16 | 0.001 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 1.91 | 0.143 8 | |
桧烯 Sabinene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 0.23 | 0.801 9 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.64 | 0.626 0 | |
β-月桂烯 β-Myrcene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 49.71 | <0.000 1 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.34 | 0.798 6 | |
α-水芹烯 α-Phellandrene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 21.38 | <0.000 1 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.62 | 0.605 3 | |
β-水芹烯 β-Phellandrene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 12.54 | <0.000 1 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.45 | 0.715 3 | |
萜品油烯 Terpinolene | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 3.80 | 0.038 3 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 1.06 | 0.386 0 | |
芳樟醇 Linalool | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 1.37 | 0.274 9 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 1.40 | 0.269 5 | |
α-松油醇 α-Terpineol | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 1.32 | 0.292 3 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 2 | 1.21 | 0.322 6 | |
茴香脑 Estragole | 地点间 Between sites | 2 | 2.88 | 0.078 6 |
处理组间 Between treatment group | 3 | 0.27 | 0.846 3 |
表7
不同地点湿加松松脂单萜成分含量①"
单萜成分Monoterpenes | 海丰Haifeng | 始兴Shixing | 阳江Yangjiang |
蒈烯3-Carene | na | 0.035B | 0.045A |
α-蒎烯α-Pinene | 7.37A | 6.10B | 7.48A |
莰烯Camphene | 0.19A | 0.18A | 0.21A |
β-蒎烯β-Pinene | 3.30B | 5.10A | 5.07A |
桧烯Sabinene | 0.05A | 0.03A | 1.10A |
β-月桂烯β-Myrcene | 0.18C | 0.23B | 0.36A |
α-水芹烯α-Phellandrene | 0.06B | 0.05B | 0.13A |
β-水芹烯β-Phellandrene | 1.79B | 1.87B | 3.68A |
萜品油烯Terpinolene | 0.09A | 0.13A | 0.07A |
芳樟醇Linalool | 0.12A | 0.19A | 0.13A |
α-松油醇α-Terpineol | 0.09A | 0.13A | 0.07A |
茴香脑Estragole | 0.15A | 0.10A | 0.09A |
表8
不同增脂剂的湿加松松脂单萜成分相对含量①"
单萜成分Monoterpenes | 对照组Control | 硫酸钾K2SO4 | 苯甲酸BA | 乙烯利CEPA |
蒈烯3-carene | 0.054 | 0.043 | 0.040 | 0.040 |
α-蒎烯α-Pinene | 6.81 | 6.58 | 7.43 | 7.22 |
莰烯Camphene | 0.19 | 0.2 | 0.21 | 0.2 |
β-蒎烯β-Pinene | 4.22 | 4.61 | 5.23 | 3.91 |
桧烯Sabinene | 0.01 | 0.008 | 2.16 | 1.98 |
β-月桂烯β-Myrcene | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.25 |
α-水芹烯α-Phellandrene | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
β-水芹烯β-Phellandrene | 2.14 | 2.77 | 2.38 | 2.42 |
萜品油烯Terpinolene | 0.033 | 0.041 | 0.043 | 0.038 |
芳樟醇Linalool | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.14 |
α-松油醇α-Terpineol | na | 0.14 | 0.094 | 0.096 |
茴香脑Estragole | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
何克军. 澳大利亚昆士兰州松树杂交育种和造林. 广东林业科技, 1996, 12 (3): 34- 38. | |
He K J. Hybrid breeding and planting of exotic pine in Queensland. Forestry Science and Technology of Guangdong Province, 1996, 12 (3): 34- 38. | |
黄永权, 赵奋成. 广东湿加松良种选育现状及发展对策. 福建林业科技, 2007, 34 (1): 158- 162,193.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2007.01.039 |
|
Huang Y Q, Zhao F C. Current situation and developing proposal on the breedling of Pinus elliottii × P. caribaeahybridin Guangdong . Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2007, 34 (1): 158- 162,193.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2007.01.039 |
|
冷春晖. 2019. 湿地松产脂量与生长、树脂道及松节油的相关性研究. 南昌: 江西农业大学. | |
Leng C H. 2019. Study on the correlation between resin yield and growth, resin channel and turpentine of Pinus elliottii. Nanchang: Jiangxi Agricultural University.[in Chinese] | |
冷春晖, 张 露, 易 敏, 等. 湿地松产脂量与生长及树冠性状多点遗传相关及通径分析. 核农学报, 2020, 34 (7): 1598- 1605.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.07.1598 |
|
Leng C H, Zhang L, Yi M, et al. Multipoint genetic correlation and path analysis of resin yield and growth traits and crown traits in slash pine. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34 (7): 1598- 1605.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.07.1598 |
|
李计顺, 潘佳亮, 刘 超, 等. 2020年全国松材线虫病疫情流行情况分析. 中国森林病虫, 2021, 40 (4): 1- 4. | |
Li J S, Pan J L, Liu C, et al. Analysis of the epidemic situation of pine wilt disease in China in 2020. Forest Pest and Disease, 2021, 40 (4): 1- 4. | |
李思广, 周 云. 脂材兼用型思茅松无性系选择研究. 西部林业科学, 2021, 50 (4): 13- 17.
doi: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2021.04.003 |
|
Li S G, Zhou Y. Clone selection of Pinus kesiya var . langbianensis for resin and timber. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2021, 50 (4): 13- 17.
doi: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2021.04.003 |
|
李 艳, 吴际友, 程 勇, 等. 湿地松半同胞家系松脂产量选择研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37 (1): 48- 52.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.01.009 |
|
Li Y, Wu J Y, Cheng Y, et al. Study on selection of resin output among half-sib families of Pinus elliottii . Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37 (1): 48- 52.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.01.009 |
|
卢 斌, 张 帅, 李巨仲, 等. 湿加松增脂剂初步研究. 林业科技通讯, 2019, (12): 45- 47. | |
Lu B, Zhang S, Li J Z, et al. Preliminary study on Pinus elliottii × P.caribaeafatliquoring agent . Forest Science and Technology, 2019, (12): 45- 47. | |
沈熙环, 黄永权. 广东省湿加松良种选育和推广进展. 林业科技通讯, 2018, (1): 74- 75.
doi: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2018.01.024 |
|
Shen X H, Huang Y Q. Progress in breeding and promotion of improved variety of Pinus elliottii × P.caribaeain Guangdong Province . Forest Science and Technology, 2018, (1): 74- 75.
doi: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2018.01.024 |
|
宋湛谦. 松香的精细化工利用(Ⅰ): 松香的组成与性质. 林产化工通讯, 2002, (4): 29- 33. | |
Song Z Q. Fine chemical utilization of rosin (I): composition and properties of rosin. Journal of Chemical Industry of Forest Products (Bimonthly), 2002, (4): 29- 33. | |
吴东山. 2014. 广西马尾松松脂产量及其松脂组分的遗传变异研究. 南宁: 广西大学. | |
Wu D S. 2014. Study on the genetic variation of rosin yield and rosin components of Pinus massoniana in Guangxi. Nanning: Guangxi University.[in Chinese] | |
吴东山, 杨章旗, 黄永利. 不同杂种松产脂力及松脂成分的变异研究. 生物质化学工程, 2018, 52 (5): 6- 12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2018.05.002 |
|
Wu D S, Yang Z Q, Huang Y L. Comparative analysis of resin-producing capacity and resin composition of different hybrid pine. Biomass Chemical Engineering, 2018, 52 (5): 6- 12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2018.05.002 |
|
叶建仁. 松材线虫病在中国的流行现状、防治技术与对策分析. 林业科学, 2019, 55 (9): 1- 10. | |
Ye J R. Epidemic status of pine wilt disease in China and its prevention and control techniques and counter measures. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2019, 55 (9): 1- 10. | |
尹焕焕, 刘青华, 周志春, 等. 马尾松产脂性状与生长性状的无性系变异及相关性. 林业科学, 2018, 54 (12): 82- 91.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181209 |
|
Yin H H, Liu Q H, Zhou Z C, et al. Genetic variation among clones of masson pine (Pinus massoniana) for growth, oleoresin traits and their correlations . Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54 (12): 82- 91.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20181209 |
|
赵奋成, 张应中, 李福明, 等. 湿地松×加勒比松F1杂种的扦插苗与实生苗早期生长比较. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18 (3): 325- 330. | |
Zhao F C, Zhang Y Z, Li F M, et al. A comparison on the early growth of cutting stock and seedlings of slash pine × caribbean pine F1 hybrids. Forest Research, 2005, 18 (3): 325- 330. | |
赵振东, 刘先章. 松节油的精细化学利用(Ⅰ): 松节油及精细化学利用基础. 林产化工通讯, 2001, (1): 42- 47. | |
Zhao Z D, Liu X Z. Fine chemical utilization of turpentine (I): turpentine and basis of fine chemical utilization. Journal of Chemical Industry of Forest Products (Bimonthly), 2001, (1): 42- 47. | |
周晨晨, 李义良, 王 哲, 等. 基于RNA-Seq技术的湿加松特定时期产脂差异基因筛选及表达分析. 植物研究, 2021, 41 (3): 419- 428.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.03.012 |
|
Zhou C C, Li Y L, Wang Z, et al. Screening and expression analysis of different genes for oleoresin production in the specific period of Pinus elliottii × P.caribaeaby RNA-seq technology . Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41 (3): 419- 428.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.03.012 |
|
Coppen J J W, Hone G A. 1995. Gum naval stores turpentine and rosin from pine resin//Non-Wood Forest Products 2. Roma: Fao, 1-59. | |
Durrant W E, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2004, 42, 185- 209.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421 |
|
Knebel L, Robison D J, Wentworth T R, et al. Resin flow responses to fertilization, wounding and fungal inoculation in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) in north Carolina . Tree Physiology, 2008, 28 (6): 847- 853.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.6.847 |
|
Kossuth S V, Roberts D R, Huffman J B, et al. Resin acid, turpentine, and caloric content of paraquat-treated slash pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1982, 12 (3): 489- 492.
doi: 10.1139/x82-076 |
|
Luchi N, Ma R, Capretti P, et al. Systemic induction of traumatic resin ducts and resin flow in Austrian pine by wounding and inoculation with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata . Planta, 2005, 221 (1): 75- 84.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1414-3 |
|
Martin D, Tholl D, Gershenzon J, et al. Methyl jasmonate induces traumatic resin ducts, terpenoid resin biosynthesis, and terpenoid accumulation in developing xylem of Norway spruce stems. Plant Physiology, 2002, 129 (3): 1003- 1018.
doi: 10.1104/pp.011001 |
|
Miller B, Madilao L L, Ralph S, et al. 2005. Insect-induced conifer defense. white pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in sitka spruce. Plant Physiology, 137(1): 369-382. | |
Moreira X, Zas R, Solla A, et al. Differentiation of persistent anatomical defensive structures is costly and determined by nutrient availability and genetic growth-defence constraints. Tree Physiology, 2015, 35 (2): 112- 123.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu106 |
|
Neis F A, de Costa F, de Almeida M R, et al. Resin exudation profile, chemical composition, and secretory canal characterization in contrasting yield phenotypes of Pinus elliottii Engelm . Industrial Crops and Products, 2019, 132, 76- 83.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.02.013 |
|
Neis F A, de Costa F, Füller T N, et al. Biomass yield of resin in adult Pinus elliottii Engelm . trees is differentially regulated by environmental factors and biochemical effectors. Industrial Crops and Products, 2018, 118, 20- 25. | |
Popp M P, Johnson J D, Lesney M S. Changes in ethylene production and monoterpene concentration in slash pine and loblolly pine following inoculation with bark beetle vectored fungi. Tree Physiology, 1995, 15 (12): 807- 812.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/15.12.807 |
|
Radwan D E M, Fayez K A, Younis Mahmoud S, et al. Physiological and metabolic changes of Cucurbita pepo leaves in response to zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) infection and salicylic acid treatments . Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2007, 45 (6/7): 480- 489. | |
Rodrigues-Corrêa K C S, Apel M A, Henriques A T, et al. Efficient oleoresin biomass production in pines using low cost metal containing stimulant paste. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2011, 35 (10): 4442- 4448.
doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.08.021 |
|
Rodrigues-Corrêa K C S, Azevedo P C N, Sobreiro L E, et al. Oleoresin yield of Pinus elliottii plantations in a subtropical climate: effect of tree diameter, wound shape and concentration of active adjuvants in resin stimulating paste . Industrial Crops and Products, 2008, 27 (3): 322- 327.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.11.010 |
|
Rodrigues-Corrêa K C S, Fett-Neto A G. Oleoresin yield of Pinus elliottii in a subtropical climate: seasonal variation and effect of auxin and salicylic acid-based stimulant paste . Industrial Crops and Products, 2009, 30 (2): 316- 320.
doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.06.004 |
|
Rodrigues-Corrêa K C S, Fett-Neto A G. Seasonality and chemical elicitation of defense oleoresin production in field-grown slash pine under subtropical climate. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 2013, 25 (1): 56- 61.
doi: 10.1590/S2197-00252013000100007 |
|
Rodrigues-Corrêa K C S, Lima J C, Fett-Neto A G. Pine oleoresin: tapping green chemicals, biofuels, food protection, and carbon sequestration from multipurpose trees. Food and Energy Security, 2012, 1 (2): 81- 93.
doi: 10.1002/fes3.13 |
|
Rodrı́guez F I, Esch J J, Hall A E, et al. A copper cofactor for the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidopsis . Science, 1999, 283 (5404): 996- 998.
doi: 10.1126/science.283.5404.996 |
|
Susaeta A, Peter G F, Hodges A W, et al. Oleoresin tapping of planted slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm . var. elliottii) adds value and management flexibility to landowners in the southern United States. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014, 68, 55- 61. | |
Urbanek Krajnc A, Kristl J, Ivancic A. Application of salicylic acid induces antioxidant defense responses in the phloem of Picea abies and inhibits colonization by Ips typographus . Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 261 (3): 416- 426.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.027 |
|
Vallad G E, Goodman R M. Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science, 2004, 44 (6): 1920- 1934.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.1920 |
|
Vazquez-Gonzalez C, Lopez-Goldar X, Alia R, et al. Genetic variation in resin yield and covariation with tree growth in maritime pine. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, 482, 118843.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118843 |
[1] | 王哲,刘阳,赵奋成,曾明,李福明,吴惠姗,李义良,廖仿炎,邓乐平,钟岁英,郭文冰. 不同促脂剂对湿地松家系的增脂效果及对生长的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(9): 106-116. |
[2] | 袁金梅,罗靖,朱琳琳,席婉,曾旭梅,熊康舜,王彩云,郑日如. 3个桂花品种花瓣游离态和糖苷态香气成分[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(8): 33-42. |
[3] | 魏永成, 刘青华, 周志春, 丰忠平. 不同产脂量马尾松无性系木质部树脂道结构差异[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(7): 38-45. |
[4] | 杨章旗. 马尾松不同年龄产脂量及松香组分分析[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(6): 147-151. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||